Treatment Of Early-stage Breast Cancer Research Articles

Cost-benefit ratio of modern medical education using micro-costing: amodel calculation using the example of an innovative breast brachytherapy workshop.

Radiation oncology is an essential component of therapeutic oncology and necessitates well-trained personnel. Multicatheter brachytherapy (MCBT) is one radiotherapeutic option for early-stage breast cancer treatment. However, specialized hands-on training for MCBT is not currently included in the curriculum for residents. Arecently developed hands-on brachytherapy workshop has demonstrated promising results in enhancing knowledge and practical skills. Nevertheless, these simulation-based teaching formats necessitate more time and financial resources. Our analyses include computational models for the implementation and delivery of this workshop and can serve as abasis for similar educational initiatives. This study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of apreviously developed and evaluated breast brachytherapy simulation workshop. Using amicro-costing approach, we estimated costs at adetailed level by considering supplies, soft- and hardware, and personnel time for each task. This method also allows for acomprehensive evaluation of the costs associated with implementing new medical techniques. The workshop costs were divided into two categories: development and workshop execution. The cost analysis was conducted on aper-participant basis, and the impact on knowledge improvement was measured using aquestionnaire. The total workshop costs were determined by considering the initial workshop setup expenses including the development and conceptualization of the course with all involved collaborators, as well as the costs incurred for each individual course. The workshop was found to be financially efficient, with aper-participant cost of € 39, considering the industrial sponsorship provided for brachytherapy equipment. In addition, we assessed the workshop's efficacy by analyzing participant feedback using Likert scale evaluations. The findings indicated anotable enhancement in both theoretical and practical skills among the participants. Moreover, the cost-to-benefit ratio (CBFR) analysis demonstrated aCBFR of € 13.53 for each Likert point increment. The hands-on brachytherapy workshop proved to be avaluable and approximately cost-effective educational program, leading to asignificant enhancement in the knowledge and skills of the participants. Without the support of industrial sponsorship, the costs would have been unattainable.

Preoperative single-dose camrelizumab and/or microwave ablation in women with early-stage breast cancer: A window-of-opportunity trial

Immune checkpoint blockade has shown low responserates for advanced breast cancer, and combination strategiesareneeded. Microwave ablation (MWA) may be a triggerofantitumor immunity. This window-of-opportunity trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04805736) was conducted to determine the safetyand feasibility of preoperative camrelizumab (an anti-PD-1 antibody) combined with MWA in the treatment of early-stage breast cancer. Sixty participants were randomized to preoperatively receive single-dose camrelizumab alone (n= 20), MWA alone (n= 20), or camrelizumab+MWA (n= 20). A random number table was used to allocate interventions. The primary outcome was the safety and feasibility of MWA combined with camrelizumab. Camrelizumab and MWA were well tolerated alone and in combination without delays in prescheduled surgery. No treatment-related grade III/IV adverse events were observed. Different from in the single-dose camrelizumab or MWA group, participants showed stable counts of blood cells after combination therapy. After combination therapy, peripheral CD8+ Tcells showed enhanced cytotoxic and effect-memory functions. Clonal expansional CD8+ Tcells showed higher cytotoxic activity and effector memory- and tumor-specific signatures than emergent clones after combination therapy. Enhanced interactions between clonal expansional CD8+ Tcells and monocytes were observed, suggesting that monocytes contributed to the enhanced functions of clonal expansional CD8+ Tcells. Major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I-related pathways and interferon signaling pathways were activated in monocytes by combination therapy. Camrelizumab combined with MWA was feasible for early-stage breast cancer. Peripheral CD8+ Tcells were activated after combination therapy, dependent on monocytes with activated MHC class I pathways. This study was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20230017).

Omission of radiation therapy after breast conserving surgery for older women at low-risk of local recurrence: One option among many

This editorial discusses the evolving landscape of early-stage breast cancer treatment, emphasizing the need to tailor therapies based on disease biology and genomic approaches. The focus is on the reconsideration of postoperative radiation therapy (RT) for older patients with low-risk, hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer. Recent trials show modest long-term local recurrence rates with the omission of RT after BCS in certain cases, challenging the traditional approach. The commentary calls for continued research on predictive tests for treatment response and advocates for a multidisciplinary approach to decision-making, considering factors like quality of life. The nuanced risk/benefit ratio of RT in older patients is explored, emphasizing the importance of comprehensive assessment for optimal therapy.

