Treatment Of Metastatic Cancer Research Articles

Biomarker-stratified first-line treatment of right-sided metastatic colon cancer with interdisciplinary collaboration in the IVOPAK II trial.

Patients with right-sided metastatic colon carcinoma have a significantly worse prognosis than those with left-sided colorectal cancer (CRC), regardless of treatment. The aim of the prospective IVOPAK II study was to implement an interdisciplinary guideline-conform personalized CRC palliative therapy of metastatic colorectal carcinoma and to improve the overall survival (OS) by multidisciplinary approach via secondary metastatic resection. We present the efficacy data of first-line treatment and the benefit of interdisciplinary collaboration of right-sided metastatic colon carcinoma patients: n = 25. RAS mutation: n = 20 (80%): received systemic first-line treatment: FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab. All-RAS-wildtype: n = 5 (20%): received systemic first-line treatment: FOLFIRI plus cetuximab. Last date evaluation: 31 January 2024. Median age: 59.6 years (range 42-71), men/women: 14/11. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) index: 0/1/2 : 11/10/4. Evaluable for response: n = 25. Complete response: n = 0, partial response: n = 14 (56%), stable disease: n = 8 (32%), progressive disease: n = 3 (12%), early tumor shrinkage: n = 13 (52%), estimates progression-free survival: 13 months (95% CI 8-17 months), estimated OS: 48 months (95% CI 25-71 months), median follow-up: 26 months (1-61 months), no evidence of disease: n = 4 (16%). A chemotherapy doublette regimen with FOLFIRI plus a biological as first-line treatment shows promising efficacy and secondary metastatic resection after interdisciplinary discussion was associated with a survival benefit in right-sided metastatic colon carcinoma.

Hypofractionated radiotherapy plus PD-1 antibody and SOX chemotherapy as second-line therapy in metastatic pancreatic cancer: a single-arm, phase II clinical trial

PurposeTo assess the efficacy and safety of concurrent hypofractionated radiotherapy plus anti-PD-1 antibody and SOX chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC) after failure of first-line chemotherapy.MethodsPatients with pathologically confirmed mPC who failed standard first-line chemotherapy were enrolled. The patients were treated with a regimen of hypofractionated radiotherapy, SOX chemotherapy, and immune checkpoint inhibitors at our institution. We collected the patients’ clinical information and outcome measurements. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) was the primary endpoint of the study, followed by disease control rate (DCR), objective response rate (ORR), median overall survival (mOS) and safety. Exploratory analyses included biomarkers related to the benefits.ResultsBetween February 24, 2021, and August 30, 2023, twenty-five patients were enrolled in the study, and twenty-three patients who received at least one dose of the study agent had objective efficacy evaluation. The mPFS was 5.48 months, the mOS was 6.57 months, and the DCR and ORR were 69.5% and 30.4%, respectively. Among the seven patients who achieved a PR, the median duration of the response was 7.41 months. On-treatment decreased serum CA19-9 levels were associated with better overall survival. Besides, pretreatment inflammatory markers were associated with tumor response and survival.ConclusionsClinically meaningful antitumor activity and favorable safety profiles were demonstrated after treatment with these combination therapies in patients with refractory mPC. On-treatment decreased serum CA19-9 levels and pretreatment inflammatory markers platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) might be biomarkers related to clinical benefits.Clinical trial registration: https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=130211, identifier: ChiCTR2100049799, date of registration: 2021–08-09.

Prediction of PSA Response after Dexamethasone Switch during Abiraterone Acetate + Prednisolone Treatment of Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Patients.

The aim was to elaborate a predictive model to find responders for the corticosteroid switch (from prednisolone to dexamethasone) at the first prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression (≥25% increase) during abiraterone acetate (AA) treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients. If PSA has decreased (≥25%) after switch, patients were considered responders. Logistic regression of 19 dichotomized parameters from routine laboratory and patients' history was used to find the best model in a cohort of 67 patients. The model was validated in another cohort of 42 patients. The model provided 92.5% and 90.5% accuracy in the testing and the validation cohorts, respectively. Overall the accuracy was 91.7%. The AUC of ROC curve was 0.92 (95% CI 0.85-0.96). After a median follow-up of 27.9 (26.3-84) months, the median AA+dexamethasone treatment duration (TD) in non-responders and responders was 4.7 (3.1-6.5) and 11.1 (8.5-12.9) months and the median overall survival (OS) was 23.2 (15.6-25.8) and 33.5 (26.1-38) months, respectively. Multivariate Cox regression revealed that responsiveness was an independent marker of TD and OS. A high accuracy model was developed for mCRPC patients in predicting cases which might benefit from the switch. For non-responders, induction of the next systemic treatment is indicated.

