Treatment Of Rectal Cancer Research Articles

New opportunities and challenges of anal preservation strategies for rectal cancer in the era of immunotherapy

With the advancement of medical technology and concept, rectal cancer treatment methods continue to develop, further improving the efficacy of comprehensive treatment and quality of life for patients. Innovation in various anal preservation operations for low rectal cancer has continuously improved the rate of anal preservation, and the concept of the "watch and wait" strategy may become a new milestone in the treatment of rectal cancer. With the application of immunotherapy to all aspects of cancer treatment, it will certainly have a profound impact on the treatment of colorectal cancer, especially the anal preservation strategy. Combined with the new characteristics, advantages, and achievements of immunotherapy, more patients with rectal cancer can achieve the purpose of preserving the anus and organs through nonsurgical therapy, and obtain the same disease-free survival and overall survival while improving the quality of life. Currently, the study of sensitization immunotherapy for different types of bowel cancer is in the ascendancy, and the development of a better treatment plan is an urgent problem to be explored and solved.

Spray skin protectant versus standard moisturiser in the prevention of radiodermatitis in patients with anal canal and rectal cancer: A randomised clinical trial.

The evidence on products for the prevention of radiodermatitis is limited. The primary objective was to analyse the effectiveness of the spray skin protectant 'non-burning barrier film' in the prevention of radiodermatitis with moist desquamation in patients with the anal canal and rectal cancer followed in nursing consultations compared to a standardised moisturiser based on Calendula officinalis and Aloe barbadensis. Single-blind randomised clinical trial. The study was performed in a hospital in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, with 63 patients undergoing anal canal and rectal cancer treatment, randomised into one of the following two groups: an experimental group, which used a spray skin protectant and a control group, which used a moisturiser. Data were collected using an initial and subsequent evaluation form and were assessed using descriptive and inferential analyses. Participants who used the spray skin protectant had a lower chance of presenting radiodermatitis with moist desquamation and a longer time without this outcome when compared to the control group. The overall incidence of radiodermatitis was 100%, with 36.5% being severe. Furthermore, 17.5% of participants discontinued radiotherapy due to radiodermatitis. There were no differences between the groups regarding the severity of radiodermatitis and the number of patients who discontinued radiotherapy. The skin protectant was effective in preventing radiodermatitis with moist desquamation amongst patients with anal canal and rectal cancer.

Conjecture on the next development direction of colorectal cancer and its minimally invasive surgery

The surgical treatment of colorectal cancer will be more and more accurate and minimally invasive under the guidance of precision medicine. At the same time, it will derive and evolve non-surgical paths, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors and immune targeted therapy for microsatellite instability high/mismatch repair deficient colorectal cancer, and wait and watch path after neoadjuvant treatment for low advanced rectal cancer. Laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer will be gradually iterated by robots, which is the only way to intelligent surgery.

Success rate of fiducial marker placement for treatment of esophageal or rectal cancers: a prospective multicenter study (FIDECHO study) (with video)

Background and study aimsEndoscopy Ultra-Sound (EUS)-guided fiducial marker placement in patients with esophageal or rectal cancer who have been referred for radiation therapy lacks data regarding its feasibility and safety. The aim of this study was to assess the success rate of EUS-guided fiducial marker placement in these indications. Patients and methodsThis prospective multicenter study enrolled patients with rectal or esophageal tumor, who were treated between March 2017 and June 2021. The primary endpoint was the success of fiducial markers placement under EUS guidance utilizing the preloaded 22-gauge EchoTip Ultra Fiducial needle® (Cook Medical, Limerick, Ireland), defined by the ability to release fiducials at least at proximal and distal ends of the tumor. The secondary endpoints were the adverse events, length of procedure, and remaining fiducial markers throughout radiation therapy. ResultsA total of 33 patients were included in this study, with a mean age of 64.2 years ±11.3, and 66.7% of males. Twenty patients had rectal adenocarcinoma, and 13 had esophageal malignancies. The success rate of fiducial markers placement was 93.9%. Markers could only be released at the proximal end of the tumor in two cases. The average procedure time (±SD) was 12.5 min (±4.8). The number of fiducial markers placed for each patient was 3.8 (±0.5). No adverse event was reported. At the end of radiotherapy, markers were still visible on imaging in all patients. ConclusionThis prospective multicenter study highlights the safety and high success of the placement of fiducial markers under EUS, for rectal and esophageal tumors, without adverse event, and with a short procedure time. Fiducial markers remain in place over time during radiation therapy. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03057288

