Triage Criteria Research Articles

Rapid triage and transfer system for patients with proven Covid-19 at emergency department.

COVID-19 is a viral disease notorious for frequent worldwide outbreaks. It is difficult to control, thereby resulting in overload of the healthcare system. A possible solution to prevent overcrowding is rapid triage of patients, which makes it possible to focus care on the high-risk patients and minimize the impact of crowding on patient prognosis. The triage algorithm assessed self-sufficiency, oximetry, systolic blood pressure, and the Glasgow coma scale. Compliance with the triage protocol was defined as fulfillment of all protocol steps, including assignment of the correct level of care. Triage was considered successful if there was no change in the scope of care (e.g., unscheduled hospital admission, transfer to different level of care) or if there was unexpected death within 48 hours. A total of 929 patients were enrolled in the study. Triage criteria were fulfilled in 825 (88.8%) patients. Within 48 hours, unscheduled hospital admission, transfer to different level of care, or unexpected death occurred in 56 (6.0%), 6 (0.6%), and 5 (0.5%) patients, respectively. The risk of unscheduled hospital admission or transfer to different level of care was significantly increased if triage criteria were not fulfilled [13.1% vs. 76.1%, RR 5.8 (3.8-8.3), p < 0.001; 0.5% vs. 5.2%, RR 11.4 (2.3-57.7), p = 0.036, respectively]. The proposed algorithm for triage of patients with proven COVID-19 is a simple, fast, and reliable tool for rapid sorting for outpatient treatment, hospitalization on a standard ward, or assignment to an intensive care unit.

Predictors of clinical deterioration and intensive care unit admission in trauma patients transferred from northern Quebec to a level 1 trauma centre: a retrospective cohort study.

Trauma care in Nunavik, Quebec, is highly challenging. Geographic distances and delays in transport can translate into precarious patient transfers to tertiary trauma care centres. The objective of this study was to identify predictors of clinical deterioration during transport and eventual intensive care unit (ICU) admission for trauma patients transferred from Nunavik to a tertiary trauma care centre. This is a retrospective cohort study using the Montreal General Hospital (MGH) trauma registry. All adult trauma patients transferred from Nunavik and admitted to the MGH from 2010 to 2019 were included. Main outcomes of interest were hemodynamic and neurologic deterioration during transport and ICU admission. In total, 704 patients were transferred from Nunavik and admitted to the MGH during the study period. The median age was 33 (interquartile range [IQR] 23-47) years and the median Injury Severity Score was 10 (IQR 5-17). On multiple regression analysis, transport time from site of injury to the MGH (odds ratio [OR] 1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.06), thoracic injuries (OR 1.75, 95% CI 1.03-2.99), and head and neck injuries (OR 3.76, 95% CI 2.10-6.76) predicted clinical deterioration during transfer. Injury Severity Score (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.08), abnormal local Glasgow Coma Scale score (OR 2.57, 95% CI 1.34-4.95), clinical deterioration during transfer (OR 4.22, 95% CI 1.99-8.93), traumatic brain injury (OR 2.44, 95% CI 1.05-5.68), and transfusion requirement at the MGH (OR 4.63, 95% CI 2.35-9.09) were independent predictors of ICU admission. Our study identified several predictors of clinical deterioration during transfer and eventual ICU admission for trauma patients transferred from Nunavik. These factors could be used to refine triage criteria in Nunavik for more timely evacuation and higher level care during transport.

