Trials In Triple-negative Breast Cancer Research Articles

Racial disparities among triple negative breast cancer clinical trial enrollees between 2010-2023.

1093 Background: Despite the social construct of race lacking biological significance, it plays a significant role in health disparities and necessitates examination to address social stratification and health inequities. Not reporting race in medical research neglects the reality of social stratification, injustices, and implications for population health. Additionally, excluding racial demographic data from research publications may conceal health disparities. This study focuses on Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) clinical trials, aiming to meta-analyze the inclusion of racial data and assess racial representation. Methods: A meta-analysis of 81 completed TNBC trials (2011-2023) from ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted. Demographic data on race and sex were extracted and analyzed using Microsoft Excel. Two independent reviewers extracted study-level data for a random-effects analysis. The primary outcome was identifying the prevalence of studies lacking racial data. The secondary outcomes are the prevalence of each racial category (White, Black, Asian, Hispanic/Latino, and Combined Other) among all TNBC clinical trials that reported demographic information. The Combined Other category includes American Indian, Native Hawaiian, more than one race, and unknown/unreported. Results: Of 81 trials, 29.63% did not report racial data. The remaining 57 trials (8,196 participants) revealed 73.98% White, 10.29% Asian, 7.85% Black, 8.02% Hispanic/Latino, and 4.12% "combined other" participants. U.S.-based trials (36 studies, 3,348 participants) showed 77.96% White, 12.03% Black, 4.51% Asian, and 4.96% Hispanic/Latino participants. Moreover, we conducted a comparative analysis between the racial distribution in U.S. clinical trials and the prevalence of TNBC in the U.S. population, utilizing the National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Public Use Datasets (2010-2019). The analysis revealed a significant discrepancy with White (p<.001) participants being overrepresented, and Black (p<.001), Asian (p<.001), Hispanic/Latino (p<.001), American Indian (p<.001), more than one race (p<.02), and Other/Unknown (p<.001) populations being underrepresented. Conclusions: Globally, 29.63% of TNBC trials did not report racial data, raising concerns about generalizability. U.S.-based studies exhibited overrepresentation of White participants and underrepresentation of Black, Asian, Hispanic/Latino, American Indian, Native Hawaiian, and other categories. Notably, Black and Hispanic/Latino individuals, comprising a substantial portion of TNBC patients, were underrepresented. These findings underscore racial/ethnic disparities in breast cancer trial participation, warranting further investigation into recruitment barriers for equitable participation.

Non-basal subtype defined by FOXC1 expression as an independent predictor of capecitabine efficacy in the triple negative breast cancer GEICAM/2003-11_CIBOMA/2004-01 trial.

516 Background: In a prespecified correlative analysis of the GEICAM/2003-11_CIBOMA/2004-01 phase III clinical trial (CIBOMA trial), PAM50 non-basal status identified triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients (pts) most likely to benefit from adjuvant capecitabine (cap). FOXC1 cell plasticity/metastasis transcriptional driver assessment by standardized Veresca FOXC1 Immunohistochemistry (IHC) BC test (Veresca) has shown rigorous capacity to identify basal-like breast cancer (BLBC) subtype throughout TNBC cohorts. We sought to explore the concordance of BLBC identification by FOXC1 with PAM50 molecular subtyping and its prognostic/predictive value in the CIBOMA trial (NCT00130533). Methods: We analyzed FOXC1 expression (Veresca, Onconostic Technologies) and the Ki-67 Antigen MIB-1 (Dako) by IHC on tumors from 705 TNBC pts randomized to maintenance with cap (357, 51%) vs observation (obs) (348, 49%) after standard (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy (CT). Veresca score (VFOXC1) was defined as % of tumor cells with positive nuclear staining (Proportion Score 0-5) plus staining intensity (Intensity Score 0-3). BLBC subtyping by Veresca (cutoff ≥4) and PAM50 signature (Nanostring) were compared using ROC analysis and Kappa index (KI). Ki67 ≥20% cutoff was applied. Cox regression models were assessed to predict DRFS (primary endpoint), DFS and OS (secondary endpoints). Results: VFOXC1≥4 identified 460 (65%) BLBC pts in this CIBOMA trial cohort (229 (49.8%) treated with cap, and 231 (50.2%) in obs). VFOXC1 detection was not associated with any clinicopathological characteristic. VFOXC1 expression significantly correlated with PAM50 BLBC subtyping (ROC analysis AUC 0.874, KI 0.43) but moderately with IHC subtyping (AUC 0.548). VFOXC1 BLBC subtype was not associated with DRFS (HR=0.94; 95%CI 0.68-1.30; p=0.713) in the entire cohort. However, VFOXC1 non-BLBC subtype was a strong independent predictor of cap benefit for DRFS (univariate analysis, interaction p-value p=0.117; HR=0.53; 95%CI 0.31-0.90; p=0.019; multivariate analysis, HR=0.44; 95%CI 0.25–0.76; p=0.003). This predictive effect of VFOXC1 non-BLBC on cap benefit was also confirmed at DFS (HR=0.47; 95%CI 0.28–0.78; p=0.003) and OS (HR=0.48; 95%CI 0.24–0.96; p=0.038), and was independent of Ki67 proliferation status (multivariate DRFS; Ki67<20%, HR=0.41; 95%CI 0.20-0.82; p=0.012; Ki67≥20%, HR=0.31; 95%CI 0.10-0.97; p=0.045). VFOXC1 non-BLBC subtype had no association with clinical outcome in obs arm. Conclusions: In the CIBOMA TNBC trial, the non-BLBC definition by a single biomarker (FOXC1 Veresca) provided prognostic and predictive value of cap benefit after (neo)adjuvant CT, corroborating our previous findings by PAM50 and IHC non-BLBC subtyping. This is a pragmatic option to effectively apply findings from this trial in the real-world setting. Clinical trial information: NCT00130533 .