Identifying Complete Responders Following Chemotherapy-only Neoadjuvant Treatment for Rectal Cancer: Role of MRI.

Identifying Complete Responders Following Chemotherapy-only Neoadjuvant Treatment for Rectal Cancer: Role of MRI.

Feasibility of a tailored operative strategy from organ preservation to pelvic exenteration for cT4 rectal cancer depending on neoadjuvant response

PurposeImprovements in neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced cT4 rectal cancer have led to improved tumour response and thus a variety of suitable management strategies. The aim of this study was to report management and outcomes of patients with cT4 rectal cancer undergoing a spectrum of treatment strategies from organ preservation (OP) to pelvic exenteration (PE).MethodsPatients who underwent elective treatment for cT4 rectal cancer between 2016 and 2021 were included. All patients were treated with curative intent. Surgical management was adapted to tumour response. Kaplan–Meier curves were generated to compare 3-year overall survival (3y-OS), local recurrence (3y-LR) and distant metastases (3y-DM) between different strategies.ResultsAmong 152 patients included, 13 (8%) underwent OP, 71 (47%) TME and 68 (45%) APR/PE. The median follow-up was 31.3 months. Patients undergoing OP had a lower tumour pretreatment (p < 0.001). Compared to patients with TME, those with APR/PE had a higher rate of ypT4 (p = 0.001) with a lower R0 rate (p = 0.044). The 3y-OS and 3y-DM were 78% and 15.1%, respectively, without significant differences. The 3y-LR was 6.6%, and patients with OP had a significantly worse 3y-local regrowth compared to 3y-LR in patients with TME and APR/PE (30.2% vs. 5.4% vs. 2%, p = 0.008).ConclusioncT4 tumours may be suitable for the full spectrum of rectal cancer management from organ preservation to pelvic exenteration depending on tumour response to neoadjuvant therapy. However, careful attention is required in OP as local regrowth in up to 30% of cases reinforces the need for sustained active surveillance in Watch&Wait programmes.

Deciphering the Dilemma: Choosing the Optimal Total Neoadjuvant Treatment Strategy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

Rectal cancer management has evolved significantly, particularly with neoadjuvant treatment strategies. This narrative review examines the development and effectiveness of these therapies for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), highlighting the historical quest that led to current neoadjuvant alternatives. Initially, trials showed the benefits of adding radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy (CT) to surgery, reducing local recurrence (LR). The addition of oxaliplatin to chemoradiotherapy (CRT) further improved outcomes. TNT integrates chemotherapy and radiotherapy preoperatively to enhance adherence, timing, and systemic control. Key trials, including PRODIGE 23, CAO/ARO/AIO 12, OPRA, RAPIDO, and STELLAR, are analyzed to compare short-course and long-course RT with systemic chemotherapy. The heterogeneity and difficulty in comparing TNT trials due to different designs and outcomes are acknowledged, along with their promising long-term results. On the other hand, it briefly discusses the potential for non-operative management (NOM) in select patients, a strategy gaining traction due to favorable outcomes in specific trials. As a conclusion, this review underscores the complexity of rectal cancer treatment, emphasizing individualized approaches considering patient preferences and healthcare resources. It also highlights the importance of interpreting impressive positive or negative results with caution due to the variability in study designs and patient populations.

