Treatment Of Myasthenia Gravis Research Articles

Myasthenia Gravis Treatment: From Old Drugs to Innovative Therapies with a Glimpse into the Future.

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a rare autoimmune disease that causes debilitating muscle weakness due to impaired neuromuscular transmission. Since most (about 80-90%) MG patients present autoantibodies against the acetylcholine receptor, standard medical therapy consists of symptomatic treatment with acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (e.g., pyridostigmine). In addition, considering the autoimmune basis of MG, standard therapy includes immunomodulating agents, such as corticosteroids, azathioprine, cyclosporine A, and cyclophosphamide. New strategies have been proposed for the treatment of MG and include complement blockade (i.e., eculizumab, ravulizumab, and zilucoplan) and neonatal Fc receptor antagonism (i.e., efgartigimod and rozanolixizumab). The aim of this review is to provide a detailed overview of the pre- and post-marketing evidence on the five pharmacological treatments most recently approved for the treatment of MG, by identifying both preclinical and clinical studies registered in clinicaltrials.gov. A description of the molecules currently under evaluation for the treatment of MG is also provided.

Effectiveness and safety of telitacicept for refractory generalized myasthenia gravis: a retrospective study.

Refractory generalized myasthenia gravis (GMG) remains a substantial therapeutic challenge. Telitacicept, a recombinant human B-lymphocyte stimulator receptor-antibody fusion protein, holds promise for interrupting the immunopathology of this condition. This study retrospectively assessed the effectiveness and safety of telitacicept in patients with refractory GMG. A single-center retrospective study. Patients with refractory GMG receiving telitacicept (160 mg/week or biweekly) from January to September in 2023 were included. We assessed effectiveness using Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America post-intervention status (MGFA-PIS), myasthenia gravis treatment status and intensity (MGSTI), quantitative myasthenia gravis (QMG), and MG-activity of daily living (ADL) scores, alongside reductions in prednisone dosage at 3- and 6-month intervals. Safety profiles were also evaluated. Sixteen patients with MGFA class II-V refractory GMG were included, with eight females and eight males. All patients were followed up for at least 3 months, and 11 patients reached 6 months follow-up. At the 3-month evaluation, 75% (12/16) demonstrated clinical improvement with MGFA-PIS. One patient achieved pharmacological remission, two attained minimal manifestation status, and nine showed functional improvement; three remained unchanged, and one deteriorated. By the 6-month visit, 90.1% (10/11) sustained significant symptomatic improvement. MGSTI scores and prednisone dosages significantly reduced at both follow-ups (p < 0.05). MG-ADL and QMG scores showed marked improvement at 6 months (p < 0.05). The treatment was well tolerated, with no severe adverse events such as allergy or infection reported. Our exploratory investigation suggests that telitacicept is a feasible and well-tolerated add-on therapy for refractory GMG, offering valuable clinical evidence for this novel treatment option.

Eliciting Exploratory Patient Preference Data: A Case Study in a Rare Disease.

Qualitative and quantitative methods provide different and complementary insights into patients' preferences for treatment. The aim of this study was to use a novel, mixed-methods approach employing qualitative and quantitative approaches to generate preliminary insights into patient preferences for the treatment of a rare disease-generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG). We conducted a mixed-methods study to collect exploratory qualitative and quantitative patient preference information and generate informative results within a condensed timeline (about 4 months). Recruitment was facilitated by an international health research firm. Study participants first reviewed a brief document describing six treatment attributes (to facilitate more efficient review of the material during the focus groups) and were then provided a link to complete an online quantitative survey with a single risk threshold task. They then participated in online focus groups, during which they discussed qualitative questions about their experience with gMG treatment and completed up to three quantitative threshold tasks, the first of which repeated the threshold task from the online survey. The study elicited both quantitative data on 18 participants' risk tolerance and qualitative data on their treatment experience, additional treatment attributes of importance, the reasoning behind their preferences, and the trade-offs they were willing to make. Most participants (n=15) chose the same hypothetical treatment in the first threshold task in the online survey and the focus groups. Focus group discussions provided insights into participants' choices in the threshold tasks, confirmed that all the attributes were relevant, and helped clarify what was important about the attributes. Patient preference information can be collected using a variety of approaches, both qualitative and quantitative, tailored to fit the research needs of a study. The novel mixed-methods approach employed in this study efficiently captured patient preference data that were informative for exploratory research, internal decision making, and future research.