Novel markers of MCL1 inhibitor sensitivity in triple-negative breast cancer cells

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive breast cancer sub-type with limited treatment options and poor prognosis. Currently, standard treatments for TNBC includes surgery, chemotherapy, and anti-PDL1 therapy. These therapies have limited efficacy in advanced stages. Myeloid-cell leukemia 1 (MCL1) is an anti-apoptotic BCL2 family protein. High expression of MCL1 contributes to chemotherapy resistance and is associated with worse prognosis in TNBC. MCL1 inhibitors are in clinical trials for TNBC, but response rates to these inhibitors can vary and predictive markers are lacking. Currently we identified a 4-member (AXL, ETS1, IL6, EFEMP1) gene signature (GS) that predicts MCL1 inhibitor sensitivity in TNBC cells. Factors encoded by these genes regulate signaling pathways to promote MCL1 inhibitor resistance. Small molecule inhibitors of the GS factors can overcome resistance and sensitize otherwise resistant TNBC cells to MCL1 inhibitor treatment. These findings offer insights into potential therapeutic strategies and tumor stratification for MCL1 inhibitor use in TNBC.

Abstract PS16-01: Comparison of an Atezolizumab monotherapy window followed by Atezolizumab and chemotherapy vs. Atezolizumab and chemotherapy alone in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) – final analysis of the neoadjuvant neoMono trial

Abstract Background: Improvement of systemic therapy of TNBC still is a medical need. Exploratory data from the neoadjuvant GeparNuevo trial suggested a benefit from an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy window in TNBC. The neoMono trial prospectively analyzed whether the addition of a preceding Atezolizumab monotherapy window prior to Atezolizumab and chemotherapy (CTX) improves pCR rates among patients (pts) with early TNBC. In an interim analysis after 100 pCR events, patients with unselected TNBC did not show a significant benefit from an Atezolizumab monotherapy window, while an exploratory analysis suggested a highly clinically relevant benefit among pts with PD-L1 positive TNBC. Here we present the final primary endpoint analysis. Methods: NeoMono is a phase 2 randomized multicenter trial that was planned to recruit a maximum of 458 female and male pts with primary TNBC (defined as ER/PR < 10% and HER2 negative) with tumor stages cT1c – cT4d (cN0 and cN+). As the protocol mandated termination of trial recruitment based on the results of the interim analysis, the final ITT population was limited to 359 pts. PD-L1 status had to be identifiable by central pathology by means of the VENTANA PD-L1 (SP142) assay and was defined by PD-L1 expression on immune cells (IC). Neoadjuvant treatment in both study arms consisted of Atezolizumab 1200 mg every 3 weeks in addition to neoadjuvant CTX (12 x Carboplatin/Paclitaxel q1w followed by 4x Epirubicin/Cyclophosphamide q3w). Combination therapy in arm A was preceded by an Atezolizumab monotherapy window of 840 mg once two weeks prior to initiation of combination therapy, while patients in arm B received no immune monotherapy window. Study goals are to compare the efficacy of neoadjuvant CTX + Atezolizumab with versus without a two-week atezolizumab monotherapy window preceding CTX + ICI (primary endpoint: pCR) and to identify biomarkers for response and resistance through analysis of sequential tissue and liquid biopsies. The neoMono statistical design uses Bayesian posterior probabilities (uniform prior distribution) and logistic regression to analyze the primary endpoint. Results: 180 pts in arm A and 179 in arm B from 34 study sites were included in the final primary endpoint analysis. Demographics and baseline characteristics as well as drug exposure were well-balanced in both arms. Posterior mean pCR rates in the ITT population in study arms A and B were 65.7% (95% high posterior density interval (HPDI): 58.5%, 72.5%) and 69% (62.2%, 75.9%), respectively. In an exploratory analysis stratified by PD-L1 IC status (negative: < 1% versus positive: ≥ 1%), pCR rates in arm A were 91.5% in the PD-L1 IC-positive group and 56.1% in the PD-L1 IC-negative group, the corresponding pCR rates in arm B were 82.2% and 64.5%, respectively. In a multivariate analysis of the ITT population including tumor size, nodal status, tumor grade, age and PD-L1 status, the odds ratio for achieving a pCR was 4.77 (p < 0.001) for PD-L1-positive and 2.36 (p=0.023) for grade 3 tumors. In an exploratory analysis including HER2 status, odds for achieving a pCR were significantly higher for patients with HER2-negative (IHC 0) vs. HER2-low tumors (OR 1.73, p=0.036). No new safety signals were observed. Conclusion: The final primary endpoint analysis of the neoMono trial demonstrated the highest pCR rates ever reported in a phase II/III trial in TNBC. While a significant impact of an ICI monotherapy window on the pCR rate after combination of CTX + ICI in an unselected ITT population could not be demonstrated, neoMono indicates for the first time in a randomized prospective setting that patients with immune active TNBC might derive particular benefit from a preceding ICI monotherapy window. The results of the neoMono trial are mainly justifying the conduction of a confirmative trial in immune active TNBC. However, our results underscore the potential role of pre-therapeutic ICI monotherapy window as part of future therapeutic concepts in TNBC. Citation Format: Hans-Christian Kolberg, Johannes Schumacher, Ramona Erber, Michael Braun, Peter A. Fasching, Eva-Maria Grischke, Christian Schem, Michael P. Lux, Mustafa Deryal, Oliver Hoffmann, Bernhard Heinrich, Georg Kunz, Kristina Lübbe, Petra Krabisch, Arndt Hartmann, Philip Raeth, Sabine Kasimir-Bauer, Cornelia Kolberg-Liedtke. Comparison of an Atezolizumab monotherapy window followed by Atezolizumab and chemotherapy vs. Atezolizumab and chemotherapy alone in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) – final analysis of the neoadjuvant neoMono trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PS16-01.