Abstract TMP13: Prehospital Stroke Scales Are Non-Inferior to NIHSS in Prediction of Intravenous Thrombolysis Use in a Large Telestroke Network

Introduction: Recent studies report similar outcomes with antiplatelet drugs and intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in patients with minor nondisabling ischemic stroke. These patients still meet emergent triage criteria and can increase the burden on stroke systems through prehospital stroke activation. Prehospital large vessel occlusion (LVO) scales can improve triage of LVO patients but have not been evaluated as tools to predict IVT administration. We sought to determine if common LVO scales can predict IVT use in a large academic telestroke practice. Methods: This retrospective study included all video telestroke consults performed in a large academic telestroke network from 2019-2020. Patients were excluded if they were on anticoagulation, presented beyond 4.5 hours from last known well, or family declined IVT due to goals of care. We recorded presenting NIHSS and IVT recommendations. NIHSS was used to calculate 7 LVO scales (RACE, G-FAST, FAST-ED, VAN, PASS, 3I-SS, and C-STAT). Scale performance was assessed by calculating area under curve (AUC) and compared to NIHSS total score using the DeLong test. Youden cutpoint was established for each scale and subsequently used to calculate sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), and accuracy. Results: A total of 513 patients were included; 205/513 (40%) were recommended IVT. Median (IQR) NIHSS was 1 (0-3) in non-IVT patients and 6 (4-11) in IVT patients. The RACE and G-FAST scales were noninferior to the NIHSS in predicting IVT recommendation (Table 1). Conclusion: The RACE and G-FAST scales may be useful triage tools to identify patients needing emergent stroke evaluation for consideration of IVT.

Experience of moral distress among doctors at emergency departments in Stockholm during the Covid-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study

ABSTRACT Purpose The COVID-19 pandemic and consequent strain on healthcare globally shed light on the concept of moral distress among healthcare workers, albeit to a smaller extent among doctors at emergency departments. This study aimed to examine moral distress as perceived by medical doctors working at emergency departments in Stockholm during the pandemic, with the purpose of investigating causes of moral distress and methods to manage moral distress. Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted with twelve doctors working at two emergency departments. A questionnaire was developed based on previous research and the interviews were analysed qualitatively through thematic analysis. Results The themes ”The factors that precipitated moral distress”, “Experience of workplace support” and “Coping strategies” as well as seven subthemes and 15 codes were identified. The informants reported on various situations with different causes of moral distress. Common causes were resource depletion, such as hospital bed shortages, and following stricter triage criteria. Informants reported varying ways of managing moral distress. Conclusions Informants experienced moral distress when faced with challenges such as resource depletion, rules and regulations, and colleagues’ decisions. The informants who chose to seek support received it from their workplace, which helped them cope with their experiences. Some informants chose to not seek support.

Review article: Pre-hospital trauma guidelines and access to lifesaving interventions in Australia and Aotearoa/New Zealand.

The centralisation of trauma services in western countries has led to an improvement in patient outcomes. Effective trauma systems include a pre-hospital trauma system. Delivery of high-level pre-hospital trauma care must include identification of potential major trauma patients, access and correct application of lifesaving interventions (LSIs) and timely transport to definitive care. Globally, many nations endorse nationwide pre-hospital major trauma triage guidelines, to ensure a universal approach to patient care. This paper examined clinical guidelines from all 10 EMS in Australia and Aotearoa/New Zealand. All relevant trauma guidelines were included, and key information was extracted. Authors compared major trauma triage criteria, all LSI included in guidelines, and guidelines for transport to definitive care. The identification of major trauma patients varied between all 10 EMS, with no universal criteria. The most common approach to trauma triage included a three-step assessment process: physiological criteria, identified injuries and mechanism of injury. Disparity between physiological criteria, injuries and mechanism was found when comparing guidelines. All 10 EMS had fundamental LSI included in their trauma guidelines. Fundamental LSI included haemorrhage control (arterial tourniquets, pelvic binders), non-invasive airway management (face mask ventilation, supraglottic airway devices) and pleural wall needle decompression. Variation in more advanced LSI was evident between EMS. Optimising trauma triage guidelines is an important aspect of a robust and evidence driven trauma system. The lack of consensus in trauma triage identified in the present study makes benchmarking and comparison of trauma systems difficult.

