True Bifurcation Lesions Research Articles

Percutaneous coronary intervention for true bifurcation lesions: a single-center experience including the setting of acute coronary syndromes

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for true coronary bifurcation lesions is challenging. Purpose To describe procedural and clinical outcomes of true bifurcation PCI. Methods Single-center retrospective study of consecutive patients (pts) submitted to PCI for true bifurcation lesions (06/2018-06/2020). MACE comprised death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, restenosis and reintervention. Results During the study period, 1678 PCI were performed, of which 7% were for true bifurcation lesions (Medina x,x,1). 118 pts (mean age 66.4 ± 11.0 years; 74.6% male; 32.2% diabetic; mean left ventricular ejection fraction 49.8 ± 8.4%) were included. Most pts (64.7%) were treated in the setting of an acute coronary syndrome (ACS): 26.7% ST-elevation MI, 31.9% non-ST-elevation MI, 6.0% unstable angina. 35.3% were treated for a chronic coronary syndrome. 24.8% of pts presented with 3-vessel disease and 11.1% had a left main (LM) lesion. The most frequently diseased main branch was the left anterior descending artery: 21.2% (68), followed by the left circumflex: 17.8% (21), right coronary artery: 12.7% (15) and LM: 11.9% (14). In terms of bifurcation classification, lesions were mainly Medina 1,1,1 (71.2%), followed by 0,1,1 (13.6%); 1,0,1 (9.2%) and 0,0,1 (5.9%). PCI was mainly performed via radial artery (73.7%). Mean number of stents: 1.4 ± 0.6. Lesions were predominantly treated with single stenting technique (80.3%). Double-stenting was used in 23 (19.7%) pts: TAP was the most used technique (10), followed by culotte (3), crush (2), double kissing crush (2) and T-stent (1). Proximal optimization technique and kissing balloon inflation were performed in 38.1% and 44.9% of cases, respectively. Rotational atherectomy was used in 10.4%. Ventricular support devices were used in 3 pts (1 Impella, 2 intra-aortic balloon pump). Intracoronary imaging was used in 13 pts: intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) in 8 and 5 pts, respectively; its use was more frequent in cases of LM PCI (p=.002). OCT was associated with higher contrast doses (350 vs 224 ml, p<.001), with no increase in acute kidney injury incidence (p=.413). Fluoroscopic time (p=.684) and radiation dose (p=.916) did not differ. Side branch occlusion occurred in 5 pts and iatrogenic coronary dissection in 7 pts. At a mean follow-up time of 17.3 ± 8.1 months, MACE and mortality rates were 13.3% and 6.9%. MACE occurred more frequently in pts with LM lesion (p<.001) and less often in cases where complete revascularization was achieved (p=.006). Conclusions True bifurcations represented a relatively small percentage of PCI lesions and were mainly performed in ACS setting. In line with literature, single stenting was the most used technique. MACE rate was globally low and was decreased by complete revascularization. Still, LM bifurcation PCI was associated with increased MACE.

Crush techniques for percutaneous coronary intervention of bifurcation lesions.

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of coronary artery bifurcation lesions entails technical challenges and carries a higher risk of adverse events on follow-up, driven by repeat revascularisation and stent thrombosis. While most bifurcations can be tackled with a provisional (single-stent) approach, more complex lesions involving both branches (true bifurcation lesions) require a two-stent approach. In the latter context, several techniques have been proposed. Among them, the crush technique has dramatically evolved in recent years, and its more recent iterations have been shown to provide excellent and durable results, both for left main and non-left main bifurcations. The aim of the present work is to discuss the technical aspects and outcomes of the variants of the crush technique from the first description in the early 2000s to the present day.

Successful endovascular treatment of left main bifurcation lesion using the DK-CRUSH technique with intracoronary imaging using optical coherence tomography: A case report

We report the successful endovascular treatment of true left main bifurcation lesion in a patient with chronic coronary syndrome using the DK-CRUSH technique. We describe technical aspects of bifurcation stenting with intracoronary imaging using optical coherence tomography. Here, we review the current state of the problem of choosing the optimal technique for endovascular treatment of patients with true left main true bifurcation lesion.