Effectiveness of early glucocorticoids in myasthenia gravis: a retrospective cohort study.

This study aimed to clarify the effect of early glucocorticoid (GC) application on achieving minimal manifestation (MM) status or better in the treatment of myasthenia gravis (MG) in the early clinical phase. A retrospective analysis was performed using data from 336 patients with MG who received GC therapy from January 2015 to September 2022 in the Zhengzhou University Henan Institute of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences Myasthenia Gravis Biobank (ZMB). Patients were divided into two groups: the early mono-GC group (treated with GC within 6 months of MG onset) and the delayed mono-GC group. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the early mono-GC group achieved MM status earlier and more frequently than the delayed mono-GC group (log-rank test, p = 0.0082; hazard ratio [HR], 1.66; p = 0.011). The early mono-GC group had a lower maintenance oral GC dose than the delayed mono-GC group. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, early mono-GC (HR, 1.50; p = 0.043), early-onset MG (EOMG) (HR, 1.74; p = 0.034), and ocular MG (OMG) (HR, 1.90; p = 0.007) were associated with MM status or better. In conclusion, early mono-GC, EOMG, and OMG were positive predictors of treatment goals. In EOMG, OMG, and acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive MG (AChR-MG) subgroups, the maintenance oral GC doses in the early mono-GC group were significantly lower than the doses in the delayed mono-GC group (p < 0.05). Early intervention with GC led to better long-term outcomes and reduced the necessary maintenance dose of oral GC for patients with MG. EOMG and OMG were positive predictors of MM status or better with mono-GC.

Extracellular vesicles encapsulated with caspase-1 inhibitor ameliorate experimental autoimmune myasthenia gravis through targeting macrophages

Cysteinyl aspartate-specific proteinase-1 (caspase-1) is a multifunctional inflammatory mediator in many inflammation-related diseases. Previous studies show that caspase-1 inhibitors produce effective therapeutic outcomes in a rat model of myasthenia gravis. However, tissue toxicity and unwanted off-target effects are the major disadvantages limiting their clinical application as therapeutic agents. This study shows that dendritic cell-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) loaded with a caspase-1 inhibitor (EVs-VX-765) are phagocytized mainly by macrophages, and caspase-1 is precisely expressed in macrophages. Furthermore, EVs-VX-765 demonstrates excellent therapeutic effects through a macrophage-dependent mechanism, and it notably inhibits the level of interleukin-1β and subsequently inhibits Th17 response and germinal center (GC) reactions. In addition, EVs-VX-765 demonstrates better therapeutic effects than routine doses of VX-765, although drug loading is much lower than routine doses, consequently reducing tissue toxicity. In conclusion, this study's findings suggest that EV-mediated delivery of caspase-1 inhibitors is effective for treating myasthenia gravis and is promising for clinical applications.

Pozelimab: First Approval.

Pozelimab (pozelimab-bbfg; VEOPOZ™) is a fully human immunoglobulin (Ig) G4P (i.e. IgG4 with a proline substitution to promote stabilization of the disulfide bonds between the two heavy chains) monoclonal antibody developed by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., to block the activity of complement factor 5 (C5) and prevent diseases mediated by the complement pathway. In August 2023, pozelimab received its first approval for the treatment of adults, and paediatric patients aged ≥ 1year with CD55-deficient protein-losing enteropathy (PLE), also known as CHAPLE disease, in the USA. It is the first US FDA-approved treatment for this disease. In the USA, pozelimab has been granted orphan drug designations for the treatment of paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria (PNH) [both as a monotherapy and in combination with cemdisiran] and for the treatment of myasthenia gravis (in combination with cemdisiran). Pozelimab is also undergoing clinical development in several other countries worldwide for the treatment of CD55-deficient PLE, PNH and myasthenia gravis. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of pozelimab leading to this first approval for the treatment of adults, and paediatric patients aged ≥ 1 year with CD55-deficient PLE, also known as CHAPLE disease, in the USA.

