Primary Treatment For Prostate Cancer Research Articles

Long-term Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction Following Salvage Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Modern Perspective

Background and objectiveApproximately two-thirds of men who undergo primary treatment for prostate cancer (PC) will experience biochemical recurrence (BCR). Salvage robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (sRARP) offers curative treatment in this disease setting and men who choose this option may avoid palliative androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). The purpose of this study was to describe long-term outcomes and patient feedback following sRARP. MethodsWe reviewed data for consecutive men with biopsy-proven localized BCR who underwent sRARP and pelvic lymph node dissection at a single tertiary referral center between 2004 and 2021. Perioperative data, Clavien-Dindo complications, and functional outcomes were recorded. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate prostate-specific antigen–free (≥0.2 ng/ml) survival (PSAFS) and metastasis-free survival (MFS). Three Likert-type items (score 1-5) from the validated Surgical Satisfaction Questionnaire-8 were distributed to patients postoperatively. Key findings and limitationsWe included 78 men, of whom 72 (92%) had undergone primary radiotherapy and six (8%) had received primary prostate ablation. Median follow-up was 10.1 yr (interquartile range 5.8–12.4). Final pathology identified ≥pT3N0M0 in 35 patients (45%) and positive margins in 23 (29%). The overall complication rate was 50%. Of the 26 (33%) major (grade ≥III) complications, anastomotic stricture (32%) was most common. The estimated 3-, 5-, and 10-yr survival rates were 85.6% and 80.2%, 83.5% for PSAFS (n = 11), and 74.1%, 83.5%, and 70.5% for MFS (n = 23), respectively. At last follow-up, postoperative ADT had been administered to 17 patients (22%), and 39 men (50%) remained alive a decade after sRARP. Continence and potency were maintained in 33/62 (53%) and 1/16 (6%) patients, respectively. Thirty-five respondents (45%) reported median questionnaire scores (≥4) in favor of sRARP. Limitations include the small single-center series and a single query point for patient feedback. Conclusions and clinical implicationsLong-term outcomes of sRARP suggest that the technical challenges and morbidity of the procedure are qualified by patient feedback and the opportunity to evade the morbidity and mortality of biochemically recurrent PC. Patient summaryWe reviewed the cancer outcomes and side effects of robot-assisted surgical removal of the prostate after treatment failure with radiation or ablation for prostate cancer. We found that this type of treatment has substantial risks and long-term side effects, but the surgery provides an opportunity to cure prostate cancer and/or avoid the consequences of indefinite hormonal treatment. Overall, most men who underwent this surgery were not disappointed with their decision despite the higher risks and consequences.

Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Focus on Cognitive Function and Mood.

Prostate cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in men in the United States. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is currently the primary treatment for metastatic prostate cancer, and some studies have shown that the use of anti-androgen drugs is related to a reduction in cognitive function, mood changes, diminished quality of life, dementia, and possibly Alzheimer's disease. ADT has potential physiological effects such as a reduction in white matter integrity and a negative impact on hypothalamic functions due to the lowering of testosterone levels or the blockade of downstream androgen receptor signaling by first- and second-generation anti-androgen drugs. A comparative analysis of prostate cancer patients undergoing ADT and Alzheimer patients identified over 30 shared genes, illustrating common ground for the mechanistic underpinning of the symptomatology. The purpose of this review was to investigate the effects of ADT on cognitive function, mood, and quality of life, as well as to analyze the relationship between ADT and Alzheimer's disease. The evaluation of prostate cancer patient cognitive ability via neurocognitive testing is described. Future studies should further explore the connection among cognitive deficits, mood disturbances, and the physiological changes that occur when hormonal balance is altered.

Evaluation of Recurrent Disease after Radiation Therapy for Patients Considering Local Salvage Therapy: Past vs. Contemporary Management.

Recurrent prostate cancer after primary treatment with radiation therapy is a common problem. Patients with localized recurrence may benefit from salvage therapy, but careful patient selection is crucial because not all patients will benefit from local salvage therapy, and salvage therapy has increased morbidity compared to primary treatments for prostate cancer. This review aims to provide an overview of the evaluation of patients with recurrent disease after radiation therapy and how it is continuing to evolve with increasing data on outcomes, as well as improving technologies and techniques. Our enhanced understanding of treatment outcomes and risk stratification has influenced the identification of patients who may benefit from local salvage treatment. Advances in imaging and biopsy techniques have enhanced the accuracy of locating the recurrence, which affects treatment decisions. Additionally, the growing interest in image-targeted ablative therapies that have less morbidity and complications than whole-gland therapies for suitable patients influences the evaluation process for those considering focal salvage therapy. Although significant changes have been made in the diagnostic evaluation of patients with recurrent disease after radiation therapy, it remains unclear whether these changes will ultimately improve patient outcomes.

Exploring Men's Experiences with Follow-Up Care following Primary Treatment for Prostate Cancer in Atlantic Canada: A Qualitative Study.

