Treatment Of Femoral Fractures Research Articles

Robot Navigation System Assisted PFNA Fixation of Femoral Intertrochanteric Fractures in the Elderly: A Retrospective Clinical Study.

The incidence of hip fracture in the elderly is increasing. Robot navigation technology has the advantages of minimally invasive and accurate. To explore the difference between the clinical effects of proximal femoral anti-rotation intramedullary nail (PFNA) assisted by robot navigation in the treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fracture and traditional PFNA in the treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fracture in the elderly; analyze the advantages and feasibility of PFNA assisted by robot navigation in the treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fracture in the elderly. From February 2021 to October 2022, the elderly (>65 years old) with femoral intertrochanteric fracture underwent surgery in our center. Divided the patients included in the study into 2 groups based on the surgical method. The surgical method of robot group was PFNA fixation assisted by robot navigation, while the surgical method of traditional group was classic PFNA fixation, Baseline data (general condition, Evans classification, time from injury to operation, preoperative hemoglobin) and observation indicators (intraoperative bleeding, operation time, the length of incision for mail nail insertion, postoperative hemoglobin drop, blood transfusion rate and the Harris score of hip joint 1 year after operation) of the two groups were collected to compare whether there were differences between the two groups. There was no statistical difference in baseline data between the two groups (P>0.05). The intraoperative bleeding in the robot group was 68.17±10.66 mL, the intraoperative bleeding in the traditional group was 174±8.11mL (P<0.001). The operation time in the robot group was 68.81 ± 6.89 min, in the traditional group, the operation time was 76.94 ± 8.18 min (P<0.001). The length of incision for mail nail insertion in the robot group was 3.53 ± 0.63 cm, the length of the incision for mail nail insertion in the traditional group was 4.23 ± 0.71 cm (P<0.001). 5 patients (13.9%) in the robot group received blood transfusion treatment, and 13 patients (36.1%) in the traditional group received blood transfusion treatment (P=0.029). The hemoglobin in the robot group decreased by 14.81 ± 3.27 g/l after operation compared with that before operation, while that in the traditional group decreased by 16.69 ± 3.32 g/l (P=0.018). The Harris score of the hip joint of the affected limb in the robot group was excellent in 25 cases, good in 8 cases and poor in 3 cases one year after the operation; In the traditional group, Harris scores were excellent in 18 cases, good in 11 cases and poor in 7 cases (P=0.021). PFNA fixation of femoral intertrochanteric fracture with robot navigation assistance has the advantages of minimally invasive and accurate, shorter operation time, less bleeding and lower blood transfusion rate than traditional surgical methods, and has certain advantages in reducing postoperative complications of elderly patients.

Comparative Analysis of the Efficacy of Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation and Proximal Femur Bionic Nail in the Treatment of Unstable Elderly Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures

Comparative Analysis of the Efficacy of Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation and Proximal Femur Bionic Nail in the Treatment of Unstable Elderly Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures

Benefits of surgical treatment within 48 h of proximal femoral fracture in centenarians: a retrospective cohort study.

Proximal femoral fractures in aging populations represent a significant concern, with an increasing prevalence among individuals aged ≥100 years. The existing research does not provide robust guidance for clinicians managing older patients aged ≥100 years with proximal femoral fractures. We investigated the safety and efficacy of surgical treatment in patients aged ≥100 years with proximal femoral fractures and evaluated the impact of early surgery on their outcomes. This retrospective cohort study involved 15 patients aged ≥100 years who underwent surgical treatment of proximal femoral fractures; the control group included 137 patients in their 90s. Data were collected between January 2010 and December 2017. Evaluation items included patient characteristics, surgical details, perioperative complication rates, length of hospital stay, the proportion of patients discharged to the same facility or home, rate of regaining walking ability, and 1-year survival rate. The patients aged ≥100 years and those in their 90s had comparable outcomes. Thus, age alone does not dictate surgical success. Early surgery (≤48 h) was associated with trends toward improved perioperative complications, ambulatory ability, and return to original living environment. This study underscores the potential benefits of surgical intervention for proximal femoral fractures in patients aged ≥100 years, indicating the relevance of early surgery (≤48 h). Our findings emphasized the importance of timely intervention and evidence-based decision-making for this demographic. Clinicians, policymakers, and patients could benefit from our insights to enhance fracture management strategies, along with future research endeavors to validate and expand our results in larger multicenter cohorts.