Rituximab as a sole steroid-sparing agent in generalized myasthenia gravis: Long-term outcomes.

Rituximab, a B-cell depleting monoclonal antibody, represents an option for the treatment of refractory myasthenia gravis (MG). Its use is more established in muscle-specific tyrosine kinase positive (MuSK +) patients, while its role in managing acetylcholine receptor positive (AChR +), or double seronegative (DSN) patients, remains less clear. This study evaluates the long-term effectiveness and safety of rituximab in MG of various serotypes. We conducted an open-label study of MG patients receiving rituximab. Adults with generalized refractory MG, either anti-AChR + or DSN, and anti-MuSK + , refractory or not, who had follow-up > 12months were selected. Change in quantitative myasthenia gravis (QMG) score at last follow-up, compared with baseline was a primary outcome, as well as factors affecting response to treatment. Secondary outcomes included, long-term safety, the steroid-sparing effect and relapse rates post-rituximab. Thirty patients (16 anti-AChR + , 6 anti-MuSK + , 8 DSN) followed for a mean of 33.3months were included. Mean scores pre-rituximab compared to last follow-up significantly decreased (p < 0.001), from 11 ± 4.1 to 4.3 ± 3.8, and from 1.9 to 0.3 regarding QMG and relapse rate per patient/year, respectively, while in 93.1% a daily steroid dose ≤ 10mg was achieved. Antibody status was the only factor independently influencing several endpoints. Throughout the study period no crises or deaths occurred. The present study supports that rituximab is an effective and well tolerated treatment for refractory anti-AChR + and DSN MG patients, while anti-MuSK + remains the group experiencing the greater benefits.

Critical Understanding of Myasthenia Gravis on the Basis of Vyadhi Ghatak

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune neuromuscular junction (NMJ) disorder characterized by weakness and fatigability of skeletal muscles. Myasthenia gravis has prevalence as high 200 in 100,000. It affects individuals in all age groups, but peak incidences occur in women in their twenties and thirties and in men in their fifties and sixties. Overall, women are affected more frequently than men, in a ratio of 3:2. It has bimodal age distribution. In MG, the fundamental defect is a decrease in the number of available AChRs at the postsynaptic muscle membrane. It presents with fluctuating skeletal muscle weakness and fatigue most commonly affecting the ocular muscles, although any muscle may be affected. In modern science treatment of Myasthenia gravis include anti-cholinesterase medications, glucocorticoids and other immunosuppressive agents. Long term use of steroid and immune modulator drugs has many adverse effects on other system of body. Ayurvedic therapies can give much more promising results. Comparison between myasthenia gravis and diseases explained in Ayurveda is difficult and exact correlation is not possible. But based on critical understanding of Vyadhighataka, a probable diagnosis can be made and treated accordingly. In this article, attempt is made to understand the pathogenesis of myasthenia gravis by considering the concepts of Dosha (vitiated Dosha), Dushya (vitiated Dushya), Aama, Agnimandya, and Srotovaigunya. For any disease pathology to begin, all components must be present. Pathogenesis of any disease will not occur without these elements.

Contribution of thymectomy in the treatment of myasthenia gravis

Contribution of thymectomy in the treatment of myasthenia gravis

Comparing Safety and Efficacy of Rituximab and Eculizumab in Treating Refractory Myasthenia Gravis: A Systematic Review

Myasthenia gravis is a common autoimmune disease in which patients experience weakness primarily in the ocular, respiratory, bulbar, and limb muscles. Although the symptoms of most patients with myasthenia gravis are well controlled with conventional immunotherapies, about 15% of them experience a refractory disease. This systematic review will focus on the safety and efficacy of monoclonal antibodies, specifically rituximab and eculizumab, in treating myasthenia gravis

Treatment of insomnia in myasthenia gravis-A prospective study on non-benzodiazepine hypnotics in the treatment of myasthenia gravis patients with insomnia.

