Treatment Of Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis Research Articles

Cost and effectiveness of autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation and high-efficacy disease-modifying therapies in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis

BackgroundAutologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) is a highly effective one-off treatment for relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RR-MS), potentially representing an optimal front-loading strategy for costs.ObjectiveExploring cost/effectiveness of AHSCT and high-efficacy disease-modifying treatments (HE-DMTs) in RR-MS, estimating costs at our centre in Italy, where National Health Service (NHS) provides universal health coverage.MethodsCosts (including drugs, inpatient/outpatient management) for treatment with AHSCT and HE-DMTs were calculated as NHS expenditures over 2- and 5-year periods. Cost-effectiveness for each treatment was estimated as “cost needed to treat” (CNT), i.e. expense to prevent relapses, progression, or disease activity (NEDA) in one patient over n-years, retrieving outcomes from published studies.ResultsCosts of AHSCT and HE-DMTs were similar over 2 years, whereas AHSCT was cheaper than most HE-DMTs over 5 years (€46 600 vs €93 800, respectively). When estimating cost-effectiveness of treatments, over 2 years, mean CNT of HE-DMTs for NEDA was twofold that of AHSCT, whereas it was similar for relapses and disability. Differences in CNT were remarkable over 5 years, especially for NEDA, being mean CNT of HE-DMTs €382 800 vs €74 900 for AHSCT.ConclusionsAHSCT may be highly cost-effective in selected aggressive RR-MS. Besides priceless benefits for treated individuals, cost-savings generated by AHSCT may contribute to improving healthcare assistance at a population level.

Response to Fingolimod in Multiple Sclerosis Patients Is Associated with a Differential Transcriptomic Regulation.

Fingolimod is an immunomodulatory sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) analogue approved for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). The identification of biomarkers of clinical responses to fingolimod is a major necessity in MS to identify optimal responders and avoid the risk of disease progression in non-responders. With this aim, we used RNA sequencing to study the transcriptomic changes induced by fingolimod in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of MS-treated patients and their association with clinical response. Samples were obtained from 10 RRMS patients (five responders and five non-responders) at baseline and at 12 months of fingolimod therapy. Fingolimod exerted a vast impact at the transcriptional level, identifying 7155 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) compared to baseline that affected the regulation of numerous signaling pathways. These DEGs were predominantly immune related, including genes associated with S1P metabolism, cytokines, lymphocyte trafficking, master transcription factors of lymphocyte functions and the NF-kB pathway. Responder and non-responder patients exhibited a differential transcriptomic regulation during treatment, with responders presenting a higher number of DEGs (6405) compared to non-responders (2653). The S1P, NF-kB and TCR signaling pathways were differentially modulated in responder and non-responder patients. These transcriptomic differences offer the potential of being exploited as biomarkers of a clinical response to fingolimod.

Twenty Years of Subcutaneous Interferon-Beta-1a for Multiple Sclerosis: Contemporary Perspectives.

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic, progressive, inflammatory disorder of the central nervous system. Relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), the most common form of the disease, is characterized by transient neurological dysfunction with concurrent accumulation of disability. Over the past three decades, disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) capable of reducing the frequency of relapses and slowing disability worsening have been studied and approved for use in patients with RRMS. The first DMTs were interferon-betas (IFN-βs), which were approved in the 1990s. Among them was IFN-β-1a for subcutaneous (sc) injection (Rebif®), which was approved for the treatment of MS in Europe and Canada in 1998 and in the USA in 2002. Twenty years of clinical data and experience have supported the efficacy and safety of IFN-β-1a sc in the treatment of RRMS, including pivotal trials, real-world data, and extension studies lasting up to 15years past initial treatment. Today, IFN-β-1a sc remains an important therapeutic option in clinical use, especially around pregnancy planning and lactation, and may also be considered for aging patients, in which MS activity declines and long-term immunosuppression associated with some alternative therapies is a concern. In addition, IFN-β-1a sc is used as a comparator in many clinical studies and provides a framework for research into the mechanisms by which MS begins and progresses.