Functional Outcome of Distal Femoral Fractures using NEER Scoring Managed by Distal Femoral Locking Plate versus Retrograde Intramedullary Nail: A Cross-sectional Study

Introduction: Distal femur fractures are a group of fractures that have been a topic of debate for the past decade, were traditionally treated mainly using conservative methods. However, with advancements in surgical techniques and implants, operative intervention has now become the preferred treatment approach. There are various methods for treating distal femur fractures and the present study compares the treatment of distal femoral fracture using distal femur nailing versus the use of locking plate. Aim: To compare the functional outcomes of stabilising distal femur fractures using locking compression plating versus retrograde nailing and to evaluate the merits and drawbacks of each procedure. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional comparative study was conducted in the Department of Orthopaedics at Calcutta National Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India, over a one-year period from (January 2021 to January 2022. Total 46 patients with distal femur fractures were included, with six lost to follow-up. Two groups were divided in which total 20 patients underwent distal femoral nailing, while 20 were treated with distal femoral locking plates. Functional outcomes were assessed using the NEER Score, aiming for perfect restoration of the articular surface, stable fixation, full knee range of motion, and good functional results. Data were entered into a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet for statistical analysis using Statistical Packages for Social Sciences (SPSS) (version 27.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Numerical variables were summarised as mean and standard deviation, while categorical variables were presented as counts and percentages. A p-value of ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The study population consisted of 70% males with a mean age of approximately 55 years. Road traffic accidents were the most common mode of injury. The mean time for radiological union in the nailing group was 14.05 weeks, significantly shorter than the 16 weeks in the plating group. The mean range of knee flexion was 111° in the nailing group and 114.5° in the plating group. The average NEER score was 84.10 for the plating group and 83.30 for the nailing group. There was no statistically significant difference in functional outcomes between the two groups. Conclusion: Both retrograde intramedullary nailing and the use of locking compression plates can be considered as suitable treatment options. Early weight-bearing can be initiated with retrograde nailing. No significant difference was observed in terms of outcome, fracture healing, or NEER score. The time taken for radiological union of fractures using both techniques was comparable. Proper operative planning, execution, and adherence to a strict rehabilitation protocol play crucial roles in the overall patient outcome.

Surgical treatment of peri-implant femoral fractures - case report and literature review

Introduction. Peri-implant femoral fractures (PIFF) are defined as fractures of the femur with the presence of previously implanted non-prosthetic osteosynthetic material. A review of available literature revealed that there are several proposed classifications and sets of guidelines for surgical treatment of PIFF. Case outline. A 49-year-old patient was injured from a fall on the same level, the day before admission to the hospital. The anamnesis at admission showed that six months earlier, he had sustained a pertrochanteric fracture of the left femur, which had been treated surgically with a short cephalomedullary nail. Two years prior to hospital admission, the patient had sustained a tibial plateau fracture of the same leg, which was treated non-surgically with above the knee cast immobilization. After the fracture had healed, paresis of the peroneal nerve was diagnosed, while subsequent follow-up revealed secondary post-traumatic arthrosis of the knee joint. Reduction and fixation of the fracture was performed on a surgical extension table, with the use of fluoroscopy. Previously implanted osteosynthetic material was removed, a short cephalomedullary nail, and fixation of the fracture was carried out with a long cephalomedullary nail. Six months after the operation, the patient can ambulate independently, without assistance. He reports no pain in the left groin and upper leg but reports pain and limitation of movement in the left knee joint. Conclusion. By reviewing the available literature, we found that the patient was cared for in our hospital in keeping with all current recommendations for surgical treatment of this type of fracture.

