Treatment Of Common Bile Duct Stones Research Articles

Revised Clinical Practice Guideline of Korean Pancreatobiliary Association for Common Bile Duct Stones: Endoscopic Management of Common Bile Duct Stones

For the optimal treatment of common bile duct (CBD) stones, several facts should be considered before or during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Prophylactic antibiotics is necessary for the patients with high risk of post ERCP cholangitis and cessation of anticoagulant should be considered for prevention of complications associated with post ERCP bleeding. Furthermore, endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation can be replaced with endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with bleeding tendency such as chronic kidney disease, liver cirrhosis, thrombocytopenia etc. Prophylactic pancreatic duct stent can be helpful in reducing post ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) but caution is required as excessive attempts for selective cannulation into pancreatic duct for stent insertion can cause PEP. If gallbladder stone is present and treatment for CBD stones has been completed, prophylactic cholecystectomy should be performed selectively after consideration of patient’s condition.

Risk factors for biliary tract events during elective cholecystectomy waiting time after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for choledocholithiasis.

Endoscopic lithotripsy and elective cholecystectomy, followed by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, are the first-line treatments for patients with common bile duct (CBD) stones (CBDS) and gallstones. However, this approach entails acute cholecystitis and recurrent cholangitis risk while patients await surgery. We aimed to identify acute cholecystitis and cholangitis risk factors during the waiting time for elective cholecystectomy. This study comprised 151 patients with CBDS combined with gallstones who underwent cholecystectomy within 90 days of the first endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographyat two tertiary care centers between January 2019 and October 2021. The incidence of biliary tract events (acute cholecystitis, acute cholangitis, or any complications requiring unplanned cholangiopancreatography) was 28% (43 cases). In univariate and multivariate analyses, plastic stent placement as a bridge to surgery for the first treatment of CBDS was an independent risk factor for biliary tract events during the waiting time for surgery (odds ratio 4.25, p = 0.002). A subgroup analysis among those with plastic stent placement revealed a CBD diameter of ≤ 10 mm as an independent risk factor for acute cholecystitis (odds ratio 4.32; p = 0.027); a CBD diameter ≥ 11 mm was an independent risk factor for acute cholangitis and unplanned re-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (odds ratio 5.66; p = 0.01). Plastic stent placement for CBDS before elective cholecystectomy increases the risk of acute cholecystitis or acute cholangitis during the waiting time for elective cholecystectomy.

Clinical Evaluation of Primary Suturing of Normal-Diameter Common Bile Ducts After Microincision of Cystic Duct Confluence for Stone Removal.

In patients with gallstones complicated by common bile duct (CBD) stones, both normal and dilated common bile ducts have been reported. The goal of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of primary suturing after microincision of the cystic duct confluence in treating these patients. Between July 2018 and December 2021, 104 patients were admitted to the Department of General Surgery at Guannan County People's Hospital with gallstone complications, and their records were reviewed retrospectively. The patients were divided into 2 groups: normal CBD group (n=70, CBD diameter: 6.0 to 8.0mm) and dilated CBD group (n=34, CBD diameter: >8.0mm). In these 104 patients, there were 75 cases of CBD stones with acute cholangitis, 12 cases of CBD stones without cholangitis, and 17 cases of mild biliary pancreatitis with CBD stones (including 2 cases of biliary pancreatitis with cholangitis). Among all patients, there were 37 cases with jaundice, 67 cases without jaundice, and 5 cases of emergency surgery. All patients underwent microincision of the cystic duct confluence followed by primary suturing. Both groups were compared on a variety of general and perioperative indicators. All patients underwent laparoscopy combined with choledochoscopy; there were no cases of biliary tract injury or conversion to laparotomy. There was no statistically significant difference in operation duration ( P =0.286), blood loss ( P =0.06), length of stay ( P =0.821), and time to drainage tube removal ( P =0.096) between the 2 groups. Microincision of the cystic duct confluence, followed by a primary suture, is a safe and effective treatment for CBD stones in patients with a normal CBD diameter, as determined by preoperative imaging.

