Treatment Of Psoriatic Arthritis Research Articles

Real-World Efficacy and Safety of Apremilast in Belgian Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis: Results from the Prospective Observational APOLO Study.

IntroductionApremilast is approved for the treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Real-world evidence on the efficacy and safety of apremilast in clinical practice is limited. We assessed the use of apremilast in patients with PsA in Belgium clinical practice.MethodsThe multicentre, observational, prospective APOLO study enrolled patients with active PsA initiating apremilast in Belgium between April 2017 and December 2018. Primary outcome was PsA Response Criteria (PsARC) after 6 months of apremilast treatment. Secondary outcomes included PsA Impact of Disease 12 (PsAID12) and Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI). Disease-specific outcomes and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were analysed for patients who received apremilast within 30 days prior to their study inclusion and completed at least 150 days of treatment (reference set [REF]).ResultsOf 107 patients enrolled in the study, 106 received at least one dose of apremilast and 69 were included in the REF. PsARC response was achieved by 43.5% of patients (30/69) in the REF at month 6; mean global and composite scores including 68-joint count for pain/tenderness (68-TJC) and 66-joint count for swelling (66-SJC) improved, and 27% and 42% of patients with 68-TJC and 66-SJC > 0 at baseline had complete joint count resolution, respectively. Mean global and composite PsAID12 and HAQ-DI scores decreased at 6 months, indicating improved quality of life. Apremilast was well tolerated and the reported adverse events were in line with the known safety profile.ConclusionResults from the APOLO study indicate that treatment with apremilast in Belgian clinical practice improves the signs and symptoms of PsA as well as patient quality of life.Clinicaltrials.gov IdentifierNCT03096990.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12325-021-02016-x.

The Role of Interleukin-23 Inhibition in the Treatment of Psoriatic Arthritis

Psoriatic arthritis is a chronic inflammatory autoimmune disease with varied manifestations, including functional limitation and reduced quality of life. Improved understanding of the immunopathogenesis of psoriatic arthritis, particularly the role of the interleukin-23 and interleukin-17 axis, has led to the development of therapeutic targets to alter the natural history of the condition. In this article, we review the role of monoclonal antibodies targeting the p19 subunit of interleukin-23 in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis.

Comprehensive Review Exploring Novel Treatments for Psoriatic Arthritis and Axial Spondyloarthritis from 2016 to 2021

Over the past decade, numerous novel therapies have been approved for use in the seronegative spondyloarthritides, including psoriatic arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis. With large variability seen in the spondyloarthritides with respect to presentation and perhaps pathogenesis, potential therapies continue to be discovered and trialled in the hope of better controlling disease activity. This review details therapies that have emerged for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis from 2016 to 2021. We discuss those that have been approved for use in the USA and those that remain under investigation.

Psoriatic Arthritis: A Comprehensive Update for Dermatologists with Review of Literature.

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA), an inflammatory seronegative spondyloarthropathy is the most common co-morbidity of psoriasis (PsO), in almost 30% of cases. Delayed diagnosis and treatment of PsA may result in irreversible joint damage, significant morbidity, impaired quality of life, and several cardiometabolic and cerebrovascular co-morbidities. Dermatologists are uniquely privileged to be able to diagnose latent PsA at an early stage, as almost 80% of these patients present with pre-existing cutaneous PsO. This review provides a detailed overview of PsA along with its salient clinical features, classification criteria, screening tools, simple physical examination maneuvers, imaging findings, and therapeutic options to acquaint dermatologists and other clinicians with this morbid musculoskeletal disorder. We hope to generate awareness about this condition among dermatologists to enable proactive screening of all PsO patients for early diagnosis, initiation of appropriate treatment, and prompt referral to a rheumatologist; thus, helping to arrest PsA disease progression, irreversible joint damage, and subsequent permanent disability.

Pharmacokinetic boosting to enable a once-daily reduced dose of tofacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis (the PRACTICAL study).

