Deep space exploration utilizing high-orbit vehicles is a vital approach for extending beyond near-Earth space, with orbit information serving as the foundation for all functional capabilities. The performance of orbit determination is primarily influenced by observation types, errors, geometrical structures, and physical perturbations. Currently, research on orbit determination for high-orbit spacecraft predominantly focuses on single observation methods, error characteristics, multi-source fusion techniques, and algorithms. However, these approaches often suffer from low observation accuracy and increased costs. This paper advocates for the comprehensive utilization of existing multi-source observation methods, such as GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite System), SLR (Satellite Laser Ranging), and VLBI (Very Long Baseline Interferometry), in research. The decoupled Kalman filter reveals a positive correlation between measurement positioning accuracy and orbit determination accuracy, and it derives a simple orbit performance evaluation model that considers the influence of observation value types and geometric configurations, without the need to introduce complex dynamic models. Simulations are then employed to verify and analyze antenna gain, observation values, and performance evaluation. The results indicate the following: (1) Under simulated conditions, the optimal strategy involves employing the SLR/VLBI dual system during periods when VLBI orbit determination is feasible, yielding an average Weighted Position Dilution of Precision (WPDOP) of 26.79. (2) For periods when VLBI orbit determination is not feasible, the optimal approach is to utilize the GNSS/SLR/VLBI triple system, resulting in an average WPDOP of 16.32. (3) The orbit determination performance of the triple system is not significantly impacted by the use of global SLR stations compared to using only Chinese SLR stations. However, the global network enables continuous, round-the-clock orbit determination capabilities.
Read full abstract