Functional Outcome of Locking Compression Plate in Distal Femur Fractures

Introduction: Distal femur fracture is common in young people with high velocity injury. Management of distal femur fractures is a therapeutic challenge in orthopedics practice due to its extensive soft tissue injuries, bone loss, comminution, articular extension, instability.Open reduction with internal fixation replaces previous trend of closed conservative management and external fixation. Distal femoral locking compression plate (DF-LCP) requires both locking and compression screw fixation of the femur shaft. DF-LCP has been rapidly adopted as an alternative to intramedullary nails, blade plates and non-locking condylar screw.Materials and Methods: Prospective interventional study was done in department of orthopedics at National Medical College and Teaching Hospital, Birgunj for one year among 45 patients of age more than 18 years with post traumatic closed or open GA Type I, II distal femur fractures, AO Muller type A and C fractures. Ethical approval was obtained from institutional review committee and proper informed consent was taken. Type of implant used was DF-LCP.NEER’S scoring system was used for functional outcome.Results: Out of 45 patients, 42 patients with distal femur fracture were treated by DF-LCP.Three patients lostduring follow up hence removed from study. Out of 42 patients, mean age of the patients was 36.62 years. Most of them 31, (73.8%) were male. Predominant fracture was on right side 29 (69%).The study finding showed that 30 (71.4%) sustained injury due to road traffic accidents. Most of the patients 18 (42.9%) had type A2 fracture according to AO Muller distal femur fracture classification. Complications like surgical site infection observed in 3 cases. 100% union rate achieved with an average union time of 17.26 weeks. On evaluation according to Neer’s criteria mean score was 82.1 (Range: 48-96). Out of 42 patients 24 (57%) had excellent, 14 (33%) had good, 3 (7.2%) had fair and 1 (2.4%) had poor result.Conclusion: The study concluded DF-LCP is effective treatment for distal femur fracture. It provides stable construct for fracture union with excellent functional outcome.

Clinical and radiological outcomes of gunshot-induced femur fractures: a comparative study of monolateral external fixators and hybrid advanced ilizarov method

Aims: Clinical and radiological outcomes, complication rates, and 10-year follow-up results of comminuted femoral open fractures resulting from firearm injuries were evaluated by comparing the Hybrid Advanced Ilizarov method (HAIM) and monolateral external fixator (MEF) of the limb reconstruction system (LRS) for treatment.&#x0D; Methods: Nineteen patients (18 males, 1 female) treated with HAIM and 14 male patients treated with MEF-LRS for femoral comminuted open fractures due to firearm injuries were retrospectively analyzed. Complication rates, pin tract and deep infection rates, time to union, and the need for secondary surgeries were assessed. The Tegner activity score and Short Form-36 (SF-36) were used for comparative evaluation of functional and radiological outcomes and comfort levels with the fixator.&#x0D; Results: There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of age, gender, follow-up duration, time to union, union rate, delayed union, or deep infection. No infections were detected in either group that required a change in the fixation method. There were no significant differences in radiological and functional outcomes between the groups. Significant differences were observed in terms of pin tract infections between the groups. The comfort level of MEF-LRS patients was significantly higher than that of HAIM patients.&#x0D; Conclusion: In the treatment of femoral fractures due to firearm injuries in early and long-term follow-ups, similar complication rates and functional outcomes were achieved for both MEF-LRS and HAIM methods. When considering external fixator preference, MEF-LRS is a better alternative, with a lower rate of pin tract infections and higher patient comfort level.

Should the diameter of the proximal femoral nail be large enough to fill the canal in the treatment of intertrochanteric femoral fracture in patients over fifty?

