Treatment Of Advanced Melanoma Patients Research Articles

Nivolumab + relatlimab for the treatment of unresectable or metastatic melanoma

ABSTRACT Introduction Though melanoma is one of the less common skin malignancies, it accounts for the majority of deaths due to cutaneous cancers. The recent progress and drug approvals in targeted treatment and immunotherapy revolutionized the outcome of patients with metastatic disease, and now is also changing the landscape of adjuvant treatment in melanoma. Area covered A combination of anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 (nivolumab with ipilimumab) has demonstrated superior outcomes in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival with recent data confirming median survival exceeding six years. However, the use of this immunotherapy combination is limited in routine practice to approximately half of the patients due to high toxicity with the majority of patients at risk of severe adverse events. The current efforts are to determine how best to integrate combination immunotherapy in different clinical scenarios and limit these drugs’ toxicity. That is why novel strategies in immunotherapy are needed and one of the examples of such novelty are anti-LAG-3 antibodies (lymphocyte-activation gene 3). LAG-3 inhibitor (relatlimab) in combination with nivolumab significantly improved PFS as compared to anti-PD-1 monotherapy in patients with previously untreated metastatic or unresectable melanoma. We describe the current status of combination of nivolumab+ relatlimab in the treatment of advanced melanoma patients based on the available data coming from pivotal clinical trials. Expert opinion The most important question to be answered is what would be the place of this novel combination in the treatment planning strategy

Immunosuppressive capacity of circulating MDSC predicts response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in melanoma patients.

Although the treatment of advanced melanoma patients with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) significantly increased the therapeutic efficiency, many patients remain resistant to ICI that could be due to immunosuppression mediated by myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC). These cells are enriched and activated in melanoma patients and could be considered as therapeutic targets. Here we studied dynamic changes in immunosuppressive pattern and activity of circulating MDSC from melanoma patients treated with ICI. MDSC frequency, immunosuppressive markers and function were evaluated in freshly isolated peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from 29 melanoma patients receiving ICI. Blood samples were taken prior and during the treatment and analyzed by flow cytometry and bio-plex assay. MDSC frequency was significantly increased before the therapy and through three months of treatment in non-responders as compared to responders. Prior to the ICI therapy, MDSC from non-responders displayed high levels of immunosuppression measured by the inhibition of T cell proliferation assay, whereas MDSC from responding patients failed to inhibit T cells. Patients without visible metastasis were characterized by the absence of MDSC immunosuppressive activity during the ICI treatment. Moreover, non-responders showed significantly higher IL-6 and IL-8 concentrations before therapy and after the first ICI application as compared to responders. Our findings highlight the role of MDSC during melanoma progression and suggest that frequency and immunosuppressive activity of circulating MDSC before and during the ICI treatment of melanoma patients could be used as biomarkers of response to ICI therapy.

Sex-Based Differences in Treatment with Immune Checkpoint Inhibition and Targeted Therapy for Advanced Melanoma: A Nationwide Cohort Study.

Simple SummaryMelanoma is a malignant form of skin cancer. The overall survival of patients with advanced stages of disease were initially low. Fortunately, in recent years systemic treatment with immunotherapy has prolonged survival. We set out to answer the question whether men and women with advanced melanoma differ in prognostic factors, tumor-response to immunotherapy, and treatment-related adverse events. All patients in the Netherlands were registered between July 2013 and July 2018. We showed that although clinical and tumor characteristics differ, the safety profile of immunotherapy is comparable. Furthermore, overall, a 10% survival advantage for women was seen. Following immunotherapy there was no survival difference.Recent meta-analyses show conflicting data on sex-dependent benefit following systemic treatment for advanced melanoma patients. We examined the nationwide Dutch Melanoma Treatment Registry (July 2013–July 2018), assessing sex-dependent differences in advanced melanoma patients (stage IIIC/IV) with respect to clinical characteristics, mutational profiles, treatments initiated, grade 3–4 adverse events (AEs), treatment responses, and mortality. We included 3985 patients, 2363 men (59%) and showed that although men and women with advanced melanoma differ in clinical and tumor characteristics, the safety profile of immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) is comparable. The data suggest a 10% survival advantage for women, mainly seen in patients ≥60 years of age and patients with BRAF V600 mutant melanoma. Following ICI there was no survival difference.