Optical Coherence Tomography to Assess Proximal Side Optimization Technique in Crush Stenting.

AimThe aim of this study was to explore the potential intraprocedural benefits of the Proximal Side Optimization (PSO) technique by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT).MethodsA case series of 10 consecutive true bifurcation lesions, with severe long pathology of long side branch (SB), were randomly assigned to be treated by standard DK Crush procedure (non-PSO group) as compared to DK Crush in PSO modification (PSO group). The data from OCT investigation before crushing of the SB Drug-Eluting Stent (DES), after crushing, after first kissing balloon inflation (KBI), and after final angiography were compared between the two groups (Public trials registry ISRCTN23355755).ResultsAll 10 cases were successfully treated by the assigned technique. The two groups were similar in terms of indications for the procedure, bifurcation angle, and stent dimensions. As compared to the non-PSO, the PSO group showed larger proximal SB stent areas (5.8 ± 1.8 vs. 4.5 ± 0.5 mm2; p = 0.02), the larger delta between distal and proximal stent areas before crush (1.5 ± 0.7 vs. 0.6 ± 0.5 mm2; p = 0.004), and the larger Space of Optimal Wiring (SOW) after Crush (5.3 ± 1.8 vs. 2.5 ± 1.1 mm2; p = 0.02). The gaps in scaffolding within the ostial segment of the Side Branch DES were found in two patients from the non-PSO group.ConclusionThe DK Crush in PSO modification results in larger SB DES and SOW areas with better apposition to the vessel wall. As result, the SB DES acquires a funnel shape, which reduces the risk of passage outside the SB stent struts during re-wiring, thus, allowing predictable and secure results.

Rationale and design for comparison of non-compliant balloon with drug-coating balloon angioplasty for side branch after provisional stenting for patients with true coronary bifurcation lesions: a prospective, multicentre and randomised DCB-BIF trial

IntroductionProvisional stenting using drug-eluting stent is effective for simple coronary bifurcation lesions. Kissing balloon inflation using conventional non-compliant balloon is the primary treatment of side branch (SB) after main vessel...

Protective ballooning technique for prevention of side branch occlusion in coronary nonleft main true bifurcation lesions: A single-center study.

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a protective ballooning technique in preventing side branch (SB) occlusion and to assess the long-term clinical outcomes for coronary nonleft main true bifurcation lesions. SB occlusion is a major complication associated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for coronary bifurcation lesions. Patients were consecutively enrolled and randomly assigned to protective ballooning technique or jailed wire technique group. Periprocedural and long-term clinical outcomes were compared. Patients in the protective ballooning technique (n = 173) and jailed wire technique (n = 167) groups were followed up for 12 months. SB occlusion occurred in one patient (0.6%) and nine patients (5.4%) in each group, respectively. The proportion of thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade 3 of the SB was higher in the protective ballooning technique group (98.8% vs. 95.2%, p < 0.05). SB rewiring was necessary in one patient in the protective ballooning technique group (0.6%) with provisional stenting, significantly lower than that in the jailed wire technique group (seven patients, 4.2%; p = 0.03). Periprocedural myocardial infarction occurred in three (1.73%) and six (3.59%) patients in the protective ballooning technique and jailed wire technique groups without significant difference, respectively. Major adverse cardiovascular events at 12 months were similar in both groups. Protective ballooning technique is effective for the prevention of SB occlusion in nonleft main true bifurcation lesions and had favorable long-term outcomes at the 12-month follow-up.

Impact of directional coronary atherectomy followed by drug-coated balloon strategy to avoid the complex stenting for bifurcation lesions.

