Rifampicin-resistant Tuberculosis Treatment Research Articles

A non-randomized pragmatic historically controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness and safety of a bedaquiline or a linezolid-based short regimen for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis

Short all-oral regimens for Rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (ShORRT) have been a turning point in the treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis. Despite this, access to drugs, stockouts, or adverse effects may limit the use of the recommended regimens. Pragmatic non-randomized trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of a ShORRT strategy for the treatment of rifampicin-resistant Tuberculosis (RR-TB) at the Hospital Nossa Senhora da Paz (Angola). The strategy assigned participants to receive a bedaquiline (BDQ) or a linezolid-based (LZF) regimen supplemented with levofloxacin, clofazimine, and cycloserine for up to 9 months. One hundred and twenty-one participants with pulmonary RR-TB were treated with the ShORRT strategy; 69 received the bedaquiline- and 52 the linezolid-based regimen. Overall, 98 (81%) participants had successful treatment outcomes, which was significantly higher compared to a 20-month historical injectable-based regimen (successful outcome rate including cure and treatment completed: 53.7%) (p<0.001). No significant differences between treatment success rates (85.5% vs. 75.0%), treatment failure (0.0% vs. 1.9%), death (5.8% vs. 13.5%), or lost to follow-up (LTFU) (8.7% vs. 9.6%) were seen between the BDQ and the LZF-based regimen. Globally, 72 adverse events (AE) occurred in 36 (29.7%) participants. Eighteen (14.9%) of these were grade ≥3 and were more frequently observed in those receiving the LZD-based regimen (p=0.02). The ShORRT strategy with a nine-month BDQ- or LZD-based regimen supports the efficacy of shorter all-oral regimens for the treatment of RR-TB and presents real-world data from schemes without bedaquiline, nitroimidazole, or injectables.

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Moxifloxacin and Levofloxacin in a Short Standardised Rifampicin Resistant TB Regimen: A STREAM 2 Secondary Analysis.

(1) Background: The World Health Organisation (WHO) categorises moxifloxacin and levofloxacin as Group A drugs, which should be prioritised in the treatment of rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis. We compare their relative efficacy and safety using data from the STREAM trial; (2) Methods: Marginal structural models were used to balance differences in the baseline characteristics of participants receiving the STREAM control regimen containing either moxifloxacin or levofloxacin as this was not a randomised comparison. The difference in proportions between regimens was estimated for favourable outcome, any grade 3/4 adverse event, QTcF increase to ≥500 ms, QTcF increase from baseline by at least 60 ms, and any grade 3/4 adverse event excluding QT events, using weighted analyses; (3) Results: In efficacy analyses (n = 123), the weighted risk difference (moxifloxacin-levofloxacin, wRD) for a favourable outcome was -0.045 (-0.213, 0.123), p = 0.60. Similarly, estimates from the safety analyses (n = 127) showed no evidence of a difference between the fluoroquinolones, other than a suggestion of fewer QTcF increases from baseline on levofloxacin (wRD 0.160 (-0.026, 0.346), p = 0.091); (4) Conclusions: In this small dataset, we found no statistically significant difference in key efficacy or safety outcomes between the moxifloxacin- and levofloxacin-containing regimens; there was a suggestion that QTcF increases from baseline were fewer on levofloxacin.

Impact of bedaquiline resistance probability on treatment decision for rifampicin-resistant TB

