Treatment Of Axillary Hyperhidrosis Research Articles

Negative pressure assisted rubbing suction technique for the treatment of axillary osmidrosis based on minimally invasive principle

BackgroundAxillary Osmidrosis is highly prevalent and occurr in adolescents, bilateral onset, its pathogenesis is related to abnormal secretion function of apocrine glands, with a significant genetic predisposition, the patient's bilateral armpit area can smell a spicy pungent odor, although it does not affect the health, but it is inconvenient to life, socialize. Patients are often accompanied by low self-esteem and urgently require treatment, and most of them have the requirement of minimally invasive treatment and minimal scarring. MethodIn this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of minimally invasive treatment of axillary osmidrosis with refined negative pressure-assisted rubbing suction technique. From August 2022 to August 2023, 50 patients (28 females and 22 males) with axillary osmidrosis were treated with refined negative pressure-assisted rubbing suction technique. HE staining of the tissue rubbed out of six of these patients showed a large amount of apocrine gland. ResultsIn the subjective evaluation of 50 (100 sides) patients, 66 sides (66 %) were very satisfied with the results of the treatment, 30 sides (30 %) were satisfied, and 4 sides (4 %) were dissatisfied. Clinical efficacy evaluation showed that 74 sides (74 %) of patients rated the results as cured, 18 sides (18 %) as significantly effective, 4 sides (4 %) as effective, and 4 sides (4 %) as ineffective. No serious surgical complications occurred except for the occurrence of Subcutaneous hydrops and hematoma on 6 sides. ConclusionsRefined negative pressure-assisted rubbing suction technique is an easy and effective method for minimally invasive treatment of axillary hyperhidrosis and deserves clinical promotion.

[Translated article] Topical Anticholinergics in the Management of Focal Hyperhidrosis in Adults and Children. A Narrative Review

Hyperhidrosis, or excessive sweating, is characterized by overactivity of the eccrine sweat glands, usually associated with dysfunction of the autonomic nervous system. Primary focal hyperhidrosis is the most common form and can affect the axillae, palms, soles, and/or face, often leading to significantly impaired quality of life and social functioning. Treatment is complex. Topical antiperspirants are normally recommended as the first-line treatment for mild hyperhidrosis. Multiple clinical trials and prospective studies support the efficacy and tolerability of oral and topical anticholinergics in the management of hyperhidrosis. Topical glycopyrronium, which has been investigated in at least 8 clinical trials enrolling more than 2000 patients, is probably the first-line pharmacological treatment for axillary hyperhidrosis in patients with moderate to severe disease poorly controlled with topical antiperspirants. Second-line treatments include botulinum toxin injections, microwave treatment, and oral anticholinergics. We review the use of topical anticholinergics in the management of focal hyperhidrosis in adults and children.

Botulinum toxin A versus microwave thermolysis for primary axillary hyperhidrosis: A randomized controlled trial

Botulinum toxin A (BTX) and microwave thermolysis (MWT) represent 2 treatment modalities for axillary hyperhidrosis with different procedural and efficacy profiles. To compare long-term outcomes following BTX vs MWT treatment of axillary hyperhidrosis. A prospective, randomized, within-patient, controlled trial, treating axillary hyperhidrosis with contralateral BTX and MWT. Objective sweat measurement and patient-reported outcome measures for sweat and odor were collected at baseline, 6-month and 1-year follow-up (6M/1YFU). Hair reduction and patient treatment preference was also assessed. Sweat reduction was significant (all P <.01) for both interventions throughout the study. Objectively, sweat reduction was equal at 1-year FU (ΔP =.4282), but greater for BTX than MWT at 6-month FU (ΔP =.0053). Subjective sweat assessment presented comparable efficacy (6MFU: ΔP =.4142, 1YFU: ΔP =.1025). Odor reduction was significant (all P <.01) following both interventions, whereas only sustaining for MWT (6MFU: ΔP =.6826, 1YFU: ΔP =.0098). Long-term, hair reduction was visible after MWT, but not BTX (ΔP ≤.0001), and MWT was preferred by the majority of patients (76%). The intrinsic challenges in efficacy assessment. This study exhibited BTX and MWT with similar sweat reduction, but distinguishable odor and hair reduction at 1-year FU. These findings support individualized treatment approaches for axillary hyperhidrosis based on patient-specific symptoms and preferences.