First-Line Treatment With Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab and Chemotherapy for US Patients With Metastatic, Persistent, or Recurrent Cervical Cancer: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

ObjectivesThe BETAcc clinical trial demonstrated that chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab plus atezolizumab (CBA) significantly prolonged progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with metastatic, persistent, or recurrent cervical cancer. However, to the best of our knowledge, the economic value of using this new therapy for this indication is currently unknown. Therefore, our study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of CBA for the first-line treatment of metastatic, persistent, or recurrent cervical cancer from the United States healthcare payers perspective. MethodsA state-transition Markov model over a 10-year lifetime horizon was developed to compare the cost and effectiveness of CBA with that of chemotherapy plus bevacizumab (CB). The primary outcomes of our study included costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. One-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were performed to assess the robustness of the results. ResultsCBA was associated with an additional 0.58 QALY at an extra cost of $172 495.90 compared with CB. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $295 972.43/QALY, significantly higher than the willingness-to-pay threshold value of $150 000/QALY. One-way sensitivity analyses revealed that results were most sensitive to the progression-free disease utility, the unit cost of atezolizumab, and progressed disease utility. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated that CBA achieved a 4.3% probability of cost-effectiveness at a $150 000/QALY threshold. To achieve cost-effectiveness, the unit price of atezolizumab must be reduced by approximately 56.6%. ConclusionsCBA treatment is unlikely to be a cost-effective option compared with CB for patients with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer in the United States.

Activating transcription factor 3 mediates apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in TP53-mutated anaplastic thyroid cancer cells

BackgroundIt is believed that loss of p53 function plays a crucial role in the progression of well to poorly differentiated thyroid cancers including anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC). Given the poor prognosis of ATC due to its strong therapeutic resistance, there is a need to establish new therapeutic targets to extend the survival of ATC patients. Activating transcription factor 3 (ATF3) can inhibit the oncogenic activity of mutant p53 and, as a result, contribute to tumor suppression in several TP53-mutated cancers. Herein, we demonstrate that the ectopic overexpression of ATF3 leads to the suppression of oncogenic mutant p53 activity in chemo-resistant 8305 C thyroid cancer cells harboring R273C p53 gene mutation.MethodsThe biological behavior of 8305 C cells was assessed pre- and post-transfection with pCMV6-ATF3 plasmid using MTT assay, fluorescent microscopy, cell cycle, and annexin V/PI flow cytometric analysis. The effect of ectopic ATF3 overexpression on the cellular level of p53 was examined by western blotting assay. The mRNA expression levels of TP53, TAp63, ΔNp63, and SHARP1 were evaluated in ectopic ATF3-expressing cells compared to controls.ResultsThe overexpression of ATF3 in 8305 C thyroid cancer cells significantly decreased cell viability and induced apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in vitro. The immunoblotting of p53 protein revealed that ATF3 overexpression significantly increased the level of mutant p53 in 8305C cells compared to mock-transfected control cells. Additionally, elevated mRNA levels of TAp63 and SHARP1 and a decreased mRNA level of ΔNp63 were observed in PCMV6-AC-ATF3-transfected 8305 C cells with significant differences compared to the mock and untreated cells.ConclusionIn light of our findings, it is evident that therapeutic strategies aimed at increasing ATF3 expression or enhancing the interaction between ATF3 and mutant p53 can be a promising approach for the treatment of p53-mutated metastatic thyroid cancer.

Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen PET/CT-Guided, Metastasis-Directed Radiotherapy for Oligometastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

