Tropisetron In Patients Research Articles

Effect of intravenous tropisetron on modulation of pain and central hypersensitivity in chronic low back pain patients

The activation of 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 (5-HT-3) receptors in spinal cord can enhance intrinsic spinal mechanisms of central hypersensitivity, possibly leading to exaggerated pain responses. Clinical studies suggest that 5-HT-3 receptor antagonists may have an analgesic effect. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study tested the hypothesis that the 5-HT-3 receptor antagonist tropisetron attenuates pain and central hypersensitivity in patients with chronic low back pain. Thirty patients with chronic low back pain, 15 of whom were women (aged 53 ± 14 years) and 15 men (aged 48 ± 14 years), were studied. A single intravenous injection of 0.9% saline solution, tropisetron 2 mg, and tropisetron 5 mg was administrated in 3 different sessions, in a double-blind crossover manner. The main outcome was the visual analogue scale (VAS) score of spontaneous low back pain before, and 15, 30, 60, and 90 minutes after drug administration. Secondary outcomes were nociceptive withdrawal reflexes to single and repeated electrical stimulation, area of reflex receptive fields, pressure pain detection and tolerance thresholds, conditioned pain modulation, and area of clinical pain. The data were analyzed by analysis of variance and panel multiple regressions. All 3 treatments reduced VAS scores. However, there was no statistically significant difference between tropisetron and placebo in VAS scores. Compared to placebo, tropisetron produced a statistically significant increase in pain threshold after single electrical stimulation, but no difference in all other secondary outcomes was found. A single-dose intravenous administration of tropisetron in patients with chronic low back pain had no significant specific effect on intensity of pain and most parameters of central hypersensitivity.

A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of tropisetron in patients with schizophrenia.

BackgroundCognitive deficits in schizophrenia are associated with psychosocial deficits that are primarily responsible for the poor long-term outcome of this disease. Auditory sensory gating P50 deficits are correlated with neuropsychological deficits in attention, one of the principal cognitive disturbances in schizophrenia. Our studies suggest that the α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (α7 nAChR) agonist tropisetron might be a potential therapeutic drug for cognitive deficits in schizophrenia. Therefore, it is of particular interest to investigate the effects of tropisetron on the cognitive deficits in patients with schizophrenia.MethodsA randomised, placebo-controlled trial of tropisetron in patients with schizophrenia was performed. A total of 40 patients with chronic schizophrenia who had taken risperidone (2 to 6 mg/day) were enrolled. Subjects were randomly assigned to a fixed titration of tropisetron (n = 20, 10 mg/day) or placebo (n = 20) in an 8-week double-blind trial. Auditory sensory gating P50 deficits and Quality of Life Scale (QLS), Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB), and Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) scores were measured.ResultsIn all, 33 patients completed the trial. Tropisetron was well tolerated. Administration of tropisetron, but not placebo, significantly improved auditory sensory gating P50 deficits in non-smoking patients with schizophrenia. The score on the rapid visual information processing (sustained visual attention) task of CANTAB was significantly improved by tropisetron treatment. Total and subscale scores of PANSS were not changed by this trial. QLS scores in the all patients, but not non-smoking patients, were significantly improved by tropisetron trial.ConclusionsThis first randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial supports the safety and efficacy of adjunctive tropisetron for treatment of cognitive deficits in schizophrenia.

Efficacy of tropisetron in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy with carboplatin and taxanes

Even though significant progress has been made, chemotherapy-induced emesis remains a challenging problem. Few studies focus on emesis in patients treated with carboplatin and the observation period is limited to the initial 24 h following chemotherapy. Thus, we investigated if tropisetron (T) monotherapy can adequately prevent acute and delayed emesis in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving a moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC) (carboplatin-containing) regimen. Furthermore, we explored the merits of adding dexamethasone (D) or alprazolam (A) to T, especially in the setting of a pre-existing high level of stress. We studied 60 patients with advanced NSCLC receiving carboplatin and taxanes in three consecutive cycles. During the first cycle, patients received 5 mg of T intravenously before chemotherapy and the same dose per os on each of the following 3 days. In the second cycle, T was co-administered with 8 mg of D once a day, while, during the third cycle, T was combined with per os A 0.25 mg every 12 h and continued over the following 3 days. Finally, we evaluated the impact of stress on the anti-emetic response achieved with the previously described regimens. The combination of T + A was superior to T monotherapy and the combination of T + D, regarding the prevention of acute and delayed emesis. Both T + A and T + D combinations led to appetite improvement, while patients receiving T + A experienced sedation more frequently. Interestingly, subgroup analysis revealed that patients without underlying stress obtained no further benefit by the addition of A or D, while both T + A and T + D combinations led to a better anti-emetic response in patients with stress. In conclusion, T monotherapy provides a satisfactory result in controlling nausea and emesis caused by a MEC regimen in patients without stress. However, the addition of D and, mainly, A improves its anti-emetic effect in patients with obvious stress.

