Treatment Of Hypertension In Patients Research Articles

Management of arterial hypertension in patients with peripheral arterial disease.

Hypertension is a major risk factor for peripheral arterial atherosclerotic disease (PAD). Hypertension deteriorates arterial wall function and the morphology of all layers of arteries. Endothelial cell injury enhances permeability and promotes migration of cholesterol and monocytes into the vessel wall. Increased blood pressure (BP) through hyperplasia of smooth muscle cells initiates remodeling of the arterial wall that increases peripheral resistance. Further, hypertension, particularly in patients with dyslipidemia, provokes atherosclerosis in different vascular territories, including the lower legs. Guidelines recommend treatment of hypertension in patients with PAD to reach the target BP of <130/80 mmHg. However, systolic BP (SBP) <120 mmHg may worsen oxygen delivery to the diseased leg and is related to a higher rate of cardiovascular (CV) events. Therefore, there is a J-shape relationship between SBP and the rate of primary outcomes. Any class of antihypertensive drugs, including beta-blockers, can be used for the treatment of hypertension in patients with PAD. Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors may have some additional benefit over other antihypertensive drugs including improvement of perfusion of the diseased leg and are recommended even in patients with critical limb ischemia. In conclusion: hypertensive patients with PAD are at increased risk for CV events and treatment of raised BP is indicated, but SBP <120 mmHg and DBP <70 mmHg may contribute to adverse limb outcomes and other CV events. Consequently, PAD patients may require a different BP target than those without PAD.

Antihypertensive therapy in patients with arterial hypertension and concomitant diseases in real clinical practice (according to the National Registry of Arterial Hypertension, 2019-2022)

Arterial hypertension (AH) remains the leading risk factor associated with cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), cerebrovascular disease and chronic kidney disease. About 70% of patients with AH who are on monotherapy cannot achieve blood pressure (BP) targets, and therefore all quidelines for the management of AH have recently recommended prescribing combination therapy (PCT). In real clinical practice (RCP), there remains significant uncertainty in the effectiveness and rationality of therapy, despite the wide availability of antihypertensive drugs (AHD) and the presence of recommendations for a stepwise approach to prescribing combinations of specific groups of AHD in different clinical situations. Analyze the real ongoing antihypertensive therapy, including the PCT; international nonproprietary names of drugs and their dosages in RCP; compliance of therapy with clinical recommendations; changing trends in the PCT. An analysis was carried out of the data from the register of AH, the compliance of treatment in different clinical groups of patients and the achievement of BP and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol targets in the sample of 2019-2022 (n=5012). The prescription of AHD and achievement of targets values were assessed in accordance with current clinical guidelines for the management of AH and hypercholesterolemia. Data from 2010 (n=7782) and 2020 (n=3061) were analyzed to assess the dynamics of prescription of monotherapy and PCT. The greatest increase in the number of AHD was observed in patients with hypertension in combination with coronary heart disease, heart failure, and atrial fibrillation. In a small group of patients with hypertension without other CVDs, the recommended combinations of AHD were not prescribed; preference was given to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, and β-adrenoblocker (β-AB). PCT mainly differed from the recommended combinations by the wider use of drugs from the β-AB group. The PCT of recommended drugs was highest in patients with hypertension and coronary artery disease - more than 90%, hypertension and heart failure in 56.2%, hypertension and atrial fibrillation - 33.3%, hypertension and chronic kidney desease - 19.6%. Achievement of BP and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol targets was insufficient in all analyzed groups. Among the international nonproprietary names of drugs, the most frequently prescribed are the following: bisoprolol, metoprolol, lisinopril, perindopril, losartan, spironolactone, amlodipine, torasemide, indapamide, hypochlorothiazide, moxonidine. The prescribed daily dosages were closer to the initial recommended ones. By 2020, the prescription of PCT with β-AB and a more uniform prescription of various combinations will come to the fore, while PCT in 2010 is characterized by the presence of one or two leaders combinations. The described features of prescribing AHD partially reproduce clinical recommendations for the management of AH. Differences in therapy provided in RCP may be associated with an attempt to intensify the treatment of hypertension in patients with other concomitant CVDs. At the same time, analysis of combinations and dosages of prescribed drugs suggests the presence of wide opportunities for further escalation of therapy. The presented data can provide insight into current patterns of antihypertensive therapy prescription in patients in RCP and lay the foundation for optimizing therapy in different categories hypertensive patients.

