Treatment Of Slow Transit Constipation Research Articles

Role of segmental colonic transit time studies to select patients with slow transit constipation for partial left-sided or subtotal colectomy.

This prospective study investigated the value of segmental colonic transit time studies in the surgical treatment of slow transit constipation. Overall, 346 patients with chronic constipation were analysed; slow transit constipation was diagnosed in 86 (25 per cent). Based on the results of segmental colonic transit time studies, 18 patients underwent partial left-sided colectomy and 24 subtotal colectomy. Recurrent constipation was seen in three of 18 patients and seven of 24 respectively. Severe abdominal discomfort was noted in six of 18 and 15 of 24 respectively. Disabling diarrhoea and faecal incontinence developed in two of 14 and five of 20 patients with an anastomosis respectively. Although these results indicate that segmental colonic transit time studies are useful in selecting patients with slow transit constipation for partial left-sided or subtotal colectomy, both procedures should be performed with prudence.

Antegrade continence enemas in the treatment of slow-transit constipation

Background/Purpose: Children with anorectal dysfunction can now be treated by antegrade continence enema (ACE), as described Malone et al. Those with idiopathic constipation, however, are not thought to be suitable for this treatment. Over 150 children attend the authors' department with proven slow transit constipation (mostly proven on nuclear transit/X-ray study), and the authors reviewed the outcome in the 40 of these who have had the ACE procedure. Families completed a questionnaire and attended interview with an independent assessor. Methods: Of the 40 patients, 32 patients were assessed. Follow-up ranged from 3 to 54 months (median, 18 months) and age ranged from 5 to 17 years (median age, 10 years). Three of 32 stomas were no longer in use. Frequency of soiling was reduced significantly in 20 patients, and a further 6 patients were clean (P <.01). Abdominal pains were relieved significantly (P <.05), and appetite and mood improved. Results: Stomal complications were frequent, (stenosis in 16 of 29, mucus leak in 20 of 29, fecal leak 3 of 29, catheter-related pain in 20 of 29). Slow evacuation (12 of 29) and pain with enema (17 of 20) also were common. Conclusion: Malone appendicostomy does improve the well being of patients with slow transit constipation, but the advantages are less dramatic than in children with normal motility. J Pediatr Surg 36:1227-1230. Copyright © 2001 by W.B. Saunders Company.

Outcome of colectomy for slow transit constipation.

To review the outcome data for colectomy performed for patients with slow transit constipation (STC). The outcome of surgical intervention in patients with STC is unpredictable. This may be a consequence of the lack of effectiveness of such interventions or may reflect heterogeneity within this group of patients. The authors reviewed the data of all series in the English language that document the outcome of colectomy in > or = 10 patients in the treatment of STC. Thirty-two series fulfilled the entry criteria. There was widespread variability in patient satisfaction rates after colectomy (39% to 100%), reflecting large differences in the incidence of postoperative complications and in long-term functional results. Outcome was dependent on several clinical and pathophysiologic findings and on the type of study, the population studied, and the surgical procedure used. It may be possible to predict outcome on the basis of preoperative clinical and pathophysiologic findings. This review suggests a rationale for the selection of patients for colectomy.

The surgical management of constipation

The anal physiology laboratory plays a very important role in the selection of patients for surgical treatment for constipation. Any report which does not include reference to these methods of evaluation will not be helpful since there are several causes of constipation. The current recommended treatment for slow transit constipation is still total abdominal colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis. Treatment of pelvic floor outlet obstruction seems to be best accomplished using muscle/sensory retraining techniques since this is a functional disorder rather than an anatomical or physiological disorder. Combinations of colonic inertia, pelvic floor outlet obstruction and internal intussusception should be treated to correct the pelvic floor outlet obstruction initially, followed by correction of the colonic inertia. In this way failure will be avoided at the time of surgical treatment of the constipation.

Surgical Treatment of Severe Constipation

Severe constipation may be treated surgically provided precise evaluation of colon-transit-time and rectal evacuation can be performed. Colon-transit-time may be studied by straight X-ray of the abdomen after oral intake of small plastic markers, and rectal evacuation may be evaluated by defecography. In patients, where Hirschsprung's disease with a short aganglionic segment is suspected, ano-rectal manometry with evaluation of the recto-anal reflex must be performed. Furthermore, electromyography of the external anal sphincter and puborectal muscle during simulated defecation will be necessary in order to evaluate whether obstructed defecation is due to a spastic condition in the anal sphincter or pelvic floor muscles (anismus). Surgical treatment of obstructed defecation depends on the specific pathology, while treatment of slow transit constipation is subtotal colectomy and ileo-rectal anastomosis. In patients, where constipation is based on a combination of obstructed defecation and prolonged colon-transit-time, surgery for obstructed defecation should be carried out first. In patients, where the constipation is due to prolonged colon-transit-time and an adynamic rectum (rectal inertia) without anatomical abnormalities the only possibility of surgical treatment is total colectomy with an ileo-anal pouch.

A classic reference on ... The History of Pharmacy: Kremers and Urdang's History of Pharmacy

Slow transit constipation (STC) is a common gastrointestinal disorder seriously impacting patients’ quality of life. At present, although conventional chemical drugs effectively control STC symptoms in the short term, the long-term effects are poor, and the side effects are significant. In this regard, traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) offers an opportunity for STC treatment. Many pharmacological and clinical studies have confirmed this efficacy of TCM with multiple targets and mechanisms.This review attempted to summarize the characteristics of TCM (compound prescriptions, single Chinese herbs, and active ingredients) for STC treatment and discussed their efficacy based on analyzing the pathogenesis of STC.The information was acquired from different databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang databases. We then focused on the recent research progress in STC treatment by TCM. Finally, the future challenges and trends are proposed.TCM has good clinical efficacy in the treatment of STC with multi-mechanisms. Based on the theory of syndrome differentiation, five kinds of dialectical treatment for STC by compound TCM prescriptions were introduced, namely: Nourishing Yin and moistening the intestines; Promoting blood circulation and removing blood stasis; Warming Yang and benefiting Qi; Soothing the liver and regulating Qi; and Benefiting Qi and strengthening the spleen. In addition, six single Chinese herbs and eight active ingredients also show good efficacy in STC treatment.TCM, especially compound prescriptions, has bright prospects in treating STC attributed to its various holistic effects.