Many studies have been conducted to evaluate the effects of nail shape, design, or length on the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures. However, the clinical implications of the nail diameter remain unclear. This study was conducted with 191 patients aged ≥ 50years with unilateral intertrochanteric fractures treated with the same type of short cephalomedullary nail and followed for at least oneyear. We recorded the reduction type, tip-apex distance, cortical contact of the nail, and nail/canal diameter ratio (NCR) just distal to the locking screw. The effects of nail diameter on the clinical results were evaluated. The average NCR was 68.7. The average union time was 4.78months. Delayed union or nonunion was seen in 17 patients. Eight patients underwent additional surgery. The mean change in the modified Koval activity score was -0.84. The NCR did not significantly affect the clinical results. Comparisons of cases with NCRs above and below the average and the average - 1 standard deviation revealed no significant difference. The clinical outcome was not related to any variable associated with the nail diameter. With this specific proximal femoral nail, a small diameter relative to that of the femoral canal had no adverse effect on the union of osteoporotic intertrochanteric fractures, even in patients with unstable fractures and those who had unsatisfactory reductions.

Stabilisation of femoral capital physeal fractures using transcervical pinning in cats: 19 cases (2014-2022).

To report the short-term clinical and radiographic outcomes in cats with femoral capital physeal fractures stabilised with transcervical pinning. Medical records of cats diagnosed with femoral capital physeal fractures and treated with transcervical pinning were reviewed. The collected data included signalment, weight, time from lameness to surgery, reported trauma, affected side, concomitant orthopaedic injuries, radiographs, osteoarthritis, femoral neck osteolysis, proximal femoral epiphysis to femoral neck ratio, fracture reduction, implants, complications and clinical evaluation results. An owner questionnaire was used for long-term follow-up. Nineteen cats with a total of 21 fractures met the inclusion criteria. Fifteen of the 19 cats showed no signs of lameness at the 1-month follow-up. Major and catastrophic complications occurred in 9.5% and 23.8% of the fractures, respectively. All catastrophic complications occurred in fractures with a high preoperative osteolysis grade (2 or 3). In our study, transcervical pinning was found to be a reliable fixation method for the treatment of femoral capital physeal fractures in cats with minimal preoperative femoral neck osteolysis. High rates of implant failure with loss of fracture reduction were observed in cats with high-grade preoperative osteolysis.

Outcomes in Early Versus Delayed Management of Pediatric Femoral Shaft Fractures.

There is a paucity of literature regarding the timing of treatment for pediatric femur fractures. The purpose of this study was to analyze whether early versus delayed management of pediatric femoral shaft fractures would impact outcomes regarding time to union and return to baseline function. Pediatric patients presenting with femoral shaft fractures, from January 1, 2010 to January 1, 2021, were identified using the Pediatric Trauma Database at a single Level One Trauma Center and retrospectively reviewed. Demographic information, surgical details, associated injuries, length of follow-up, time to union, and return to baseline function were collected. Patients were then divided into 2 groups; the early intervention group underwent treatment within 24 hours of admission versus the delayed group, which underwent treatment after 24 hours. Patients with neuromuscular disease, pathologic fracture, slipped capital femoral epiphysis, nonambulatory, younger than 6 months old, or had follow-up of <8 weeks posttreatment were excluded. χ 2 and unpaired Student t tests were used to compare outcomes. A P value ≤0.05 was used as the threshold of statistical significance. Of the 169 cases reviewed, 137 met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 8.0 ± 5.0 (6mo to 16y). The average follow-up time was 1.4 ± 1.4 years. Thirty-two (19%) patients did not meet the inclusion criteria and were excluded from the study. One hundred twenty-two (89%) patients were in the early intervention group versus 15 (11%) in the delayed intervention group. There were no statistically significant differences between the early and the delayed arms in regard to time to union, quality of final reduction, and return to baseline function. The findings of this study support that the timing of surgical intervention of femoral shaft fractures in the pediatric population is not correlated to time to union and final function. Clinically, prompt treatment of pediatric femoral shaft fractures should not supersede medical methods of resuscitation and likely has no bearing on the final outcome. Level III.