Changes in the Management of Common Bile Duct Stones: 1980 to Date.

To compare the results of treating patients with common bile duct (CBD) stones by endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES), surgical exploration, or a combination of ES and surgical CBD exploration (the rendezvous technique). A narrative review of the literature. Before 1990, 17 cohort studies indicated that ES cleared CBD stones in 92.0% of patients, with a mortality rate of 1.5%. Surgery removed CBD stones in 90.2% of patients, with a 2.1% mortality rate. A single randomized controlled trial in 1987 showed that ES removed CBD stones in 91% of 55 patients, with a 3.6% mortality rate and a 27% complication rate, whereas surgical CBD exploration removed CBD stones in 92%, with a 1.8% mortality rate and a 22% complication rate. Since 1991, 26 randomized controlled trials have shown that laparoscopic-ES rendezvous is as effective as ES alone and laparoscopic surgery alone but is associated with fewer complications, a reduced need for additional procedures, and a shorter hospital stay. A laparoscopic-ES rendezvous appears to be the optimal approach to the treatment of CBD stones in younger and fit patients. The choice between ES alone and laparoscopic-ES rendezvous in older or high-risk patients remains uncertain.

Curative surgical treatment of common bile duct stones: Retrospective cohort study.

In the event of symptomatic common bile duct (CBD) stones with dilated CBD, one possible curative treatment option is stone extraction through choledocotomy associated with cholecystectomy. Endoscopic treatment is only reserved for residual stones at 6weeks. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results from laparoscopic curative surgical treatment of CBD stones with dilated CBD. This is a retrospective single-centered cohort study. All consecutive patients admitted for laparoscopic cholecystectomy with evidence of CBD stones with dilated CBD from January 2010 to December 2020 at our center were included. Success was defined by CBD clearance at 6weeks. Need for additional procedures, such as endoscopic sphincterotomy, immediate, and end-of-procedure morbi-mortality as well as factors associated with procedure failure, were also studied. A total of 246 patients who received curative treatment were included in the study. The success rate for the curative treatment was 93.1% (229 patients). Immediate postoperative morbidity was 24.4% with a 5.3% reintervention rate. Immediate and 6-week postoperative mortality rates were zero and 0.4%, respectively. The mean length of stay was 11.3days. Factors associated with procedure failure appeared to be the occurrence of an early postoperative complication and the need for readmission during the period between surgery and drain removal. This study indicates that laparoscopic curative surgical treatment for symptomatic CBD stones may be performed with acceptable results without routine need for additional procedures.

Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Transhepatic Cholangioscopic Lithotripsy for the Treatment of Common Bile Duct Stones and Analysis of Risk Factors for Recurrence.

As a minimally invasive treatment for common bile duct (CBD) stones, ultrasound-guided percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopic lithotripsy (PTCSL) is gaining attention and recognition from the medical community. A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with CBD stones treated in our hospital from January 2016 to April 2022. Patients were divided into three groups: 77 treated with PTCSL, 93 with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), and 103 with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE). Their clinical data, perioperative indicators, and complications were analyzed comparatively. Then, risk factors for the post-PTCSL recurrence of CBD stones were analyzed by logistic regressions. Finally, the receiver operating characteristic curve was drawn. All perioperative indicators of the PTCSL group were better than the LCBDE group (P < 0.001). The incidences of cholangitis, hemobilia, and incisional infection after surgery were lower in the PTCSL group than in the LCBDE group (P < 0.05). Pancreatitis, reflux esophagitis, and papillary stenosis occurred less frequently in the PTCSL group than in the ERCP group (P < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis indicated that gallstones and family history were independent risk factors. The AUC for recurrent CBD stones predicted by multi-indicators was 0.895 (95% CI 0.792-0.999, P < 0.001) with a sensitivity of 96.7% and specificity of 68.8%. Ultrasound-guided PTCSL is a safe and effective treatment for CBD stones. Patients recovered quickly with fewer postoperative complications. It can be a first-line treatment for CBD stones. Gallstones and family history are independent risk factors for recurrent CBD stones, which provide a reference for clinicians in identifying the high-risk population needing close follow-up.

