AbstractObjectivesTo quantify the use of an adult emergency department (ED) by paediatric patients and identify the acuity and spectrum of these presentations.To determine the seniority and paediatric experience of emergency department staff involved with these patients.To address the appropriateness of the paediatric guidelines in an ‘adult only’ emergency department.SettingThe Royal Melbourne Hospital, an ‘adult only’ metropolitan tertiary hospital with 40,000 ED presentations annually and an admission rate of 30%.MethodsPaediatric (18 years and under) ED attendances were recorded retrospectively over 12 months. Prospective data were then gathered for two weeks on acuity, clinical data and disposition for each patient as well as seniority and extent of paediatric training of medical staff involved.ResultsPaediatric patients accounted for 3.9% of presentations in the retrospective study and 2.8% in the prospective study. In the younger age groups, paediatric patients were of higher acuity, with greater admission rates and less trauma than average, with opposite trends in adolescents. Amongst the adolescent group the rate of patients ‘who did not wait’ was double that of the general ED population. Most patients (74%) were managed by staff with no paediatric training. Australasian College for Emergency Medicine (ACEM) advanced trainees were the most confident in managing children.ConclusionsPaediatric patients do present to this ‘adult only’ ED. In this setting medical staff experience and training in paediatric management is variable. Suitable training and guidelines should be considered to address this issue. This study supports the ACEM requirement for paediatric training and has implications for emergency medicine paediatric training and Continuing Medical Education programs in the future. Multicentre studies, incorporating patient outcome data, would further clarify these issues.
Read full abstract