Treatment Of Advanced Gastric Cancer Research Articles

Gastric cancer secreted miR-214-3p inhibits the anti-angiogenesis effect of apatinib by suppressing ferroptosis in vascular endothelial cells.

Different from necrosis, apoptosis, autophagy and other forms of cell death, ferroptosis is a mechanism that catalyzes lipid peroxidation of polyunsaturated fatty acids under the action of iron divalent or lipoxygenase, leading to cell death. Apatinib is currently used in the third-line standard treatment of advanced gastric cancer, targeting the anti-angiogenesis pathway. However, Apatinib-mediated ferroptosis in vascular endothelial cells has not been reported yet. Tumor-secreted exosomes can be taken up into target cells to regulate tumor development, but the mechanism related to vascular endothelial cell ferroptosis has not yet been discovered. Here, we show that exosomes secreted by gastric cancer cells carry miR-214-3p into vascular endothelial cells and directly target zinc finger protein A20 to negatively regulate ACSL4, a key enzyme of lipid peroxidation during ferroptosis, thereby inhibiting ferroptosis in vascular endothelial cells and reducing the efficiency of Apatinib. In conclusion, inhibition of miR-214-3p can increase the sensitivity of vascular endothelial cells to Apatinib, thereby promoting the antiangiogenic effect of Apatinib, suggesting a potential combination therapy for advanced gastric cancer.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Plus Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Advanced Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) plus chemotherapy is effective in advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) cancer. This study aims to evaluate the clinical effect of first-line immunotherapy in combination with chemotherapy for advanced G/GEJ cancer. Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane databases were systematically searched from the inception of the databases to December 2021. Randomized trials comparing ICI plus chemotherapy with chemotherapy in first-line treatment for advanced G/GEJ cancer were included. The outcomes were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and adverse events (AEs). Analyses were performed in Stata 14.0 software. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42022300907. Results: Five trials were included for analysis, involving 2, 814 patients. ICI plus chemotherapy can significantly improve OS (hazards ratio [HR], 0.86; 95% CI 0.78-0.94; P = .002), PFS (HR, 0.79; 95% CI 0.63-0.99; P ＜ .001) and ORR (relative ratio [RR], 1.20; 95% CI 1.11-1.30; P < .001). In safety analyses, there were no significant differences in incidence of all AEs, treatment-related adverse event (TRAE), TRAE of grade 3 or higher, serious TRAE and TRAE leading to death between two arms (P > .05). Conclusions: ICI plus chemotherapy is more effective first-line treatment for advanced G/GEJ cancer in contrast to chemotherapy regrading to improving OS, PFS and ORR, without increasing TRAE risk. This study will redefine the role of ICI in combination with chemotherapy in the first-line setting for G/GEJ cancer, and provide reference for clinical treatment.

Effectiveness and Safety of Chinese Herbal Injections Combined with SOX Chemotherapy Regimens for Advanced Gastric Cancer: a Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.

Background: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated that combining Chinese herbal injections (CHIs) with oxaliplatin plus tegafur (SOX) chemotherapy regimens improves clinical effectiveness and reduces adverse reactions in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC). These RCTs highlight the potential applications of CHIs and their impact on AGC patient prognosis. However, there is insufficient comparative evidence on the clinical effectiveness and safety of different CHIs when combined with SOX. Therefore, we performed a network meta-analysis to rank the clinical effectiveness and safety of different CHIs when combined with SOX chemotherapy regimens. This study aimed to provide evidence for selecting appropriate CHIs in the treatment of patients with AGC. Methods: We searched eight databases from their inception until March 2023. Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking Curve (SUCRA) probability values were used to rank the treatment measures, and the Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA) software assessed the grading of evidence. Results: A total of 51 RCTs involving 3,703 AGC patients were identified. Huachansu injections + SOX demonstrated the highest clinical effectiveness (SUCRA: 78.17%), significantly reducing the incidence of leukopenia (93.35%), thrombocytopenia (80.19%), and nausea and vomiting (95.15%). Shenfu injections + SOX improved Karnofsky's Performance Status (75.59%) and showed a significant reduction in peripheral neurotoxicity incidence (88.26%). Aidi injections + SOX were most effective in reducing the incidence of liver function damage (75.16%). According to CINeMA, most confidence rating results were classified as "low". Conclusion: The combination of CHIs and SOX shows promising effects in the treatment of AGC compared to SOX alone. Huachansu and Shenfu injections offer the greatest overall advantage among the CHIs, while Aidi injections are optimal for reducing the incidence of liver damage. However, further rigorous RCTs with larger sample sizes and additional pharmacological studies are necessary to reinforce these findings.