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of non-benzodiazepine hypnotics in the treatment of myasthenia gravis (MG) patients with insomnia. This is a prospective longitudinal study. Outpatients who met the criteria for stable MG and insomnia diagnosis according to the International Classification of Sleep Disorders (third edition) were included in the study. They took a regular dose of non-benzodiazepine hypnotics (zolpidem 10 mg per night or zopiclone 7.5 mg per night) based on their own preferences. Patients received psychotherapy (including sleep health education) and were followed up for 4-5 weeks. Cases with lung diseases, respiratory disorders, or inappropriate use of hypnotic medications were excluded. The primary outcome is the difference in total Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) score between baseline and the end of follow-up period. Secondary outcomes include the difference in Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) score, 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire (GAD-7), and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) between baseline and the end of follow-up period and the safety of medication. A total of 75 MG patients with insomnia were included in this study. After 4-5 weeks of treatment, the total PSQI score and MG-ADL score were lower than baseline (p < 0.01). No patients had an increased MG-ADL score. The incidence rate of adverse events was 16.0% (12 cases), including dizziness (6 cases, 8.0%), drowsiness (3 cases, 4.0%), fatigue (2 cases, 2.7%), and nausea (1 case, 1.3%), all of which were mild. No patients had new onset breathing disorders. Non-benzodiazepine hypnotics are safe and effective for stable MG patients who need insomnia treatment.

Current drug treatment of myasthenia gravis.

Myasthenia Gravis (MG) is a rare neurological disorder affecting the neuromuscular junction. Clinical hallmarks are fatigability and weakness affecting the extraocular, axial, limb and/or respiratory muscles. Despite immunosuppressive treatment, mainly based on corticosteroids and nonsteroidal immunosuppressants, the burden of MG is still significant, both in terms of inadequate disease control and burdensome side effects. Driven by such limits, the past years have been characterized by an escalation of MG drug development, with novel molecules which now focuses on having a more targeted effect, with a higher safety and efficacy profile. As the pathogenic mechanism of MG are slowly being unravelled, new potential targets for treatments are being considered. This has led since 2017 to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approval of three new drugs that either act by blocking the complement system (i.e., eculizumab and ravulizumab) or by blocking the neonatal Fc receptor thus preventing immunoglobulin recycling and reducing imunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies (i.e., efgartigimod). Other drugs, with similar mechanism of action, are currently under review for approval. The repertoire of available and developmental therapies for MG is rapidly expanding, finally responding to the unmet need of a more targeted and effective therapeutic approach in MG.

Challenges managing myasthenia gravis: an international perspective

There have been increasing breakthroughs in the diagnosis and treatment of myasthenia gravis over the past decades. However, most published research in myasthenia is conducted in developed regions, such as the US, Canada and Europe. The challenges faced in these regions may be different from other areas of the world, often with fewer resources, such as fewer neurologists, limited or no access to specialised testing for myasthenia, and limited access to some interventions. During the 14th International Conference for Myasthenia Gravis and Myasthenic Disorders, we organized a panel of neurologists and researchers who work with people living with myasthenia in different world regions. The goal was to stimulate discussion around common challenges as well as those that are specific for given areas. Ultimately, we aimed to develop networks of clinicians caring for people living with myasthenia gravis around the world, to improve patient care. We present a summary of challenges using a case format by region, and a discussion around common threads and potential next steps.

MuSK-CAART: A novel precision cellular therapy for muscle-specific tyrosine kinase myasthenia gravis

Chimeric autoantibody receptor (CAAR) T cells are a novel genetically-engineered T cell immunotherapy that aims to durably eliminate antigen-specific B cells while sparing healthy B cells, ideally leading to safe and lasting remission of B cell-mediated autoimmune diseases with a one-time infusion. We describe the preclinical development of muscle-specific tyrosine kinase CAAR T cells (MuSK-CAART) for the treatment of MuSK myasthenia gravis, a debilitating autoantibody-mediated disease that causes potentially life-threatening muscle weakness.