Patient satisfaction after miraDry® treatment for axillary hyperhidrosis. Results of an online patient survey after miraDry® treatment to reduce excessive axillary sweating.

Hyperhidrosis, with a prevalence of 1 to 2% of the population, primarily affects young people under 40 years of age. The individually perceived burden of odor and amount of sweat leads to a reduced quality of life. In recent years, conservative and surgical measures have been used to treat hyperhidrosis. The miraDry® method based on microwave technology is a non-invasive treatment that enables comparable results in terms of effectiveness while at the same time reducing the burden. In the Park-Klinik Birkenwerder, 282 hyperhidrosis patients were treated with the miraDry® method between 2017 and 2024. An online survey was conducted in May and June 2024. 220 patients were contacted, the results of 80 patients are available (response rate: 36.4%). Changes in the restrictions caused by increased sweating in various areas of life were asked before and after the treatment. In addition, the assessment of general quality of life before and after the treatment was compared. There is a significant reduction in restrictions and a corresponding increase in quality of life after treatment with miraDry®. Satisfaction with the method is high, which is reflected in a high recommendation rate of over 80%.

The Efficacy of Long-Pulsed, 1064-nm Nd:YAG Laser Versus Aluminum Chloride 20% Solution in the Treatment of Axillary Hyperhidrosis.

Introduction: Hyperhidrosis (HH) refers to uncontrollable excessive sweating that has a significant negative impact on the quality of life. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of the long-pulsed, 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser and aluminum chloride (ALCL3 ) 20% solution in axillary HH treatment. Methods: In this single-center, within-patient comparison clinical trial, 12 patients with axillary HH were treated monthly for 3 to 4 consecutive sessions with the long-pulsed, 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser system on one axilla, while the contralateral axilla was treated with ALCL3 20 % by the patient. Treatment response was evaluated by comparing the area of sweating at the end of each session and 6 months after treatment termination using the iodine starch test. Results: Both treatments led to the reduction of HH from baseline with the mean area of sweating reduced from 109.3±36.6 to 38.3±19.8 and from 92.5±31.6 to 35.6±17.1 in laser- and ALCL3-treated axilla respectively (Both P<0.001). In the 6-month follow-up, the area of sweating was 60.6±29.2 in the laser-treated armpit and 78.3±23.6 in the ALCL3-treated side, which were 45% and 14.4% lower compared to the baseline respectively. Adverse events were temporary, and none caused each of the treatments to be discontinued. Conclusion: The long-pulsed, 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser with hair reduction setting can stand as a potential therapeutic option for axillary HH since it is as effective as ALCL3. The therapeutic effect is superior in the long term for the laser; nevertheless, the beneficial effect of both treatments may lessen the following treatment cessation.

Reconstituted and frozen botulinum toxin A is as effective and safe as fresh for treating axillary hyperhidrosis: A retrospective study.

The use of reconstituted and frozen left-over botulinum toxin A, for treatment of patients with axillary hyperhidrosis seems to be common practice in healthcare. Thus, the objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of frozen and thawed versus fresh reconstituted abobotulinum toxin (Dysport®) and onabotulinum toxin (Botox®) in the treatment of axillary hyperhidrosis. A retrospective study was conducted analysing efficacy and data from pre- and 24 weeks post-treatment questionnaires together with medical records of individuals with moderate to severe axillary hyperhidrosis. The patients had received fresh prepared botulinum toxin A in their right axilla while frozen and thawed botulinum toxin A had been administered in their left axilla. Treatment was conducted at our Hyperhidrosis Clinic, Umeå University Hospital, Sweden 2019-2021. Pre- and post-treatment questionnaires from 106 patients were analysed. The patients were 18 to 55 years old, with a mean age of 30.7 ± 9.9 years. No significant differences in patient-reported variables, Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale and VAS 10-point scale, were found between the different preparations (frozen compared to fresh) for abobotulinum toxin and onabotulinum toxin, before treatment and at 6 months follow-up. Multivariable regression analysis resulted in no significant difference regarding side-effects between the preparations or brands of botulinum toxin. The findings of this study support our clinical experience that both abobotulinum toxin and onabotulinum toxin, reconstituted, frozen and thawed, seem to be as effective and safe as fresh prepared botulinum toxin when treating axillary hyperhidrosis. Our findings indicate that left-over preparations of abo- and onabotulinum toxins, stored and frozen for up to 6 months, is a cost-and time-effective way of handling botulinum toxin for treatment of axillary hyperhidrosis.