ThTP1.1 Follow-Up of Young Patients Undergoing ERCP for Common Bile Duct Stones: Moving Algorithm Towards Surgery

Abstract Background Historically, the default treatment for common bile duct (CBD) stones in our institution has been endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). We aimed to assess the clinical outcomes following ERCP performed for CBD stones in patients aged 35 years old and younger, who may have been suitable for single-stage cholecystectomy with CBD exploration instead. Methods A database of all patients undergoing ERCP from May 2015 to May 2022 in a tertiary institution was prospectively maintained. We identified patients aged 35 and under who received ERCP for CBD stones, and reviewed data on their demographics and clinical outcomes from electronic clinical records. Results A total of 4079 ERCPs were carried out with a post-ERCP pancreatitis rate of 4.3%. 124 patients aged 35 and under (mean age 29±4 years, 84.7% female) were selected for further analysis. They had a post-ERCP pancreatitis rate of 12.1%. 100 patients (80.6%) proceeded to definitive surgery, with a median waiting time of 76 days. Of these, 38.0% experienced an unplanned admission resulting in emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy; a proportion required repeat ERCP and imaging. Consequently, these patients accumulated a total hospital stay of 13±8 days. Conclusions A higher rate of pancreatitis was seen in younger patients and a delay to definitive treatment is described, resulting in unplanned admissions, re-interventions and extra imaging with the associated increased cost. Single-stage cholecystectomy with CBD exploration would reduce complications, unplanned readmissions and cost. It is now our choice of treatment for CBD stones in this group of patients.

Five-Year Experience with Transcystic Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration.

Background: Common bile duct (CBD) stones associated with cholecystitis can be treated by single-stage CBD exploration at the time of cholecystectomy or a two-stage approach with endoscopic stone extraction before or after cholecystectomy. The ideal management remains a matter of debate. The aim of this study is to analyze our outcomes with transcystic laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE). Material and Methods: A retrospective review of patients who underwent transcystic LCBDE between 2015 and 2019 was performed. Results: A total of 106 patients underwent transcystic LCBDE over 5 years. We performed 1192 laparoscopic cholecystectomies with cholangiograms from March 2015 to December 2019. Fifteen patients had a preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for CBD stones seen on magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography that during laparoscopic cholecystectomy with intraoperative cholangiogram (IOC), there were stones and/or sludge found in the CBD, which required clearance through a transcystic approach. Of the 91 patients who did not have a preoperative ERCP, clearance of the CBD was successful through a transcystic approach in 78 patients (86%). In the 13 patients that intraoperative clearance was not achieved (n = 13, 14%), a postoperative ERCP was performed. A total of 28 patients underwent either pre- or postoperative ERCP (n = 28, 26%). Choledochotomy was not performed in any of the patients. The mean operative time was 127 minutes (127 ± 48). The mean hospital length of stay (LOS) was 4 days (3.9 ± 2.8) with a median LOS of 3 days. Complications observed include wound infection (n = 2, 2%), pancreatitis after ERCP (n = 1, 1%), pneumonia (n = 1, 1%), and right hepatic duct injury (n = 1, 1%). Conclusion: Transcystic LCBDE is an effective and safe option for treatment of CBD stones. While a transcystic approach does not guarantee clearance of the CBD, it avoids the morbidity associated with a choledochotomy and can often prevent patients from having to undergo an additional procedure.

Bile Microbiome in Patients with Recurrent Common Bile Duct Stones and Correlation with the Duodenal Microbiome.

