Triple Combination Therapy Research Articles

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy plus targeted therapy and immunotherapy versus systemic chemotherapy for advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a retrospective cohort study.

To improve the prognosis of advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA), we retrospectively compared the effect and safety of combined hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC), targeted therapy and immunotherapy with systemic chemotherapy (SC) in unresectable iCCA patients. We retrospectively enrolled 202 advanced iCCA patients treated with SC or targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and FOLFOX-HAIC combined between March 2015 and June 2023 at our institution. 202 patients were divided into two groups based on the therapeutic regimens. Baseline characteristics and prognosis were reviewed and analyzed. After 1-to-1 propensity score matching, 76 patients were included in each group. The triple combination therapy group demonstrated longer median overall survival (OS, 20.77 vs. 14.83 months, P=0.047), progression-free survival (PFS, 9.07 vs. 6.23mo, P<0.001), intrahepatic PFS (11.03 vs. 6.73mo, P<0.001), extrahepatic PFS (11.37 vs. 7.13 months, P=0.0064), and a higher objective response rate (35.5% vs. 14.5%, P=0.003) than the SC group. Fever, thrombocytopenia, elevated ALT, elevated AST, hypoalbuminemia, and hyperbilirubinemia were more common adverse events (AEs) in the triple combination therapy group, while fatigue and anemia were more prevalent in the SC group (P<0.05). For grades 3-4 AEs, the rates of elevated ALT were higher in the triple combination group (P=0.028). Compared with SC, triple combination therapy comprising HAIC, targeted therapy and immunotherapy appears to be an effective and safe treatment for advanced iCCA.

Four-Strata Risk Assessment in Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Treated with Selexipag in Real-World Settings (EXPOSURE Study).

Risk assessment can aid management of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and clinical decision-making. This analysis describes characteristics, treatment patterns and outcomes of patients with PAH, categorised by risk status at time of treatment escalation with selexipag in clinical settings. Patients initiating selexipag in the ongoing multicentre, prospective EXPOSURE (EUPAS19085) study were grouped as low, intermediate-low, intermediate-high or high risk of 1-year mortality according to the ESC/ERS 4-strata method. As of November 2022, 77% (535/698) of patients initiating selexipag had data allowing for risk calculation; 14% (N = 76) were low, 31% (N = 168) intermediate-low, 34% (N = 182) intermediate-high and 20% (N = 109) high risk of 1-year mortality. Overall, patients were predominantly female (71%), with idiopathic/heritable PAH (56%) or PAH associated with connective tissue disease (CTD-PAH; 27%), median age of 60years and prevalent (2years) disease. From low to high risk, proportion of CTD-PAH and age increased (from 12%-40% and 46-68years, respectively); time from diagnosis decreased and presence of cardiovascular risk factors increased. Most patients across risk groups (74-81%) initiated selexipag as part of triple oral combination therapy. Overall median (Q1, Q3) selexipag exposure duration was 10.1 (3.5, 24.1) months. Proportions of hospitalised patients increased with increasing risk group (16-42% from low to high, respectively); more hospitalisations were PAH-related for the high risk (71%) versus other risk groups (47-54%). Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were 98%, 98%, 93% and 80% at 1-year and 98%, 92%, 81% and 67% at 2-years, from low to high risk, respectively. In clinical settings, selexipag is initiated across all risk groups, predominantly as triple therapy. Only 45% of patients being at low/intermediate-low risk at selexipag initiation suggests an opportunity for more frequent patient monitoring and earlier treatment escalation, given that 4-strata risk assessment was prognostic for hospitalisations and survival in this contemporary PAH cohort. A graphical abstract is available with this article.

Efficacy and Safety of Pioglitazone Add-on in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Inadequately Controlled with Metformin and Dapagliflozin: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, and Placebo-controlled Study

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety profile of pioglitazone compared with placebo (PBO) in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) inadequately controlled with metformin and dapagliflozin. MethodsIn this prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, PBO-controlled trial, 366 patients with T2D who did not meet glycemic targets (7.0% ≤ glycosylated hemoglobin [HbA1c] ≤ 10.5%), despite treatment with metformin ≥1000 mg and dapagliflozin 10 mg, received either a PBO, 15 mg of pioglitazone daily (PIO15), or 30 mg of pioglitazone daily (PIO30). The primary end point was the mean change in HbA1c from baseline at 24 weeks across the groups. FindingsFor the 366 participants (PBO, n = 124; PIO15, n = 118; PIO30, n = 124), the mean age was 55.6 years and mean duration of diabetes was 8.7 years, with a baseline HbA1c of 7.9%. After 24 weeks, HbA1c reduced significantly in the PIO15 and PIO30 groups from baseline, with intergroup differences of −0.38% and −0.83%, respectively, compared with the PBO group. The proportion of patients with HbA1c levels <7% was significantly higher in the PIO15 and PIO30 groups than in the PBO group. The adverse event rates did not significantly differ across the groups, indicating favorable safety profiles for triple combination therapy using metformin, dapagliflozin, and pioglitazone. ImplicationsThe addition of pioglitazone as a third oral antidiabetic medication is an appropriate option for patients with T2D inadequately controlled with metformin and dapagliflozin based on the resulting significant efficacy in glycemic control and favorable safety profile. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04885712.