Comparison of antegrade and retrograde cross pin fixation in the surgical treatment of pediatric supracondylar femur fractures: A biomechanical study

PurposeThe aim of this study is to compare biomechanical stability of Kirschner wires (K-wires) sent with antegrade and retrograde technique in the fixation of pediatric supracondylar femur fractures. Materials and MethodsA transverse fracture model was created two centimeters above the physis in 24 synthetic bone models suitable for the pediatric femur bone structure. The models were randomly divided into two groups as 12 bones each. In the first group (Group 1), 12 bone fracture models were retrogradely fixed with two cross K-wires. In the second group (Group 2), the fracture was fixed antegradely. In Group 2, both wire ends were allowed to protrude three millimeters from the femoral condyles. The stability of the groups was tested biomechanically by exposing them to varus and extension forces. The forces corresponding to 1 mm, 2 mm, 3 mm and 4 mm displacement and failure loads were calculated in two groups. ResultsAccording to the test results regarding displacements and failure loads, the retrograde group was found to be significantly stronger than the antegrade group against varus loads (p < 0.05). When the groups were compared in terms of extension strength, the results of the two groups were similar and there was no statistical difference between them (p > 0.05). ConclusionRetrograde cross K-wires fixation provides a more stable fixation against varus forces. This is important to prevent varus deformity, which is a clinically less tolerable deformity. However, considering that full-weight mobilization of patients is not allowed after surgery in pediatric supracondylar femur fractures, the surgeon should consider that K-wires can also be sent antegrade to decrease the risk of septic arthritis.

Comparison of effectiveness of lower extremity axial distractor and traction table assisted closed reduction and intramedullary nail fixation in femoral subtrochanteric fracture

To compare the effectiveness of lower extremity axial distractor (LEAD) and traction table assisted closed reduction and intramedullary nail fixation in treatment of femoral subtrochanteric fracture. The clinical data of 117 patients with subtrochanteric fracture of femur treated by closed reduction and intramedullary nail fixation between May 2012 and May 2022 who met the selection criteria were retrospectively analyzed. According to the auxiliary reduction tools used during operation, the patients were divided into LEAD group (62 cases with LEAD reduction) and traction table group (55 cases with traction table reduction). There was no significant difference in baseline data, such as gender, age, injured side, cause of injury, fracture Seinsheimer classification, time from injury to operation, and preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score, between the two groups ( P>0.05). Total incision length, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, fluoroscopy frequency, closed reduction rate, fracture reduction quality, fracture healing time, weight-bearing activity time, and incidence of complications, as well as hip flexion and extension range of motion (ROM), Harris score, and VAS score at 1 month and 6 months after operation and last follow-up were recorded and compared between the two groups. There were 14 cases in the LEAD group from closed reduction to limited open reduction, and 43 cases in the traction table group. The incisions in the LEAD group healed by first intention, and no complication such as nerve and vascular injury occurred during operation. In the traction table group, 3 cases had perineal crush injury, which recovered spontaneously in 1 week. The total incision length, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, fluoroscopy frequency, and closed reduction rate in the LEAD group were significantly better than those in the traction table group ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the quality of fracture reduction between the two groups ( P>0.05). Patients in both groups were followed up 12-44 months, with an average of 15.8 months. In the LEAD group, 1 patient had delayed fracture union at 6 months after operation, 1 patient had nonunion at 3 years after operation, and 1 patient had incision sinus pus flow at 10 months after operation. In the traction table group, there was 1 patient with fracture nonunion at 15 months after operation. X-ray films of the other patients in the two groups showed that the internal fixator was fixed firmly without loosening and the fractures healed. There was no significant difference in fracture healing time, weight bearing activity time, incidence of complications, and postoperative hip flexion and extension ROM, Harris score, and VAS score at different time points between the two groups ( P>0.05). For femoral subtrochanteric fracture treated by close reduction and intramedullary nail fixation, compared with traction table, LEAD assisted fracture reduction can significantly shorten the operation time, reduce intraoperative blood loss and fluoroscopy frequency, reduce incision length, effectively improve the success rate of closed reduction, and avoid complications related to traction table reduction. It provides a new method for good reduction of femoral subtrochanteric fracture.