Abstract B077: Subtype-specific signaling dynamics during treatment in non-responding breast cancer patients in the neoadjuvant I-SPY2 TRIAL: are there clues on how to overcome resistance?

Abstract Background: Despite ever-improving treatments (Tx) for early-stage aggressive breast cancer – e.g., neoadjuvant platinum and immune agents (IO) for TN and dual-anti-HER2 for HER2+ - many patients don’t respond, and insight into resistance mechanisms and how to overcome them are lacking. To look for clues, we performed serial gene expression profiling of non-responding patients to assess which tumor features change during treatment, and to identify dynamics most associated with distant recurrence. Methods: Non-response was defined as moderate or extensive residual cancer burden after Tx. 167 non-responders [76 HR+HER2-, 72 TN, 19 HER2+] with mRNA at one or more on-treatment time points (148 pretreatment (T0), 122 on-treatment (T1), and 120 surgical (T3)) were considered. Normalized data were scored for 112 published signatures representing immune, proliferation, ER/PR, HER2-related, ECM, and development; and for 50 Cancer Hallmarks (MSigDB). Signatures were assessed for early (T1-T0), late (T3-T1) and overall (T3-T0) changes during Tx using Wilcoxon tests, adjusted using the Benjamini-Hochberg method (BH p<0.05). 110/167 (66%) pts have distant recurrence free survival (DRFS) data, with median follow-up of ~4.5yr. Associations with DRFS were assessed using Cox Proportional Hazards modeling, also adjusted (BH log rank test p<0.05). Results: Signaling dynamics during Tx differed by receptor subtype. Within HR+HER2-, in addition to a decrease in ESR1_PGR, early decreases in proliferation and interferon (but not T/B-cell) signatures were observed; along with late increases in TGFB, IL8 and IL2, and Mast-cell. In TN, late decreases in T/B-cell, and Tumor-Immune signaling were observed, including those predicting IO sensitivity (STAT1_sig, DendriticCell and Chemokine12). Among the few signaling changes in common between subtypes were early increases in xenobiotic metabolism and late increases in hypoxia. Associations with DRFS were subtype-specific as well. In HR+HER2-, high levels of proliferation at T3 associate with decreased DRFS, and late increases in macrophage and Th1-related immune signatures associated with improved DRFS. Paradoxically, though high Mast-cell at T0 were previously shown to associate with non-pCR, high levels at T3 and increases late in Tx associate with improved DRFS. In TN, there were few significant associations with DRFS. Finally, we assessed the overlap between signatures that change during treatment and those that associate with DRFS, and to our surprise found no significant association. Conclusion: We observed subtype-specific changes in signatures over Tx in non-responders, however these changes do not generally predict an association with DRFS. Early targeting of xenobiosis; or TGFB, IL2 or IL8 in HR+HER2-, may be promising for overcoming resistance; but likely not a Mast-cell inhibitor, where high levels predict both resistance and survival. Citation Format: Denise M. Wolf, Christina Yau, Mark Jesus M. Magbanua, Rosalyn Sayaman, Julia Wulfkhule, Rosa I. Gallagher, Lamorna Brown-Swigart, Michael J. Campbell, Amrita Basu, Gillian L. Hirst, Jane Perlmutter, Angela DeMichele, Doug Yee, Lajos Pusztai, Paula R. Pohlmann, Amy S. Clark, Hope S. Rugo, Emanuel F. Petricoin, Laura J. Esserman, Laura van ‘t Veer. Subtype-specific signaling dynamics during treatment in non-responding breast cancer patients in the neoadjuvant I-SPY2 TRIAL: are there clues on how to overcome resistance? [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Advances in Breast Cancer Research; 2023 Oct 19-22; San Diego, California. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(3 Suppl_1):Abstract nr B077.

Ultrasound-based radiomics nomogram for predicting axillary lymph node metastasis in early-stage breast cancer.