Systemic treatments for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) include androgen deprivation therapy, androgen receptor pathway inhibitors, chemotherapy, and radiopharmaceuticals, all of which have associated toxicity. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT allows for higher sensitivity in detecting metastatic disease than is possible with conventional imaging. We hypothesized that PSMA PET/CT-guided, metastasis-directed radiotherapy may offer durable disease control with low toxicity rates in patients with mCRPC who have a limited number of metastases. Methods: We retrospectively screened 5 prospective PSMA PET/CT studies for patients with mCRPC who had up to 5 sites of oligorecurrent or oligoprogressive disease on PSMA PET/CT and subsequently received definitive-intent, metastasis-directed radiotherapy to all new or progressing sites with concurrent androgen deprivation therapy. Progression-free survival, freedom from new lines of systemic therapy, and overall survival (OS) were calculated from the start of metastasis-directed radiotherapy using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Biochemical response was defined as at least a 50% decrease in prostate-specific antigen 6 mo after the start of treatment. Toxicity was graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5. Results: Twenty-four patients met the inclusion criteria with a median follow-up of 33.8 mo (interquartile range, 27.6-45.1 mo). Between October 2017 and April 2023, 11 patients (45.8%) had 1 treated site, 10 patients (41.7%) had 2, and 3 patients (12.5%) had 3. Five sites were prostate or prostate bed, 15 were nodal, 19 were osseous, and 1 was visceral. Seventeen patients (70.8%) continued their preexisting systemic therapy, whereas 7 (29.2%) started a new systemic therapy. Median progression-free survival was 16.4 mo (95% CI, 9.8-23.0 mo). The biochemical response rate was 66.7%. Median freedom from a new line of systemic therapy was 29.0 mo (95% CI, 7.6-50.4 mo). Median OS was not reached. The 2- and 4-y OS rates were 91.1% (95% CI, 79.3%-100%) and 68.8% (95% CI, 45.1%-92.5%), respectively. Grade 2 and grade 3 or higher toxicity rates were 4.2% and 0%, respectively. Conclusion: PSMA PET/CT-guided, metastasis-directed radiotherapy appears to offer durable disease control with low toxicity rates for oligometastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Further prospective studies are needed to compare metastasis-directed radiotherapy with systemic therapy versus systemic therapy alone and PSMA PET/CT-guided versus conventional imaging-guided radiotherapy.

Health and Economic Outcomes of Pembrolizumab in the Treatment of Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (mNSCLC) and Melanoma in Italy.

In Italy, the management of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer and melanoma leads to significant healthcare challenges, necessitating cost-effective treatment strategies and offering valuable insights for healthcare policymakers and stakeholders. This study was designed to assess the costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) associated with the health and economic outcomes of (1) pembrolizumab-combined chemotherapy administered as a first-line treatment for metastatic non-squamous and squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) where the tumour presents with a programmed death-ligand 1 expression level <50% and of (2) adjuvant pembrolizumab treatment for stage III melanoma. Three cost-effectiveness models developed by MSD were investigated for each treatment indication. A unique model was built to assess the overall effect of pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy or watchful waiting in patients with lung cancer or melanoma, respectively. Theoretical cohorts of patients with metastatic squamous and non-squamous NSCLC were followed over time using a partitioned survival model with weekly cycles. A weekly cycle Markov model was employed for melanoma. The analysis was conducted from the Italian National Health Service perspective, considering a time horizon of 40 years (lifetime). A single closed cohort of treatable patients was followed over time for each indication (4000, 7000 and 900 for NSCLC squamous, non-squamous and melanoma, respectively). The costs evaluated included those for adverse drug events, non-drug disease management, subsequent treatment and terminal care. Drug acquisition and administration costs were excluded. For each treatment indication assessed, pembrolizumab produced downstream direct cost offsets (- €122,498,568, -€133,369,076 and -€32,993,242 for NSCLC squamous, non-squamous and melanoma indications, respectively), increased quality of life (+2088, +5317 and +2307 QALYs for NSCLC squamous, non-squamous and melanoma indications, respectively) and reduced disability (-2658, -7202 and -3029 DALYs for NSCLC squamous, non-squamous and melanoma indications, respectively). Across indications, the total cost offsets of pembrolizumab were -€288,860,885, with 9712 QALYs gained and 12,889 DALYs avoided. The analysis demonstrated that, compared with chemotherapy, pembrolizumab is more cost effective in Italy as a first-line treatment in patients with metastatic squamous or non-squamous NSCLC and, if compared with watchful waiting, as adjuvant treatment in patients with stage III melanoma. The present analysis suggested that pembrolizumab use could lead to important health benefits for patients while offsetting a portion of cancer care costs.

What's new in gastric cancer?