Emergency Department and Critical Care Use of Clevidipine for Treatment of Hypertension in Patients with Acute Stroke.

Clevidipine is a parenteral dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker that received Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval in 2008 for the reduction of blood pressure (BP) when oral therapy is not feasible or not desirable. Soon after approval, our institution incorporated clevidipine into protocols for management of hypertension among acute stroke patients, based on the drug's rapid onset of action and straightforward titration to goal. A subsequent retrospective review of its use in otherwise alteplase-eligible ischemic stroke patients with BP greater than 185/110 mmHg (n=32, in 2014) revealed that clevidipine in that setting demonstrated the shortest median time to BP control, the shortest median door to alteplase administration time, and the lowest administered volume of any parenteral antihypertensive used. As a result, clinical protocols in our institution were modified to make clevidipine first-line antihypertensive in both ischemic and hemorrhagic acute stroke. In this study we report our institution's experience with clevidipine in acute stroke, comprising the largest such report to date. . We conducted a retrospective chart review of all acute stroke patients who received clevidipine in the Emergency Department (ED) or intensive care unit (ICU) (n=295) for the management of clinically significant hypertension between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2017. Metrics analyzed included target (goal) BP for thrombolysis eligibility among patients intended for lytic therapy according to stroke management guidelines in effect at the time of care. The median time for initial parenteral antihypertensive Dose-to-Goal (DTG) BP for all ischemic stroke patients (both those intended for and those not intended for lytic therapy) with complete data (n= 71 of 204) was 15 minutes; median time for Door-to-IV-alteplase administration for ischemic stroke patients with complete data (n=14 of 34 treated patients) was 59 minutes. The median time for initial parenteral antihypertensive DTG BP for all hemorrhagic stroke patients with complete data (n=33 of 91 treated patients) was 39 minutes. We conclude that the salutary findings of the initial small study are valid across a larger patient sample of all acute stroke types. Based on these data, clevidipine is shown to be safe, consistent, and effective in the treatment of acute hypertension in ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke events, and is a reasonable first-line treatment option for acute hypertension in this setting.

Hidden barriers: obesity bias in hypertension treatment.

Individuals with obesity often face obesity bias, which may influence the delivery of appropriate medical care. Our aim is to evaluate the adequacy of therapeutic decisions regarding the pharmacological treatment for hypertension in patients with diabetes, both with and without obesity. This is a multicentric cross-sectional study of patients with type 2 diabetes and arterial hypertension who received outpatient care in Southern Brazil. Participants were stratified into two groups according to their body mass index (BMI): lower weight (BMI < 25.0 kg/m2) and with obesity (BMI ≥ 30.0 kg/m2). The primary outcome evaluated was the difference in pharmacological treatment decisions for hypertension between groups, considering individualized hypertension targets from American Diabetes Association (ADA), European Society of Hypertension (ESH), and European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines. Data were analyzed as a binary endpoint (failure to receive treatment intensification vs. receiving treatment intensification when necessary) and groups were compared using multivariable logistic regression. This study included 204 participants, of which 53 were at a lower weight and 151 had obesity. Patients with obesity more frequently failed to receive appropriate treatment intensification when compared to individuals with lower weight. The differences between the study groups were observed when considering the blood pressure target of three societies: ESH (adjusted OR 2.28 [95% CI 1.12-4.63], p = 0.022), ESC (adjusted OR 2.13 [95% CI 1.05-4.31], p = 0.035), and ADA (adjusted OR 2.33 [95% CI 1.13-4.77], p = 0.021). These findings suggest that patients with obesity may face potential disparities in hypertension management, and obesity status may be related to therapeutic inertia in the management of arterial hypertension in this group.

