Early reports discussed the prognostic factors of patients with metastatic GIST treated with cytoreductive surgery (CRS). However, the role of C-HIPEC, after CRS, for the treatment of peritoneal metastatic GIST remains unknown. A retrospective analysis of patients with peritoneal metastatic GIST treated with CRS + C-HIPEC combined with targeted therapy from a single institution was performed. C-HIPEC was introduced 1 or more days after CRS, with mitoxantrone, or doxorubicin with cisplatin. Overall survival (OS), and progression free survival (PFS) from time of surgery was determined. One-to-one propensity score matching (PSM) analyses were conducted to balance selection bias. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed using a Cox proportional-hazards model. Between 2007 and 2018, we performed 104 operations on 87 patients with peritoneal metastatic GIST. C-HIPEC was conducted following 35 operations. After a median follow up of 23 months, the median OS and PFS were 40 months and 16 months. After PSM, both C-HIPEC group and non-C-HIPEC group had 28 operations. Either the median OS or PFS was not significantly difference in both groups, with 35 months of C-HIPEC vs 37 months of non-C-HIPEC (HR = 1.22 [95%CI: 0.56-2.67], P = 0.6187),and 13 months in both groups( HR = 0.99 [95%CI: 0.53-1.85], P = 0.9865). Among all patients, 30 days post-operative grade III-IV morbidity rate was 16.3% (C-HIPEC 14.3% and non-C-HIPEC 17.4%, respectively, [P = 0.901]). Multifocal progression, with liver and/or extra-abdominal metastasis, tumor rupture and diameter of resected tumors ≥ 6.5cm were prognostic of worse OS. Multifocal progression, with liver and/or extra-abdominal metastasis and mitotic index >5/50 HPF were associated with worse PFS. C-HIPEC is safe to perform after CRS for metastatic GISTs. However, lacking of infusional regimen of targeted therapy, C-HIPEC using traditional chemotherapy medications did not increase survival benefits compared to CRS alone.
Read full abstract