Triple combination therapy comprising osimertinib, an AXL inhibitor, and an FGFR inhibitor improves the efficacy of EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer

We previously reported that combined therapy with epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) osimertinib and AXL inhibitor ONO-7475 is effective in preventing the survival of drug-tolerant cells in high-AXL-expressing EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells. Nevertheless, certain residual cells are anticipated to eventually develop acquired resistance to this combination therapy. In this study, we attempted to establish a multidrug combination therapy from the first-line setting to overcome resistance to this combination therapy in high-AXL-expressing EGFR-mutated NSCLC. siRNA screening assay showed that fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) knockdown induced pronounced inhibition of cell viability in the presence of the osimertinib–ONO-7475 combination, which activates FGFR1 by upregulating FGF2 via the c-Myc pathway. Cell-based assays showed that triple therapy with osimertinib, ONO-7475, and the FGFR inhibitor BGJ398 significantly increased apoptosis by increasing expression of proapoptotic factor Bim and reduced cell viability compared with that observed for the osimertinib–ONO-7475 therapy. Xenograft models showed that triple therapy considerably suppressed tumor regrowth. A novel therapeutic strategy of additional initial FGFR1 inhibition may be highly effective in suppressing the emergence of osimertinib- and ONO-7475-resistant cells.

Clinical benefits of transarterial chemoembolization combined with tyrosine kinase and immune checkpoint inhibitors for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

Combination therapy has emerged as the focus of research for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In recent years, several studies have explored the clinical efficacy and safety of the combination therapies of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). To conduct an updated meta-analysis verifying the clinical benefits and adverse effects of the triple combination therapy for unresectable HCC. All eligible cohort, non-randomized controlled, and randomized controlled trial studies from the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, and MedLine databases up to March 20, 2024 were screened for the present meta-analysis. The study endpoints included complete response (CR), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events (AEs). Stata 16/18 software was used for this meta-analysis, and a P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. A total of 29 studies with 1754 patients were included. Among the patients who received the TACE therapy with TKIs and ICIs, the tumor response results revealed a pooled CR, ORR, and DCR of 14% [95%CI (0.11-0.18)], 61% [95%CI (0.55-0.66)], and 85% [95%CI (0.83-0.87)], respectively. In terms of the survival outcomes, the pooled median PFS and OS were 10.25 months [95%CI (9.31-11.18)] and 20.47 months [95%CI (18.98-21.97)], respectively. The pooled prevalence of all-grade AEs during the triple treatment was 90% [95%CI (0.84-0.94)] and that of grade ≥ 3 AEs was 32% [95%CI (0.24-0.42)]. The combination therapy of TACE, TKIs, and ICIs exhibits great clinical benefits for unresectable HCC in terms of tumor responses and survival outcomes without increasing the risk of severe AEs.

XTrends in racial and ethnic disparities in pediatric lung transplantation in the United States.

Racial and ethnic disparities in pediatric lung transplantation (LTx) related to the shifting cystic fibrosis (CF) population receiving highly effective modulator therapy (HEMT) has not been well investigated. The UNOS Registry was queried for patients age 1-25 years undergoing bilateral LTx between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2021. Race and ethnicity were classified as non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, or none of the above. The primary outcome was posttransplant mortality. Trends in the association between race/ethnicity and mortality were examined using transplant year as a continuous variable and stratifying year based on introduction of HEMT (triple combination therapy) in November 2019. In the study sample (N = 941), 7% of patients were non-Hispanic Black, 15% were Hispanic, and 2% were some other racial or ethnic group. One hundred (11%) received LTx after approval of triple combination therapy, and 407 (43%) died during follow-up. We identified a statistically significant disparity in mortality hazard (hazard ratio: 1.91; 95% confidence interval: 1.31, 2.80) in non-Hispanic Black compared to non-Hispanic White patients in the pre-triple combination therapy era. We found higher mortality hazard among non-Hispanic Black compared to non-Hispanic White children undergoing LTx in the United States. Further monitoring of LTx outcomes to identify and address disparities is needed in the current era of triple combination therapy for CF.

Dual add-on therapy of gemigliptin and dapagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin alone: The SOLUTION 2 study.