Background: Common bile duct (CBD) stone recurrence is a common late adverse event after CBD stone treatment. In this preliminary study, we compared the bile fluid and duodenum microbial profiles of patients with or without recurrent CBD stones to identify risk factors associated with recurrence. Methods: Bile fluid samples of 47 consecutive patients who underwent ERCP for biliary diseases were subjected to microbiome analysis. Nineteen patients were stone-recurrent (SR), and 28 patients were non-stone-recurrent (NSR). Paired samples (duodenum biopsy tissue and bile fluid samples) from five SR patients were used to compare microbiome compositions in the biliary system and duodenum. In addition, we compared the microbiome compositions of these duodenal tissue samples with those 12 controls (gastric ulcer patients without recurrent CBD stones). Results: Enterococcaceae_unclassified and enterococcus were more abundant in bile fluid in the SR group than in the NSR group (p = 0.002 and p = 0.003, respectively). A comparison of the microbiome compositions of duodenum tissue and bile fluid samples of the five recurrent CBD stone patients revealed proteobacteria compositions were almost identical from the phylum to genus level. In these five patients, alpha and beta diversities were no different in bile fluid and duodenal tissues. Furthermore, a comparison of the microbiome compositions of duodenal mucosa in patients with recurrent CBD stone patients (n = 5) and controls (n = 12) revealed significant differences between microbiome compositions. Conclusions: Enterococcus seems to contribute to CBD stone development. Furthermore, our results indicate that retrograde migration of the duodenal microbiome may contribute to bile microbiome alterations. We recommend that more research be conducted to confirm this hypothesis.

Evaluation of therapeutic efficacy, safety and economy of ERCP and LTCBDE in the treatment of common bile duct stones.

Objectives: This study further compared the endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration (LTCBDE) approaches in the treatment of common bile duct stones (CBDS) from the perspective of efficacy, safety and economy. Methods: The therapeutic efficacy and safety of ERCP and LTCBDE approaches were retrospectively compared. Cost-effectiveness analysis of clinical economics was performed to analyze and evaluate the two approaches. Results: There was no significant difference in the success rate of surgery and bile stone residue between ERCP and LTCBDE group. The incidence of postoperative complications in ERCP group was significantly higher than that in the LTCBDE group; while the incidence of pancreatitis in the ERCP group was significantly higher than that in the LTCBDE group. There was no significant difference in biliary infection, bile leakage and sepsis between ERCP and LTCBDE groups. In terms of cost, the costs of surgery and nursing were significantly lower, the costs of treatment and sanitary materials were significantly higher in the ERCP group than that in the LTCBDE group. There was no significant difference in the costs of medical examination, laboratory test, medicine cost and total cost between ERCP group and LTCBDE group. The total length of hospital stay, length of hospital stay before surgery and duration of surgery in the ERCP group were significantly lower than that in the LTCBDE group; there was no significant difference in length of hospital stay after surgery between the ERCP and LTCBDE group. The cost-effectiveness ratio of ERCP group was 34171.25, and the cost-effectiveness of LTCBDE group was 34524.25. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of the two groups was 51415. Conclusion: ERCP and LTCBDE approaches had similar therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of CBDS. The safety of LTCBDE approach is superior to that of ERCP approach for the treatment of CBDS. ERCP approach is more economical in the treatment of CBDS than LTCBDE approach.

Comparison of Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration with Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography for Common Bile Duct Stones After Cholecystectomy.

Background: Few studies have focused on the treatment of common bile duct (CBD) stones after cholecystectomy, for which optimal treatment options remain unclear. Aims: To compare the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for CBD stone treatment after cholecystectomy. Materials and Methods: A total of 201 patients were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study, of whom 134 with ≤3 stones and a maximum stone diameter of <15 mm were classified as subgroup 1, and 67 with >3 stones or a maximum stone diameter of ≥15 mm were classified as subgroup 2. Perioperative characteristics were also analyzed. Results: ERCP subgroup 1 exhibited a shorter operative time (P < .001), postoperative hospital stay (P < .001), and lower incidence of bile leakage (P = .034) than LCBDE subgroup 1. ERCP subgroup 2 exhibited a shorter operative time (P < .001) and shorter postoperative hospital stay (P < .001) than LCBDE subgroup 2. However, LCBDE subgroup 2 exhibited a greater rate of complete stone removal (P = .044) and a lower incidence of acute pancreatitis (P = .037) than ERCP subgroup 2. Conclusions: For treatment of CBD stones after cholecystectomy, ERCP was superior in cases involving ≤3 stones and a maximum stone diameter of <15 mm. Among those with >3 stones or maximum stone diameter of ≥15 mm, LCBDE demonstrated certain advantages.

