Treatment-related Adverse Events Research Articles

Toripalimab in combination with HBM4003, an anti-CTLA-4 heavy chain-only antibody, in advanced melanoma and other solid tumors: an open-label phase I trial

BackgroundHBM4003 is a novel anti-CTLA-4 heavy chain-only antibody, designed to enhance Treg ablation and antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity while ensuring a manageable safety profile. This phase I trial investigated the safety,...

Neoadjuvant toripalimab plus axitinib for clear cell renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava tumor thrombus: NEOTAX, a phase 2 study

The potential benefit of neoadjuvant toripalimab plus axitinib in cases with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) and inferior vena cava tumor thrombus (IVC-TT) remains unclear. NEOTAX was a phase 2 study to investigate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant toripalimab plus axitinib in patients with ccRCC and IVC-TT (ChiCTR2000030405). The primary endpoint was the down-staging rate of IVC-TT level. Secondary endpoints included change in TT length, response rate, percentage change in surgical approach, surgical morbidity, progression-free survival (PFS), safety, and biomarker analyses. In all, 25 patients received study treatment, 44.0% (11/25) patients had a reduction in thrombus level, and none experienced an increase in Mayo level. The median change in tumor thrombus length was −2.3 cm (range: −7.1 to 1.1 cm). Overall, 61.9% (13/21) patients experienced changes in surgical strategy compared with planned surgery, three patients experienced major complications. The median PFS was 25.3 months (95% CI: 17.0-NE). The 1-year PFS was 89.1% (95% CI: 62.7–97.2). No any of grade 4 or 5 treatment-related adverse event was identified. Biopsy samples of non-responders exhibited increased T cytotoxic cell infiltration, but these cells were predominantly PD-1 positive. Biopsy samples of responders exhibited lower T helper cells, however, their subtype, regulatory T cells remained unchanged. In surgical samples of the TT, non-responders exhibited increased CD8T_01_GZMK_CXCR4 subset T cells. NEOTAX met preset endpoints proving that toripalimab in combination with axitinib downstages IVC-TT in a significant proportion of patients leading to simplification in the procedure of surgery.

Longitudinal assessment of health-related quality of life in Japanese patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma receiving immune check point inhibitors

Real-world data on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are limited. This study included 42 patients with aUC who received second-line or later pembrolizumab (n = 19), maintenance avelumab followed by first-line chemotherapy (n = 13), or adjuvant nivolumab after radical surgery (n = 10). Time-course changes in the domains and scales related to HRQoL were evaluated using the EORTC QLQ-C30, FACT-G, and SF-8 questionnaires during ICI therapy. Anchor-based approaches for minimally important differences were determined as ‘improved’, ‘stable’, and ‘deteriorated’. We found significant improvements after the start of pembrolizumab treatment on many scales. Almost none of the scales changed significantly in the avelumab and nivolumab groups. Approximately 80% of the pembrolizumab group had deteriorated social/family well-being in FACT-G. Approximately 60% of the patients in the avelumab group had deteriorated general health and vitality in SF-8. In the nivolumab group, none of the scales deteriorated in > 50% of the patients. Deterioration of physical function in the SF-8 was associated with occurrence of treatment-related adverse events ≥ grade 2 during ICI therapy (P = 0.013). Our findings demonstrated that majority of patients with aUC who received ICI therapy had a stable HRQoL, which was consistent with evidence from clinical trials.

Safety and efficacy of electro-thumbtack needle for acute mountain sickness patients: a protocol of a randomized, single-blinded, and placebo-controlled study

BackgroundAcute mountain sickness (AMS) is considered the most common altitude sickness. It can be detrimental to the health of tourists who rapidly ascend high mountains, and can also impair the performance of individuals who move to the plateau for work or education. Acupuncture has been shown to improve AMS as a simple, safe, and effective nonpharmacological method, in case electro-thumbtack needle (ETN) is a more convenient form of acupuncture for both doctor and patient. There are no studies validating the effectiveness of electro-thumbtack needle in improving symptoms in participants with AMS. In this study, we will conduct a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of electro-thumbtack needle in participants with AMS. Our hypothesis is that electro-thumbtack needle is safe and effective in treating participants with AMS.MethodsThis study is a single-center, randomized, single-blinded, and placebo-controlled study involving at least 114 participants who were diagnosed with AMS. The participants randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the electro-thumbtack needle group and the sham acupuncture group. The treatment protocol involved stimulation of seven predefined acupuncture points, including Zhong Wan (RN12), bilateral Nei Guan (PC6), bilateral He Gu (LI4), and bilateral Tai Yang (EX-HN5), for approximately one minute each, with continuous application over 48 h. The primary outcome was improvement in 2018 Lake Louise score (LLS) after 48 h of treatment. Secondary outcome indicators included the incidence of participants with moderate-to-severe AMS (AMS > 5)and AMS, the LLS, visual analogue scale of headache, clinical functioning scores, the Groningen Sleep Quality Survey, the Stanford Somnolence Scale, blood pressure, oxygen saturation, and heart rate, in addition to treatment-related adverse events were also captured.DiscussionThis trial aims to ascertain the therapeutic benefits of ETN in mitigating AMS symptoms, thereby contributing to the evidence base for traditional medical practices, particularly acupuncture, in high-altitude medicine.Trial registrationChinese Clinical Trials Registry: ChiCTR2300073882. Registered on 24 July 2023.

