Treatment Of Mesothelioma Research Articles

Renal function-based versus standard dosing of pemetrexed: a randomized controlled trial.

Pemetrexed is a chemotherapeutic drug in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer and mesothelioma. Optimized dosing of pemetrexed based on renal function instead of body surface area (BSA) is hypothesized to reduce pharmacokinetic variability in systemic exposure and could therefore improve treatment outcomes. The aim of this study is to compare optimized dosing to standard BSA-based dosing. A multicenter randomized (1:1) controlled trial was performed to assess superiority of optimized dosing versus BSA-based dosing in patients who were eligible for pemetrexed-based chemotherapy. The individual exposure to pemetrexed in terms of area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) was determined. The fraction of patients attaining to a predefined typical target AUC (164mg×h/L ± 25%) was calculated. A total of 81 patients were included. Target attainment was not statistically significant different between both arms (89% vs. 84% (p = 0.505)). The AUC of pemetrexed was similar between the optimized dosing arm (n = 37) and the standard of care arm (n = 44) (155mg × h/L vs 160mg × h/L (p = 0.436). We could not show superiority of optimized dosing of pemetrexed in patients with an adequate renal function does not show added value on the attainment of a pharmacokinetic endpoint, safety, nor QoL compared to standard of care dosing. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03655821.

CSIG-41. SENSITIZING CANCER CELLS TO TUMOR TREATING FIELDS (TTFIELDS) BY INHIBITION OF PI3K

Abstract Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) are alternating electric fields, which disrupt cellular process critical for cancer cell survival and tumor progression. TTFields therapy is approved for the treatment of glioblastoma (GBM) and unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma, and is being tested in clinical studies for the treatment of other solid tumors, including ovarian cancer, non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The current study aimed to detect potential mechanisms that may reduce cellular sensitivity to TTFields, and target these pathways in order to re-sensitize the cells to TTFields. Cancer cells (Ovarian A2780, GBM U-87 MG, and NSCLC H1299) that display reduced sensitivity to TTFields were generated by continuous long-term TTFields application (7 or 13 days, depending on the cell line). A Luminex multiplex assay revealed activation of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway in these cells, with significant increases in phosphorylation levels of AKT and RPS6. This elevation was also observed by immunohistochemistry in tumor sections from N1S1 HCC tumor-bearing rats treated with TTFields relative to sham. Treatment of cells with PI3K inhibitors re-sensitized them to TTFields and downregulated the phosphorylation of AKT. Concomitant application of TTFields with the PI3K inhibitor alpelisib in mice orthotopically implanted with MOSE-L firefly luciferase (FFL) ovarian cancer cells resulted in enhanced efficacy, as determined by In Vivo Imaging System (IVIS) measurements of tumor volume. Overall, this study demonstrated that the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway is involved in reduced cancer cell sensitivity to long-term application of TTFields, and that re-sensitization may be achieved with relevant inhibitors. The results provide a rationale for further examining the potential benefit of TTFields concomitant with PI3K inhibitors.

Novel issues in the epidemiology of asbestos-related diseases

Purpose of review Exposure to asbestos continues to persist because of the use of this mineral in developing countries and because of the naturally occurring asbestos and of the presence of asbestos in the asbestos-containing materials. After more than 30 years since the ban in some countries, asbestos-related malignancies are still diagnosed yearly. Thus, we conducted a systematic search for articles regarding epidemiologic advances in asbestos-related diseases in the last 18 months in order to summarize the newest findings that could, eventually, improve the prevention strategies for asbestos-related cancers. Recent findings There are advances regarding the diagnosis and treatment of mesothelioma. Recent publications confirm a trend for mesothelioma for time since last exposure, while for asbestos-related lung cancer, findings show a linear association between asbestos exposure level and lung cancer risk. Other asbestos-related malignancies have been hypothesized. The importance of an accurate diagnosis of mesothelioma has been further emphasized for the prognosis and therapeutic success of this cancer. Summary Latest findings allow public health to project prevention, and clinicians to project better treatment strategies for asbestos-related diseases. More studies on the treatment options are needed and ‘Tailored’ therapy should be among the focal points.