We aimed at assessing the predictive ability of ultrasound-based radiomics combined with clinical characteristics for axillary lymph node (ALN) status in early-stage breast cancer patients and to compare performance in different peritumoral regions. A total of 755 patients (527 in the primary cohort and 228 in the external validation cohort) were enrolled in this study. Ultrasound images for all patients were acquired and radiomics analysis performed for intratumoral and different peritumoral regions. The MRMR and LASSO regression analyses were performed on extracted features from the primary cohort to construct a radiomics signature formula combined with clinical characteristics. Pearson's coefficient and the variance inflation factor (VIF) were performed to check the correlation and the multicollinearity among the final predictors. The best performing model was selected to develop a nomogram, which was established by performing binary logistic regression and acquiring cut-off values based on the corresponding nomogram scores of the masses. Among all the radiomics models, the "Mass + Margin3mm" model exhibited the best performance. The areas under the curves (AUC) of the nomogram in the primary and external validation cohorts were 0.906 (95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.882-0.930) and 0.922 (95% CI 0.894-0.960), respectively. They both showed good calibrations. The nomogram exhibited a good ability to discriminate between positive and negative lymph nodes (AUC: 0.853 (95% CI 0.816-0.889) in primary cohort, 0.870 (95% CI 0.818-0.922) in validation cohort), and between low-volume and high-volume lymph nodes (AUC: 0.832 (95% CI 0.781-0.884) in primary cohort, 0.911 (95% CI 0.858-0.964) in validation cohort). The established nomogram is a prospective clinical prediction tool for non-invasive assessment of ALN status. It has the ability to enhance the accuracy of early-stage breast cancer treatment.

Combined modality treatment of early breast cancer. Literature review

The object of the study was to conduct a systematic literature review on combined modality treatment for early-stage breast cancer using postoperative and intraoperative radiation therapy, and consider new treatment approaches for early breast cancer.Material and Methods. The search for sources relevant to the review topic was carried out in the Medline, Cochrane Library, and Elibrary systems. A total of 905 studies on combination treatments for early breast cancer were identified, of which 43 were included in the review.Results. Data analysis showed that the rate of local relapses in early breast cancer was lower in patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery in combination with adjuvant radiation therapy than in patients without adjuvant radiation therapy. Research is ongoing on radiotherapy deintensification using intraoperative radiation therapy for patients at low risk of recurrence. Ongoing clinical trials support the omission of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery for elderly women with hormone receptor-positive early-stage breast cancer, who receive adjuvant endocrine therapy. Understanding the characteristics of the tumor process will allow us to personalize the treatment of patients with early breast cancer, reduce the risk of local relapses, and avoid unnecessary treatment-related complications.Conclusion. To improve survival in breast cancer patients is only possible by maximizing the tumor control. The effectiveness of adjuvant radiation therapy, which is an integral component in the combined modality treatment of early breast cancer, has been proven. However, third-generation studies discuss the feasibility of identifying a low-risk group of patients with a favorable clinical prognosis, who receive adequate endocrine therapy, and additional radiation do not provide a significant survival benefit.

Inflammatory breast cancer: As surgical oncologists, what can we do?

Breast cancer surgery is the primary treatment for early-stage breast cancer. However, inflammatory breast cancer (IBC), with its specific presentation characterized by skin invasion, is unfit for primary surgery. According to the different guidelines, the management of IBC is trimodal with the coordination of oncologists, surgeons, and radiation therapists. Advances in breast cancer imaging and the development of more targeted therapies make new challenges for this aggressive cancer. This chapter aims to provide an update on the role of surgery in IBC. Radical surgery is still considered the standard surgical treatment in IBC. Some authors suggest a conservative surgery in patients with a clinical response to chemotherapy without affecting survival. For lymph node surgery, the sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is not feasible in IBC patients, according to the existing studies. However, prospective studies on SLNB are needed to verify its reliability after chemotherapy for a specific group of patients. In the metastatic IBC, surgery can be considered if there is a good response after chemotherapy or for uncontrolled symptoms. Existing studies showed that surgery may impact survival for these patients. Prospective studies are mandatory to optimize IBC management, considering factors such as tumor's molecular profile.