Real-world evidence and patient preference for subcutaneous versus intravenous natalizumab in the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis - initial results from the observational SISTER study.

The consideration of patient preference for a certain drug route of administration (RoA) plays an important role in promoting patient adherence in chronic diseases. Natalizumab is an established treatment for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) and can be administered as intravenous (IV) infusion or subcutaneous (SC) injection developed to enable a shorter and easier administration versus IV RoA. Primary objective is to compare patients' preference for RoA and satisfaction with SC versus IV natalizumab at baseline and subsequent visits up to 12 months. Secondary objectives include drug utilization, clinical outcomes, safety, and treatment satisfaction in a usual care setting. SISTER (Subcutaneous: Non-Interventional Study for Tysabri Patient Preference - Experience from Real World) is an ongoing, prospective, observational study where natalizumab is utilized according to local label. RRMS patients are included in three natalizumab cohorts: Patients switching from current IV to SC administration (switcher) and patients newly starting natalizumab on either SC or IV route (starter SC/IV). This interim analysis includes 262 patients (184 switchers, 39 SC starters, and 39 IV starters), median observation period was 9 months. 80.8% IV starters and 93.9% SC starters reported at baseline that they prefer the assigned RoA. Although initial satisfaction with chosen RoA was maintained over time from baseline through Month 12 in all three cohorts, the wish for change of the current RoA after 6 and 12 months was more frequently expressed among IV starters than in either SC cohort. Consistently, six patients (23.1%) starting with IV changed their RoA from IV to SC route.Mean global treatment satisfaction according to TSQM-II score at baseline remained high in the switcher group and increased through Month 12 in both IV and SC starter cohorts. Based on current data, there is a trend toward patients' preference for the natalizumab SC route over the IV route, which provides valuable insights into patients' preference for natalizumab RoA in routine care and complements available data from clinical studies with real-world data on SC natalizumab. This observational (non-interventional) study was registered in the local German PEI register for non-interventional studies (NIS-No. 611) and in the international CTgov register (NCT05304520).

TAURUS-MS II: real-world use of teriflunomide in Germany and changes in treatment patterns over time.

Teriflunomide is a once-daily oral disease-modifying therapy (DMT) for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Only limited information is available about its real-world use and changes over time. To collect real-world data on teriflunomide use in clinical routine (and comparison to the previously conducted study TAURUS-MS). National, open, non-interventional, prospective, multicenter study. TAURUS-MS II was conducted at 220 German sites between July 2017 and March 2022, including RRMS patients treated with teriflunomide. Data on patient demographics, MS history, previous treatment, therapy satisfaction, and safety were collected. In total, 752 patients were included (65% female) with a mean age (±standard deviation) of 43 ± 11 years. Sixty-six percent had DMT before, and 46% had discontinued their last pretreatment ≤6 months prior to study entry. Among the latter, previous DMTs were interferon (21%), glatiramer acetate (11%), and dimethyl fumarate (9%), and reasons for discontinuation were adverse events (AEs; 55%) and insufficient efficacy (16%). Over 24 months, the mean treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication scores improved by 6 ± 29 points on effectiveness, 8 ± 20 on convenience, and 12 ± 25 on global satisfaction. The mean number of MS relapses decreased from 0.81 ± 0.81 in the 24 months prior to 0.27 ± 0.57 within 24 months after study entry. Non-serious AEs occurred in 423 patients (56%) and serious AEs in 49 patients (7%). Most reported AEs were alanine aminotransferase increase (11%), hypertension (8%), and alopecia (7%). Compared to TAURUS-MS, patients in TAURUS-MS II were younger, had a higher employment rate, and a higher share of treatment-naïve patients. Mean number of relapses was significantly reduced. Patient satisfaction was significantly improved compared to previous DMT. Tolerability was comparable to previous trials. Bundesinstitut für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte public database for non-interventional studies, number 7138.