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of gemigliptin and dapagliflozin dual add-on therapy (GEMI + DAPA) to metformin in type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients who had inadequate glycaemic control on metformin alone, compared with a single add-on of either gemigliptin (GEMI) or dapagliflozin (DAPA) to metformin. In this randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, parallel-group, phase 3 study, 469 T2D patients treated with a stable dose of metformin for 8 weeks or longer were randomized to receive GEMI + DAPA (n = 157) and either GEMI (n = 156) or DAPA (n = 156). The primary endpoint was change in HbA1c levels from baseline at week 24. Baseline characteristics including body mass index and T2D duration were similar among groups. At week 24, the least square mean changes in HbA1c from baseline were -1.34% with GEMI + DAPA, -0.90% with GEMI (difference between GEMI + DAPA vs. GEMI -0.44% [95% confidence interval {CI}: -0.58% to -0.31%], P < .01) and -0.78% with DAPA (difference between GEMI + DAPA vs. DAPA -0.56% [95% CI: -0.69% to -0.42%], P < .01). Both upper CIs were less than 0, demonstrating the superiority of GEMI + DAPA for lowering HbA1c. The rates of responders achieving HbA1c less than 7% and less than 6.5% were greater with GEMI + DAPA (84.9%, 56.6%) than with GEMI (55.3%, 32.2%) and DAPA (49.3%, 15.3%). The incidence rate of adverse events was similar across groups, with low incidence rates of hypoglycaemia, urinary tract infection and genital infection. These results suggest that the addition of GEMI + DAPA to metformin as triple combination therapy was effective, safe and well-tolerated, especially for T2D patients who experienced poor glycaemic control on metformin alone.

Cost-effectiveness of single-pill and separate-pill administration of antihypertensive triple combination therapy: a population-based microsimulation study

BackgroundSingle-pill combination (SPC) of three antihypertensive drugs has been shown to improve adherence to therapy compared with free combinations, but little is known about its long-term costs and health consequences. This study aimed to evaluate the lifetime cost-effectiveness profile of a three-drug SPC of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, a calcium-channel blocker, and a diuretic vs the corresponding two-pill administration (a two-drug SPC plus a third drug separately) from the Italian payer perspective.MethodsA cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted using multi-state semi-Markov modeling and microsimulation. Using the healthcare utilization database of the Lombardy Region (Italy), 30,172 and 65,817 patients aged ≥ 40 years who initiated SPC and two-pill combination, respectively, between 2015 and 2018 were identified. The observation period extended from the date of the first drug dispensation until death, emigration, or December 31, 2019. Disease and cost models were parametrized using the study cohort, and a lifetime microsimulation was applied to project costs and life expectancy for the compared strategies, assigning each of them to each cohort member. Costs and life-years gained were discounted by 3%. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis with 1,000 samples was performed to address parameter uncertainty.ResultsCompared with the two-pill combination, the SPC increased life expectancy by 0.86 years (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.61–1.14), with a mean cost differential of -€12 (95% CI -9,719–8,131), making it the dominant strategy (ICER = -14, 95% CI -€15,871–€7,113). The cost reduction associated with the SPC was primarily driven by savings in hospitalization costs, amounting to €1,850 (95% CI 17–7,813) and €2,027 (95% CI 19–8,603) for patients treated with the SPC and two-pill combination, respectively. Conversely, drug costs were higher for the SPC (€3,848, 95% CI 574–10,640 vs. €3,710, 95% CI 263–11,955). The cost-effectiveness profile did not significantly change according to age, sex, and clinical status.ConclusionsThe SPC was projected to be cost-effective compared with the two-pill combination at almost all reasonable willingness-to-pay thresholds. As it is currently prescribed to only a few patients, the widespread use of this strategy could result in benefits for both patients and the healthcare system.

Recent developments in the management of resistant hypertension: focus on endothelin receptor antagonists.

Resistant hypertension is characterized by the inability of guideline-recommended triple combination therapy to control blood pressure(BP) to target. It is associated with a significantly increased risk of adverse outcomes. Despite abundant preclinical evidence supporting thecritical role of the endothelin pathway in resistant hypertension (RH), clinical implementation of endothelin antagonists for the treatment of hypertension was hindered by various factors. Recently, the novel dual endothelin-receptor antagonist aprocitentan was tested in individuals with resistant hypertension in the PRECISION trial and provided compelling evidence supporting both short and longer-term safety and clinically meaningful and sustained BP lowering efficacy.These findings resulted in therecent regulatory approval of aprocitentanby the FDA. Aprocitentan may be a particularly useful antihypertensive option for individuals with advanced age, chronic kidney disease, and albuminuria.

Combination Atezolizumab, Cobimetinib, and Vemurafenib as a Treatment Option in BRAF V600 Mutation-Positive Melanoma: Patient Selection and Perspectives.