Tofacitinib is a Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitor used for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA), dosed as 5 mg twice daily (BID). It is primarily metabolized by the cytochrome P-3A (CYP3A) enzyme, and therefore, the manufacturer recommends to halve the dose when using CYP3A-inhibiting co-medication. Combining half-dose tofacitinib with a registered CYP3A inhibitor (cobicistat) could reduce costs and improve patient experience. Primary: bioequivalence of tofacitinib 5 mg combined with cobicistat once daily (QD; intervention) to tofacitinib 5 mg BID (control). Secondary: safety, patient preference (7-point Likert scale at study end) and predicted differences in disease activity (DAS28-CRP and probability of ACR20 response) using a validated exposure-response model. Open-label, cross-over pharmacokinetic study. We included patients with RA or PsA, treated with tofacitinib 5 mg BID for ⩾14 days without co-medication affected by CYP3A inhibition. Pharmacokinetic sampling was performed at baseline and after 2-6 weeks of intervention treatment. Bioequivalence was defined as 90% CI of the average tofacitinib concentration (Cavg,ss; intervention to control) falling between 80% and 125%, assessed by non-linear mixed-effects modelling. Between 16 September 2019 and 15 January 2021, 30 patients were included, of whom 25 completed both PK measurements. The tofacitinib Cavg,ss was 85% (90% CI: 75-96%). No serious adverse events occurred. Patient preference was 56% for intervention versus 18% for control. No relevant differences in median predicted disease activity were found (DAS28-CRP: 0.03, 95% CI: -0.16 to 0.22; ACR20: -0.01, -0.07 to 0.05). Due to slightly lower tofacitinib concentrations during intervention treatment, pharmacokinetic bioequivalence could not formally be established. However, pharmacokinetic boosting may be an attractive strategy for cost reduction of tofacitinib because of its safety, similar predicted pharmacodynamics and patient preference. This study was registered on 29 May 2019 in the Netherlands Trial Register (register number: NL7766).

Physiotherapy in Psoriatic Arthritis

Psoriatic arthritis is an inflammatory joint condition. It is a chronic condition that includes pinkish-red plaque formation on the skin, leading to its changes. The purpose of this article is to review the literature on the role of physiotherapy in psoriatic arthritis. We performed a critical systematic review on the role of physiotherapy in psoriatic arthritis. The article selection process was systematic. The inclusion criteria of the review were (1) physiotherapy practice with psoriatic arthritis; (2) physical activity in psoriatic arthritis; and (3) chronic psoriatic arthritis and co-morbidities. The current review included 11 studies that fulfill these inclusion criteria. Evidence demonstrates that there is potential benefit of physiotherapy treatment and rehabilitation in psoriatic arthritis. Patients with psoriatic arthritis have impaired function and quality of life. It may involve co-morbidities such as obesity, musculoskeletal disease, cardiovascular disease, or fibromyalgia, which can be improved by non-pharmacological approach, such as aerobic exercise and cardiorespiratory exercise. Low level laser therapy increases not only self-repair activities of living tissues but also cell membrane permeability and metabolism, and education of patients is also necessary to improve clinical conditions. Hydrotherapy, resistance exercise, cryotherapy, and interferential therapy are also beneficial in psoriatic arthritis.

Choosing the Appropriate Target for the Treatment of Psoriatic Arthritis: TNFα, IL-17, IL-23 or JAK Inhibitors?

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a highly heterogenous disease. Apart from arthritis and psoriasis, other manifestations can also occur, including enthesitis, dactylitis, axial-, nail-, eye- and bowel- involvement. Comorbidities are also frequent in the setting of PsA, with cardiovascular disease and mental-health disorders being the most frequent. The Rheumatologist’s arsenal has many different treatment options for treating PsA. Despite their effectiveness, there are some differences in terms of efficacy and safety that might affect clinician’s decision for one or the other drug. Comparing biologic DMARDs and JAK-inhibitors, one could say that they have similar effectiveness in terms of musculoskeletal manifestations. However, anti-IL-17 and anti-IL-23 drugs seem to be more effective for skin manifestations. In contrast, JAK-inhibitors and etanercept might be less effective for these manifestations. Inflammatory bowel disease and uveitis are non-responsive to etanercept and anti-IL-17 drugs. As regards to comorbidities, data are scarce, but future studies will shed light on possible differential effect of bDMARDs or JAK-inhibitors. Safety is always an important drive for choosing the appropriate treatment. Infections are the most common adverse event of these drugs. Etanercept and anti-IL-17 drugs are safer for patients having latent tuberculosis, while herpes zoster is more common in individuals receiving JAK-inhibitors. Finally, venous thromboembolism risk, should be taken into account when JAK-inhibitors are used. In this review, we comparatively present, as outlined above, the various aspects that could affect the choice of the appropriate bDMARD or JAK-inhibitor for the treatment of a PsA patient.

