Study Objectives:To measure the impact of a program using PEWS, as an admission level of care triage tool in the PED, on unanticipated transfers to a higher level of care in the first 12 hours after admission.Methods: This is an analysis of the years before and after (2008 and 2009) implementation of a PEWS program for patients being admitted with respiratory complaints to a dedicated children's hospital. Chief complaints from ED triage were used to identify all patients presenting with respiratory complaints, and admitted patients were assessed for unanticipated transfer to a higher level of care in the first 12 hours after admission. Demographics were assessed for differences between groups as well. Chi-squared tests for differences in proportions were used.Results: There were 40 unanticipated transfers in 2008 and 24 in 2009 (p<0.05). The distribution of the admissions in 2008 (1052 or 90.8% to Floor; 96 or 8.3% to IMC; 11 or 0.9% to ICU) and 2009 (1316 or 91.5% to Floor; 109 or 7.6% to IMC; 13 or 0.9% to ICU) were not significantly different, indicating patients in 2009 were not routinely over-triaged.Conclusion: Implementation of a program in the PED using PEWS as a triage tool for in-patient admission nearly halved the number of unanticipated transfers to a higher level of care without significantly over-triaging. Study Objectives:To measure the impact of a program using PEWS, as an admission level of care triage tool in the PED, on unanticipated transfers to a higher level of care in the first 12 hours after admission. Methods: This is an analysis of the years before and after (2008 and 2009) implementation of a PEWS program for patients being admitted with respiratory complaints to a dedicated children's hospital. Chief complaints from ED triage were used to identify all patients presenting with respiratory complaints, and admitted patients were assessed for unanticipated transfer to a higher level of care in the first 12 hours after admission. Demographics were assessed for differences between groups as well. Chi-squared tests for differences in proportions were used. Results: There were 40 unanticipated transfers in 2008 and 24 in 2009 (p<0.05). The distribution of the admissions in 2008 (1052 or 90.8% to Floor; 96 or 8.3% to IMC; 11 or 0.9% to ICU) and 2009 (1316 or 91.5% to Floor; 109 or 7.6% to IMC; 13 or 0.9% to ICU) were not significantly different, indicating patients in 2009 were not routinely over-triaged. Conclusion: Implementation of a program in the PED using PEWS as a triage tool for in-patient admission nearly halved the number of unanticipated transfers to a higher level of care without significantly over-triaging.
Read full abstract