Treatment Of Pulmonary Exacerbations Research Articles

Prospective cohort study of ototoxicity in persons with cystic fibrosis following a single course of intravenous tobramycin

IntroductionAminoglycoside (AG) antibiotics, such as tobramycin, are known to be ototoxic but important clinically due to their bactericidal efficacy. Persons with cystic fibrosis (CF) are at risk for AG-induced ototoxicity due to the repeated use of intravenous (IV) tobramycin for the treatment of pulmonary exacerbations. While it is well-established that ototoxic hearing loss is highly prevalent in this clinical population, the progression of hearing loss over time remains unclear. Cumulative IV-AG dosing has been associated with a higher risk of ototoxic hearing loss, yet some individuals lose substantial hearing after a single IV-AG treatment, while others never seem to lose hearing. Methods31 persons with CF (18 on IV tobramycin, 13 controls) were enrolled in an observational study. Pure-tone hearing thresholds (0.25–16 kHz) were measured at baseline (pre-treatment) and at follow-up for each subject. A hearing shift was determined using various metrics, and outcomes were compared to characterize changes in hearing bilaterally for both study groups. ResultsComparison of pure-tone threshold shifts between baseline and follow-up audiograms following either a course of IV tobramycin (n = 18) or no intervening therapy (n = 13) demonstrated significant (p < 0.05) threshold shifts in all continuous metrics tested. ConclusionA single course of IV tobramycin causes ototoxic hearing loss in some people with CF, which supports the need for routine ototoxicity monitoring and management in this clinical population. These findings also suggest that people with CF are a suitable population for clinical trials examining ototherapeutics in single IV-tobramycin treatment episodes.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa antimicrobial susceptibility test (AST) results and pulmonary exacerbation treatment responses in cystic fibrosis

Background Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of bacterial isolates is a time- and resource-intensive procedure recommended by cystic fibrosis (CF) treatment guidelines for antimicrobial selection for pulmonary exacerbation (PEx) treatment.Methods We studied relationships between Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Pa) isolate AST results, antipseudomonal PEx treatments, and treatment responses as change in weight and percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s (ppFEV1) as well as future antimicrobial treatment hazard for PEx occurring at a CF care center from 1999 through 2018. Treatments were categorized by “Pa coverage” as complete (all Pa isolates susceptible by AST to at least one administered agent), none (no isolates susceptible), incomplete (some, but not all isolates susceptible), and indeterminant (administered antipseudomonals not evaluated by AST). Weight and ppFEV1 responses were compared across Pa coverage categories using unadjusted and adjusted general estimating equations; hazard of future treatment was assessed by Cox and logistic regression.Results Among 3820 antimicrobial PEx treatment events in 413 patients with Pa, 62.6% (2390) had complete Pa coverage; 8.9% (340), 2.4% (99), and 26.2% (1000), had no, incomplete, and indeterminant Pa coverage, respectively. Mean baseline to follow-up weight change was +0.74 kg [95% CI 0.63, 0.86]; ppFEV1 change was +1.60 [1.29, 1.90]. Pa coverage category was not associated with significant differences in weight or ppFEV1 change or with future antimicrobial treatment hazard.Conclusions We did not observe superior responses for AST-defined complete Pa coverage treatments versus lesser coverage treatments, suggesting that AST may be of little utility in choosing antimicrobials for CF PEx treatment.

WS04.3 Changes in symptom scores as a potential clinical endpoint for studies of pulmonary exacerbation treatment

WS04.3 Changes in symptom scores as a potential clinical endpoint for studies of pulmonary exacerbation treatment

Exploring the Relationship between FEV1 Loss and Recovery and Aminoglycoside Pharmacokinetics in Adult Patients with Cystic Fibrosis: Implications for Clinical Dosing Strategies.

