Abstract Objective Danhong injection (DHI) is commonly used in China to treat chronic stable angina (CSA), demonstrating significant clinical efficacy and safety. The present study aimed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of DHI combined with standard treatment (ST) compared with ST alone in patients with CSA. Methods A Markov model with a 3-month cycle and a 1-year time horizon was used to assess the cost-effectiveness of DHI + ST for CSA. Health outcomes were measured as quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and societal perspective costs were collected in China. Cost-effectiveness was evaluated using the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Sensitivity analysis was performed to test the robustness of results to parameter uncertainty. Results Analysis demonstrated DHI + ST provided 0.8190 QALYs at an average cost of $3644.24, while ST yielded 0.7884 QALYs costing $2739.54 over 1 year. The incremental analysis indicated DHI + ST dominance, with an ICER of $29,588.91 per QALY gained compared with ST. One-way sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of base case findings, and probabilistic sensitivity analysis suggested a 61.66% probability of DHI + ST being cost-effective over ST at a $37,663.26 per QALY threshold. Conclusion From a societal perspective in China, DHI + ST appears cost-effective for the treatment of CSA compared with ST alone. These findings support recommending DHI as a clinically valuable and cost-effective option in CSA treatment guidelines.
Read full abstract