Diagnosis and treatment standardizations on percutaneous transhepatic papillary balloon dilation for common bile duct stones

Common bile duct (CBD) stone is a prevalent disease. As a novel treatment for CBD stone in China, percutaneous transhepatic papillary balloon dilation (PTPBD) has shown some advantages compared with other modalities. However, many components of the procedure remains unclear, including indications, contraindications, patient preparation, bile duct puncture, papillary dilation, imaging interpretation, and complication management.In order to standardize the clinic practice of PTPBD, Chinese College of Interventionalists organized a committee, including interventional radiologists, digestive physicians and general surgeons, and commissioned this criterion.

Safety, quality and efficiency of intra-operative imaging for treatment decisions in patients with suspected choledocholithiasis without pre-operative magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography

Cholecystectomy is the accepted treatment for patients with symptomatic gallstones. In this study, we evaluate a simplified strategy for managing suspected synchronous choledocholithiasis by focussing on intra-operative imaging as the primary decision-making tool to target common bile duct (CBD) stone treatment. All elective and emergency patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for gallstones with any markers of synchronous choledocholithiasis were included. Patients unfit for surgery or who had pre-operative proof of choledocholithiasis were excluded. Intra-operative imaging was used for evaluation of the CBD. CBD stone treatment was with bile duct exploration (LCBDE) or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (LC + ERCP). Outcomes were safety, effectiveness and efficiency. 506 patients were included. 371 (73%) had laparoscopic ultrasound (LUS), 80 (16%) had on-table cholangiography (OTC) and 55 (11%) had both. 164 (32.4%) were found to have CBD stones. There was no increase in length of surgery for LC + LUS compared with average time for LC only in our unit (p = 0.17). 332 patients (65.6%) had clear ducts. Imaging was indeterminate in 10 (2%) patients. Overall morbidity was 10.5%. There was no mortality. 142 (86.6%) patients with stones on intra-operative imaging proceeded to LCBDE. 22 (13.4%) patients had ERCP. Sensitivity and specificity of intra-operative imaging were 93.3 and 99.1%, respectively. Success rate of LCBDE was 95.8%. Effectiveness was 97.8%. Eliminating pre-operative bile duct imaging in favour of intra-operative imaging is safe and effective. When combined with intra-operative stone treatment, this method becomes a true 'single-stage' approach to managing suspected choledocholithiasis.

Predictive factors affecting percutaneous drainage duration in the percutaneous treatment of common bile duct stones.

The duration of percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) is a critical factor that determines the duration of treatment. This study aimed to evaluate factors affecting the PTBD duration in patients who underwent percutaneous treatment of common bile duct (CBD) stones. This study analyzed data of 169 patients who underwent percutaneous treatment of CBD stones from June 2009 to June 2019. Demographic data, characteristics of stone, procedure-related factors, and laboratory findings before the insertion of PTBD tubes were retrospectively evaluated. To assess the effect of confounding factors on the PTBD duration, multivariate linear regression analysis was applied, incorporating significant predictive factors identified in the univariate regression analysis. In the univariate regression analysis, the predictive factor that showed high correlation with the PTBD duration was the initial total bilirubin level (coefficient = 0.68, P < .001) followed by the short diameter of the largest stone (coefficient = 0.19, P = .056), and previous endoscopic sphincterotomy (coefficient = -2.50, P = .086). The multivariate linear regression analysis showed that the initial total bilirubin level (coefficient = 0.50, P < .001) and short diameter of the largest stone (coefficient = 0.16, P = .025) were significantly related to the PTBD duration. The total bilirubin level before PTBD tube insertion and the short diameter of the largest CBD stone were predictive factors for the PTBD duration in patients who underwent percutaneous CBD stone removal. Careful assessment of these factors might help in predicting the treatment period, thereby improving the quality of patient care.