Anticolinérgicos tópicos en el manejo de la hiperhidrosis focal en adultos y niños. Una revisión narrativa

Hyperhidrosis, or excessive sweating, is characterized by overactivity of the eccrine sweat glands, usually associated with dysfunction of the autonomic nervous system. Primary focal hyperhidrosis is the most common form and can affect the axillae, palms, soles, and/or face, often leading to significantly impaired quality of life and social functioning. Treatment is complex. Topical antiperspirants are normally recommended as the first-line treatment for mild hyperhidrosis. Multiple clinical trials and prospective studies support the efficacy and tolerability of oral and topical anticholinergics in the management of hyperhidrosis. Topical glycopyrronium, which has been investigated in at least 8 clinical trials enrolling more than 2000 patients, is probably the first-line pharmacological treatment for axillary hyperhidrosis in patients with moderate to severe disease poorly controlled with topical antiperspirants. Second-line treatments include botulinum toxin injections, microwave treatment, and oral anticholinergics. We review the use of topical anticholinergics in the management of focal hyperhidrosis in adults and children.

The application of microwaves in axillary hyperhidrosis: Curative effect observation of a pathological examination over 1 year.

In Asia, axillary hyperhidrosis is a frequent problem for many people, and the consequent excessive sweating can seriously affect many aspects of daily life and even lead to mental disorders. Microwave therapy is a new, non-invasive treatment method for axillary hyperhidrosis, whose energy and long-term effectiveness still needs to be clinically validated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy, safety, histological changes, and psychological status of microwave devices in the treatment of axillary hyperhidrosis and osmidrosis. We conducted a prospective self-controlled study in a top-tier Chinese hospital. After a 5/5 energy treatment session, a skin biopsy was taken to observe histological changes both before and after treatment. An iodine starch test was used to determine the sweating range. We evaluated symptoms of improved efficacy using the Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale (HDSS) and assessed changes in life status with the DLQI. In the case of concurrent underarm odor, odor-5, VAS, and Young-Jin Park grading were used to assess odor relief. The effect of odor on psychology was assessed by using a psychological status symptom checklist (scl-90). The study period was 1 year. We observed 20 patients in this study. Of those, 90% met the primary treatment endpoint of a decrease in axillary hyperhidrosis symptomatology to below grade 2 on the HDSS score (p < 0.001). Furthermore, 75% of patients achieved a treatment endpoint of at least 50% reduction in VAS (p < 0.001). 70% of patients achieved a treatment endpoint of at least 50% reduction in odor-5 (p < 0.001). The iodine starch test showed that the region decreased 99% from the baseline to 12 months after follow-up had ended (p < 0.001). Eight patients volunteered to undergo histological examination; their average light density of immunohistochemistry decreased from 1.04 (0.4-2.11) to 0.07 (0.04-0.46; p < 0.05). The immunohistochemical positive number for sweat glands was initially 104 (59.75-132.5) but was 41.5 (29.75-62) after the procedure. None of the patients experienced any serious adverse reactions. The treatment demonstrated high effectiveness, safety, and short-lived adverse reactions.

Prosedur Pembedahan pada Hiperhidrosis Aksilaris dengan Teknik Tumesen &lt;i&gt;Liposuction-Curettage&lt;/i&gt;

Hyperhidrosis is an excessive sweat production due to autonomic nerve dysfunction that occurs in areas with higher concentration of eccrine gland such as palms, soles of the feet, and axilla. Management of hyperhidrosis includes pharmacological and nonpharmacological approach. Patients with severe focal hyperhidrosis should consider surgical treatment or botulinum toxin injection. Tumescent liposuction with curettage is one of surgical technique option for the treatment of axillary hyperhidrosis. Case: A 32-year-old woman with complaint of excessive sweating, especially in the axillary area. The patient had received oral therapy from a dermatologist prior, but there was no improvement, so the patient was advised to undergo a surgical procedure. In this patient the tumescent liposuction-curettage procedure was performed. Discussion: Treatment of hyperhidrosis with both topical and systemic agents generally provides only temporary suppression of hyperhidrosis. In severe, disturbing cases, the treatment of choice for axillary hyperhidrosis is the surgical procedure. Combination of liposuction-curettage surgical method using tumescent anesthesia is relatively simple and safe. Reduction of apocrine gland secretion after liposuction-curettage takes a relatively long time. This surgical technique has many advantages, such as relatively minimal injury dan short recovery period. Follow-up after this combined liposuction-curettage procedure should be performed subjectively and objectively at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperative.