A National Platform and Scoring System Allocates CAR-T Treatment Slots for Multiple Myeloma to Patients with High Likelihood of Complete Remission

Introduction Therapy of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM) with Ide-Cel is superior to alternative treatments, but availability is lower than the number of patients in need. Treatment slots are distributed by the manufacturer per country. Their allocation to individual patients is a medical, logistical and ethical challenge. Ideally, such allocation should be inclusive, fair, transparent, effective, and base on prospectively confirmed objective outcome criteria. Methods Swiss Blood Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (SBST) has established the national SBST-CAR-T MM board for allocation of Ide-Cel treatment slots. Allocation process and triage criteria were developed by clinical experts in exchange with the ethical board of the Swiss academy for medical sciences and health insurers, approved by all JACIE-accredited national centers for cellular therapies, and agreed that Ide-Cel therapy in Switzerland is only available through this allocation system. Patients are registered in parallel with request for insurance coverage in one key document. Patients had to meet qualifying approval criteria for Ide-Cel in Switzerland (relapsed and refractory MM, &amp;gt;2 prior therapy lines, triple-class-exposed). Reaching CR after Ide-Cel is associated with superior PFS. We therefore developed an algorithm to select patients with high likelihood for CR. Patient factors negatively associated with CR derived from the KarMMa trial were complemented by factors prospectively associated with inferior overall survival after CAR-T in malignant lymphoma. High tumor burden (bone marrow infiltration &amp;gt; 50% or high tumor load by PET-CT), inflammatory activity (increasede ferritin or D-dimers), ECOG patient status and comorbidities were used as negative predictive factors and combined to a sum score of 0-4. All registered patients are presented at the monthly virtual meeting and ranked according to this score. Ranking is refined based on availability of alternative treatment options, resulting in a final national ranking agreed by all board members. Because no patients with severe comorbidities were registered, this dimension was later excluded. Results Between May 2022 and April 2023 all 48 Ide-Cel regular treatment slots in Switzerland were allocated in 12 virtual meetings lasting median 55 minutes (25-70) with the participation of median 7 centers (6-8), 8 physicians (6-15), discussing in total 72 patients (median 5.5 per meeting, range 4-10) to distribute 4 slots monthly. All therapy slots were successfully allocated, including short-notice changes in availability of slots or patients requiring immediate allocation of substituting patients. 74.2% of all patients registered with the SBST CART MM board received Ide-Cel. Patient, treatment and outcome parameters were centrally collected to SBST database from 37 treated patients per April 2023. (1 patient each had cell collection failure, Ide-Cel production failure, missing outcome data). Patients were 65% triple refractory, 65 % penta refractory, 14% received prior BCMA-targeted therapy, 8% prior bispecifc antibodies and 67% had high risk cytogenetics. Best response achieved so far was CR or better in 57% of patients, PR-VGPR 16%, PD 13%, not stated/too early 13%. A low SBST-MM CAR-T Score was prospectively associated with CR (table 1, p=0.048). Each scoring dimension (ECOG, tumor load, inflammation) significantly correlated inversely with CR, while conventional characteristics for poor MM outcomes (HR CG, penta refractory disease) did not correlate. PFS and OS data is pending. Cross cohort comparison with the Real-World Experience from the US Myeloma CAR-T Consortium (Hansen et al., JCO 2023) revealed a strong trend towards higher CR rates (57% vs. 23%, p=0.10). Conclusion This algorithm prospectively selects MM patients for BCMA-CAR-T treatment to maximize CR rate. Also, this national real world cohort demonstrates the feasibility of triaging the allocation of CAR-T therapy slots based on a, fair, objective, transparent, consensual algorithm using predefined criteria. The SBST scoring system prospectively reflects differential likelyhood of CR (100&amp;gt;64&amp;gt;53&amp;gt;33%), and the scoring dimensions (ECOG, tumor load, inflammation) prospectively correlate with a CR rate of 57 %, supporting the selection process. The SBST CAR-T scoring system may be used to allocate CAR-T treatment slots to maximize benefit from this treatment.

