The literature on excess commuting has grown significantly over the past three decades. However, there are still some important open questions about the resulting statistics. Despite researchers proposing several commuting benchmarks and excess metrics, there is poor comparability between empirical studies. Many studies use average trip length to evaluate commuting efficiency of the whole region, while very few studies visualize the spatial organization of (excess) commuting patterns and evaluate its commuting orderliness. Based on a finely disaggregated data base --- the National 1% Population Sampling Survey in Shanghai, this study investigates commuting patterns and their relationship to urban land use arrangement by detailed industrial sectors from the perspectives of both average trip length and spatial organization measured by entropy value. It offers insights into social inequalities, spatial mismatch and commuting performance by identifying which groups of workers make more contribution to urban traffic congestion and have more inefficient and disorderly commutes. The results suggest that there are significant commuting differences between the groups, both socially and spatially. Overlooking the heterogeneity of commuter behaviors and socioeconomic characteristics may overestimate or underestimate excess commuting. Skilled workers commute further and experience more excess commuting than less-skilled workers, which is very different from American cities and brings forth new insights into traditional spatial mismatch. This paper also finds that workers in the manufacturing sector commute longer than those in the wholesale and retail sector but the commuting pattern of the former is more organized and orderly than the latter, indicating that long-distance commuting patterns might not necessarily be inefficient and disorderly and vice versa.