Safety and persistence of dimethyl fumarate as a treatment for relapsing-remitting multiple-sclerosis

ObjectiveDimethyl fumarate is a medication approved for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the safety and persistence of dimethyl fumarate in clinical practice and analyze the occurrence of lymphopenia is patients treated with dimethyl fumarate over a period of at least 6 months. MethodThis is a retrospective longitudinal observational study carried out between August 2015 and March 2019. The study cohort was made up of patients who had been treated with dimethyl fumarate for at least 6 months. Lymphocyte counts were recorded at different points of time (pre-treatment, at 3, 6, 12 months, and at the end of the study period). The evolution of lymphopenia was evaluated by means of a logistic regression statistical model. An analysis was performed of the relationship between a decreased lymphocyte count over the first 6 months of treatment and the development, by the end of the study, of grade II-III lymphopenia necessitating discontinuation of dimethyl fumarate. Other safety indicators were also evaluated including adverse events and interruptions or discontinuations of treatment. Persistence was determined by measuring the time to discontinuation of treatment. ResultsThe study included a total of 55 patients, of whom 80% were female. The most common adverse events were lymphopenia (27), rubefaction (16), digestive symptoms (11), fatigue (9), headache (3) and sleep disturbances (2). Eleven subjects interrupted/discontinued their treatment during the study period; reasons were as follows: pregnancy (2), personal decision (2), John Cunningham virus infection (1), allergy to the drug (2), and lymphopenia (4). Median duration of treatment was 23 months (4-43 months). A statistically significant association was found between a lower lymphocyte count over the first 6 months of treatment and the development of severe lymphopenia by the end of the study [OR = 1.34 (1.27-11.41); 95% CI (p = 0.001)]. ConclusionsThe adverse events observed in the present study are in line with those reported in previous analyses. Lymphopenia was the most common adverse event. The persistence of the medication was similar to that found in pivotal trials. The significant association found between a decreased lymphocyte count over the first 6 months of treatment and the development of severe lymphopenia by the end of the study suggests a connection between both variables, which could be instrumental in being able to predict and even prevent the occurrence of such lymphopenias.

Rituximab for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in Thailand: an economic evaluation and budget impact analysis

BackgroundMultiple sclerosis is an inflammatory demyelination process in the central nervous system (CNS) causing neurological disability and poor quality of life. Currently, Thai Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved disease-modifying therapy is costly, and most patients with multiple sclerosis are ineligible for treatment in Thailand as previous studies have challenged its cost-effectiveness. Off-label use of rituximab is inexpensive and highly effective in treating multiple sclerosis, but evidence of its cost-effectiveness in Thailand is yet to be collected.MethodsThis study aimed to evaluate the cost-utility and budget impact of rituximab for multiple sclerosis treatment compared with best supportive care, the standard practice in Thailand to treat the disease. A Markov model with a one-month cycle length and lifetime horizon was applied to compare the costs and outcomes of rituximab and best supportive care based on a societal perspective. Accordingly, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were estimated. Probabilistic and one-way sensitivity analyses were conducted to investigate parameter uncertainty. In addition, the Markov model was used to assess the 5-year budget impact from the government perspective.ResultsA rituximab biosimilar demonstrated higher effectiveness and lower associated costs, compared to best supportive care, with the highest probability of being cost-effective (96%). The probability of relapse was the most sensitive parameter according to the one-way sensitivity analysis. The calculated budget impact of treating patients with multiple sclerosis in Thailand was 26,360,000 Thai baht (THB) or 844,255 United States dollars (USD) in the first fiscal year, and approximately 20,810,000–23,080,000 THB (666,608–739,388 USD) in the next four fiscal years.ConclusionIn Thailand, a rituximab biosimilar would reduce the overall costs of multiple sclerosis treatment and should, therefore, be included in the National List of Essential Medicines.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Ponesimod, a Selective S1P1 Receptor Modulator, in the Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis.