The results of treatment of femoral diaphysis fractures using locked intramedullary osteosynthesis and extramedullary osteosynthesis (results for 10 years)

Background. Femoral diaphysis fractures are one of the most common and significant injuries to the bones of the limbs. Locked intramedullary osteosynthesis makes it possible to reduce the injury rate of the surgery and its length, as well as to carry out early rehabilitation of patients. The aim of the study. To conduct a continuous retrospective single-purpose comparative study of the results of treatment of patients with femoral diaphysis fractures treated with locked intramedullary osteosynthesis and extramedullary osteosynthesis for 10 years. This study did not include patients with double femoral fractures treated by osteosynthesis using a combination of two implants – locked intramedullary implant and extramedullary implant. Material and methods. We conducted a retrospective study of the results of treatment of patients from 2011 to 2020. During this period, we treated 794 patients aged from 16 to 77 years with femoral diaphysis fractures. The share of people of working age was 75 %. The patients were divided into two groups depending on the method of surgical treatment. Group 1 included 500 patients who had surgical treatment using locked intramedullary osteosynthesis. Group 2 included 294 patients who had surgical treatment using extramedullary osteosynthesis. Results. In patients of group 1 treated with locked intramedullary osteosynthesis, good anatomical and functional treatment results were achieved in 70 % of cases; satisfactory treatment results – in 25.2 % of cases, unsatisfactory results – in 4.8 %. In the group 2, good results were achieved in 61.9 % of cases, satisfactory – in 29.6 %, unsatisfactory – in 8.5 %. Conclusion. The obtained results of treatment of femoral diaphysis fractures show the undeniable advantage of using locked intramedullary osteosynthesis compared to extramedullary osteosynthesis.

Open Reduction and Internal Fixation for Vancouver B1 and B2 Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures: A Proportional Meta-Analysis.

Periprosthetic femoral fracture (PFF) is a common complication after total hip arthroplasty, and open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is a common surgical treatment. We conducted a meta-analysis to compare the outcomes of ORIF in patients with different fracture patterns (Vancouver B1 and B2). We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and KoreaMed from inception to August 2022. We conducted a pair-wise meta-analysis (with a fixed-effects model) on the 10 comparative studies and a proportional meta-analysis on the data from the 39 articles to determine a consensus. The outcomes were the incidence of reoperations that included osteosynthesis, irrigation/debridement and revision arthroplasty. The pair-wise meta-analysis showed similar outcomes between two groups; the risk of reoperation (odds ratio [OR]=0.82, confidence interval [CI] 0.43-1.55, P=0.542), nonunion (OR=0.49; CI 0.22-1.10, P=0.085) and deep infection (OR=1.89, CI 0.48-7.46, P=0.361). In proportion meta-analysis, pooled prevalence of reoperation was 9% (95% CI, 6-12) in B1 and 8% (95% CI, 2-15) in B2 (heterogeneity between two groups (Q), P=0.772). The pooled prevalence of nonunion was same as of 4% in B1 and B2 (Q, P=0.678), and deep infection was 2% (95% CI, 1-3) in B1 and 4% (95% CI, 2-7) in B2 (Q, P=0.130). ORIF is a feasible treatment for B1 and B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures, with acceptable outcomes in terms of, nonunion and infection. The results of this study would help clinicians and provide baseline data for further studies validating PFF.

A Comparative Study of Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty for Intertrochanteric Fracture: Direct Anterior Approach versus Conventional Posterolateral Approach.