Although the simple single stenting rather than complex double stenting is recommended on percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for bifurcation lesions, double stenting cannot always be avoided. We investigated the impact of directional coronary atherectomy (DCA), followed by drug-coated balloon (DCB) treatment to reduce the number of stents and avoid complex stenting in PCI for bifurcation lesions and short-term patency. DCA treatment without stents was attempted for 27 bifurcation lesions in 25 patients, of those, 26 bifurcation lesions in 24 patients were successfully treated and 3-month follow-up angiography and optical coherence tomography (OCT) were performed. Sixteen lesions (59.3%) were related to left main trunk distal bifurcations, and 7 (25.9%) were true bifurcation lesions. Among the true bifurcation lesions, 4 lesions (57.1%) needed 1 stent, and the other 3 lesions (42.9%) needed no stents. Among the non-true bifurcation lesions, 1 lesion (5.0%) needed bailout stent and other lesions (95.0%) needed no stents. According to DCA followed by DCB treatment, the angiographic mean diameter stenosis improved from 65.5 ± 15.0% to 7.8 ± 9.8%, and the mean plaque area in intravascular ultrasound improved from 80.4 ± 10.5% to 39.0 ± 11.5%, respectively. Angiographic and OCT late lumen loss values were 0.2 ± 0.6mm and 1.4 ± 1.9mm, respectively. No patient had in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and 3-month MACE. In conclusion, compared with standard provisional side branch stenting strategy, DCA followed by DCB treatment might reduce the number of stents, avoid complex stenting for major bifurcation lesions and provide good short-term outcomes.

Treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions with dedicated stent BiOSS ® LIM C: A single-center observational study

The challenges of coronary bifurcation angioplasty are linked to the fractal geometry of their anatomy, responsible for the differences in diameter between the different segments with risk of stent malposition in the main branch and difficulty to access the side branch. Dedicated stents for bifurcation have been developed to reduce these potential risks. The BiOSS ® LIM C stent (Balton, Warsaw, Poland) is a Cobalt Chrome drug eluting stent with Sirolimus dedicated to the treatment of bifurcation lesions. Our single-center retrospective study included 173 consecutive patients treated for a bifurcation lesion with a BiOSS ® LIM C stent between December 2017 and February 2020. The mean age was 71 ± 11.6 years. The percentage of true bifurcation lesions was 27.2%. The angioplasty success rates for the main branch and the side branch were respectively 100% and 99.4%. The mean duration of follow-up was 311 days. We observed during the follow-up: 4 cardiovascular deaths (2.3%), 5 myocardial infarctions (2.9%), 2 stent thrombosis (1.2%), 10 TLR (6%), 16 TVR (9.2%), 18 TVF (10.4%). The probabilities of overall survival, survival without cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction and survival without TVF are respectively 95%, 90% and 81%. Angioplasty of coronary bifurcation lesions with a dedicated stent BiOSS ® LIM C is safe and provides very good immediate and long-term results.

Single stenting versus double stenting technique in true bifurcation coronary lesions

Abstract Introduction The ideal treatment technique for coronary bifurcation lesions remains unknown. Although single-stenting strategy has been recommended by default, little evidence exists regarding clinical outcomes between single versus double-stenting in current practice. Purpose To compare procedural details and clinical outcomes between single vs double-stenting techniques in true bifurcation coronary lesions. Methods Retrospective study of all patients (pts) referred for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of true bifurcation lesions between June 2018 and June 2020. Only Medina X,X,1 lesions were included. Pts were split in 2 groups: group 1 (single-stenting) and group 2 (double-stenting). Procedural details and clinical outcomes were assessed. Acute and long-term adverse events included procedural complications (a composite outcome of side branch occlusion, coronary iatrogenic dissection and type 4 acute myocardial infarction (AMI)) and a composite of cardiovascular death, AMI, stroke, re-restenosis and reintervention, respectively. Results A total of 118 pts were included, 74,6% male, mean age of 66,4±11 years. Ninety-five pts (80,5%) were treated with single-stenting (G1) and 23 pts (19,5%) with double-stenting technique (G2). Both groups were well matched regarding baseline characteristics and clinical presentation. T and protrusion (TAP) and minicrush were the most frequent double-stenting techniques (43,5% and 21,7%). G2 lesions mainly involved the left main (LM) and proximal left anterior descendent artery (LAD) (52,2%) and in G1 mid LAD (34,7%). LM lesions were more common in G2 (26,1% vs 8,4%; p=0,030). G1 had more lesions Medina 1,1,1 (75,8% vs 52,2%; p=0,025) and less Medina 0,1,1 (9,5% vs 30,4%; p=0,015). Proximal optimization technique and kissing balloon occurred more in G2 (p&amp;lt;0,05). G2 had more intravascular ultrasound guided PCI (p=0,046). Femoral access, heparin, contrast and radiation dose, and fluoroscopy time were higher in G2 (p&amp;lt;0,05). Acute adverse composite outcome was similar in both groups (G1 13% vs G2 14,3%; p=0,855). Median follow-up was similar (G1 16,8±7,9 and G2 19,7±8,8 months; p=0,127). G1 had less occurrence of long-term adverse composite outcome (7,4% vs 26,3%; p=0,032). Excluding interventions in LM, G2 had more significant incidence of acute events (20% vs 2,6%; p=0,028), and higher rate of long-term adverse events (20% vs 4,2%; p=0,056). In interventions of the LM only, no differences were noticed in acute and long-term composite events between groups. Conclusions Double-stenting techniques in true coronary bifurcation lesions included more often LM lesions and were complex procedures requiring frequently intracoronary imaging. Although acute adverse events were similar to those of single-stenting, long-term adverse outcomes were more frequent in double-stent group, except for LM lesions. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