Drug survival of biologic agents in patients with psoriatic arthritis from a medical center in southern Taiwan

Background: Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory disease involving the skin and/or joints. Till 2016, there were five biologic agents for psoriatic arthritis treatment in Taiwan: etanercept, adalimumab, golimumab, ustekinumab, and secukinumab. Although European guidelines recommend tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) inhibitors as the first-line biologic agents for axial disease of psoriatic arthritis, the drug survival of biologic agents in Asian populations remains unclear. Objectives: We investigated 5-year drug survival of biologic agents in patients with psoriatic arthritis. Methods: We used Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital Research Database to evaluate real-world 5-year drug survival of biologic agents for psoriatic arthritis in a medical center from southern Taiwan. Results: The 5-year drug survival rates of ustekinumab, etanercept, and adalimumab were significantly different. Ustekinumab and etanercept showed higher 5-year survival rates for psoriatic disease than adalimumab. Golimumab and secukinumab had a short follow-up time to obtain a conclusive 5-year survival rate. Conclusion: Considering that TNF-α inhibitors are often the first-line biologic agents for psoriatic arthritis in guidelines in western countries, the finding that ustekinumab is superior to TNF-α inhibitor adalimumab in terms of 5-year survival for psoriatic disease may imply that the therapeutic response of biologic agents may differ between different ethnic groups.

Psoriatic arthritis among Egyptian patients with psoriasis attending the dermatology clinic: prevalence, comorbidities, and clinical predictors.

ObjectivesEarly diagnosis and treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) help to prevent progressive joint involvement and disabilities. There is a problem in the early diagnosis of PsA worldwide, which may be attributed to the dermatologists missing PsA symptoms and signs and a lack of effective screening tools.Aim of the studyThe current study was designed to assess the prevalence, comorbidities, and clinical predictors associated with the development of PsA in psoriasis patients.Material and methodsA cross-sectional observational study was performed. Screening questionnaires – the Psoriasis Epidemiology Screening Tool (PEST) and Early Arthritis for Psoriatic Patients (EARP) – were applied to 200 psoriasis patients; among them n = 22 (11% of all tested patients) were in developmental age. Those with positive questionnaires were classified as having PsA or not according to the classification for psoriatic arthritis criteria. Body surface area, psoriasis area and severity index, and psoriasis disability index tools were used for assessing psoriasis patients. A full rheumatological and dermatological evaluation were carried out for PsA patients.ResultsThe prevalence of PsA was found to be 30%, with a mean age of 45.48 ±10.79 years. Further, psoriasis preceded the onset of PsA in 46 patients (76.6%), arthritis began before psoriasis in 6 individuals (10%), and both psoriasis and arthritis coincided in 8 (13.3%) patients. Obesity (OR 7.0, 95% CI: 2.61–18.85), nail psoriasis (OR 5.02, 95% CI: 2.02–12.476), and intergluteal cleft site (OR 12.659, 95% CI: 4.302–37.255) were associated with increased risk of PsA. However, classic plaque psoriasis (OR 0.149, 95% CI: 0.051–0.433) and flexure site (OR 0.238, 95% CI: 0.076–0.746) were linked with a decreased risk of PsA development.ConclusionsScreening for PsA in patients with psoriasis revealed a significant number of undiagnosed cases of PsA that should be treated early. Obesity, nail psoriasis, and psoriasis at the intergluteal sites can help predict the PsA development.

Apremilast for the treatment of palmo-plantar non-pustular psoriasis: A real-life single-center retrospective study.

Palmoplantar psoriasis (PP) is a type of psoriasis that involves the skin of the palms and soles and can present as hyperkeratotic, similar to the vulgaris psoriasis of the body. Apremilast, as an oral inhibitor of phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4), is currently approved for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis and for moderate-to-severe psoriasis in adult patients who have not responded or have contraindications or do not tolerate other systemic treatments. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of apremilast in the treatment of non-pustular palmo-plantar psoriasis in a cohort of 12 patients. We found a clinical response of clear/almost clear palmoplantar psoriasis (PPPGA score 0/1) in 83.33% of our patients, at week 16. No significant safety issues were reported and none of our patients had to discontinue the drug.