Prostate cancer is a common and life-altering condition among Canadian men, yet little is known about how follow-up care is provided to those who have completed treatment. Despite improving survival rates, survivors experience ongoing needs and are often not provided with support to manage them. This study sought to investigate the post-treatment experiences and needs of prostate cancer survivors and to determine if and how these needs are being met. Using a qualitative description design, prostate cancer survivors who had completed treatment took part in semi-structured interviews. The interviews were recorded and analyzed thematically. The participants experienced varying levels of satisfaction with their follow-up care. While primary care providers played significant roles, continuity of care and specialist involvement varied. Most participants felt unprepared to manage the long-term effects of their cancer due to a lack of information and resources from their healthcare providers. Instead, participants turned to their peers for support. Ongoing physical and psychosocial needs went unmet and had significant impacts on their daily lives. Participants felt that support for these issues should be automatically integrated into their follow-up care. In summary, this study revealed the importance of integrated, patient-centered follow-up care for prostate cancer in Atlantic Canada.

Prediction of biochemical recurrence after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

BackgroundRadical prostatectomy (RP) has been considered primary treatment for localized prostate cancer. Biochemical recurrence (BCR) occur approximately 20–30% in five year after RP. We aim to develop a novel nomogram to predict BCR-free survival (BCRFS) and performed external validation using a validation cohort that may help clinicians to make better decision for tailoring adjuvant treatment to specific group of patients.Materials and methodsThis retrospective cohort study included 370 localized and regional prostate cancer patients who underwent laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) in Songklanagarind hospital between January 2010 and December 2019, the patients were divided into two groups (primary cohort and validation cohort). BCR-free survival was created using Kaplan-Meier curve. Predictive factors for BCR were identified with univariable and multivariable analysis using Cox proportional hazards model. Predictive nomogram was created using these identified factors and developed for the prediction of biochemical recurrence free survival (BCRFS) at 1 and 5 years after LRP.ResultsFor primary Songklanagarind cohort, BCR was found in 105 patients (44.7%). Overall 1-year BCR-free survival was 52.8%, and 5-year BCR-free survival was 45.7% with median time to BCR of 18.1 months. Multivariable analysis identified unfavorable factor to BCRRF which are high initial serum PSA (> 20) (p < 0.001; HR 3.2), ISUP Gleason grade group > = 3 (p 0.033; HR 2.2), positive surgical margins (p 0.046; HR 1.5), and seminal vesicle involvement (p < 0.001; HR 5.2) and using for develop a novel nomogram to predict BCR. Concordance index 0.78.ConclusionProstate cancer patients with unfavorable factors, including high initial PSA (> 20), ISUP Gleason grade group > = 3, positive margin and extra-prostatic tumor extension are considered high risks and independent predictors of biochemical recurrence. This predictive models could potentially improve the 1 and 5-year BCR prediction after RP, according to the study’s findings and will aid medical professionals in achieving the goal of clinical prediction and creating a proper management for the localized treatment of prostate cancer underwent laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

The heterogeneity and clonal evolution analysis of the advanced prostate cancer with castration resistance

BackgroundNowadays, the incidence rate of advanced and metastatic prostate cancer at the first time of diagnosis grows higher in China yearly. At present, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is the primary treatment of advanced prostate cancer. However, after several years of ADT, most patients will ultimately progress to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Previous studies mainly focus on Caucasian and very few on East Asian patients.MethodsIn this study, the pre- and post-ADT tumor samples were collected from five Chinese patients with advanced prostate cancer. The whole-exome sequencing, tumor heterogeneity, and clonal evolution pattern were analyzed.ResultsThe results showed that the gene mutation pattern and heterogeneity changed significantly after androgen deprivation therapy. Tumor Mutational Burden (TMB) and Copy Number Alteration (CNA) were substantially reduced in the post-treatment group, but the Mutant-allele tumor heterogeneity (MATH), Socio-Demographic Index (SDI), Intratumor heterogeneity (ITH), and weighted Genome Instability Index (wGII) had no significant difference. According to the clone types and characteristics, the presence of main clones in five pre-and post-treatment samples, the clonal evolution pattern can be further classified into two sub-groups (the Homogeneous origin clonal model or the Heterogeneous origin clonal model). The Progression-free survival (PFS) of the patients with the “Homogeneous origin clonal model” was shorter than the “Heterogeneous origin clonal model”. The longer PFS might relate to MUC7 and MUC5B mutations repaired. ZNF91 mutation might be responsible for resistance to ADT resistance.ConclusionOur findings revealed potential genetic regulators to predict the castration resistance and provide insights into the castration resistance processes in advanced prostate cancer. The crosstalk between clonal evolution patterns and tumor microenvironment may also play a role in castration resistance. A multicenter-research including larger populations with different background are needed to confirm our conclusion in the future.