Abstract PO1-03-07: Revisiting the potential of pathological complete response as a surrogate for long-term survival outcomes in triple-negative breast cancer at the trial-level

Abstract Background: Pathological complete response (pCR) has been used as a primary endpoint in neoadjuvant clinical trials for non-metastatic breast cancer and as a surrogate endpoint for long-term survival outcomes. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) accepted pCR as a surrogate endpoint for the approval of new drugs in the neoadjuvant setting in high-risk early-stage breast cancer. However, though the Collaborative Trials in Neoadjuvant Breast Cancer (CTNeoBC) pooled analysis in 2014 showed that at the patient level achieving pCR was associated with longer overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS), at the trial-level the association between high pCR rate and better OS and EFS outcomes was weak (coefficient of difference [R2]; 0.03 and 0.24, respectively) among all subtypes of breast cancer. A recent study reported that this association at the trial-level was similarly weak among Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-2 (HER-2) positive breast cancer (R2; 0.02 and 0.23, respectively). However, the potential surrogacy of pCR rate for OS and EFS in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) in the neoadjuvant setting has not been well studied in a comprehensive manner. Moreover, because of significant advances in systemic treatment strategies in TNBC over the past decade including a combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with conventional cytotoxic agents, the trial-level surrogacy needs to be reassessed in recently published neoadjuvant clinical trials for TNBC. Our primary objective is to assess the association between pCR rate and survival outcomes in neoadjuvant clinical trials for TNBC by collecting data from articles published after the CTNeoBC article in 2014. Methods: We performed a systematic literature search based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines in the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases. Articles published between January 1, 2014, and March 31, 2023, were searched. We included only randomized control trials of neoadjuvant treatments for clinical stage I-III TNBC that compared two or more regimens followed by curative intent breast surgery. The selected trials had data for odds ratio (OR) for pCR and hazard ratios (HRs) either for OS or for EFS or disease-free survival (DFS). We excluded trials including estrogen receptor positive, progesterone receptor-positive, or HER-2 positive diseases, and those without data enough to obtain ORs for pCR, HRs for OS, EFS, or DFS. Unpublished data as a full article was also excluded. If EFS could not be obtained from the articles, DFS was used in place of EFS. Two independent investigators (TY and TF) searched and extracted data. Any disagreement was resolved by discussion with the third author (ZZ). A linear regression model on a logarithmic scale weighted by the sample size of each trial was performed and the R2 was used to assess the trial-level association between OR for pCR and HRs for OS or EFS. Results: We identified eight trials with a total of 2,926 patients. Three of the eight trials used ICIs in the intervention arm. One trial did not provide OS data and was not included in the OS analysis. In four trials, EFS was not available and DFS was used for EFS analysis. The R2 was 0.191 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.165 to 0.218) for OS and 0.193 (95% CI, 0.167 to 0.219) for EFS. Conclusions: Similarly to the previous reports, our findings suggest that the surrogacy of the pCR rate for OS and EFS in recent neoadjuvant clinical trials for TNBC is weak. At this moment, there is no strong evidence to support using pCR as a surrogate for long-term survival outcomes in neoadjuvant clinical trials for TNBC. Citation Format: Toru Yoshino, Zao Zhang, Ryota Sato, Stanley Lipkowitz, Takeo Fujii. Revisiting the potential of pathological complete response as a surrogate for long-term survival outcomes in triple-negative breast cancer at the trial-level [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-03-07.

Abstract PO2-20-11: Safety and efficacy of KEYNOTE-522 in combination with anti-retroviral therapy in a patient with HIV and triple-negative breast cancer

Abstract Introduction: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a subtype of breast cancer (BC) that does not express estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2), accounting for about 15% of all BC. TNBC is more aggressive than other BC with a higher risk of recurrence and mortality. The current standard of care for high-risk, early-stage TNBC based on the KEYNOTE-522 trial is neoadjuvant multidrug chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin [TCb] weekly x 12 weeks and doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide [AC] Q3 weeks) with pembrolizumab (P). The trial demonstrated patients who received chemotherapy plus P had a higher pathological complete response and event-free survival compared to patients who received chemotherapy plus placebo. However, the trial excluded patients with any autoimmune disease requiring treatment within 2 years, a diagnosis of immunodeficiency or steroids within 7 days before the first treatment, or a known history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). While limited data exist on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in patients with immunodeficiencies, subsequent data demonstrate that patients with HIV have similar efficacy and immune-related adverse events (irAE) compared to patients without HIV, and 2017 consensus recommendations encouraged broader eligibility in clinical trials to include patients with HIV. We present one of the first reported clinical cases of a patient with HIV diagnosed with stage IIB TNBC, treated per KEYNOTE-522 and anti-retroviral therapy (ART). Clinical Case: A 55-year-old female with a medical history significant for HIV, self-detected a mass in her left breast. Diagnostic imaging demonstrated a suspicious 4.0 cm mass in the left breast without adenopathy. An ultrasound-guided biopsy of the mass revealed grade 3 invasive ductal carcinoma with ER 0%, PR < 1%, and HER-2 1+. The clinical stage was cT2N0M0, prognostic stage IIB. Genetic testing was positive for germline BRCA2 pathogenic variant. HIV PCR < 20 copies/mL and CD4 count 1.298 K/uL prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The patient was adherent to HIV ART with bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide. The patient received KEYNOTE-522, including 11 cycles of TCb-P, followed by four cycles of AC-P. Following neoadjuvant treatment, the patient underwent a left segmental mastectomy and sentinel lymph node biopsy and achieved a pathological complete response. She completed left whole breast radiation (RT) with 3DCRT plus 3DCRT tumor bed boost to a total dose of 48.06 cGy and one-year of adjuvant P. Treatment-related adverse events included grade 4 febrile neutropenia after cycle one AC without growth factor, requiring a 5-day hospitalization; and grade 3 peripheral neuropathy, resulting in discontinuation of week 12 of TCb. The patient also developed paronychia, and a pulmonary embolism after week 11 of TCb. She had no irAE. Radiation-related adverse events included grade 1 left breast dermatitis and fatigue and mild left breast soreness. Discussion: Among the subset of patients diagnosed with TNBC, the percentage of patients with HIV or immunodeficiency receiving active BC treatment is low. Safety and efficacy data for novel cancer therapeutics including ICI are limited since historically patients with HIV and other immunodeficiency states were excluded from trials. Anti-PD-1 ICI has become a key part of the standard of care for the treatment of breast cancer. Patients with HIV experience rare infectious complications and have a life expectancy near the general population with ART. We support the inclusion of patients with HIV in future clinical trials for TNBC and/or ICI and recommend treatment of patients with HIV and TNBC per standard of care in multi-disciplinary collaboration with HIV clinicians. Citation Format: Stephanie Haddad, Stephanie Graff, Matthew Hadfield, Yihong Wang, Charu Taneja, Kara Leonard, Martha Sanchez, Robert Ward, Ana Lourenco, Mary Anne Fenton. Safety and efficacy of KEYNOTE-522 in combination with anti-retroviral therapy in a patient with HIV and triple-negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO2-20-11.