The treatment landscape for advanced and metastatic melanoma has drastically changed in recent years, with the advent of novel therapeutic options such as immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies offering remarkable efficacy and significantly improved patient outcomes compared to traditional approaches. Approximately 50% of melanomas harbor activating BRAF mutations, with over 90% resulting in BRAF V600E. Tumors treated with BRAF inhibitor monotherapy have a high rate of developing resistance within six months. Combination therapy with MEK inhibitors helped to mitigate this treatment resistance and led to improved outcomes. Due to the up-regulation of PD-1/PD-L1 receptors in tumors treated with BRAF/MEK inhibitor therapy, further studies included a third combination agent, anti-PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. This triple combination therapy may have superior efficacy and a manageable safety profile when compared with single or double agent therapy regimens.

First-line hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy plus lenvatinib and PD-(L)1 inhibitors versus systemic chemotherapy alone or with PD-(L)1 inhibitors in unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

PurposeLimited treatment options exist for unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), with systemic chemotherapy (SC) serving as the primary approach. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of first-line hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) in combination with lenvatinib and PD-(L)1 inhibitors (HLP) compared to SC combined with PD-(L)1 inhibitors (SCP) or SC alone in treating unresectable ICC.MethodsPatient with unresectable ICC who underwent first-line treatment with HLP, SCP or SC from January 2016 to December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The study evaluated and compared efficacy and safety outcomes across the three treatment groups.ResultsThe study comprised 42, 49, and 50 patients in the HLP, SCP, and SC groups, respectively. Median progression-free survival (PFS) times were 30.0, 10.2, and 6.5 months for HLP, SCP, and SC groups. While the SC group had a median overall survival (OS) time of 21.8 months, the HLP and SCP groups hadn’t reached median OS. The HLP group demonstrated significantly superior PFS (p < 0.001) and OS (p = 0.014) compared to the others. Moreover, the HLP group exhibited the highest objective response rate (ORR) at 50.0% and the highest disease control rate (DCR) at 88.1%, surpassing the SC group (ORR, 6.0%; DCR, 52.0%) and SCP group (ORR, 18.4%; DCR, 73.5%) (p < 0.05). Generally, the HLP group reported fewer grades 3–4 adverse events (AEs) compared with others.ConclusionIn contrast to systemic chemotherapy with or without PD-(L)1 inhibitors, the triple combination therapy incorporating HAIC, lenvatinib, and PD-(L)1 inhibitors showcased favorable survival benefits and manageable adverse events for unresectable ICC.

Efficacy and tolerability of initial triple combination therapy with metformin, dapagliflozin and saxagliptin compared with stepwise add-on therapy in drug-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes (TRIPLE-AXEL study): A multicentre, randomized, 104-week, open-label, active-controlled trial.

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of an initial triple combination therapy (TCT) compared with conventional stepwise add-on therapy (SAT) in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes (T2D). This multicentre, randomized, 104-week, open-label trial randomized 105 patients with drug-naïve T2D (with HbA1c level ≥ 8.0%, < 11.0%) to the TCT (1000 mg of metformin, 10 mg of dapagliflozin and 5 mg of saxagliptin once daily) or SAT (initiated with metformin, followed by glimepiride and sitagliptin) groups. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who achieved an HbA1c level of less than 6.5% without hypoglycaemia, weight gain of 5% or higher, or discontinuation of drugs because of adverse events at week 104. HbA1c reduction from baseline at week 104 was similar between the groups (the least squares mean change was -2.56% in the TCT group vs. -2.75% in the SAT group). The primary outcome was achieved in 39.0% and 17.1% of the TCT and SAT groups, respectively, with a risk difference of 22.0 (95% confidence interval 3.0, 40.8; P = .027). HbA1c level less than 6.5% at week 104 was 46.3% in both the TCT and SAT groups, whereas the incidence of hypoglycaemia, weight gain, or discontinuation of drugs was 16.7% and 62.0% in the TCT and SAT groups, respectively (P < .001). TCT was well-tolerated and had fewer adverse events than SAT. Among newly diagnosed patients with T2D, initial TCT effectively lowered HbA1c levels with higher tolerability and safety than SAT for 104 weeks, suggesting a novel strategy for initial combination therapy in T2D patients.