Biochemical Recurrence and Risk of Mortality Following Radiotherapy or Radical Prostatectomy

Stratifying patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR) after primary treatment for prostate cancer based on the risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) is essential for determining the need for further testing and treatments. To evaluate the association of BCR after radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy and its current risk stratification with PCSM. This population-based cohort study included a total of 16 311 male patients with 10 364 (64%) undergoing radical prostatectomy and 5947 (36%) undergoing radiotherapy with curative intent (cT1-3, cM0) and PSA follow-up in Stockholm, Sweden, between 2003 and 2019. Follow-up for all patients was until death, emigration, or end of the study (ie, December 31, 2018). Data were analyzed between September 2022 and March 2023. Primary outcomes of the study were the cumulative incidence of BCR and PCSM. Patients with BCR were stratified in low- and high-risk according to European Association of Urology (EAU) criteria. Radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy. A total of 16 311 patients were included. Median (IQR) age was 64 (59-68) years in the radical prostatectomy cohort (10 364 patients) and 69 (64-73) years in the radiotherapy cohort (5947 patients). Median (IQR) follow-up for survivors was 88 (55-138) months and 89 (53-134) months, respectively. Following radical prostatectomy, the 15-year cumulative incidences of BCR were 16% (95% CI, 15%-18%) for the 4024 patients in the low D'Amico risk group, 30% (95% CI, 27%-32%) for the 5239 patients in the intermediate D'Amico risk group, and 46% (95% CI, 42%-51%) for 1101 patients in the high D'Amico risk group. Following radiotherapy, the 15-year cumulative incidences of BCR were 18% (95% CI, 15%-21%) for the 1230 patients in the low-risk group, 24% (95% CI, 21%-26%) for the 2355 patients in the intermediate-risk group, and 36% (95% CI, 33%-39%) for the 2362 patients in the high-risk group. The 10-year cumulative incidences of PCSM after radical prostatectomy were 4% (95% CI, 2%-6%) for the 1101 patients who developed low-risk EAU-BCR and 9% (95% CI, 5%-13%) for 649 patients who developed high-risk EAU-BCR. After radiotherapy, the 10-year PCSM cumulative incidences were 24% (95% CI, 19%-29%) for the 591 patients in the low-risk EAU-BCR category and 46% (95% CI, 40%-51%) for the 600 patients in the high-risk EAU-BCR category. These findings suggest the validity of EAU-BCR stratification system. However, while the risk of dying from prostate cancer in low-risk EAU-BCR after radical prostatectomy was very low, patients who developed low-risk EAU-BCR after radiotherapy had a nonnegligible risk of prostate cancer mortality. Improving risk stratification of patients with BCR is pivotal to guide salvage treatment decisions, reduce overtreatment, and limit the number of staging tests in the event of PSA elevations after primary treatment.

Association Between Common Urologic Medications and Onset of Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias in Men With Prostate Cancer Managed by Different Primary Treatment Modalities

To understand the relationship between common urologic medications phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (PDE5i) and anticholinergics (AC) and risk of dementia onset in men who underwent different primary treatments for prostate cancer. Patients (>50years) with prostate cancer (1998-2022) without Alzheimer's disease or related dementias were selected from Cancer of the Prostatic Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor Registry. Minimum medication use was 3months. Fine-Gray regression was performed to determine the association between medication exposure and dementia onset ≥12months after primary treatment in men matched on age, race, comorbid conditions, smoking, and type of clinical site, with competing risk of death. Among 5937 men (53% PDE5i; 14% AC), PDE5i users were younger (63 vs 70, P<.01) with less CAD, CVA, DM (all P<.01); AC users were older (68 vs 66, P<.01) with higher incidence of comorbidities (P<.01). Median months of use was 24.3 (IQR 12.1, 48.7) for PDE5i and 12.2 (IQR 6.1, 24.3) for AC users. Cumulative incidence of Alzheimer's disease or related dementias was 6.5% at 15years. PDE5i (P=.07) and AC (P=.06) were not associated with dementia regardless of primary treatment modality. In this retrospective cohort study, PDE5i and AC use do not appear independently associated with risk of dementia. Notably, our cohort was generally healthy and younger which may limit our ability to detect significance. We recommend prospective investigation into association between PDE5i and dementia and advise continued judicious stewardship of AC in older patient populations.

Radical cystectomy in bladder cancer patients previously treated for prostate cancer: Insights from a large European multicentric series

