Treatment Of Ureteral Stones Research Articles

Impact of Anesthesia Type on Stone Clearance and Morbidity in Ureteroscopy: General Versus Spinal Anesthesia

Anaesthesiologists prefer regional anesthesia for ureterorenoscopy to prevent difficulties after the procedure, whereas surgeons prefer general anesthesia in order to prevent ureteral damage. However, limited comparative data exist regarding the outcomes of these anesthesia techniques in ureteroscopy-assisted stone clearance Objective: To compare spinal and general anesthesia regarding efficacy, safety, and patient outcomes during ureteroscopy for ureteric stones. Methods: This quasi-experimental study included 90 patients aged between 20-60 years in total were chosen. Using a semi-rigid ureteroscope (8/8.4 fr), all individuals had ureteroscopic treatment for ureteric stones. Equal numbers of 45 patients were divided between the two groups. General anesthesia was administered to Group A, and spinal anesthesia was provided to Group B. The participants' demographic data, hospital stays, operating times, stone removal rates, and intra- and post-operative problems were all recorded. Data on intraoperative parameters, stone clearance, and postoperative complications were collected and analysed using SPSS 23.0. Results: General anesthesia significantly reduced the dilatation time (104.01 ± 12.772 vs. 130.552 ± 22.532 sec, p < 0.001) and time to reach the stone (126.68 ± 12.592 vs. 137.602 ± 17.841 sec, p < 0.001) compared to spinal anesthesia. However, no significant differences were observed in lithotripsy time, operation time, stone-free rates, or postoperative complications between the two groups. Patients in the GA group reported higher VAS scores and an increased frequency of nausea/vomiting after surgery. Conclusion: General anesthesia reduced the time for dilatation and stone access but showed no significant advantages in lithotripsy time, operation time, stone-free rates, or complications.

Which combination of medical expulsive therapy is more effective for treatment of distal ureteral stone in adults? A systematic review and network meta-analysis

BackgroundMedical Expulsive Therapy (MET) has been recommended as an established modality for the treatment of distal ureteral stones due to its clearance rate, pain control, and patient satisfaction while having minimal morbidity in comparison to other urologic interventions. In some studies, a combination of medications has been used, which we assessed in this network meta-analysis (NMA).MethodsWe conducted systematic searches in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science to identify relevant trials published between 2001 and 2024. We excluded articles that looked at MET for upper ureteral stone passage or after shock wave lithotripsy (SWL). NMA was performed to compare the effect of combination MET on stone expulsion rate (SER), stone expulsion time (SET), and need for analgesia.ResultsWe included 19 studies with 2414 participants. NMA results revealed that the combination MET of α-blockers with PDE-5 inhibitors (OR = 2.7, CI = 1.80,4.05), corticosteroids (OR = 2.7, CI = 1.81,4.13), and phytotherapy (OR: 3.10, CI = 1.62,5.92) were more effective than α-blockers alone in SER. The combination MET of α-blockers with PDE-5 inhibitors (MD: -3.8, CI=-7.0, -0.5) showed significantly lower SET compared to α-blockers alone. Finally, combination MET of α-blockers with PDE-5 inhibitors (MD:1.0, CI = 0.4,1.7) and nifedipine with corticosteroids (MD:1.2, CI = 0.4,1.9) showed a significant decrease in analgesia use.ConclusionsThe combination MET of α-blockers with PDE-5 inhibitors, corticosteroids, and phytotherapy increases the rate of stone clearance 2.7 to 3.1 times more than α-blockers alone. The other benefits of combination MET were lower expulsion time and less analgesia use that needs further studies.

Flexible Vacuum-assisted Ureteral Access Sheath for Treating Impacted Ureteral Stones.