Predicting Neoadjuvant Treatment Response in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Using Machine Learning.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is the standard treatment for early-stage triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). The primary endpoint of NAC is a pathological complete response (pCR). NAC results in pCR in only 30-40% of TNBC patients. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), Ki67 and phosphohistone H3 (pH3) are a few known biomarkers to predict NAC response. Currently, systematic evaluation of the combined value of these biomarkers in predicting NAC response is lacking. In this study, the predictive value of markers derived from H&E and IHC stained biopsy tissue was comprehensively evaluated using a supervised machine learning (ML)-based approach. Identifying predictive biomarkers could help guide therapeutic decisions by enabling precise stratification of TNBC patients into responders and partial or non-responders. Serial sections from core needle biopsies (n = 76) were stained with H&E and immunohistochemically for the Ki67 and pH3 markers, followed by whole-slide image (WSI) generation. The serial section stains in H&E stain, Ki67 and pH3 markers formed WSI triplets for each patient. The resulting WSI triplets were co-registered with H&E WSIs serving as the reference. Separate mask region-based CNN (MRCNN) models were trained with annotated H&E, Ki67 and pH3 images for detecting tumor cells, stromal and intratumoral TILs (sTILs and tTILs), Ki67+, and pH3+ cells. Top image patches with a high density of cells of interest were identified as hotspots. Best classifiers for NAC response prediction were identified by training multiple ML models and evaluating their performance by accuracy, area under curve, and confusion matrix analyses. Highest prediction accuracy was achieved when hotspot regions were identified by tTIL counts and each hotspot was represented by measures of tTILs, sTILs, tumor cells, Ki67+, and pH3+ features. Regardless of the hotspot selection metric, a complementary use of multiple histological features (tTILs, sTILs) and molecular biomarkers (Ki67 and pH3) resulted in top ranked performance at the patient level. Overall, our results emphasize that prediction models for NAC response should be based on biomarkers in combination rather than in isolation. Our study provides compelling evidence to support the use of ML-based models to predict NAC response in patients with TNBC.

Women's Preferences for Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Treatment of Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Discrete Choice Experiment

IntroductionThe primary treatment recommended for early-stage breast cancer is breast conserving surgery followed by external beam radiation therapy of the whole breast. Previously radiation therapy for early-stage breast cancer was given using more fractions over longer durations. Guidelines support treatments with fewer fractions over a shorter time (hypofractionated radiation therapy-HFRT). This study aimed to understand women's preferences for different features of treatments for early-stage breast cancer. MethodsA discrete choice experiment (DCE) with 12 choice tasks was conducted, describing the treatments by: extent of surgery, duration of radiation treatment, need to relocate for treatment, local side effects, changes in breast appearance, costs, and difficulty with daily activities during and after treatment. Participants were women with breast cancer and from the general population. Mixed logit analyses were conducted and trade-offs between attributes estimated. Results420 respondents completed the DCE. The relative importance of attributes varied by respondent characteristics; the most influential attribute for younger women was type of surgery (breast conserving surgery); type of surgery did not influence older women's preferences. Shorter treatment duration, avoiding relocation, fewer local side effects, and less difficulty with daily activities all positively influenced treatment preference. Younger women were willing to accept 32-40 days of radiation treatment before a treatment that included mastectomy was potentially acceptable. Conclusionattributes of treatment such as duration, need for relocation, side effects and impacts on normal daily activities during and after treatment significantly influenced women's preference for treatment, including surgery. Our findings have the potential for real impact for patients and services including supporting one on one clinical discussions, supporting program and patient resource development, and by informing service funding, organisation and delivery.

Comparison of Circulating Tumor DNA Assays for Molecular Residual Disease Detection in Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Detection of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in patients who have completed treatment for early-stage breast cancer is associated with a high risk of relapse, yet the optimal assay for ctDNA detection is unknown. The cTRAK-TN clinical trial prospectively used tumor-informed digital PCR (dPCR) assays for ctDNA molecular residual disease (MRD) detection in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer. We compared tumor-informed dPCR assays with tumor-informed personalized multimutation sequencing assays in 141 patients from cTRAK-TN. MRD was first detected by personalized sequencing in 47.9% of patients, 0% first detected by dPCR, and 52.1% with both assays simultaneously (P < 0.001; Fisher exact test). The median lead time from ctDNA detection to relapse was 6.1 months with personalized sequencing and 3.9 months with dPCR (P = 0.004, mixed-effects Cox model). Detection of MRD at the first time point was associated with a shorter time to relapse compared with detection at subsequent time points (median lead time 4.2 vs. 7.1 months; P = 0.02). Personalized multimutation sequencing assays have potential clinically important improvements in clinical outcome in the early detection of MRD.