The aim of this study was to compare short-term results from use of the direct anterior approach (DAA) and the conventional posterolateral approach (PLA) in performance of bipolar hemiarthroplasty for treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients. A retrospective review of 100 patients with intertrochanteric fractures who underwent bipolar hemiarthroplasty was conducted. The PLA was used in 50 cases from 2016 to 2019; since that time we have used the DAA in 50 cases from 2019 to 2021. Measurements of mean operative time, blood loss, hospitalization period, and ambulation status, greater trochanter (GT) migration and stem subsidence were performed. And the incidence of complications was examined. Operative time was 73.60±14.56 minutes in the PLA group and 79.80±8.89 minutes in the DAA group (P<0.05). However, after experiencing 20 cases using DAA, there was no statistically difference in operative time between two groups (P=0.331). Blood loss was 380.76±180.67 mL in the PLA group and 318.14±138.51 mL in the DAA group (P<0.05). The hospitalization was 23.76±11.89 days in the PLA group and 21.45±4.18 days in the DAA group (P=0.207). In both groups, there were no progressive GT migration, intraoperative fractures or dislocations, although there was one case of infection in the PLA group. Although use of the DAA in performance of bipolar hemiarthroplasty required slightly more time in the beginning compared with the PLA, the DAA may well be an alternative, safe surgical technique as a muscle preserving procedure in elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures.

Nail Plate Constructs are Associated with Decreased Rates of Reoperation in Complex Distal Femur Fractures.

To determine if nail plate constructs have lower rates of reoperation to promote bone healing than lateral locking plates in the treatment of distal femur fractures. Retrospective Cohort. Single Level 1 trauma centerPatients/Participants: 312 consecutive patients treated operatively for native distal femur fractures (OTA/AO 33A or 33C). Reduction and fixation of distal femur fractures with either a lateral locked plate (LLP) or a nail plus plate construct (NPC). reoperation to promote bone healing at any time after definitive fixation. 279 fractures were treated with LLP and were compared with and 33 fractures treated with NPC constructs. Patient demographics, injury severity score (ISS), and frequency utilization of each construct between different types of OTA/AO classified distal femur fractures were similar. The reoperation rate to promote bone healing was 18.7% (51/273) for LLPs, and 3% (1/33) for NPC constructs. There was no significant difference in surgical site infection (SSI) (p = 0.67). Utilization of NPC technique demonstrated a significant decrease in rates of reoperation to promote bone healing compared to LLP alone in the treatment of OTA/AO 33A and 33C distal femur fractures. Augmented fixation with NPCs should be considered to treat complex distal femur fractures as it is associated with lower rates of reoperation to promote bone healing in comparison to LLP. Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Predictive factors for reoperation after periprosthetic femoral fracture: A retrospective multicenter (TRON) study

BackgroundThe surgical treatment of periprosthetic femoral fracture (PFF) can be technically demanding and it is associated with high rates of complications and repeat surgery. However, repeat surgery is uncommon and few studies have examined survival and the functional prognosis following reoperation after the surgical treatment of PFF. We aimed to estimate the rate of reoperation for any reason, to determine the survival rate after reoperation for PFF, and to identify predictors associated with reoperation after PFF surgery in a multicenter (TRON group) study. MethodsTwo hundred forty-six patients were admitted for treatment of PFF. After excluding patients managed conservatively and those with Vancouver type A fracture, we analyzed 184 patients. Unadjusted risk ratios (RRs) were calculated, and multiple logistic regression was used to calculate adjusted RRs. We used the Kaplan-Meier method to create survival curves and a log-rank test to determine survival from the date of repeat surgery. ResultsFifteen of the 184 patients (8.2 %) underwent reoperation after PFF surgery. The 1-year survival rate after reoperation for PFF was 66.7 % (11 of 15). Vancouver B3 and Vancouver C were identified as independent risk factors for reoperation after PFF surgery (Vancouver B3: Risk ratio [RR] 19.0, 95 % CI 1.10–329 P < 0.001; Vancouver C: RR 13.3, 95 % CI 1.4–123.0, P = 0.023). ConclusionThe reoperation rate after PFF surgery and the mortality after reoperation PFF surgery were relatively high. The fracture type is associated with reoperation after PFF surgery.