Artritis Psoriatika

To know the risk factors, pharmacological treatment and prevention of psoriatic arthritis. Psoriatic arthritis is a chronic musculoskeletal disease associated with psoriasis. at least 5% of psoriasis patients develop psoriatic arthritis. Globally, the incidence of PsA reaches 133 per 100,000 patient subjects. The annual incidence of PsA is about 2.7 cases per 100 people diagnosed with psoriasis. In Asia, PsA cases increased from 2000 to 2013 with a prevalence (per 100,000 population) of 11.12 to 37.75. Based on a study at Sanglah Hospital Bali found PsA patients as much as 6.3% of psoriasis patients. PsA patients may have clinical features such as peripheral arthritis, enthesitis, dactylitis, skin, nail, and axial involvement. Risk factors for psoriatic arthritis include obesity, physical trauma, smoking, location of psoriasis in the body, education level and genetic factors. Pharmacological treatment of PsA based on the latest guidelines from EULAR 2019 and ACR recommendations. These two guidelines discuss pharmacological treatment based on the patient's clinical picture. The goal of pharmacological therapy is to improve the patient's quality of life by improving symptomatic complaints and preventing structural damage. As a prevention, PsA maintains an ideal body weight, reduces cigarette consumption, and performs detection as an early detection.

Frequency and Duration of Early Non-serious Adverse Events in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Psoriatic Arthritis Treated with Tofacitinib.

IntroductionTofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). This post hoc analysis assessed frequency or duration of early select non-serious adverse events (AEs; excluding infections), and their impact on treatment discontinuation, in patients with RA or PsA treated with tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily, or placebo.MethodsData were pooled from five phase 3 and one phase 3b/4 studies in patients with moderate-to-severe RA, and two phase 3 studies in patients with active PsA. Select all-causality, non-serious AEs, reported to month 3 (placebo-controlled period), were headache, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and gastric discomfort (including dyspepsia, gastritis, epigastric discomfort, and abdominal discomfort or pain); incidence rates (unique patients with events per 100 patient-years of follow-up), duration of, and discontinuations due to these non-serious AEs were reported.ResultsWe analyzed 3871 and 710 patients with RA and PsA, respectively. Incidence of non-serious AEs to month 3 was generally similar with tofacitinib and placebo. The most frequent non-serious AEs were headache and diarrhea with tofacitinib, and dyspepsia, nausea, and headache with placebo. Most events were mild or moderate in severity, lasting ≤ 4 weeks. Permanent discontinuations due to non-serious AEs were not observed in patients with PsA, and were < 1.0% in patients with RA across treatment groups. The most frequent cause of temporary discontinuation across all groups was gastric discomfort (0.3–0.8%).ConclusionsNon-serious AE incidence was generally similar in patients with RA or PsA receiving tofacitinib or placebo. Most events were mild or moderate and generally resolved within 4 weeks.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT00960440; NCT00847613; NCT00814307; NCT00856544; NCT00853385; NCT01877668; NCT01882439; NCT02187055.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40744-021-00405-w.

The use of guselkumab in psoriatic arthritis: evidence from real clinical practice

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the joints, spine and enthesis from the group of spondyloarthritis that develops in patients with psoriasis. Guselkumab is a biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug, an inhibitor of interleukin 23, which has been shown to be effective in the treatment of plaque psoriasis and PsA.Objective: to evaluate the effectiveness of guselkumab treatment in PsA patients.Patients and methods. The study included 16 patients with PsA. All patients received 100 mg of guselkumab subcutaneously at weeks 0, 4, 12, 20. Disease activity and treatment efficacy were assessed at weeks 0, 12 and 24 using the DAS28, ASDAS, BASDAI, DAPSA activity indices, the index of the extent and severity of psoriasis PASI.Results and discussion. During treatment, patients with PsA showed a pronounced positive dynamics of the indices of disease activity and an improvement in the skin condition. Before the treatment with guselkumab, the mean value of the DAS28 index was 4.26±0.64, DAPSA – 37.94±9.45, ASDAS – 2.7±0.65, and BASDAI – 5.49±1.39, after 12 weeks of treatment these indicators decreased to 3.03±0.49; 17.06±4.58; 1.64±0.33 and 3.48±0.66, respectively, and after 24 weeks (after the 4th injection) – to 2.32±0.18; 11.31±2.18; 1.22±0.27 and 2.62±0.78, respectively (p&lt;0.05 for all cases). Before treatment, the average PASI index reached 30.99±15.43, after 12 weeks – 4.55±4.82, and after 24 weeks – 1.05±1.46 (p&lt;0.05). During treatment, a significant improvement in the main manifestations of the disease was noted: regression of peripheral arthritis, spondylitis, and skin rashes.The treatment was well tolerated during the 24 weeks of the study, and no serious adverse events were reported.Conclusion. The data from real clinical practice indicate that guselkumab is highly effective and safe in the treatment of PsA.