ESM1 Interacts with c-Met to Promote Gastric Cancer Peritoneal Metastasis by Inducing Angiogenesis.

The peritoneum is the most common metastatic site of advanced gastric cancer and is associated with extremely poor prognosis. Endothelial-specific molecule 1 (ESM1) was found to be significantly associated with gastric cancer peritoneal metastasis (GCPM); however, the biological functions and molecular mechanisms of ESM1 in regulating GCPM remain unclear. Herein, we demonstrated that ESM1 expression was significantly upregulated in gastric cancer tissues and positively correlated with platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 (CD31) levels. Moreover, clinical validation, in in vitro and in vivo experiments, confirmed that ESM1 promoted gastric cancer angiogenesis, eventually promoting gastric cancer peritoneal metastasis. Mechanistically, ESM1 promoted tumor angiogenesis by binding to c-Met on the vascular endothelial cell membrane. In addition, our results confirmed that ESM1 upregulated VEGFA, HIF1α, and MMP9 expression and induced angiogenesis by activating the MAPK/ERK pathway. In conclusion, our findings identified the role of ESM1 in gastric cancer angiogenesis and GCPM, thus providing insights into the diagnosis and treatment of advanced gastric cancer.

Immunotherapy and combined treatment in gastric cancer

Gastric Carcinoma (GC) ranks as the fifth inducing cause for cancer incidence, and its the fourth inducing reason for cancer-related mortality. Traditional treatments, which involve a combination of chemotherapy and surgical resection, often yield unfavorable prognoses for gastric cancer patients, especially for those with advanced stages or metastases. Immunotherapy has recently emerged as the significant focus in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer, particularly for patients with MSI-H/dMMR. Medications targeting PD-1, such as nivolumab and Keytruda, have gained marketing approval in recent years. Additionally, some biomarkers like HER2, FGFR, and VEGF have shown positive efficacy in clinical research. However, resistance to immunotherapy remains a significant challenge, and the effectiveness of these pharmaceuticals often lasts only about a year for patients suffering advanced gastric cancer. Consequently, theres a need to explore new immune checkpoint inhibitors and discover novel combination therapy approaches. This review is aimed at introducing several latest immune checkpoint inhibitors currently in clinical phases or in pre-clinical stages, alongside innovative combination strategies for treating gastric cancer.

Macrophages enhance cisplatin resistance in gastric cancer through the transfer of circTEX2.

Cisplatin-based chemotherapy is often used in advanced gastric cancer (GC) treatment, yet resistance to cisplatin may lead to treatment failure. Mechanisms underlying cisplatin resistance remain unclear. Recent evidence highlighted the role of macrophages in cancer chemoresistance. Macrophage-derived exosomes were shown to facilitate intercellular communication. Here, we investigated the cisplatin resistance mechanism based on macrophage-derived exosomes in gastric cancer. Cell growth and apoptosis detection experiments revealed that M2-polarized macrophages increased the resistance of GC cells to cisplatin. qRT-PCR, RNAase R assay, actinomycin D assay and cell nucleo-cytoplasmic separation experiments confirmed the existence of circTEX2 in macrophage cytoplasm, with a higher expression level in M2 macrophages than that in M1 macrophages. Further experiments showed that circTEX2 acted as microRNA sponges for miR-145 and regulated the expression of ATP Binding Cassette Subfamily C Member 1 (ABCC1). Inhibition of the circTEX2/miR-145/ABCC1 axis blocked the cisplatin resistance of gastric cancer induced by M2 macrophages, as evidenced by invitro and invivo experiments. In conclusion, our research suggests that the exosomal transfer of M2 macrophage-derived circTEX2 enhances cisplatin resistance in gastric cancer through miR-145/ABCC1. Additionally, communication between macrophages and cancer cells via exosomes may be a promising therapeutic target for the treatment of cisplatin-resistant gastric cancer.