&lt;sec&gt;&lt;title&gt;BACKGROUND&lt;/title&gt;Accurate diagnosis of bedaquiline (BDQ) resistance remains challenging. A Bayesian approach expresses this uncertainty as a probability of BDQ resistance (prBDQR) with a 95% credible interval. We investigated how prBDQR information influences BDQ prescribing decisions.&lt;/sec&gt;&lt;sec&gt;&lt;title&gt;METHOD&lt;/title&gt;We performed a discrete choice experiment with 55 international rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis physicians. We employed mixed-effects multinomial logistic regression to quantify the effect of prBDQR, patient attributes, and contextual factors on the decision to continue BDQ or not when sequencing results become available.&lt;/sec&gt;&lt;sec&gt;&lt;title&gt;RESULTS&lt;/title&gt;PrBDQR was the most influential factor for BDQ decision-making, three times greater than treatment response. Each percentage point increase in prBDQR resulted in 8.2% lower odds (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.90–0.93) of continuing BDQ as a fully effective drug and 5.0% lower odds (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.94–0.96) of continuing it but not counting it as an effective drug. The most favourable patient profile for prescribing BDQ as a fully effective drug was a patient receiving the BPaLM regimen (BDQ, pretomanid, linezolid and moxifloxacin) with low prBDQR, good 1-month treatment response, fluoroquinolone-susceptible TB, and no prior BDQ treatment. Physicians with higher discomfort with uncertainty and more years of experience with BDQ were more inclined to stop BDQ.&lt;/sec&gt;&lt;sec&gt;&lt;title&gt;CONCLUSION&lt;/title&gt;Given the uncertainty of genotype-phenotype associations, physicians valued prBDQR for BDQ decision-making in rifampicin-resistant TB treatment.&lt;/sec&gt;

Clofazimine and QT prolongation in the treatment of rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis: Findings of aDSM in Taiwan

BackgroundBedaquiline, delamanid and fluoroquinolones are associated with increased QTcF. Whether clofazimine is associated with QTcF prolongation is less clear. MethodsAll patients with rifampicin-resistant TB enrolled between May 2017 and Dec 2019 were included. ECGs were performed at baseline, month 1, month 3 and month 6 for patients treated with conventional regimens, and at additional timepoint for patients treated with bedaquiline, delamanid and short regimen. We estimated the maximum increase of QTcF and constructed cox proportional hazards models to assess factors associated with QTcF≥501ms. ResultsAmong 321 patients, 59 (18.4%) patients had QTcF≥501ms during a mean follow-up of 242 days (median 189, range 4–1091). The median maximum increase of QTcF was 43.4 ms (IQR 31.3–65.9) in patients treated with clofazimine. Treatment with clofazimine was significantly associated with QTcF≥501ms as compared to without clofazimine (adjusted hazards ratio (adjHR) 4.35, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.01–9.44). Among patients not treated with bedaquiline and delamanid, those treated with clofazimine and a fluoroquinolone (adjHR 3.43, 95% CI 1.61–7.34) and those treated with clofazimine and high dose moxifloxacin (adjHR 6.54, 95% CI 2.43–17.60) had a significantly higher risk of QTcF≥501ms as compared to those treated with a fluoroquinolone without other QTcF prolonging agents. Four (1.6%) patients had documented ventricular tachycardia, in which one was Torsade de pointes. One patient was found to have sudden death during hospitalization. ConclusionsClofazimine was significantly associated with an increased risk of QTcF prolongation. QTcF≥501ms was potentially associated with fatal event and needed to be managed cautiously.

Safety of high-dose amikacin in the first week of all-oral rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis treatment for the prevention of acquired resistance (STAKE): protocol for a single-arm clinical trial

IntroductionAn effective rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (RR-TB) treatment regimen should include prevention of resistance amplification. While bedaquiline (BDQ) has been recommended in all-oral RR-TB treatment regimen since 2019, resistance is rising at...

Emerging bedaquiline resistance: A threat to the global fight against drug-resistant tuberculosis

Bedaquiline resistance is increasingly observed in the treatment of rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (TB), yet standardized regimens for managing bedaquiline-resistant TB are lacking. Studies indicate a high proportion of bedaquiline-resistant cases have previously been treated for TB, and often involve strains resistant to quinolones. Regular monitoring of the culture status in patients receiving bedaquiline resistance treatment is advised. Methods such as experimental evolution, protein modeling, genome sequencing, and phenotypic analysis have been instrumental in identifying the mechanisms of bedaquiline resistance. Specifically, variants in the Rv0678 transcriptional repressor of the MmpS5-MmpL5 efflux system are linked to this type of resistance. Bayesian probability estimates show promise in determining the genotypic–phenotypic association for bedaquiline resistance, suggesting potential utility in clinical practice. Future research should explore the practical application of Bayesian probabilities in managing bedaquiline resistance. Sequencing-based technologies are anticipated to play a vital role in the early detection and management of drug-resistant TB strains.