Double kissing – crush technique to treat coronary bifurcation lesions: analysis of success rate, procedural times and device usage

Abstract Background The Double Kissing Crush (“DK Crush”) technique is one of the recommended planned 2-stent techniques to treat true coronary bifurcation lesions (Medina 1–1-1, Medina 0–1-1). While some trials demonstrated superiority to other techniques, DK Crush requires a sequence of specific and potentially technically challenging steps. No data exists on the procedural difficulty of the various steps required for DK Crush. We therefore analyzed procedural times and device usage in a systematic fashion. Methods and results 54 patients (42 male, mean age 67±12 years) intended for treatment with DK Crush were enrolled. Detailed procedural characteristics including exact times and device usage for each step of DK Crush were prospectively measured and analyzed. DK Crush was successful in 48/54 patients (89%). In two patients stenting technique was changed to T- or TAP-stenting due to anatomical reasons at the moment of positioning of the SB stent. In one patient no balloon could cross the lesion and in another the procedure had to be modified due to coronary perforation directly after pre-dilatation. True failure of DK Crush was observed in two cases: In one case, the first rewiring of the SB, in the other, placement of a balloon for first kissing balloon (KB) maneuver in the SB was not possible. These 6 patients were excluded from further analysis. Median times for each step were: 1:21min (IQR 0:52min-1:50min) for wiring SB, 1:18min (IQR 0:47min-1:42min) for wiring MV, 1:30min (IQR 0:54min-2:15min) for stent placement in the SB, 0:40min (IQR 0:29min-1:21min) for balloon placement in the MV. First rewiring of the SB after SB stent crush required 1:30min (IQR 0:37min-2:05min), 1st KB placement in the SB took 1:42min (IQR 1:00min-3:13min) and 1st KB placement in the MV required 0:45min (IQR 0:27min-1:19min). Stent placement in the MV required 1:34min (IQR 1:09min-2:40min) and 2nd rewiring of the SB 1:21min (IQR 0:55min-2:04min), 2nd KB placement of the SB 2:08min (IQR 1:01min-3:36min) and 2nd KB placement of the MV 0:50min (IQR 0:34min-1:01min). Final POT was performed in all cases. Median total procedure time was 52:35 min (IQR 00:42:54h-1:01:37h). Additional devices were needed in 10% (3x1, 2x2 balloons) for stent placement in the SB; in 46% (20x1, 1x4 wires) for the first rewiring of the SB and in 49% (20x1, 3x2 balloons) for 1st KB placement in the SB. The 2nd rewiring of the SB required additional wires in 32% (13x1, 2x2 wires) and 54% of the patients required additional balloons for the 2nd KB placement in the SB (20x1, 2x2, 1x3, 2x5 balloons). Final TIMI flow was III in 97.9%. Complications occurred in 6% (n=3), each showing coronary dissection with TIMI III flow in 2 patients and TIMI I flow in 1 patient after placement of additional stents. Conclusion DKMC has a high success rate but is a time-consuming and material-intensive technique. The placement of the 2nd KB in the SB requires most of the procedural time and resources. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

Management of bifurcation culprit lesion in the setting of anterior ST elevation myocardial infarction