Ixekizumab for Psoriatic Arthritis: Safety, Efficacy, and Patient Selection.

ObjectiveIxekizumab is a monoclonal antibody targeting IL-17A and licensed for psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and axial spondyloarthritis. Review objectives were to summarize: 1) ixekizumab safety in people with PsA, 2) ixekizumab efficacy from Phase III randomized controlled trials, and 3) ixekizumab study participant PsA phenotypes.MethodsWe conducted a search in PubMed limited to phase III randomized controlled trials (RCT) and corresponding long-term extension studies where the intervention was treatment with ixekizumab in a population with PsA.ResultsWe identified 17 publications and 13 met inclusion criteria. Injection site reactions (ISR) and allergic reactions occurred in up to 25.3% and 6.2% with ixekizumab and 4.5% and 1.85, respectively, with placebo. ISR occurred in 9.5–10.6% at 24 and 52 weeks with ixekizumab versus 3.2–3.5% with adalimumab (p < 0.01) in biologic-naïve PsA. Serious adverse events at 24 weeks occurred in 8.5% with adalimumab versus 3.5% with ixekizumab (p = 0.02), and at 52 weeks in 12.45 with adalimumab and 4.25 with ixekizumab (p < 0.01). Ixekizumab had similar efficacy to adalimumab across all PsA musculoskeletal, symptom and patient-reported outcome domains and surpassed adalimumab in psoriasis outcomes as well as all combined musculoskeletal and psoriasis outcomes. The study subject population was overwhelmingly white, balanced men-women, BMI at the obese threshold, had on average 7-year PsA duration and 15-year psoriasis duration. Disease activity was high with 7/66 swollen joints, 13/68 tender joints, 55% enthesitis, variable dactylitis (12–51%), and active psoriasis in >92%.ConclusionIxekizumab treatment in PsA was associated with a statistically significant higher risk of injection site reactions versus placebo or adalimumab. Ixekizumab had statistically significantly fewer serious adverse events than adalimumab. Ixekizumab demonstrated efficacy for all PsA disease activity domains as well as for slowing radiographic disease progression. The main shortcoming of the ixekizumab PsA program is lack of representation of African American study participants.

Phosphodiesterase-4 Inhibition Reduces Cutaneous Inflammation and IL-1β Expression in a Psoriasiform Mouse Model but Does Not Inhibit Inflammasome Activation.

Apremilast (Otezla®) is an oral small molecule phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitor approved for the treatment of psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, and oral ulcers associated with Behçet’s disease. While PDE4 inhibition overall is mechanistically understood, the effect of apremilast on the innate immune response, particularly inflammasome activation, remains unknown. Here, we assessed the effect of apremilast in a psoriasis mouse model and primary human cells. Psoriatic lesion development in vivo was studied in K5.Stat3C transgenic mice treated with apremilast for 2 weeks, resulting in a moderate (2 mg/kg/day) to significant (6 mg/kg/day) resolution of inflamed plaques after 2-week treatment. Concomitantly, epidermal thickness dramatically decreased, the cutaneous immune cell infiltrate was reduced, and proinflammatory cytokines were significantly downregulated. Additionally, apremilast significantly inhibited lipopolysaccharide- or anti-CD3-induced expression of proinflammatory cytokines in peripheral mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Notably, inflammasome activation and secretion of IL-1β were not inhibited by apremilast in PBMCs and in human primary keratinocytes. Collectively, apremilast effectively alleviated the psoriatic phenotype of K5.Stat3 transgenic mice, further substantiating PDE4 inhibitor-efficiency in targeting key clinical, histopathological and inflammatory features of psoriasis. Despite lacking direct effect on inflammasome activation, reduced priming of inflammasome components upon apremilast treatment reflected the indirect benefit of PDE4 inhibition in reducing inflammation.

Combination of denosumab and biologic DMARDs in inflammatory muscle-skeletal diseases and connective tissue diseases.