Estrogen-Receptor-Low-Positive Breast Cancer: Pathological and Clinical Perspectives.

The expression of estrogen receptors (ERs) in breast cancer (BC) represents a strong prognostic and predictive biomarker and directs therapeutic decisions in early and advanced stages. ER-low-positive BC, defined by the immunohistochemical (IHC) expression of ERs from 1% to 9%, constitutes a distinct subset of total BC cases. Guidelines recommend that a low expression of ERs be reported in pathology reports since the benefit of endocrine therapy in patients with ER-low-positive BC is uncertain. Recently, several cohorts, mostly of a retrospective nature, have been published, reporting the clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes of ER-low-positive BC. However, the majority of the data focus on early-stage BC and the use of (neo)adjuvant therapy, and there is a significant lack of data regarding metastatic ER-low-positive BC. Further factors, including tumor heterogeneity as well as the potential loss of ER expression due to endocrine resistance, should be considered. Including patients with ER-low-positive BC in clinical trials for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) might improve the understanding of this entity and allow novel therapeutic approaches. The design and conduction of randomized clinical trials regarding this subgroup of patients are greatly anticipated.

Reliance of agency-approved and guideline-recommended therapies on surrogate endpoints in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).

e13085 Background: Surrogate endpoints, such as progression-free survival (PFS) and event-free survival (EFS), are used for accelerated approval in various cancers, including TNBC. Here we review the use of surrogates and clinical outcomes in determining agency approval and guideline recommendation. Methods: Phase 2/3 TNBC trials and trials including TNBC subgroups reporting hazard ratios (HR) for clinical and surrogate endpoints were identified through a systematic search of LARVOL CLIN, PubMed, and conference proceedings. Trials that only evaluated cytotoxic agents and did not report EFS, PFS and/ or overall survival (OS) HR values were excluded. We performed a descriptive analysis of agency and guideline approvals in relation to therapeutic benefit as measured by surrogate outcomes and OS. Results: 21 TNBC cohorts and 1 pooled analysis studying 17 different targeted therapies for TNBC were included. There are 3 targeted therapies that have agency approval and 7 targeted therapies that are recommended by either the NCCN, EMA and ASCO guidelines. Of the two FDA and EMA-approved therapies, pembrolizumab + chemotherapy (PBL + CHT) showed PFS/EFS benefit for early TNBC and PDL1+ metastatic (m) TNBC but only OS benefit for PDL1+ mTNBC, whereas sacituzumab showed significant benefit for both PFS and OS for mTNBC. Four therapies (olaparib for BRCA+ mTNBC, bevacizumab for early TNBC, talazoparib for BRCA+ mTNBC and PBL + CHT for PD-L1+ mTNBC) are recommended by guidelines without having a significant OS benefit. Conclusions: Surrogate outcomes are heavily relied upon for TNBC guideline recommendation. Despite the need for timely access to novel TNBC therapeutics, clinical outcomes should be followed to ensure benefit once they have been reached. An up-to-date digitized trial results repository would ensure expedient review of clinical endpoints. [Table: see text]

Abstract PD1-06: Black patients with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) have enriched stromal tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) and receive preferential benefit from neoadjuvant immunotherapy

Abstract Introduction TNBC is overrepresented in Black women, and Black patients with TNBC have worse clinical outcomes compared to non-Black patients. This disparity likely results from racial differences in clinical, biological, and demographic features of TNBC and social determinants of health. Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy is current standard of care for high-risk TNBC. However, Black patients have been poorly represented in immunotherapy TNBC trials, making it difficult to assess comparative efficacy of immunotherapy in Black patients. Methods We utilized two TNBC neoadjuvant trials to assess racial differences in the tumor immune microenvironment composition and evaluate impact of race on response to chemotherapy vs chemoimmunotherapy. NeoSTOP trial (NCT02413320) randomized 100 stage I-III TNBC patients to receive neoadjuvant carboplatin/paclitaxel + doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (CbP+AC) or carboplatin/docetaxel (CbD). NeoPACT trial (NCT03639948) enrolled 120 patients with stage I-III TNBC who received neoadjuvant CbD + pembrolizumab (CbD+P). sTILs were centrally quantified, and RNA extracted from pretreatment tissue was subjected to next-generation sequencing. Relative leukocyte fractions were computed by CIBERSORTx. Factors were tested as predictors of pathologic complete response (pCR) using logistic regression analysis. Event-free survival (EFS) was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between groups by log-rank test, followed by Cox regression analysis. Results The study population includes 197 patients with known race, sTILs, and gene expression data (84 patients from NeoSTOP, 113 from NeoPACT). 15/84 (18%) patients in NeoSTOP and 20/113 (18%) patients in NeoPACT self-reported Black race. There was no significant difference in age, T or N stage, or germline BRCA1/2 mutation status by race in either study. Black patients had significantly higher sTILs than non-Black patients (median 40% vs 15%, P=0.048) and were more likely to have ≥20% sTILs than non-Black patients (66% vs 44%, P=0.026). There was no significant difference in pCR by race in NeoSTOP (OR=0.60, 95% CI 0.19-1.84, P=0.37; pCR 47% for Black vs 59% for non-Black). In contrast, in NeoPACT, Black patients had a significantly higher pCR compared to non-Black patients (OR=3.27, 95% CI 1.01-10.64, P=0.049; pCR 79% for Black vs 53% for non-Black). In NeoSTOP, EFS was similar for Black and non-Black patients (3-year EFS 92% and 94%, respectively, HR=0.88, 95% CI 0.11-7.28, P=0.90). In NeoPACT, EFS was numerically higher in Black vs non-Black patients (3-year EFS 93% and 81%, respectively, HR=0.43, 95% CI 0.05-3.36, P=0.40); NeoPACT survival follow-up is ongoing at the time of this report. On CIBERSORTx analysis, Black patients had relative depletion of immunosuppressive pro-tumorigenic M2 macrophages (P=0.005) and CD4+ memory resting T cells (P=0.021) compared to non-Black patients. Conclusions Compared to non-Black patients, Black patients with TNBC are more likely to have immune-enriched tumors with lower relative abundance of immunosuppressive leukocytes. These findings suggest potential for higher relative magnitude of benefit from checkpoint inhibitor therapy in Black compared to non-Black patients. Supporting this biological hypothesis, we noted that Black and non-Black patients had equivalent rates of pCR with neoadjuvant chemotherapy; however, pCR rate among Black patients was significantly higher than in non-Black patients when treated with neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy. These findings should be confirmed in other studies and can optimize utilization of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy. Our findings also underscore the importance of efforts to address disparity in access and use of immunotherapy in Black patients. Citation Format: Shane R. Stecklein, Rachel Yoder, Roberto Salgado, Joshua M. Staley, Anne O’Dea, Lauren Nye, Manana Elia, Deepti Satelli, Gregory Crane, Richard McKittrick, Andrew K. Godwin, Qamar Khan, Priyanka Sharma. Black patients with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) have enriched stromal tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) and receive preferential benefit from neoadjuvant immunotherapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr PD1-06.