To evaluate the feasibility and safety of using the novel flexible vacuum-assisted ureteral access sheath (FV-UAS) in flexible ureteroscopy (F-URS) treatment of impacted non-distal ureteral stones. We analyzed data from patients who underwent FV-UAS treatment for impacted non-distal ureteral stones between January 2022 and September 2023. Perioperative parameters were evaluated, including operative time, ureteral injury, and complications. The FV-UAS have a 10 cm passive deflection segment at the distal end of the ureteral access sheath that can bend following the deflection of the F-URS, while also being connected to a vacuum device for aspiration. A total of 62 consecutive patients (35 females) were included. Mean (range) patient age was 50.0 (29-75) years. Mean (range) largest stone size was 13.8 (9-16) mm. Mean (range) total time was 34.2 (18-46) min. In 57 patients (91.9%), no residual stones were detected in the renal, while 5 patients (8.1%) had residual stones smaller than 4 mm. A 5-tier classification quantified ureteral injury severity at stone impaction sites: grade 0 (n=10); grade 1 (n=47); grade 2 (n=5); grade 3 and 4 (n=0). Nine patients (14.5%) underwent placement of two double-J stent. Two patients (3.2%) developed postoperative fever requiring antibiotics and conservative management. Mean (range) postoperative hospital stay was 1.2 (1-2) day. At the 3-month follow-up, no ureteral strictures had occurred. No additional surgical interventions were necessary during follow-up. The use of the FV-UAS for the treatment of impacted non-distal ureteral stones is a safe and effective surgical method.

The effectiveness and safety between prone position and supine position for ultrasound guided shock wave lithotripsy in proximal ureteral stones: a multi-center prospective propensity score-matching study.

Although shock wave lithotripsy(SWL)has been considered to be effective in treating ureteral stones, a definitive conclusion remains unclear on which patient's position is the optimal option for proximal ureteralstones. The purpose of this study is to assess the ideal position of ultrasound guided SWL for the treatment of proximal ureteral stones. This prospective study was conducted in multi-center from June 2020 to December 2023. Patients who underwent SWL in prone or supine position for proximal stones were enrolled in this study. The primary outcome was stone-free rate (SFR); the secondary outcome was complete SFR, sessions of SWL, and complications. Propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis was performed. Finally, 1187 patients with proximal ureteral stones were enrolled in this study; of which 50.5% (599) were treated with prone position and 49.5% (588) underwent supine position. After 1:1 PSM, the prone position group was superior in SFR (85.7% vs. 77.4%, P = 0.001), and complete SFR (83.3% vs. 75.0%, P = 0.001) compared with the supine potion group. The sessions of SWL (1.27 vs. 1.20, P = 0.092) and complications rate (all P values > 0.05) were comparable between the two groups. In addition, the prone group had shorter skin-to-stone distance (SSD) on ultrasound than the supine group (50mm vs. 101mm, P < 0.001). This multi-center prospective PSM study demonstrated that the prone position could increase the SFR and had comparable safety for ultrasound guided SWL among patients with proximal ureteral stones. Therefore, we advocate its priority application to patients with proximal ureteral stones when the prone position is possible.

Mini-endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (mini-ECIRS) for complex urolithiasis.

To miniaturize endourological procedures, mini-Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery (mini-ECIRS) has emerged as a promising alternative in the treatment of complex kidney and ureteral stones. To date, some data available in the literature have shown good outcomes regarding effectiveness and safety. This study aimed to evaluate the results and postoperative complications of mini-ECIRS in our series. A prospective analysis of consecutive patients who underwent mini-ECIRS at our center between June 2022 and March 2024 was performed. Demographic characteristics were collected, and the patients were divided according to de Guy's Stone Score (GSS). The stone-free rate (SFR) was classified into the grades according to non-contrast abdominal computed tomography 4 weeks after the procedure: Grade A (no stones), Grade B (< /= 2mm fragments), and Grade C (2.1-4mm fragments). 60 patients were included and enrolled in the study. The median stone volume was 3352 mm3 (2602-4573) and the median stone density was 1054 HU (774-1284). SFR Grade A was achieved in 48 patients (80%) and Grade C in 12 patients (20%). Thirteen patients (21.7%) presented Clavien-Dindo Grade I-II complications. When we divided the patients into two groups according to the GSS classification, GSS 1-3 presented significantly fewer postoperative complications and higher SFR. Mini-ECIRS is a safe and effective procedure for treating of complex renal and ureteral stones. Patients with GSS 4 are more likely to need a second look procedure and present a higher probability of postoperative complications. Larger and randomized studies are required to confirm these favorable outcomes.