IntroductionPrevious radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer (PCa) might impair feasibility of radical cystectomy (RC) for bladder cancer (BCa). The current study addressed morbidity, operative time (OT), and length of stay (LOS) of RC, within the largest available series of patients with history of previous RP. Materials and methodsAll patients previously submitted to RP for PCa and subsequently submitted to RC for BCa, at six high-volume European institutions between 2010 and 2019, were identified. Presence of either PCa or BCa metastases, RT as primary treatment for PCa, and palliative RC represented exclusion criteria.The quality criteria for accurate and comprehensive reporting of intra- and post-operative surgical outcomes, recommended by the European Association of Urology guidelines, were fulfilled. Multivariable logistic and Poisson regression analyses were performed. ResultsOverall, 140 RC patients with history of RP were identified. After RP, 69 (49%) patients received radiotherapy (RT) for PCa, either in adjuvant (n = 50, 36%) or salvage setting (n = 19, 13%). Median age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index was 6 (IQR 5, 7). Median OT, estimated blood loss and LOS were, respectively, 300 min, 500 ml, and 16 days. Intra-operative transfusions rate was 47% (n = 65). One intra-operative complication occurred (EAUiaiC grade 2, perforation of the rectum managed with immediate repair). Eighty-two (59%) patients experienced a total of 107 post-operative complications during the hospital stay, and seven (5%) patients required hospital readmission. In multivariable regression analyses, RT for PCa was associated with higher risk of post-operative complications (odds ratio 1.82, p = 0.039), longer OT (incidence rate ratio 1.09, p < 0.001), and longer LOS (incidence rate ratio 1.24, p < 0.001). ConclusionsRC in patients with history of RP is feasible, albeit burdened by remarkable morbidity, even in centers of excellence. RT after RP for PCa portends worse surgical outcomes.

Decomposing racial differences in financial hardship among older cancer survivors.

6598 Background: Despite Medicare coverage, financial hardship is a prevalent issue among older cancer survivors, particularly among those belonging to a racial/ethnic minority. Sociodemographic, clinical, and area-level factors may mediate this relationship; however, no studies have assessed the extent to which these factors contribute to disparities. Methods: Surveys assessing financial hardship after cancer were completed by 721 patients age 65y+ of Black or white race completing primary cancer treatment for breast, prostate, colorectal, prostate cancer or lymphoma at University of Alabama at Birmingham between 2000 and 2019. Financial hardship included material, psychological, and behavioral domains. Material hardship included ever 1) borrowing money/going into debt, 2) filed for bankruptcy, 3) worried about paying large medical bills, and 4) made any other financial sacrifices due to cancer. Psychological hardship was measured by asking if participants were ever worried about paying large medical bills related to cancer, its treatment or effects of treatment. Behavioral hardship was measured by asking if participants were unable or delayed in obtaining medical care, tests, treatments or prescriptions in the last 6 months. Non-linear Blinder-Oaxaca effect decomposition methods evaluated the extent to which individual-level sociodemographic, clinical, and area-level factors contributed to racial disparities in financial hardship. Results: Median age at survey was 78 (IQR = 73-82), majority were female (53%) and non-Hispanic White (84%). The most common cancers were breast (34%) and prostate (27%), followed by lung (17%), lymphoma (9%) and colorectal (14%). Ninety percent were diagnosed at an early stage and median time from diagnosis to survey was 8y (IQR = 5-12). There were no significant clinical differences between Black and white patients. Overall, 22% reported any financial hardship; 14% material, 3% behavioral, and 14% psychological. Black, compared to White participants reported significantly (p &lt; 0.001) higher rates of overall (39% v 18%), material (29% v 11%), and psychological (27% v 11%) financial hardship. Notably, Black patients had higher rates of being unable to cover cancer-related costs (23% v 7%), worrying about paying large medical bills (27% v 11%), and having to borrow money or go into debt (9% v 3%). Overall, the observed characteristics explained 81% of racial differences in financial hardship among cancer survivors, primarily by differences in income (24%), cancer diagnosis and stage (22%), and area deprivation (15%). Conclusions: These results identify primary contributors to racial disparities in financial hardship among older cancer survivors, which can be used to develop interventions aimed at eliminating inferior healthcare outcomes experienced by certain racial groups, inform policy, and allocate resources to those at greatest risk for financial hardship.

LDR brachytherapy offers superior tumor control to single-fraction HDR prostate brachytherapy: A prospective study.

To compare the clinical outcomes of single-fraction high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy and single-fraction low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy as the sole treatment for primary prostate cancer. A quasi-randomized study that allocated, from March 2008 to February 2012, 129 low and intermediate risk prostate cancer patients to one single-fraction HDR of 19 Gy (61 patients) or to a 145 Gy 125 I LDR permanent implant (68 patients. Biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis. After a median follow-up of 72 months in the HDR group, 26 patients relapsed, and after a median follow-up of 84 months in the LDR group, 7 patients relapsed (p < 0.0001). The 5-year bRFS was significantly better for the LDR group than for the HDR group (93.7% and 61.1%, respectively) (p < 0.0001). The 5-year OS also was significantly better in the LDR group (95.5% vs. 89.9%) (p = 0.0436). Permanent LDR prostate implant brachytherapy offers better clinical outcomes than single-fraction HDR for prostate cancer.

Climacturia and Penile Length Shortening: Adverse Outcomes following Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.

