profiles ISSN 1948-6596 Interview with John C. Briggs, recipient of the 2005 Alfred Rus- sel Wallace award by Brian W. Bowen 1 Hawaii Institute of Marine Biology, University of Hawaii, Kaneohe, HI, USA Brian W. Bowen. Your autobiography (A Professo- rial Life, Xlibris 2009) describes conditions at eight academic institutions across seven decades. What trends did you see in academia over that time, and where are biological departments headed today? John C. Briggs. From the 1940s to the present time, research in biology departments has under- gone three major changes: from (1) problems that involved the study of whole organisms to (2) an increasing emphasis on experimental genetics, embryology, and physiology from the 1940s to the 1980s, and then (3) the rise of molecular biology from 1980 onward. But now a fourth change, an upsurge of interest in environmental biology, is having a profound effect. The course work offered in biology departments has generally followed these trends, and departmental organization has been affected to the point where some depart- ments have become split into two or three differ- ent entities. Beginning in the 1990s, biologists began to take an interest in the number of species that in- habited the world, and the fact that human altera- tion of the environment was probably eliminating many of them before they had even been de- scribed. These findings energized various private organizations and governmental agencies to the point where saving the environment and the spe- cies within it became the great conservation goal. In many institutions the environmental ethic has spread to numerous departments (law, engineer- ing, geology, social science) and it is often possible for students to major in environmental science. In biology, this has led to a new emphasis on tradi- tional studies such as morphology and systematics and a renewed appreciation for the value of natu- ral history collections. BWB. Across the timeframe of your career, what are the greatest successes in biogeography, and what is the most surprising change? JCB. During my career, the most successful inno- vation and the greatest impetus to biogeographi- cal research was the invention of phylogeography, i.e., the application of molecular methods to re- veal the genetic relationship of species and higher taxa. This advance, primarily attributable to John Avise and his students, has become an integral part of biogeography. Phylogeography has solved, and is continuing to solve, problems that have perplexed generations of biogeographers. The growth of phylogeography has been both surpris- ing and beneficial. The next most influential advance was due to the contributions of several paleontologists over recent years. They found that the generation of the earth’s latitudinal biodiversity pattern was primarily due to the continuing movement of tropical lineages toward the poles. This demon- strated that the tropics were the main fount of diversity for all latitudes. As a result, it became clear that the tropics, and particularly the high diversity centers within them, should become a first priority for conservation efforts. BWB. You witnessed the rise of cladistic biogeog- raphy, and opposed their interpretation of species distributions by strict vicariance. How would you characterize the vicariance/dispersal debate to- day? JCB. Cladistic biogeography was the result of an uneasy alliance between those who believed in cladistics, a systematic procedure, and those who were advocates of panbiogeography, formation of species by continental movement. The difficulty was that cladistics originally included the recogni- tion of dispersal as an integral part of the phyloge- netic process. But the vicarianists did not believe that biogeographic patterns could be formed by dispersal. Nevertheless, the name “cladistic bio- © 2010 the authors; journal compilation © 2010 The International Biogeography Society — frontiers of biogeography 2.3, 2010
Read full abstract