Convenient method to improve efficiency of lymph node examination after gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer

BackgroundThe D2 procedure has been accepted as the standard treatment for advanced gastric cancer (GC) in East Asia. Determination of the number of lymph nodes (LNs) after gastrectomy may influence the pathological stage assessment of lymph node metastasis, significantly influencing prognostic evaluations and formulation of chemotherapy regimens.MethodsBetween January 2020 and January 2022, the medical files of 312 patients with clinical stage T0-4aN0-3M0 gastric cancer were reviewed retrospectively, and the patients were assigned to the normal group (lymph nodes were examined roughly), manual group (lymph nodes were manually examined meticulously), and device group (lymph nodes were examined by device). The clinical and pathologic characteristics, number of lymph nodes harvested, and the time required for lymph node examination was compared.ResultsA total of 312 gastric cancer patients (mean age 65.8 ± 10.3 years, 85 females and 227 males) underwent gastrectomy with curative intent at our department. Sex, age, body mass index (BMI), tumor size, clinical TNM stage, and pathologic TNM stage in the three groups showed no statistically significant differences (P > 0.05). The mean number of harvested lymph nodes in the normal, manual, and device group was 24.2, 36.6 and 35.2, respectively, which showed significant differences (P < 0.0001). The mean number of positive lymph nodes in the normal, manual, and device group was 3.5, 3.9 and 3.9, respectively (P = 0.99). The mean time consumption in device group was 15 min while the time consumption in manual group was 52.3 min, which showed a significant difference (P < 0.0001).ConclusionThis improved lymph node examination method offers a simple approach that is worth promoting, and it can improve the number of harvested lymph nodes efficiently.

Alterations in Intratumoral Immune Response before and during Early-On Nivolumab Treatment for Unresectable Advanced or Recurrent Gastric Cancer

We investigated the tumor immune response in gastric cancer patients receiving third-line nivolumab monotherapy to identify immune-related biomarkers for better patient selection. Nineteen patients (10 males, median age 67 years) who received nivolumab as a third- or later-line therapy were enrolled. We analyzed the tumor immune response in durable clinical benefit (DCB) and non-DCB patients. Pre-treatment and early-on-treatment tumor transcriptomes were examined, and gene expression profiles, immunograms, and T cell receptor (TCR) repertoire were analyzed. DCB was observed in 15.8% of patients, with comparable secondary endpoints (ORR; objective response rate, OS; overall survival, PFS; progression-free survival) to previous trials. The immunograms of individual subjects displayed no significant changes before or early in the treatment, except for the regulatory T cell (Treg) score. Moreover, there were no consistent alterations observed among cases experiencing DCB. The intratumoral immune response was suppressed by previous treatments in most third- or later-line nivolumab recipients. TCR repertoire analysis revealed newly emerged clonotypes in early-on-treatment tumors, but clonal replacement did not impact efficacy. High T cell/Treg ratios and a low UV-radiation-response gene signature were linked to DCB and treatment response. This study emphasizes the tumor immune response’s importance in nivolumab efficacy for gastric cancer. High T cell/Treg ratios and specific gene expression signatures show promise as potential biomarkers for treatment response. The tumor-infiltrating immune response was compromised by prior treatments in third-line therapy, implying that, to enhance immunotherapeutic outcomes, commencing treatment at an earlier stage might be preferable. Larger cohort validation is crucial to optimize immune-checkpoint inhibitors in gastric cancer treatment.

Preoperative Frailty Assessed Comprehensively by a Questionnaire Predicts a Poor Survival Following Curative Resection of Gastric Cancer.

The concept of frailty has been attracting attention as a comprehensive indicator of the various effects of aging, but no conclusion has been reached on how to evaluate it. The present study investigated the adverse effect of preoperative frailty on short- and long-term outcomes in patients with gastric cancer using a questionnaire about frailty. One hundred and twenty-five patients with pathological stage (p Stage) I/II/III who underwent radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer at the Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka, Japan from April 2015 to December 2016 were enrolled in this study. The frailty index (FI) was calculated by dividing the total score of 50 questions consisting of 1 point per question by 50. The study used multiple logistic regression analysis with 5-year overall survival (OS) as the endpoint to create a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to determine the cut-off point for the FI. The short- and long-term outcomes of the frail and non-frail groups were then compared, and prognostic factors for OS were examined. Regarding the short-term outcomes, the postoperative complication rates did not differ significantly between the two groups. Regarding the 5-year OS rates of the patients with p Stages II/III, the outcomes in the frail group were significantly poorer than those in the non-frail group. In the multivariate analysis of OS, frailty was independently associated with unfavorable outcomes in patients with p Stages II/III gastric cancer. Frailty evaluation in this study may be useful in predicting long-term prognosis in patients undergoing surgical treatment for advanced gastric cancer.