Purpose: While erectile dysfunction and urinary incontinence are commonly cited side effects following radical prostatectomy (RP), climacturia and penile length shortening are less explored. The present study seeks to explore the incidence, risk factors, and predictors of recovery associated with climacturia and penile length shortening following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Patients and Methods: From September 2018 to January 2020, 800 patients underwent RARP for primary treatment of localized prostate cancer. A survey was sent to patients following 1-year follow-up assessing outcomes of continence, erectile dysfunction, climacturia, and penile length shortening. Descriptive statistics were utilized to describe incidence and risk factors and logistic regression modeling was used to identify predictors associated with recovery. Results: Of the 800 patients surveyed, 339 (42%) and 369 (46%) patients responded, with 127/339 (37.5%) and 216/369 (58.5%) endorsing climacturia and penile length shortening. In univariate analysis, a lack of bilateral nerve sparing was associated with climacturia; high body mass index (BMI), high prostate weight, lack of nerve-sparing, and high pathologic stage was associated with penile length shortening. In logistic regression modeling, BMI, prostate weight, and p-stage were all significantly correlated with penile length shortening. Recovery from climacturia was associated with a preoperative International Index of Erectile Function-5 score >21. When patients were asked to rank the importance of these outcomes compared to erectile dysfunction and incontinence, <5% of patients ranked either climacturia or penile length shortening as a high priority following RP. Conclusion: While incidence of climacturia and penile length shortening following RP is significant, impact on patient- and partner-related quality of life are low in comparison to risks of erectile dysfunction and urinary incontinence.

MP54-01 ASSOCIATION BETWEEN SOCIAL NEEDS AND PRIMARY TREATMENT CHOICE FOR LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER

You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 Apr 2023MP54-01 ASSOCIATION BETWEEN SOCIAL NEEDS AND PRIMARY TREATMENT CHOICE FOR LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER Jay Rollins, Rutul D. Patel, Kevin Labagnara, and Kara L. Watts Jay RollinsJay Rollins More articles by this author , Rutul D. PatelRutul D. Patel More articles by this author , Kevin LabagnaraKevin Labagnara More articles by this author , and Kara L. WattsKara L. Watts More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003307.01AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Social Determinants of Health (SDH)–defined as the conditions where people are born, work, live, and age–impact patients’ access to resources and health outcomes in a variety of ways. Additionally, ethnic differences in primary treatment for prostate cancer have been demonstrated. We assessed the relationship between SDH score and primary treatment choice for localized prostate cancer in a diverse, urban patient population. METHODS: Using our institutional registry, we conducted a retrospective study of men diagnosed with prostate cancer between 2003–2022. Primary treatment choice–defined as either radiation therapy (RT) or radical prostatectomy (RP)–was abstracted with clinical variables. A validated SDH questionnaire, distributed over the past 5 years by our institution’s primary care department, provided self-reported demographics and patients’ concerns regarding specific social risks. Multivariable analyses controlling for age, PSA, and Gleason grade group at diagnosis were performed to analyze the association between SDH variables and primary treatment choice for localized prostate cancer. RESULTS: 217 patients completed the SDH questionnaire and met inclusion criteria; 118 (54%) and 99 (46%) received primary RT and RP, respectively. Median age was 64 years. The cohort was primarily non-Hispanic Black (43%) or Hispanic (41%), English-speaking (80%), and insured through Medicare (65%). Table 1 reports the results of binomial logistic regression models assessing the relationship between the variables of interest and primary treatment selection. Compared to White patients, patients of all other races/ethnicities were more likely to undergo prostatectomy (Non-Hispanic Black OR=9.54, p=0.04; Hispanic OR=9.55, p=0.04; Asian/Other OR=13.87, p=0.03). No specific SDH concern endorsed by patients was significantly associated with treatment choice (p>0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of our cohort indicates that unmet social needs do not influence primary treatment selection for localized prostate cancer. This suggests the presence of other variables that contribute to racial/ethnic differences in treatment choice. Future studies are needed to investigate the social and cultural factors that influence how patients determine primary treatment for localized prostate cancer. Source of Funding: None © 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 209Issue Supplement 4April 2023Page: e753 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Jay Rollins More articles by this author Rutul D. Patel More articles by this author Kevin Labagnara More articles by this author Kara L. Watts More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...