Association of Knowledge and Practice of Home Blood Pressure Monitoring (HBPM) Among Second-Year Medical Students

Objective: Hypertension is a global public health challenge, often exhibiting suboptimal management resulting in numerous health complications. Home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) is a valuable tool for aiding healthcare providers in the diagnosis and treatment of hypertension in patients. Approximately 15% of individuals with hypertension fall within the young adult demographic, ranging from 18 to 39 years old. The early onset of hypertension exposes them to a heightened risk of cardiovascular events occurring prematurely. Consequently, the objective of this research is to assess the association of knowledge of HBPM with practice among medical students. Methods: This was part of a larger study entitled: “Effect of Video Intervention on Knowledge of Proper Home Blood Pressure Monitoring Among Second Year Medical Students, UPM”. It was a cross sectional study done among all second-year medical students in the Universiti Putra Malaysia from April 2022 to 2023 (JKEUPM-2022-143). The students were given online questionnaires on HBPM. The questionnaire underwent content validation by a panel of experts. It consisted of 20 questions on knowledge, with one point for each correct answer. A higher score indicates better knowledge. There were two questions on practice which asked if they did HBPM on themselves or their family members/friends. Results: We report (n=21, 24.1%) of participants do their blood pressure at home, while (n=45,51.7%) do BP monitoring at home to their family members/friends. The mean (+sd) knowledge scores out of a possible 20 for these groups are 10.81 (+ 3.0) and 11.29 (+2.5) respectively. Those who assisted family members/friends with their BP at home had significantly more knowledge scores that those who didn’t (mean difference= 2.7, p=0.000). No significant associations with the group with self BP monitoring. Conclusion: Therefore, we conclude that those who assist others in HBPM have significantly higher knowledge scores compared to those who did not.International Journal of Human and Health Sciences Supplementary Issue 01: 2024 Page: S50

АРТЕРИАЛЬНАЯ ГИПЕРТЕНЗИЯ У ПАЦИЕНТОВ СТАРШИХ ВОЗРАСТНЫХ ГРУПП: КЛИНИКО-ПАТОГЕНЕТИЧЕСКИЕ ОСОБЕННОСТИ, ВЫБОР ОПТИМАЛЬНОЙ ГИПОТЕНЗИВНОЙ ТЕРАПИИ

Arterial hypertension is one of the main risk factors for the development of complications of diseases of the cardiovascular system, the prevalence of which increases with age. The mechanisms of increasing blood pressure in old age are different, the most significant of them is an increase in the stiffness of the artery wall. Isolated systolic arterial hypertension holds a distinct place in elderly and senile patients. The treatment of hypertension in patients of older age groups is much more difficult than in young and middleaged patients, due to the more frequent development of side effects of antihypertensive therapy, as well as the lack of sufficient studies conducted in this category of patients.

Hypertension treatment for patients receiving ibrutinib: a multicenter retrospective study

AbstractAlthough Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKis) are generally well tolerated and less toxic than chemotherapy alternatives used to treat lymphoid malignancies, BTKis like ibrutinib have the potential to cause new or worsening hypertension (HTN). Little is known about the optimal treatment of BTKi-associated HTN. Randomly selected patients with lymphoid malignancies on a BTKi and antihypertensive drug(s) and with at least 3 months of follow-up data were sorted into 2 groups: those diagnosed with HTN before BTKi initiation (prior-HTN), and those diagnosed with HTN after BTKi initiation (de novo HTN). Generalized estimating equations assessed associations between time varying mean arterial pressures (MAPs) and individual anti-HTN drug categories. Of 196 patients included in the study, 118 had prior-HTN, and 78 developed de novo HTN. Statistically significant mean MAP reductions were observed in patients with prior-HTN who took β blockers (BBs) with hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ), (−5.05 mmHg; 95% confidence interval [CI], 10.0 to −0.0596; P = .047), and patients diagnosed with de novo HTN who took either an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) with HCTZ (−5.47 mmHg; 95% CI, 10.9 to −0.001; P = .05). These regimens also correlated with the greatest percentages of normotensive MAPs. Treatment of HTN in patients taking a BTKi is challenging and may require multiple antihypertensives. Patients with prior-HTN appear to benefit from combination regimens with BBs and HCTZ, whereas patients with de novo HTN appear to benefit from ACEi/ARBs with HCTZ. These results should be confirmed in prospective studies.

Clinical pharmacy services in cancer patients with hypertension

Abstract Clinical pharmacy services aim to ensure the rational use of drugs and resolve disease/health conditions with a multidisciplinary approach. Pharmaceutical care plans need to be created to effectively provide clinical pharmacy services in the treatment of hypertension which is one of the common chronic diseases in cancer patients. In this mini-review, we examine which drugs can cause or worsen hypertension in patients receiving cancer treatment, potential drug-drug interactions between drugs used in cancer treatment and antihypertensive drugs, pharmacological and clinical studies for the treatment of hypertension in patients with hypertension before cancer diagnosis or newly diagnosed hypertension due to cancer treatment. Non-pharmacological treatment approaches are presented. We think that our study will be a resource that can be used to solve possible drug-related problems in the practice.