Association of clinicopathologic variables and patient preference with the choice of surgical treatment for early-stage breast cancer: A registry-based study

IntroductionObservational studies suggest that breast conserving surgery (BCS) and radiotherapy (RT) offers superior survival compared to mastectomy. The aim was to compare patient and tumour characteristics in women with invasive breast cancer ≤30 mm treated with either BCS or mastectomy, and to explore the underlying reason for choosing mastectomy. MethodsWomen registered with breast cancer ≤30 mm and ≤4 positive axillary lymph nodes in the Swedish National Breast Cancer Register 2013–2016 were included. Logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the association of tumour and patient characteristics with receiving a mastectomy vs. BCS. ResultsOf 1860 breast cancers in 1825 women, 1346 were treated by BCS and 514 by mastectomy. Adjuvant RT was given to 1309 women (97.1 %) after BCS and 146 (27.6 %) after mastectomy. Variables associated with receiving a mastectomy vs. BCS included clinical detection (Odds Ratio (OR) 4.15 (95 % Confidence Interval (CI) 3.35–5.14)) and clinical stage (T2 vs. T1 (OR 3.68 (95 % CI 2.90–4.68)), N1 vs. N0 (OR 2.02 (95 % CI 1.38–2.96)). Women receiving mastectomy more often had oestrogen receptor negative, HER2 positive tumours of higher histological grade. The most common reported reason for mastectomy was large or multifocal tumours (53.5 %), followed by patient preference (34.5 %). ConclusionChoice of surgery is strongly associated with key prognostic factors among women undergoing BCS with RT compared to mastectomy. Failure to control for all relevant confounders may bias results in outcome studies in favour of BCS.

Assessing the Clinical Efficacy and Effectiveness of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Combined with Breast-Conserving Surgery for Early-Stage Breast Cancer

Objective: To analyze the impact of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) combined with breast-conserving surgery in the clinical treatment of early-stage breast cancer. Methods: 80 patients with early-stage breast cancer admitted to the Second Department of Breast Surgery at Dezhou Second People’s Hospital from September 2020 to September 2022 were selected and randomly divided into a control group and an observation group using the random number table method, with 40 cases in each group. The control group underwent a modified radical mastectomy, while the observation group underwent SLNB combined with breast-conserving surgery. The surgical efficacy and prognosis between the two groups were compared. Results: The observation group exhibited shorter operation, hospitalization, and extubation times, as well as less intraoperative blood loss and drainage volume, all of which were significantly better than those in the control group (P &lt; 0.05). Additionally, the observation group demonstrated a higher rate of excellent breast cosmetology and quality of life, with lower complication incidence, significantly outperforming the control group (P &lt; 0.05). There was no statistical difference in the metastasis rate and recurrence rate between the two groups (P &gt; 0.05). Conclusion: The combination of SLNB and breast-conserving surgery proves highly effective for patients with early-stage breast cancer, presenting fewer complications and enhancing both breast cosmetic outcomes and quality of life.

Facts and Hopes in Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy: Current Approvals and Emerging Evidence.

In 2021 and 2022, two immune checkpoint inhibitors received FDA approval in the neoadjuvant setting for the treatment of early-stage triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Several more studies have since indicated the benefits, and challenges, of administering neoadjuvant immunotherapy prior to definitive surgery in the gastrointestinal, head and neck, and cutaneous realms. In addition, numerous ongoing phase II and phase III trials are investigating outcomes of neoadjuvant immune treatment in early-stage disease. As such, it is anticipated that more immune checkpoint inhibitors will receive approval for various neoadjuvant indications in the next several years. Medical oncologists, surgeons, and other providers in a multidisciplinary cancer care team will be presented with alternate treatment paradigms and clinical decisions regarding upfront surgery versus neoadjuvant treatment. Here, we describe the current evidence supporting use of immune checkpoint inhibitors for neoadjuvant treatment, ongoing studies, and clinical considerations of this treatment approach.

16P Patient and healthcare practitioner preferences in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer treatment: A discrete choice experiment

16P Patient and healthcare practitioner preferences in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer treatment: A discrete choice experiment