For upper ureteral stone, semirigid ureteroscopy or flexible ureteroscopy? Strengths and weaknesses

BackgroundFlexible and semirigid ureteroscopy are two often used modalities in treating for upper ureteral stone. How about the outcome of each procedure?MethodsA retrospective cohort study among 167 patients who underwent flexible or semirigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy was performed. The pre-, intra-, postoperative and one-year follow-up outcomes were taken into comparison.ResultsSignificantly higher instant stone-clearance rate (81.3% vs. 92.4%, p = .032) and less operative time (62.1 ± 27.6 min vs. 44.1 ± 24.6 min, p<.001) were found in semirigid ureteroscopy. However, the stone-clearance rate at one month (90.7% vs. 93.5%, p = .500) was similar. Baseline characteristics including patient demographics, stone characteristics, duration of stone symptoms, hospital stay, expense, and complications between groups were approximately same. Three cases of stricture were found in the flexible ureteroscopy, and two in the semirigid ureteroscopy. Outcomes showed no significant difference. Further analysis showed that flexible ureteroscopy was likely more negatively affected by hydronephrosis and stone size, and semirigid ureteroscopy was more affected by stone location.Conclusionflexible ureteroscopy and semirigid ureteroscopy both had high stone clearance rate in the treatment for upper ureteral stones. They had similar outcomes and follow-up results. However, they also had their each most suitable application object.

Predictive factors of stone-free rate and complications in patients with proximal impacted ureteral stones undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy: based on a new scoring standard.

To evaluate the predictive factors affecting the stone-free rate (SFR) and complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCN) in the treatment of proximal impacted ureteral stones (PIUS) based on a new scoring standard. The data of 90 patients with PIUS were collected in this retrospective study between January 2015 and June 2023. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine factors affecting treatment outcome in terms of SFR and complications. The scoring standard for patients with PIUS was developed based on the univariate logistic regression analyses. In the univariate analysis, stone density (P = 0.015), and stone diameter (P = 0.032) significantly were associated with lower SFR. And degree of hydronephrosis (P = 0.014), Preoperative infection (P = 0.002), and history of lithotripsy (P = 0.045) were associated with occurrence of complications. Multivariate analysis indicated that stone density (P = 0.020), and stone diameter (P < 0.001) were associated with lower SFR; independent risk factors for development of complications were history of lithotripsy (P = 0.024), and preoperative infection (P < 0.001). Additionally, score ≥ 3 was the independent risk factor for both SFR (P < 0.001) and complication rate (P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis shown that there were statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of stone-free rate (P = 0.032) and complications (P = 0.015). According to the findings of this study, the stone score ≥ 3 was determined as a critical predictive factor of SFR and complications in PIUS patients undergoing PCN based on a new scoring standard. Additionally, PCN has high initial SFR and low complications when dealing with score < 3 PIUS.

Microchannel percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy for the treatment of 1-2cm high hardness single upper ureteral stones: a propensity score-matched study.

The objective of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of microchannel percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (MPCNL) with flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy (FURL) in the treatment of single upper ureteral stones with a diameter of 1-2cm and high hardness. This study retrospectively analyzed 89 patients diagnosed with a single upper ureteral stone with a 1-2cm diameter and a computed tomography value > 1000 Hounsfield units. A propensity score matching system matched this study with factors to minimize the effect of baseline differences between patients. Ultimately, 29 patients in each of the two groups were successfully matched. The stone-free rate was marginally higher in the MPCNL group than in the FURL group (93.10% vs. 86.21%), although the difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.666). Furthermore, the mean operative time in the MPCNL group, although slightly longer than that in the FURL group, did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference (P = 0.833). However, patients in the MPCNL group exhibited a significantly more substantial decrease in hemoglobin than those in the FURL group (P < 0.001) and a substantially more extended postoperative hospital stay (P < 0.001). Regarding perioperative complications, the incidence of moderate pain was higher in the MPCNL group than in the FURL group (P = 0.037). The difference in overall complication rates between the two groups did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.108). MPCNL and FURL are efficacious surgical procedures for treating single upper ureteral stones with a 1-2cm diameter and high hardness.