Development and validation of HPLC method for simultaneous determination of amlodipine besylate, telmisartan and hydrochlorothiazide in combined tablets

A combination of three active ingredients amlodipine besylate, telmisartan and hydrochlorothiazide has been used and proven effective in the treatment of hypertension in patients with moderate to severe hypertension, while it contributes to a reduction in product costs and increases patient compliance. However, there are no monographs in pharmacopoeias for the simultaneous quantification of these three active ingredients. Therefore, in order to contribute to the establishment of an in-house specification for domestic generic drugs, shorten the time of quantifying each ingredient separately, the study was carried out with the aim of developing and validating procedure for the simultaneous quantification of amlodipine besylate, telmisartan and hydrochlorothiazide by high performance liquid chromatography. In this study, we conducted investigation into different chromatographic conditions, developed an analytical procedure for the simultaneous quantification of amlodipine besylate, telmisartan and hydrochlorothiazide in tablets preparation. The procedure was validated in compliance with ICH guidelines. Suitable chromatographic conditions for simultaneous quantification of amlodipine besylate, telmisartan and hydrochlorothiazide are: Xterra C18 column (250 x 4.6 mm, 5 μm), detection wavelength 230 nm, gradient program of mobile phase: acetonitrile and phosphate buffer pH 3.0, flow rate 1.0 ml/min, sample injection volume 10 μl, column temperature 30°C. The procedure was validated for systematic suitability, accuracy, specificity, linearity, precision, working range and robustness. A procedure for the simultaneous quantification of amlodipine besylate, telmisartan and hydrochlorothiazide in tablets by high performance liquid chromatography has been successfully developed and validated.

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors, farnesoid X receptor, and dual modulating drugs in hypertension.

Hypertension characterized by an elevated blood pressure is a cardiovascular disease that afflicts greater than one in every three adults worldwide. Nuclear receptors are large superfamily of DNA-binding transcription factors that target genes to regulate metabolic and cardiovascular function. Drugs have been developed for nuclear receptors such as peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARα and PPARγ) and farnesoid X receptor (FXR). PPARα, PPARγ, and FXR agonists are used clinically to treat lipid disorders and metabolic diseases. Evidence from clinical studies and animal hypertension models have demonstrated that PPARα, PPARγ, and FXR agonism can lower blood pressure and decrease end organ damage which could be useful for the treatment of hypertension in patients with metabolic diseases. Unfortunately, PPAR and FXR agonists have unwanted clinical side effects. There have been recent developments to limit side effects for PPAR and FXR agonists. Combining PPAR and FXR agonism with soluble epoxide hydrolase (sEH) inhibition or Takeda G protein receptor 5 (TGR5) agonism has been demonstrated in preclinical studies to have actions that would decrease clinical side effects. In addition, these dual modulating drugs have been demonstrated in preclinical studies to have blood pressure lowering, anti-fibrotic, and anti-inflammatory actions. There is now an opportunity to thoroughly test these novel dual modulators in animal models of hypertension associated with metabolic diseases. In particular, these newly developed dual modulating PPAR and FXR drugs could be beneficial for the treatment of metabolic diseases, organ fibrosis, and hypertension.

PRESCRIPTION OF SINGLE-PILL ANTIHYPERTENSIVE COMBINATION THERAPY

Objective: The need for polytherapy is common among people affected by arterial hypertension (AH). A single-pill combination is a response to decreased medication adherence, especially in elderly people often suffering from more than one disease, which tends to improve blood pressure control and cardiovascular outcomes. The aim of our study was to determine the frequency of use of a single-pill antihypertensive combination (SPC) therapy and possible differences in presence of comorbidities. Design and method: 324 hypertensive participants on pharmacological treatment were included in this research, of which 51.2% were men, and with an overall median age of 64 years (IQR = 17). For each participant undergoing 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure measurement, data about pharmacological therapy, weight, height and comorbidities such as chronic kidney disease (CKD) and diabetes mellitus (DM) were obtained from their most recent medical records combined with self reports. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated. Results: 148 (45.7%) participants were prescribed a SPC. Participants taking a SPC had lower presence of CKD (23.7% with CKD vs. 76.3% without CKD, p&lt;0.001). No significant difference was found in the presence of DM (p = 0.496). Another interesting finding was more frequent use of SPC therapy among patients with higher BMI (p = 0.029). Conclusions: The results show that less than half of the participants in our study were prescribed an SPC. From this we can conclude that more attention should be paid to educating people about the options for antihypertensive treatment and simplifying therapy regimen. Another point we should highlight is the limited availability of SPCs in the treatment of hypertension in patients suffering from CKD.