194P Real-world outcomes of cadonilimab (PD-1/CTLA-4 bispecific antibody) plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment in advanced gastric (G) or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer with PD-L1 CPS≤5

194P Real-world outcomes of cadonilimab (PD-1/CTLA-4 bispecific antibody) plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment in advanced gastric (G) or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer with PD-L1 CPS≤5

Pembrolizumab as a first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer

Pembrolizumab as a first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer

Current and Emerging Role of Monoclonal Antibody-Based First-Line Treatment in Advanced Gastro-Esophageal and Gastric Cancer.

Gastric cancer is the fifth most common malignancy worldwide and one of the main causes of cancer-related death. While surgical treatment is the only curative option for early disease, many have inoperable or advanced disease at diagnosis. Treatment in this case would be a combination of chemotherapy and immunotherapy. Gastro-esophageal (GEJ) and gastric cancer (GC) genetic profiling with current molecular diagnostic techniques has significantly changed the therapeutic landscape in advanced cancers. The identification of key players in GEJ and GC survival and proliferation, such as human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1), has allowed for the individualization of advanced cancer treatment and significant improvement in overall survival and progression-free survival of patients. This review comprehensively examines the current and emerging role of monoclonal antibody-based first-line treatments in advanced GEJ and GC. We explore the impact of monoclonal antibodies targeting HER2, VEGF, PD-1/PD-L1, and Claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2) on the first-line treatment landscape by talking about key clinical trials. This review emphasizes the importance of biomarker testing for optimal treatment selection and provides practical recommendations based on ASCO guidelines.

Comparing effectiveness and safety of paclitaxel plus raltitrexed vs. paclitaxel alone in second-line palliative chemotherapy for metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma: A randomized phase II clinical trial.

Paclitaxel (P) is a standard second-line chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. This study compared the clinical outcome of a paclitaxel plus raltitrexed (RP) regimen as second-line treatment in metastatic gastric cancer (MGC) patients. An open, randomized, multi-center phase II clinical trial was conducted involving 148 patients who were randomly assigned and treated with RP [raltitrexed (3 mg/m2 on day 1) and paclitaxel (135 mg/m2 on day 1 every 3 weeks)] or P [paclitaxel (135 mg/m2 on day 1 every 3 weeks)] as 2nd-line chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints were the overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and safety. PFS had a tendency to be prolonged with RP compared to P (2.7 months vs. 1.7 months; P = 0.148). OS was also prolonged with RP compared to P (10.2 months vs. 6.1 months; P = 0.140). The ORR was equal in the RP and P groups (6.8% and 4.0%; P = 0.72). The disease control rate (DCR) in the RP and P groups was 56.2% and 36.0%, respectively. Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 36.2% (RP) and 28.2% (P) of patients. Frequent grade 3-4 toxicities for RP and P were neutropenia (11.0% and 4.0%), anemia (1.4% and 4.0%), and thrombocytopenia (1.4% and 5.3%), and all grades of peripheral neurotoxicity (12.3% vs. 17.3%). All grades of hepatic toxicity were demonstrated for the RP and P groups based on elevated aminotransferase levels (27.4% and 14.1%). Subgroup analysis shows if MGC was combined with ascites or peritoneal involvement, the OS of the RP regimen was longer (P = 0.05). Second-line palliative chemotherapy with RP was shown to prolong the PFS and OS, especially among patients with ascites or peritoneal involvement, which warrants confirmation using larger sample studies.

Meta-analysis of three randomized trials of capecitabine plus cisplatin (XP) versus S-1 plus cisplatin (SP) as first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer.