Ponesimod, a selective, rapidly reversible, and orally active, sphingosine-1 phosphate receptor (S1P) modulator, is indicated for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). The clinical pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of ponesimod was studied in 16 phase I, one phase II, and one phase III clinical studies. Ponesimod population PK was characterized by an open two-compartment disposition model with a terminal half-life of 33h (accumulation factor of 2- to 2.6-fold), and fast and almost complete oral absorption (absolute oral bioavailability: 84%), reaching peak plasma and blood concentrations within 2-4h. Ponesimod is highly metabolized, and the parent compound along with its two major (non-clinically active) metabolites are mainly excreted in the feces (recovery: 57.3-79.6%) and to a lesser extent in the urine (recovery: 10.3-18.4%). Additionally, the population PKPD model characterized the ponesimod effects on heart rate: a transient, dose-dependent decrease in heart rate in the first days of dosing, that is mitigated by administering the first doses of ponesimod treatment using a gradual up-titration schedule, before reaching the daily maintenance dose of 20mg. This selected maintenance dose has been shown to be superior in reducing annualized relapse rate (ARR) when compared with teriflunomide in a pivotal phase III study. Furthermore, a dose-dependent reduction of peripheral lymphocyte counts that is sustained with continued daily oral dosing of ponesimod and is rapidly (4-7days) reversible upon drug discontinuation has been characterized with an indirect response model.

Haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in Sweden: an observational cohort study

BackgroundA growing evidence base supports the use of autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT) for treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), but it has not yet been integrated into most...

Rituximab in the treatment of multiple sclerosis. Experience of a tertiary care hospital in Mexico.

Multiple sclerosis is a chronic, autoimmune, degenerative disease. Therapies targeting B-cells have been shown to be effective in its treatment; however, there are few studies evaluating their efficacy in the Mexican population. To evaluate the clinical impact of rituximab in patients with newly-diagnosed relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Real life, descriptive study, in which rituximab was evaluated as treatment for RRMS over a 24-month period. Pre- and post-treatment clinical variables were analyzed; a comparison was made between treatment-naïve and non-treatment-naïve patients. Twenty-eight patients with RRMS were included. Mean age at diagnosis was 30.7 years, and 22 patients were treatment-naïve (78.5 %). After 24 months, there was a mean reduction of 1.8 points in the EDSS scale and a decrease in the number of active lesions on magnetic resonance imaging; a significant difference in both variables could be established (p < 0.05). However, the logistic regression model did not show a relationship between the variables for achieving NEDA-3 criteria. No serious adverse events were observed. Treatment with rituximab resulted in significant clinical and radiological improvement in treatment-naïve and non-treatment-naïve Mexican patients with RRMS.

Disease-modifying therapies in multiple sclerosis: A focused review of rituximab.

Treatment for multiple sclerosis (MS), a chronic inflammatory disease of the central nervous system, has changed drastically in the last 30 years. Several different disease-modifying therapies are now available, with off-label use of the B-cell-depleting antibody rituximab becoming an increasingly popular choice, as more and more studies report on its effectiveness. The objective of this study was to summarize the current state of evidence for rituximab as a treatment for relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS). A structured literature search was conducted in PubMed, focusing on peer-reviewed studies of adult populations with RRMS. Ongoing trials with rituximab in MS were identified through Clinicaltrials.gov and additional references were identified through review articles. Despite promising results for rituximab as a treatment of MS, the market-authorization holder switched focus from rituximab and discontinued the industry-sponsored trials programme. However, several observational studies, smaller clinical trials and one large investigator-initiated randomized-controlled trial have continued to report fewer clinical relapses, fewer contrast-enhancing lesions on magnetic resonance imaging and better drug survival with rituximab, compared with MS-approved alternatives. Rituximab should be considered as both a first- and second-line therapy option for most MS patients with active, non-progressive disease. However, as an off-label therapy for MS, regulatory approval remains a barrier for wider adoption in many countries.

Auranofin Modulates Thioredoxin Reductase/Nrf2 Signaling in Peripheral Immune Cells and the CNS in a Mouse Model of Relapsing-Remitting EAE.

