Objective The purpose of this research was to investigate patterns of observational learning implemented by team sport athletes, coaches, and officials. Method The Functions of Observational Learning Questionnaire (FOLQ; Cumming, Clark, Ste-Marie, McCullagh, & Hall, 2005) was administered to 240 participants (20 athletes, coaches, and officials from basketball, baseball, ice hockey and soccer respectively). Results Analysis of variance revealed that the skill function ( M = 5.33, SD = 1.16) was significantly highest across all participants, followed by the strategy ( M = 4.81, SD = 1.23), then performance functions ( M = 3.33, SD = 1.23). The results also indicated that coaches ( M = 5.62, SD = 0.90) scored significantly higher than athletes ( M = 5.16, SD = 1.27) and officials ( M = 5.20, SD = 1.23) on the skill function; coaches ( M = 5.15, SD = 1.13) ranked significantly higher than athletes ( M = 4.74, SD = 1.32) and officials ( M = 4.55, SD = 1.15) on the strategy function; and officials ( M = 3.61, SD = 1.20) scored significantly higher than coaches ( M = 3.05, SD = 1.23) on the performance function. Conclusions The pattern of observational learning for all participants was similar to previous findings. Individually, coaches scored highest on the skill and strategy functions, while officials scored highest on the performance function. The results are noteworthy as they provide the first comparison of athletes, coaches, and officials. Comparisons amongst these sport participants may lead to a better understanding of the learning process that occurs through observation for athletes, coaches, and officials.