Sequence of Contact X-ray Brachytherapy (CXB) and External Beam Radiation (EBRT) in organ-preserving treatment for small rectal cancer

Background and purposeExternal Beam Radiotherapy (EBRT) followed by Contact X-ray Brachytherapy (CXB) and vice versa are viable alternatives to surgery for selected rectal cancer patients who have small tumours (≤3 cm). However, the optimal sequence of treatment needs to be established. We compared two approaches using Propensity Score (PS) matching and inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) analyses to investigate whether the sequence of treatment affected patient outcomes. Materials and methodsThis retrospective analysis (2008–2019) included patients with rectal adenocarcinoma (cT1-3,N0-1,M0, grade 1–2, size ≤ 3 cm) who received both EBRT and CXB, irrespective of treatment sequence. PS matching and IPTW were conducted to balance covariate standardised mean differences between groups. Oncological outcomes and rate of post-treatment rectal bleeding were assessed. ResultsFollowing PS matching and IPTW analyses from 251 eligible patients; 103 starting with EBRT (median follow-up: 37 [IQR:18–56] months) and 148 with CXB (median follow-up: 32 [IQR:16–54] months, a significant improvement in 3-year overall survival (77% vs 85%, p = 0.02, [HR:0.58 (95% CI:0.37–0.91)]) and a higher risk of post-treatment rectal bleeding (grade 1 (26%) and grade 2 (6%)) were found in patients who started with CXB (p = 0.08). No significant differences were observed in local regrowth (18% vs 12%, p = 0.47), distant relapse (10% vs 6%, p = 0.53), 3-year organ preservation rates (70% vs 75%, p = 0.20, [HR:0.66 (95% CI: 0.35–1.26)]), or disease-free survival (78% vs 82%, p = 0.17, [HR: 0.47 (95% CI: 0.16–1.38)]) ConclusionIn patients with rectal cancer (≤3 cm), commencing with CXB rather than EBRT, was associated with improved overall survival, but had a higher risk of G1/2 rectal bleeding. No statistically significant differences were observed in other oncological outcomes.

Total neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: a literature review

The problem of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) treatment has not lost its importance and relevance over the past decades, due to the steady increase in the incidence. For a long time, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) before total mesorectal excision (TME) and followed systemic chemotherapy was widely accepted as the standard therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer. Although local control is more than satisfactory using this approach, the same cannot be said of distant metastases, which rate reaches 30 % or more and is mainly the cause of death of this category of patients. One of the reasons for this lack of improvement may be the rate of patients who complete the planned adjuvant chemotherapy, which is approximately 50 %. The reasons for that may be postoperative complications, long-term recovery after extensive surgical procedures, etc. Total Neoadjuvant Therapy (TNT) is an emerging approach for the treatment of LARC aimed at improving distant metastasis. This review will outline the main steps in the evolution of LARC treatment and the formation of the stages of total neoadjuvant therapy.

Quantifying societal burden of radiation-induced small bowel toxicity in patients with rectal cancer.

Advancements in rectal cancer (RC) treatment not only led to an increase in lives saved but also improved quality of life (QoL). Notwithstanding these benefits, RC treatment comes at the price of gastrointestinal morbidity in many patients. Health economic modelling poses an opportunity to explore the societal burden of such side-effects. This study aims to quantify radiation-induced late small bowel (SB) toxicity in survivors of RC for Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy (3D-CRT), Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) and Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy - Image Guided Radiation Therapy (IMRT/IGRT). Materials and A model-based health economic evaluation was performed. The theoretical cohort consists of a case-mix of survivors of RC aged 25-99 years according to Belgian age-specific incidence rates. A societal perspective was adopted. The base case analysis was complemented with one-way deterministic analyses, deterministic scenario analyses and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (1,000 iterations). Results were presented as mean lifetime incremental cost (€) and utility (QALYs) per patient. The analyses showed that the use of innovative radiotherapy (RT) improves lifetime QoL in survivors of RC by 0.11 QALYs and 0.05 QALYs by preferring IMRT/IGRT and IMRT over 3D-CRT, respectively. The use of IMRT/IGRT and IMRT results in an incremental cost-saving of €3,820 and €1,863 per patient, solely by radiation-induced SB toxicity, compared to 3D-CRT. It is important to consider late toxicity effects in decisions regarding investments and reimbursement as our analysis highlighted the potential long-term cost-savings and improved QoL of novel RT techniques in patients with rectal cancer.