Comparison of Moses laser and Raykeen laser in patients with impacted upper ureteral stone undergoing flexible ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy

BackgroundTo compare the operative effect and clinical efficacy of the Moses laser mode and the Raykeen holmium laser energy platform powder mode under flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy in patients with impacted upper ureteral stones.MethodsFrom March 2022 to September 2022, 72 patients were divided into a Moses laser group and a Raykeen laser group according to surgical method, with 36 patients in each group. CT and ureteroscopy confirmed that all patients had isolated impacted upper ureteral stones. The stone volume (mm3), stone density (Hu) and severity of hydronephrosis were measured by CT. Postoperative complications were evaluated using the Clavien–Dindo score.ResultsThere were no complications of ureteral stenosis related to the laser treatment. The operative time and lithotripsy time were lower in the Moses laser group than in the Raykeen laser group (P < 0.05). The stone-free survival rate did not differ significantly between the two groups (P = 0.722). Stone volume was found to be positively correlated with laser energy and lithotripsy time in both groups (P < 0.01). There was no significant correlation between laser energy and lithotripsy time or ureteral stone density (Hu) in the Moses laser group (P > 0.05) or the Raykeen laser group (P > 0.05).ConclusionsThe contact mode of Moses technology and the powder mode of Raykeen laser lithotripsy can be used for the ablation of a single impacted upper ureteral stone. The ablation speed was related to the stone volume and the severity of polyp hyperplasia, not the stone density. We recommend the use of the powdered mode as a therapeutic measure for the treatment of impacted upper ureteral stones in flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy.

Efficacy of sexual stimulation in the treatment of distal ureteral stones: A meta-analysis

IntroductionThis study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of sexual stimulation with that of placebo in the treatment of distal ureteral stones. MethodsWe searched PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2022 for studies comparing the efficacy of sexual stimulus with that of placebo for the treatment of distal ureteral stones. RevMan 5.3 software was used to pool the data. The study protocol was registered on PROSPERO (Registration Number: CRD42023432408). ResultsA total of six randomized controlled trials comprising 535 cases of distal ureteral stones were included in this study. Among these, 273 cases were associated with sexual intercourse or masturbation 3–4 times a week, while 262 cases only received symptomatic treatment. The pooled results showed that the 2-week [risk ratios (RR) = 1.77, 95 % confidence interval (CI): 1.34, 2.33] and 4-week [RR = 1.48, 95 % CI: 1.29, 1.69] ureteral stone expulsion rates of the sexually stimulated group were significantly higher than those of the placebo group (ps < 0.01). Additionally, sexual stimulation was associated with a shorter ureteral stone expulsion time [weighted mean differences (WMD) = −3.74, 95 % CI: −6.27, −1.22, p < 0.01] and a decreased prevalence of renal colic attacks [WMD = −0.61, 95 % CI: −1.01, −0.22, p < 0.01] compared with those of the placebo group. ConclusionAppropriate sexual stimulation can enhance the spontaneous expulsion of distal ureteral stones in patients presenting with tolerable pain.

Applying urinary ultrasound to predict the risk of spontaneous ureteral stone passage: a retrospective cohort study