MP54-03 THE EFFECT OF DUAL ELIGIBILITY ON ACCESS TO CARE IN PATIENTS WITH NEWLY DIAGNOSED PROSTATE CANCER

You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 Apr 2023MP54-03 THE EFFECT OF DUAL ELIGIBILITY ON ACCESS TO CARE IN PATIENTS WITH NEWLY DIAGNOSED PROSTATE CANCER Kassem Faraj, Rodney Dunn, Brent Hollenbeck, and Lindsey Herrel Kassem FarajKassem Faraj More articles by this author , Rodney DunnRodney Dunn More articles by this author , Brent HollenbeckBrent Hollenbeck More articles by this author , and Lindsey HerrelLindsey Herrel More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003307.03AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Dual eligible beneficiaries are a particularly vulnerable population, as they qualify for Medicare due to age and Medicaid due to low income. Though some dual eligible beneficiaries have access to additional social services, such as transportation coverage, others do not qualify for these services (i.e. partial dual eligibility). This heterogeneity in support services may impact access to treatment for dual eligible men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer, a condition that necessitates timely, repeated interactions with the healthcare system. METHODS: We performed a cohort study of Medicare beneficiaries who were diagnosed with prostate cancer between 2015 and 2019. Beneficiaries were required to have 12-months of eligibility before and after diagnosis date. We compared pre-diagnosis testing, post-diagnosis testing, and primary prostate cancer treatment between beneficiaries who have full dual-eligibility (full duals, “F”), partial dual-eligibility (partial duals, “P”) and those who are not dual-eligible (non-duals, “N”). RESULTS: In 138,785 men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer, 4,611 (3.3%) were full duals and 2,031 (1.5%) were partial duals. Full and partial duals (Figure 1) were more often of Black race than non-duals (p<0.001). Partial duals were less likely to have a PSA (p<0.001) or multiparametric MRI (p<0.001) prior to diagnosis, compared to both duals and non-duals. After diagnosis, full and partial duals less commonly underwent multiparametric MRI (F-17%, P-15%, N-24%, p<0.001) and more commonly underwent bone scan (F-43%, P-42%, N-33%, p<0.001) compared to non-duals. Regarding treatment (Figure 1), full and partial duals less commonly underwent surgery (F-12%, P-13%, N-20%) and more commonly received androgen deprivation therapy as a primary treatment (F-16%, P-13%, N-7%) compared to non-duals (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate disparities in access for dual-eligible beneficiaries before and after a new prostate cancer diagnosis. A more advanced stage at diagnosis may be reflected by the higher rates of bone scan testing and treatment with primary androgen deprivation therapy in the duals. A deeper understanding of barriers in access to prostate cancer screening and treatment is needed for this particularly vulnerable population. Source of Funding: This study is supported by funding from the National Cancer Institute Advanced Training in Urologic Oncology T32 Grant No T32CA180984 (Faraj) and by funding from the Prostate Cancer Foundation-Pfizer Health Equity Grant No K08CA237638 (Herrel) © 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 209Issue Supplement 4April 2023Page: e754 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Kassem Faraj More articles by this author Rodney Dunn More articles by this author Brent Hollenbeck More articles by this author Lindsey Herrel More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...

Status of 18F-PSMA-1007-PET/CT compared with multiparametric MRI in preoperative evaluation of prostate cancer.

Treatment of primary prostate cancer extremely depends on preoperative stage. The role of 18F-1007-PSMA-PET/CT in preoperative staging has not been well defined. Our aim was to compare the diagnostic performance of 18F-1007-PEMA-PET/CT, mpMRI, and mpMRI + PEMA-PET/CT in local progression and lymph node invasion of prostate cancer using histopathology as the gold standard. In this retrospective study, all patients with prostate cancer who underwent mpMRI and 18F-PSMA-1007-PET/CT before operation were included. The role of preoperative imaging was evaluated by predicting the sensitivity and specificity of EPE (extraprostatic extension), SVI (seminal vesicle invasion), and lymph node invasion results. Ultimately, 130 patients were included in this study. In the preoperative judgment of EPE and SVI, mpMRI + PSMA-PET/CT had higher sensitivity and specificity. When predicting lymph node metastasis, PSMA-PET/CT was the best choice. The accuracy of mpMRI + PSMA-PET/CT and PSMA-PET/CT in the T and N stages, respectively, was affected by the least factors. Based on the combined results of mpMRI and 18F-1007-PSMA-PET/CT, the accuracy of the preoperative judgment of prostatic capsule invasion can be improved, which may be conducive to developing intra-fascial technology while ensuring no tumor-touch isolation. PSMA-PET/CT has the advantages over mpMRI alone in terms of lymph node positivity. Compared with PSMA-PET/CT alone, the combined results can improve the sensitivity, but reduce specificity. Therefore, it is recommended to focus on PSMA-PET/CT to decide whether lymph node dissection should be performed.

Outcome of patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after PSMA PET/CT-directed radiotherapy or surgery without systemic therapy