Incidence and risk factors for perineal hernia after robotic abdominoperineal resection: a single-center, retrospective cohort study.

Perineal hernia (PH) is a late complication of abdominoperineal resection (APR) that may compromise a patient's quality of life. The frequency and risk factors for PH after robotic APR adopting recent rectal cancer treatment strategies remain unclear. Patients who underwent robotic APR for rectal cancer between December 2011 and June 2022 were retrospectively examined. From July 2020, pelvic reinforcement procedures, such as robotic closure of the pelvic peritoneum and levator ani muscles, were performed as prophylactic procedures for PH whenever feasible. PH was diagnosed in patients with or without symptoms using computed tomography 1 year after surgery. We examined the frequency of PH, compared characteristics between patients with PH (PH+) and without PH (PH-), and identified risk factors for PH. We evaluated 142 patients, including 53 PH+ (37.3%) and 89 PH- (62.6%). PH+ had a significantly higher rate of preoperative chemoradiotherapy (26.4% versus 10.1%, p = 0.017) and a significantly lower rate of undergoing pelvic reinforcement procedures (1.9% versus 14.0%, p = 0.017). PH+ had a lower rate of lateral lymph node dissection (47.2% versus 61.8%, p = 0.115) and a shorter operative time (340min versus 394min, p = 0.110). According to multivariate analysis, the independent risk factors for PH were preoperative chemoradiotherapy, not undergoing lateral lymph node dissection, and not undergoing a pelvic reinforcement procedure. PH after robotic APR for rectal cancer is not a rare complication under the recent treatment strategies for rectal cancer, and performing prophylactic procedures for PH should be considered.

439 Predictors of Treatment Pathway Completion in Stage IV Rectal Cancer: A Nationwide Observational Study of 15,727 Patients

Abstract Aim Stage IV rectal cancer carries a 10% 5-year survival rate. Curative-intent management requires treatment of both the primary and metastatic disease. This study aimed to identify patterns in stage IV rectal cancer treatment pathway at population level across the UK, and to identify predictors of treatment pathway completion. Method Patient demographics and treatment data were extracted from the UK Colorectal Cancer Intelligence Hub’s CORECT-R repository, national chemotherapy (SACT), and radiotherapy (RTDS) datasets. Treatment pathway completion was defined as receipt of intervention to the primary tumour (radiotherapy and/or surgery) in addition to metastasis-directed therapy (surgery, radiotherapy, OR ablation), or the combination alongside chemotherapy. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of treatment completion. Results A total of 15,727 patients with stage IV rectal cancer diagnosed between 2010-19 were identified. Multivariable analyses showed that sex, age, number of cancer alliances (CAs) attended, ethnicity, and deprivation score were all statistically significant in predicting completion of treatment (p-values&amp;lt;0.02). The number of CAs attended was identified as having the strongest predictive effect of treatment completion (OR=3.9, CI: 3.5–4.3). Being male also increased the odds of completing treatment (OR=1.2, CI: 1.1-1.3), while increased deprivation reduced odds of completing treatment. Conclusions Across the UK, there is variation in Stage IV rectal cancer patients completing treatment for both their primary and metastatic disease. Further work is needed to determine whether differences in treatment pathways stem from variation in access to specialist services between alliances or whether they are due to differences in MDT decision making.

Risk factors and development of machine learning diagnostic models for lateral lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer: multicentre study.