Open-Label Cohort Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Application of Glycopyrronium Cloth, 2.4% for Palmar Hyperhidrosis.

Hyperhidrosis of the palms has a significant negative impact on quality of life. There is no FDA-approved treatment; however, clinicians often use glycopyrronium cloth off-label for this indication despite the lack of published guidance on optimal method of application for treatment of palms. To compare the safety and efficacy of 4 different methods of application of glycopyrronium cloth to give clinicians guidance when treating palmar hyperhidrosis. This study, conducted completely virtually using live interactive telemedicine, compared application times of 15 minutes, 30 minutes, and overnight without occlusion and 30 minutes under occlusion. The primary endpoint was a decrease in the mean of the Hand Severity Score (HHS) after 4 weeks of once-daily application. Safety data, including local skin reactions and other adverse events, were tabulated by cohort. Of the application times and methods tested, 30 minutes without occlusion produced the greatest decrease in the HHS with an acceptable safety profile. The most common adverse event was unilateral mydriasis, which presumably occurred from inadvertent introduction of study drug into the eye despite multiple warnings to the subjects to avoid eye contact. A few subjects had adverse events presumably due to systemic absorption of the drug similar to those seen in the pivotal trials for treatment of axillary hyperhidrosis. Glycopyrronium cloth can be used successfully to treat palmar hyperhidrosis. Occlusion for 30 minutes had the poorest response presumably due to the increased sweating causing dilution of the study drug. gov: NCT04906655 J Drugs Dermatol. 2022;21(5):488-494. doi:10.36849/JDD.6688.

Sofpironium bromide: an investigational agent for the treatment of axillary hyperhidrosis

ABSTRACT Introduction In recent years, increased knowledge about pathophysiology of primary hyperhidrosis has led to novel therapeutic advances. Topical and systemic anticholinergic agents have been proven beneficial in reducing sweat production in primary axillary hyperhidrosis (PAH), although their use is limited by the increased likelihood of systemic anticholinergic drug reactions, particularly regarding systemic agents. Areas covered This paper provides an overview of pharmaceutical characteristics, efficacy and safety data from phase II and III clinical trials on sofpironium bromide (SB), a topical anticholinergic agent that has been employed for the treatment of PAH and has already received its first approval in Japan for the treatment of PAH in the form of 5% gel formulation. Expert opinion The retrometabolic drug design of topical SB presents distinct advantages, by limiting systemic absorption and therefore development of anticholinergic adverse events. This along with the popularity of the non-greasy gel formulation is expected to increase compliance. However, this therapy still offers a temporary control of PAH, compared to sympathectomy or device-based treatments, such as microwave thermolysis. Hence, physicians should balance the effectiveness against adverse events of each therapeutic modality and use a personalized approach based on patient’s needs.

The efficacy and safety of a fractional microneedle radiofrequency device for the treatment of axillary hyperhidrosis: clinical prospective pilot study.

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a fractional microneedle radiofrequency device (FMRD) for the treatment of primary axillary hyperhidrosis (PAH). The FMRD adopted insulated microneedles, which could be located at a depth of up to 4.5mm and deliver a radiofrequency current in a fractional manner. Also, the device could automatically regulate the amount of the delivered energy. Sixteen Korean patients with PAH received two FMRD treatment sessions at a 3-week interval and were followed-up until week 15. The primary outcome was Patient Satisfaction Scale (PSS) score at each visit. Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale (HDSS) and Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) were also assessed. The area and amount of sweat produced were evaluated by specific tests. Mean PSS score significantly improved from 1.6 at week 3 to 2.5 at week 15 by 56%. More than a 50% improvement in sweating assessed by the PSS score was seen in 63% and 50% of patients at weeks 11 and 15, respectively. Mean HDSS score significantly decreased by week 3 and further decreased by week 7. Mean GAIS scores improved from the first follow-up visit at week 3 and improved again at week 7. The mean hyperhidrosis area assessed by starch-iodine test significantly decreased by 36% at week 15 compared with baseline. Mean transepidermal water loss level significantly decreased by 42% at week 15 compared with baseline. No patients experienced any serious adverse events. FMRD can be an effective and safe treatment modality for PAH.