Clinical Effectiveness of the Fixed‐Dose vs Free‐Dose Triple Combinations in Patients with Uncontrolled Arterial Hypertension

Background: The purpose of our study was a comparative assessment of the antihypertensive effectiveness of 2 triple combination antihypertensive therapy (AHT) regimens in a free-dose and fixed-dose combination of perindopril, indapamide, and amlodipine in hypertensive patients with high cardiovascular risk and a poor response to the 2-drug combinations in the clinic practice. Methods and Results: Our study included 143 patients (79 men and 88 women) with arterial hypertension (AH) Grades 1-3 (ESC/ESH, 2018) and high cardiovascular risk who did not achieve the target blood pressure (TBP) on dual combination AHT. The mean age of patients was 55.76±9.35 years; the average duration of AH was 10.69±6.61 years. All patients underwent the examinations according to the 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. Patients included in the study were divided into 2 groups using the envelope method: Group 1 (n=84) received a fixed-dose, triple combination of perindopril, indapamide, and amlodipine; Group 2 (n=83) received a free-dose combination of these drugs. In both groups, treatment began after discontinuation of previous therapy, with a low dose of a triple combination of antihypertensive drugs (perindopril [5 mg/day], indapamide [1.25 mg/day], amlodipine [5 mg/day]) in the form of a fixed or free combination. The initial doses of perindopril/indapamide/amlodipine in both groups were not statistically different: 6.9±2.4/1.74±0.6/7.1±2.4mg/day in Group 1 and 6.9±2.7/1.95±0.6/7.1±2.5 mg/day in Group 2. After 4 weeks of therapy, if necessary, the doses of drugs were increased, starting with perindopril; the next adjustment of drug doses was carried out after 12 weeks of therapy. The final treatment results were determined after 24 weeks of AHT. Target blood pressure (TBP) of &lt;140/90 mmHg was reached by 94.4% of patients in Group 1 and 83.3% in Group 2 (χ²=7.471, Р=0,006); TBP of &lt;130/80 mmHg was reached by 70% of patients in Group 1 and 42% in Group 2 (χ²=11.61, Р=0,0001). A significant improvement in the diurnal BP profile was also revealed during treatment. According to ABPM data, both groups achieved TBP in terms of the average 24-h and average daytime systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP). Regarding average nighttime SBP and DBP and normalization of average nighttime diastolic blood pressure variability, target values were achieved only in Group 1(P=0.028). In both groups, 24-week triple-combination therapy led to a significant decrease in central SBP, central DBP, and pulse wave velocity (PWV). At the same time, the positive dynamics of central SBP were more pronounced in Group 1 than in Group 2 (Table 4), and PWV in Group 1 reached standard values. Conclusion: The results of our study showed that in the treatment of uncontrolled hypertension on previous therapy in AH patients with high cardiovascular risk, a single-pill triple combination of the ACEI perindopril, the CCB amlodipine, and the thiazide-like diuretic indapamide contributed to the effective daily blood pressure control, the improvement of diurnal blood pressure profile, and a positive effect on central blood pressure and PWV, thereby having a positive impact on the prognosis and quality of life of AH patients with high cardiovascular risk.

Enhanced abscopal anti-tumor response via a triple combination of thermal ablation, IL-21, and PD-1 inhibition therapy

Despite the success of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in treating solid tumors, lots of patients remain unresponsive to this therapy. Microwave ablation (MWA) stimulates systemic adaptive immunity against tumor cells by releasing tumor antigens. Additionally, IL-21 has demonstrated importance in stimulating T-cell effector function. The combination of these three therapies—MWA, IL-21, and anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs)—has yet to be explored in the context of cancer treatment.In this study, we explored the impact of thermal ablation on IL-21R expression in tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). Subsequently, we assessed alterations in the tumor microenvironment (TME) and peripheral lymphoid organs. Additionally, we conducted a thorough examination of tumor-infiltrating CD45+ immune cells across various treatment groups using single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq). Moreover, we determined the potential anti-tumor effects of the triple combination involving MWA, IL-21, and anti-PD-1 mAbs.Our findings revealed that MWA upregulated the expression of IL-21R on various immune cells in the untreated tumors. The combination of MWA with IL-21 exhibited a robust abscopal anti-tumor effect, enhancing the effector function of CD8+ T cells and facilitating dendritic cells' maturation and antigen presentation in the untreated tumor. Notably, the observed abscopal anti-tumor effect resulting from the combination is contingent upon T-cell recirculation, indicating the reliance of systemic adaptive immunity for this treatment regimen. Additionally, the combination of MWA, IL-21, and PD-1 mAbs demonstrated profound abscopal anti-tumor efficacy. Our findings provide support for further clinical investigation into a triple combination therapy involving MWA, IL-21, and ICIs for the treatment of metastatic cancer.