BackgroundTo assess the value of urological ultrasound in predicting the risk of spontaneous passage of ureteral stones.MethodsClinical and ultrasound data were collected consecutively from patients receiving conservative treatment for ureteral stones, and the outcome of spontaneous passage was followed up for 1 month. Ultrasound variables independently associated with the risk of spontaneous stone passage were screened. A logistic regression prediction model was constructed based on the independent risk factors, and the discriminative efficacy and clinical utility of the prediction model in inferring the risk of spontaneous passing were assessed by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve and clinical decision curve.ResultsA total of 163 patients undergoing conservative treatment for ureteral stones were included in the study, with a mean age of 45.95 ± 13.01 years. Among them, 47 cases (28.83%) experienced failure of spontaneous stone passage. Multivariable analysis revealed that stone length (OR: 2.622, P = 0.027), distal stone location (OR: 0.219, P = 0.003), and ureteral jetting frequency (OR: 6.541, P < 0.001) were independent risk factors for spontaneous stone passage. A prediction model incorporating stone length, stone location, and affected ureteral jetting frequency was developed to assess the risk of spontaneous stone passage. The area under the ROC curve was 0.814 (95% CI: 0.747–0.882), indicating good discriminatory power. The prediction model also demonstrated favorable net clinical benefit.ConclusionA prediction model based on ultrasound-derived stone length, location, and ureteral jetting frequency can accurately evaluate the risk of spontaneous stone passage in patients with ureteral stones, providing a basis for optimizing the clinical decision-making on ureteral stones, and has reliable clinical application value.

Ureteroscopy vs laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for large proximal ureteric stone: a randomised trial.

To compare the outcomes of retrograde flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) with retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy (RLU) for large proximal ureteric stones. A prospective randomised trial was conducted from January 2018 through December 2022 including patients with impacted proximal ureteric stones of 15-25 mm. Patients underwent fURS or RLU. Primary outcome was the stone-free rate. Demographic data, stone features, and complications rates were also compared between groups. A total of 64 patients were enrolled, 32 in each group. The mean impacted stone time was similar between groups, as well as stone size (17 mm) and stone density (>1000 Hounsfield Units). The ureteric stone-free rates between the two groups (93.7% in fURS vs 96.8% in RLU; odds ratio [OR] 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.72 to 3.17; P = 0.554), and overall success rates, which take into account residual fragments in the kidney (84.3% in fURS vs 93.7% in RLU; OR 1.02, 95% CI -0.69 to 2.74; P = 0.23), were similar. Operative time was also not statistically significantly different between groups (median 80 vs 82 min; P = 0.101). There was no difference in hospital length of stay. Retropulsion rate was higher with fURS (65.6% vs 3.1%; p < 0.001). Residual hydronephrosis (34.3% each group) and complication rates did no differ according to treatment. Flexible URS and RLU are both highly efficient and present low morbidity for large impacted proximal ureteric stone treatment. RLU is not superior to fURS.

Using ensemble learning and hierarchical strategy to predict the outcomes of ESWL for upper ureteral stone treatment

Urinary tract stones are a common and frequently recurring medical issue. Accurately predicting the success rate after surgery can help avoid ineffective medical procedures and reduce unnecessary healthcare costs. This study collected data from patients with upper ureter stones who underwent extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, including cases of successful as well as unsuccessful stone removal after the first and second lithotripsy procedures, and constructed prediction systems for the outcomes of the first and second lithotripsy procedures. Features were extracted from three categories of information: patient characteristics, stone characteristics, and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy machine data, and additional features were created using Feature Creation. Finally, the impact of features on the models was analyzed using six methods to calculate feature importance. Our prediction model for the first lithotripsy, selected from among 43 methods and seven ensemble learning techniques, achieves an AUC of 0.91. For the second lithotripsy, the AUC reaches 0.76. The results indicate that the detailed and binary information provided by patients regarding their history of stone experiences contributes differently to the predictive accuracy of the first and second lithotripsy procedures. The prediction tool is available at https://predictor.isu.edu.tw/ks.

Tip bendable suction ureteral access sheath versus traditional sheath in retrograde intrarenal stone surgery: an international multicentre, randomized, parallel group, superiority study

Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) is the main treatments for upper urinary tract stones. The Ureteral Access Sheath (UAS) serves as a supplementary tool, facilitating direct kidney access during RIRS. High quality of evidence comparing tip bendable suction ureteral access sheath (S-UAS) with traditional UAS in RIRS for the treatment of renal and ureteral stones is lacking. The purpose of the study is to compare the efficacy and safety of S-UAS with traditional UAS in RIRS for the treatment of renal or ureteral stones ≤30mm. An international, multicenter, and superiority randomized controlled trial included 320 intention-to-treat patients across 8 medical centers in China, the Philippines, Malaysia and Turkey from August 2023 to February 2024. The inclusion criteria were patients ≥18 years old with renal or ureteral stones ≤30mm. RIRS was performed using either S-UAS or traditional UAS. The primary outcome was the immediately stone-free rate (SFR). Secondary outcomes included SFR 3 months after operation, operating time, hospital stay, auxiliary procedures, complications (using the Clavien-Dindo grading system), and improvement in the Quality of Life (QoL) score. Differences between proportions [risk difference (RD)]/means [mean difference (MD)] and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were presented. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05952635. The S-UAS group demonstrated a significantly higher immediately SFR (81.3% versus 49.4%; RD 31.9%; 95% CI 22.5%-41.7%; p=0.004) compared to the traditional UAS group, as determined by the one-side superiority test. Additionally, the S-UAS group exhibited a higher SFR at 3 months post-operation (87.5% versus 70.0%; RD 17.5%; 95% CI 8.7%-26.3%; p<0.001), lower postoperative fever rate (RD-11.9%; 95% CI-18.7% to-4.9%; p<0.001), reduced use of stone baskets (RD-70.6%; 95% CI-77.8% to-63.5%; p<0.001), and better QoL improvement (MD 7.25; 95% CI 2.21-12.29; p=0.005). No statistically significant differences were observed in operation time, hospital stay, or the need for second-stage RIRS. In RIRS for upper urinary tract stones ≤30mm, S-UAS exhibited superior performance compared to traditional UAS, demonstrating higher SFR, reduced postoperative fever rate, and improved QoL outcomes. S-UAS emerges as a prudent and advantageous alternative to traditional UAS for RIRS. National Natural Science Foundation of China and Guangdong Province, and Zhejiang Medicine and Health Program.

Flexible Ureteroscopy versus Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy in the Management of upper Ureteric Stones Measuring from One to Two Centimeters: Randomized Prospective Study

Abstract Objective This prospective study aims to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of flexible ureteroscopy versus laparoscopic ureterolithotomy in the management of upper ureteric stones measuring from one to two centimeters. Methods his randomized-prospective study was conducted on 64 patients admitted from Urology unit, Ain Shams University in the period from October 2020 till September 2022; only 56 patients were analyzed statistically and 8 patients were excluded due to shortage in post- operative data and follow up. Patients were divided into two groups Group A consists of 31 patients and Group B consists of 25 patients with matched age, gender and body mass index (BMI). Results In our study, The VAS score at 6 hours post-operative and day 1 post-operative was found to be 5.32 and 2.71 in FURS group and was found to be 7.28 and 3.28 in RPLU group respectively showing significant difference with (p- value &amp;lt;0.001 and 0.016 respectively) between the two groups with more satisfaction in FURS group mostly due to the absence of trocars incisions. The complications were classified according to modified Clavien classification system. No major complications such as septic shock or death were reported in either treatment groups. As regards the recovery to work in postoperative and follow up periods in the present study, there was a significant difference between both groups with (P-value &amp;lt;0.001), as we found that it takes about 4.56 ± 0.82 days in RPLU group and 3.06 ± 1.91 days in FURS group to return daily routine activities. As regards the stone free rate in follow up periods in the present study, there was a significant difference between both groups with (P-value 0,02), as we found that it was 100% and 80,6% in RPLU and FURS group respectively. Our success rate in RPLU group was found to be 100% in comparison to Irfan Nazir Mir et al which was 93.4% (28/30) with two patients (2/30) converted to open ureterolithotomy, either due to technical snag or due to difficulty in localizing the ureter laparoscopically. Conclusion Both F-URS and RTLU were safe and effective surgical procedures for treatment of large proximal ureteral stones. However, RTLU had a higher stone-free rate with comparable operating time and complication rate as compared to F-URS. Also as regards to postoperative pain, shorter hospital stay and faster return to daily activities, both have almost similar results.

Comparison Between Retrograde and Antegrade Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy for the Management of Medium-Sized Proximal Ureteral Stones: A Randomized Prospective Study.