Treatment of Axillary hyperhidrosis.

Axillary hyperhidrosis characterized by excessive sweating in the axillary regions is a frustrating chronic autonomic disorder leading to social embarrassment, impaired quality of life and usually associated with palmoplantar hyperhidrosis. Identifying the condition and its cause is central to the management. The aim of this article is to discuss treatment options for axillary hyperhidrosis. Comprehensive literature search using PubMed and Google Scholar was performed to review relevant published articles related to diagnosis and treatment of axillary hyperhidrosis. Treatment modalities for axillary hyperhydrosis vary from topical and systemic agents to injectables, newer devices and surgical measures. None except for physical measures using devices or surgery, which destroys the sweat glands to remove them, is possibly permanent and most are associated with attendant side effects. Several treatments including medical and surgical option are available for the treatment of axillary hyperhydrosis. Patient education is important component of its management. Individualized approach of management is necessary for optimal outcome of treatment.

A Study On A Treatment System For Hyperhidrosis And A Solution That Combines Focused Ultrasound And Ultrasound Imaging Technology

In this paper, for the treatment of axillary hyperhidrosis, we propose a driving algorithm for diagnosing the location / distribution / degree of sweat glands using ultrasound images and implementing a treatment device using high intensity focused ultrasound. Currently, treatment for axillary hyperhidrosis uses surgery to cut the skin itself or remove the sweat glands using an incision, but this has the disadvantage of scarring and long recovery time. To solve this, we propose a treatment device using high intensity focused ultrasound and a driving algorithm and a method for implementing a user interface environment.

CLINICAL EVALUATION OF HYPERHIDROSIS TREATMENT WITH MICROWAVE ABLATION

Introduction: Axillary hyperhidrosis is a condition that causes embarrassment and discomfort. The most common techniques used to inhibit axillary sweat glands are thoracic sympathectomy, liposuction curettage, and injection of botulinum toxin, all of which have immediate benets. However, in return, these can generate unsatisfactory effects after some time. Objective: This work aimed to evaluate the degree of satisfaction, benets, and possible adverse effects of the application of microwaves for the treatment of axillary hyperhidrosis. Methods: This is a retrospective study of patients with clinical diagnoses of primary axillary hyperhidrosis who underwent treatment with microwave ablation from 2015 to 2018. Medical records were analyzed for demographic data, degree of satisfaction (Likert scale), and adverse effects. Patients were classied according to their hyperhidrosis disease severity scale (HDSS) and clinical results of the treatment to the medical record. The correlation between the ndings was made considering the statistical validity of p = 0.05. Conclusion: The treatment of hyperhidrosis with ablation of sweat glands using microwaves (Miradry®) was safe and presented virtually no adverse effects. Although its effectiveness was below expected, the level of patient satisfaction was considered good.

A case series evaluating microwave-based therapy for axillary hyperhidrosis and bromhidrosis

Introduction Axillary hyperhidrosis and bromhidrosis have serious social, emotional, and professional consequences. There are several treatments of axillary hyperhidrosis. We present a case series evaluating the efficacy and safety of microwave device for axillary hyperhidrosis and bromhidrosis. Materials and methods Seven patients were included in our case series. Four patients had both hyperhidrosis and bromhidrosis. Three patients had only hyperhidrosis. To evaluate the degree of hyperhidrosis and degree bromhidrosis a self-reported Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale (HDSS) score and 4-point malodor grade were assessed. All patients underwent 1 or 2 microwave treatments. Patients underwent a survey on treatment outcomes and adverse effect conducted through telephone 12 months after their last procedure. Results Six of seven patients had a 2-point drop in HDSS score. The four patients with bromhidrosis had a 2-point drop on the self-reported malodor measurement 12 months post treatment. Minor adverse effects related to the therapy occurred. Conclusion This novel microwave-based treatment was effective for the treatment of axillary hyperhidrosis and bromhidrosis. Patient satisfaction with the procedure is high, and adverse events are typically transient and well tolerated.

Efficacy and tolerability of 20% aluminum sesquichlorohydrate vs 20% aluminum chloride for the treatment of axillary hyperhidrosis: A randomized controlled trial.

