Difference in nuchal translucency and T21 risk calculation between mid-sagittal section and mid-sagittal section also showing maxilla and nasal bone. We evaluate fetus (n = 1242) with CRL was 65 to 84 mms. 2D sections were obtained of NT in mid-sagittal plane as per FMF criteria (maxilla not to be seen) and about 5-degree oblique plane where maxilla along with nasal bone are visible in midsagittal plane were documented. NT was measured by auto NT calculation in GE Voluson E10. Risk for Down syndrome was calculated in Astraia gmbh FMF approved software. We were able to get NT section in 98% and 96% in section showing NB, Maxilla and NT. There was a fixed error of NT of 0.2 mm between both sections. Mid sagittal section as per FMF was lower. Risk for T21 was not showing significant difference. When mother was less than 35 years, calculated risk difference was < 4%. When mother was above 35 years' risk varied up to 6%. As per new algorithm by FMF, NIPT is recommended when risk is intermediate between 1:10 to 1:3000. More than 97% of patients did not shifted from low, intermediate or high-risk group without change in clinical manage. Ease of following fewer rigid criteria will increase the NT users and will be beneficial to society, where less professionals are available who can perform first trimester screening. If NT as per FMF criteria is difficult to be obtained, one can consider NT at a mid-sagittal section where NT and NB are seen with maxilla. It will not make a significant difference in risk calculation for Trisomy 21. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.