Enhancing Cancer Cell Membrane Permeability by Application of Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields)

<h3>Purpose/Objective(s)</h3> Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) are alternating electric fields that display anti-mitotic effects on cancer cells. TTFields therapy is approved for treatment of glioblastoma (GBM) and unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma. It has recently been shown that treatment of GBM cells with TTFields increases cell membrane permeability. The current study aimed to further explore this effect, testing the potential of TTFields to facilitate cellular accumulation of the anticancer agent doxorubicin (DOX) <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i>. <h3>Materials/Methods</h3> Breast mammary carcinoma (4T1), breast adenocarcinoma (MCF-7), uterine sarcoma (MES-SA), and lung fibroblast (MRC-5) cell lines were treated with TTFields for 72 h at an intensity of 1.7 V/cm RMS across a range of frequencies (100-400 kHz). Membrane permeability was determined by 7-aminoactinomycin D (7-AAD) intracellular accumulation, and cytotoxicity was examined by cell counts, both measured by flow cytometry. TTFields at the frequency inducing highest permeability were applied together with DOX to DOX-sensitive and matched DOX-resistant 4T1 cells, followed by flow cytometry measurements of intracellular DOX accumulation and cytotoxicity. Mice orthotopically inoculated with 4T1 cells were treated with TTFields for 72 h, with DOX injected 24 h before end of treatment. DOX florescence was measured using flow cytometry for detection at the single-cell level and <i>in vivo</i> imaging system (IVIS) for whole tumor assessment. <h3>Results</h3> While TTFields increased 7-AAD intracellular accumulation in 4T1, MCF-7, and MES-SA cancer cells, there was no such effect when TTFields were applied to the non-cancer MRC-5 cells. Maximal permeability was induced in 4T1 cells with 300 kHz TTFields, whereas highest TTFields-induced cytotoxicity was observed at 150 kHz. TTFields application allowed for DOX accumulation in DOX-resistant cells to the same extent as in DOX-sensitive cells. TTFields delivery also sensitized both cell types to DOX, with cytotoxicity observed at low drug concentrations. <i>In vivo</i>, DOX accumulation was elevated by 2- to 3-fold in tumors isolated from mice treated with TTFields relative to control mice. <h3>Conclusion</h3> TTFields elevated the permeability of 4T1 breast cancer cells, allowing for enhanced intracellular accumulation of DOX and improved drug efficacy, even in cells resistant to DOX. TTFields-induced accumulation of DOX was also demonstrated <i>in vivo</i>.

Malignant pleural mesothelioma in situ.

Although the diagnosis of malignant pleural mesothelioma at an in situ stage was traditionally challenging, it is now possible owing to advances in molecular biological methods such as P16 fluorescence in situ hybridization or BRCA1-associated protein 1 immunohistochemistry. Here, we report the first case, to our knowledge, of total parietal pleurectomy for mesothelioma in situ. Future follow-up and accumulation of cases are necessary to determine whether total parietal pleurectomy could be applied as a treatment for mesothelioma in situ or not.

HEMOPTYSIS: A RARE PRESENTATION OF MALIGNANT PLEURAL MESOTHELIOMA

HEMOPTYSIS: A RARE PRESENTATION OF MALIGNANT PLEURAL MESOTHELIOMA

179 (PB059) - The combination of the metabolism-based targeted therapies ADI-PEG20 and GC7 are a promising strategy for the treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma

Background: Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a highly aggressive cancer with less than a 10% 5-year survival rate. Arginine deprivation using pegylated arginine deiminase (ADI-PEG20) is a promising anti-metabolite strategy for MPM cells deficient in the arginine biosynthetic enzyme ASS1. However, resistance to ADI-PEG20 in MPM is a significant problem and is characterized in part by reprogramming of the urea and polyamine metabolism pathway. We sought to identify a targeted metabolism-based therapy to overcome the emerging resistance and increase the efficiency of ADI-PEG20 treatment for MPM patients.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Pleurectomy/Decortication versus Extrapleural Pneumonectomy in the Treatment of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma.

