Treatment Of Unstable Intertrochanteric Femoral Fractures Research Articles

Proximal femoral bionic nail (PFBN)-an innovative surgical method for unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures.

Intertrochanteric femoral fractures (IFF) are one of the most common traumatic conditions, but there are no established treatment methods for this condition due to implant failure and re-operation rates. The proximal femoral bionic nail (PFBN), which is a new design of the cephalomedullary nail, was developed by our team. The objective of this study was to assess the clinical and radiographic outcomes of PFBN in patients with unstable IFF. From October 2020 to August 2021, 12 patients diagnosed with unstable IFF (31-A2, 3) were treated with PFBN at the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University. We evaluated the clinical therapeutic effects of this treatment by measuring peri-operative indicators and post-operative complications. Clinical outcomes, specific radiographic parameters, and post-operative complications were collected and analyzed within the first post-operative year. The average age of the patients was 72.4 ± 16.1years (five males and seven females). The mean operation time was 90.4 ± 16.0min, whereas the operation time of 31-A2 fractures (83.1 ± 12.2min) was shorter than that of 31-A3 fractures (105.0 ± 12.9min) (p < 0.05). The blood loss was 175ml (range: 50 to 500ml), and the length of hospitalization was 10.0 ± 1.9days. The prognosis evaluation was assessed at three, six and 12months after the operation; for these time points, the Harris hip scores were 69.6 ± 4.1, 77.8 ± 3.8, and 82.6 ± 4.6, respectively, and the Parker-Palmer scores were 5.3 (5.0, 7.0), 6.3 (5.3, 7.0), and 7.8 (7.0, 8.0), respectively. PFBN has shown advantages in the treatment of unstable IFF (particularly in geriatric patients) and possesses both stability and safety. This innovative method may provide a new option for treating unstable IFFs.

Arthroplasty vs proximal femoral nails for unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures in elderly patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUNDProximal femoral nails (PFNs) are the most common method for the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures (IFFs), but postoperative bed rest is required. There is a large amount of blood loss during the operation. Osteoporosis in elderly patients may cause nonunion of fractures and other complications. Arthroplasty can give patients early weight bearing and reduce financial burden, but whether it can replace PFNs remains controversial.AIMTo compare the clinical outcomes of arthroplasty and PFNs in the treatment of unstable IFFs in elderly patients.METHODSA search was conducted in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases and included relevant articles comparing arthroplasty and PFN. The search time was limited from January 1, 2005 to November 1, 2020. Two investigators independently screened studies, extracted data and evaluated the quality according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. According to the research results, the fixed effect model or random effect model were selected for analysis. The following outcomes were analyzed: Harris Hip score, mortality, complications, operation time, blood loos, hospital stay, weight-bearing time, fracture classification and type of anesthesia.RESULTSWe analyzed four randomized controlled trials that met the requirements. A total of 298 patients were included in these studies. According to the AO/OTA classification, there are 20 A1 types, 136 A2 types, 42 A3 types and 100 unrecorded types. Primary outcome: The Harris Hip Score at the final follow-up of the PFN group was higher [mean difference (MD): 9.01, 95% confidence interval (CI): 16.57 to 1.45), P = 0.02]. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the rate of overall mortality [risk ratio (RR): 1.44, P = 0.44] or the number of complications (RR: 0.77, P = 0.05). Secondary outcomes: blood loss of the arthroplasty group was higher (MD: 241.01, 95% CI: 43.06–438.96, P = 0.02); the operation time of the PFN group was shorter (MD: 23.12, 95%CI: 10.46–35.77, P = 0.0003); and the length of hospital stay of the arthroplasty group was shorter [MD: 0.97, 95% CI: 1.29 to 0.66), P < 0.00001]. There was no difference between the two groups in the type of anesthesia (RR: 0.99). There were only two studies recording the weight-bearing time, and the time of full weight bearing in the arthroplasty group was significantly earlier.CONCLUSIONCompared with PFN, arthroplasty can achieve weight bearing earlier and shorten hospital stay, but it cannot achieve a better clinical outcome. Arthroplasty cannot replace PFNs in the treatment of unstable IFFs in elderly individuals.