In the locally advanced stage, multimodal therapies such as perioperative chemotherapy with FLOT or neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy are recommended. The integration of immunotherapy into these concepts could improve the prognosis. Phase II/III trials such as DANTE, KEYNOTE-585 and MATTERHORN show promising results in terms of pathological remissions but data on survival time extension for unselected patients are so far sobering. Immunotherapies and new targeted therapies offer hope in the palliative treatment of metastatic gastric cancer. Studies such as CheckMate-649 and KEYNOTE-859 show an improvement in survival and response rates. Currently, both pembrolizumab and nivolumab have been approved for the first-line treatment of tumors with positive PD-L1 expression. In HER2-positive tumors, the KEYNOTE-811 study showed that patients benefit from combination therapies with immune checkpoint inhibition and anti-HER2 therapies. The antibody-drug conjugate trastuzumab-deruxtecan is a promising second-line treatment option for HER2-positive tumors after treatment failure with trastuzumab.In addition, the bispecific antibody zanidatamab shows promising results in first-line treatment. New targeted therapies against CLDN18.2 and FGFR2b are showing promising results. The anti-claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2) antibody zolbetuximab leads to improved survival compared to chemotherapy alone in patients with CLDN18.2 positive disease in first-line therapy, with approval expected in 2024.

Abiraterone or Enzalutamide for Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Abiraterone acetate and enzalutamide are recommended as preferred treatments for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), but differences in their relative efficacy are unclear due to a lack of head-to-head clinical trials. Clear guidance is needed for making informed mCRPC therapeutic choices. To compare clinical outcomes in patients with mCRPC treated with abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide. This retrospective, multicenter cohort study included patients with mCRPC in the US Department of Veterans Affairs health care system who initiated treatment with abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide between January 1, 2014, and October 30, 2022. Abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide. The study used inverse probability of treatment weighting to balance baseline characteristics between patients initiating abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide and evaluated restricted mean survival time (RMST) differences in overall survival (OS), prostate cancer-specific survival (PCS), time to next treatment switching or death (TTS), and time to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response (TTR) at different time points after treatment initiation. The study included 5779 patients (median age, 74.42 years [IQR, 68.94-82.14 years]). Median follow-up was between 38 and 60 months. Patients initiating enzalutamide on average had longer OS than those initiating abiraterone acetate, with RMSTs of 24.29 months (95% CI, 23.58-24.99 months) and 23.38 months (95% CI, 22.85-23.92 months), respectively, and a difference in RMST of 0.90 months (95% CI, 0.02-1.79 months) at 4 years. Similarly, TTS and TTR were improved in patients initiating enzalutamide, with an RMST at 4 years of 1.95 months (95% CI, 0.92-2.99 months) longer for TTS and 3.57 months (95% CI, 1.76-5.38 months) shorter for TTR. For PCS, the RMST at 2 years was 0.48 months (95% CI, 0.01-0.95 months) longer. An examination of subgroups identified that enzalutamide initiation was associated with longer RMST in OS among patients without prior docetaxel treatment (1.14 months; 95% CI, 0.19-2.10 months) and in those with PSA doubling time of 3 months or longer (2.23 months; 95% CI, 0.81-3.66 months) but not among patients with prior docetaxel (-0.25 months; 95% CI, -2.59 to 2.09 months) or with PSA doubling time of less than 3 months (0.05 months; 95% CI, -1.05 to 1.15 months). In this cohort study of patients with mCRPC, initiation of enzalutamide was associated with small but statistically significant improvements in OS, PCS, TTS, and TTR compared with initiation of abiraterone acetate. The improvements were more prominent in short-term outcomes, including TTS and TTR, and in patient subgroups without prior docetaxel or with PSA doubling time longer than 3 months.

Interlesional response heterogeneity is associated with the prognosis of abiraterone treatment in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Interlesional response heterogeneity (ILRH) poses challenges to the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Currently, there are no prospective clinical trials exploring the prognostic significance of ILRH on paired positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in the context of abiraterone therapy. In this prospective study, we enrolled patients with mCRPC treated with abiraterone (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05188911; ChiCTR.org.cn: ChiCTR2000034708). 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)+18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) monitoring were performed at baseline and week 13. Patients were grouped by their early ILRH measurement. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the predictive role of ILRH for conventional progression-free survival (PFS) through the concordance index (C-index) assessment. Conventional PFS was defined as the time from medication to conventional radiographic progression, clinical progression, or death. Ultimately, 33 patients were included with a median follow-up of 28.7months. Baseline+week 13 PSMA PET/CT revealed that 33.3% of patients showed ILRH. Those patients with hetero-responding disease had significantly different PFS compared to the responding and non-responding groups (hazard ratio: responding group= reference, hetero-responding group= 4.0, non-responding group= 5.8; p<0.0001). The C-index of ILRH on paired PSMA PET/CT (0.742 vs. 0.660) and FDG PET/CT (0.736 vs. 0.668) for conventional PFS was higher than that of PSA response. In an exploratory analysis, PSMA-/FDG+ lesions at week 13 were identified as a strong surrogate for poor conventional PFS (p= 0.039). ILRH on both baseline+week 13 PSMA and FDG PET/CT strongly associated with conventional PFS. This study was funded by the Ministry of Science and Technology of China and Shanghai.