Effectiveness of the Combination of Enalapril and Nifedipine for the Treatment of Hypertension versus Empirical Treatment in Primary Care Patients.

Hypertension in Mexico has a prevalence of 32% and is the second most widespread cause of consultation in primary care. Only 40% of patients in treatment have a blood pressure (BP) below 140/90 mmHg. This clinical trial aimed to compare the effectiveness of the combination of enalapril and nifedipine versus the empirical treatment for hypertension in patients with uncontrolled BP in a primary care center in Mexico City. Participants were randomized to treatment with enalapril and nifedipine (combination group) or to continue with the empirical treatment. Outcome variables were BP control, therapeutic adherence, and adverse effects at 6 months of follow-up. At the end of the follow-up period, BP control (64% versus 77%) and therapeutic adherence (53% versus 93%) showed an improvement from the baseline values in the group that received the combination treatment. BP control (51% versus 47%) and therapeutic adherence (64% versus 59%) in the group who received the empirical treatment did not show improvement from the baseline to follow-up. Combined treatment was 31% more efficacious than conventional empirical treatment (odds ratio = 3.9), which yielded an incremental clinical utility of 18% with high tolerability extent among patients in primary care in Mexico City. These results contribute to the control of arterial hypertension.

S-50-6: HOW TO ASSESS BENEFICIAL EFFECTS OF ANTIHYPERTENSIVE TREATMENTS

Most hypertensive patients could have hypertension mediated organ damage (HMOD) at the moment of the diagnosis. Even in low 10-year cardiovascular risk patients HMOD is frequent. The presence of HMOD is related to increased cardiovascular risk and mortality, so, at the same time HMOD should be considered as a therapeutic target and a surrogate marker of blood pressure un/controlled. The effects of impaired renal function and left-ventricular hypertrophy could identify patients at a mortality very high risk. Guidelines considered arterial stiffening evaluated as high carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity a factor influencing cardiovascular risk, and a documented carotid artery stenosis &gt; 50 % as a marker of very high cardiovascular risk. The Shiga Epidemiological Study of Subclinical Atherosclerosis (SESSA) showed that 50% of the participants at risk category one had a mean of one atherosclerotic plaque, and 80.7 % of individuals at category two had a mean of 2.2 atherosclerotic plaques. The hazard ratio of having a vascular event could increase by 50% in the presence of one HMOD and by 3.8 times when three HMOD are present. In this scenario, to prevent that at least some patients could be misclassified as low risk, screening of HMOD as modifiers of cardiovascular risk estimated by different scores could be recommended in hypertensive patients. The non-significant net reclassification improvement of cardiovascular risk and the lack of evidence suggesting a relationship between vascular images biomarkers regression independently of blood pressure lowering and a reduction in cardiovascular events precludes the routine search of arterial stiffness or carotid atherosclerotic plaques out of research scenarios. A reduction in left ventricular mass during treatment is a favorable prognostic marker that predicts lesser risk for subsequent cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The association between left ventricular mass regression and cardiovascular outcomes is independent of baseline left ventricular mass, baseline clinic and ambulatory blood pressure, and degree of blood pressure reduction. Suboptimal blood pressure control is a significant covariate of persistent left ventricular hypertrophy, independent of the number and class of antihypertensive drugs. RAS blockade is recommended as the initial treatment of hypertension in patients with reduced glomerular filtration rate or albuminuria since they are the most effective at reducing progression to end stage kidney disease, but a combination with calcium channel blockers or diuretics is recommended due to the difficulties to achieve the targets with monotherapy.