Objective: Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare and aggressive malignant cancer for which there are poor treatment options. Extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) and pleurectomy decortication (P/D) are the two most used surgical procedures in patients with resectable disease. We reviewed the available literature in order to compare the overall survival and postoperative complications of EPP and P/D and to provide evidence for the best procedure in the treatment of MPM. Methods: We performed a systematic review of the literature, including studies from August 2018 to May 2022. The primary outcome was 5-year overall survival (OS) and the secondary outcomes were 30-day mortality, 90-day mortality and peri-operative complications. Results: Thirteen studies were considered, including a total of 1624 patients treated with EPP and 2147 treated with P/D. The estimated pooled HR showed a significant lower hazard for P/D compared to EPP in terms of OS (HR = 0.76; 95% CI from 0.62 to 0.94; p < 0.001). In 12 studies, the risk for 30-day mortality was lower for patients treated with P/D (RR = 0.49; 95% CI from 0.31 to 0.76; p = <0.01), whereas only five studies reported 90-day mortality, and no statistically significant difference between EPP and P/D was found (RR = 0.71; 95% CI from 0.47 to 1.07; p = 0.10). The OS restricted mean survival time difference meta-analysis (RMSDT) confirms the superior survival of P/D on the EPP, a superiority that increases from 0.54 months at one year to 4.23 at five years. The incidence of postoperative empyema, atrial fibrillation, bleeding and bronchopleural fistula was significantly increased in the EPP group except for prolonged air leakage, which is only characteristic of P/D. Conclusions: Using two different statistical methods, this meta-analysis suggests that long-term survival after surgical treatment for resectable MPM is greater for patients undergoing P/D. Long-term survival had never been previously analyzed with appropriate tests; on the contrary, our result is consistent with the previous meta-analyses and reinforces the evidence of lower 30-day mortality and the prevalence of postoperative complications in P/D versus EPP patients. The recent introduction of innovative therapeutic schemes, both adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy, keeps the discussion on surgical strategy open and will require new studies.

Prediction of the pharmacokinetics of pemetrexed with a low test dose: A proof-of-concept study.

Pemetrexed is a cytotoxic drug used for the treatment of lung cancer and mesothelioma. The use of a low test dosing of cytotoxic drugs may aid in dose individualization without causing harm. The aim of this proof-of-concept study was to assess if the pharmacokinetics (PKs) of a test dose could predict the PKs of a therapeutic pemetrexed dose. Ten patients received both a low test dose (100 μg) and a therapeutic dose of pemetrexed after which plasma concentrations pemetrexed were measured. PK analysis was performed by means of nonlinear mixed-effects modelling. The predictive performances of test dose clearance and renal function towards a therapeutic dose were assessed. The PKs of a pemetrexed test dose were best described by a one-compartment model with linear elimination. A high variability in the administered dose was observed for the test dose, but not for the therapeutic dose. A statistically significant correlation between test dose clearance and therapeutic dose clearance was observed (Spearman's rho: 0.758, P= 0.02). The predictive performance of test dose clearance was worse than renal function: mean predictive error (+95% confidence interval [CI]) 53.9% (50.1-57.6%) vs 19.4% (12.4-26.4%) and normalized root-mean square error (+95% CI) 57.8% (30.5-85.1%) vs 25.7% (20.3-31.0%). We show that test dosing of pemetrexed is feasible, but there seems no added value for a low test dosing in the dose individualization of pemetrexed.

Cytoreductive Surgical Treatment of Pleural Mesothelioma in a Porcine Model Using Magnetic-Resonance-Guided Focused Ultrasound Surgery (MRgFUS) and Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA)

A combination of surgery and chemotherapy is the most effective treatment available for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (MPM). However, both cause significant collateral damage and cannot eliminate residual microscopic disease. This investigation aimed to compare and determine the feasibility of utilizing Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) and Magnetic-Resonance-guided Focused Ultrasound Surgery (MRgFUS) as alternative treatments for MPM. A large animal tumor model was developed in 13 Yorkshire female pigs using the MSTO211H cell line. Two pigs were initially used to determine the cyclosporine dose required for immunosuppression and tumor development. Subsequently, 11 other pigs underwent tumor development. Of these 11, 2 died during cell inoculation. Small tumor masses and adhesions were present in the other 9, indicating mesothelioma development. Five pigs then received RFA treatment, and 4 pigs received MRgFUS treatment. Tumor model development and effect of the two treatments were examined using MRI and by necropsy. RFA and MRgFUS both successfully ablated approximately the same sized area in the same treatment time. This study demonstrates that RFA and MRgFUS are feasible for tumor debulking, and while MRgFUS requires more pretreatment planning compared to RFA, MRgFUS is a completely noninvasive procedure.