Interleukin-1 blockade with RPH-104 (goflikicept) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI): secondary endpoints from an international, double blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase IIa study.

In a randomized double-blinded clinical trial of patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), goflikicept, an Interleukin-1 (IL-1) blocker, significantly reduced systemic inflammation, measured as the area-under-the-curve (AUC) for high-sensitivity C reactive protein (hsCRP) at 14 days. We report secondary analyses of biomarkers at 28 days, and cardiac function and clinical endpoints at 1 year. Patients received a single administration of goflikicept 80 mg (n=34), goflikicept 160 mg (n=34), or placebo (n=34). Both doses of goflikicept significantly reduced the AUC for hsCRP at 28 days compared with placebo, without statistically significant differences between the doses. There we no statistically significant differences between groups in the AUC for natriuretic peptides at 28 days. There were no significant differences between placebo, goflikicept 80 mg and 160 mg groups in deaths (2.9%, 2.9% and 0%), hospitalization for cardiovascular reasons (9.1%, 5.9%, and 0%), new-onset or progression of heart failure (9.1%, 5.9%, and 5.9%), and new or increased use of loop diuretics (24.2%, 14.7%, and 17.6%), nor in the number of patients with treatment emergent adverse events, with no treatment-related serious adverse events in any group. In conclusion, in patients with STEMI, IL-1 blockade with goflikicept 80 mg or 160 mg was well tolerated and associated with significant reduction of systemic inflammation. Further adequately powered studies are warranted to determine whether the reduction in systemic inflammation with goflikicept translates into a clinical benefit in patients with STEMI.

Preclinical investigations and a first-in-human phase 1a trial of JS007, a novel anti-CTLA-4 antibody, in patients with advanced solid tumors

Abstract Background Blocking cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4) shows substantial antitumor efficacy. Here, we report the preclinical data and outcomes of a first-in-human phase 1a trial of JS007, a novel anti-CTLA-4 antibody, in advanced solid tumors. Methods In preclinical studies, both in vitro characteristics and in vivo characteristics of JS007 were investigated. The clinical trial included a dose escalation phase and a dose expansion phase. Eligible patients with previously treated advanced solid tumors were enrolled. In the dose escalation phase, JS007 was administered intravenously every 3 weeks at doses of 0.03, 0.3, 1, 3, and 10 mg/kg. Then, 3 and 10 mg/kg were chosen for the dose expansion phase. The primary endpoints included the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of JS007 based on dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and safety. Results JS007 could effectively bind to CTLA-4 and induce an immune response in vitro. Potent in vivo antitumor activity of JS007 was observed. Increased T cell infiltration and T regulatory (Treg) cell depletion in tumor microenvironment of cancer cell xenografts were detected after treated with JS007. Pharmacological analysis in experimental animals showed a dose-proportional increase in exposure. In the clinical trial, a total of 28 patients were treated with JS007 across 5 dose levels. No DLTs occurred. The MTD did not reach at the highest dose tested (10 mg/kg). Twenty-three (82.1%) patients experienced at least one treatment-related adverse event (TRAE). The incidence of Grade ≥ 3 TRAEs was 28.6% (8/28) with alanine aminotransferase increase (7.1%, 2/28) being the most frequently reported TRAE. No severe immune-related adverse event (irAE) occurred. Pharmacological profiles of JS007 in patients were similar to those in animal models. Serum concentration of JS007 showed a dose-dependent escalation, and the half-life of JS007 was 9.4 ~ 12.2 days. Treatment-induced anti-drug antibody was detected in 2 patients. The disease control rate was 50% (14/28), and the median overall survival was 14.7 months. Conclusions JS007 preliminarily demonstrates good tolerance and encouraging antitumor activity in patients with previously treated advanced solid tumors. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05049265 (Sep 20, 2021).