Treatment of MDR, Pre-XDR, XDR, and Rifampicin-Resistant Tuberculosis or in Case of Intolerance to at Least Rifampicin in Austria, Germany, and Switzerland.

Based on the assessment of new evidence, the World Health Organization (WHO) updated its guidelines for the treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis (TB) in December 2022. The new recommendations and the latest study data made it necessary to update the existing guideline on the treatment of at least rifampicin-resistant TB (RR-TB) for the German-speaking countries, replacing the respective chapters of the treatment guidelines published in 2022. A shortened treatment of proven RR-TB and multidrug-resistant TB for at least 6 months using the fixed and non-modifiable drug combination of bedaquiline, pretomanid, linezolid, and moxifloxacin (BPaLM) is now also recommended for Austria, Germany, and Switzerland under certain conditions considering the existing barriers for the implementation of the new treatment regimen. For the treatment of pre-extensively drug-resistant (pre-XDR-) TB, an individualized treatment for 18 months continues to be the primary recommendation. The non-modifiable drug combination of bedaquiline, pretomanid, and linezolid (BPaL) may be used alternatively in selected pre-XDR-TB cases, provided that all prerequisites are met. The necessary requirements for using BPaLM and BPaL are presented in detail in this amendment to the consensus-based TB treatment guideline for adult patients.

Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Group A and B Anti-Tuberculosis Drugs Used in Treatment of Rifampicin-Resistant Tuberculosis during Pregnancy and Post-Partum: A Narrative Review.

Recommendations for treatment of rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (RR-TB) during pregnancy and post-partum now include Group A and B antituberculosis drugs. While pharmacokinetic data for most of these drugs among adults receiving treatment for RR-TB are limited, the data from pregnant patients and their infants are extremely scarce. Existing data suggest that fluoroquinolones, bedaquiline, clofazimine and terizidone may be used safely in pregnancy. Pharmacokinetic exposures, particularly between trimesters, are potentially sub-optimal; however, there is currently no evidence to support dose adjustment during pregnancy. Linezolid poses a potentially serious toxicity risk, particularly as exposures appear to be high in the later stages of pregnancy and post-partum following extended use, but this should be considered alongside the benefits of this extremely effective drug in the treatment of this life-threatening disease. While plenty of questions remain regarding the exposure to Group A and B antituberculosis drugs through breastmilk, existing literature suggests minimal harm to the breastfed infant. Pregnant patients and their infants should be included in therapeutic trials and pharmacokinetic studies of effective antituberculosis drugs.

Piloting a new method to estimate action thresholds in medicine through intuitive weighing

ObjectivesIn clinical decision-making, physicians take actions such as prescribing treatment only when the probability of disease is sufficiently high. The lowest probability at which the action will be considered, is...

Optimizing dosing of the cycloserine pro-drug terizidone in children with rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis.

There are no pharmacokinetic data in children on terizidone, a pro-drug of cycloserine and a World Health Organization (WHO)-recommended group B drug for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (RR-TB) treatment. We collected pharmacokinetic data in children <15 years routinely receiving 15-20 mg/kg of daily terizidone for RR-TB treatment. We developed a population pharmacokinetic model of cycloserine assuming a 2-to-1 molecular ratio between terizidone and cycloserine. We included 107 children with median (interquartile range) age and weight of 3.33 (1.55, 5.07) years and 13.0 (10.1, 17.0) kg, respectively. The pharmacokinetics of cycloserine was described with a one-compartment model with first-order elimination and parallel transit compartment absorption. Allometric scaling using fat-free mass best accounted for the effect of body size, and clearance displayed maturation with age. The clearance in a typical 13 kg child was estimated at 0.474 L/h. The mean absorption transit time when capsules were opened and administered as powder was significantly faster compared to when capsules were swallowed whole (10.1 vs 72.6 min) but with no effect on bioavailability. Lower bioavailability (-16%) was observed in children with weight-for-age z-score below -2. Compared to adults given 500 mg daily terizidone, 2022 WHO-recommended pediatric doses result in lower exposures in weight bands 3-10 kg and 36-46 kg. We developed a population pharmacokinetic model in children for cycloserine dosed as terizidone and characterized the effects of body size, age, formulation manipulation, and underweight-for-age. With current terizidone dosing, pediatric cycloserine exposures are lower than adult values for several weight groups. New optimized dosing is suggested for prospective evaluation.