This study aimed to present the outcomes of retrograde and antegrade ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy in the treatment of proximal ureteral stones ranging in size from 10 to 20 millimeters in diameter. From March 2023 to December 2023, 70 patients were included in this prospective randomized double-arm interventional study. Patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (35 patients) had semi-rigid retrograde ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy, and Group 2 (35 patients) had semi-rigid antegrade ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy. In terms of length of hospitalization, there was a statistically significant distinction between the groups that were evaluated (p = 0.001). Group (1) showed a statistically significant distinction in Hb and HCT levels before and after the procedure (p < 0.05), whereas Group (2) showed a similar difference in Hb, creatinine, and HCT levels before and after the operation (p < 0.05). The antegrade group had much more hemorrhage than the retrograde group. Reduced hemoglobin (p = 0.008) and hemoglobin saturation (p = 0.029) were most noticeable in the antegrade group. Regarding stone-free rates (SFRs), no statistically significant difference was noted between the groups (p = 0.643). Both retrograde and antegrade ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy are dependable and successful for the treatment of proximal ureteral stones. For medium-sized proximal ureteral stones (10-20 mm), retrograde ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy may be the first option due to its shorter hospital stays, decreased bleeding rates, blood transfusion needs, and temporary rise in serum creatinine.

PGE2 binding to EP2 promotes ureteral stone expulsion by relaxing ureter via the cAMP-PKA pathway

BackgroundThis study investigated the relaxation effect of PGE2 on the ureter and its role in promoting calculi expulsion following calculi development.MethodsBy using immunofluorescence and Western blot, we were able to locate EP receptors in the ureter. In vitro experiments assessed the impact of PGE2, receptor antagonists, and agonists on ureteral relaxation rate. We constructed a model of ureteral calculi with flowable resin and collected ureteral tissue from postoperative side of the ureter after obstruction surgery. Western blot analysis was used to determine the protein expression levels of EP receptors and the PGE2 terminal synthase mPGES-1. Additionally, PGE2 was added to smooth muscle cells to observe downstream cAMP and PKA changes.ResultsThe expression of EP2 and EP4 proteins in ureteral smooth muscle was verified by Western blot analysis. According to immunofluorescence, EP2 was primarily found on the cell membrane, while EP4 was found in the nucleus. In vitro, PGE2 induced concentration-dependent ureteral relaxation. Maximum diastolic rate was 70.94 ± 4.57% at a concentration of 30µM. EP2 antagonists hindered this effect, while EP4 antagonists did not. Obstructed ureters exhibited elevated mPGES-1 and EP2 protein expression (P < 0.01). Smooth muscle cells treated with PGE2 displayed increased cAMP and phosphorylated PKA.ConclusionsPGE2 binding to EP2 induces ureteral relaxation through the cAMP-PKA pathway. This will provide a new theoretical basis for the development of new therapeutic approaches for the use of PGE2 in the treatment of ureteral stones.

Analysis and Modelling of the Predictive Value of PCT, PLR and NLR for Ureteric Sepsis after Ureteral Stone Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

This study aimed to analyse the value of procalcitonin (PCT), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in predicting postoperative ureteral stone complications of urogenic sepsis. The production of a clinical prediction model could provide additional direction to reduce the likelihood of postoperative urogenital sepsis. The clinical data of 520 patients with ureteral stones who underwent surgical treatment from January 2022, to September 2023, in the hospital were retrospectively analysed. The patients were divided into urogenic sepsis group (n = 42) and non-urogenic sepsis group (n = 478) in accordance with the occurrence of urogenic sepsis in the postoperative period. The peripheral blood PCT, PLR and NLR levels were collected within 24 h postoperatively in the two groups. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was employed to evaluate the predictive value of PCT, PLR and NLR levels for postoperative urogenital sepsis in patients with ureteral stones. Logistic regression analysis showed that PCT (odds ratio (OR) = 4.25, 95% CI: 1.85-9.78), PLR (OR = 4.00, 95% CI: 1.78-9.05) and NLR (OR = 2.29, 95% CI: 1.05-5.01) were risk factors for postoperative complication sepsis in patients with ureteral stones (p < 0.05). The ROC curves showed that the areas under the curve of PCT, PLR and NLR levels alone and in combination for predicting urogenic sepsis complications after emergency ureteral stone surgery were 0.683, 0.692, 0.611 and 0.799, respectively. Urogenic sepsis leads to increased serum PCT, NLR and PLR levels in patients undergoing surgical treatment for ureteral stones. Physicians should pay close attention to these indices to provide further theoretical support for reducing postoperative urogenic sepsis.