Osteoporosis (OP) can complicate the course of rheumatic musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) and connective tissue diseases (CTDs). Denosumab, a monoclonal antibody against RANK-L, showed beneficial effect in rheumatoid arthritis in inhibiting radiographic progression and erosive burden. We tested the efficacy, safety, and persistence on the treatment of the combination of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs)/denosumab versus bDMARD in patients with RMD and CTD. This is a retrospective evaluation of a single center, including patients with RMD/CTD (including rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, systemic sclerosis, and overlap syndromes) treatment with bDMARD/denosumab, compared to age, gender, disease, bDMARD, and conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs-matched controls. Twenty-eight bDMARD/denosumab patients and 49 bDMARD patients were eligible. Despite a statistically significant difference during the first-year efficacy (due to the different baseline timepoint), there was no difference in the efficacy profile in the second year of treatment and in the safety profile (including local, systemic, and serious adverse events). Moreover, no statistically significant difference in the persistence of bDMARD treatment over 2 years of evaluation was found. The combination of bDMARD and denosumab was not an independent predictor of disease flare or bDMARD treatment withdrawal. The combination of bDMARD and denosumab does not alter the efficacy and the safety profile of the bDMARD in patients with RMD/CTD. Future studies verifying the radiological disease inhibition could support denosumab use in RMD/CTD other than rheumatoid arthritis, when complicated by OP.

Long-term efficacy and safety of apremilast in the treatment of plaques psoriasis: A real-world, single-center experience.

Apremilast is a small molecule approved for the treatment of plaques psoriasis and adult psoriatic arthritis. Pivotal studies have demonstrated short and long term efficacy and safety of apremilast but few data in real life are still available. The aim of this study is to report the efficacy and safety results of apremilast in clinical practice in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, focusing on therapeutic results obtained after 24 and 52 weeks of treatment. From May 2018 to December 2018, 40 patients with plaques psoriasis have been enrolled. Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI), body surface area, Physician Global Assessment, and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) were performed at baseline at 24 (W24) and 52 (W52) weeks after treatment initiation. Primary endpoint was to evaluate the percentage of patient that achieved PASI 75, PASI 90 and PASI 100 at week 24 and 52 of treatment. Additional measure of efficacy was percentage of patients reaching the minimal disease activity (MDA=PGA0/1 and DLQI 0/1) after 24 and 52 weeks of treatment. As secondary endpoint, we evaluated the percentage of patient that achieved DLQI 0-1 at W24 and W52, and long-term safety of apremilast. The percentage of patients who achieved PASI75, PASI90 and PASI100 was 47.5%, 30% and 10% and 25%, 35% and 10% at W24 and W52 respectively. About the half of the reported patients reached MDA at W24 (n=21) and at W52 (n=20). The 60% of patients achieved and maintained DLQI 0-1 at W24 until W52. Diarrhea, nausea, headache, insomnia, and other AEs have been reported by 28 patients. Apremilast in real life experience confirmed the levels of efficacy and safety obtained in pivotal trials. In particular, the good initial response to the treatment is predictive of the maintenance or improvement of the outcome over W52. The efficacy is supported by an excellent safety profile even in frail patients.

Relative efficacy and safety of Janus kinase inhibitors for the treatment of active psoriatic arthritis: anetwork meta-analysis.

To determine the relative effectiveness and safety of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors in active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients. ABayesian network meta-analysis was performed using data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of upadacitinib 30 mg, upadacitinib 15 mg, tofacitinib 10 mg, tofacitinib 5 mg, and filgotinib 200 mg in active PsA patients. Five RCTs including 2539patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve(SUCRA) revealed that filgotinib 200 mg had the highest probability of reaching a20% American College of Rheumatology (ACR20) response rate, followed by upadacitinib 30 mg, upadacitinib 15 mg, tofacitinib 10 mg, tofacitinib 5 mg, and placebo. Upadacitinib 30 mg had the highest probability of achieving the ACR50 and ACR70 response rates, followed by upadacitinib 15 mg, filgotinib 200 mg, tofacitinib 10 mg, tofacitinib 5 mg, and placebo. The SUCRA rating based on the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index response rate of at least 75%(PASI75) showed that tofacitinib 10 mg had the highest probability of achieving this response, followed by upadacitinib 15 mg, filgotinib 200 mg, tofacitinib 5 mg, and placebo. Safety analyses evaluated adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs), but no statistically relevant differences were found. Based on the ACR response rates, filgotinib 200 mg and upadacitinib 30 mg were the most effective, whereas tofacitinib 10 mg was the most effective treatment for PsA based on PASI75. However, treatment options were similar with regard to AEs and SAEs.