Systemic aminoglycosides remain a cornerstone of treatment for cystic fibrosis (CF) pulmonary exacerbations (PEx); however, the impact of aminoglycoside pharmacokinetics (PK) on outcomes is not well defined in adult CF patients. Our objective was to assess the impact of increasing PK exposures on the clinical outcomes of PEx treatment in adult CF patients receiving high-dose and standard-dose extended-interval aminoglycosides. We conducted a retrospective study of adult CF patients treated with an intravenous aminoglycoside for a PEx. Serum amikacin, gentamicin, and tobramycin levels and forced expiratory volume over 1 second (FEV1 ) data were used to evaluate exposure-response relationships. PK parameters were estimated using a Bayesian approach to obtain area under the curve (AUC)0-24 hr , maximum concentration (Cmax0-24 hr ), and minimum concentration (Cmin0-24 hr ) estimates. The primary efficacy end point was a 90% recovery of baseline FEV1 by 30days posttreatment. Toxicity included signs or symptoms of ototoxicity, vestibular toxicity, or renal toxicity. Multivariate linear mixed-effects models of FEV1 were used for exposure-response analysis. The study included 51 patients who contributed 188 FEV1 observations. There were 3.0±1.7 (mean±SD) aminoglycoside concentrations per patient. The mean AUC0-24 hr , Cmax0-24 hr , and Cmin0-24 hr across all agents and patients were 156±96mg*hr/L, 29.9±12.7mg/L, and 0.35±0.66mg/L, respectively. A total of 42 amikacin-, gentamicin-, or tobramycin-treated patients contributed to the efficacy analysis, of whom 85.7% experienced recovery posttreatment. Of the 51 included patients, 6 (11.8%) experienced seven toxicity events. In exploratory exposure-response analyses, neither AUC0-24 hr nor Cmax0-24 hr was associated with FEV1 values after adjusting for clinical covariates and baseline FEV1 . Increasing aminoglycoside AUC0-24 hr and Cmax0-24 hr were not associated with FEV1 during PEx treatment. Although individualizing aminoglycoside dosing in adult CF patients is necessary to minimize toxicity risk, more work is needed to define optimally safe and effective dosing strategies for this population.

Antibiotic treatment for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in people with cystic fibrosis.

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is one of the most common emerging multi-drug resistant organisms found in the lungs of people with cystic fibrosis and its prevalence is increasing. Chronic infection with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia has recently been shown to be an independent predictor of pulmonary exacerbation requiring hospitalization and antibiotics. However, the role of antibiotic treatment of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infection in people with cystic fibrosis is still unclear. This is an update of a previously published review. The objective of our review is to assess the effectiveness of antibiotic treatment for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in people with cystic fibrosis. The primary objective is to assess this in relation to lung function and pulmonary exacerbations in the setting of acute pulmonary exacerbations. The secondary objective is to assess this in relation to the eradication of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register, compiled from electronic database searches and handsearching of journals and conference abstract books. We also searched a registry of ongoing trials and the reference lists of relevant articles and reviews. Date of latest search: 03 March 2020. Randomized controlled trials of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia mono-infection or Stenotrophomonas maltophilia co-infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa in either the setting of an acute pulmonary exacerbation or a chronic infection treated with suppressive antibiotic therapy. Both authors independently assessed the trials identified by the search for potential inclusion in the review. We identified only one trial of antibiotic treatment of pulmonary exacerbations that included people with cystic fibrosis with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. However, this trial had to be excluded because data was not available per pathogen. This review did not identify any evidence regarding the effectiveness of antibiotic treatment for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in people with cystic fibrosis. Until such evidence becomes available, clinicians need to use their clinical judgement as to whether or not to treat Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infection in people with cystic fibrosis. Randomized clinical trials are needed to address these unanswered clinical questions.