Predictive Biomarkers for Response to Immunotherapy in Triple Negative Breast Cancer: Promises and Challenges.

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a highly heterogeneous disease with a poor prognosis and a paucity of therapeutic options. In recent years, immunotherapy has emerged as a new treatment option for patients with TNBC. However, this therapeutic evolution is paralleled by a growing need for biomarkers which allow for a better selection of patients who are most likely to benefit from this immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based regimen. These biomarkers will not only facilitate a better optimization of treatment strategies, but they will also avoid unnecessary side effects in non-responders, and limit the increasing financial toxicity linked to the use of these agents. Huge efforts have been deployed to identify predictive biomarkers for the ICI, but until now, the fruits of this labor remained largely unsatisfactory. Among clinically validated biomarkers, only programmed death-ligand 1 protein (PD-L1) expression has been prospectively assessed in TNBC trials. In addition to this, microsatellite instability and a high tumor mutational burden are approved as tumor agnostic biomarkers, but only a small percentage of TNBC fits this category. Furthermore, TNBC should no longer be approached as a single biological entity, but rather as a complex disease with different molecular, clinicopathological, and tumor microenvironment subgroups. This review provides an overview of the validated and evolving predictive biomarkers for a response to ICI in TNBC.

Nanomaterial-assisted CRISPR gene-engineering - A hallmark for triple-negative breast cancer therapeutics advancement.

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most violent class of tumor and accounts for 20–24% of total breast carcinoma, in which frequently rare mutation occurs in high frequency. The poor prognosis, recurrence, and metastasis in the brain, heart, liver and lungs decline the lifespan of patients by about 21 months, emphasizing the need for advanced treatment. Recently, the adaptive immunity mechanism of archaea and bacteria, called clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) combined with nanotechnology, has been utilized as a potent gene manipulating tool with an extensive clinical application in cancer genomics due to its easeful usage and cost-effectiveness. However, CRISPR/Cas are arguably the efficient technology that can be made efficient via organic material-assisted approaches. Despite the efficacy of the CRISPR/Cas@nano complex, problems regarding successful delivery, biodegradability, and toxicity remain to render its medical implications. Therefore, this review is different in focus from past reviews by (i) detailing all possible genetic mechanisms of TNBC occurrence; (ii) available treatments and gene therapies for TNBC; (iii) overview of the delivery system and utilization of CRISPR-nano complex in TNBC, and (iv) recent advances and related toxicity of CRISPR-nano complex towards clinical trials for TNBC.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of BRCA1/2 mutation for predicting the effect of platinum-based chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer

IntroductionPlatinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) remains the mainstay of treatments for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). TNBC is a heterogeneous group, the issue of whether BRCA1/2 mutation carriers have a particular sensitivity to platinum agents is inconclusive. We conducted a meta-analysis to explore the relationship between BRCA1/2 mutation and PBC susceptibility in individuals with TNBC, aiming to gain more information on the size of the benefit of PBC in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Materials and methodsAll studies applying PBC with a subgroup of BRCA1/2 status were included. All endpoints, including pCR and RCB in the neoadjuvant phase, DFS in the adjuvant phase, ORR, PFS, and OS in the advanced phase, were assessed using HRs and 95% Cl. ResultsFrom the 22 studies included, there were 2158 patients with TNBC, with 392 (18%) bearing the BRCA1/2 gene mutation. Based on 13 studies applying neoadjuvant PBC, we discovered that BRCA1/2 mutation was substantially associated with a 17.6% increased pCR rate (HR 1.32, 95% CI 1.17–1.49, p < 0.00001; I2 = 51%). Same result was observed in RCB0/I index (HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.08–1.76, P = 0.009; I2 = 0%). The meta-analysis of 6 trials addressing advanced therapy revealed that ORR rates were significantly higher in patients with BRCA1/2 mutation (HR 1.91, 95% CI 1.48–2.47, p < 0.00001; I2 = 32%), as well as PFS(HR 1.13, 95% CI 0.81–1.57, P = 0.47; I2 = 0%) and OS (HR 1.89, 95% CI 1.22–2.92, P = 0.004; I2 = 0%). ConclusionAccording to our meta-analysis of 22 trials in TNBC, BRCA1/2 mutation carriers were significantly more sensitive to PBC regimens, especially in neoadjuvant and advanced therapy.

SY14-3 Immunotherapeutic strategies for each breast cancer subtype

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICBs) have progressed rapidly in various cancer types and have become standard treatments. However, the development of ICBs for breast cancer has been delayed due to its lower immunogenicity compared to other cancer types. There has been gradual progress in understanding the differences in immunogenicity among subtypes and the tumor microenvironment, and IMpassion130, a phase III randomized controlled trial in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), is expected to benefit most from ICBs, was the first to be conducted.

