The following regionally distributed contact-metamorphosed metalliferous sediments occur in association with each other in the lower part (Upper Olenekian‐Ladinian) of the Triassic siliceous formation of the Sikhote-Alin, which is enriched in carbon: manganese‐silicate (metamorphosed siliceous‐rhodochrosite) rocks, “brown cherts” (cherts with pyrophanite and spessartine), tin‐iron ores, “ilmenite‐biotite‐feld spar” (metamorphosed argillous) rocks, and “itabirites” (gold-bearing jaspers). These rocks occur in association with the products of hydrothermal regeneration composing bodies of different morphology and composition, including deposits of manganiferous skarnlike (amphibole‐pyroxene) rocks and skarns [1‐3]. Metalliferous sediments and products of their regeneration contain nickel and cobalt sulfides, arsenides, antimonides, tellurides, sulfoarsenids, sulfoantimonides and sulfotellurides, minerals of rare earth elements, thorium, uranium, barium, vanadium, and other minerals. Furthermore, reduced forms of different metals are common: native elements, solid solutions, intermetallic compounds, phosphides, and silicides. Associations of the reduced forms occur in pores and microsize fissures with organic matter. They were formed during the contact-metamorphic process under high temperatures (according to the admixture concentration level of several elements in native metals) accompanied by hydrocarbon decay and hydrogen reducing of oxidized forms. In view of the degree of the metalliferous rock distribution and the usual presence in it of minerals of Au, Ag, Pt, and Pd (a separate publication devoted to these minerals has been prepared [5]), the question of the concentration level of noble metals in these rocks becomes very important. Analyses performed earlier [1, 3] could not give an unambiguous answer to this question. Although they revealed high concentrations of Au, Pt, and Pd in separate samples, they characterized only manganese‐silicate rocks, their amount was insufficient, and reproducibility was weak. The concentrations of Au and Pt were found to be lower (one order of magnitude or more) than was expected according to the results of the investigation of mineral forms and dissolution of samples in hydrofluoric acid. The following three analytical methods have been used in the present work: fire assay with atomic absorption (AA) finishing, ICP-MS, and AA. The results of the fire assay analysis were found to contradict the data from the microprobe investigation and dissolution of samples in hydrofluoric acid. As was established during the microprobe investigation of the cinder, the losses were connected with