Estimating the effect of a rifampicin resistant tuberculosis diagnosis by the Xpert MTB/RIF assay on two-year mortality.

Studies assessing patient-centred outcomes of novel rifampicin resistant tuberculosis (RR-TB) diagnostics are rare and mostly apply conventional methods which may not adequately address biases. Even though the Xpert MTB/RIF molecular assay was endorsed a decade ago for simultaneous diagnosis of tuberculosis and RR-TB, the impact of the assay on mortality among people with RR-TB has not yet been assessed. We analysed data of an observational prospective cohort study (EXIT-RIF) performed in South Africa. We applied a causal inference approach using inverse odds of sampling weights to rectify survivor bias and selection bias caused by differing screening guidelines. We also adjusted for confounding using a marginal structural model with inverse probability of treatment weights. We estimated the total effect of an RR-TB diagnosis made by the Xpert assay versus the pre-Xpert diagnostic algorithm (entailing a targeted Line Probe Assay (LPA) among TB-confirmed patients) on two-year mortality and we assessed mediation by RR-treatment initiation. Of the 749 patients diagnosed with RR-TB [247 (33%) by the pre-Xpert diagnostic algorithm and 502 (67%) by the Xpert assay], 42.7% died. Of these, 364 (48.6%) patients died in the pre-Xpert group and 200 (39.8%) in the Xpert group. People diagnosed with RR-TB by the Xpert assay had a higher odds of RR-TB treatment initiation compared to those diagnosed by the targeted LPA-based diagnostic process (OR 2.79; 95%CI 2.19-3.56). Receiving an RR-TB diagnosis by Xpert resulted in a 28% reduction in the odds of mortality within 2 years after presentation to the clinic (ORCI 0.72; 95%CI 0.53-0.99). Causal mediation analysis suggests that the higher rate of RR-TB treatment initiation in people diagnosed by the Xpert assay explains the effect of Xpert on 2-year mortality [natural indirect effect odds ratio 0.90 (95%CI 0.85-0.96). By using causal inference methods in combination with high quality observational data, we could demonstrate that the introduction of the Xpert assay caused a 28% reduction in 2-year odds of mortality of RR-TB. This finding highlights the need for advocacy for a worldwide roll-out of rapid molecular tests. Because the effect is mainly caused by increased RR-TB treatment initiation, health care systems should also ensure timely initiation of effective treatment upon an RR-TB diagnosis.

Linezolid-related adverse effects in the treatment of rifampicin resistant tuberculosis: a retrospective study

Linezolid (LZD) is an effective drug in treating multidrug-resistant tuberculosis and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis. This study aimed to evaluate the safety of LZD in the treatment of patients with rifampicin resistant tuberculosis. This was a multicenter retrospective study. A total of 184 patients of the rifampicin resistant tuberculosis patients treated with LZD from Jan 2018 to Apr 2020 in three hospitals were involved, and their clinical symptoms were recorded and analyzed. Meanwhile, the types and incidence of adverse effects associated with LZD were evaluated. It showed that peripheral neuritis (51, 27.7%) and hemochromatosis (42, 22.8%) were the most common adverse effects observed among these patients. The median time of symptoms after LZD treatment was 45.5 and 120.0 days, respectively. Furthermore, female patients had a significantly higher risk for leukopenia (P = 0.002) and hemochromatosis (P = 0.033) when compared with male patients. History of underlying disease was the risk factor for thrombocytopenia (P = 0.022). Patients with long duration of medication (RR = 1.004, 95%CI: 1.002–1.006, P < 0.001) and daily dosage ≥600mg (RR = 3.059, 95%CI: 1.238–7.558, P = 0.015) were at higher risk of hemochromatosis. Age was the risk factor for rash (P = 0.008) and nausea and vomiting (P = 0.018). In addition, LZD administration time was the risk factor for optic neuritis (P < 0.001) and peripheral neuritis (P < 0.001). LZD can cause adverse symptoms in patients with rifampicin resistant tuberculosis. Gender, history of underlying disease, LZD use time, LZD dosage, and age are the risk factors in the LZD treatment of these patients. During medication, bone marrow suppression and neuropathy should be closely monitored. This study could potentially provide useful information for the clinical practice.