Caregiver Burden Due to Pulmonary Exacerbations in Patients with Cystic Fibrosis

To describe the poorly understood burden of pulmonary exacerbations experienced by primary caregivers of children (aged 2-17years) with cystic fibrosis (CF), who frequently require prolonged hospitalizations for treatment of pulmonary exacerbations with intravenous (IV) antibiotics. In this prospective observational study, 88 caregivers in Germany, Ireland, the United Kingdom, and the US completed a survey during pulmonary exacerbation-related hospitalizations (T1) and after return to a "well state" of health (T2). The impact of pulmonary exacerbations on caregiver-reported productivity, mental/physical health, and social/family/emotional functioning was quantified. Primary caregivers of children with CF reported significantly increased burden during pulmonary exacerbations, as measured by the 12-item Short-Form Health Survey mental health component and the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem absenteeism, presenteeism, work productivity loss, and activity impairment component scores. Compared to the "well state," during pulmonary exacerbations-related hospitalization caregivers reported lower physical health scores on the Child Health Questionnaire-Parent Form 28. Quality-of-life scores on the Caregiver Quality of Life Cystic Fibrosis scale and total support score on the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support did not differ significantly between T1 and T2. More caregivers reported a negative impact on family/social/emotional functioning during pulmonary exacerbations than during the "well state." Pulmonary exacerbations necessitating hospitalization impose a significant burden on primary caregivers of children with CF. Preventing pulmonary exacerbations may substantially reduce this burden.

Improving outcomes of infections in cystic fibrosis in the era of CFTR modulator therapy.

Currently, available single and dual-combination cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator therapies have favorably altered the life course of individuals with cystic fibrosis (CF) by decreasing morbidities and increasing survival. However, even with CFTR modulator use, questions and challenges remain to optimize the management of lung infections. This review (a) identifies these ongoing challenges and discusses the current understanding of the potential impact of CFTR modulator therapy on infections; (b) describes ongoing research to optimize detection, diagnosis, and treatment of CF microorganisms; and (c) discusses strategies to develop new anti-infective therapies. The CF Foundation has launched the Infection Research Initiative to fund research that will improve our understanding of the complex microbial ecology within the CF lung, improve detection of CF pathogens, optimize current treatment, including long-term chronic therapies, and develop new anti-infective therapies. Ongoing clinical trials to determine the optimal duration of treatment of pulmonary exacerbations and to diagnose and treat nontuberculous mycobacteria represent clinical research paradigms that could be used to answer other complex treatment questions. The anti-infective pipeline includes both existing anti-infective and non-anti-infective agents, many of which are proposed to have unique mechanisms of action in CF. Future studies plan to evaluate short- and long-term clinical effectiveness and impact on infections, of the next generation of CFTR modulator therapy, the highly effective triple-combination therapy, for individuals with CF, homozygous or heterozygous for F508del.

Duration of intravenous antibiotic therapy in people with cystic fibrosis.

Progressive lung damage from recurrent exacerbations is the major cause of mortality and morbidity in cystic fibrosis. Life expectancy of people with cystic fibrosis has increased dramatically in the last 40 years. One of the major reasons for this increase is the mounting use of antibiotics to treat chest exacerbations caused by bacterial infections. The optimal duration of intravenous antibiotic therapy is not clearly defined. Individuals usually receive intravenous antibiotics for 14 days, but treatment may range from 10 to 21 days. A shorter duration of antibiotic treatment risks inadequate clearance of infection which could lead to further lung damage. Prolonged courses of intravenous antibiotics are expensive and inconvenient. The risk of systemic side effects such as allergic reactions to antibiotics also increases with prolonged courses and the use of aminoglycosides requires frequent monitoring to minimise some of their side effects. However, some organisms which infect people with cystic fibrosis are known to be multi-resistant to antibiotics, and may require a longer course of treatment. This is an update of previously published reviews. To assess the optimal duration of intravenous antibiotic therapy for treating chest exacerbations in people with cystic fibrosis. We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Trials Register which comprises references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches, handsearches of relevant journals, abstract books and conference proceedings. Most recent search of the Group's Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register: 30 May 2019.We also searched online trials registries. Most recent search of the ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) portal: 06 January 2019. Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing different durations of intravenous antibiotic courses for acute respiratory exacerbations in people with CF, either with the same drugs at the same dosage, the same drugs at a different dosage or frequency or different antibiotics altogether, including studies with additional therapeutic agents. No eligible trials were identified for inclusion. A trial looking at the standardised treatment of pulmonary exacerbations is currently ongoing and will be included when the results are published. MAIN RESULTS: No eligible trials were included. There are no clear guidelines on the optimum duration of intravenous antibiotic treatment. Duration of treatment is currently based on unit policies and response to treatment. Shorter duration of treatment should improve quality of life and adherence, result in a reduced incidence of drug reactions and be less costly. However, the shorter duration may not be sufficient to clear a chest infection and may result in an early recurrence of an exacerbation. This systematic review identifies the need for a multicentre, randomised controlled trial comparing different durations of intravenous antibiotic treatment as it has important clinical and financial implications. The currently ongoing STOP2 trial is expected to provide some guidance on these questions when published.