Abstract Introduction Coronary bifurcation lesions are considered one of the challenging entities in the field of coronary intervention due to the risk of side branch loss and higher risk of stent thrombosis. However, there is limited data about the proper management of such lesions in the setting of myocardial infarction as most bifurcation lesion studies excluded patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Aim To compare in-hospital and mid-term outcomes of single-stent and two-stents strategy in the management of bifurcation culprit lesions in patients presenting with anterior STEMI Methods This retrospective multi-center study included all consecutive patients presented with anterior STEMI who underwent primary PCI between January 2017 and December 2019, coronary angiography showed true bifurcation lesion with sizable side branch that can be managed by stenting. Patients with left main bifurcation lesion, patients indicated for urgent CABG, or patients in cardiogenic shock were excluded. Included patients were divided into two main groups according to the stenting strategy either single or two stents strategy. Six months of follow up data were collected by telephone calls and the examination of medical records Results Out of 1355 anterior STEMI patients presented between January 2017 and December 2019, 158 patients (11.6%) were identified to have bifurcation culprit lesions with a sizable diagonal branch. The baseline characteristics and angiographic findings were similar in both groups except for higher side branch involvement in the two stents group (83.31%± 11.20 and 71.88%±15.05, t=−5.39, p&amp;lt;0.001). Mean fluoroscopy time (23.96±8.90 vs 17.81±5.72 min) and contrast volume (259.23±59.45 vs 232.58±96.18 ml) were significantly higher in two stents group than single stent group (p=0.049). However the angiographic success rates (residual stenosis ≤30% and restoration of TIMI flow grade II or III) were comparable (96.8% vs 99%, MC p=0.151). There is no significant difference regarding the overall incidence rate of MACCE in both groups 6 months following the index procedure (13.9% vs 16.9%, FEp=0.698), with no difference between different bifurcation stenting techniques in patients managed with two stents Conclusion Although two stents strategy in the setting of STEMI is much complex with more fluoroscopy time and contrast volume, the procedural success rate and the incidence of complications between two groups were comparable on the medium-term follow up Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

Ten-Year Trends in Coronary Bifurcation Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Prognostic Effects of Patient and Lesion Characteristics, Devices, and Techniques.

BackgroundDespite advances in devices and techniques, coronary bifurcation lesion remains a challenging lesion subset in the field of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We evaluate 10‐year trends in bifurcation PCI and their effects on patient outcomes.Methods and ResultsWe analyzed 10‐year trends in patient/lesion characteristics, devices, PCI strategy, stent optimization techniques, and clinical outcomes using data from 5498 patients who underwent bifurcation PCI from 2004 to 2015. Clinical outcomes 2 years after the index procedure were evaluated in terms of target vessel failure (a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization) and a patient‐oriented composite outcome (a composite of all‐cause death, myocardial infarction, and any revascularization). During the 10‐year study period, patient and lesion complexity, such as multivessel disease, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, and left main bifurcation, increased continuously (all P<0.001). The risk of target vessel failure or patient‐oriented composite outcome decreased continuously from 2004 to 2015 (target vessel failure: from 12.3% to 6.9%, log‐rank P<0.001; patient‐oriented composite outcome: from 13.6% to 9.3%, log‐rank P<0.001). The use of a second‐generation drug‐eluting stent and decreased target vessel failure risk in true bifurcation lesions were the major contributors to improved patient prognosis (interaction P values were <0.001 and 0.013, respectively).ConclusionsDuring the past decade of bifurcation PCI, patient and lesion characteristics, devices, PCI techniques, and patient prognosis have all significantly changed. Despite increased patient and lesion complexity, clinical outcomes after bifurcation PCI have improved, mainly because of better devices and more widespread adoption of procedural optimization techniques and appropriate treatment strategies.RegistrationURL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifiers: NCT01642992 and NCT03068494.

Association of peri-procedural myocardial infarction with mortality after stenting true coronary bifurcation lesions: A pooled individual participant data analysis from four randomized controlled trials.