Real-World Outcomes of Patients With Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Receiving a Combination of Ipilimumab and Nivolumab as First- or Later-Line Treatment

ObjectivesOn the basis of the positive results of CheckMate-743, first-line (1L) treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) with the combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab (ipi/nivo) has become a standard-of-care. Furthermore, patients who received 1L platinum/pemetrexed chemotherapy are often considered for second or further-line (2L+) ipi/nivo on the basis of MAPS2 results. Here we report on real-world survival and safety outcomes of ipi/nivo for patients with MPM in Switzerland. MethodsTwelve cancer centers contributed data to this retrospective cohort. Baseline characteristics including age, sex, histology, programmed death-ligand 1 expression, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS), and previous/subsequent therapies were collected. The efficacy and safety outcomes were assessed by local investigators. ResultsOf the 109 patients with MPM treated with ipi/nivo between November 2017 and March 2023 (median follow-up of 16.6 months) 75% had epithelioid, 9% biphasic, and 16% sarcomatoid histology. The median age was 72 years; 91% were males, and 83% had an ECOG PS of 0 to 1. Ipilimumab in combination with nivolumab was given as 1L in 43% and as 2L+ treatment in 57% of patients. The objective response rate was 21% in 1L and 15% in 2L+. Median progression-free survival was 6.5 and 2.8 months, respectively. Median overall survival (OS) from the start of ipi/nivo was 12.6 months for 1L and 6.9 months for 2L+. No differences in OS were observed depending on age and programmed death-ligand 1 expression. Nevertheless, the median OS was significantly worse in patients with an ECOG PS of 2 or higher than those with an ECOG PS of 0 to 1 (2.4 versus 11.9 months, p < 0.001). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of any grade related to ipi/nivo treatment occurred in 65 patients (62%). The highest-grade TRAE was 1 to 2 in 58% of these patients and 3 or higher in 42% Treatment discontinuation due to a TRAE occurred in 22% of patients. ConclusionIn this real-world cohort of patients with MPM treated with ipi/nivo survival outcomes were inferior to those reported in the CheckMate-743 and MAPS2 trials, whereas safety outcomes were similar.

Perioperative chemotherapy and nivolumab in non-small-cell lung cancer (NADIM): 5-year clinical outcomes from a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial

Perioperative immunotherapy improves short-term outcomes in resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We now report 5-year survival from the NADIM trial to assess its long-term benefit. NADIM was a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial conducted across 18 hospitals in Spain. Patients were aged 18 years or older, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, and had histologically or cytologically confirmed, treatment-naive, resectable stage IIIA NSCLC (American Joint Committee on Cancer, 7th edition criteria). The neoadjuvant treatment consisted of three cycles of intravenous paclitaxel (200 mg/m2) and carboplatin (area under the curve 6 mg/mL per min) with nivolumab (360 mg). After surgery, 1 year of adjuvant treatment with intravenous nivolumab monotherapy was administered (240 mg every 2 weeks for 4 months, followed by 480 mg every 4 weeks for 8 months). The primary endpoint was 24-month progression-free survival, with 5-year progression-free survival and overall survival as secondary endpoints, assessed in the intention-to-treat population (ie, all patients who received neoadjuvant treatment). Toxicity profile was also assessed as a secondary endpoint. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03081689) and is complete; this is the final report of the trial. Between April 26, 2017, and Aug 25, 2018, 51 patients were assessed for eligibility, of whom 46 comprised the intention-to-treat population (34 [74%] male and 12 [26%] female, median age 63 years [IQR 58-70]). Follow-up was concluded at 60 months (data cutoff July 11, 2023; median follow-up 60·0 months [IQR 60·0-60·0]). 5-year progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population was 65·0% (95% CI 49·4-76·9), and overall survival was 69·3% (53·7-80·6). Disease progression occurred in 11 (24%) patients; 14 (30%) patients died, including nine (20%) from disease relapse and five (11%) from non-tumour-related causes. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of grade 3 or worse occurred in 14 (30%) of 46 patients during neoadjuvant treatment and in seven (19%) of 37 during adjuvant treatment. The most common grade 3 or worse TRAEs were increased lipase and febrile neutropenia (three [7%] each) during neoadjuvant treatment, and elevated serum lipase (four [7%]) and elevated serum amylase (three [8%]) during adjuvant treatment. Serious TRAEs included elevated serum lipase and neutropenia (one [2%] each) during neoadjuvant treatment, and elevated serum lipase (one [3%]) during adjuvant treatment. No treatment-related surgery delays, deaths, or unexpected long-term toxicities were reported. Perioperative chemoimmunotherapy showed a promising long-term benefit with no concerning safety data, reinforcing its use in resectable stage IIIA NSCLC. Bristol-Myers Squibb, Spanish Ministry of Science, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, European Union.