Short-term treatment with multi-drug regimens combining BRAF/MEK-targeted therapy and immunotherapy results in durable responses in Braf-mutated melanoma

ABSTRACT Targeted and immunotherapy regimens have revolutionized the treatment of advanced melanoma patients. Despite this, only a subset of patients respond durably. Recently, combination strategies of BRAF/MEK inhibitors with immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy (α-CTLA-4 or α-PD-1) have increased the rate of durable responses. Based on evidence from our group and others, these therapies appear synergistic, but at the cost of significant toxicity. We know from other treatment paradigms (e.g. hematologic malignancies) that combination strategies with multi-drug regimens (>4 drugs) are associated with more durable disease control. To better understand the mechanism of these improved outcomes, and to identify and prioritize new strategies for testing, we studied several multi-drug regimens combining BRAF/MEK targeted therapy and immunotherapy combinations in a Braf-mutant murine melanoma model (BrafV600E/Pten−/− ). Short-term treatment with α-PD-1 and α-CTLA-4 monotherapies were relatively ineffective, while treatment with α-OX40 demonstrated some efficacy [17% of mice with no evidence of disease, (NED), at 60-days]. Outcomes were improved in the combined α-OX40/α-PD-1 group (42% NED). Short-term treatment with quadruplet therapy of immunotherapy doublets in combination with targeted therapy [dabrafenib and trametinib (DT)] was associated with excellent tumor control, with 100% of mice having NED after combined DT/α-CTLA-4/α-PD-1 or DT/α-OX40/α-PD-1. Notably, tumors from mice in these groups demonstrated a high proportion of effector memory T cells, and immunologic memory was maintained with tumor re-challenge. Together, these data provide important evidence regarding the potential utility of multi-drug therapy in treating advanced melanoma and suggest these models can be used to guide and prioritize combinatorial treatment strategies.

Baseline IFN-\u03b3 and IL-10 expression in PBMCs could predict response to PD-1 checkpoint inhibitors in advanced melanoma patients

Anti-PD-1 antibodies revolutionized the treatment of advanced melanoma patients. However, one out of three do not respond to this therapy, with an overall poor prognosis. Identification of predictive biomarkers in patients receiving immune-based therapies is necessary for minimizing risk of toxicity and optimizing patient benefit and is still an important unmet clinical need. Recently, many studies have evaluated peripheral blood markers as potential biomarkers, but none so far have been validated. We collected at baseline peripheral blood samples from 18 consecutive advanced melanoma patients treated with anti-PD-1 therapy. Main pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines were studied in PBMCs from baseline blood samples both evaluating mRNA expression by qRT-PCR and identifying PBMCs subpopulations by FACS analysis. We found that IFN-γ mRNA expression levels were significantly higher in responder patients compared to non-responder ones. Moreover, to better validate its role, we evaluated the IFN-γ/IL-10 ratio. This value was higher in responder patients. FACS analysis confirmed that CD4 + IFN-γ + PBMCs percentage was higher in responders. Our data suggest an interesting correlation between IFN-γ/IL-10 ratio and response to anti-PD-1 therapy in advanced melanoma patients, suggesting a new biomarker that could be easily incorporated in clinical practice.

All-trans Retinoic Acid Overcomes Acquired Resistance to PLX4032 via Inhibition of PIN1 in Melanoma Cells.