The diagnostic criteria for lateral lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer have not been established. This research aimed to investigate the risk factors for lateral lymph node metastasis and develop machine learning models combining these risk factors to improve the diagnostic performance of standard imaging. This multicentre prospective study included patients who underwent lateral lymph node dissection without preoperative treatment for rectal cancer between 2017 and 2019 in 15 Japanese institutions. First, preoperative clinicopathological factors and magnetic resonance imaging findings were evaluated using multivariable analyses for their correlation with lateral lymph node metastasis. Next, machine learning diagnostic models for lateral lymph node metastasis were developed combining these risk factors. The models were tested in a training set and in an internal validation cohort and their diagnostic performance was tested using receiver operating characteristic curve analyses. Of 212 rectal cancers, 122 patients were selected, including 232 lateral pelvic sides, 30 sides of which had pathological lateral lymph node metastasis. Multivariable analysis revealed that poorly differentiated/mucinous adenocarcinoma, extramural vascular invasion, tumour deposit and a short-axis diameter of lateral lymph node ≥ 6.0 mm were independent risk factors for lateral lymph node metastasis. Patients were randomly divided into a training cohort (139 sides) and a test cohort (93 sides) and machine learning models were computed on the basis of a combination of significant features (including: histological type, extramural vascular invasion, tumour deposit, short- and long-axis diameter of lateral lymph node, body mass index, serum carcinoembryonic antigen level, cT, cN, cM, irregular border and mixed signal intensity). The top three models with the highest sensitivity in the training cohort were as follows: support vector machine (sensitivity, 1.000; specificity, 0.773), light gradient boosting machine (sensitivity, 0.950; specificity, 0.918) and ensemble learning (sensitivity, 0.950; specificity, 0.917). The diagnostic performances of these models in the test cohort were as follows: support vector machine (sensitivity, 0.750; specificity, 0.667), light gradient boosting machine (sensitivity, 0.500; specificity, 0.852) and ensemble learning (sensitivity, 0.667; specificity, 0.864). Machine learning models combining multiple risk factors can contribute to improving diagnostic performance of lateral lymph node metastasis.

An Unusual Delayed Complication after Rectal Surgery – 3 Case Reports

Abstract Rectal cancer treatment is challenging and rapidly advancing, and surgical resection is often the keystone treatment and curative modality. Anastomotic complications are the most severe and feared outcomes following rectal cancer surgery considering their associated morbidity and mortality. Delayed complications occurring many years after surgery are rare and less reported. Here, we report three cases of patients with rectal carcinoma who underwent low anterior resection and presented with delayed anastomotic complications. In all three cases, anastomotic complications were found beyond one month: postoperative 1 year, 7 years, and 9 years. Disease recurrence was ruled out in all patients. The patients presented with varied symptoms, namely a delayed presentation with a pelvic abscess along with a rectourethral fistula, a rectocutaneous fistula, and bladder wall necrosis. All of them had received radiation therapy preoperatively. Chronic radiation induces widespread intestinal collagen deposition and fibrosis along with occlusive vasculitis in small arterioles. These effects may develop over several months or years, which results in bowel strictures, ulcerations, and fistulas. Therefore, delayed complications such as anastomotic dehiscence, rectourethral fistulas, and rectocutaneous fistulas appearing after many years of pelvic surgery, especially in patients who received radiation, should be investigated. Therefore, long-term monitoring to identify potential complications is crucial as they are associated with high morbidity and mortality.