S-1 plus cisplatin (SP) and capecitabine plus cisplatin (XP) are standard first-line regimens for advanced gastric cancer (AGC) worldwide. We conducted a meta-analysis using individual participant data (IPD) to investigate which is more suitable. IPD from three randomized trials were collected. In these trials, patients with AGC were randomly allocated to SP (S-1 80-120mg for 21days plus cisplatin 60mg/m2 (q5w)) or XP (capecitabine 2000mg/m2 for 14days plus cisplatin 80mg/m2 (q3w)). In 211 eligible patients, median overall survival (OS) for SP versus XP was 13.5 and 11.7months (hazard ratio [HR], 0.787; p = 0.114), progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.2 and 5.1months (HR, 0.767; P = 0.076), and TTF was 5.1 and 4.0months (HR, 0.611; P = 0.001). The most common grade ≥ 3 adverse events with SP or XP were neutropenia (18% vs. 29%) and anorexia (16% vs.18%). Subgroup analysis demonstrated significant interaction between treatment effect and performance status > 1 (HR, 0.685; P = 0.036), measurable lesion (HR, 0.709; P = 0.049), primary upper third tumor (HR, 0.539; P = 0.040), and differentiated type (HR, 0.549; interaction, 0.236; P = 0.019). For the differentiated type, OS was significantly longer in the SP group (13.2months) than in the XP group (11.1months) (HR, 0.549; P = 0.019). For the undifferentiated type, OS was similar in the SP group (14.2months) and in the XP group (12.4months) (HR, 0.868; P = 0.476). SP and XP were both effective and well tolerated. SP might be suitable for the pathological differentiated subtype of AGC. The HERBIS-2, HERBIS-4A, and XParTS II trials were registered with UMIN-CTR as UMIN000006105, UMIN000006755, and UMIN000006045, respectively.

Clinical Study and Value of Combining Jianpi Xiaozheng Zisheng Tang with Renshen Dahuang Tang in the Treatment of Advanced Gastric Cancer

Clinical Study and Value of Combining Jianpi Xiaozheng Zisheng Tang with Renshen Dahuang Tang in the Treatment of Advanced Gastric Cancer

The risk of weekend biopsy: Impact of specimen source and fixation status on HER2 assessment in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer (The HER_WEEKEND study).

Accurate evaluation of human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2) expression is crucial for determining chemotherapy regimens in gastric cancer. However, formalin fixation status has been identified as an important factor affecting HER2 assessment reliability. This retrospective cohort study aimed to investigate the correlation between sample collection day (weekday vs. weekend) and source (biopsy vs. surgical specimens) in assessing HER2 expression in patients with unresectable advanced/recurrent gastric cancer. Data were collected from gastric cancer patients who received chemotherapy at a single public hospital in Japan from 2008 to 2021. The analysis included 177 patients (109 men, 68 women) with a median age of 68.0 (21-88) years, and the primary outcome was the HER2 positivity rate. The overall HER2 positivity rate was 18.1%, with higher rates on weekdays (20.0%) compared to weekends (12.8%). Biopsies had higher positivity rates on weekdays (23.9%) but lower rates on weekends (11.1%) than surgical specimens. Significant differences were observed in formalin fixation times between weekdays and weekends for both biopsies and surgical samples. The study findings suggest that longer formalin fixation times on weekends may lead to underestimating HER2 expression, particularly in biopsies. Therefore, it is crucial to be cautious of excessive formalin fixation when collecting samples, especially during weekend biopsies.

Expression of p53 as a biomarker in determining response to apatinib for advanced gastric cancer.

Apatinib has shown outstanding value in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer (AGC). However, no biomarkers are available to select AGC patients who will benefit from apatinib. The aim of the present study was to investigate the association between p53 and Ki67 expression of and the outcome in AGC patients treated with apatinib. From December 2015 to December 2020, 92 AGC patients were enrolled and was retrospectively evaluated. They were given apatinib at a daily dose of 500 or 250 mg every 4 weeks to monitor clinical efficacy and adverse events (AEs). Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis. Expression of p53 and Ki67 was detected by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and correlated with survival. Among 92 evaluable patients, the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 17.4% and 79.3%, respectively, and none of them achieved a CR, 16 achieved a PR (17.4%) (95% CI 9.8%-26.1%). Stable disease (SD) was observed in 57.6% of patients (95% CI 49.2%-69.9%) and PD in 21.7% of patients (95% CI 13.6%-31.3%). The median progression free survival (mPFS) was 122.7 ± 8.2 days, and the median overall survival (mOS) was 203.4 ± 11.9 days. P53 expression was observed in 35 patients (38.0%) and high expression of Ki67 was detected in 34 patients (37.0%). There was a statistically significant inverse relationship between p53 and Ki67 expression (P=0.014). Moreover, p53 was significantly correlated with the OS (P=0.018), but Ki67 had no significant influence on OS. Apatinib showed promising efficiency and was well tolerated as a second-line treatment for AGC patients. AGC patients with p53-negative were likely to benefit from apatinib treatment; however, the expression of Ki67 proteins has no significant impact on the outcome of AGC patients.