Balloon-Assisted Stone Extraction (BASE): An Innovative Method for Lithotripsy during Laparoscopic CBD Exploration

Background: Balloon-assisted stone extraction (BASE) can be applied to remove the common bile duct (CBD) stones during laparoscopic CBD exploration (LCBDE). Aim: This study aimed to analyze the efficacy of BASE. Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients with CBD stone who underwent LCBDE using BASE at our center from 2001 to 2017, was conducted. The outcomes of BASE and potential factor for failure of this technique were also evaluated. Results: A total of 163 patients underwent LCBDE using BASE for CBD stone were enrolled. Success rate of BASE was 88.3% (144/163) and 19 (11.7%) patients with failed BASE underwent Basket for lithotripsy additionally. The reason for aborting BASE were stone impaction (n=6), small stone (n=4), migration into IHD (n=3), and others (n=6). The overall success rate of stone clearance was 97.5% (159/163). The mean CBD diameter was 15.8 mm (range 7-34 mm), and the largest stone size was 13.8 mm (range 3-36 mm). 22 patients had undergone gastrectomy prior to LCBDE. The overall complication rate was 4.9% (8/163), including bile leakage in 2 patients (1.2%), bleeding in 2 patients (1.2%) and pancreatitis in 4 patients (2.4%). There was no procedure related complication. Conclusions: BASE for CBD stone is safe and effective techniques for the treatment of CBD stones.

Appraisal of Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Explorations Using Balloon-Assisted Stone Extraction Method: Seventeen Years Experiences.

Background: Balloon-assisted stone extraction (BASE) can be applied to remove the common bile duct (CBD) stones during laparoscopic CBD exploration (LCBDE). This study aimed to analyze the efficacy of BASE. Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients with CBD stone who underwent LCBDE using BASE from 2001 to 2017 was conducted. The outcomes of BASE and potential factor for failure of technique were also evaluated. Results: A total of 163 patients underwent LCBDE using BASE were enrolled. Success rate of BASE was 88.3% (144/163) and 19 (11.7%) patients with failed BASE underwent basket for lithotripsy additionally. The reason for aborting BASE were stone impaction (n = 6), small stone (n = 4), migration into intrahepatic duct (IHD) (n = 3), and others (n = 6). The overall success rate of stone clearance was 98.2% (160/163). The mean CBD diameter was 15.8 mm (range 7-34 mm), and the largest stone size was 13.8 mm (range 3-36 mm). The overall rate of complication related with procedure was 4.9% (8/163), including bile leakage in 2 patients (1.2%), bleeding in 2 patients (1.2%), and pancreatitis in 4 patients (2.4%). There was no procedure-related mortality. Conclusions: BASE for CBD stone is safe and effective technique for the treatment of CBD stones.

Laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration (LTCBDE): a safer method to treat common bile duct stones than laparoscopic choledochotomy.

We read the article published in the Spanish Journal of Gastroenterology and its accompanying editorial about the laparoscopic treatment of both cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis in a single stage procedure. We would like to make some comments. Common bile duct (CBD) stones can lead to serious complications such as cholangitis and pancreatitis. So far, there is no standard surgical treatment for choledocholithiasis. Although, there are some ways to deal with CBD stones. Each method has its own advantages and disadvantages. In the era of advancements in minimally invasive technology, the treatment of CBD stones still remains controversial with regard to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) or laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE). Preoperative ERCP followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is frequently performed.