Once-daily versus multiple-daily dosing with intravenous aminoglycosides for cystic fibrosis.

People with cystic fibrosis, who are chronically colonised with the organism Pseudomonas aeruginosa, often require multiple courses of intravenous aminoglycoside antibiotics for the management of pulmonary exacerbations. The properties of aminoglycosides suggest that they could be given in higher doses less often. This is an update of a previously published review. To assess the effectiveness and safety of once-daily versus multiple-daily dosing of intravenous aminoglycoside antibiotics for the management of pulmonary exacerbations in cystic fibrosis. We searched the Cystic Fibrosis Specialist Register held at the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's editorial base, comprising references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches, handsearching relevant journals and handsearching abstract books of conference proceedings.Date of the most recent search: 31 January 2019.We also searched online trial registries. Date of latest search: 25 February 2019. All randomised controlled trials, whether published or unpublished, in which once-daily dosing of aminoglycosides has been compared with multiple-daily dosing in terms of efficacy or toxicity or both, in people with cystic fibrosis. The two authors independently selected the studies to be included in the review and assessed the risk of bias of each study; authors also assessed the quality of the evidence using the GRADE criteria. Data were independently extracted by each author. Authors of the included studies were contacted for further information. As yet unpublished data were obtained for one of the included studies. We identified 15 studies for possible inclusion in the review. Five studies reporting results from a total of 354 participants (aged 5 to 50 years) were included in this review. All studies compared once-daily dosing with thrice-daily dosing. One cross-over trial had 26 participants who received the first-arm treatment but only 15 received the second arm. One study had a low risk of bias for all criteria assessed; the remaining included studies had a high risk of bias from blinding, but for other criteria were judged to have either an unclear or a low risk of bias.There was little or no difference between treatment groups in: forced expiratory volume in one second, mean difference (MD) 0.33 (95% confidence interval (CI) -2.81 to 3.48, moderate-quality evidence); forced vital capacity, MD 0.29 (95% CI -6.58 to 7.16, low-quality evidence); % weight for height, MD -0.82 (95% CI -3.77 to 2.13, low-quality evidence); body mass index, MD 0.00 (95% CI -0.42 to 0.42, low-quality evidence); or in the incidence of ototoxicity, relative risk 0.56 (95% CI 0.04 to 7.96, moderate-quality evidence). Once-daily treatment in children probably improved the percentage change in creatinine, MD -8.20 (95% CI -15.32 to -1.08, moderate-quality evidence), but showed no difference in adults, MD 3.25 (95% CI -1.82 to 8.33, moderate-quality evidence). The included trials did not report antibiotic resistance patterns or quality of life. Once- and three-times daily aminoglycoside antibiotics appear to be equally effective in the treatment of pulmonary exacerbations of cystic fibrosis. There is evidence of less nephrotoxicity in children.