Single-Center 20-Year Experience in Surgical Treatment of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma.

Objectives: We examined a series of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) patients who consecutively underwent surgery in our institution during the last 20 years. Across this period, we changed our surgical approach to MPM, adopting extended pleurectomy and decortication (eP/D) instead of extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP). In this study, we compare the perioperative outcomes and long-term survival of patients who underwent EPP vs. eP/D. Methods: A retrospective analysis was carried out of all the MPM patients identified from our departmental database who underwent EPP or P/D from 2000 to 2021. Clavien–Dindo criteria was adopted to score postoperative complications, while Kaplan–Meier methods and a Cox multivariable analysis were used to perform the survival analysis. Results: Of 163 patients, 78 (48%) underwent EPP and 85 (52%) eP/D. Induction chemotherapy was significantly administrated more often in the eP/D group (88% vs. 51%). Complete trimodality treatment including induction chemotherapy, radical surgery, and adjuvant radiotherapy was administered in 74% of the eP/D group versus 32% of the EPP group (p < 0.001). The postoperative morbidity rate was higher in the eP/D group (54%) compared to the EPP group (36%) (p = 0.02); no statistically significant differences were identified concerning major complications (EPP 43% vs. eP/D 24%, p = 0.08). No statistical differences were identified in 30-day mortality, 90-day mortality, median disease-free, and overall survival statistics between the two groups. The Cox multivariable analysis confirmed no induction chemotherapy (HR, 0.5; p = 0.002), RDW (HR, 1.08; p = 0.02), and the presence of pathological nodal disease (HR, 1.99; p = 0.001) as factors associated with worse survival in the entire series. Conclusions: Our data support that eP/D is a well-tolerated procedure allowing the implementation of a trimodality strategy (induction chemotherapy, surgery, and radiotherapy) in most MPM patients. When eP/D is offered in this setting, the oncological results are comparable to EPP. To obtain the best oncological results, the goal of surgical resection should be macroscopic complete resection (R0) in carefully selected patients (clinical N0).

Repurposing clofazimine for malignant pleural mesothelioma treatment — In-vitro assessment of efficacy and mechanism of action

AimsMalignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare cancer of lungs' pleural cavity, with minimally effective therapies available. Thus, there exists a necessity for drug repurposing which is an attractive strategy for drug development in MPM. Repurposing of an old FDA-approved anti-leprotic drug, Clofazimine (CFZ), presents an outstanding opportunity to explore its efficacy in treating MPM. Main methodsCytotoxicity, scratch assay, and clonogenic assays were employed to determine CFZ's ability to inhibit cell viability, cell migration, and colony growth. 3D Spheroid cell culture studies were performed to identify tumor growth inhibition potential of CFZ in MSTO-211H cell line. Gene expression analysis was performed using RT-qPCR assays to determine the CFZ's effect of key genes. Western blot studies were performed to determine CFZ's ability to induce apoptosis its effect to induce autophagy marker. Key findingsCFZ showed significant cytotoxicity against both immortalized and primary patient-derived cell lines with IC50 values ranging from 3.4 μM (MSTO-211H) to 7.1 μM (HAY). CFZ significantly impaired MPM cell cloning efficiency, migration, and tumor spheroid formation. 3D Spheroid model showed that CFZ resulted in reduction in spheroid volume. RT-qPCR data showed downregulation of genes β-catenin, BCL-9, and PRDX1; and upregulation of apoptosis markers such as PARP, Cleaved caspase 3, and AXIN2. Additionally, immunoblot analysis showed that CFZ down-regulates the expression of β-catenin (apoptosis induction) and up-regulates p62, LC3B protein II (autophagy inhibition). SignificanceIt can be concluded that CFZ could be a promising molecule to repurpose for MPM treatment which needs numerous efforts from further studies.