Combination of PARP Inhibitors and Androgen Receptor Pathway Inhibitors in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

Despite recent advances in the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer, progression to a castration-resistant state remains inevitable for most and prognosis is limited. Genetic testing for homologous recombination repair pathway alterations is recommended for all patients with advanced prostate cancer given that a mutation is present in up to 25% of cases. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARPis) are now approved for use in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who have progressed on an androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) and harbour a germline or somatic homologous recombination repair mutation. Preclinical data support a synergistic effect with an ARPI and PARPi, and various ARPI-PARPi combinations have therefore been explored in phase III clinical trials. Despite heterogeneous findings, a clear hierarchy of benefit is evident, with patients harbouring a BRCA mutation deriving the greatest magnitude of benefit, followed by any homologous recombination repair mutation. The benefit in homologous recombination repair-proficient cohort is less clear, and questions remain about whether ARPI-PARPi combination therapy should be offered to patients without a homologous recombination repair mutation. With ARPIs now considered standard-of-care for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, ARPI-PARPi combination therapy is currently being explored earlier in the treatment paradigm. The purpose of this review is to discuss the rationale behind ARPI-PARPi combination therapy, summarise the results of key clinical trials, and discuss clinical considerations and future perspectives.

Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations of Systemic Treatments for Advanced and Metastatic Gastric Cancer.

Recent advances in the development of biomarker-directed therapy and immunotherapy, for advanced and metastatic gastric cancers, have the potential to improve survival and quality of life.Much attention has been directed towards second- and later-line treatments, and the landscape here is evolving rapidly. However, uncertainty in relative effectiveness, high costs and uncertainty in cost effectiveness represent challenges for decision makers. To identify economic evaluations for the second-line or later-line treatment of advanced and metastatic gastric cancer. Also, to assess key criteria (including model assumptions, inputs and outcomes), reporting completeness andmethodological quality to inform future cost-effectiveness evaluations. A systematic literature search (from database inception to 5 March 2023) of EconLit via EBSCOhost, Cochrane Library (restricted to National Health Service [NHS] Economic Evaluation Database and Health Technology Assessment [HTA] Database), Embase, MEDLINE and of grey literature was conducted. This aimed to identify systemic treatments that align with National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Clinical Practice Guidelines. Data were collected on key criteria and on reporting completeness and methodological quality. A narrative synthesis focussed on cost-effectiveness and cost-of-illness studies. Outcomes of interest included total and incremental costs and outcomes (life-years and quality-adjusted life-years), ratios of incremental costs per unit outcome and other summary cost and outcome measures. Also, for cost-effectiveness studies, reporting completeness and the methodological quality were assessed using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) and the Philips Checklist, respectively. A total of 19 eligible economic evaluations were identified (cost-effectiveness studies [n = 15] and cost-of-illness studies [n = 4]). There was a general lack of consistency in the methodological approaches taken across studies. In the main, the cost-effectiveness studies indicated that the intervention under consideration was more effective and more costly than the comparator(s). However, most interventions were not cost effective. No studies were fully compliant with reporting-completeness and methodological-quality requirements. Given the lack of consistency in the approaches taken across cost-of-illness studies, outcomes could not be directly compared. To our knowledge, this is the first published systematic literature review that has qualitatively synthesised economic evaluations for advanced and metastatic gastric cancer. There were differences in the approaches taken across the cost-effectiveness studies and the cost-of-illness studies. The conclusions of most of the cost-effectiveness studies were consistent despite identified differences in approaches. In the main, the interventions under consideration were not cost effective, presenting challenges to sustainability and affordability. We highlight a requirement for cost-effectiveness evaluations and for second-line or later-line treatments of advanced and metastatic gastric cancer that consider all relevant comparators and that are compliant with reporting-completeness and methodological-quality requirements. By addressing the methodological gaps identified here, future healthcare decision-making, within the context of this rapidly changing treatment landscape, would be better informed. CRD42023405951.