Low Body Mass Index at Treatment Initiation and Rifampicin-Resistant Tuberculosis Treatment Outcomes: An Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis.

The impact of low body mass index (BMI) at initiation of rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (RR-TB) treatment on outcomes is uncertain. We evaluated the association between BMI at RR-TB treatment initiation and end-of-treatment outcomes. We performed an individual participant data meta-analysis of adults aged ≥18 years with RR-TB whose BMI was documented at treatment initiation. We compared odds of any unfavorable treatment outcome, mortality, or failure/recurrence between patients who were underweight (BMI <18.5 kg/m2) and not underweight. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using logistic regression, with matching on demographic, clinical, and treatment-related factors. We evaluated effect modification by human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) status and other variables using likelihood ratio tests. We also estimated cumulative incidence of mortality during treatment stratified by HIV. Overall, 5148 patients were included; 1702 (33%) were underweight at treatment initiation. The median (interquartile range) age was 37 years (29 to 47), and 455 (9%) had HIV. Compared with nonunderweight patients, the aOR among underweight patients was 1.7 (95% CI, 1.4-1.9) for any unfavorable outcome, 3.1 (2.4-3.9) for death, and 1.6 (1.2-2.0) for failure/recurrence. Significant effect modification was found for World Health Organization region of treatment. Among HIV-negative patients, 24-month mortality was 14.8% (95% CI, 12.7%-17.3%) for underweight and 5.6% (4.5%-7.0%) for not underweight patients. Among patients with HIV, corresponding values were 33.0% (25.6%-42.6%) and 20.9% (14.1%-27.6%). Low BMI at treatment initiation for RR-TB is associated with increased odds of unfavorable treatment outcome, particularly mortality.

Definitive outcomes in patients with rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis treated in Niger from 2012 to 2019: A retrospective cohort study.

Outcomes of retreatment for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (RR-TB) are rarely reported. We report 'definitive outcomes' after a cascade approach to RR-TB treatment. After a bacteriologically adverse outcome for the 9-months fluoroquinolone-based Short Treatment Regimen (STR), patients were retreated with a bedaquiline-based regimen (BDQ-regimen). A Retrospective cohort study of RR-TB patients treated with the STR during 2012-2019 and retreated with a BDQ-regimen in case of failure or relapse was conducted. Definitive relapse-free cure took into account BDQ-regimen outcomes. Of 367 patients treated with the STR, 20 (5.4%) experienced failure or relapse. Out of these 20 patients, 14 started a BDQ-regimen, of whom none experienced failure or relapse. Definitive end of treatment outcomes of STR after revising with third-line BDQ-regimen outcomes, 84.7% (311/367) were cured relapse-free, 10.6% (39/367) died during treatment and 3.0% (11/367) were lost to follow-up during treatment with either the STR or BDQ-regimen. Six patients (1.6%; 6/367) with STR failure/relapse died before starting a BDQ-regimen. No patient had definitive treatment failure or relapse and remained without treatment. If fluoroquinolone resistance is excluded or rare, it is beneficial to use fluoroquinolone as the core drug for a first RR-TB treatment regimen and to safeguard bedaquiline for those in need of retreatment.

Early mortality during rifampicin-resistant TB treatment.