Analysis of Porous Compression Plate having Different Lattice Structures with different Material Properties for Proximal Femoral Fractures

Abstract: Proximal femoral fractures, which frequently affect the elderly, provide a significant problem in orthopaedic surgery that calls for creative treatments. This study focuses on the thorough examination of porous compression plates intended to treat these fractures that have different lattice structures of Gyroid, Schwarz D, Schwarz P and material properties. The research examines the mechanical behaviour of these implants using finite element analysis (FEA) simulations, as well as the impact of lattice parameters and material selections on deformation, stress distribution and strain. The results provide crucial information for selecting the best implants, which could alter the treatment of proximal femoral fractures by improving patient outcomes, lowering complications, and developing orthopaedic surgery. Schwarz P lattice structure was found to be best in case of Ti-6Al4V while Schwarz D lattice structure was best for 316L SS.

History of proximal femur fractures in the German literature.

German-speaking surgeons have left a deep imprint on the history of diagnostics and treatment of proximal femur fractures. Some of the studies published in German have fell into oblivion, others are cited until today, although sometimes quite inaccurately. The cause of such inaccuracies are citations from secondary sources due to unavailability of the original or inability to read it because of a language barrier. In the current literature, globally predominated by English articles, the "German history" of treatment of proximal femur fractures remains undervalued. The aim of the present article is to point out its contribution. Literature search was performed in original publications and historical sources. The German-speaking surgeons have considerably contributed to the development of the treatment of proximal femur fractures. The analyzed period between 1847 and 1970 may be divided into three basic periods. In the first period (1847-1896), the German-speaking surgeons (Langenbeck, Trendelenburg, König, Heine, Dolinger)were the first worldwide to start treating the fractures of proximal femur operatively. In the second period (1897-1935),mainly in the 1930s,the initiative in Europe was taken over by surgeons publishing studies in Franceand in Belgium. Overseas, American surgeons were coming to the forefront. In Germany, onlyPauwels developed the first biomechanical classification of femoral neck fractures. In the third period (1936-1970), mainly in the 1940s and 1950s, implants were designed (Pohl, Künstcher), based on close collaboration betweenGermanengineers and surgeons, that served as a model for a dynamic hip screw and a proximal femoral nail, which are currently the implants of choice in the treatment of trochanteric fractures. The historical contribution ofGerman-speaking surgeons to understanding the issue of proximal femur fractures and their operative treatment is far more significant than presented in the historical studies published in English.

Biomechanics of PHILOS plates in Vancouver B1 periprosthetic femoral fracture.

Objective: To investigate the clinical efficacy of PHILOS plates in the treatment of Vancouver B1 periprosthetic femoral fracture (PFF) and to validate its biomechanical reliability via finite element analysis and mechanical testing on the Synbone femoral models. Methods: Ten males and eight females with Vancouver B1 PFF who underwent PHILOS plate fixation between September 2017 and January 2022 were selected. The average age was 72.61 ± 8.19years, with a range of 57-86years old. X-ray films were taken to assess the fracture healing situation around the femoral prosthesis as well as the position of the PHILOS plates and femoral prosthesis. Two different plates (the PHILOS plate and the Cable GTR plate) were used for fixation, and the differences in biomechanical stability of the two fixation methods were compared using finite element analysis and mechanical testing on the Synbone femoral models to validate the biomechanical dependability of the PHILOS plate. Results: All 18 cases were followed for at least 1year, as a result. The average period of follow-up was 17months, ranging from 12 to 36months. At the most recent follow-up, Harris scores for the hip joints of patients ranged from 82 to 89, with an average score of 86. The X-rays revealed that all fractures surrounding the femoral prosthesis had healed and that there was no looseness in the femoral prosthesis. None of the PHILOS license plates had expired. All patients were able to perform full-load walking, and pain and claudication in affected limbs were significantly reduced. Finite element analysis and mechanical testing of the Synbone femoral model revealed that the fixation effect of the PHILOS group was superior to that of the Cable group; consequently, PHILOS plates can be used to effectively fix fractures around the proximal femoral prosthesis. Conclusion: PHILOS plates are initially used in the treatment of Vancouver B1 PFF, which may be a good choice due to their simpler operation, lower medical costs, and satisfactory clinical efficacy.