Abstract 2754: LYL797, a ROR1 CAR T-cell therapy with genetic and epigenetic reprogramming for solid tumors

Abstract Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has been shown to produce profound results in the treatment of certain hematologic malignancies, however treatment of solid tumors with CAR T cells has not been as successful. Studies have suggested that T-cell exhaustion plays a role in limiting the ability of CAR T cells to eradicate solid tumors. Additionally, stem-like qualities of T cells have been associated with better outcomes in patients treated with cellular therapies, including CAR T cells. Therefore, maintaining stem-like qualities and overcoming T-cell exhaustion may be key to improving clinical efficacy of CAR T cells in patients with solid tumors. ROR1 is a cell surface antigen expressed in several solid tumor types and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). ROR1 expression has been reported in 57% of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), as well as 42% of adenocarcinoma and 12% of squamous cell carcinoma subtypes of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). These expression data of ROR1 in TNBC and NSCLC provide support for anti-ROR1 agents as a therapeutic strategy for these cancers. LYL797 is a novel, ROR1-targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell product that incorporates genetic and epigenetic reprogramming technologies, Gen-R and Epi-R, to overcome barriers of CAR T-cell therapies in solid tumors. The ROR1-specific CAR contains a single-chain variable fragment (scFv) derived from an R12 rabbit monoclonal antibody that recognizes and binds with high specificity to human ROR1. Gen-R is ex vivo genetic reprogramming technology that engineers CAR T cells to overexpress c-Jun. Dysregulation of activator protein 1 (AP-1) has been implicated in CAR T-cell exhaustion, and studies have demonstrated that overexpression of c-Jun renders CAR T cells less susceptible to exhaustion, enhancing both anti-tumor efficacy and persistence in preclinical models of hematologic and solid tumors. Epi-R is a proprietary optimized manufacturing process that results in maintenance of stem-like phenotype and function of T-cell products. In preclinical studies LYL797 cells reprogrammed with Gen-R and Epi-R led to improved functional activity in the presence of ROR1+ tumor cells compared to conventional ROR1 CAR T cells. Additional studies are underway to determine the mechanisms by which antitumor activity of LYL797 in ROR1-positive solid tumor xenograft models is enhanced. LYL797 is anticipated to enter into Phase 1 clinical trials for TNBC and NSCLC in 2022. Citation Format: Spencer Park, Courtney Simianer, Sydney Spadinger, Xiao Wang, Purnima Sundar, Shobha Potluri, Rachel Lynn, Bijan Boldajipour, Grace Wang, Neeraj Sharma, Hajime Hiraragi, Veena Krishnamoorthy, Suman Kumar Vodnala, E-Ching Ong, Chang-Chih Wu, Martin Wohlfahrt, Byoung Ryu, Lisa Song, Brian D. Weitzner, Howell Moffett, Marc Lajoie, Scott Boyken, Tamer Shabaneh, Shivani Srivastava, Tina Albertson, Blythe Sather. LYL797, a ROR1 CAR T-cell therapy with genetic and epigenetic reprogramming for solid tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 2754.

Abstract 1010: LIG1 deletion predicts chemotherapy resistance, chromosomal instability, and poor prognosis in triple negative breast cancer

Abstract Introduction: Cytotoxic chemotherapy for sporadic Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) remains the standard of care and the recent approval for adjuvant PD1 therapy is not biomarker guided. Pathological complete response (pCR) is often not achieved and portends poor survival. Predictive markers for individual drugs have proven elusive. Approach: Microscaled proteogenomics (MPG) was applied to snap-frozen TNBC clinical trial core needle biopsies obtained before treatment with carboplatin and docetaxel (WashU: NCT201404107 and BCM: NCT02544987). Clinical endpoints for discovery analysis were pathological complete response (pCR) and residual cancer burden (RCB). Standard non-parametric statistical tests were employed to identify proteogenomic features associated with these endpoints. Results: Copy number aberrations (CNA) are a recurrent feature of TNBC and a potential driver of chemotherapy sensitivity. We therefore sought CNA with concordant changes at the mRNA and protein levels that also associate with pCR status. Genes located within a recurrent interstitial deletion at chromosomal location 19q13.3 were the most significantly down-regulated at mRNA and protein level in chemotherapy resistant cases. 19q13.3 encodes multiple DNA damage response (DDR) genes; however, only LIG1, a DNA ligase required for lagging strand synthesis and DNA repair, showed concordant changes at both the mRNA and protein level. In multiple independent TNBC data sets, LIG1 deletion was associated lack of pCR and poor metastasis-free survival. Additionally in the BrighTNess TNBC trial lower LIG1 mRNA levels were associated with increased chemotherapy resistance in the carboplatin containing arms (no pCR and residual cancer burden I-III; p=0.0008 and 0.003 respectively). In PDX-derived short-term cultures and PDXs treated with docetaxel or carboplatin, a specific association of carboplatin resistance with LIG1 deletion was observed. LIG1 depleted-tumors did not harbor elevated scores for homologous recombination defect signature, suggesting LIG1 loss is an orthogonal pathway for TNBC pathogenesis The high chromosomal instability index in LIG1 deletion tumors in our TNBC study was robustly reproduced in multiple datasets (including TCGA-BRCA ; Metastatic breast cancer project). LIG1 copy number deletion was also associated with poor progression free survival, and high chromosomal instability in multiple other cancers (including TCGA-​UCEC HR=2.23, TCGA-HNSC HR=1.46, TCGA-PRAD HR=2.07, TCGA- COAD HR=1.75 and TCGA-KIRP HR=4.00). Conclusion: Deletion of LIG1 is associated with chromosomal instability in TNBC and occurs in tumors without genomic evidence for defects in homologous recombination. Other clinical features of LIG1 deleted TNBC and how LIG1 loss may cause chromosomal instability and tumorigenesis will be discussed. Citation Format: Meenakshi Anurag, Eric Jaehnig, Jonathan Lei, Beom-Jun Kim, Anh Minh Tran Huynh, Yongchao Dou, Tanmayi Vashist, Erik Bergstrom, Xuxu Gou, Viktoriya Korchina, Donna Marie Muzny, Kristen Otte, Harshavardhan Doddapaneni, Lacey Dobrolecki, Gloria Vittone Echeverria, Bora Lim, Mothaffar Rimawi, Karsten Krug, Ian Hageman, Henry Rodriguez, Ana I. Robles, Tara Hiltke, Kent Osborne, Michael Gillette, George Miles, Steven Carr, Michael T Lewis, Bing Zhang, Foluso Ademuyiwa, Shankha Satpathy, Matthew J. Ellis. LIG1 deletion predicts chemotherapy resistance, chromosomal instability, and poor prognosis in triple negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 1010.