Five definitions of peri-procedural myocardial infarction (PMI) following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are used in clinical trials; their clinical relevance in coronary bifurcation stenting remains unclear. To understand the correlation between PMI and mortality in bifurcation lesions from the DKCRUSH studies. PMI was defined using serum creatine kinase-myocardial band (CK-MB) values within 48 h of PCI according to the SYNTAX, Fourth Universal Definition of MI (4th UDMI), ISCHEMIA, SCAI, and EXCEL definitions. Overall, 1300 patients with both CK and CK-MB measurements pre- and post-stenting were evaluated. The association of each PMI type and all-cause death or cardiac death at a median of 5.58 years of follow-up was analyzed using Cox regression. In total, 56 (4.3%) patients had PMI. According to SYNTAX, 4th UDMI or ISCHEMIA, SCAI, and EXCEL definitions, PMI occurred in 21 (1.6%), 56 (4.3%), 29 (2.2%), and 32 (2.5%) patients, respectively. All definitions were significantly correlated with unadjusted mortality at the end of follow-up but not at 30 days or 1-year after stenting. PMI using SYNTAX, SCAI, and EXCEL definitions rather than 4th UDMI definition was strongly associated with adjusted all-cause death. By adjusted analysis, PMI according to 4th UDMI, SCAI, and EXCEL definitions but not SYNTAX definition was positively correlated with cardiac death at a median of 5.58 years of follow-up. CK-MB ≥ 5 x UNL strongly enhanced the correlation of CK-MB values with mortality. PMI rate varies with the definition following stenting for bifurcation lesions. PMI defined by SCAI and EXCEL definitions is strongly correlates with adjusted all-cause and cardiac death.

Feasibility and efficacy of an ultra-short side branch-dedicated balloon in coronary bifurcation stenting.

Side branch (SB) dilation with an ultra-short balloon after main vessel (MV) stenting may minimise stent failure in coronary bifurcation lesions. We sought to investigate the feasibility and efficacy of the Glider balloon (GB), a side branch (SB)-dedicated balloon 4 mm in length, in coronary bifurcation stenting. In bench testing, stent configuration was examined with micro-focus computed tomography after crossover stenting followed by GB dilation or kissing balloon inflation (KBI). In the clinical study we performed GB dilatation after MV stenting for 207 lesions in 194 patients. Failure of the GB dilation and additional procedures due to inducible stent failure were investigated as well as adverse cardiac events at 1-year follow-up. In bench testing GB dilation maintained cross-sectional stent area without significant deformation and presented effective jailed strut removal in a high-angled bifurcation model. In the clinical study the cohort included left main, true bifurcation lesion, and two-stent treatment in 42.0%, 45.9%, and 14.0%, respectively. The proximal optimisation technique (POT) or POT-like inflation was performed in 82.1%. GB crossing failure, SB stenting due to dissection, and stent deformation requiring correction by KBI or MV dilation occurred in 8.7%, 1.4%, and 5.8%, respectively. Finally, simple GB dilation without KBI was completed in 91.8% for SB dilation. At one-year follow-up, target lesion revascularisation, cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and stent thrombosis were found in 7.2%, 2.1%, 2.1%, and 1.0%, respectively. Simple GB dilation after adequate expansion of the proximal MV stent provided acceptable acute and long-term results as an alternative to KBI.

Effect of Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Angioplasty on Side Branch Lesion and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with De Novo True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

To compare the effects of paclitaxal-coated balloon (PCB) versus conventional balloon (CB) on side branch (SB) lesion and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with de novo true bifurcation lesions. In total, 219 patients with de novo true bifurcation lesions were enrolled and divided into PCB group (102 cases) and CB group (117 cases) according to angioplasty strategy in SB. Drug-eluting stent (DES) was implanted in main vessel (MV) for each subject. All subjects underwent a 12-month follow-up for late lumen loss (LLL), restenosis, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). MACEs included cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and unstable angina requiring admission. There were no differences in diameter, minimum lumen diameter (MLD), and stenosis for bifurcation lesions between the two groups before and immediately after PCI (P > 0.05). After 12-month follow-up, no differences occurred in MV-MLD and MV-LLL between the two groups (P > 0.05); SB-MLD in PCB group was higher than that in CB group (1.97 ± 0.36mm vs. 1.80 ± 0.43mm, P = 0.007); SB-LLL in PCB group was lower than that in CB group (0.11 ± 0.18mm vs. 0.19 ± 0.25mm, P = 0.024). Multivariate COX analyses indicated that PCB group had lower MACE risk than CB group (HR = 0.480, 95%CI 0.244-0.941, P = 0.033). PCB could decrease SB-LLL and MACE risk in patients with de novo true coronary bifurcation lesion 12months after single-DES intervention.