This study evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of topical aluminum sesquichlorohydrate (AS) when compared to aluminum chloride (AC) as a treatment for primary axillary hyperhidrosis (PAH). Twenty subjects were included in this randomized, controlled, split-side 8-week study. All participants applied 20% AS and 20% AC lotions in their axillae (one treatment per axilla) every night for 2 weeks; next, the application was reduced to three times a week for 4 weeks. The assessment was performed using the sweating intensity visual scale (SIVS), hyperhidrosis disease severity score (HDSS), patient satisfaction score, and the appearance of adverse effects on weeks 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8. Both AS as well as AC application showed positive results, significantly differing from the baseline, as assessed using SIVS, HDSS, and patient satisfaction score at every follow-up visit; however, no significant difference was observed between the AS and AC groups at any follow-up visit. The mean time of response was 1.14 weeks for both treatments. A side effect was observed in one subject (5%), who reported itching on the AC axilla. The therapeutic effects persisted even after reducing the frequency of application and lasted for at least 2 weeks after cessation of use. In conclusion, topical 20% AS demonstrated similar efficacy to topical 20% AC in the treatment of PAH, with a high safety profile.

Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Two Injection Techniques of IncobotulinumtoxinA for Axillary Hyperhidrosis.

Background: Botulinum toxin A (BoNT-A) is an effective treatment for axillary hyperhidrosis (AH) typically applied by multiple injection punctures. Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of two BoNT-A injection techniques for AH. Methods: Randomized, evaluator-blinded trial, in which each axilla of the same patient received 50 U of incobotulinumtoxin A (IncoA; Xeomin), one injected intradermally using multiple punctures, the other subcutaneously by radial approach. Follow-up visits occurred after 30, 120, 180, and 270 days. Outcomes included procedure duration and pain, gravimetry and starch-iodine tests and safety. Results: Twenty-four patients with severe hyperhidrosis were included; 67% were female and mean age was 34.7 years. Radial injection was faster applied than multiple punctures (P<0.001) but showed higher pain scores (P=0.001). Pre- and post-treatment gravimetric measures showed that IncoA led to a significant sweat reduction, by both techniques, with 95% of responders (≥50% reduction from baseline) after 30 days of treatment. Similarly, Minor's test showed an excellent response (90-100% reduction) by most patients regardless of the technique used, after 30 days and sustained for at least 270 days. At most time points, there were no significant differences between the two techniques; however, multiple punctures showed a higher reduction of gravimetric measures at days 30 and 180, and of Minor's test at day 270. Treatment was well tolerated. Conclusions: IncoA is an effective and safe treatment for AH irrespective to the technique used for injection. Our study suggests that multiple punctures injection may confer better outcomes at some time points. J Drugs Dermatol. 2020;19(7): doi:10.36849/JDD.2020.4989.

Efficacy and safety of topical sofpironium bromide gel for the treatment of axillary hyperhidrosis: A phase II, randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial

Primary axillary hyperhidrosis has limited noninvasive, effective, and well-tolerated treatment options. To evaluate the topical treatment of axillary hyperhidrosis with the novel anticholinergic sofpironium bromide. A phase II, multicenter, randomized, controlled, double-blinded study. Participants were randomized to 1 of 3 dosages or vehicle, with daily treatment for 42days. Coprimary end points were the percentage of participants exhibiting ≥1-point improvement in the Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Measure-Axillary (HDSM-Ax) score by logistic regression, and change in HDSM-Ax as a continuous measure by analysis of covariance. Pair-wise comparisons were 1-sided with α=0.10. At the end of therapy, 70%, 79%, 76%, and 54% of participants in the 5%, 10%, 15%, and vehicle groups exhibited ≥1-point improvement in HDSM-Ax (P<.05). Least-square mean (SE) changes in HDSM-Ax were -2.02 (0.14), -2.09 (0.14), 2.10 (0.14), and -1.30 (0.14) (all P≤.0001). Most treatment-related adverse events were mild or moderate. Not powered to detect changes in gravimetric sweat production. Sofpironium bromide gel produced meaningful reductions in hyperhidrosis severity and had an acceptable safety profile.

Treatment of Axillary Hyperhidrosis With Long-pulsed Nd:YAG Laser or IPL

Treatment of Axillary Hyperhidrosis With Long-pulsed Nd:YAG Laser or IPL