Parameters to Assess Response to Intra-Venous Antibiotic Treatment for Pulmonary Exacerbations in Cystic Fibrosis

Parameters to Assess Response to Intra-Venous Antibiotic Treatment for Pulmonary Exacerbations in Cystic Fibrosis

Predictors of pulmonary exacerbation treatment in cystic fibrosis

BackgroundMost studies of pulmonary exacerbations (PEx) in cystic fibrosis (CF) focus on intravenous (IV)-treated PEx, though most PEx are treated with oral antibiotics. Our objectives were to describe predictors of antibiotic choice and outcomes for PEx initially identified in clinic. MethodsFor each patient in the U.S. CF Foundation Patient Registry, we selected the first PEx recorded at a clinic visit in 2013–14 following a clinic visit without a PEx. We used multivariable logistic regression to determine associations between clinical characteristics and antibiotic treatment choice. We determined outcomes in the 90 days after the first PEx. ResultsAmong 14,265 patients with a PEx initially identified in clinic, 21.4% received no antibiotics, 61.5% received new oral and/or inhaled antibiotics, and 17.0% had IV antibiotics within 14 days. Compared to IV antibiotics, patients more likely to receive new oral and/or inhaled antibiotics: were male, <13 years old, had BMI >10th percentile or 18.5 kg/m2, >90 days between clinic visits, FEV1 > 70% predicted at the PEx, no prior-year IV-treated PEx, FEV1 decline <10% predicted, and private insurance. Following the PEx, 30.3% of patients had no clinical encounters within 90 days. Treatment with IV antibiotics within 90 days occurred for 23.7% treated without antibiotics, 22.8% of new oral and/or inhaled antibiotics, and 27.1% of IV antibiotics. ConclusionMost PEx identified in clinic are treated with new oral and/or inhaled antibiotics. Markers of disease severity are associated with antibiotic treatment choice. Many patients had no follow-up evaluation within 90 days of treatment.

P140 Microbial community composition in cystic fibrosis patients during treatment for pulmonary exacerbation

P140 Microbial community composition in cystic fibrosis patients during treatment for pulmonary exacerbation

The use of antimicrobial susceptibility testing in pediatric cystic fibrosis pulmonary exacerbations

BackgroundAlthough antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) frequently guides cystic fibrosis (CF) pulmonary exacerbation (PEx) management, its clinical utility is unclear. This study examined associations between AST and antimicrobial switching during PEx treatment and time and occurrence of next PEx as treatment outcomes. MethodsThis retrospective cohort study utilized Pediatric Health Information System data. Children and adolescents aged 1–18 years admitted for a PEx from 2011 to 2016 were studied. Antimicrobial switching was defined as any intra-admission change in intravenous (IV), oral, and/or inhaled antimicrobials. Time to next PEx was defined as the time between index PEx hospital discharge and subsequent hospital admission requiring IV antimicrobials. Odds of antimicrobial switching ≥5 days after treatment initiation were determined by generalized linear mixed models, and associations between AST and time to next PEx were studied using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards regression. ResultsAST occurred in 2518 (39%) of 6451 PEx at 36 hospitals and was associated with increased odds of antimicrobial switching (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.16–1.52; p = 0.001) and increased hazard of future PEx (HR 1.32, 95% CI 1.16–1.50; p < 0.001). However, antimicrobial switching was not associated with a longer time to next PEx. ConclusionsAST was associated with both increased probability of antimicrobial regimen change and increased PEx hazard. There was no evidence that antimicrobial regimen change was associated with clinical benefit as assessed by time to next PEx. However, these results indicate residual indication bias remained after adjustment for available disease covariates. Additional studies of the clinical value of AST are warranted.