Characterizing re-triage guidelines: A scoping review of states’ rules and regulations

BackgroundState guidelines for re-triage, or emergency inter-facility transfer, have never been characterized across the United States. MethodsAll 50 states’ Department of Health and/or Trauma System websites were reviewed for publicly available re-triage guidelines within their rules and regulations. Communication was made via phone or email to state agencies or trauma advisory committees to obtain or confirm the absence of guidelines where public data was unavailable. Guideline criteria were abstracted and grouped into domains of Center for Disease Control Field Triage Criteria: pattern/anatomy of injury, vital signs, special populations, and mechanisms of injury. Re-triage criteria were summarized across states using median and interquartile ranges for continuous data and frequencies for categorical data. Demographic data of states with and without re-triage guidelines were compared using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. ResultsRe-triage guidelines were identified for 22 of 50 states (44%). Common anatomy of injury criteria included head trauma (91% of states with guidelines), spinal cord injury (82%), chest injury (77%), and pelvic injury (73%). Common vital signs criteria included Glasgow Coma Score (91% of states) ranging from 8 to 14, systolic blood pressure (36%) ranging from 90 to 100 mm Hg, and respiratory rate (23%) with all using 10 respirations/minute. Common special populations criteria included mechanical ventilation (73% of states), age (68%) ranging from <2 or >60 years, cardiac disease (59%), and pregnancy (55%). No significant demographic differences were found between states with versus without re-triage guidelines. ConclusionA minority of US states have re-triage guidelines. Characterizing existing criteria can inform future guideline development.

Characteristics of critically ill patients with cancer associated with intensivist's perception of inappropriateness of ICU admission: A retrospective cohort study

PurposeAlthough admitting cancer patients to the ICU is no longer an issue, it may be valuable to identify patients perceived least likely to benefit from admission. Our objective was to investigate factors associated with potentially inappropriate ICU admission. MethodsRetrospective cohort study of patients with cancer with unplanned ICU admission. We classified admissions as appropriate or potentially inappropriate according to Society of Critical Care Medicine guidelines. We used logistic regression model to assess factors associated with inappropriateness for ICU admission. ResultsFrom 3384 patients, 663 (19.6%) were classified as potentially inappropriate. They received more invasive mechanical ventilation (25.3% vs 12.5%, P < 0.001) and vasopressors (34.4% vs 30.1%, P = 0.034), had higher ICU [3 (2,6) vs 2 (1,4), P < 0.001] length-of-stay, higher ICU (32.7% vs 8.4%, P < 0.001), hospital (71.9% vs 21.3%, P < 0.001), and one-year mortality (97.6% vs 54.7%, P < 0.001) compared with those considered appropriate. Performance status impairment, more severe organ dysfunctions at admission, metastatic disease, and source of ICU admission were the characteristics associated with intensivist's perception of inappropriateness of ICU admission. ConclusionsThese findings may help guide ICU admission policies and triage criteria for end-of-life discussions among hospitalized patients with cancer.

What is fair? Ethical analysis of triage criteria and disability rights during the COVID-19 pandemic and the German legislation

This essay discusses the ethical challenges and dilemmas in allocating scarce medical resources during the COVID-19 pandemic, using the German legislative process as a starting point. It is guided by...

Cribari, does it apply in real time? An analysis of a community level 1 trauma center

BackgroundMajor Trauma Code 1 (TC1) activations require significant resources to provide immediate treatment to potentially unstable, critically ill, patients. The Cribari Matrix Method (CMM) and Need For Trauma Intervention (NFTI) are two ways to determine over and undertriage in trauma. We studied the overtriage rate at a community level 1 trauma center using these two methods to determine the efficacy of the triage criteria in TC1 activations. MethodA retrospective review of all patients in the trauma registry of a level 1 American College of Surgeons trauma program from May to October 2021 was performed. Overtriage rates were determined using CMM and NFTI criteria. ResultsThe overtriage rate of 552 activations using CMM alone was 73%. CMM combined with NFTI resulted in a 56% overtriage rate. ConclusionThe Cribari method can be used to determine the effectiveness of a system's trauma code 1 criteria but cannot delineate which criteria should be reviewed.