The Mechanisms of Action of Tumor Treating Fields.

Tumor treating fields (TTFields), a new modality of cancer treatment, are electric fields transmitted transdermally to tumors. The FDA has approved TTFields for the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme and mesothelioma, and they are currently under study in many other cancer types. While antimitotic effects were the first recognized biological anticancer activity of TTFields, data have shown that tumor treating fields achieve their anticancer effects through multiple mechanisms of action. TTFields therefore have the ability to be useful for many cancer types in combination with many different treatment modalities. Here, we review the current understanding of TTFields and their mechanisms of action.

Efficacy and Adverse Events of Apatinib Salvage Treatment for Refractory Diffuse Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma: A Pilot Study

ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical efficacy and adverse events (AEs) of apatinib salvage treatment for diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM) that has failed to respond to the recommended treatments.Methods27 patients with refractory DMPM were treated with apatinib at our center from April 2014 to October 2020, at the initial dose of 250 mg/d. The dose was reduced to 125 mg/d when serious adverse events (SAEs) occurred. 28-day was set as a treatment cycle. The frequency of follow up was once every 28 days. The efficacy evaluation was conducted according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 criteria and the serum tumor markers before and after apatinib treatment. The safety assessment was performed with the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0. The primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR), and the secondary endpoints were AEs.ResultsThe 27 patients completed a median treatment-cycle of 15.0, ranging from 5.1 to 39.4 cycles. At the median follow-up of 14.3 (4.8-51.8) months, median overall survival (OS) was 59.4 months, median apatinib-treatment-related survival (ATRS) was 14.0 (4.8-36.8) months. Complete response (CR) was observed in 0 case (0.0%), partial response (PR) in 4 cases (14.8%), stable disease (SD) in 12 cases (44.4%), and progression disease (PD) in 11 cases (40.7%). The ORR was 14.8%, and DCR was 59.3%. The median serum CA125 values before and after apatinib treatment were 32.9 (7.0-4592.4) U/mL and 29.7 (6.1-4327.4) U/mL, respectively (P=0.009). The common AEs were hypertension (6/27; 22.2%), hand-foot syndrome (5/27; 18.5%), albuminuria (4/27; 14.8%), anemia (4/27; 14.8%), leukopenia (4/27; 14.8%), rash (2/27; 7.4%), fatigue (2/27; 7.4%), oral ulcers (2/27; 7.4%), hoarseness (2/27; 7.4%), nausea/vomiting (2/27; 7.4%), diarrhea (2/27; 7.4%), headache (1/27; 3.7%), and fever (1/27; 3.7%). The incidence rate of grade III/IV AEs was 16.2%.ConclusionsApatinib is effective in treating refractory DMPM, with promising efficacy and acceptable safety.

Understanding clinical decision-making in mesothelioma care: a mixed methods study

IntroductionMalignant pleural mesothelioma is a rare, incurable cancer arising from previous asbestos exposure; patients have a poor prognosis, with a median survival rate of 8–14 months. Variation in mesothelioma clinical...

Ten-year single-center experience with treatment of primary diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM) by cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC).

This single-center study evaluated cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM). Prospectively collected data from a single institution data registry was retrospectively investigated. Eighty-four patients with primary malignant peritoneal mesothelioma underwent CRS and HIPEC with cisplatin and doxorubicin either for 60min or 90min of duration from 2011 to 2021. The primary endpoint was overall survival. The secondary endpoint was the evaluation of prognostic factors for overall survival. The tertiary endpoint was to assess the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on survival. The median follow-up was 5.0years (95%-CI 4.6-5.5). The median age was 59.2years (IQR: 47-66). Eighty-two patients (97.6%) had epithelioid tumors. The median peritoneal cancer index was 18.0 (IQR: 13-27). Sixty-six patients (78.6%) had complete or near-complete cytoreduction (CCR 0 or CCR 1). Seventy patients (83.3%) received HIPEC for 60min and 14 patients (16.7%) received it for 90min. Twenty-two patients (26.2%) had grade 3 to 4 complications. Acute kidney injury (AKI) stage I-III occurred in 30 (35.7%) patients. Three patients (3.6%) died perioperatively. The overall median survival was 38.4months (95%-CI 23.6-54.3), and the 5-year survival rate was 42%. Survival was independently associated with age, female gender, and thrombocytosis. Preoperative chemotherapy did not emerge as an adverse prognostic factor. In well-selected patients with DMPM, prolonged survival is achievable with CRS and HIPEC in specialized centers.