A Novel guide extension assisted stenting technique for coronary bifurcation lesions.

A challenging technical scenario frequently encountered in a percutaneous coronary intervention of a coronary bifurcation lesion (CBL) is stent implantation of only the stenosed segment without compromising the other two normal segments in non-true bifurcation lesions. Another is precise stent implantation covering the side branch ostium without leaving excessive stent metal at the other two segments of a bifurcation lesion in complex true bifurcation lesions. The aim of this study was to describe a novel stenting technique for both non-true and true CBLs by using a guide extension catheter (GuideLiner). With the assistance of a guide extension catheter mounted on both the main and the side-branch guidewires and with its intubation down to the bifurcation carina, a stent can be implanted in the side branch segment or distal main segment of the bifurcation lesion appropriately without compromising the other two segments of the coronary bifurcation. Stent implantation is described in three bifurcation lesions in three cases and shown in detail with illustrative figures. The technique facilitates side-branch only stenting in side-branch mono-ostial (medina 0, 0, 1) CBL or only the distal main segment in distal mono-ostial (medina 0, 1, 0) CBL without compromising the other two remaining segments when using the one-stent technique in non-true CBLs without leaving unnecessary excessive stent metal at the bifurcation site and when using a two-stent technique in complex true bifurcation lesions (tri-ostial or medina 1, 1, 1). Consequently, through optimizing stent deployment, the technique may have the potential to reduce the risk of subacute stent thrombosis and future in-stent restenosis. The most appropriate lesions suitable for the technique, and some other practical tips are also described.

The European bifurcation club Left Main Coronary Stent study: a randomized comparison of stepwise provisional vs. systematic dual stenting strategies (EBC MAIN).

Patients with non-left-main coronary bifurcation lesions are usually best treated with a stepwise provisional approach. However, patients with true left main stem bifurcation lesions have been shown in one dedicated randomized study to benefit from systematic dual stent implantation. Four hundred and sixty-seven patients with true left main stem bifurcation lesions requiring intervention were recruited to the EBC MAIN study in 11 European countries. Patients were aged 71 ± 10 years; 77% were male. Patients were randomly allocated to a stepwise layered provisional strategy (n = 230) or a systematic dual stent approach (n = 237). The primary endpoint (a composite of death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization at 12 months) occurred in 14.7% of the stepwise provisional group vs. 17.7% of the systematic dual stent group (hazard ratio 0.8, 95% confidence interval 0.5-1.3; P = 0.34). Secondary endpoints were death (3.0% vs. 4.2%, P = 0.48), myocardial infarction (10.0% vs. 10.1%, P = 0.91), target lesion revascularization (6.1% vs. 9.3%, P = 0.16), and stent thrombosis (1.7% vs. 1.3%, P = 0.90), respectively. Procedure time, X-ray dose and consumables favoured the stepwise provisional approach. Symptomatic improvement was excellent and equal in each group. Among patients with true bifurcation left main stem stenosis requiring intervention, fewer major adverse cardiac events occurred with a stepwise layered provisional approach than with planned dual stenting, although the difference was not statistically significant. The stepwise provisional strategy should remain the default for distal left main stem bifurcation intervention. http://clinicaltrials.gov NCT02497014.

Comparison of long-term radial artery occlusion following trans-radial coronary intervention using 6-french versus 7-french sheaths.