Is There any Benefit of Addition of Neo-Adjuvant Chemotherapy (FOLFOX4) to Standard Preoperative Treatment of Rectal Cancer? A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) before surgical intervention represents a unique therapeutic approach for the management of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) and has witnessed a notable rise in utilization within recent years. However, the efficacy and safety of this treatment remain subjects of ongoing debate and investigation. This randomized controlled trial aimed to evaluate the potential impact of administering induction chemotherapy (IC) before the conventional neoadjuvant concomitant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in LARC patients. patients with resectable stage II-III LARC were randomly allocated to receive either biweekly 6 cycles of FOLFOX4 regimen as IC followed by CRT and total mesorectal excision (TME) (experimental group) or nCRT followed by TME (control group). The primary endpoint was the rate of pathological complete response (pCR). The secondary endpoints encompassed the evaluation of treatment-related adverse events as well as the assessment of survival outcomes. 67 patients were enrolled in this study (32 in the experimental group and 35 in the control group). The median age of the patients was 45 years. Stage IIIB was observed in 46.3% of the patients. The patients who underwent induction chemotherapy demonstrated a notably higher rate of achieving pCR in comparison to the control group (28.1% vs 8.6%; P=0.001). There were no statistically significant differences observed in terms of their toxicity profile and survival outcomes. Implementation of induction chemotherapy utilizing the FOLFOX4 regimen has demonstrated a notable enhancement in the rate of pathological complete response. However, this improvement does not appear to translate into significant advancements in overall survival outcomes.

The effects of KRAS Mutations on the Prognosis of Rectal Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy and Surgery.

Rectal cancers with mutations in the KRAS gene have worse prognoses than wild-type malignancies. Variants at codon 12 of KRAS have particularly detrimental effects on prognosis. We aimed to analyze whether KRAS mutations act as adverse prognostic factors following neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and surgery for rectal cancer treatment. We analyzed the effects of KRAS mutations on disease-free survival (DFS) and locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS) in 125 patients with cT2-4N0-2M0 rectal cancer who underwent surgery following CRT between June 2014 and March 2023 Inje University Busan Paik Hospital. The median follow-up period was 39.7 (range, 7.5-98.2) months. There were 25 patients (20.0%) who harbored KRAS mutations. Among them, 22 patients (17.6%) had codon 12 variants. Overall, 43 patients (34.4%) showed recurrence, of which 10 (8.0%) had locoregional recurrence and 35 (28.0%) had distant metastases (two occurred simultaneously). DFS was significantly reduced in the patients with KRAS mutations (p = 0.005). LRFS was also reduced in patients with KRAS mutations (p = 0.039). DFS and LRFS were also relatively low in the subgroup with KRAS mutations at codon 12 (n = 22) (p = 0.003 and p = 0.017, respectively). However, pathologic complete response rate following CRT was not affected by KRAS mutations (p = 0.197). Overall survival was also not associated with KRAS mutations (p = 0.486). KRAS mutation is related to decreased DFS and LRFS, when surgery is performed following neoadjuvant CRT to treat rectal cancer. These effects are particularly pronounced for KRAS mutations at codon 12.

Comparative analysis of the short and medium-term efficacy of the Da Vinci robot versus laparoscopic total mesangectomy for rectal cancer.

The Da Vinci robot-assisted surgery technique has been widely used in laparoscopic mesangectomy for rectal cancer. However, the short-term efficacy of these procedures compared to traditional laparoscopic surgery remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to compare and analyze the short- and medium-term efficacy of Da Vinci robot and laparoscopic surgery in total mesangectomy (TME) for rectal cancer, so as to provide guidance and reference for clinical practice. To investigate the safety and long-term efficacy of robotic and laparoscopic total mesorectal resection for the treatment of rectal cancer. The clinicopathologic data of 240 patients who underwent TME for rectal cancer in the Anorectal Department of People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region from August 2018 to March 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 112 patients underwent laparoscopic TME (L-TME) group, and 128 patients underwent robotic TME (R-TME) group. The intraoperative, postoperative, and follow-up conditions of the two groups were compared. The conversion rate of the L-TME group was greater than that of the R-TME group (5.4% vs 0.8%, χ 2 = 4.417, P = 0.036). The complication rate of the L-TME group was greater than that of the R-TME group (32.1% vs 17.2%, χ 2 = 7.290, P = 0.007). The percentage of positive annular margins in the L-TME group was greater than that in the R-TME group (7.1% vs 1.6%, χ 2 = 4.658, P = 0.031). The 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate and overall survival (OS) rate of the L-TME group were lower than those of the R-TME group (74.1% vs 85.2%, χ 2 = 4.962, P = 0.026; 81.3% vs 91.4%, χ 2 = 5.494, P = 0.019); in patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer stage III DFS rate and OS rate in the L-TME group were significantly lower than those in the R-TME group (52.5% vs 76.1%, χ 2 = 5.799, P = 0.016; 65.0% vs 84.8%, χ 2 = 4.787, P = 0.029). Compared with the L-TME group, the R-TME group had a better tumor prognosis and was more favorable for patients with rectal cancer, especially for patients with stage III rectal cancer.