Outcomes of newly referred patients with suspected angle closure: do we need to redefine the clinical pathways?

To investigate outcomes of referrals for suspected angle closure and explore whether anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) can be used to tighten triaging criteria in a glaucoma virtual clinic. Retrospectively collected data. The first audit (04/2018-03/2019) identified referrals for suspected angle closure without other glaucoma-related findings (primary angle closure suspect (PACS) referrals). All patients underwent gonioscopy. The second audit (04-08/2019) identified patients with suspected angle closure in a virtual clinic. Management outcomes were assessed, using gonioscopy as reference standard. The outcomes of the second audit were re-audited after changing the triaging criterion from angle width <10° to iridotrabecular contact (ITC) in ≥1 quadrants on AS-OCT. Out of 1754 glaucoma referrals (first audit), 24.6% (431/1754) were PACS referrals. Of these, only 10.7% (42/393) had an occludable angle on gonioscopy, with 97.6% (41/42) being PACS. Of these, 78% (32/41) underwent laser peripheral iridotomy. Out of 137 referrals in the virtual clinic (second audit), 66.4% (91/137) were triaged to the face-to-face clinic. Of these, 31.9% (29/91) were discharged. AS-OCT had positive and negative predictive value of 74.3% (95% confidence intervals (CI) 57.8-86.0) and 82.1% (95% CI 70.0-90.2%), respectively, in detecting ITC in ≥1 quadrants. In the re-audit 45.9% (45/98) of those with suspected angle closure were triaged for gonioscopy, with 24.4% (11/45) of them being discharged. PACS referrals represent a substantial burden to hospital-based services and their accuracy is low. ITC in ≥1 quadrants on AS-OCT can be useful in triaging those who need further evaluation with gonioscopy.

Putting ICU triage guidelines into practice: A simulation study using observations and interviews.

The COVID-19 pandemic has prompted many countries to formulate guidelines on how to deal with a worst-case scenario in which the number of patients needing intensive care unit (ICU) care exceeds the number of available beds. This study aims to explore the experiences of triage teams when triaging fictitious patients with the Dutch triage guidelines. It provides an overview of the factors that influence decision-making when performing ICU triage with triage guidelines. Eight triage teams from four hospitals were given files of fictitious patients needing intensive care and instructed to triage these patients. Sessions were observed and audio-recorded. Four focus group interviews with triage team members were held to reflect on the sessions and the Dutch guidelines. The results were analyzed by inductive content analysis. The Dutch triage guidelines were the main basis for making triage decisions. However, some teams also allowed their own considerations (outside of the guidelines) to play a role when making triage decisions, for example to help avoid using non-medical criteria such as prioritization based on age group. Group processes also played a role in decision-making: triage choices can be influenced by the triagists' opinion on the guidelines and the carefulness with which they are applied. Intensivists, being most experienced in prognostication of critical illness, often had the most decisive role during triage sessions. Using the Dutch triage guidelines is feasible, but there were some inconsistencies in prioritization between teams that may be undesirable. ICU triage guideline writers should consider which aspects of their criteria might, when applied in practice, lead to inconsistencies or ethically questionable prioritization of patients. Practical training of triage team members in applying the guidelines, including explanation of the rationale underlying the triage criteria, might improve the willingness and ability of triage teams to follow the guidelines closely.

Telephone assessment of new hernia referrals-is it possible?