Brief report: Ivonescimab combined with etoposide plus carboplatin as first-line treatment for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: results of a phase Ib clinical trial

INTRODUCTIONIvonescimab is a humanized IgG1 bispecific anti-PD-1/VEGF antibody. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and tolerance of ivonescimab combined with etoposide and carboplatin as first-line treatment in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) and explore the primary efficacy of this regimen. METHODSEligible patients received intravenous ivonescimab 3 mg/kg, 10 mg/kg, or 20 mg/kg every 3 weeks combined with etoposide and carboplatin for up to 4 cycles, followed by ivonescimab as maintenance. The primary endpoints were safety and objective response rate (ORR). RESULTSBetween April 23, 2021 and December 2, 2021, 35 patients were enrolled. At data cutoff (October 25, 2023), the median follow-up was 13.3 months (range, 0.3-28.5). For all patients, the confirmed ORR and disease control rate were 80% and 91.4%, respectively. The ORR was 66.7%, 90.9%, and 76.2% at the dose of 3 mg/kg, 10 mg/kg, and 20 mg/kg, respectively. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were observed in 21 patients (60%), and the most frequent toxicities were decreased neutrophil count (n=8, 22.9%), decreased white blood cell count (n=5, 14.3%), and anemia (n=5, 14.3%). Grade ≥3 TRAEs occurred in 66.7%, 54.5%, and 61.9% of patients in 3, 10, and 20 mg/kg groups, respectively. TRAEs leading to death were reported in 2 patients (5.7%). Adverse events with potential immunologic etiology, most of them grade 1 or 2, occurred in 14 patients (40.0%). CONCLUSIONSIvonescimab in combination with etoposide and carboplatin was well-tolerated and showed promising antitumor activity in ES-SCLC.

Clinical Management in NSCLC Patients With EGFR Mutation After Osimertinib Progression With Unknown Resistance Mechanisms.

Osimertinib is approved as a standard treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation by FDA. However, the mechanisms of resistance for nearly half of patients after osimertinib progression are still unknown, and the optimal therapies for these patients are still controversial. In this retrospective study, we compared efficacy and safety between immunotherapy + chemotherapy, chemotherapy alone, and osimertinib + bevacizumab in NSCLC patients after osimertinib progression with unknown resistance mechanisms. Advanced NSCLC patients with unknown resistance mechanisms after osimertinib progression were retrospectively reviewed and divided into immunotherapy + chemotherapy, chemotherapy alone, and osimertinib + bevacizumab treatment groups according to the treatment they received after osimertinib progression. Clinicopathological features, objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared between groups. A total of 121 patients were enrolled in this study, 22 in the immunotherapy + chemotherapy group, 72 in the chemotherapy group, and 27 in the osimertinib + bevacizumab group. The ORR was much higher in the immunotherapy + chemotherapy group compared with chemotherapy or osimertinib + bevacizumab group (55.56% vs. 14.81% vs. 0% in patients after progression on 1st line osimertinib treatment; 30.77% vs. 6.67% vs. 13.33% in patients after progression on 2nd/3rd line osimertinib treatment). Median PFS was also significantly longer in the immunotherapy + chemotherapy group compared with other groups (8.2 months vs. 4.0 months vs. 6.0 months in all patients, p = 0.0066). The median OS did not reach remarkable difference among groups, although osimertinib + bevacizumab group had a numerically longer median OS (37.0 months vs. 37.0 months vs. 47.6 months in all patients, p = 0.6357). Compared with immunotherapy + chemotherapy and chemotherapy, treatment-related adverse events (AEs) of osimertinib + bevacizumab were milder, especially in AEs related to gastrointestinal and bone marrow suppression. Our study provides clinical evidence that NSCLC patients after osimertinib progression with unknown resistance mechanisms may benefit from immunotherapy + chemotherapy, with higher ORR and longer PFS compared with osimertinib + bevacizumab or chemotherapy groups. Osimertinib + bevacizumab treatment was also an optional option for patients because OS was numerically longer and safer in this group.

Efficacy of Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab Combined with Transarterial Chemoembolization for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Real-World Study.

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), when used in combination with immunotherapy and antiangiogenic therapy, has been shown to have synergistic anticancer effects. The aim of this study was to further assess the efficacy and safety of TACE combined with atezolizumab and bevacizumab in the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the real world. Between August 2021 and September 2023, clinical information was collected from consecutive HCC patients who received treatment via TACE-Atezo/Bev at four tertiary institutions. This study evaluated the objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) as outcomes. Predictors for OS and PFS were also analyzed. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were recorded and assessed. Ninety-two patients were enrolled in this study, with a median follow-up duration of 14.1 months. The ORRs based on the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) and RECIST 1.1 criteria were 54.3% and 41.3%, respectively. The median OS and PFS of the patients were 15.9 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 14.5-17.2 months] and 9.1 months (95% CI, 7.4-10.8 months), respectively. Multivariate analyses revealed that the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score and neutrophil‒lymphocyte ratio were independent risk factors for OS, whereas tumor size and extrahepatic metastasis were independent risk factors for PFS. Grade 3/4 TRAEs occurred in 16.3% (15/92) of the patients and were controlled conservatively. The combination of Atezo/Bev with TACE demonstrated acceptable synergistic therapeutic effects and manageable safety profiles in patients with unresectable HCC.