The aim of this study was to explore the impact of 6-Fr and 7-Fr sheaths on the incidence of long-term radial artery occlusion (RAO) after trans-radial coronary intervention (TRI). From September 2013 to January 2016, patients with ischemic heart disease including acute myocardial infarction and true bifurcation lesions were randomly assigned to 6-Fr group and 7-Fr group immediately after coronary angiography in a 1:1 ratio. The radial artery diameters were observed by ultrasound examination one day prior to TRI as well as at 30 days and 1 year after TRI. The primary endpoint was the incidence of RAO at 1-year after TRI. The secondary endpoints were the incidence of local vascular complications during hospitalization and changes of radial artery diameters within 1-year after TRI between the two groups. Additionally, multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to explore potential factors related to the incidence of long-term RAO after TRI. A total of 214 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to 6-Fr group (n = 105) or 7-Fr group (n = 109). There was no significant difference in the incidence of RAO at 1-year after TRI (8.57% vs. 12.84%, p = 0.313). Moreover, no significant difference was observed in the incidence of local vascular complications during hospitalization (20% vs. 24.77%, p = 0.403). After 1-year follow-up, no significant difference was found in radial artery diameters (2.63 ± 0.31 mm vs. 2.64 ± 0.27 mm, p = 0.802). Multivariate logistic analysis revealed that repeated TRI was an independent risk factor of long-term RAO 1 year after TRI (OR = 10.316, 95% CI 2.928-36.351, p = 0.001). Compared to 6-Fr sheath, 7-Fr sheath did not increase short-term or long-term incidence of RAO after TRI.

Comparison of intravascular ultrasound-guided with angiography-guided double kissing crush stenting for patients with complex coronary bifurcation lesions: Rationale and design of a prospective, randomized, and multicenter DKCRUSH VIII trial

Double kissing (DK) crush approach for patients with coronary bifurcation lesions, particularly localized at distal left main or lesions with increased complexity, is associated with significant reduction in clinical events when compared with provisional stenting. Recently, randomized clinical trial has demonstrated the net clinical benefits by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided implantation of drug-eluting stent in all-comers. However, the improvement in clinical outcome after DK crush treatment guided by IVUS over angiography guidance for patients with complex bifurcation lesions have never been studied in a randomized fashion. DKCRUSH VIII study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial designed to assess superiority of IVUS-guided vs angiography-guided DK crush stenting in patients with complex bifurcation lesions according to DEFINITION criteria. A total of 556 patients with complex bifurcation lesions will be randomly (1:1 of ratio) assigned to IVUS-guided or angiography-guided DK crush stenting group. The primary end point is the rate of 12-month target vessel failure, including cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or clinically driven target vessel revascularization. The secondary end points consist of the individual component of primary end point, all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and in-stent restenosis. The safety end point is the incidence of definite or probable stent thrombosis. An angiographic follow-up will be performed for all patients at 13 months and clinical follow-up will be continued annually until 3 years after the index procedure. DKCRUSH VIII trial is the first study designed to evaluate the differences in efficacy and safety between IVUS-guided and angiography-guided DK crush stenting in patients with complex true bifurcation lesions. This study will also provide IVUS-derived criteria to define optimal DK crush stenting for bifurcation lesions at higher complexity.

Association of Side-Branch Treatment and Patient Factors in Left Anterior Descending Artery True Bifurcation Lesions: Analysis from the GRAND-DES Pooled Registry.

Methods Patients undergoing PCI to left anterior descending (LAD) bifurcation lesions with contemporary DES were analyzed from a nationwide registry. Baseline risk was assessed using the Age, Creatinine, and Ejection Fraction (ACEF) score. Target lesion failure (TLF), a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization, was assessed at 3 years. Results Among 1,089 patients with LAD bifurcation lesions, 548 (50.3%) patients underwent SB treatment. The SB treatment group showed a nonsignificant, but numerically lower rate of 3-year TLF (6.6% vs. 9.2%, HR 0.75, 95%CI 0.44–1.28, p = 0.29). In patients with low pretreatment risk (ACEF<1.22), SB treatment was associated with a lower rate of 3-year TLF (HR 0.43, 95%CI 0.19–0.96, p = 0.04), while no significant difference was observed in patients with high risk (ACEF≥1.22). The difference in the low risk group was mostly driven by target lesion revascularization (HR 0.24, 95%CI 0.08–0.75, p = 0.01). Conclusions SB treatment for LAD bifurcation lesions showed favorable long-term outcomes compared with main-branch-only intervention, especially in patients with low pretreatment risk.