SUMMARYBACK GROUND:Data suggest that treatment with newer TB drugs (linezolid [LZD], bedaquiline [BDQ] and delamanid [DLM]), used in Khayelitsha, South Africa, since 2012, reduces mortality due to rifampicin-resistant TB (RR-TB).METHODS:This was a retrospective cohort study to assess 6-month mortality among RR-TB patients diagnosed between 2008 and 2019.RESULTS:By 6 months, 236/2,008 (12%) patients died; 12% (78/651) among those diagnosed in 2008–2011, and respectively 8% (49/619) and 15% (109/738) with and without LZD/BDQ/DLM in 2012–2019. Multivariable analysis showed a small, non-significant mortality reduction with LZD/BDQ/DLM use compared to the 2008–2011 period (aOR 0.79, 95% CI 0.5–1.2). Inpatient treatment initiation (aOR 3.2, 95% CI 2.4–4.4), fluoroquinolone (FQ) resistance (aOR 2.7, 95% CI 1.8–4.2) and female sex (aOR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1–2.0) were also associated with mortality. When restricted to 2012–2019, use of LZD/BDQ/DLM was associated with lower mortality (aOR 0.58, 95% CI 0.39–0.87).CONCLUSIONS:While LZD/BDQ/DLM reduced 6-month mortality between 2012 and 2019, there was no significant effect overall. These findings may be due to initially restricted LZD/BDQ/DLM use for those with high-level resistance or treatment failure. Additional contributors include increased treatment initiation among individuals who would have otherwise died before treatment due to universal drug susceptibility testing from 2012, an effect that also likely contributed to higher mortality among females (survival through to care-seeking).

Treatment outcomes and safety in children with rifampicin-resistant TB.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of rifampicin-resistant TB (RR-TB) in children is evolving rapidly. As newer regimens are introduced into routine care, it is vital to compare their outcome and safety with well-characterised clinical cohorts treated with historical regimens.METHODS: Study sample comprised a prospective observational cohort of children on routine RR-TB treatment, enrolled from 2011 to 2015 in Cape Town, South Africa. Children were followed for safety, treatment response and outcome.RESULTS: Of 136 children included, 27 (19.9%) were living with HIV and 48 (37.8%) had severe TB. The median time-to-culture conversion in children with bacteriological confirmation (n = 44) was 28.5 days (IQR 14.5-45). Overall, 118/129 (91.5%) had favourable TB treatment outcomes. Of 106 (77.9%) children who received an injectable drug, 9 (8.5%) developed hearing loss and 7/136 (5.1%) developed other Grade 3 or higher adverse events likely related to treatment.CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort with a substantial proportion of children with severe manifestations of TB and with HIV, TB treatment outcomes were excellent. Apart from hearing loss, few children developed severe adverse events related to treatment. This study provides robust reference data for future evaluation of shorter, injectable-sparing regimens.

Implementing a Substance-Use Screening and Intervention Program for People Living with Rifampicin-Resistant Tuberculosis: Pragmatic Experience from Khayelitsha, South Africa.

Substance use (SU) is associated with poor rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (RR-TB) treatment outcomes. In 2017, a SBIRT (SU screening-brief intervention-referral to treatment) was integrated into routine RR-TB care in Khayelitsha, South Africa. This was a retrospective study of persons with RR-TB who were screened for SU between 1 July 2018 and 30 September 2020 using the ASSIST (Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test). Here we describe outcomes from this program. Persons scoring moderate/high risk received a brief intervention and referral to treatment. Overall, 333 persons were initiated on RR-TB treatment; 38% (n = 128) were screened for SU. Of those, 88% (n = 113/128) reported SU; 65% (n = 83/128) had moderate/high risk SU. Eighty percent (n = 103/128) reported alcohol use, of whom 52% (n = 54/103) reported moderate/high risk alcohol use. Seventy-seven persons were screened for SU within ≤2 months of RR-TB treatment initiation, of whom 69%, 12%, and 12% had outcomes of treatment success, loss to follow-up and death, respectively. Outcomes did not differ between persons with no/low risk and moderate/high risk SU or based on the receipt of naltrexone (p > 0.05). SU was common among persons with RR-TB; there is a need for interventions to address this co-morbidity as part of “person-centered care”. Integrated, holistic care is needed at the community level to address unique challenges of persons with RR-TB and SU.