A phase 2/3 study of romiplostim N01 in chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CIT).

217 Background: CIT causes dose reduction or delay of chemotherapy (chemo), bleeding, and platelet (PLT) transfusion. This phase 2/3 study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of romiplostim N01 in CIT. Methods: This trial comprising Part A (open-label) and B (randomized double-blinded) recruited patients (pts) with solid tumors or lymphoma and with CIT. In Part A, pts with a PLT count ≤200×10 9 /L before the day of chemo were included. Romiplostim N01 was injected subcutaneously per week (QW) for a 3-week chemo cycle at 1 μg/kg (group 1) or 2 μg/kg (group 2) for pts with a PLT count 100~200×10 9 /L, and at 2 μg/kg (group 3) for pts with a PLT count &lt;100×10 9 /L. Primary endpoint was proportion of responders on the last day of chemo cycle, defined as pts who had an increase in PLT count of ≥30×10 9 /L from baseline for pts with a PLT count 100~200×10 9 /L, and an increase in PLT count of ≥30×10 9 /L or a PLT count ≥100×10 9 /L for pts with a PLT count &lt;100×10 9 /L. In Part B, pts with a PLT count 75~150×10 9 /L were included and randomized 2:1 to receive romiplostim N01 or placebo QW at 2 μg/kg on day 1, and at 1 μg/kg on day 8 and 15 for two chemo cycles. Primary endpoint was proportion of responders, defined as pts resuming two consecutive chemo cycles without thrombocytopenia-induced dose modification (dose reduction by ≥15% or delay by ≥4 days or discontinuation) and without a rescue therapy. Results: In Part A, 50 pts were included between Mar 12, 2021 and Jul 29, 2021. The proportions of responders were 66.7% (10/15) in group 1, 53.3% (8/15) in group 2, and 90.0% (18/20) in group 3. Between Nov 8, 2022 and Jan 15, 2024, 63 pts were randomized in Part B. The proportion of responders in the romiplostim N01 group was significantly higher than that in placebo group (68.3% vs 40.9%). The adjusted rate difference was 27.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.1%, 50.2%). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 17 (41.5%) and 12 (54.5%) pts in the romiplostim N01 and placebo groups, of whom 1 (2.4%) and 0 were ≥grade 3. The most frequent TRAEs were nausea (12.2% vs 0), vomiting (12.2% vs 0), and increased aspartate aminotransferase (9.8% vs 4.5%). No treatment-related hemorrhage or death occurred. In pool analysis, the proportion of responders was 73.3% and 40.9% in pts treated with romiplostim N01 and placebo, respectively. The rate difference was 32.4% (95% CI: 9.2%, 52.9%). Conclusions: Romiplostim N01 showed promising efficacy and manageable safety in patients with CIT. Clinical trial information: PartA:NCT05851027 ; PartB:NCT05554913 . Pool analysis of Part A (pts with PLT count ≥75×10 9 /L) and Part B (all pts). Romiplostim N01 Placebo Rate Difference Part A+B (n=75) Part B (n=22) Romiplostim N01 (Part A+B) vs Placebo Lowest PLT count in Cycle 1, ×10 9 /L 85±41 59±32 / Highest PLT count in Cycle 1, ×10 9 /L 226±101 132±45 / Proportion of responders who completed the first chemo cycle without rescue therapy and without thrombocytopenia-induced dose modification of the second chemo cycle 55 (73.3%) 9 (40.9%) 32.4% 95% CI 61.9~82.9% 20.7~63.6% 9.2~52.9%