Phase 2 study of response-guided neoadjuvant sacituzumab govitecan (IMMU-132) in patients with localized triple-negative breast cancer: Results from the NeoSTAR trial.

512 Background: Sacituzumab govitecan (SG), a novel antibody-drug conjugate in which the topoisomerase 1 inhibitor SN-38 (active metabolite of irinotecan) is linked to a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting the tumor antigen Trop2, is currently approved for treatment of patients (pts) with pre-treated metastatic triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). We conducted a phase 2 study evaluating neoadjuvant (NA) SG as upfront therapy for pts with localized TNBC (NCT04230109). The primary objective was to assess pathological complete response (pCR) rate in breast and lymph nodes (ypT0/isN0) with SG. Secondary objectives included assessment of radiological response rate, evaluation of the safety and tolerability (CTCAE v5.0) and event-free survival (EFS). Methods: Patients with localized TNBC (tumor size ≥1cm, or any size if node positive) with no prior treatment were eligible. SG was administered IV on Days 1, 8 of each 21-day cycle at a starting dose of 10 mg/kg for 4 cycles. After 4 cycles, patients with biopsy-proven residual disease, considered as no pCR for primary endpoint, had the option to receive additional NA therapy at the discretion of the treating physician. Radiologic response (US or MRI) was defined by RECIST version 1.1 using a composite response of CR &amp; PR. Standard descriptive statistics were utilized, including 95% binomial confidence intervals for all rates estimated. Results: From 7/14/20 – 8/31/21, 50 pts were enrolled (median age = 48.5; 11 stage I disease, 24 stage II, 11 stage III, 4 unknown; 62% node negative). The majority (98%; n = 49) of pts completed 4 cycles of SG. Overall, the radiological response rate with SG alone was 62% (n = 31, 95% CI 48%, 77%). 26 pts proceeded directly to surgery after SG. Overall, the pCR rate with SG alone was 30% (n = 15/50, 95% CI 18%, 45%). The other 11 pts had RCB-1 (n = 3), RCB-2 (n = 5), and RCB-3 (n = 3) disease, respectively. Of the 24 pts who received additional NA therapy, 6 had a pCR (3 received anthracycline-based regimen, 2 carboplatin/taxane, and 1 docetaxel/cyclophosphamide). Among pts with a germline BRCA mutation (n = 8), 7 proceeded directly to surgery after SG and 6 had a pCR (86%, 95% CI 42%, 99%). The most common AEs with SG were nausea (82%, n = 41), fatigue (78%, n = 39), alopecia (76%, n = 38), neutropenia (58%, n = 29), anemia (36%, n = 18), and rash (48%, n = 24). 6% of pts required dose-reduction. No pts discontinued SG therapy due to disease progression or AEs; 1 discontinued due to minimal response per investigator preference. At the time of data cut-off (1/18/22), no pts experienced disease recurrence. Updated biomarker and EFS results will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: In the first neoadjuvant trial in TNBC with an ADC, SG demonstrated single agent efficacy in localized TNBC. Further research on optimal duration of SG as well as NA combination strategies, including immunotherapy, are needed. Clinical trial information: NCT04230109.

Narrative review of current status and recommendations in treatment for advanced triple-negative breast cancer.

The encouraging results of clinical trials for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients in recent years have gradually formed a system for the therapeutic regimen. As immunotherapy and precision therapy based on biomarkers have brought a new era to TNBC, it has become more crucial for clinicians to update the recommended treatment regimens for advanced TNBC patients. We searched literatures related to the treatment for advanced TNBC from 2014 to 2022 on PubMed and sorted out them. In addition, the 2021-2022 guidelines in the part of treatment for advanced TNBC were downloaded on the official website of the guidelines referred to, which were summarized meanwhile. We summarized the current status of treatment for advanced TNBC from four aspects: immunotherapy, targeted therapy, antibody-drug conjugates (ADC) drug therapy and chemotherapy. The recommended therapeutic principles for the aspect of advanced TNBC in 2022 Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) guidelines were proposed in combination with international guidelines and conference recommendations. It was emphasized that the detection and evaluation of biomarkers or targeting molecules should be the basis for choosing therapeutic regimens in this review and clinicians are supposed to accurately screen the population to achieve better treatment outcomes and prognosis for patients with advanced TNBC.

Abstract OT2-30-01: Nordictrip, a translational randomized phase-3study exploring the effect of the addition of capecitabine to carboplatinum-based chemotherapy in early “triple negative” breast cancer, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04335669

Abstract Background: A striking heterogeneity combined with an absence of highly efficient targeted treatments necessitates a continued effort to optimize the choice of chemotherapy for patients with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Neoadjuvant therapy has become the standard of care for high risk TNBC in order to potentially reduce breast and axillary surgery, start medical treatment early, allow genomic screening and guide post neoadjuvant therapy. Much attention is drawn to the use of immunotherapy in early TNBC, but there is also interesting data suggesting a potential to optimize the use of conventional chemotherapy. According to one meta-analysis including data from nine randomized controlled trials, the addition of platinum salts in the preoperative setting increases the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate in TNBC (Poggio 2018). A second meta-analysis, evaluating the effect of capecitabine in early breast cancer indicates an additional benefit from adding capecitabine to conventional chemotherapy in terms of an increased recurrence-free survival in the subset of TNBC (Mackelenbergh SABCS 2019). An adjuvant trial in TNBC suggests that the beneficial effect of capecitabine may be confined to patients with a non-basal like phenotype of TNBC (Lluch 2020), a subset that correlates with the homologous repair non-deficient subset which constitutes 41 % of TNBC in a mainly south Swedish population based cohort (Staaf 2019). The effect of capecitabine in platinum treated early TNBC is unknown. Objectives: We are conducting a multi-center randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect on the pCR rate by the addition of capecitabine to optimal platinum based and dose dense preoperative chemotherapy in early TNBC. Method: 820 patients (pts) with early TNBC stage 1 (≥20 mm) - 3 will be randomized 1:1 between two treatment arms A and B. A: Epirubicine Cyclophosphamide (EC) q2w x 4 followed by Carboplatin AUC 5 q3w with weekly paclitaxel x 12. B: Epirubicine Cyclophosphamide with capecitabine daily for two weeks (CEX) q3w x 4 followed by Carboplatin AUC 5 q3w with weekly paclitaxel x 12 The primary endpoint is pCR rate in the different treatment strata, and the primary translational endpoint will be the potential difference of treatment effect stratified for HRD-status in the primary tumor. Secondary endpoints include IDFS in subsets of TNBC, eg according to gene-expression-based subtypes of TNBC (Lehmann 2011, Burstein 2015), and germline mutation status of hereditary breast cancer genes. Tumor material for genotypig is collected at baseline, at surgery and optionally after two treatment cycles. Sequential blood samples are collected for tsDNA analysis during and after treatment termination. Results: The trial, which is a collaborative effort between the national breast cancer groups in the participating countries, has been postponed by the pandemic but is now recruiting according to plan. So far 56 patients out of 820 have been recruited at 15 sites in Sweden and Denmark. Additional Sites in Sweden, Denmark, Iceland and Finland are preparing to join the study. For update please see: www.NordicTrip.se; E-mail address: Nordictrip.onkologi@skane.se Citation Format: Niklas Loman, Barbro Linderholm, Johan Ahlgren, Siker Kimbung, Lina Zander, Heidi Grill Magnusson, Eva-Christin Kjellman, Ann Julia Raaberg, Maj-Britt Raaby Jensen, Åke Borg, Johan Staaf, Anders Ståhlberg, Pär-Ola Bendahl, Anne-Vibeke Laenkholm, Minna Tanner, Olöf Bjarnadóttir, Oskar Johannsson, Bent Ejlertsen, Henrik Lindman. Nordictrip, a translational randomized phase-3study exploring the effect of the addition of capecitabine to carboplatinum-based chemotherapy in early “triple negative” breast cancer, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04335669 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-30-01.