Management of hypertension across the cardiovascular-renal continuum

A high incidence of cardiovascular risk misclassification and underestimation of high-risk patients prevails among primary care physicians. In addition, it has been observed that treatment goals of hypertension as recommended by guidelines are not followed in the primary healthcare setting. Therefore, there exists a large percentage of the population with uncontrolled hypertension in India. We aimed at developing a framework for the effective management of hypertension and cardiovascular-renal risk in the presence of comorbidities for clinicians/healthcare providers. An online advisory board meeting with eminent cardiologists from across India was conducted to understand their perspectives on the management of hypertension across the cardiovascular-renal continuum. The outcomes of the meeting were summarized following a literature review of cardiorenal disorders, stroke, and heart failure risk in hypertensive patients. Furthermore, optimal treatment of hypertension in patients with a high risk of coronary artery disease, stroke, and chronic kidney disease and the choice of angiotensin receptor blockers in these patients were suggested. The advisory board meeting provided management strategies for patients with hypertension across the cardiovascular-renal continuum considering the increased risk of heart failure and death in the Indian setting.

Specifičnosti u lečenju hipertenzije kod bolesnika sa hroničnim bubrežnim oboljenjem

Today, it is believed that all over the world about 10% of the population has a kidney lesion, most often chronic kidney disease (CKD). Hypertension and diabetes mellitus are the most common causes of chronic kidney damage, and in everyday clinical practice, we often wonder whether hypertension is a consequence of a lesion of the kidney parenchyma and vasculature or is its cause. Patients with CKD have high cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and most often die from CV disease. The specificity of blood pressure treatment in patients with chronic kidney damage is that good control of hypertension not only leads to a reduction of CV risk but also to a slowing of the progression of chronic to terminal renal failure. There is no doubt that the first line of treatment for hypertension in patients with CKD is angiotensinconverting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin-2 receptor blockers (ARB). They are recommended especially for those patients with diabetic nephropathy because, in addition to their antihypertensive effect, they reduce proteinuria, slow down the progression of chronic kidney failure, especially if given in the early stages of CKD, and reduce CV risk. However, for a long time, there have been controversial opinions about whether in the advanced stages of renal failure, when the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is &lt; 30 mL/min/1.73 m2, these drugs should be excluded. According to the latest KDIGO guidelines in 2021, renin-angiotensinaldosterone (RAAS) blockers are the first line in the treatment of proteinuric CKD patients, with and without diabetes mellitus, and in stage 4, with a note that these drugs should be continued in therapy unless there is marked hyperkalemia (potassium &gt; 6 mmol/L), acute kidney damage or decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate &gt; 30%. The most important thing is to individualize the optimal therapy for each patient. In the guidelines for the treatment of hypertension in patients with CKD, there are no clear recommendations for the treatment of unregulated hypertension when target pressures cannot be achieved with RAAS blockade and when there are contraindications for the administration of this group of drugs. The addition of calcium channel blockers, diuretics, and beta blockers is based on expert opinion.

Hypertension treatment in patients with sleep apnea from the European Sleep Apnea Database (ESADA) cohort - towards precision medicine.

We recruited 5,970 hypertensive patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) on current antihypertensive treatment from the European Sleep Apnea Database (ESADA) cohort. The group was subdivided into those receiving monotherapy (n=3,594) and those receiving dual combined therapy (n=2,376). We studied how major OSA confounders like age, gender, and body mass index as well as the degree of sleep apnea modified office systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Beta-blockers alone or in combination with a diuretic were compared with other antihypertensive drug classes. Monotherapy with beta-blocker was associated with lower systolic blood pressure, particularly in non-obese middle-aged males with hypertension. Conversely, the combination of a beta-blocker and a diuretic was associated with lower systolic and diastolic blood pressure in hypertensive patients with moderate-severe OSA. Systolic blood pressure was better controlled in female patients using this combined treatment. Our cross-sectional data suggest that specific clinical characteristics and type of antihypertensive medication influence the degree of blood pressure control in hypertensive OSA patients. Controlled trials are warranted.

A Protocol for Developing Chinese Clinical Practice Guidelines of Hypertension

To improve the standard screening, diagnosis, and treatment of hypertension in patients in China; realize the standardization of clinical practice of hypertension; and improve the prevention and control level of hypertension in China, it is both important and necessary to develop a clinical practice guideline for hypertension according to a recognized methodology. Jointly sponsored by the National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Medical Doctor Association, Hypertension Committee of the Chinese Medical Doctor Association, Chinese Society of Cardiology, and Hypertension Committee of Cross-Straits Medicine Exchange Association, the “Chinese Clinical Practice Guidelines of Hypertension” was proposed. Research Unit of Evidence-Based Evaluation and Guidelines, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Guideline and Standards Research Centre of Chinese Medical Association Publishing House, Lanzhou University Institute of Health Data Science, and Lanzhou University GRADE Center will provide methodological support for the guidelines.