The Analysis of Missing Cases on the Treatment of Rifampicin-Resistant Tuberculosis

To describe the follow-up treatment of Resistant Rifampicin in health care facilities based on the results of the gene-Xpert examination. The study design was cross-sectional using data from "Evaluation study of detection of TB cases with the rapid molecular test in Indonesia in 2018". The data resources were from 42 hospitals and two primary health care facilities having conducted the gene-Xpert examination at least six months in 42 districts, 26 provinces in Indonesia. The number of TB diagnoses with gene-Xpert from health facilities was 33,630 cases, 31.6% of those cases were TB positive, namely rifampicin sensitivity of 89% (9,456) and rifampicin-resistant of 11% (1,171). 29% of resistant rifampicin tuberculosis cases were missing cases consisting of the untreated and unknown follow-up treatment of 18% and 11%, respectively. Missing cases were mostly found in males of 66.1%. Based on the age, 76.9% of the missing cases were in productive age, such as 15 to 54 years. Moreover, according to the TB treatment history and origin of the case, missing cases were found in new cases, 54.4%, and the existing health facility 51.2%. The most reason for missing the RR-TB case in the follow-up treatment was the refusal of treatment 40.3%. The high non-compliance to TB treatment was caused by inadequate general knowledge about TB, lack of social support, medication side effects, and long treatment period, which were posed as barriers to adherence to treatment.

Health care seeking patterns of rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis patients in Harare, Zimbabwe: A prospective cohort study.

Delays in seeking and accessing treatment for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (RR-TB) and multi-drug resistant (MDR-TB) are major impediments to TB control in high-burden, resource-limited settings. We prospectively determined health-seeking behavioural patterns and associations with treatment outcomes and costs among 68 RR-TB patients attending conveniently selected facilities in a decentralised system in Harare, Zimbabwe. From initial symptoms to initiation of effective treatment, patients made a median number of three health care visits (IQR 2-4 visits) at a median cost of 13% (IQR 6-31%) of their total annual household income (mean cost, US$410). Cumulatively, RR-TB patients most frequently first visited private facilities, i.e., private pharmacies (30%) and other private health care providers (24%) combined. Median patient delay was 26 days (IQR 14-42 days); median health system delay was 97 days (IQR 30-215 days) and median total delay from symptom onset to initiation of effective treatment was 132 days (IQR 51-287 days). The majority of patients (88%) attributed initial delay in seeking care to "not feeling sick enough." Total delay, total cost and number of health care visits were not associated with treatment or clinical outcomes, though our study was not adequately powered for these determinations. Despite the public availability of rapid molecular TB tests, patients experienced significant delays and high costs in accessing RR-TB treatment. Active case finding, integration of private health care providers and enhanced service delivery may reduce treatment delay and TB associated costs.

Data quality assessment of a South African electronic registry for drug-resistant TB, 2015-2016.

Assessment of bedaquiline roll-out in South Africa requires accurate patient data in EDRWeb, a national case-based rifampicin-resistant TB (RR-TB) surveillance register. To ensure EDRWeb data reflect programmatic DR-TB source data, we implemented a data quality improvement initiative. We conducted data quality assessments of EDRWeb data compared to paper patient folders at two South African RR-TB treatment facilities in 2015 and 2016. We assessed 80 patient records before the intervention for completeness of clinically relevant data fields, and 80 different records after the intervention for completeness and concordance. The intervention involved reviewing and updating EDRWeb along with data quality audits with direct feedback to sites. At baseline data completeness per site was lowest for variables related to electrocardiogram (ECG) data, adverse events, and concomitant medications (completeness for these fields ranged from 0% to 80%). Post-intervention data completeness and concordance were high for all fields except those related to ECG data (ECG-related field completeness ranged from 10% to 100%). After a data quality initiative, data completeness improved at each site with the exception of ECG data fields. Our findings suggest that data quality interventions may improve patient clinical registries, ultimately enabling better evidence-based decision making for TB programmes.