PLX4032 is commonly used in the treatment of advanced melanoma patients with BRAF-V600E mutation. The aim of this study was to elucidate the mechanisms by which up-regulation of PIN1 confers PLX4032 resistance in melanoma. The expression of PIN1 as well as the cytotoxic effects of combinatorial treatment of PLX4032 and all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) were investigated by immunoblotting, MTT assay, TUNEL assay, and soft agar assay. PIN1 expression is up-regulated in A375R cells, a PLX4032-resistant subline of melanoma cells generated from an A375 cell line, compared to parental A375 cells. Indeed, PIN1 positively regulated the expression of EGFR in A375R cells and led to activation of the RAF/MEK/ERK pathway. Importantly, PLX4032, when used in combination with ATRA, an inhibitor of PIN1, reduced EGFR expression, and consequently reduced cell viability and anchorage-independent growth of A375R cells compared to PLX4032 alone. Furthermore, co-treatment with ATRA and PLX4032 increased cleaved PARP and DNA fragmentation in A375R cells. PIN1 plays an important role in the development of PLX4032 resistance through up-regulation of EGFR expression.

Can We Accurately Predict Cost Effectiveness Without Access to Overall Survival Data? The Case Study of Nivolumab in Combination with Ipilimumab for the Treatment of Patients with Advanced Melanoma in England.

BackgroundNivolumab with ipilimumab (the Regimen) is the first immuno-oncology combination treatment to demonstrate long-term clinical benefit for advanced melanoma patients. We evaluated the cost effectiveness of the Regimen in this population, with and without the availability of overall survival (OS) data.MethodsA partitioned survival model and a Markov state-transition model were developed to estimate the lifetime costs and benefits of the Regimen versus ipilimumab. These models were built with and without the availability of OS data, as only progression-free survival data were available from the head-to-head, phase III trial against ipilimumab at the time of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) submission. Patient utilities and resource use data were sourced from trial data or the literature.ResultsIncremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) and absolute costs were similar between the models with and without OS data, but the model with OS data generated more than 1 additional quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) across both treatment arms. In both models, based on list prices, the Regimen was the most cost-effective treatment.ConclusionsThe analyses show that the Regimen is a cost-effective treatment for advanced melanoma patients in England, and methods to overcome the lack of OS can give reasonable estimates of QALYs gained and ICERs.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1007/s41669-018-0080-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The cost-effectiveness of nivolumab monotherapy for the treatment of advanced melanoma patients in England

BackgroundNivolumab was the first programmed death receptor 1 (PD-1) immune checkpoint inhibitor to demonstrate long-term survival benefit in a clinical trial setting for advanced melanoma patients.ObjectiveTo evaluate the cost effectiveness of nivolumab monotherapy for the treatment of advanced melanoma patients in England.MethodsA Markov state-transition model was developed to estimate the lifetime costs and benefits of nivolumab versus ipilimumab and dacarbazine for BRAF mutation-negative patients and versus ipilimumab, dabrafenib, and vemurafenib for BRAF mutation-positive patients. Covariate-adjusted parametric curves for time to progression, pre-progression survival, and post-progression survival were fitted based on patient-level data from two trials and long-term ipilimumab survival data. Indirect treatment comparisons between nivolumab, ipilimumab, and dacarbazine were informed by these covariate-adjusted parametric curves, controlling for differences in patient characteristics. Kaplan–Meier data from the literature were digitised and used to fit progression-free and overall survival curves for dabrafenib and vemurafenib. Patient utilities and resource use data were based on trial data or the literature. Patients are assumed to receive nivolumab until there is no further clinical benefit, assumed to be the first of progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or 2 years of treatment.ResultsNivolumab is the most cost-effective treatment option in BRAF mutation-negative and mutation-positive patients, with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of £24,483 and £17,362 per quality-adjusted life year, respectively. The model results are most sensitive to assumptions regarding treatment duration for nivolumab and the parameters of the fitted parametric survival curves.ConclusionsNivolumab is a cost-effective treatment for advanced melanoma patients in England.

Adjuvant therapy for resected stage III melanoma patients: high-dose interferon-alpha versus ipilimumab combined with kinases inhibitors.