Preliminary safety data of the PRODIGE 81-FFCD 2101-TRIPLET-HCC trial assessing the triple combination atezolizumab-bevacizumab-ipilimumab in patients (pts) treated in systemic therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

e16195 Background: TRIPLET-HCC is a French, multicentre, randomized 1:1, open-label phase II-III trial designed to evaluate efficacy and safety of the triple combination (Arm-A) by the addition of ipilimumab (1 mg/kg for the first 4 cycles) to atezolizumab/bevacizumab (Q3W), versus the double atezolizumab/bevacizumab combination (Arm-B) for HCC eligible to systemic therapy in first line setting. The primary objective of phase II is the objective response rate in Arm-A, and overall survival in Arm-A versus Arm-B in phase III. In phase II, the first 15 pts randomized in Arm-A were assessed for a safety-run in aim to detect a potential signal of overtoxicity after the first four cycles of triple therapy (induction phase), thus allowing or forbidding the continuation of the trial. Methods: The trial started on March 2023 the 9th. Adverse events (AE) and their imputability to treatment were reported in the eCRF by investigators. An independent data safety monitoring board (DSMB) was gathered 4 weeks after the last injection of ipilimumab of the 5th and the 15th patient randomized in Arm-A of phase II. The second DSMB meeting took place on November 2023 after extraction of data in November 2023 the 9th. These data are presented in the present abstract. Results: At the DSMB meeting date, 15 patients in Arm-A were analyzed for safety while 13 patients had been randomized in Arm-B and had reached at least 4 cycles of treatment. In Arm-A, 12 pts completed the first 4 cycles of triple therapy, 1 pt received 3 cycles (sepsis), 1 pt only 2 (prednisone &gt; 10 mg/day for grade-1 myocarditis which recovered), and 1 pt only 1 (sepsis and death). In Arm-B, 11 pts received the first 4 cycles of double therapy, 2 pts only 3 (anemia, lithiasic cholangitis). Three deaths occurred: 2 in Arm-A (1 possible related to immune-related (iR) hepatitis (not biopsy-proven) associated with sepsis, and 1 sudden death of unknow etiology), and one in Arm-B (tumor progression). Three pts in Arm-A (2 radiologic progressions, 1 death) and 1 pt in Arm-B (1 tumor progression with death) were withdrawn of the trial. Regarding grade-3/4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAE), 3 were reported in Arm-A (1 ASAT increase, 1 arterial hypertension, 1 colitis), and 2 in Arm-B (1 tumor bleeding, 1 arterial hypertension). Conclusions: The preliminary safety data from the TRIPLET-HCC trial suggest that the triple combination therapy is associated with a manageable safety profile, showing no unexpected signs of over toxicity. The DSMB's decision to continue the trial underscores the potential of this innovative therapeutic approach in improving outcomes for HCC patients. These findings support further investigation into the efficacy and long-term safety of the triple combination therapy in a broader patient population. Clinical trial information: NCT05665348 .

Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors plus bevacizumab or lenvatinib in hepatocellular carcinoma: Results from a retrospective dual-center cohort study.

e16159 Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) ranks as the sixth most prevalent cancer worldwide. Notably, over 80% of HCC cases are diagnosed at an intermediate to advanced stage. Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is globally acknowledged as the standard local treatment for intermediate HCC and remains the predominant care for advanced HCC, While lenvatinib (LEN) or the combination of bevacizumab (BEV) and atezolizumab is recognized as a first-line systemic therapy for HCC. Moreover, TACE+LEN+immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the treatment of HCC significantly enhances OS and PFS compared to the TACE+LEN. However, comparative studies between TACE+ICI+BEV and TACE+ICI+LEN are still forthcoming. Methods: This retrospective study encompasses data from 64 patients diagnosed with intermediate to advanced unresectable HCC at two medical centers in China between January 2021 and June 2023. The study's primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), while secondary outcomes included tumor response and conversion rates. Additionally, the study assessed the safety by adverse events (AE) across the two groups. Results: Of the 64 enrolled patients, 31 were treated with TACE+ICI+BEV and 33 with TACE+ICI+LEN. There was no significant difference in PFS between the two groups (5.7 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 5.2 to 7.9] versus 4.9 months [95% CI 4.5 to 7.7], P=0.404). The median OS for the TACE+ICI+LEN group was 21.3 months (95% CI 15.1 to 27.5), whereas the median OS in TACE+ICI+BEV group was not reached. A markedly higher proportion of patients in the TACE+ICI+BEV group achieved surgical conversion (22.6% versus 3.0%, P=0.047). Patients presenting with an alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level ≤40 u/L (hazard ratio [HR]=5.61, 95% CI 1.09-28.80, P=0.039) and without hepatic vein invasion (HR=31.6, 95% CI 1.03-9.68, P=0.044) appeared to derive greater benefit from the TACE+ICI+BEV regimen. Furthermore, patients with a Child-Pugh score of class A exhibited enhanced response to the triple-combination therapy (HR=6.17, 95% CI 1.86-20.53, P=0.003). Both therapeutic strategies were characterized by favorable safety profiles. Conclusions: TACE+ICI+BEV has demonstrated notable potential in increasing surgical conversion rate in the management of intermediate to advanced HCC, suggesting enhanced outcomes particularly in patients with superior liver function. [Table: see text]

Triple-combination therapy did not improve prognosis in anti-MDA5 positive dermatomyositis: a multicentre longitudinal cohort study.

Anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5-positive dermatomyositis (MDA5+ DM) is frequently linked with interstitial lung disease (ILD), especially the rapidly progressive ILD (RP-ILD). We conduct this research to evaluate the efficacy and safety of triple-combination (triple-combo) therapy consisting of high-dose corticosteroids, tacrolimus and intravenous cyclophosphamide in treating MDA5+ DM patients with ILD. A multicentre longitudinal cohort study involving 115 MDA5+ DM patients from the Nanjing Medical University Myositis Associated ILD (NMMI) cohort was conducted between January 2019 and November 2022. Patients were categorised into triple-combo and non-triple therapy groups, and their outcomes were assessed. Contrary to expectations, triple-combo therapy did not improve the prognosis for MDA5+ DM patients but was linked to increased mortality rates, especially among those at high risk for RP-ILD. Our study suggests that triple-combo therapy might not be effective in improving prognosis in MDA5+ DM patients. Further research is needed to establish safer and more effective treatment modalities for this patient population.

Abstract PO5-06-02: Phase II Trial of Combination of Atezolizumab, Cobimetinib and Eribulin (ACE) or Atezolizumab and Eribulin (AE) in patients with metastatic inflammatory breast cancer (IBC): Clinical data of both cohorts

Abstract Background: Metastatic IBC is an unmet clinical need due to the aggressiveness of this breast cancer subtype. Gene expression analysis of IBC samples post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy has revealed that dysregulation of immune pathways is common in tumors that do not have a complete pathologic response (pCR) to chemotherapy. The immune checkpoint PD-L1 is expressed in a third of IBC cases, and the MEK inhibitor, cobimetinib, has been shown to enhance the expression of PD-L1, the target of atezolizumab. Taken together, dual targeted therapy with atezolizumab and cobimetinib is hypothesized to be synergistic. Eribulin is a standard of care chemotherapy used in patients who have progressed on anthracycline-taxane based regimens. Materials and Methods: Patients received triple or double combination therapy depending on the timing of their enrollment. Patients with metastatic IBC who had measurable disease after at least 1 standard regimen were eligible. Any receptor subtype was allowed, and PD-L1 positivity was not required. The study began with a single cohort (n=17 patients) receiving all 3 agents with a lead-in phase to determine the MTD of cobimetinib in this setting. The study was later amended to include only atezolizumab and eribulin (cohort 2). Ten patients were treated in cohort 2. The study closed early due to lack of efficacy in cohort 2 and the changing landscape of metastatic breast cancer therapies. In cohort 1, atezolizumab was given every 2 weeks (840 mg), cobimetinib was given at 60/40/20 mg once daily, and eribulin was given at 1.4mg/m2 on day 1 and day 8 of 21-day cycles. In cohort 2, atezolizumab was given every 3 weeks (1200 mg) during the PD window and cycles 1-4, and then every 4 weeks (1680 mg) during maintenance, and eribulin was given at 1.4mg/m2 on day 1 and day 8 of 21-day cycles. Results: The MTD of cobimetinib was 40mg. In cohort 1, 17 patients were treated, 14 had at least 1 restaging evaluation. Seven patients had a partial response (50%) and 3 stable disease. The cohort was predominantly triple receptor-negative (n=13/17), with a median age of 51 yrs. The median PFS for patients in cohort 1 was 6.2 months (0-54.1). There were 2 exceptional responders, both with triple negative subtype, one of whom remains on therapy for &amp;gt;4.5 years without evidence of disease. The median overall survival was 29.6 months (2.9-133). The AE profile was largely expected, with 3 irAEs (1 grade 5 colitis, and 2 grade 2 pneumonitis), and one other patient with cardiac dysfunction requiring discontinuation of cobimetinib and atezolizumab. The MTD of cobimetinib was 40 mg. Cobimetinib-related toxicities were mild and largely gastrointestinal tract related. In cohort 2, only 1 patient experienced PR, and the median PFS was 3 months (1.2-6.2) and overall survival 8.3 months (1.8-19.9). One patient experienced autoimmune related hepatitis requiring discontinuation of protocol therapy. Due to excesive myelosuppression, dose of erublin was reduced to 1.1 mg per meter squared on day 1 and 8 and pegfilgastrim was added on day 9&amp;lt; Conclusions: The response profile of the triple combination demonstrated promise, and suggests that MEK inhibition may warrant further investigation as a strategy in metastatic IBC in a larger sample size. However, there does not appear to be synergy between atezolizumab and eribulin without the addition of targeted therapy. Citation Format: Angela Alexander, Hope Murphy, James Reuben, H. T. Carisa Le-Petross, Deanna Lane, Monica Huang, Savitri Krishnamurthy, Yun Gong, Dan Gombos, Nimisha Patel, Richard Allen, Suyu Liu, Anisha Patel, Andrew Futreal, Ignacio Wistuba, Rachel Layman, Naoto Ueno, Debu Tripathy, Bora Lim, Vicente Valero. Phase II Trial of Combination of Atezolizumab, Cobimetinib and Eribulin (ACE) or Atezolizumab and Eribulin (AE) in patients with metastatic inflammatory breast cancer (IBC): Clinical data of both cohorts [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO5-06-02.