Granisetron versus tropisetron for prophylaxis of acute chemotherapy-induced emesis: a pooled analysis

This analysis compares the antiemetic efficacy of the 5-HT3-receptor antagonists granisetron and tropisetron in acute chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). All published randomized studies comparing granisetron with tropisetron in conventionally-dosed, emetogenic chemotherapy are included in this pooled analysis. The target criterion for antiemetic success was 'acute complete response' (complete absence of vomiting in the 24 h after the start of chemotherapy) and the rate of successful treatment reported as 'response rate' (acute complete response rate per patient). Twelve studies were used comprising 810 patients. Comparison between granisetron and tropisetron in patients receiving cisplatin-based therapy showed superiority of granisetron (odds ratio above 1.0) in six out of seven studies. However, this difference did not reach statistical significance. In patients receiving noncisplatin-based therapies, four out of five studies showed an advantage of granisetron over tropisetron with one study showing a significant advantage. Pooled analysis of all studies demonstrated a significant overall advantage for granisetron over tropisetron (p=0.042). This is supported by the individual studies: overall, ten out of the 12 studies analyzed showed an advantage for granisetron, with a 6.4% difference in response rate. This advantage was more pronounced in noncisplatin-based therapy (7.3%), whereas in cisplatin-based therapy, the difference was 5.4%. The overall results of this pooled analysis of cisplatin and noncisplatin-based studies suggest that granisetron has a marginal but clinically potentially relevant statistically significant advantage in efficacy over tropisetron for the control of acute CINV.

Intra‐articular treatment of arthritides and activated osteoarthritis with the 5‐HT3 receptor antagonist tropisetron. A double‐blind study compared with methylprednisolone

Background: Since the good effect of intra‐articular injections of the 5‐HT3 receptor antagonist tropisetron in patients with arthritides and activated osteoarthritis has already been demonstrated in pilot studies, the effect of tropisetron is compared with that of methylprednisolone here.Objectives: In a double‐blind study, 34 patients with gonarthritides or activated osteoarthritis (18 patients with rheumatoid arthritis, 16 patients with osteoarthritis) were treated with a single intra‐articular injection of 10 mg tropisetron (18 patients) or 40 mg methylprednisolone (16 patients). Before treatment as well as one and three weeks later, the intensity of rest pain and pain following exercise was measured with the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and the clinical findings in the knee joint were recorded.Results: By means of the intra‐articular tropisetron treatment, the inflammatory joint process with arthritides and activated arthroses could be influenced in a similar way as with corticosteroid treatment. No significant differences were detected.Conclusion: According to the results presented here, the intra‐articular treatment with the 5‐HT3 receptor antagonist tropisetron in patients with gonarthritides and activated arthroses was about equally effective as those for treatment with corticosteroids. Therefore, it can be used as an alternative in patients for whom concomitant diseases like diabetes and hypertension make it difficult to use corticosteroids. Whether increasing the tropisetron dose may further improve the results remains to be determined in future studies.

Trigger point injection treatment with the 5‐HT3 receptor antagonist tropisetron in patients with late whiplash‐associated disorderFirst results of a multiple case study

Preliminary results of an ongoing study on the effectiveness of trigger point injections with tropisetron in 20 patients with late whiplash‐associated disorder are presented. The study demonstrated more than 50% pain relief for more than 2 weeks in 52% of the 73 treatment sessions. The duration of effectiveness of the injections showed great intraindividual and interindividual variation.

Review of the preclinical pharmacology and comparative efficacy of 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonists for chemotherapy-induced emesis.

This analysis was undertaken to review published reports of the comparative efficacy and safety of 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 (5-HT3) receptor antagonists in the prophylaxis of acute chemotherapy-induced emesis. Comparison data used are the preclinical pharmacology as well as the design and results of clinical trials. Seven comparative studies that used granisetron, ondansetron, or tropisetron in patients who received either moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy are reviewed. As the study designs, patient population, chemotherapy, antiemetic doses and schedule, and methods of assessment were slightly different, the results of each study are analyzed independently. Effectiveness is assessed by emetic episodes, nausea, and patient preference. The preclinical pharmacologic profile is different among the 5-HT3 antagonists in terms of potency, selectivity, dose response, and duration of action. The comparative clinical trials show that a single intravenous (i.v.) dose of granisetron 3 mg is as effective as multiple (8 mg x 3) or single (32 mg) i.v. doses of ondansetron for the prevention of acute nausea and emesis due to cisplatin. In the two moderately emetogenic clinical trials, granisetron 3 mg i.v. was at least as effective as ondansetron 8 mg i.v. +/- 24 mg orally and tropisetron 5 mg i.v. Patient preference was evaluated in three of the four crossover trials: granisetron was preferred in three of four, and no preference was reported in the fourth. The one trial to compare ondansetron 0.15 mg/kg x 3 versus granisetron 10 micrograms/kg x 1 or granisetron 40 micrograms/kg i.v. demonstrated equivalent control of nausea and vomiting in patients who received cisplatin-based chemotherapy. The 5-HT3 receptor antagonists compared are highly effective antiemetic agents that have now become the standard of care for preventing chemotherapy-induced emesis. Whether the described preclinical differences among these agents are also clinically significant remains to be seen. In the comparative trials analyzed, the 5-HT3 receptor antagonists demonstrated relatively equivalent clinical efficacy. Cost analysis may favor the use of one agent over another depending on the emetogenic challenge, dose of the 5-HT3 antagonists, and number of doses recommended. Patient preference may be an important factor to be considered in future antiemetic trials.