Correspondence between lung function and symptom measures from the Cystic Fibrosis Respiratory Symptom Diary–Chronic Respiratory Infection Symptom Score (CFRSD-CRISS)

BackgroundPulmonary exacerbations (PEx) in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients reduce quality of life. Lung function, measured by the percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s (ppFEV1), is widely used to evaluate PEx treatments. We analyzed the correspondence of ppFEV1 with 8 patient-reported symptom-based questions from the Cystic Fibrosis Respiratory Symptom Diary–Chronic Respiratory Infection Symptom Score (CFRSD-CRISS). MethodsData were derived from the observational Standardized Treatment of Pulmonary Exacerbations (STOP) study. CF patients who had CFRSD-CRISS and ppFEV1 measurements on ≥2 timepoints were included: 1) day of initial PEx, 2) 7 days later, and/or 3) end of PEx. We calculated age-stratified Spearman correlation coefficients and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) between the change in ppFEV1 and change in CFRSD-CRISS items from index to day 7 and from index to the end of PEx treatment. ResultsLung function and symptom scores improved by the end of treatment; however, correlations between ppFEV1 and the specific CFRSD-CRISS measures were mostly weak to moderate. An exception was that among patients <18, we observed moderately strong correlations between changes in ppFEV1 and cough severity (r = −0.58 (95% CI: −0.80, −0.21)), mucus quantity (r = −0.51 (−0.77, −0.11)), and wheezing (r = −0.53 (−0.78, −0.14)) from index until end of treatment. ConclusionsAs novel treatments are developed for PEx, it is important to ensure that improvement is measured meaningfully. The generally weak associations between patient-reported symptoms and ppFEV1 that we found suggest that these measures capture different aspects of the disease and both metrics are important when evaluating new treatments.

Optimizing Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate to Support Adult to Pediatric Pharmacokinetic Bridging Studies in Patients with Cystic Fibrosis.

The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is often used to model drug clearance (CL) and scale doses across age and body size. Over their lifetime, patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) receive repeated courses of tobramycin, an antibiotic with eGFR-dependent CL, for the treatment of pulmonary exacerbations. Tobramycin population pharmacokinetic (PK) modeling can be used to decipher the best approach to define eGFR for pediatric bridging studies. Inpatients with CF who received intravenous tobramycin between 1 January 2006 and 30 May 2018 were eligible for inclusion. Encounters without tobramycin concentration measurement or missing covariate data were excluded. Population PK analysis was performed using NONMEM.Covariate models were built following identification of the base model, with specific emphasis on the effect of different methods of estimating renal function as a covariate of tobramycin CL. A total of 296 CF patients contributed 1029 care encounters (420 pediatric, 609 adult) and 4352 tobramycin concentrations to this analysis. The median (minimum, maximum) age at encounter was 19years (0.2, 60), with serum creatinine of 0.60mg/dL (0.10, 3.41). A two-compartment model best described the observed data, with height and eGFR as significant covariates of tobramycin CL. eGFR was best modeled using a combination of the modified Schwartz and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKDEPI) equations expressed in absolute units. The CKDEPI equation bridges PK data generated in adults to adolescents with CF better than the current regulatory standard. The eGFR should be expressed in absolute units (mL/min) for PK analyses.

Trial Refresh: A Case for an Adaptive Platform Trial for Pulmonary Exacerbations of Cystic Fibrosis.

Cystic fibrosis is a genetic disease typically characterized by progressive lung damage and premature mortality. Pulmonary exacerbations, or flare-ups of the lung disease, often require hospitalization for intensive treatment. Approximately 25% of patients with cystic fibrosis do not recover their baseline lung function after pulmonary exacerbations. There is a relative paucity of evidence to inform treatment strategies for exacerbations. Compounding this lack of evidence, there are a large number of treatment options already as well as becoming available. This results in significant variability between medication regimens prescribed by different physicians, treatment centers and regions with potentially adverse impact to patients. The conventional strategy is to undertake essential randomized clinical trials to inform treatment decisions and improve outcomes for patients with exacerbations. However, over the past several decades, clinical trials have generally failed to provide information critical to improved treatment and management of exacerbations. Bayesian adaptive platform trials hold the promise of addressing clinical uncertainties and informing treatment. Using modeling and response adaptive randomization, they allow for the evaluation of multiple treatments across different management domains, and progressive improvement in patient outcomes throughout the course of the trial. Bayesian adaptive platform trials require substantial amounts of preparation. Basic preparation includes extensive stakeholder involvement including elicitation of consumer preferences and clinician understanding of the research topic, defining the research questions, determining the best outcome measures, delineating study sub-groups, in depth statistical modeling, designing end-to-end digital solutions seamlessly supporting clinicians, researchers and patients, constructing randomisation algorithms and importantly, defining pre-determined intra-study end-points. This review will discuss the motivation and necessary steps required to embark on a Bayesian adaptive platform trial to optimize medication regimens for the treatment of pulmonary exacerbations of cystic fibrosis.