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is one of the most prevalent chronic inflammatory autoimmune diseases. It causes the demyelination of neurons and the subsequent degeneration of the central nervous system (CNS). The infiltration of leukocytes of both myeloid and lymphoid origins from the systemic circulation into the CNS triggers autoimmune reactions through the release of multiple mediators. These mediators include oxidants, pro-inflammatory cytokines, and chemokines which ultimately cause the characteristic plaques observed in MS. Thioredoxin reductase (TrxR) and nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) signaling plays a crucial role in the regulation of inflammation by modulating the transcription of antioxidants and the suppression of inflammatory cytokines. The gold compound auranofin (AFN) is known to activate Nrf2 through the inhibition of TrxR; however, the effects of this compound have not been explored in a mouse model of relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS). Therefore, this study explored the influence of AFN on clinical features, TrxR/Nrf2 signaling [heme oxygenase 1 (HO-1), superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD-1)] and oxidative/inflammatory mediators [IL-6, IL-17A, inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), myeloperoxidase (MPO), nitrotyrosine] in peripheral immune cells and the CNS of mice with the RR type of EAE. Our results showed an increase in TrxR activity and a decrease in Nrf2 signaling in SJL/J mice with RR-EAE. The treatment with AFN caused the amelioration of the clinical features of RR-EAE through the elevation of Nrf2 signaling and the subsequent upregulation of the levels of antioxidants as well as the downregulation of oxidative/pro-inflammatory mediators in peripheral immune cells and the CNS. These data suggest that AFN may be beneficial in the treatment of RRMS.

Cost-consequence analysis of ofatumumab for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in Canada.

Aim: The costs and consequences of initial and delayed ofatumumab treatment were evaluated in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis with active disease in Canada. Materials & methods: A Markov cohort model was used (10-year horizon, annual cycle length, 1.5% discounting). Scenario analyses examined ofatumumab as first-line treatment versus 3 and 5years following switch from commonly used first-line therapies. Results: Ofatumumab resulted in improvements in clinical outcomes (relapses and disease progression) and productivity (employment and full-time work), and reduction of economic burden (administration, monitoring and non-drug costs) that were comparable to other high-efficacy therapies (ocrelizumab, cladribine andnatalizumab). Switching to ofatumumab earlier in the disease course may improve these outcomes. Conclusion: Results highlight the value of a high-efficacy therapy such as ofatumumab as initial treatment (i.e., first-line) in newly diagnosed relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients with active disease.

Index of cardiac-electrophysiological balance in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients treated with fingolimod.

Fingolimod is indicated for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) and also targets cardiovascular system due to receptors on cardiomyocytes. Results of previous studies are controversial for the effect of fingolimod in terms of ventricular arrhythmias. Index of cardio-electrophysiological balance (iCEB) is a risk marker for predicting malignant ventricular arrhythmia. There is no evidence on the effect of fingolimod on iCEB in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). The aim of this study was to evaluate iCEB in patients with RRMS treated with fingolimod . A total of 86 patients with RRMS treated with fingolimod were included in the study. All patients underwent a standard 12-lead surface electrocardiogram at initiation of treatment and 6h after treatment. Heart rate, RR interval, QRS duration, QT, QTc (heart rate corrected QT), T wave peak-to-end (Tp-e) interval, Tp-e/QT, Tp-e/QTc, iCEB (QT/QRS) and iCEBc (QTc/QRS) ratios were calculated from the electrocardiogram. QT correction for heart rate was performed using both the Bazett and Fridericia formulas. Pre-treatment and post-treatment values were compared. Heart rate was significantly lower after fingolimod treatment (p< 0.001). While the post-treatment values of RR and QT intervals were significantly longer (p< 0.001) and post-treatment iCEB was higher (median [Q1-Q3], 4.23 [3.95-4.50] vs 4.53 [4.18-5.14]; p< 0.001), it was found that there was no statistically significant change in iCEB and other study parameters derived using QT after correcting for heart rate using both of two formulas. In this study, it was found that fingolimod did not statistically significantly change any of the heart rate-corrected ventricular repolarization parameters, including iCEBc, and it is safe in terms of ventricular arrhythmia.

CSF Concentrations of CXCL13 and sCD27 Before and After Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Multiple Sclerosis.