BackgroundRadiotherapy (RT) and surgery are potential treatment options in patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR) following primary prostate cancer treatment. This study examines the value of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT)-informed surgery and RT in patients with BCR treated without systemic therapy.MethodsThis is a post-hoc subgroup analysis of a prospective clinical trial. Inclusion criteria were: histologically proven prostate cancer at initial curative-intent treatment, BCR after primary treatment with curative intent, having five or fewer lesions identified on [18F]DCFPyL PET/CT, and treatment with either PET/CT-directed RT or surgery without systemic therapy. The biochemical progression-free survival after PSMA ligand PET/CT-directed RT and surgery was determined. Uni- and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed for the association of patients’ characteristics, tumor-specific variables, and PSMA PET/CT imaging results with biochemical progression at the last follow-up.ResultsFifty-eight patients (30 in surgery and 28 in radiotherapy groups) met the inclusion criteria. A total of 87 PSMA-positive lesions were detected: 16 local recurrences (18.4%), 54 regional lymph nodes (62.1%), 6 distant lymph nodes (6,8%), and 11 osseous lesions (12.7%). A total of 85.7% (24 of 28) and 70.0% (21 of 30) of patients showed a ≥ 50% decrease in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels after RT and surgery, respectively. At a median follow-up time of 21 months (range, 6–32 months), the median biochemical progression-free survival was 19 months (range, 4 to 23 months) in the radiotherapy group, as compared with 16.5 months (range, 4 to 28 months) in the surgery group. On multivariate Cox regression analysis, the number of PSMA positive lesions (2–5 lesions compared to one lesion), and the anatomic location of the detected lesions (distant metastasis vs. local relapse and pelvic nodal relapse) significantly correlated with biochemical progression at the last follow-up, whereas other clinical, tumor-specific, and imaging parameters did not.ConclusionsThis study suggests that RT or surgery based on [18F]DCFPyL PET/CT are associated with high PSA response rates. The number and site of lesions detected on the PSMA PET/CT were predictive of biochemical progression on follow-up. Further studies are needed to assess the impact of targeting these sites on patient relevant outcomes.Trial registrationRegistered September 14, 2016; NCT02899312; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02899312

Predictors of Recurrence After Metastasis-directed Therapy in Oligorecurrent Prostate Cancer Following Radical Prostatectomy

BackgroundMetastasis-directed therapy (MDT) is performed to delay systemic treatments for oligorecurrent disease after primary prostate cancer (PCa) treatment. ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to identify the predictors of therapeutic response of MDT for oligorecurrent PCa. Design, setting, and participantsbicentric, retrospective study, including consecutive patients who underwent MDT for oligorecurrent PCa after radical prostatectomy (RP; 2006–2020) was conducted. MDT encompassed stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), salvage lymph node dissection (sLND), whole-pelvis/retroperitoneal radiation therapy (WP[R]RT), or metastasectomy. Outcome measurements and statistical analysisndpoints were 5-yr radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), palliative androgen deprivation treatment (pADT)-free survival, and overall survival (OS) together with prognostic factors for MFS following primary MDT. Survival outcomes were studied by Kaplan-Meier survival and univariable Cox regression (UVA). Results and limitationsA total of 211 MDT patients were included; 122 (58%) developed a secondary recurrence. Salvage lymph node dissection was performed in 119 (56%), SBRT in 48 (23%), and WP(R)RT in 31 (15%) of the cases. Two patients received sLND + SBRT and one received sLND + WPRT. Eleven (5%) patients received metastasectomies. The median follow-up since RP was 100 mo, while follow-up after MDT was 42 mo. The 5-yr rPFS, MFS, androgen deprivation treatment(–free survival, castration-resistant prostate cancer–free survival, CSS, and OS after MDT were 23%, 68%, 58%, 82%, 93%, and 87% respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between cN1 (n = 114) and cM+ (n = 97) for 5-yr MFS (83% vs 51%, p < 0.001), pADT-free survival (70% vs 49%, p = 0.014), and CSS (100% vs 86%, p = 0.019). UVA was performed to assess the risk factors (RFs) for MFS in cN1 and cM+. Alpha was set at 10%. RFs for MFS in cN1 were lower initial prostate-specific antigen (PSA) at the time of RP (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] 0.15 [0.02–1.02], p = 0.053], pN stage at RP (2.91 [0.83–10.24], p = 0.096), nonpersisting PSA after RP (0.47 [0.19–1.12], p = 0.089), higher PSA at primary MDT (2.38 [1.07–5.24], p = 0.032), and number of positive nodes on imaging (1.65 [1.14–2.40], p < 0.01). RFs for MFS in cM+ were higher pathological Gleason score (1.86 [0.93–3.73], p = 0.078), number of lesions on imaging (0.77 [0.57–1.04], p = 0.083), and cM1b/cM1c (non-nodal metastatic recurrence; 2.62 [1.58–4.34], p < 0.001). ConclusionsFollowing MDT, 23% of patients were free of a second recurrence at 5-yr follow-up. Moreover, cM+ patients had significantly worse outcomes in terms of MFS, pADT-free survival, and CSS. The RFs for a metastatic recurrence can be used for counseling patients, to inform prognosis, and potentially select candidates for MDT. Patient summaryIn this paper, we looked at the outcomes of using localized, patient-tailored treatment for imaging-detected recurrent prostate cancer in lymph nodes, bone, or viscera (maximum five recurrences on imaging). Our results showed that targeted treatment of the metastatic lesions could delay the premature use of hormone therapy.

Ability of STAR-CAP staging system to prognosticate risk of subsequent therapies after initial treatment of M0 prostate cancer.