Useful method of Balloon-assisted stone extraction in laparoscopic CBD exploration

Introduction: Balloon-assisted stone extraction (BASE) can be applied to remove the common bile duct (CBD) stones during laparoscopic CBD exploration (LCBDE). This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and complications of BASE for CBD stones. Method: A total of 167 patients with CBD stones undergo LCBDE using BASE. The efficacy and complications of this technique were evaluated. Factor for failure of this technique also evaluated. Result: Of the 167 patients, 161 underwent LCBDE using BASE successfully. Remaining 6 patients were applied Basket for lithotripsy additionally and there was no failure of CBD stone removal in 6 patients. Also, there was no procedure related complication. The risk for Basket application was large stone (>2cm) and CBD stricture. Conclusion: BASE during LCBDE is safe and effective techniques for the treatment of CBD stones with <2cm size without CBD stricture.

Gallbladder function predicts subsequent biliary complications in patients with common bile duct stones after endoscopic treatment?

sBackgroundIn patients with common bile duct stones (CBDS) and intact gallbladder, further management for the gallbladder after the CBDS clearance is still controversial. The relationship between gallbladder motility and the biliary complications were seldom discussed. Our study is to predict the subsequent biliary complications by gallbladder function test using fatty meal sonography (FMS) in patients with CBDS who had been treated by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).MethodsPatients with an intact gallbladder and CBDS after endoscopic clearance of bile duct were enrolled. Patients received a fatty meal sonography after liver function returned to normal. The fasting volume, residual volume, and gallbladder ejection fraction (GBEF) in FMS were measured. Relationships of patients’ characteristics, gallbladder function and recurrent biliary complication were analyzed.ResultsFrom 2011 to 2014, 118 patients were enrolled; 86 patients had calculus gallbladders, and 32 patients had acalculous gallbladders. After a mean follow- up of 33 months, 23 patients had recurrent biliary complications. Among 86 patients with calculus gallbladder, 15 patients had spontaneous clearance of gallbladder stones; 14 patients received cholecystectomy due to acute cholecystitis or recurrent colic pain with smooth postoperative courses. In the follow up period, six patients died of non-biliary causes. The GBEF is significant reduced in most patients with a calculus gallbladder in spite of stone color. Calculus gallbladder, alcohol drinking and more than one sessions of initial endoscopic treatment were found to be the risk factors of recurrent biliary complication.ConclusionsGallbladder motility function was poorer in patients with a calculus gallbladder, but it cannot predict the recurrent biliary complication. Since spontaneous clearance of gallbladder stone may occur, wait and see policy of gallbladder management after endoscopic treatment of CBDS is appropriate, but regular follow- up in those patients with risk factors for recurrence is necessary.

Can Trainees Safely Perform Endoscopic Treatments for Common Bile Duct Stones? A Single-center Retrospective Study.

Objective There are no reports on whether or not trainees can safely carry out endoscopic procedures for the removal of common bile duct (CBD) stones. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic treatments for CBD stones by trainees. Methods Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was performed in 1,016 consecutive patients at our institution during the 6-year study period. The endoscopically treated patients with CBD stones were included in this study. Physicians who had experienced ≥300 ERCP procedures were defined as experts, while those who had experienced <300 procedures were defined as trainees. The trainees were replaced by an expert when they could not achieve the established criteria. Patients were divided into the following three groups to retrospectively examine the patients' backgrounds, details of endoscopic treatments, and intra-/post-operative complications: Group A, completed by trainees under supervision of an expert; B, treated by an expert who switched in for a trainee in the middle of the procedure; and C, completed by an expert. Results A total of 325 patients with CBD stones underwent endoscopic treatments. The number included in Groups A, B, and C was 176, 102, and 47, respectively. The bile duct catheter insertion successes rates for Groups A, B, and C were 99.0%, 97.1%, and 100% (p=0.09), and the complete stone removal rates were 94.2%, 94.8%, and 100%, respectively (p=0.07), showing no significant difference among the three groups. Furthermore, the frequency of intra-/post-operative complications was not significantly different among the three groups (p=0.48, p=0.12, respectively). Conclusion This study showed that trainees could safely perform endoscopic procedures in accordance with our facility's criteria during ERCP.