Peripheral arterial disease and hypertension.

Hypertension (HTN) is a well known risk factor for atherosclerosis and peripheral arterial disease (PAD). PAD affects more than 250 million people globally and is associated with worse clinical outcomes. Although multiple studies have been performed to evaluate treatment of HTN in patients with PAD, blood pressure management in this high-risk cohort remains poor. There has been conflicting evidence regarding blood pressure goals in PAD with some recent studies showing adverse outcomes with low blood pressure in this patient population. Current guidelines, however, continue to recommend treatment goals in PAD patients similar to patients without PAD. To date, no single antihypertensive drug class has shown a clear benefit in PAD population over other antihypertensive drug classes. Prospective randomized trials enrolling PAD patients are required that can shed light on optimum blood pressure target and also distinguish between different antihypertensive drugs in terms of reducing adverse outcomes.

Hypertension treatment in the oldest-old: focus group interviews with Swedish general practitioners

Objective This study explored the considerations and experiences of Swedish General Practitioners (GPs) of hypertension treatment in patients 80 years and above. Design Qualitative design with focus group interviews. Data were analysed by qualitative content analysis. Setting Primary health care centres (PHCCs), both rural and urban, in the Region of Västra Götaland, Sweden. Subjects GPs and GP trainees working at PHCCs in 2019 and 2020. Five focus group interviews with 24 physicians were performed. Main outcome measures Considerations and experiences of hypertension treatment in the oldest-old. Results Eighteen GPs and six GP trainees participated in the study. The latent content was formulated in a theme: ‘The physician’s decision-making in the treatment of hypertension in the oldest-old implies the inclusion of both medical and humanistic considerations.’ The manifest content constituted three main categories: ‘The patient characteristics’ included medical condition, behavioural factors and daily life. ‘The physician’s role’ described the GP as a professional and her/his experienced support. ‘The treatment decision’ considered these categories and involved risk-benefit balancing and communication. For the future, the participants proposed better guidelines for the oldest-old multimorbid patients, increased teamwork, continuous cooperation with nurses and better cooperation with hospital physicians. Conclusion Hypertension care for the oldest-old was experienced as complicated by GPs, due to the need of balancing medical and humanistic considerations. The GP’s clinical experience and the received support were of importance when making the treatment decision based on risk-benefit balancing and communication with the patient. Key points GPs experienced the task of caring for the oldest-old patients with hypertension as complicated. Patient factors like multimorbidity, polypharmacy, behavioural factors and the patient’s condition of daily life were identified. Clinical experience and the experienced support at the PHCC were discussed as important for the GPs’ treatment decision. Treatment decisions for the oldest-old patients with hypertension were based on risk-benefit balancing and communication with the patients.

Management of Hypertension in Patients with Diabetes: A Comprehensive Review of the Perceptions and Practices of Health Care Providers in India.

This study evaluated the perception and practices of health care providers (physicians, diabetologists, and endocrinologists) regarding the treatment of hypertension in patients with diabetes in India. Health care providers throughout India who treated patients with diabetes and hypertension were invited to participate in an online survey and periodic 21 virtual meetings. They were questioned about their perception and practices in managing these patients, and strategies to improve blood pressure (BP). The online survey was completed by 2,513 health care providers, and 344 participated in virtual meetings. More than 50% reported that 31-50% of their patients with diabetes also had hypertension. Home BP monitoring was recommended by 88%, and lifestyle modifications were consistently recommended. Choice of antihypertensive treatment varied based on comorbidities, and a renin-angiotensin system blocker plus a calcium channel blocker (CCB) was the most common combination for dual antihypertensive therapy. Suggested strategies to improve BP control included patient awareness/education, lifestyle modifications, better follow-up/monitoring, and optimization of therapy. Indian health care providers were aware of clinical recommendations and practices regarding treatment of patients with diabetes and hypertension, and generally make clinical decisions consistent with current guidelines. Optimization of care for these patients is essential to reduce cardiovascular disease risk and improve patient outcomes.