Helicobacter Pylori produces tetrahydroharman from alcohol and tryptamine

The activation of 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 (5-HT-3) receptors in spinal cord can enhance intrinsic spinal mechanisms of central hypersensitivity, possibly leading to exaggerated pain responses. Clinical studies suggest that 5-HT-3 receptor antagonists may have an analgesic effect. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study tested the hypothesis that the 5-HT-3 receptor antagonist tropisetron attenuates pain and central hypersensitivity in patients with chronic low back pain. Thirty patients with chronic low back pain, 15 of whom were women (aged 53 ± 14 years) and 15 men (aged 48 ± 14 years), were studied. A single intravenous injection of 0.9% saline solution, tropisetron 2 mg, and tropisetron 5 mg was administrated in 3 different sessions, in a double-blind crossover manner. The main outcome was the visual analogue scale (VAS) score of spontaneous low back pain before, and 15, 30, 60, and 90 minutes after drug administration. Secondary outcomes were nociceptive withdrawal reflexes to single and repeated electrical stimulation, area of reflex receptive fields, pressure pain detection and tolerance thresholds, conditioned pain modulation, and area of clinical pain. The data were analyzed by analysis of variance and panel multiple regressions. All 3 treatments reduced VAS scores. However, there was no statistically significant difference between tropisetron and placebo in VAS scores. Compared to placebo, tropisetron produced a statistically significant increase in pain threshold after single electrical stimulation, but no difference in all other secondary outcomes was found. A single-dose intravenous administration of tropisetron in patients with chronic low back pain had no significant specific effect on intensity of pain and most parameters of central hypersensitivity.

The anti-emetic efficacy and tolerability of tropisetron in patients conditioned with high-dose chemotherapy (with and without total body irradiation) prior to bone marrow transplantation

Nausea and vomiting are among the most distressing side-effects of chemoradiotherapy. Conditioning protocols for patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation consist of highly emetogenic high-dose chemotherapy with or without total body irradiation. Marked improvement in controlling emesis and nausea was achieved by the introduction of a new class of antiemetic drugs, the 5HT3 serotonin-receptor antagonists. Tropisetron is a highly potent, selective antagonist of 5HT3 receptors. Previous studies have used a single 5-mg dose i.v. of tropisetron to control nausea and vomiting in cancer patients. The present study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a single daily dose of tropisetron in controlling emesis in patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy (with or without total body irradiation) prior to bone marrow transplantation. The anti-emetic efficacy was investigated in a non-homogeneous cohort in a prospective and open study. Of 11 patients evaluated, 9 (81%) showed complete or major control, 1 (9%) minor control and 1 (9%) failed to respond. The most common adverse events reported during the study included diarrhea (46%) and headache (18%), no patients being withdrawn because of side-effects. Our data suggest that a single 5-mg i.v. dose of tropisetron is safe and effective in preventing chemotherapy-induced emesis in patients receiving bone marrow transplantation conditioning. A larger randomized study is warranted to confirm our preliminary results.

Compassionate use of tropisetron in patients at high risk of severe emesis

Tropisetron is a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist which suppresses nausea and vomiting induced by cancer chemotherapeutic agents. In this study, tropisetron was evaluated on a compassionate-need basis in 545 cancer patients who had either proved refractory to antiemetic treatment during previous chemotherapy or who were at high risk of emesis as a result of current therapy. Tropisetron (5 mg or 10 mg) was administered as a 15-minute infusion prior to chemotherapy, with the further possibility of an additional dose, either orally or parenterally, on one or more subsequent days. In some patients the drug was administered orally on the day before treatment. On Day 1 of Course 1, 64.7% of patients had a complete response to tropisetron, i.e. no nausea or vomiting, and 26.9% of patients had a partial response. More than 80% of patients with a complete response in Course 1 had a complete response in Course 2 and of the partial responders in Course 1, 37% achieved a complete response in Course 2. Of the 7.6% failures in Course 1, a further 26% achieved a complete response in Course 2. Tropisetron was well tolerated, with adverse effects recorded in only 45 (8%) patients.

Anti-emetic efficacy & tolerability of tropisetron in patients (PTS) conditioned with high dose chemoradiotherapy (HDC) pre-bone marrow transplantation (BMT)

Anti-emetic efficacy & tolerability of tropisetron in patients (PTS) conditioned with high dose chemoradiotherapy (HDC) pre-bone marrow transplantation (BMT)