Utilisation of remote clinics is increasing in healthcare settings worldwide. During the height of the COVID pandemic, our UK-based teaching hospital has trialled telephone assessment for new patients presenting with primary hernias. Selected cases are listed for elective repair of primary hernia direct from telephone clinic assessment. In March 2021, after this process had been in place for 13months, departmental triage criteria were introduced, allocating patients to initial assessment in Face to Face or Telephone Clinics. Here, we evaluate the effectiveness of telephone assessment, with specific attention to 'Day of Surgery' cancellation. We also assess the effect of our triage criteria on rate of 'Day of Surgery' cancellation. Departmental diaries were studied retrospectively to identify patients listed for hernia repair between February 2020 and February 2022. Data were obtained from clinic letters, discharge paperwork and operating lists, as well as from management teams. Fishers Exact test was used to compare groups seen either face to face or remotely as well and pre- and post-intervention. 325 patients were listed for hernia repair, 56 after telephone assessment. 6 (11%) of those listed from telephone clinic were cancelled on the day of surgery, compared with 34 (13%) of those seen face to face. With triage criteria in place, listing from telephone clinic increased significantly from 14 to 27%. Overall day of surgery cancellations reduced from 13 to 9%. Rate of day of surgery cancellation in those assessed in telephone clinic reduced from 12 to 9%. There is no significant difference between day of surgery cancellations after face to face or telephone clinic assessment. Triage criteria for telephone assessment appear to increase the numbers being listed after remote clinics. This did not significantly impact the number of day of surgery cancellations.

Which Method of Transportation Is Associated With Better Outcomes for Patients With Firearm Injuries to the Head and Neck?

In firearm injuries (FI), rapid transportation is important for survival. Information regarding different methods of transportation for head and neck FI is limited. The purpose of the study was to measure the association between method of transportation and the need for tracheostomy and/or intensive care unit (ICU). This retrospective cross-sectional study reviewed patients in Trauma Registry at Grady Memorial Hospital (GMH) in Atlanta, Georgia, from January 2016 to June 2021. Patients ≥18years old who sustained FI to the head and neck and were transported via ground emergency medical services (GEMS) or helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) were included. Patients who arrived at the hospital by foot, private vehicle, or transported from a different hospital were excluded. The primary predictor variable was method of transportation (GEMS: ambulance transportation to GMH vs HEMS: helicopter transportation to GMH helipad). The primary outcome variables were tracheostomy (yes/no) and ICU admission (yes/no). Patient, injury, and hospital-related covariates were collected. Univariate analysis, χ2 test for categorical variables, and independent t test for continuous variables were calculated. Statistical significance was P<.05. Of total, 609 patients met the inclusion criteria. There were 560 patients (483 males) with a mean age of 33.6years old (range, 18 to 90) transported by GEMS. There were 49 patients (40 males) with a mean age of 44years old (range, 18 to 82) transported by HEMS. Patients transported by HEMS were statistically more likely to have longer transportation time in minutes [13.2 (range, 5 to 132) versus 24.2 (range, 9 to 46), P= <.001], lower Glasgow Coma Scale score [9.9 (range, 3 to 15) versus 6.3 (range, 3 to 15); P= <.001], higher Injury Severity Score [19.3 (range, 3.7 to 98) versus 24.2 (range, 10.3 to 98); P=.007], require transfusion [195 (34.8%); versus 26 (53.1%); P=.013], tracheostomy [46(8.2%) versus 13 (26.5%); P= <.001], and/or admitted to ICU [169, 30.2% versus 24 (49%); P=.007]. HEMS was positively associated with more tracheostomy and/or ICU admission. Additionally, patients transported by HEMS experienced longer transportation time and severe injuries. HEMS triage criteria specific for FI to the head and neck should be developed.

The Trauma Activation Review Committee: Response to Undertriage During a Period of Rapid Growth at a Level II Trauma Center.

