You have accessJournal of UrologyProstate Cancer: Detection and Screening1 Apr 2011843 COMPARISON OF PROSTATE CANCER DETECTION RATE BETWEEN PROSTATE BIOPSY PERFORMED WITH END-FIRE SINGLE-PLANE AND DUAL-PLANE TRANSRECTAL PROBE Marco Raber, Carmen Maccagnano, Diego Angiolilli, Federico Dehò, Marco Roscigno, Antonino Saccà, Niccolò Maria Passoni, Nicola Fossati, Matteo Ferrari, Vincenzo Scattoni, Patrizio Rigatti, and Francesco Montorsi Marco RaberMarco Raber Milan, Italy More articles by this author , Carmen MaccagnanoCarmen Maccagnano Milan, Italy More articles by this author , Diego AngiolilliDiego Angiolilli Milan, Italy More articles by this author , Federico DehòFederico Dehò Milan, Italy More articles by this author , Marco RoscignoMarco Roscigno Milan, Italy More articles by this author , Antonino SaccàAntonino Saccà Milan, Italy More articles by this author , Niccolò Maria PassoniNiccolò Maria Passoni Milan, Italy More articles by this author , Nicola FossatiNicola Fossati Milan, Italy More articles by this author , Matteo FerrariMatteo Ferrari Milan, Italy More articles by this author , Vincenzo ScattoniVincenzo Scattoni Milan, Italy More articles by this author , Patrizio RigattiPatrizio Rigatti Milan, Italy More articles by this author , and Francesco MontorsiFrancesco Montorsi Milan, Italy More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.02.664AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy is the standard procedure to diagnose prostate cancer. The impact of ultrasound probe on detection rate has not been clarified yet. METHODS From January 2004 to March 2006, 800 consecutive patients were randomised by a single operator to undergo a first prostate biopsy with single-plane (400 patients, Group 1) and dual-plane ultrasound probe (400 patients, Group 2), using the same biopsy protocol. All patients received local anesthesia and antibiotic prophylaxis. Biopsies were taken with the patient in the left lateral decubitus position. A 18-gauge Tru-cut needle powered by a biopsy gun was used. In all cases, 14 core biopsy samples were taken. On each side, three prostate cores were obtained from each peripheral side and two from the apical margin and base. Two different ultrasound probes were used: the side-fire probe, and the end-fire probe (Hitachi Medical Systems). The primary end point was to evaluate whether the detection rate may differ using two different biopsy probes. RESULTS Overall prostate cancer detection rate was 36,2%. No significant difference in detection rate was found between single-plane and dual-plane untrasound transrectal probe (P=0,51). In multivariable analyses, after adjusting for prostate volume, transizion zone volume, total PSA, free PSA, percent of free PSA, DRE and TRUS results no statistical differences between the two probes were detected (all p>0.2). CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest the use of either a single-plane end-fire or a dual-plane side-fire transrectal ustrasonographyc probe is not affecting the prostate cancer detection rate in extended biopsies. © 2011 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 185Issue 4SApril 2011Page: e339 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2011 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Marco Raber Milan, Italy More articles by this author Carmen Maccagnano Milan, Italy More articles by this author Diego Angiolilli Milan, Italy More articles by this author Federico Dehò Milan, Italy More articles by this author Marco Roscigno Milan, Italy More articles by this author Antonino Saccà Milan, Italy More articles by this author Niccolò Maria Passoni Milan, Italy More articles by this author Nicola Fossati Milan, Italy More articles by this author Matteo Ferrari Milan, Italy More articles by this author Vincenzo Scattoni Milan, Italy More articles by this author Patrizio Rigatti Milan, Italy More articles by this author Francesco Montorsi Milan, Italy More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Read full abstract