Abstract 3156: Tumor Treating Fields reduce cellular survival of human mesenchymal stromal cells via apoptosis and senescence induction

Abstract Background Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields), alternating electric fields with intermediate field intensity, have shown clinical efficacy in several tumor entities, leading to clinical approval for glioblastoma and mesothelioma treatment. As mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) belong to the tumor microenvironment and exhibit - depending on the tumor type and microenvironment - either pro-tumorigenic or anti-tumorigenic abilities, we aimed to study the effects of TTFields on human MSCs. Methods Human MSCs were isolated from the bone marrow of three different healthy donors and were exposed to TTFields for 72 hours. MSCs’ clonogenic survival, proliferation and viability was analyzed after different TTFields frequencies. Boyden chamber assays were carried out to investigate the influence of TTFields on the migratory potential of MSCs. Flow cytometry analyses of caspase-3 and annexin V were conducted to determine MSCs’ apoptosis rates after TTFields treatment. TTFields-induced senescence was quantified using beta-galactosidase stainings. MSCs’ characteristic surface marker expression (CD73, CD90 and CD105) was studied after TTFields treatment. Result TTFields led to significantly reduced clonogenic survival (70-90% reduction compared to controls) and cellular proliferation (approximately 50% reduction) in all analyzed MSC specimens. However, MSCs’ metabolic viability was largely unaffected after TTFields exposure. Within a range between 100 and 500 kHz, there was no frequency dependence of TTFields’ anti-proliferative effect on human MSCs. As determined by Bodyen Chamber assays, TTFields resulted in a considerable reduction of MSCs’ migratory potential. TTFields increased both cellular apoptosis and senescence in all MSC samples, whereas there was no alteration of MSCs’ characteristic surface marker pattern. Conclusion As TTFields considerably reduce MSCs’ survival and migratory potential, TTFields could attenuate the pro-tumorigenic effects of tumor-associated MSCs that were recently described in glioblastoma patients. Co-culture experiments of MSCs and tumor cells after TTFields treatment as well as in vivo experiments are planned in the future. Citation Format: Alexander Rühle, Maren Strack, Anca-Ligia Grosu, Nils H. Nicolay. Tumor Treating Fields reduce cellular survival of human mesenchymal stromal cells via apoptosis and senescence induction [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 3156.

Abstract 1801: Application of Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) to cancer cells enhances their membrane permeability