A Meta-Analysis of Efficacy and Safety of Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy Plus Chemotherapy for Resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemotherapy has ushered in a new era for surgical treatment for patients with NSCLC. This study aimed to examine the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemotherapy in NSCLC. Eligible studies were identified from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and conference meeting abstracts. The endpoints included major pathological response (MPR), complete pathological response (pCR), surgical resection rate, R0 resection, treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), severe adverse events (SAEs), surgical complications, treatment discontinuation, surgical delay, and treatment-related death. Stata 18 software was used for statistical analysis, and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Twenty-two studies including a total of 1108 patients were eligible for this study. Among the patients who received neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemotherapy, the pooled MPR rate was 51% (95% CI [0.44-0.58]), and pCR rate was 34% (95% CI [0.28-0.40]). The pooled surgical resection rate was 85% (95% CI [0.81-0.89]), and the pooled R0 rate was 94% (95% CI [0.91-0.96]). The pooled rate of pathological tumor downstaging was 84% (95% CI [0.79-0.88]), and the pooled rate of pathological nodal downstaging was 38% (95% CI [0.23-0.57]). During the treatment of neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemotherapy with or without surgery, the pooled rate of TRAEs (any grade) was 84% (95% CI [0.73-0.91]), and the pooled rate of SAEs was 29% (95% CI [0.21-0.38]). Surgical complications pooled rate was 25% (95% CI [0.14-0.41]). The pooled rate of treatment discontinuation (11%, 95% CI [0.09-0.13]), surgical delay (3%, 95% CI [0.02-0.05]), and treatment-related death (2%, 95% CI [0.02-0.03]) were conducted. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemotherapy provides a high pathological response, surgical resection rate, R0 resection rate, and pathological downstage rate and has a low risk of increasing the incidence of SAEs, surgical complications, treatment discontinuation, surgical delay, and treatment-related death. The validation of prospective and large sample studies is needed to confirm this conclusion.

Efficacy and Safety of Potassium-competitive Acid Blockers Versus Proton Pump Inhibitors in Treating Erosive Esophagitis: A Meta-analysis Based on Randomized Controlled Trials.

This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in treating erosive esophagitis (EE). PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were systematically searched using predefined search terms up to January 2024. Relevant randomized controlled trials were included. The outcoming were the EE healing rate and treatment-related adverse events incidence. Nine randomized controlled trials involving 4012 patients were included. Patients receiving P-CAB exhibited a significantly better overall healing rate compared with PPI at week 2 [risk ratio (RR) = 1.06], but no statistical difference was observed at week 4 and week 8. Subgroup analysis revealed that P-CAB demonstrated a higher healing rate for patients with Los Angeles (LA) grade C/D, regardless of the assessment at week 2 (RR = 1.17), week 4 (RR = 1.10), or week 8 (RR = 1.08). However, no significant difference was found between PPI and P-CAB for patients with LA grade A/B at week 2, week 4, or week 8. Furthermore, patients treated with P-CAB had lower recurrence rates during maintenance therapy compared with PPI (RR = 0.79). In terms of safety, P-CAB was associated with a lower incidence of headache compared with PPI (RR = 0.32), with no statistical difference found in any treatment-related adverse events between the two groups. P-CAB was found to be safe and effective for EE treatment compared with PPI, particularly in 2-week short-term treatment, severe EE (LA grade C/D) treatment, or maintenance therapy. Limitations such as potential heterogeneity among included trials should be considered in the interpretation of these findings.

Neoadjuvant treatment with regorafenib and capecitabine combined with radiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: a multicenter phase Ib trial (RECAP)–SAKK 41/16

BackgroundThe multi tyrosine kinase inhibitor regorafenib is active in metastatic colorectal cancer. Improvement in clinical outcome by adding regorafenib to long-course chemoradiotherapy (LcCRT) was investigated in molecularly undefined LARC. MethodsPatients with T3–4 and/or N+ but M0 rectal cancer were included. Neoadjuvant LcRCT consisted in capecitabine (C) 825mg/m2 d1–d38 and 28 fractions of 1.8Gy (50.4Gy). Regorafenib was added d1–14 and d22–35 in three dose escalation (DE) cohorts (40mg/80mg/120mg). The recommended dose (RD) was used for the expansion (EXP) cohort. Primary endpoints were dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) for DE and pathological response (near-complete regression [npCR] or complete regression [pCR]) for EXP. ResultsOverall, 25 patients were included. Two DLTs occurred at the regorafenib dose level of 120 mg, thereby establishing the RD at 80mg daily. Among the 19 patients who were treated at the RD, eight (42.1%; one-sided 80% confidence interval [CI] (lower bound): 30.7%; 95% CI: 20.3%–66.5%) reached the primary endpoint (five [26.3%] had npCR and three [15.8%] pCR). One additional patient received no surgery due to clinical complete response. All patients had R0 resections and clear circumferential margins. Postoperative complications occurred in six patients (35.3%). The most common grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse event in the EXP cohort was diarrhea (two patients). ConclusionAdding regorafenib 80mg to LcCRT in LARC resulted in both primary endpoints being met and yielded an expectedpathological response rate. Toxicity was manageable, and postoperative complications were as expected. Micro AbstractThe SAKK 41/16 study investigated the addition of regorafenib to the standard neoadjvuant chemoradiation with capecitabine. We could show expected pathological response rate and manageable toxicity at the recommended dose of regorafenib. Regorafenib may be potential partner for future trials investigating treatment intensification for high-risk locally advanced rectal cancer.

The effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring with remote telemonitoring-enabled virtual educator visits in adults with non-insulin dependent type 2 diabetes: A randomized trial

AimsEstimate the effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) with remote telemonitoring-enabled virtual diabetes educator visits for improving glycemic management in adults with type 2 diabetes, not on insulin. MethodsParticipants with type 2 diabetes, not on insulin, and HbA1c > 7.0 % were enrolled in an open-label randomized trial of 6 weeks of CGM with telemonitoring versus enhanced usual care. Both groups received educator visits. HbA1c was assessed at 12 weeks. ResultsOf 105 participants (mean age 57.3 years, 49.5 % females, mean baseline HbA1c 8.0 %), 86 remained at follow-up. Change in HbA1c was −0.69 % (CGM) versus −0.33 % (enhanced usual care). Adjusting for baseline HbA1c, CGM was superior (0.65 % greater HbA1c reduction [95 % CI 0.17–1.12 %], p = 0.008). CGM participants were 92 % (RR = 1.92, 1.19–3.06, p = 0.007) more likely to have an HbA1c reduction ≥ 0.5 %, lost more weight (difference in weight reduction 2.17 kg, 0.22–4.11, p = 0.029) and were more satisfied with their treatment. No treatment-related adverse events were observed. ConclusionsCGM with virtual diabetes educator visits is effective, safe, and acceptable in adults with type 2 diabetes not on insulin and should be considered as an alternative to drug therapy for improving blood glucose.

Long-term efficacy and safety of cannabidiol in patients with tuberous sclerosis complex: 3-year results from the cannabidiol expanded access program.

The cannabidiol (CBD) Expanded Access Program provided compassionate access to CBD for patients with treatment-resistant epilepsy, including tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC), at 35 US epilepsy centers. Here, we present the long-term efficacy and safety outcomes for add-on CBD treatment in patients with TSC. Patients received plant-derived, highly purified CBD (Epidiolex® 100 mg/mL, oral solution), increasing from 2 to 10 mg/kg/d to tolerance or maximum of 25-50 mg/kg/d. Efficacy endpoints were percentage change from baseline in median monthly convulsive, focal, and total seizure frequency and ≥ 50%, ≥75%, and 100% responder rates across 12-week visit windows through 144 weeks. Adverse events (AEs) are reported through 233 weeks. Thirty-four patients with confirmed TSC were included. Mean age was 12.4 years (range, 1.8-31.2), and patients were receiving a median of 3 (range, 1-7) antiseizure medications (ASMs) at baseline. Median CBD dose was 25-28 mg/kg/d for 36 weeks and then 20-50 mg/kg/d through 228 weeks. Dose reduction from baseline occurred for most ASMs, except topiramate. Median reduction in the frequency of convulsive, focal, and total seizures was 44%-81%, 51%-87%, and 44%-87%, respectively, through 144 weeks. Responder rates (≥50%, ≥75%, and 100% reduction) were 43%-71%, 14%-58%, and 0%-25% for convulsive seizures; 52%-75%, 35%-60%, and 7%-32% for focal seizures; and 46%-79%, 26%-65%, and 0%-13% for total seizures. A total of 94% of patients experienced ≥1 AE; 47% had serious AEs, considered treatment unrelated by the investigator. Treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) occurred in 71% of patients. The most frequently reported TRAEs were somnolence, diarrhea, and ataxia. Two patients experienced AEs leading to discontinuation. There were no deaths. Long-term add-on CBD use was associated with reduced seizure frequency through 144 weeks. The safety profile was consistent with previous reports. In this study, we evaluated efficacy and safety of cannabidiol (CBD) treatment in patients with tuberous sclerosis complex receiving CBD in addition to other antiseizure treatments in an Expanded Access Program. After starting CBD, 46%-79% of patients had at least 50% reduction and 26%-65% had at least 75% reduction in the number of seizures per month; up to 13% had no seizures through 144 weeks. Safety results were similar to prior studies; sleepiness and diarrhea were common treatment-related side effects. These results show that long-term CBD treatment was associated with fewer seizures and mild/moderate side effects.