310 Background: Given lower mortality rates and life expectancy loss in prostate cancer, treatment regimens must consider long-term outcomes with quality of life. Aggressiveness of treatment impacts severity of side effects and depends on the highly heterogeneous staging of the disease at onset. Staging and risk-classification systems have been developed, including STAR-CAP staging system which informs prognosis and could help with treatment intensification decisions. Compared with existing models such as the AJCC, STAR-CAP had superior performance and prognostic power for disease mortality prediction. However the risk of requiring subsequent therapies (ie salvage radiation therapy or androgen deprivation therapies after initial treatment) has not been described in STAR-CAP cohorts. Quantifying risk of subsequent therapies after initial therapies is clinically useful to help patients decide between various management strategies and whether monotherapies or multi-modality therapies may be sufficient. Methods: Patients who could be stratified by STAR-CAP system and underwent surgery or radiation therapy were identified from an institutional observational registry. Patients treated before 2010 were gathered retrospectively (n=835) and prospectively thereafter (n=2588). The primary endpoint was progression to additional therapy after primary treatment (radiation, surgery, or systemic therapy). Risk of progression accounting for STAR-CAP group was estimated using the Fine and Gray Competing risk model, with death as the competing risk. P&lt;0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: 3424 men diagnosed with prostate cancer underwent curative-intent treatment with surgery or radiation therapy (RT) between 1995 – 2022. The median age at diagnosis was 64.9 years (IQR 59.4 to 70.0); median follow-up time was 5.4 years. Patients with STAR-CAP 1A-1C had a statistically similar risk of requiring additional therapies, whereas those with 2A to 3B disease had a significantly and incrementally higher risk of requiring additional therapies (by group, hazard ratios and 95% CI: 2A, 1.8 (1.2 to 2.5); 2B, 2.9 (2.1 to 4.2); 2C, 3.4 (2.4 to 4.9); 3A, 5.7 (3.9 to 8.3); 3B, 7.0 (4.4 to 11.1), all p&lt;0.001). The 5-year risks of requiring additional therapy after surgery for a Stage 1A, 2A, and 3A patient is 9.7%, 16.2%, and 38%, respectively. The 5-year risks of requiring additional therapy after radiation with or without ADT for a Stage 1A, 2A, and 3A patient are 7.3%, 10.4% and 27.9%, respectively. Conclusions: The STAR-CAP grouping system can prognosticate risk of requiring additional therapies after primary treatment of localized prostate cancer. The lower risk of subsequent therapy seen in RT patients is likely due to use of ADT with RT. Using STAR-CAP to prognosticate risk of subsequent therapies after primary treatment can help guide treatment intensification decisions upfront.

Dissecting the immune suppressive human prostate tumor microenvironment via integrated single-cell and spatial transcriptomic analyses

The treatment of low-risk primary prostate cancer entails active surveillance only, while high-risk disease requires multimodal treatment including surgery, radiation therapy, and hormonal therapy. Recurrence and development of metastatic disease remains a clinical problem, without a clear understanding of what drives immune escape and tumor progression. Here, we comprehensively describe the tumor microenvironment of localized prostate cancer in comparison with adjacent normal samples and healthy controls. Single-cell RNA sequencing and high-resolution spatial transcriptomic analyses reveal tumor context dependent changes in gene expression. Our data indicate that an immune suppressive tumor microenvironment associates with suppressive myeloid populations and exhausted T-cells, in addition to high stromal angiogenic activity. We infer cell-to-cell relationships from high throughput ligand-receptor interaction measurements within undissociated tissue sections. Our work thus provides a highly detailed and comprehensive resource of the prostate tumor microenvironment as well as tumor-stromal cell interactions.

Narrative review-focal therapy: are we ready to change the prostate cancer treatment paradigm?

Prostate cancer (PCa) has seen improved detection methods with a subsequent rise in disease prevalence, making novel prostate cancer treatment options an exciting yet controversial topic. Current treatment modalities encompass traditional approaches, namely surgery (radical prostatectomy) and radiation therapy. While heralded as a standard of care, these modalities may come with significant risk profiles, primarily sexual (erectile dysfunction) and urinary incontinence. Advances in technology and imaging, specifically multi-parametric MRI, have afforded great leaps in targeted focal therapy as a primary treatment option for localized PCa. This review identifies and highlights published data for novel and emerging PCa focal therapy (FT) modalities. Our study identified and reviewed the current literature for relevant investigations related to primary FT modalities as they apply to the treatment of prostate cancer. After an internal review, relevant studies (published in English, between 2000-April 2022) were included for analysis and summarization. We provide a concise review of several novel focal therapy modalities that offer realistic potential for primary treatment of localized prostate cancer. Our narrative includes studies that primarily include their respective results, specifically focusing on those that reported both oncologic and quality-of-life outcomes after focal therapy. While still in its cumulative infancy, we discuss the current limitations, future directions, and advancements that hopefully push focal therapy into the limelight. While many of the mentioned focal therapies for PCa have shown promising pathologic and quality of life outcomes, further clinical evidence is required to change overall management guidelines and recommendations. The advantages of FT in avoiding sexual and urinary side-effects of radical surgery or radiation are apparent; however, it is necessary to recognize the need for further long-term evidence that is durable over time and comparable to current gold-standard treatment options.