A cost-consequence analysis of the preferential use of secukinumab versus adalimumab for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis

ObjectivesTo assess the efficiency of secukinumab compared to adalimumab as first biologic treatment for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) from the Spanish National Health System (SNHS) perspective. MethodsA cost-consequence analysis of the cost and clinical response of two treatment strategies was conducted over a 2-year time horizon. A hypothetical cohort of 10 patients with PsA initiated treatment with secukinumab 150mg (cohort A) or adalimumab 40mg (cohort B), respectively. Patients achieving clinical response (ACR20/50/70) at week 24 continued the initial treatment, while patients with inadequate response switched to secukinumab 300mg. Pharmacological costs were calculated based on SmPC (notified ex-factory price). The lowest cost of adalimumab biosimilar was considered. Data on clinical response were extracted from the two matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) published comparing secukinumab vs adalimumab. Results were expressed as the cost difference between the two cohorts (€, 2019) and were calculated for each clinical response criteria (ACR20/50/70) and for each MAIC. Sensitivity analysis assessed the impact of potential discounts on the cost of adalimumab while maintaining the cost of secukinumab unchanged. ResultsDepending on the MAIC used, the cost of initiating biologic treatment for PsA with secukinumab 150mg was 18–33% lower than the one estimated for adalimumab 40mg, for ACR20, 18–28% for ACR50, and 16–23% for ACR70 response rate. Sensitivity analysis showed that it would be necessary a discount of 40–60%, 40–65% and 50–75% over the adalimumab cost to compensate for the differences in efficacy observed for ACR20/50/70, respectively, depending on the MAIC used. ConclusionIn patients with PsA, secukinumab could be considered a more efficient first-line biologic treatment compared to adalimumab, from the SNHS perspective.

Evolution of Patient Perceptions of Psoriatic Disease: Results from the Understanding Psoriatic Disease Leveraging Insights for Treatment (UPLIFT) Survey.

IntroductionSince the 2012 Multinational Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (MAPP) survey, several systemic treatments for psoriasis (PsO) and/or psoriatic arthritis (PsA) have been approved. The population-based UPLIFT survey was conducted to understand how perceptions of treatment-related outcomes have evolved, particularly for patients with mild to moderate PsO and/or PsA and their dermatologists.MethodsThis population- and web-based survey was conducted from 2 March to 3 June 2020, in North America, Europe, and Japan. Adults with self-reported healthcare practitioner (HCP)-diagnosed PsO and/or PsA and dermatologists who spent > 50% of time treating patients and treated ≥ 20 patients with PsO, including plaque PsO, per month were included. Patient participants were recruited at random from online panels; dermatologists were recruited randomly from representative physician panels.ResultsOf 264,054 patient responses, 3806 who self-reported an HCP diagnosis of PsO and/or PsA were included in the final sample; 67% had PsO alone, 28% had PsO and PsA, and 5% had PsA alone. The estimated population prevalence of psoriatic disease was 7% (PsO only: 4%; PsO and PsA: 2%; PsA only: 1%). Most patients (78%) reported PsO-involved body surface area (BSA) ≤ 3 palms, and ~ 90% or more reported itching, redness, flaking, and scales. Many PsO patients without diagnosed PsA reported musculoskeletal symptoms suggestive of PsA (63%). Across BSA categories, approximately one in four patients was not currently receiving treatment and > 50% had Dermatology Life Quality Index score > 5. Patients and dermatologists had different perceptions of PsO severity, office visit discussions, treatment goals, and treatment satisfaction. The survey was conducted during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, which could have affected assessments of patient-reported outcomes and ability to have in-person HCP visits.ConclusionsPatients with PsO and PsA in UPLIFT reported high disease burden, including patients with limited skin involvement. An opportunity exists to align patient and dermatologist perceptions to optimize management of PsO and PsA.Infographic Digital featureThis article is published with digital features, including an infographic, to facilitate understanding of the article. To view digital features for this article go to 10.6084/m9.figshare.17104586.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13555-021-00635-4.