Pembrolizumab with platinum-based chemotherapy with or without epacadostat as first-line treatment for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: a randomized, partially double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II study

BackgroundThe combination of the checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) pembrolizumab and platinum-based chemotherapy is effective frontline therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) lacking targetable mutations. Indoleamine 2,3- dioxygenase 1 (IDO1), an enzyme involved in kynurenine production, inhibits immune responses. Inhibition of IDO1 may restore antitumor immunity and augment CPI activity. This trial evaluated addition of epacadostat, a potent and highly selective IDO1 inhibitor, to pembrolizumab and chemotherapy for metastatic NSCLC.MethodsECHO-306/KEYNOTE-715 was a partial double-blind, randomized phase II study of adults with treatment-naïve stage IV NSCLC not indicated for EGFR-, ALK-, or ROS1-directed therapy. Patients were randomized to one of three treatment arms: epacadostat-pembrolizumab-chemotherapy (E + P + C; blinded), epacadostat-pembrolizumab (E + P; open-label) or placebo-pembrolizumab-chemotherapy (PBO + P + C; blinded). Stratification was by PD-L1 tumor proportion score (< 50% vs. ≥ 50%) and tumor histology (non-squamous vs. squamous). A protocol amendment closed enrollment in the open-label E + P group, excluding it from efficacy analyses. Intravenous pembrolizumab (200 mg) was administered every 21 days and epacadostat 100 mg or matching placebo (oral) twice daily (BID) for ≤ 35 3-week cycles. The primary objective was objective response rate (ORR) for E + P + C vs. PBO + P + C.Results178 patients were randomized to E + P + C (n = 91) or PBO + P + C (n = 87); 55 were enrolled in the E + P group. The E + P + C group had a lower confirmed ORR (26.4%; 95% CI 17.7–36.7) than the PBO + P + C group (44.8%; 95% CI 34.1–55.9), with a difference of − 18.5% (95% CI − 32.0 – (− 4.3); one-sided P = 0.9948). The E + P + C group had a numerically higher percentage of confirmed responders with extended response ≥ 6 months (29.2% vs. 15.4%). Circulating kynurenine levels at C1D1 were similar to those at C2D1 in all treatment groups and were not reduced to normal levels with epacadostat 100 mg BID plus P + C. The safety profile of E + P + C was consistent with that for PBO + P + C.ConclusionsAddition of epacadostat 100 mg BID to pembrolizumab and platinum-based chemotherapy was generally well tolerated but did not improve ORR in patients with treatment-naïve metastatic NSCLC. Evaluating epacadostat doses that normalize circulating kynurenine in combination with CPIs may help determine the clinical potential of this combination.Trial registrationNCT03322566. Registered October 26, 2017.

Epacadostat plus pembrolizumab versus placebo plus pembrolizumab as first-line treatment for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer with high levels of programmed death-ligand 1: a randomized, double-blind phase 2 study

BackgroundPembrolizumab is a first-line therapy for certain patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Combining pembrolizumab with other immunotherapies may enhance tumor cell killing and clinical outcomes. Epacadostat is a selective inhibitor of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1, an immuno-regulatory enzyme involved in tryptophan to kynurenine metabolism that inhibits T cell-mediated immune responses.MethodsIn this randomized phase II study, patients with metastatic NSCLC expressing high (≥ 50%) programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) levels received pembrolizumab 200 mg every 21 days plus oral epacadostat 100 mg twice daily (combination) or matching placebo (control). The primary objective was objective response rate (ORR); secondary objectives were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), duration of response (DOR) and safety/tolerability.Results154 patients were randomized (77 per group). Median (range) follow-up was 6.8 months (0.1–11.4) and 7.0 months (0.2–11.9) in the combination and control groups, respectively Confirmed ORR was similar between groups (combination: 32.5%, 95% CI 22.2–44.1; control: 39.0%, 95% CI 28.0–50.8; difference: − 6.5, 95% CI − 21.5 to 8.7; 1-sided P = 0.8000). Median (range) DOR was 6.2 months (1.9 + to 6.5 +) and not reached (1.9 + to 8.6 +) in the combination and control groups, respectively. Although not formally tested, median PFS was 6.7 and 6.2 months for the combination and control groups, respectively, and median OS was not reached in either group. Circulating kynurenine levels increased from C1D1 to C2D1 (P < 0.01) in the control group and decreased from C1D1 to C2D1 (P < 0.01) in the combination group but were not normalized in most patients. The most frequent serious adverse events (AEs) (≥ 2%) were pneumonia (4.0%), anemia (2.7%), atelectasis (2.7%) and pneumonitis (2.7%) in the combination group and pneumonia (3.9%), pneumonitis (2.6%) and hypotension (2.6%) in the control group. Two deaths due to drug-related AEs were reported, both in the control group.ConclusionsAddition of epacadostat to pembrolizumab therapy for PD-L1–high metastatic NSCLC was generally well tolerated but did not demonstrate an improved therapeutic effect. Evaluating higher doses of epacadostat that normalize kynurenine levels when given in combination with checkpoint inhibitors may be warranted.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03322540. Registered 10/26/2017.