Avelumab first-line maintenance for locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma: results from the real-world US PATRIOT-II study

Introduction: In JAVELIN Bladder 100, avelumab first-line maintenance (1LM) improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC) without progression following 1L platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) vs best supportive care. PATRIOT-II describes real-world outcomes with avelumab 1LM. Patients and Methods: This observational, retrospective study of avelumab 1LM in US community/academic centers used medical record data collected from avelumab initiation for ≥12 months to assess survival, safety, and healthcare resource utilization; analyses are descriptive. Results: The study included 160 patients from 37 centers (median age, 70 years; 77% male). Avelumab 1LM was initiated at a median of 4 weeks (IQR 3-6) after PBC completion. Median follow-up from avelumab 1LM was 16 months (IQR 11-21). At study end, 19.4% of patients continued avelumab; 73.7% had discontinued due to progression, adverse events (AEs), or performance status deterioration. Median PFS and OS from avelumab initiation were 5.4 months (95% CI 3.8-6.9) and 24.4 months (95% CI 20.4-28.4), respectively. Grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) occurred in 15 patients (9.4%); 35 (21.9%) had any-grade immune-related AEs, and 23 (14.3%) received high-dose systemic corticosteroids for AEs. Forty-four patients (27.5%) were hospitalized during the avelumab treatment period, of whom 13 (8.1%) were hospitalized due to TRAEs. Limitations of this study include a small sample size, potential selection bias, and missing/unknown data. Conclusion: These results align with the JAVELIN Bladder 100 clinical trial and other real-world studies, supporting avelumab 1LM use in patients with la/mUC without progression following 1L PBC. MICRO-ABSTRACTIn this study, researchers studied 160 people with advanced urothelial cancer in the US receiving avelumab maintenance treatment. These people had already received platinum chemotherapy, and their disease had either gone away, become smaller, or stopped growing. The efficacy and safety of avelumab treatment in these people were comparable to findings from a previous clinical trial and other real-world studies.

Incidence and type of adverse events in patients with cirrhosis receiving terlipressin: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Terlipressin has been widely used for various cirrhosis-related complications, but its safety profile remains controversial. Herein, this issue was systematically evaluated. All studies reporting adverse events (AEs) of terlipressin in cirrhosis were screened. Incidences were pooled using a random-effects model. Subgroup analyses were performed according to the patient's characteristics and treatment regimens. Interaction among subgroups was evaluated. Seventy-eight studies with 7257 patients with cirrhosis were included. The pooled incidences of any AEs, treatment-related AEs, any serious AEs (SAEs), treatment-related SAEs, treatment withdrawal due to AEs, and treatment withdrawal due to treatment-related AEs were 31%, 22%, 5%, 5%, 4%, and 4% in patients with cirrhosis receiving terlipressin, respectively. Patients with hepatorenal syndrome had higher incidences of any SAEs (29% vs. 0% vs. 0%, pinteraction = 0.01) and treatment-related SAEs (8% vs. 1% vs. 7%, pinteraction = 0.02) than those with variceal bleeding or ascites. Patients who received terlipressin with human albumin had higher incidences of any SAEs (18% vs. 1%, pinteraction = 0.04) and treatment-related SAEs (7% vs. 0%, pinteraction = 0.09) than those without albumin. Patients with total bilirubin level >4.3mg/dL had higher incidences of any AEs (69% vs. 24%, pinteraction = 0.02), any SAEs (64% vs. 0%, pinteraction < 0.01), and treatment-related SAEs (8% vs. 1%, pinteraction = 0.04) than those ≤4.3mg/dL. AEs are common in patients with cirrhosis receiving terlipressin and influenced by clinical scenarios, combination with albumin, and bilirubin levels.

Mepolizumab in CRSwNP/ECRS and NP: the phase III randomised MERIT trial in Japan, China, and Russia.

This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, 52-week Phase III study (MERIT; NCT04607005) assessed mepolizumab efficacy and safety in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP)/eosinophilic CRS (ECRS) in Japan, Russia, and China, for which data are limited. Eligible patients (enrolled at 60 centres) had blood eosinophil count >2%, endoscopic bilateral NP score ≥5, nasal obstruction visual analogue scale (VAS) score >5, ≥2 sinonasal symptoms, and either previous sinus surgery or systemic corticosteroid use/intolerance. Patients were randomised (1:1) to receive mepolizumab 100 mg subcutaneously or placebo every 4 weeks, plus standard of care. Co-primary endpoints: change from baseline in total endoscopic NP score (ENPS) (Week 52) and nasal obstruction VAS score (Weeks 49-52). Post hoc analyses conducted in a modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population excluded patients from two study sites, related to Good Clinical Practice violations by the Site Management Organisation overseeing these sites. These were considered the primary efficacy analyses. In the mITT population, mepolizumab (n=80) versus placebo (n=83) significantly improved nasal obstruction VAS score from baseline to Week 49-52 and was associated with a trend of total ENPS improvements at Week 52. Mepolizumab/placebo on-treatment adverse events (AEs) occurred in 68/84 and 65/85 patients in the safety population (treatment-related AEs: 2/84 and 5/85, respectively), and on-treatment serious AEs in 0/84 and 4/85 patients, respectively (no fatalities reported). Mepolizumab was effective and well-tolerated in patients with CRSwNP/ECRS from Japan, Russia, and China.