Prospective Evaluation of Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy in Renal and Upper Ureteric Stone Treatment: Clinical Assessment and Results.

Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) is a widely accepted non-invasive treatment for renal and upper ureteric stones smaller than 2 cm due to its safety and efficacy. Despite advancements in minimally invasive techniques, extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy remains an important modality. This prospective observational study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of ESWLin managing renal and upper ureteric stones measuring less than 2 cm in terms of stone clearance. In a study conducted at a university-affiliated tertiary care hospital, 119 patients with renal and upper ureteric stones underwent extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy over a 12-month period. Data on patient demographics, stone characteristics, treatment procedures, and complications were collected. Follow-up assessments were performed at two-week intervals for up to two months post-treatment. The mean age of patients was 39.78 years, with a mean stone size of 1.2 cm. Right kidney stones were more prevalent (61.3% [n=76]). Complications included fever (19.3% [n=23]), gross haematuria (24.3% [n=29]), and steinstrasse (21.8% [n=26]). The success rate of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy was 81.5% (n=97), with 18.5% (n=22) of patients requiring surgical intervention due to incomplete fragmentation or residual fragments >4 mm. Stone size and density played significant roles in treatment success. Despite advancements in minimally invasive techniques, ESWLretains its significance as a noninvasive and effective treatment option for renal and upper ureteric stones smaller than 2 cm. Its success depends on various factors, including the stone site, size, and composition. ESWL offers advantages such as minimal morbidity, shorter hospital stays, and better patient compliance. Complications such as steinstrasse are manageable with conservative measures or ancillary procedures. While ESWL may be losing ground in some cases, its noninvasive nature and favourable outcomes make it a valuable option in the armamentarium for stone management.

Is Open Ureterolithotomy Finished? : A Case of Giant Ureteral Stone and Screening of the Literature

INTRODUCTION: Open surgery is an old method of urology in the treatment of ureteral stones. With the development of new technologies; Indications for open surgery in the treatment of stone disease have decreased to 1-5.4 %. In this case, we aimed to remove 4 stones with a diameter of 22 mm at the lower end of the left ureter by open ureterolithotomy and to report similar cases in the literature. CASE: In the direct urinary system X-ray and abdominal computed tomography of the patient who applied to us with the complaint of left flank pain, 4 stones with a diameter of 22 mm in the lower end of the left ureter, grade 4 hydroureteronephrosis in the left ureter and kidney were observed. Left open ureterolithotomy was planned. The patient's stones were removed using the left Gibson incision technique, and the ureteral incision area was sutured by placing a 6f double j catheter into the ureter. A drain was placed in the left ureteral tracing and the procedure was terminated by suturing the Gibson incision. The patient's foley catheter was removed on the 1st day and the drain was removed on the 2nd day, and he was discharged. No postoperative complications were encountered. Six weeks later, the patient's 6f double j catheter was removed and the surgical procedure was completed. DISCUSSION: Ureteral stones usually form in the primary kidney and then descend into the ureter. Ureteral stones usually pass spontaneously, but stones larger than 1 cm have fewer spontaneous passages. Ureteral stones are usually single and smaller than 2 cm. For stones larger than 5 cm, the term giant ureteral stone is used. Paik et al. reported a mean blood loss of 144 cc and a mean hospital stay of 6.5 days in seven patients with open ureterolithotomy. All patients in the series were stone-free and had no complications. In another study, open ureterolithotomy was performed in 56 patients, and 46.4% of the patients had stones in the distalureter. While the hospital stay was 4.2 days, no complications were encountered. CONCLUSION: Open ureterolithotomy has lost its status as the gold standard with the development of ureterorenoscopy, but as in our case, it is a surgical technique that should be considered in large ureteral stones.