Combined Pubic Arch and Ischial Bone Resection for Metachronous and Frequent Local Recurrences of Rectal Cancer.

Complete surgical resection with negative margins remains the cornerstone for curative treatment of rectal cancer; however, local recurrence can pose a significant challenge. Herein, we aimed to introduce a novel surgical technique for combined resection of the pubic arch and ischial bone in the context of treating recurrent rectal cancer. We present a case of a patient with a fourth local recurrence of rectal cancer, with no evidence of distant metastasis. The tumor directly invaded the posterior wall of the pubic arch. To achieve complete tumor resection, an osteotomy was performed using a thread wire saw at the bilateral pubic rami and ischial bones. Intraoperative frozen section analysis (rapid tissue examination) was conducted on tissue samples from the lateral margins of the planned osteotomy line. Samples were negative for adenocarcinoma (cancerous cells). The combined resection of the pubic arch and ischial bone was successfully performed with negative margins for adenocarcinoma, as confirmed by frozen section analysis. Mastery of the surgical technique for combined resection of the pubic arch and ischial bone may be clinically significant for achieving complete resection in cases of multiple resections for locally recurrent rectal cancer.

Application value of artificial intelligence in surgical precision diagnosis and treatment of rectal cancer

Colorectal cancer is the most common malignant tumor of digestive tract, and the incidence of colorectal cancer in China is especially characterized by middle and low rectal cancer. In recent years, with the progress of computer science, artificial intelligence technology has developed rapidly, and has achieved a lot of application results in the medical field. At present, artificial intelligence technology has covered various stages of colorectal cancer, including screening, individualized assessment, auxiliary diagnosis and treatment decision-making, refined surgery and prognosis judgment, providing help for the accurate and individualized treatment of rectal cancer. However, the lack of standardized, systematic, and scalable AI models remains a major pain point for the field. Therefore, it is necessary to carry out large-scale prospective clinical studies on artificial intelligence model to further confirm its application value in the clinical diagnosis and treatment of rectal cancer.

High Rates of Organ Preservation in Rectal Cancer with Papillon Contact X-ray Radiotherapy: Results from a Swiss Cohort.

Rectal cancer typically necessitates a combination of radiotherapy (RT), chemotherapy, and surgery. The associated functional disorders and reduction in quality of life have led to an increasing interest in organ preservation strategies. Response strongly correlates with RT dose, but dose escalation with external beam remains limited even with modern external beam RT techniques because of toxicity of the surrounding tissues. This study reports on the use of Papillon, an endocavitary Radiotherapy device, in the treatment of rectal cancer. The device delivers low energy X-rays, allowing for safe dose escalation and better complete response rate. Between January 2015 and February 2024, 24 rectal cancer patients were treated with the addition of a boost delivered by Papillon to standard RT, with or without chemotherapy, in an upfront organ preservation strategy. After a median follow-up (FU) of 43 months, the organ preservation rate was 96% (23/24), and the local relapse rate was 8% (2/24). None of our patients developed grade 3 or more toxicities. Our results demonstrate that the addition of Papillon contact RT provides a high rate of local remission with sustained long-term organ preservation, offering a promising alternative to traditional surgical approaches in patients with rectal cancer.