The renoprotective effect of concomitant fosfomycin in the treatment of pulmonary exacerbations in cystic fibrosis.

BackgroundFosfomycin, effective in Cystic Fibrosis (CF), competes with aminoglycosides at renal binding sites and may therefore afford a renoprotective effect when used in combination therapy. We explored this by using markers of acute renal tubular damage [N-acetyl-β-d-glucose-aminidase (NAG), alanine amino-peptidase (AAP) and β2-microglobulin].Methods Using a prospective randomized crossover trial design, at an acute pulmonary exacerbation, 18 adult CF patients received either 14 days of intravenous (IV) tobramycin or IV tobramycin and IV fosfomycin, both in combination with a second IV antibiotic (colomycin).Results Urinary NAG (P = 0.003) and AAP (P = 0.03) following treatment with concomitant fosfomycin were lower than those after treatment with tobramycin and colomycin alone. Fosfomycin attenuated the total 24-h urinary protein leak (P = 0.0001). The 14-day improvements in all surrogate markers of exacerbation resolution (FEV1% predicted, FVC, white cell count and C-reactive protein) were similar for both treatment regimens.Conclusion The addition of fosfomycin reduces acute renal injury caused by IV aminoglycoside therapy in CF pulmonary exacerbations.

Decreased Fecal Calprotectin Levels in Cystic Fibrosis Patients After Antibiotic Treatment for Respiratory Exacerbation.

In all patients with cystic fibrosis (CF), gastrointestinal (GI) tract CF transmembrane conductance regulator dysfunction occurs early in life. The identical pathophysiological triad of obstruction, infection, and inflammation causes disease of the airways and in the intestinal tract (CF enteropathy). Mucus accumulation within GI tract is a niche for abnormal microbial colonization, leading to dysbiosis. Fecal calprotectin (FC) is a neutrophil cytosolic protein released during apoptosis and necrosis and reflects inflammatory status. Systemic antibiotic treatment for pulmonary exacerbations has been shown to improve systemic inflammatory markers and serum and sputum calprotectin. Antibiotic treatment aimed at pulmonary complaints may improve GI tract inflammatory status. We hypothesized that high levels of FC present during pulmonary exacerbation are due, in part, to multiorgan dysbiosis and thus should diminish with systemic antibiotic treatment. This prospective pilot study enrolled 14 patients with CF, with no current GI symptoms. FC levels and lung function were measured at the beginning and end of systemic antibiotic treatment. Compared to preantibiotic treatment baseline values, end of treatment FC levels declined significantly after antibiotic treatment, P = 0.004 and similarly, there was significant improvement in forced expiratory volume in 1 second, P = 0.002. High levels of FC during respiratory exacerbation may reflect a systemic exacerbation rather than solely pulmonary. Antibiotic treatment lowered the FC levels possibly by its impact on the intestinal microbiome.

Optimizing outcomes of pulmonary exacerbations in cystic fibrosis.

Pulmonary exacerbations are described as worsening of the daily symptoms of cystic fibrosis airways disease, typically with increased cough and sputum production. There are often associated signs such as weight loss and reduced lung function. These events occur frequently and are associated with considerable cost and morbidity. Although approved maintenance therapies are shown to reduce exacerbations, they still occur and are associated with poor outcomes despite treatment. Guidelines to define best practices found a paucity of evidence upon which to base recommendations. There are ongoing studies that are trying to build the evidence upon which to improve our practice. Antibiotics remain a core aspect of treatment, but there is high variance in practice patterns including selection of antibiotics and duration of therapy. In addition, there is a discordance between antibiotic susceptibility test results and clinical outcomes, suggesting we need better approaches to guide antibiotic selection. Treatment durations are highly variable but recent evidence has demonstrated worse outcomes with shorter durations; longer durations may be associated with complications of treatment, suggesting an optimal duration could be identified. New studies aim to define best practices to improve outcomes with treatment of pulmonary exacerbations.