Heterogeneity in response to Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor in people with cystic fibrosis

BackgroundHighly effective modulators of the CFTR channel have been demonstrated to dramatically impact disease progression and outcome. However, real-world data indicates that the magnitude of the clinical benefit is not equal among all patients receiving the treatment. We aimed to assess the variability in treatment response (as defined by the 6-month change in sweat chloride concentration, forced expiratory volume in one second [ppFEV1], body mass index [BMI], and CF Questionnaire-Revised [CFQ-R] respiratory domain score) and identify potential predictors in a group of patients receiving Elexacaftor-Tezacaftor-Ivacaftor (ETI) triple combination therapy. MethodsThis was a single-center, prospective cohort study enrolling adults with CF at a major center in Italy. We used linear regression models to identify a set of potential predictors (including CFTR genotype, sex, age, and baseline clinical characteristics) and estimate the variability in treatment response. ResultsThe study included 211 patients (median age: 29 years, range: 12–58). Median changes (10–90th percentile) from baseline were: - 56 mEq/L (–76; –27) for sweat chloride concentration, +14.5 points (2.5; 32.0) for ppFEV1, +0.33 standard deviation scores (–0.13; 1.05) for BMI and +17 points (0; 39) for the CFQ-R respiratory domain score. The selected predictors explained 23 % of the variability in sweat chloride concentration changes, 18 % of the variability in ppFEV1 changes, 39 % of the variability in BMI changes, and 65 % of the variability in CFQ-R changes. ConclusionsThis study highlights a high level of heterogeneity in treatment response to ETI, which can only be partially explained by the baseline characteristics of the disease.

SINGLE-PILL COMBINATION OF THIRD-DOSE TRIPLE ANTIHYPERTENSIVE THERAPY VERSUS STANDARD-DOSE MONOTHERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH MILD TO MODERATE HYPERTENSION

Objective: The study compared the single-pill combination of third-dose triple antihypertensive therapy (amlodipine 1.67 mg, losartan potassium 16.67 mg, chlorthalidone 4.17 mg) with standard-dose monotherapy (amlodipine 5mg) in reducing systolic blood pressure (SBP) among patients with mild to moderate hypertension. Design and method: This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, parallel-group phase III noninferiority trial. Eligible participants aged &gt;=19 years with SBP &gt;=140 to &lt;180 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) &lt;110 mmHg after 4 weeks placebo run-in period were randomized to either 8 weeks of combination therapy (ALC) or monotherapy (A5). The primary efficacy endpoint, noninferiority in SBP reduction, was assessed using the upper limit of the one-sided 97.5% confidence interval (97.5%CI) for the difference in SBP reduction between treatments at week 8, with a noninferiority margin of 3 mmHg. Results: The efficacy endpoint analysis included 167 and 166 in the ALC and A5 groups. After 8 weeks, the ALC and A5 groups showed SBP reductions of -18.3±11.9 and -19.4±12.5, respectively, and DBP reductions of -8.5±7.3 and -9.8±7.0 mmHg, respectively (p&gt;0.025 for both). The unadjusted least-square mean (LSM) difference in SBP reduction was 1.15 mmHg, with a 97.5%CI upper limit of 3.51 mmHg. More female patients were allocated to the A5 than the ALC groups (47.6% vs. 34.1%, p=0.012). Both treatments exhibited greater SBP reduction in women than men (-21.4 vs. -16.8 mmHg, p=0.009 in the ALC group; -21.9 vs -17.1 mmHg, p&lt;0.001 in the A5 group). The sex-adjusted LSM difference in SBP reduction was 0.46 mmHg, with a 97.5%CI upper limit of 2.79 mmHg. The response rates (achieving SBP &lt;140 mmHg and DBP &lt;90 mmHg and/or reduction of SBP &gt;=20 mmHg and/or DBP &gt;=10 mmHg from baseline) were 73.1% for ALC and 75.3% for A5 groups (p=0.633). Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) occurred in 3 patients receiving ALC and 5 patients receiving A5, all being mild. Conclusions: The study demonstrated that the single-pill third-dose triple antihypertensive therapy is comparable to standard-dose monotherapy in reducing SBP over 8 weeks without increasing ADRs, providing further support for the low-dose combination antihypertensive drugs in the initial treatment of hypertension. (NCT05362110)