Symptomatic, pharmacological treatment of myasthenia gravis.

Symptomatic, pharmacological treatment of myasthenia gravis.

Congenital myasthenic syndromes: beta adrenergic receptor agonist treatment

Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, such as pyridostigmine, are the standard symptomatic treatment for myasthenia gravis, and so have naturally been applied to the genetic forms of myasthenia, termed congenital myasthenic syndromes (CMS). Although effective for many CMS in others there was no clear response and in some it was positively harmful. Now, with greater understanding of the mutations and molecular mechanisms underlying CMS, treatments can be tailored for the specific syndrome and depending on diseases severity and patient response this can include utilizing different combinations of the drugs. In CMS, over the last 15-20 years b2-adrenergic receptor agonists have moved from occasional use to a mainstream medication. Many cases show life-transforming improvement both when the b2-adrenergic receptor agonists are used alone or in combination. Here we feature how the identification of DOK7-CMS first highlighted the consistent benefit of b2-adrenergic receptor agonists as medication and how it’s application to many different CMS subtypes evolved. The molecular pathogenic mechanisms for many CMS subtypes are now established and this report will also discuss a hypothetical rationale for which forms of CMS are likely to benefit from the b2-adrenergic receptor agonists.

Promising Antigen-specific Immunotherapy for the Treatment of Myasthenia Gravis

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a T cell-dependent, antibody-mediated, autoimmune disorder with well-established antigenic targets at the neuromuscular junction. MG autoantibodies mainly target the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (AChR) and especially epitopes located in the extracellular domain of the α1 subunit (α1-ECD). Today, most therapeutic regimens for MG are non-specific and not curative, requiring chronic treatments that are associated with significant side effects. We aim to develop an antigen-specific therapeutic approach, based on reestablishing tolerance towards the AChR, the dominant autoantigen in MG. To this end, we used a soluble mutated form of the human α1-ECD, which incorporates a major fraction of MG autoreactive T cell epitopes and examined the therapeutic efficiency of intravenous administration in a rat experimental autoimmune MG model. We found that repeated intravenous administration of α1-ECD for up to 12 days led to a robust amelioration of disease symptoms in a dose and time-dependent manner. The observed therapeutic effect of α1-ECD was significantly better than the effect of two current mainstay drugs for MG treatment. There were no signs of toxicity in α1-ECD-treated animals and further studies are underway to fully elucidate the immunological mechanism underlying the treatment effect. Taken together, our preclinical data strongly suggest that intravenous administration of α1-ECD may represent an efficacious and safe strategy to treat MG and thus α1-ECD represents a new drug candidate for clinical application in MG.

Complement inhibition in Myasthenia – from basics to RCT data

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is the prototypic autoimmune neurological disorder causing fatiguable muscle weakness either limited to the ocular muscles or becoming generalised involving the limb and bulbar muscles. Nine out of 10 generalised MG patients have IgG1 or IgG3 antibodies against the acetylcholine receptor (AChR). AChR antibodies cause neuromuscular weakness by internalisation of AChR, receptor blockade and by activating the complement pathway. Complement activation causes formation of the membrane attack complex (MAC) leading to degradation of the neuromuscular junction (NMJ). Several animal models have confirmed the role of complement in the pathogenesis of MG, with the experimental models (EAMG) often needing complement inhibitory therapies to prevent or reverse the disease. Various molecules that target the complement system have now been developed to treat myasthenia gravis. The vast majority of the currently studied molecules target the C5 protein, thereby preventing the formation of MAC and subsequent NMJ destruction. The currently studied anti-complement therapies for MG include Eculizumab, Zilucoplan, Ravulizumab, Pozelimab, Cemdisiran, Gefurilimab, Danicopan and few others in the pipeline. Eculizumab has been shown in clinical trials to be effective in the treatment of refractory MG, but further sub-group analysis and real-life experience have shown that this can be beneficial in various patients including those receiving regular IVIG, plasma exchange or Rituximab. It was approved for use by FDA in Oct 2017. Ravulizumab is a long-acting monoclonal antibody which has similar mechanism of action to Eculizumab and was approved for use in MG by FDA in April 2022. Zilucoplan is a macrocyclic peptide which binds to C5 and C5b thus preventing terminal complement activation, which can be given subcutaneously (FDA new drug application accepted in Nov 2022). Many of these have also been shown to have long term benefit in different sub-groups of patients with MG. Patients would need to be vaccinated against Neisseria meningitidis because of the risk of Gram-negative septicaemia, although no major safety signatures have been noted in the studies so far. Future studies may be able to identify specific biomarkers which might aid in selecting the most appropriate patients who might respond to these therapies.