A Retrospective Exploratory Analysis for Serum Extracellular Vesicles Reveals APRIL (TNFSF13), CXCL13, and VEGF-A as Prognostic Biomarkers for Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is widely used as a standard treatment for early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). While patients who achieve pathologic complete response (pCR) have a highly favorable outcome, patients who do not achieve pCR have variable prognoses. It is important to identify patients who are most likely to have poor survival outcomes to identify candidates for more aggressive therapeutic approaches after NAC. Many studies have demonstrated that cytokines and growth factors packaged into extracellular vesicles (EVs) have an essential role in tumor progression and drug resistance. In this study, we examined the role of serum-derived EV-associated cytokines as prognostic biomarkers for long-term outcomes in patients who underwent anthracycline-taxane-based NAC. We isolated extracellular vesicles from the serum of 190 TNBC patients who underwent NAC between 2015 and 2018 at Samsung Medical Center. EV-associated cytokine concentrations were measured with ProcartaPlex Immune Monitoring 65-plex panels. The prognostic value of EV-associated cytokines was studied. We found that patients with high EV_APRIL, EV_CXCL13, and EV_VEGF-A levels had shorter overall survival (OS). We further evaluated the role of these selected biomarkers as prognostic factors in patients with residual disease (RD) after NAC. Even in patients with RD, high levels of EV_APRIL, EV_CXCL13, and EV_VEGF-A were correlated with poor OS. In all subgroup analyses, EV_CXCL13 overexpression was significantly associated with poor overall survival. Moreover, multivariate analysis indicated that a high level of EV_CXCL13 was an independent predictor of poor OS. Correlation analysis between biomarker levels in EVs and serum showed that EV_VEGF-A positively correlated with soluble VEGF-A but not CXCL13. An elevated level of soluble VEGF-A was also associated with poor OS. These findings suggest that EV_APRIL, EV_CXCL13, and EV_VEGF-A may be useful in identifying TNBC patients at risk of poor survival outcomes after NAC.

Rates of price disclosure associated with the surgical treatment of early-stage breast cancer oneyear after implementation of federal regulations.

Mastectomy, breast reconstruction (BR) and breast conserving therapy (BCT) are core components of the treatment paradigm for early-stage disease but are differentially associated with significant financial burdens. Given recent price transparency regulations, we sought to characterize rates of disclosure for breast cancer-related surgery, including mastectomy, BCT, and BR (oncoplastic reconstruction, implant, pedicled flap and free flap) and identify associated factors. For this cross-sectional analysis, cost reports were obtained from the Turquoise Health price transparency platform for all U.S. hospitals meeting national accreditation standards for breast cancer care. The Healthcare Cost Report Information System was used to collect facility-specific data. Addresses were geocoded to identify hospital referral and census regions while data from CMS was also used to identify the geographic practice cost index. We leveraged a Poisson regression model and relevant Medicare billing codes to analyze factors associated with price disclosure and the availability of an OOP price estimator. Of 447 identified hospitals, 221 (49.4%) disclosed prices for mastectomy and 188 42.1%) disclosed prices for both mastectomy and some form of reconstruction including oncoplastic reduction (n = 184, 97.9%), implants (n = 187, 99.5%), pedicled flaps (n = 89, 47.3%), and free flaps (n = 81, 43.1%). Non-profit status and increased market competition were associated with price nondisclosure. 121 hospitals (27.1%) had an out-of-pocket price estimator that included at least one breast surgery. Most eligible hospitals did not disclose prices for breast cancer surgery. Distinct hospital characteristics were associated with price disclosure. Breast cancer patients face persistent difficulty in accessing costs.

Microwave imaging for monitoring breast cancer treatment: A pilot study.

Microwave imaging has been proposed for medical applications, creating maps related to water content of tissues. Breast imaging has emerged as a key application because the signals can be coupled directly into the breast and experience limited attenuation in fatty tissues. While the literature contains reports of tumor detection with microwave approaches, there is limited exploration of treatmentmonitoring. This study aims to detect treatment-related changes in breast tissue with a low-resolution microwavescanner. Microwave scans of 15 patients undergoing treatment for early-stage breast cancer are collected at up to 4 time points: after surgery (baseline), 6 weeks after accelerated partial breast radiation, as well as 1 and 2 years post-treatment. Both the treated and untreated breast are scanned at each time point. The microwave scanner consists of planar transmit and receive arrays and uses signals from 0.1 to 10 GHz. The average microwave frequency properties (permittivity) are calculated for each scan to enable quantitative comparison. Baseline and 6-week results are analyzed with a two-way ANOVA withblocking. Consistent properties are observed for the untreated breast over time, similar to a previous study. Comparison of the scans of the treated and untreated breast suggests increased properties related to treatment, particularly at baseline and 6-weeks following radiotherapy. Analysis of the average properties of the scans with ANOVA indicates statistically significant differences ( ) in the treated and untreated breast at these timepoints. Microwave imaging has the potential to track treatment-related changes in breasttissues.

Explaining risks and benefits of loco-regional treatments to patients.