Abstract P2-01-05: Impact of post-treatment ctDNA and residual cancer burden (RCB) on outcomes in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and residual disease

Abstract Introduction: Residual disease (RD) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is associated with high risk of recurrence in TNBC. RCB classification is prognostic in patients with RD. Recent studies show that post-NACT circulating cell-free tumor DNA (ctDNA) also provides prognostic information in patients with RD. Most TNBC patients with RD receive adjuvant therapy after surgery (chemotherapy and/or radiation), thus ctDNA status at completion of all adjuvant therapy (end of treatment, EOT) may be a better indicator of long-term prognosis. Furthermore, the impact of EOT ctDNA status on prognosis in context of RCB is of interest. Utilizing data from a prospective registry, the objective of this study was to investigate the impact of EOT ctDNA status and RCB class on outcomes in TNBC patients with RD. We hypothesized that RCB and EOT ctDNA status may provide complementary prognostic information. Methods: Study population included TNBC patients with RD post-NACT and available EOT plasma samples who were enrolled in an IRB-approved multisite prospective registry between 2011 and 2018. EOT samples were collected after completion (1-6 months) of all curative treatment (local and systemic). ctDNA was isolated and subjected to next generation sequencing (QIAseq 275-gene Human Comprehensive Cancer Panel on an Illumina NextSeq 550). Samples demonstrating pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant(s) with 3-40% allelic frequencies were considered ctDNA positive. Variants with allelic frequencies ≥40% were included in ctDNA positive status only if not present in ClinVar8/dbSNP9 as a known germline variant. The impact of EOT ctDNA status and RCB on event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated according to the Kaplan-Meier method and compared among groups by log-rank test, followed by Cox regression analysis. Results: For 47 TNBC patients with RD and available EOT plasma sample, the median age was 47 years, and 43% had node-positive disease at diagnosis. RCB class distribution was as follows: RCB I=28%, RCB II=49%, RCB III=15%, RCB unknown=8%. 45% of patients received adjuvant chemotherapy (59% with RCB II-III received adjuvant chemotherapy), and 68% received adjuvant radiation. EOT ctDNA was positive in 34% (16/47) of patients and was associated with higher T stage (p=0.012), TNM stage (p=0.033) and trend toward higher RCB class (p=0.078). ctDNA positivity rates in RCB I, II and III classes were 23%, 30% and 71%, respectively. Among all patients, 3-year EFS and OS were 71% and 73%, respectively. Table 1 provides 3-year EFS and OS by ctDNA status in all patients and by RCB class. ctDNA positive status was associated with inferior EFS and OS. Conclusion: EOT ctDNA positivity was noted in one-third of TNBC patients with residual disease and was highly prognostic, with almost half of patients with ctDNA positivity suffering an EFS event by 3 years. Patients with RCB III had very poor outcome (3-year EFS ≤20%) regardless of ctDNA status. However, in RCB classes I/II, ctDNA provided further prognostic utility, as ctDNA negative patients with RCB I/II had excellent outcomes (3-year EFS &amp;gt;90%). These findings should be confirmed in other studies and provide insights into the role of ctDNA for patient stratification/selection in residual disease adjuvant therapy intensification trials for TNBC. 3-year EFS3-year OSAll patients: ctDNA positive vs ctDNA negative56% vs 78%, HR 3.02 (95% CI: 1.01-9.01), p=0.03856% vs 82%, HR 3.05 (95% CI: 1.02-9.13), p=0.037RCB I/II: ctDNA positive vs ctDNA negative73% vs 92%, HR 4.38, p=0.07873% vs 92%, HR 3.03, p=0.159RCB III: ctDNA positive vs ctDNA negative0% vs 20%, HR 1.67, p=0.5610% vs 20%, HR 1.30, p=0.765 Citation Format: Priyanka Sharma, Shane R Stecklein, Bruce F Kimler, Rachel Yoder, Kelsey Schwensen, Joshua M Staley, Qamar J Khan, Anne P O'Dea, Lauren E Nye, Manana Elia, Jaimie Heldstab, Trisha Home, Stephen Hyter, Kamilla Isakova, Harsh B Pathak, Andrew K Godwin. Impact of post-treatment ctDNA and residual cancer burden (RCB) on outcomes in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and residual disease [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-01-05.

LncRNA Uc003xsl.1-Mediated Activation of the NFκB/IL8 Axis Promotes Progression of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

These findings identify an epigenetic-driven NFκB/IL8 cascade initiated by a lncRNA, whose aberrant activation contributes to tumor metastasis and poor survival in patients with triple-negative breast cancer.