In the past decade, autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) has emerged as a treatment for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). How this procedure affects biomarkers of B- and T-cell activation is currently unknown. The objective of this study was to investigate CXCL13 and sCD27 concentrations in CSF before and after AHSCT. This prospective cohort study was conducted at a specialized MS clinic in a university hospital. Patients with a diagnosis of RRMS, treated with AHSCT between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2018, were evaluated for participation. Patients were included if CSF samples from baseline plus at least 1 follow-up were available on June 30, 2020. A control group of volunteers without neurologic disease was included as a reference. CSF concentrations of CXCL13 and sCD27 were measured with ELISA. The study comprised 29 women and 16 men with RRMS, aged 19-46 years at baseline, and 15 women and 17 men, aged 18-48 years, in the control group. At baseline, patients had higher CXCL13 and sCD27 concentrations than controls, with a median (IQR) of 4 (4-19) vs 4 (4-4) pg/mL (p < 0.0001) for CXCL13 and 352 (118-530) vs 63 (63-63) pg/mL (p < 0.0001) for sCD27. After AHSCT, the CSF concentrations of CXCL13 were considerably lower at the first follow-up at 1 year than at baseline, with a median (IQR) of 4 (4-4) vs 4 (4-19) pg/mL (p < 0.0001), and then stable throughout follow-up. The CSF concentrations of sCD27 were also lower at 1 year than at baseline, with a median (IQR) of 143 (63-269) vs 354 (114-536) pg/mL (p < 0.0001). Thereafter, sCD27 concentrations continued to decrease and were lower at 2 years than at 1 year, with a median (IQR) of 120 (63-231) vs 183 (63-290) pg/mL (p = 0.017). After AHSCT for RRMS, CSF concentrations of CXCL13 were rapidly normalized, whereas sCD27 decreased gradually over the course of 2 years. Thereafter, the concentrations remained stable throughout follow-up, indicating that AHSCT induced long-lasting biological changes.

HTA80 Cost-Effectiveness of Ocrelizumab Compared with Dmt for the Treatment of Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis in Czech Republic

Ocrelizumab represents a generally well-tolerated, high-efficacy disease-modifying therapy (DMT) approved in Czech Republic for the RRMS. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of ocrelizumab compared with other DMT (glatiramer acetate, interferon beta-1a, interferon beta-1b, teriflunomide) for the treatment of RRMS from payer perspective.

Association of age and inflammatory disease activity in the pivotal natalizumab clinical trials in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis

BackgroundFocal inflammatory disease activity in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) diminishes with increasing age. Here we use patient-level data from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of natalizumab treatment in RRMS to investigate...

Fingolimod mitigates memory loss in a mouse model of Gulf War Illness amid decreasing the activation of microglia, protein kinase R, and NFκB

Gulf War Illness (GWI) is an unrelenting multi-symptom illness with chronic central nervous system and peripheral pathology affecting veterans from the 1991 Gulf War and for which effective treatment is lacking. An increasing number of studies indicate that persistent neuroinflammation is likely the underlying cause of cognitive and mood dysfunction that affects veterans with GWI. We have previously reported that fingolimod, a drug approved for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, decreases neuroinflammation and improves cognition in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. In this study, we investigated the effect of fingolimod treatment on cognition and neuroinflammation in a mouse model of GWI. We exposed C57BL/6 J male mice to GWI-related chemicals pyridostigmine bromide, DEET, and permethrin, and to mild restraint stress for 28 days (GWI mice). Control mice were exposed to the chemicals’ vehicle only. Starting 3 months post-exposure, half of the GWI mice and control mice were orally treated with fingolimod (1 mg/kg/day) for 1 month, and the other half were left untreated. Decreased memory on the Morris water maze test was detected in GWI mice compared to control mice and was reversed by fingolimod treatment. Immunohistochemical analysis of brain sections with antibodies to Iba1 and GFAP revealed that GWI mice had increased microglia activation in the hippocampal dentate gyrus, but no difference in reactive astrocytes was detected. The increased activation of microglia in GWI mice was decreased to the level in control mice by treatment with fingolimod. No effect of fingolimod treatment on gliosis in control mice was detected. To explore the signaling pathways by which decreased memory and increased neuroinflammation in GWI may be protected by fingolimod, we investigated the involvement of the inflammatory signaling pathways of protein kinase R (PKR) in the cerebral cortex of these mice. We found increased phosphorylation of PKR in the brain of GWI mice compared to controls, as well as increased phosphorylation of its most recognized downstream effectors: the α subunit of eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF2α), IκB kinase (IKK), and the p65 subunit of nuclear factor-κB (NFκB-p65). Furthermore, we found that the increased phosphorylation level of these three proteins were suppressed in GWI mice treated with fingolimod. These results suggest that activation of PKR and NFκB signaling may be important for the regulation of cognition and neuroinflammation in the GWI condition and that fingolimod, a drug already approved for human use, may be a potential candidate for the treatment of GWI.