Treatment for early-stage breast cancer is complex, requiring multidisciplinary care with a multitude of treatment options available for each patient. Coupled with the rising importance of shared decision-making, patient-physician conversations are progressively more complicated. These conversations require frank disclosure of risks and benefits of the different treatment modalities in a way that is individualized for each patient and simple to understand. In most patients, breast conserving therapy with radiation should be presented as the gold-standard local treatment given similar long-term and improved quality of life outcomes. De-escalation is currently at the forefront of research in loco-regional treatments, and further investigations are required to best determine the optimal patient populations for reduced sentinel lymph node sampling, omission of sentinel lymph node biopsy altogether and omission of radiation treatment. For future trials, better endpoints need to be established considering patient-centered outcomes as well as recurrence.

Comparison between conventional and oncoplastic breast surgeries regarding resection margins and local recurrences in breast cancer: Retrospective study

Background Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women and the second-leading cause of cancer-related fatalities globally. Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is the primary surgical treatment for early-stage breast cancer, with oncoplastic BCS techniques expanding its possibilities. BCS offers a higher quality of life compared to mastectomy. However, it has two absolute contraindications: the inability to produce negative margins without deforming the breast and inflammatory breast cancer. Oncoplastic displacement and replacement BCS allow resections of up to 50% of breast volume without creating deformity. Positive surgical margins often require a second procedure, which can increase pain, complications, and medical expenses. Patient and methods This retrospective cohort study analyzed 310 patients with primary invasive breast cancer or DCIS who underwent conventional or oncoplastic breast cancer surgery. Most patients underwent lateral and therapeutic reduction mammoplasties. Other techniques included LD flap, TDAP flap, mini-LD muscle flap, ICAP flap, grisotti flap, LICAP flap, and modified round block technique. Oncoplastic techniques were tailored based on breast cup size, tumor size, tumor location, and patient preference. Wide local excision of the tumor with free margins was confirmed through intraoperative frozen sections. Result The mean weight of the specimen was 55.89 gm in the conventional group and 101.55 gm in the oncoplastic group. The mean operative time was 65.9 min in the conventional group, while the oncoplastic group had 72.58 min Complications included seroma, hematoma, wound infection, wound dehiscence, lymphedema, and partial nipple necrosis. The aesthetic outcome was excellent, with 132 patients satisfied with their results in the oncoplastic group compared to 90 in the conventional group. Conclusion Oncoplastic breast surgeries are safe, feasible and became the standard of care in breast cancer. Oncoplastic breast surgeries are of choice in cases of multifocal cancer. People who performed oncoplastic breast surgeries had wider free margins, much more aesthetic outcome, better psychological status, less redo surgery, less late deformities, more time consuming, more wound complications improved with frequent dressing, and did not causea delay in the adjuvant therapy, more requirement for contralateral symmetrizing surgery.

Impact of Radiotherapy Volumes on Late-Term Cosmetic Outcomes and Quality of Life in Patients With Unifocal and Multifocal/Multicentric Breast Cancer After Breast-Conserving Surgery.

Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) followed by radiotherapy (RT) is the standard treatment for early-stage breast cancer. The use of an additional RT dose (boost) to the tumour bed improves local control but may worsen quality of life (QOL) and cosmetic results. Multifocal/multicentric tumours (MMTs) pose a challenge as they require larger boost volumes. This study investigated the impact of RT volumes on late-term cosmetic outcomes and QOL in patients with unifocal and MMTs who underwent adjuvant RT after BCS. Retrospective data of 367 patients who underwent BCS between 2012 and 2014 were reviewed. A cohort of 121 patients with at least six months of completed RT were prospectively included in the study. Cosmetic results were evaluated using a modified scoring system, and QOL was assessed using The European Cancer Treatment and Organization Committee tools. The results showed that the inclusion of regional lymphatics in the RT treatment field significantly affected QOL, particularly in terms of role functioning and social functioning. Higher boost volume ratios were associated with increased pain-related symptoms. However, the presence of MMTs did not significantly affect cosmetic outcomes compared to unifocal tumours. The size of the boost and inclusion of regional lymphatics in RT significantly impact QOL in patients undergoing BCS. Tumour foci number does not affect cosmetic outcomes. These findings emphasize the need for careful consideration of RT volumes to minimize long-term adverse effects on QOL. Future prospective studies should evaluate early side effects and baseline QOL scores to provide a comprehensive assessment.