Severe neutropenia probably caused by enzalutamide and abiraterone in a prostate cancer patient.

Abiraterone and enzalutamide are two androgen receptor pathway inhibitors approved, among others, for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in adult men whose disease has progressed on or after a docetaxel-based regimen. Although hematological effects, especially neutropenia, are one of the main complications of other oral antineoplastic drugs, these adverse effects are infrequent in the case of androgen receptor pathway inhibitors. We report the case of a patient diagnosed with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who discontinued an androgen receptor pathway inhibitor due to drug-related grade 4 neutropenia. His control blood counts before enzalutamide starting were normal. After one month of treatment, he developed a grade 4 neutropenia, with complete neutrophil count recovery four weeks later. He underwent a bone marrow aspiration, which revealed normocelullar results, and enzalutamide was restarted. Three weeks later, the treatment was eventually discontinued due to neutropenia reappearance. Neutrophil count recovery was achieved one month later. Then, he started treatment with abiraterone, but two weeks later neutropenia reappeared. Abiraterone was withdrawn, and the patient recovered from neutropenia 2 weeks later. This case exposes not only the occurrence of rare toxicity of two individual drugs but also the description of a probable drug-class adverse event not reported before. The patient recovered from neutropenia after the androgen receptor pathway inhibitor was withdrawn, thereby supporting the diagnosis of probable drug-induced neutropenia. There is scarce evidence in the literature concerning androgen receptor pathway inhibitor-related neutropenia. However, its life-threatening potential cannot be ignored, so healthcare professionals should be warned of the possibility of the occurrence of such adverse reactions.

A Review of Abiraterone Acetate for the Treatment of Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

A Review of Abiraterone Acetate for the Treatment of Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Real-life Data on First- and Second-Line Treatment of Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer With Abiraterone, Enzalutamide and Cabazitaxel – A multicentric Study From Portugal

Introduction and objectivesNew drugs for metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) were approved, first in the pos-docetaxel and then in the pre-docetaxel setting. We aim to assess the real daily practice benefit of abiraterone (Abi), enzalutamide (Enz) and cabazitaxel (Cab) in patients with mCRPC, compare it with RCT results and compare Abi vs Enz. Materials and methodsWe retrospectively collected the data of all consecutive mCRPC patients treated with Abi, Enz or Cab in the six major oncological hospitals in the north of Portugal until December 2020. ResultsA total of 470 treatments pre-docetaxel (163 Abi and 307 Enz) and 373 pos-docetaxel (160 Abi, 148 Enz and 59 Cab) were included, with median follow-up time of 35 months. Mean age was 73.1, 84.4% had ECOG status < 2, ISUP grade was ≥ 4 in 59% and 28.0% had oligometastatic disease. In first line, for Abi and for Enz respectively, the proportion of patients with PSA reduction > 50% was 64.4% and 80.4% (P < .001), the mean duration of treatment (DT) was 10 and 14 months (P = .037) and the median overall survival (OS) was 25 months and 30 months (P = .17). In second line the results for Abi, Enz and Cab were respectively: proportion of patients with PSA reduction > 50% was 40.4%, 57.4% and 24.6% (p for Abi vs Enz=0.004); DT was 7, 8, and 3 months (p for Abi vs Enz = 0.27); OS was 17, 22 and 10 months (p for Abi vs. Enz = 0,07). ConclusionThese drugs have good efficacy in real-world evidence, similar to those reported in randomized clinical trials, with the expected exception of lower OS due to the inclusion of a broader sample of patients. Our results add to the evidence that Enz might have better efficacy in this setting compared with Abi.

