The use of lanthanide complexes as powerful auxiliaries for biocrystallography prompted us to systematically analyze the influence of the commercial crystallization kit composition on the efficiency of two lanthanide additives: [Eu(DPA)3]3- and Tb-Xo4. This study reveals that the tris(dipicolinate) complex presents a lower chemical stability and a strong tendency toward false positives, which are detrimental for its use in a high-throughput robotized crystallization platform. In particular, the crystal structures of (Mg(H2O)6)3[Eu(DPA)3]2·7H2O (1), {(Ca(H2O)4)3[Eu(DPA)3]2}n·10nH2O (2), and {Cu(DPA)(H2O)2}n (3), resulting from spontaneous crystallization in the presence of a divalent alkaline-earth cation and transmetalation, are reported. On the other hand, Tb-Xo4 is perfectly soluble in the crystallization media, stable in the presence of alkaline-earth dications, and slowly decomposes (within days) by transmetalation with transition metals. The original structure of [Tb4L4(H2O)4]Cl4·15H2O (4) is also described, where L represents a bis(pinacolato)triazacyclononane ligand. This paper also highlights a potential synergy of interactions between Tb-Xo4 and components of the crystallization mixtures, leading to the formation of complex adducts like {AdkA/Tb-Xo4/Mg2+/glycerol} in the protein binding sites. The observation of such multicomponent adducts illustrated the complexity and versatility of the supramolecular chemistry occurring at the surface of the proteins.