Trauma triage criteria are constantly being refined for improved identification of severely injured patients. When errors occur, they should be tracked, and triage criteria adjusted to minimize these events. Two time periods of trauma registry data at a single rural level II trauma center were retrospectively compared to evaluate demographics, injuries, and outcomes to identify triage errors. In 300 activated trauma patients during 2011, overtriage was 23% and undertriage was 3.7%. In 1035 activated trauma patients during 2019, overtriage was 20.5% and undertriage was 2.2%. Mortality decreased over time overall. In 2019, Trauma I patients were older, spent more time on the ventilator, and in the ICU (all P < .001). Trauma II patients were also older, had lower ISS, hospital days, and ventilator days (all P < .001). During rapid growth, evaluation of overtriage and undertriage can provide useful feedback for hospital staff to refine triage choices and improve patient outcomes.

Using the HEART score in patients with chest pain in the emergency department of Kosovo as an important triage criterion for treatment and hospitalization.

Clinical information on 269 individuals with chest pain admitted to the Emergency Room was reviewed: January 2022 until January 2023. A prospective registry was used to record information about patients with nontraumatic chest discomfort who were admitted from the emergency department. Over a 12-month period, patients admitted in emergency department were classified through HEART score. From them 101 patients (37%) belong to the age group older than or equal to 65 years, 134 patients (50%) belong to the age group 45-65 years, and 34 patients (13%) belong to the age group younger than or equal to 45 years. Strong positive correlation between troponin level (HEART score) and hospitalization, also p value 0.043 is typically considered to be statistically significant. According to HEART score classification 43 cases (60%) from the group with 7-10 (high risk) were hospitalized. According to anamnesis (history) on cardiovascular disease in relation to hospitalization, then 48 cases hospitalized (67%) belong to the classification 1-moderately suspicious and 21 cases hospitalized (29%) belong to the classification 2-highly suspicious classification. The HEART score can be used for triage since it is a simple, rapid, and accurate predictor of outcome in patients with chest pain. A medium risk group included about half of the patients who reported chest pain to an emergency room. Hospitalization and troponin level had a strong positive link (HEART score), with a p value of 0.043.

Survival Benefit of Helicopter Scene Response for Patients with an Injury Severity Score of at Least Nine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background and Aim Helicopter EMS (HEMS) is a well-established mode of rapid transportation for patients with need for time-sensitive interventions, especially in patients with significant traumatic injuries. Traditionally in the setting of trauma, HEMS is often considered appropriate when used for patients with “severe” injury as defined by Injury Severity Score (ISS) >15. This may be overly conservative, and patients with a lower ISS may benefit from HEMS-associated speed or care quality. Our objective was to perform a meta-analysis of trauma HEMS transports to evaluate for possible mortality benefit in injured cases defined by an ISS score >8, lower than the customary ISS cutoff of >15. Methods A broad search of the literature was performed including PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar from the years 1970 to 2022. The gray literature and reference lists of included publications were also examined. We included studies with the outcome of mortality in HEMS vs control in trauma transports from scene of injury for patients (adult or pediatric) with ISS > 8. Results Nine eligible studies were used in the final analysis: six in the primary analysis and three in sensitivity analysis due to patient overlap. All studies reported statistically significant survival benefit in HEMS compared to control group. The minimum survival odds ratio (OR) benefit observed was OR 1.15 (95% CI 1.06–1.25) and maximum was OR 2.04 (95% CI 1.18–3.57). Risk of bias tool (ROBINS-I) application yielded moderate to low risk of bias, mainly due to the observational nature of the studies included. Conclusions There was a statistically significant survival benefit in patients with ISS > 8 when HEMS was used over traditional ground ambulance transportation, although novel and more inclusive trauma triage criteria may be more appropriate in the future to guide HEMS utilization decision-making. Restricting HEMS to trauma patients with ISS >15 likely misses survival benefit that could be afforded to the subset of trauma patients with serious injury.