High-dose interferon-alpha remains the first-line treatment in the adjuvant therapy of metastatic melanoma. More recently, high-dose pegylated interferon-alpha-2b has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. Actually, an adjuvant therapy alternative to high-dose interferon-alpha is represented by ipilimumab. Moreover, combination therapy of IFN-alpha or ipilimumab with tyrosine kinase inhibitors has been proved in patients with specific mutations. It is mandatory to understand what the best adjuvant treatment is for resected metastatic melanoma patients, particularly at stage III-N1, in terms of overall survival rather than recurrence-free survival. The ECOG 1609 clinical trial compared high-dose interferon-alpha and ipilimumab alone or combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the treatment of early metastatic melanoma. In the past, ECOG 1684, 1690 and 1694 trials showed improvement in recurrence-free survival more than overall survival for high-risk melanoma patients (stage IIB-III) treated with high-dose interferon-alpha, whereas more recently the EORTC 18991 trial reported successful therapeutic results in terms of recurrence-free survival rather than overall survival for stage III-N1 melanoma patients treated with high-dose pegylated interferon-alpha-2b. Toxicity was more acceptable within one year of treatment. Randomized trials have demonstrated that ipilimumab as second-line therapy is able to increase dose-dependent overall survival rates in advanced melanoma patients despite severe but reversible immune-related adverse events. Old tyrosine kinase inhibitors have been used in combination with interferon for the treatment of advanced melanoma patients with moderate benefits and increased toxicity, but new selective drugs seem to be more efficacious. Early metastatic melanoma patients (stage III-N1) should be the principal subset to be treated with the most suitable adjuvant therapy to achieve the best overall survival. New schedules have to be tested with high-dose interferon-alpha and ipilimumab alone or combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors while waiting for results from ECOG 1609.

Pembrolizumab for the treatment of melanoma: updates and perspectives.

Checkpoint inhibitors immunotherapy was a breakthrough in anti-tumor treatments. Anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibodies are now a standard of treatment for advanced melanoma patients, with a 3-year overall survival of over 50% and a low rate (<20%) of severe toxicities in the phase 3 studies. The aim of this review was to report the most important updates on anti-PD-1 drug pembrolizumab from ASCO (American Society of Clinical Oncology) and ESMO (European Society for Medical Oncology) 2017 Annual Meetings.

Highlights of the season 2016–2017 by the Spanish Melanoma Group (GEM)

In the last years there has been great progress in the treatment of advanced melanoma patients. This explosion of melanoma research has not declined, but rather has continued exponentially growing. In this review, the Spanish Group of Melanoma (GEM) compiles the highlights of melanoma treatment communicated or published between ASCO 2016 and AACR 2017. In this period, definitive data have been published about the possibility of achieving a long term survival with the use of single anti-PD-1 antibodies, as well as data on the description of clinical subgroups of patients that can also obtain a long term survival with the use of targeted drugs combining the oral BRAF and MEK inhibitors. The first immunotherapy combination including nivolumab, an anti-PD-1 antibody, plus ipilimumab, an anti-CTLA-4 antibody, has been approved, based on its demonstrated benefit in terms of overall survival versus ipilimumab alone.

EE4 - Cost Effectiveness of Nivolumab Monotherapy for the Treatment of Advanced Melanoma Patients in the United Kingdom

EE4 - Cost Effectiveness of Nivolumab Monotherapy for the Treatment of Advanced Melanoma Patients in the United Kingdom

PCN129 - Cost Effectiveness of Nivolumab in Combination with Ipilimumab for the Treatment of Advanced Melanoma Patients in England

PCN129 - Cost Effectiveness of Nivolumab in Combination with Ipilimumab for the Treatment of Advanced Melanoma Patients in England

Pembrolizumab expanded access program (EAP) in Spain: clinical activity.

e21029Background: The programmed death (PD-1) inhibitor pembrolizumab has recently been approved for treatment of advanced melanoma patients (p), based on a significant improvement in terms of surv...

Oncolytic Viral Therapy of Glioblastoma: Will this Soon become a Reality?