A case of alemtuzumab-induced thyroid disease with a fluctuating course

Alemtuzumab (ALZ) is a humanized monoclonal antibody licensed for the treatment of relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). One of its common side effects is autoimmune thyroid disease, most commonly Graves' disease (GD). Here, we present a case of a 39-year-old female that was on ALZ for the treatment of RRMS. After two cycles, she developed GD, which later converted to severe hypothyroidism.

Final results of the PANGAEA 2.0 study: Treatment benefits of fingolimod for active RRMS patients switching from other DMTs (P6-3.009)

<h3>Objective:</h3> The aim of the PANGAEA 2.0 study was to investigate the efficacy and long-term benefits (3 years) of fingolimod in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients with disease activity switching from other disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). <h3>Background:</h3> In the treatment of RRMS, individualized sequential therapies can be used to optimize the outcome. It is, however, necessary to understand the efficacy and overall impact of sequential switching. <h3>Design/Methods:</h3> The non-interventional, real-world evidence study included 2,579 disease-active RRMS-patients treated with fingolimod at 240 neurological practices and clinics in Germany out of which 966 completed the study. The patients, who were either untreated or treated with an approved DMT other than fingolimod before study start, were observed for 3 years. To obtain insight into the effectiveness of changing to fingolimod, subgroup analyses were based on the patients’ last therapy before switching: oral DMT (oDMT; dimethyl fumarate, teriflunomide), injectable DMT (iDMT; interferons, glatiramer acetate), natalizumab, other DMTs and treatment-naive. <h3>Results:</h3> At baseline, the patient population was mostly female (71.1%) and patients were on average 39.2 (±10.8) years old. The majority of patients had received only 1 treatment prior to study start. In total, 1,138 patients had received an iDMT as last therapy before receiving fingolimod. On average, patients presented with an EDSS of 2.4±1.5 at study start. Over 3 years, the mean EDSS total score remained on a relatively stable level in the subgroups iDMT (EDSS: 2.4±1.6) and oDMT (EDSS: 2.6±1.5). The EDSS increased slightly in the group who was previously on natalizumab treatment (EDSS: 3.3±1.6) along with a slight increase in FSMC. The mean SDMT remained on a stable level in all subgroups. <h3>Conclusions:</h3> PANGAEA 2.0 brings us real-world insights into the effectiveness of fingolimod in disease-active RRMS-patients. The results show that the disease burden remained relatively stable during 3 years on fingolimod, regardless of the previous therapy. <b>Disclosure:</b> Dr. Weiss has received personal compensation for serving as an employee of Novartis Pharma GmbH. Dr. Ziemssen has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for Biogen. Dr. Ziemssen has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for Roche. Dr. Ziemssen has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for Novartis. Dr. Ziemssen has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for BMS Celgene. Dr. Ziemssen has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Merck. Dr. Ziemssen has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Roche. Dr. Ziemssen has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Novartis. Dr. Ziemssen has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Merck. Dr. Ziemssen has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Sanofi. Dr. Ziemssen has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for BMS Celgene. Dr. Ziemssen has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Biogen. Dr. Ziemssen has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for TEVA. The institution of Dr. Ziemssen has received research support from Biogen. The institution of Dr. Ziemssen has received research support from Novartis. The institution of Dr. Ziemssen has received research support from Merck. The institution of Dr. Ziemssen has received research support from Sanofi. The institution of Dr. Ziemssen has received research support from Celgene.