Long-term survival after multidisciplinary treatments for HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer with multiple liver and lung metastases

BackgroundTrastuzumab-based chemotherapy is a standard treatment regimen for human epithelial growth factor 2 (HER2)-positive gastric cancer. This is a case of a patient who has survived 12 years after being diagnosed with advanced gastric cancer with multiple liver and lung metastases.Case presentationA woman in her 70s underwent total gastrectomy, cholecystectomy, and left hepatic lobectomy for gastric cancer with liver metastasis. One month after the surgery, multiple liver metastases appeared. After two courses of S-1 + CDDP chemotherapy, the liver metastases disappeared, and new lung metastases occurred. Because the primary tumor was HER2 positive, S-1 + CDDP + trastuzumab chemotherapy was performed. After one course of chemotherapy, the blood test showed pancytopenia, and CDDP was discontinued. S-1 + trastuzumab chemotherapy was then initiated, and as a result, the lung metastases disappeared. The patient is alive without recurrence 12 years after the surgery.ConclusionsWe encountered a case of long-term survival after multidisciplinary treatments for HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer with multiple liver and lung metastases.

Randomised phase II trial of trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) plus ramucirumab (RAM) versus trifluridine/tipiracil for previously treated patients with advanced gastric or esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma (RETRIEVE study, WJOG15822G)

BackgroundTrifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) prolongs survival in the third- or later-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer (GC), esophagogastric junction (EGJ) adenocarcinoma, and colorectal cancer. While single-arm phase II trials showed promising outcomes of FTD/TPI plus ramucirumab (RAM) as third- or later-line treatments for advanced GC or EGJ cancer, there have been no clinical trials to directly compare FTD/TPI plus RAM with FTD/TPI monotherapy. Therefore, we have started a randomised phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FTD/TPI plus RAM compared with FTD/TPI monotherapy as third- or later-line treatments in patients with advanced GC and EGJ adenocarcinoma.MethodsThis RETREVE trial (WJOG15822G) is a prospective, open-label, randomised, multicentre phase II trial comparing FTD/TPI plus RAM versus FTD/TPI monotherapy in a third- or later-line setting. Eligibility criteria include age of > 20 years; performance status of 0 or 1; unresectable or recurrent gastric or EGJ adenocarcinoma; confirmed HER2 status; refractory or intolerant to fluoropyrimidine, taxane or irinotecan; refractory to RAM (not intolerant); and at least a measurable lesion per RECIST 1.1. FTD/TPI (35 mg/m2 twice daily, evening of day 1 to morning of day 6 and evening of day 8 to morning of day 13) was administered orally every 4 weeks, and RAM (8 mg/kg) was administered intravenously every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints are overall survival, objective response rate, disease control rate, and safety. The expected hazard ratio of PFS is set as 0.7, assuming 4-month PFS rate of 27% in FTD/TPI monotherapy and 40% in FTD/TPI plus RAM. The number of subjects was 110, with a one-sided alpha error of 0.10 and power of 0.70.DiscussionThis study will clarify the additional effect of RAM continuation beyond disease progression on FTD/TPI in the third- or later-line setting for patients with advanced GC or EGJ cancer.Trial registrationjRCTs041220120.

Claudin 18.2 Expression in Gastric Adenocarcinomas in a Large Turkish Cohort

Background: Claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2) is a tight junction protein expressed especially in gastric adenocarcinomas. The prognostic and clinicopathologic implications of CLDN18.2 expression is currently unknown. Zolbetuximab monoclonal antibody against CLDN18.2 is under investigation as a potential treatment for advanced gastric cancer (GC). We aimed to investigate the impact of CLDN18.2 expression in GC on prognosis and tumor features in a large Turkish cohort.&#x0D; Methods: Seven tissue microarrays (TMAs) containing 263 cases of GC were constructed. Assessment of CLDN18.2 expression was performed by immunohistochemistry, where it was scored as negative and positive.&#x0D; Results: 14.3% (37/258) of GCs were stained with anti-CLDN18.2 antibody. While 7.8% (20/258) of all cases were positive, 92.2% (238/258) were scored as negative. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of patient features such as age or sex, tumor grade, TNM stage, histologic subtype or overall survival.&#x0D; Conclusion: CLDN18.2 expression was not associated with patient prognosis in the Turkish cohort. However, as this molecule is a potential therapeutic target, information about the impact of CLDN18.2 expression will be important in managing patients, therefore more studies are needed to learn more on the outcomes of CLDN18.2 expression on clinicopathologic features in GC.