What can we learn from experiences in general practice during the COVID-19 pandemic? A qualitative study

BackgroundExperiences with organizational changes in daytime general practices and out-of-hours (OOH) services during the COVID-19 pandemic may help to address the challenges in general practice care that were already a concern before the crisis. This study aimed to describe these experiences and the potential usefulness of the organizational changes for future general practice care and any future pandemics.MethodsSemi-structured interviews were performed among 11 directors of OOH services, and 19 (locum) general practitioners (GPs) or practice managers, who were purposively sampled. Video or telephone interviews were performed in two rounds: between November 2020 and January 2021 and between May 2021 and August 2021. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis methods.ResultsThree themes emerged from the data: (1) Changes in the triage procedures; in GP practices and OOH services, stricter triage criteria were implemented, and GPs were more actively involved in the triage process. These measures helped to reduce the number of ‘low urgency’ face-to-face consultations. (2) Changes in GP care; there was a shift towards video and telephone consultations, allowing GPs to spend more time with patients during the remaining face-to-face consultations. For chronic patients, the shift towards telemonitoring appeared to encourage self-care, and postponing face-to-face consultations for regular checkups appeared to be unproblematic for stable patients. (3) Coordination of GP care and information communication flow during the COVID-19 pandemic; OOH directors perceived a lack of consistency in the information from various governmental and non-governmental parties on containment measures and guidelines related to COVID-19, making it difficult to act on them. The COVID-19 pandemic intensified collaboration between GPs, OOH services, and other healthcare professionals.ConclusionsThe results of this study indicate that some of the organizational changes, such as stricter triage, remote consultations, and changes in managed care of chronic patients, may help in tackling the pre-existing challenges in GP care from before the COVID-19 pandemic. However, more extensive research and continuous monitoring are necessary to establish the effects on patients and their health outcomes. To navigate future pandemics, the intensified collaboration between health professionals should be maintained, while there is considerable room for improvement in the provision of unambiguous information.

Non-urgent patients in emergency departments: Prioritisation, orientation, and selection through the prism of social sciences

Emergency departments overcrowding is often attributed to inappropriate use by patients who ought to be treated in primary care. This article challenges this assertion by examining the articulation of medical and social definitions of non-urgent patients within medical and sociological literature, and how they translate into prioritisation, selection and triage criteria. It shows that triage practices, which are necessary for prioritising life-threatening emergencies are not only based on clinical criteria, but also incorporate moral and social considerations which can lead to discrimination and hinder equitable access to care, particularly for the most vulnerable patients.

Evaluation of Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter Measurement in the Management of Patients Admitted to the Emergency Department with Head Trauma

Objective: Ultrasonographic measurements of optic nerve sheath diameter is associated with increased intracranial pressure. Intracranial pressure measurements are usually performed on critical areas or intensive care unit patients. The effect of ultrasonographic measurement of optic nerve sheath diameter in predicting pathology or the need for surgery in mild or moderate head trauma has not been evaluated. In our study, we compared ultrasonographic optic nerve sheath diameter measurements with cranial computed tomography (CT) findings and clinical outcomes of patients with head trauma. Materials and methods: Patients with head trauma admitted to the emergency department who were diagnosed with mild, moderate, and severe brain injury were selected for this retrospective study. The optic nerve sheath diameters were measured by ultrasonography. The findings were compared with the outcome and cranial tomography characteristics of the patients. Results: Of the 58 patients admitted to the emergency department with head trauma, mild traumatic brain injury was most common. Hospitalization or operation was required in 51.7% of the patients (30 patients). The mean optic nerve sheath diameter was 4.96 ± 1.02 mm (3.1–7.3 mm) on the right and 4.92 ± 1.02 mm (3.3–7.8) on the left. Optic nerve sheath diameter of 5 mm or more were statistically significant in predicting hospitalization, the presence of pathology, and increased intracranial pressure on cranial CT (P &lt; 0.05). Conclusion: Optic nerve sheath diameters of patients with moderate and mild head trauma may provide information about the need for hospitalization or surgery and can be used as a triage criterion in determining the need for monitoring and follow-up and imaging priorities.