As the international community is gearing towards shifting values andattitudes making adjustments in trending environmental protectioncampaigns, the accepted paradigm points towards the need to minimize theimpacts on mountain landscapes subjected to climate change due to globalwarming. Hitherto, research policy and the subsequent funding for proposalsdealing with climate change have emphasized the physical dimension,mainly on the cryosphere with glacial retreat and glacier ablation, and on thehydrosphere with lack or rain-fed snow, erratic precipitation, diminishingwater bodies and minimized aquifers. It is just recently, however, that thehuman dimension has been incorporated as a major pillar for ourunderstanding of landscape change and the recent emphasis for fundedresearch.In the tropical mountain areas of the Americas, this social sciencesapproach to study climate change is particularly important, because of theancient imprint on the land has often taken as an anecdotal outcome of sorts,whereby the use of different strategies, Andean communities have copedwith changes in the land for many reasons, including climate change. Theneoliberal policies that facilitated the opening of free market economies intoonce isolated mountain systems are been tested in scenarios of poverty,marginality and neglect. Andean communities are facing major changes, notonly due to global climate change, but particularly because of the impact ofglobalization in their ways of life. Entire livelihoods are threatened with the