A cell targeting and sorting approach based on the magnetophoretic capturing for early prognostics of metastatic cervical cancer cells

HeLa cervical cancer cells are immortal with telomerase activity and metastatic characteristics similar to circulating tumor cells (CTCs). Here, we report aptamer-modified multilayered magnetic beads (Apt@MBs) that efficiently targeted and captured HeLa cells up to a low concentration of freshly prepared cell suspension (500 cells/mL). Apt@MBs were functionalized with fluorophore-conjugated AS1411-aptamer on an outer layer made up of molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) to target nucleolin on the cell surface of captured HeLa cells. Moreover, this outer MoS2 layer of MBs was nanoporous and could load anticancer drugs inside its porous cavities with the possibility of killing the captured and metastatic CTCs in vivo. An internal core layer of Apt@MBs consisting of Ag–Fe3O4 magnetic particles (MPs) was designed for magnetic manifestations and cell sorting with the possibility of screening CTCs (in the patient's blood samples) for early diagnosis of metastatic cancers. The Apt@MBs after cell capture gave rise to the heavier HeLa-MBs composites to get settled down under gravitational/inertial forces to the bottom of the tube quicker than the free cells (within 10 min). The gravitational settling of HeLa-MBs was further coupled with exposing a magnetic field to effectively capture and enrich the cells at the bottom of the tube (from 91 to 98 % cells). While the fluid containing dead, non-cancerous, or uncaptured cells in the supernatant layers were easily removed by pipetting. The HeLa-MBs after sorting out were resuspended into a fresh culture medium for further incubation or cellular analysis. Moreover, both cisplatin (CP) and epirubicin (EP) loaded Apt@MBs showed the killing of about 50 % of the captured cells. Therefore, we are confident that Apt@MBs can contribute to enumerating patients' blood samples for screening CTCs to timely and efficiently detect metastatic cancers along with the ability to effectively perform prognosis, and treatment of metastatic cancers.

Organ and tumor dosimetry including method simplification for [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T for treatment of metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer

BackgroundInternal dosimetry in individual patients is essential for safe and effective radioligand therapy. Multiple time point imaging for accurate dosimetry is time consuming and hence can be demanding for nuclear medicine departments as well as patients. The objectives of this study were (1) to assess absorbed doses to organs at risk and tumor lesions for [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T using whole body SPECT imaging and (2) to investigate possible simplified dosimetry protocols.MethodsThis study included 16 patients each treated with 4 cycles of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T. They underwent quantitative whole body SPECT/CT imaging (3 bed positions) at four time points (TP) comprising 2 h, 24 h, 48 h and 72–168 h post-injection (p.i.). Full 3D dosimetry (reference method) was performed for all patients and dose cycles for organs at risk (kidneys, parotid glands and submandibular glands) and up to ten tumor lesions per patient (resulting in 90 lesions overall). The simplified dosimetry methods (SM) included (1) generating time activity curves for subsequent cycles using a single TP of imaging applying the kinetics of dose cycle 1, and for organs at risk also (2) simple extrapolation from dose cycle 1 and (3) from both, dose cycle 1 and 2.ResultsNormalized absorbed doses were 0.71 ± 0.32 mGy/MBq, 0.28 ± 0.12 mGy/MBq and 0.22 ± 0.08 mGy/MBq for kidneys, parotid glands and submandibular glands, respectively. Tumor doses decreased from 3.86 ± 3.38 mGy/MBq in dose cycle 1 to 2.01 ± 2.65 mGy/MBq in dose cycle 4. Compared to the full dosimetry approach the SM 1 using single TP imaging at 48 h p.i. resulted in the most accurate and precise results for the organs at risk in terms of absorbed doses per cycle and total cumulated dose. For tumor lesions better results were achieved using the fourth TP (≥ 72 h p.i.).ConclusionSimplification of safety dosimetry protocols is possible for [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T therapy. If tumor dosimetry is of interest a later imaging TP (≥ 72 h p.i.) should be used/added to account for the slower kinetics of tumors compared to organs at risk.

Pembrolizumab (Keytruda)

CADTH recommends that Keytruda should be reimbursed by public drug plans for the treatment of locally advanced unresectable or metastatic human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma whose tumours express programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) if certain conditions are met. Keytruda should only be covered to treat adult patients who have not received previous treatment for advanced or metastatic esophageal or GEJ cancer and have good performance status. Keytruda should only be reimbursed if prescribed in combination with trastuzumab, fluoropyrimidine, and platinum-containing chemotherapy by a clinician with expertise and experience in treating gastric and GEJ cancer.