Myasthenia gravis treatment in the elderly presents with a significant iatrogenic risk: a multicentric retrospective study.

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disease treated with acetylcholinesterase inhibitors and immunosuppressant/immunomodulatory drugs. MG is frequently diagnosed in elderly patients, a fragile population in which treatment adverse effects (TAE) have not been evaluated until now. We retrospectively analysed the files of all MG patients with disease onset after age 70years in four French University Hospitals, including clinical, electrophysiological, biological, and treatment data, with an emphasis on TAE. MG outcomes were assessed using the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) status scale. We included 138 patients (59% of men) with a mean follow-up of 4.5years (range 1-19). Mean age at diagnosis was 78years (70-93). Anti-acetylcholine receptor antibodies were found in 87% of cases, electrophysiological abnormalities in 82%, and thymoma in 10%. MG outcome was good in a majority of cases, with 76% of treated patients presenting with alleviated symptoms at follow-up. TAE were observed in 41% of patients, including severe TAE in 14% of cases. Seven patients (5.1%) died, including four (2.9%) from MG-related respiratory failure, and three (2.2%) from MG treatment-related complications, i.e., sepsis in 2 cases and brain toxoplasmosis in 1 case. TAE were observed in 53% of patients treated with azathioprine, 23% of patients treated with corticosteroids, and 15% of patients treated with mycophenolate mofetil. This retrospective study demonstrates MG in the elderly presents with a significant iatrogenic risk, including fatal immunosuppressant-related infections.

Measuring the Efficacy of Thymectomy for Pediatric Myasthenia Gravis Across Tertiary Children's Hospitals

BackgroundThymectomy is a treatment for pediatric myasthenia gravis, but the efficacy over time is unknown. Multi-institutional data are also lacking. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine the efficacy of thymectomy for pediatric myasthenia gravis using medication burden and health care utilization as proxies for disease severity. MethodsThis was a cross-sectional study of the Pediatric Health Information System database among children who underwent thymectomy at one of 49 children's hospitals from 2004 to 2022. Differences in annual median number of doses of myasthenia-related medications, admissions, and health care costs in the year before thymectomy to three years after were compared. A comparison cohort that did not undergo thymectomy was utilized. Medians were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Generalized linear regression estimated the effect of surgical approach on outcomes. ResultsA total of451 patients (238 patients who underwent thymectomy and 213 nonthymectomy patients) were identified. Following thymectomy, the decrease in annual median total number of myasthenia-related doses was 12.0 (interquartile range: 6 to 31) (P < 0.001). The decrease in number of annual admissions was 2.0 (1 to 4) (P < 0.001), which represented a cost difference of $5292 ($3533 to $8681) (P < 0.001). No differences were observed in the control cohort. In a generalized linear regression model, surgical approach was not associated with the efficacy of thymectomy (P = 0.55). ConclusionsThymectomy is an effective treatment for pediatric myasthenia gravis, evidenced by the decreased medication burden and health care utilization after surgery. Surgical approach did not influence the success of surgery. Thymectomy should be considered earlier in the treatment algorithm.