The first oncolytic virus therapy (talimogene laherparepvec or TVEC) in the U.S. was approved in October 2015 for the treatment of advanced melanoma patients [1]. Such novel and safer treatments are in active development but not yet available for brain tumors. Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common and aggressive form of brain cancer in adults with median survival of less than 15 months [2]. Current radiotherapy and chemotherapy regimens not only have failed to significantly benefit high-grade tumor patients, but also are associated with severe long-term side effects that worsen the quality of life. The development of more effective and tumor-selective treatment modalities is urgently needed. In the last decade, oncolytic viruses (OV) have emerged as a potential cancer therapeutic agent. Ovs are replication-competent viruses that selectively infect and replicate in cancer cells harboring a multitude of genetic alterations that allows virus propagation. The virus then either directly disrupts tumor cells further releasing infectious virions, or indirectly stimulates the host’s immune system to mount a sustainable anti-tumor response. Compared to conventional chemotherapy, advantages of OVs are two fold; 1) the incompetence of OVs to grow in normal cells due to intact anti-viral response and apoptotic pathways results in minimized sideeffects, and 2) OVs self-amplify and the infection increases within and between tumor cells with time [3,4]. The clinical testing of oncolytic viruses

Dendritic Cells Loaded With mRNA Encoding Full-length Tumor Antigens Prime CD4+ and CD8+ T Cells in Melanoma Patients

It is generally thought that dendritic cells (DCs) loaded with full-length tumor antigen could improve immunotherapy by stimulating broad T-cell responses and by allowing treatment irrespective of the patient's human leukocyte antigen (HLA) type. To investigate this, we determined the specificity of T cells from melanoma patients treated with DCs loaded with mRNA encoding a full-length tumor antigen fused to a signal peptide and an HLA class II sorting signal, allowing presentation in HLA class I and II. In delayed-type hypersensitive (DTH)-biopsies and blood, we found functional CD8(+) and CD4(+) T cells recognizing novel treatment-antigen-derived epitopes, presented by several HLA types. Additionally, we identified a CD8(+) response specific for the signal peptide incorporated to elicit presentation by HLA class II and a CD4(+) response specific for the fusion region of the signal peptide and one of the antigens. This demonstrates that the fusion proteins contain newly created immunogenic sequences and provides evidence that ex vivo-generated mRNA-modified DCs can induce effector CD8(+) and CD4(+) T cells from the naive T-cell repertoire of melanoma patients. Thus, this work provides definitive proof that DCs presenting the full antigenic spectrum of tumor antigens can induce T cells specific for novel epitopes and can be administered to patients irrespective of their HLA type.

Adjuvant Therapy for Resected Stage III Melanoma Patients: High-Dose Interferon-Alpha versus Ipilimumab Combined with Kinases Inhibitors

High-dose interferon-alpha remains the first-line treatment in the adjuvant therapy of metastatic melanoma. More recently, high-dose pegylated interferon-alpha-2b has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. Actually, an adjuvant therapy alternative to high-dose interferon-alpha is represented by ipilimumab. Moreover, combination therapy of IFN-alpha or ipilimumab with tyrosine kinase inhibitors has been proved in patients with specific mutations. It is mandatory to understand what the best adjuvant treatment is for resected metastatic melanoma patients, particularly at stage III-N1, in terms of overall survival rather than recurrence-free survival. The ECOG 1609 clinical trial compared high-dose interferon-alpha and ipilimumab alone or combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the treatment of early metastatic melanoma. In the past, ECOG 1684, 1690 and 1694 trials showed improvement in recurrence-free survival more than overall survival for high-risk melanoma patients (stage IIB-III) treated with high-dose interferon-alpha, whereas more recently the EORTC 18991 trial reported successful therapeutic results in terms of recurrence-free survival rather than overall survival for stage III-N1 melanoma patients treated with high-dose pegylated interferon-alpha-2b. Toxicity was more acceptable within one year of treatment. Randomized trials have demonstrated that ipilimumab as second-line therapy is able to increase dose-dependent overall survival rates in advanced melanoma patients despite severe but reversible immune-related adverse events. Old tyrosine kinase inhibitors have been used in combination with interferon for the treatment of advanced melanoma patients with moderate benefits and increased toxicity, but new selective drugs seem to be more efficacious. Early metastatic melanoma patients (stage III-N1) should be the principal subset to be treated with the most suitable adjuvant therapy to achieve the best overall survival. New schedules have to be tested with high-dose interferon-alpha and ipilimumab alone or combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors while waiting for results from ECOG 1609.