Inhaled antibiotics for pulmonary exacerbations in cystic fibrosis

Cystic fibrosis is a genetic disorder in which abnormal mucus in the lungs is associated with susceptibility to persistent infection. Pulmonary exacerbations are when symptoms of infection become more severe. Antibiotics are an essential part of treatment for exacerbations and inhaled antibiotics may be used alone or in conjunction with oral antibiotics for milder exacerbations or with intravenous antibiotics for more severe infections. Inhaled antibiotics do not cause the same adverse effects as intravenous antibiotics and may prove an alternative in people with poor access to their veins. This is an update of a previously published review. To determine if treatment of pulmonary exacerbations with inhaled antibiotics in people with cystic fibrosis improves their quality of life, reduces time off school or work and improves their long-term survival. We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis Group's Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register. Date of the last search: 03 October 2018.We searched ClinicalTrials.gov, the Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry and WHO ICTRP for relevant trials. Date of last search: 09 October 2018. Randomised controlled trials in people with cystic fibrosis with a pulmonary exacerbation in whom treatment with inhaled antibiotics was compared to placebo, standard treatment or another inhaled antibiotic for between one and four weeks. Two review authors independently selected eligible trials, assessed the risk of bias in each trial and extracted data. They assessed the quality of the evidence using the GRADE criteria. Authors of the included trials were contacted for more information. Four trials with 167 participants are included in the review. Two trials (77 participants) compared inhaled antibiotics alone to intravenous antibiotics alone and two trials (90 participants) compared a combination of inhaled and intravenous antibiotics to intravenous antibiotics alone. Trials were heterogenous in design and two were only available in abstract form. Risk of bias was difficult to assess in most trials, but for all trials we judged there to be a high risk from lack of blinding and an unclear risk with regards to randomisation. Results were not fully reported and only limited data were available for analysis.Inhaled antibiotics alone versus intravenous antibiotics aloneOnly one trial (n = 18) reported a perceived improvement in lifestyle (quality of life) in both groups (very low-quality of evidence). Neither trial reported on time off work or school. Both trials measured lung function, but there was no difference reported between treatment groups (very low-quality evidence). With regards to our secondary outcomes, one trial (n = 18) reported no difference in the need for additional antibiotics and the second trial (n = 59) reported on the time to next exacerbation. In neither case was a difference between treatments identified (both very low-quality evidence). The single trial (n = 18) measuring adverse events and sputum microbiology did not observe any in either treatment group for either outcome (very low-quality evidence).Inhaled antibiotics plus intravenous antibiotics versus intravenous antibiotics aloneNeither trial reported on quality of life or time off work or school. Both trials measured lung function, but found no difference between groups in forced expiratory volume in one second (one trial, n = 28, very low-quality evidence) or vital capacity (one trial, n = 62). Neither trial reported on the need for additional antibiotics or the time to the next exacerbation; however, one trial (n = 28) reported on hospital admissions and found no difference between groups. Both trials reported no difference between groups in adverse events (very low-quality evidence) and one trial (n = 62) reported no difference in the emergence of antibiotic-resistant organisms (very low-quality evidence). There is little useful high-level evidence to judge the effectiveness of inhaled antibiotics for the treatment of pulmonary exacerbations in people with cystic fibrosis. The included trials were not sufficiently powered to achieve their goals. Hence, we are unable to demonstrate whether one treatment was superior to the other or not. Further research is needed to establish whether inhaled tobramycin may be used as an alternative to intravenous tobramycin for some pulmonary exacerbations.