You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 Apr 2023MP11-02 TREATMENT TRENDS IN PATIENTS WITH DE NOVO METASTATIC PROSTATE CANCER IN THE ERA OF UPFRONT COMBINATION THERAPY Sasaki Daichi, Miura Hikari, Hatakeyama Shingo, Tabata Ryuji, Fujimori Daiji, Kawashima Yohei, Moriyama Shingo, Oishi Takuya, Horiguchi Hirotaka, Soma Osamu, Noro Daisuke, Tanaka Toshikazu, Okamoto Teppei, Hashimoto Yasuhiro, and Ohyama Chikara Sasaki DaichiSasaki Daichi More articles by this author , Miura HikariMiura Hikari More articles by this author , Hatakeyama ShingoHatakeyama Shingo More articles by this author , Tabata RyujiTabata Ryuji More articles by this author , Fujimori DaijiFujimori Daiji More articles by this author , Kawashima YoheiKawashima Yohei More articles by this author , Moriyama ShingoMoriyama Shingo More articles by this author , Oishi TakuyaOishi Takuya More articles by this author , Horiguchi HirotakaHoriguchi Hirotaka More articles by this author , Soma OsamuSoma Osamu More articles by this author , Noro DaisukeNoro Daisuke More articles by this author , Tanaka ToshikazuTanaka Toshikazu More articles by this author , Okamoto TeppeiOkamoto Teppei More articles by this author , Hashimoto YasuhiroHashimoto Yasuhiro More articles by this author , and Ohyama ChikaraOhyama Chikara More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003226.02AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: To assess trends in treatment selection for patients with de novo metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer in the era of upfront combination therapy. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study included 595 patients treated with either upfront combination therapy (upfront novel hormonal therapies and taxane-based chemotherapy) or vintage therapy (androgen deprivation therapy with or without bicalutamide) between 2016 and 2021. High tumor burden metastatic disease was defined when a patient met the CHAARTED or LATITUDE criteria. We evaluated trends in treatment selection and reasons for selecting vintage therapy. RESULTS: Of the 595 included patients, 123 and 472 patients were classified as having low and high tumor burden disease, respectively. Use of upfront combination therapy was found to be rapidly increasing with utilization rates of 72% and 54% in 2021 for high and low tumor burden disease, respectively. Of the 163 patients who were offered upfront combination therapy, 74.2% selected vintage therapy. Reasons for selecting vintage therapy included refusal (39.8%), older age (67.6%), frailty (56.3%), and comorbidity (40.8%). Furthermore, 16.9% of patients declined upfront combination therapy due to cost concerns.Upfront combination therapy use has 72% and 54% prevalence among patients with high and low tumor burden diseases, respectively, in this current practice. CONCLUSIONS: Older age was the most common reason for declining upfront combination therapy. Source of Funding: no © 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 209Issue Supplement 4April 2023Page: e123 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Sasaki Daichi More articles by this author Miura Hikari More articles by this author Hatakeyama Shingo More articles by this author Tabata Ryuji More articles by this author Fujimori Daiji More articles by this author Kawashima Yohei More articles by this author Moriyama Shingo More articles by this author Oishi Takuya More articles by this author Horiguchi Hirotaka More articles by this author Soma Osamu More articles by this author Noro Daisuke More articles by this author Tanaka Toshikazu More articles by this author Okamoto Teppei More articles by this author Hashimoto Yasuhiro More articles by this author Ohyama Chikara More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...