Abstract INTRODUCTION: Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) are alternating electric fields at intermediate frequencies that exert anti-mitotic effects on cancerous cells. TTFields therapy is approved in several territories for treatment of glioblastoma (GBM) and unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma. Recently, membrane permeability of GBM cells has been found to be increased in response to TTFields application. The current study aimed to further explore this effect, testing the potential of TTFields to facilitate cellular accumulation of the anticancer agent doxorubicin (DOX) in breast carcinoma cells. METHODS: 4T1 breast mammary carcinoma cells were treated with TTFields (1.7 V/cm RMS) for 72 h across a frequency range (50-500 kHz). Cytotoxicity was examined by cell counts, and permeability determined by 7-aminoactinomycin D (7-AAD) intracellular accumulation, both measured by flow cytometry. Next, TTFields at the frequency inducing highest permeability was applied to chemotherapy-sensitive and matched chemotherapy-resistant cells. Intracellular accumulation of DOX and drug-induced cytotoxicity were measured by flow cytometry. In vivo validation was performed by 72 h delivery of TTFields at the frequency of maximal permeability to mice orthotopically inoculated with 4T1 cells and injected with DOX 24 h before treatment cessation. DOX florescence was measured using in vivo imaging system (IVIS) for whole tumor assessment and flow cytometry for detection at the single-cell level. RESULTS: While highest TTFields-induced cytotoxicity was observed at 150 kHz, 7-AAD intracellular accumulation was maximal at 300 kHz. When TTFields were delivered concomitant with DOX, the drug accumulated to the same extent in chemotherapy-resistant cells as in chemotherapy-sensitive cells. Application of TTFields also sensitized both cell types to DOX, with cytotoxicity observed at low drug concentrations. Furthermore, 2- to 3-fold higher DOX accumulation was seen in tumors isolated from mice treated with TTFields relative to control. CONCLUSIONS: Permeability of 4T1 breast cancer cells was elevated by TTFields, allowing enhanced intracellular accumulation of DOX and improving drug efficacy, even in chemotherapy-resistant cells. Increased cellular accumulation of DOX was also demonstrated in vivo. Citation Format: Bella Koltun, Tali Voloshin, Tal Kan, Lilach Koren, Yaara Porat, Alexandra Volodin, Noa Kaynan, Anat Klein-Goldberg, Rom Paz, Boris Brant, Yiftah Barsheshet, Efrat Zemer-Tov, Adi Haber, Moshe Giladi, Uri Weinberg, Yoram Palti. Application of Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) to cancer cells enhances their membrane permeability [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 1801.

Inconsistencies in Modeling the Efficacy of the Oncolytic Virus HSV1716 Reveal Potential Predictive Biomarkers for Tolerability.

Treatment with HSV1716 via intralesional administration has proven successful for melanoma patients with the hope that oncolytic virotherapy would become another weapon in the systemic anticancer therapy (SACT) arsenal. In addition to challenges surrounding the systemic delivery of oncolytic viruses (OVs), problems associated with its in vivo modeling have resulted in low predictive power, contributing to the observed disappointing clinical efficacy. As OV’s efficacy is elicited through interaction with the immune system, syngeneic orthotopic mouse models offer the opportunity to study these with high reproducibility and at a lower cost; however, inbred animals display specific immune characteristics which may confound results. The systemic delivery of HSV1716 was, therefore, assessed in multiple murine models of breast cancer. Tolerability to the virus was strain-dependent with C57/Bl6, the most tolerant and Balb/c experiencing lethal side effects, when delivered intravenously. Maximum tolerated doses were not enough to demonstrate efficacy against tumor growth rates or survival of Balb/c and FVB mouse models; therefore; the most susceptible strain (Balb/c mice) was treated with immunomodulators prior to virus administration in an attempt to reduce side effects. These studies demonstrate the number of variables to consider when modeling the efficacy of OVs and the complexities involved in their interpretation for translational purposes. By reporting these observations, we have potentially revealed a role for T-cell helper polarization in viral tolerability. Importantly, these findings were translated to human studies, whereby a Th1 cytokine profile was expressed in pleural effusions of patients that responded to HSV1716 treatment for malignant pleural mesothelioma with minimal side effects, warranting further investigation as a biomarker for predictive response.

The Evolving Therapeutic Landscape for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma.

For patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma, prognosis is poor with extremely low 5-year survival rates and limited therapeutic options. Here, we review the current treatment landscape for mesothelioma and highlight promising future therapeutic directions. Evolving frontline therapeutic options for mesothelioma include VEGF inhibition in combination with chemotherapy and dual immune checkpoint inhibition, with synergisms between the therapies and response prediction via biomarkers also being explored. Evolving experimental treatments for mesothelioma include PARP and ALK inhibitors, dendritic and CAR T-cell therapies, anti-mesothelin vaccines, and oncolytic viral therapies, representing timely advances in the field. The therapeutic landscape for malignant pleural mesothelioma is evolving and preferred treatment in the frontline and later settings will likely evolve with it. However, this does not preclude the evidence for including multi-modal therapies spanning angiogenesis and immune checkpoint inhibitors, and biomarker utilization, in current clinical trials and management.