Treatment Of Diabetic Macular Edema Research Articles

Effects of Topical or Intravitreal Application of Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor on Density of Intestinal Blood Vessels of Mice.

Background and Objectives: Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy has become the first-line treatment for diabetic macular edema. However, it is still not clear whether anti-VEGF agents act on systemic blood vessels. The aim of this study is to determine whether a direct topical application or intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF will change the intestinal blood vessels of mice. Materials and Methods: C57BL/6 mice were laparotomied under deep anesthesia, and the blood vessels on the surface of the intestines were exposed, examined, and photographed through a dissecting microscope. Vascular changes were evaluated before and at 1, 5, and 15 min after the topical application of 50 µL of the different anti-VEGF agents onto the surface of the intestine (group S) or after the intravitreal injection (group V). The vascular density (VD) was determined for five mice in each group before and after 40 μg/μL of aflibercept (Af), or 25 μg/μL of bevacizumab (Be), or 10 μg/μL of ranibizumab (Ra) were applied. Endothelin-1 (ET1), a potent vasoconstrictor, was used as a positive control, and phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) was used as a control. Results: For group S, no significant changes were observed after PBS (baseline, 1, 5, and 15 min: 46.3, 44.5, 44.8, and 43.2%), Be (46.1, 46.7, 46.7, and 46.3%), Ra (44.7, 45.0, 44.7, and 45.6%), and Af (46.5, 46.2, 45.9, and 46.1%, repeated ANOVA) were applied topically. Significant decreases in the VD were observed after ET1 (46.7, 28.1, 32.1, and 34.0%, p < 0.05) was topically applied. For group V, no significant differences were observed for all anti-VEGF agents. Conclusions: The topical application or intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF agents do not cause a change in the VD of the intestinal vessels, which may be related to its safety.

Topical bromfenac as adjunctive treatment with intravitreal ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema

PurposeTo determine the safety and efficacy of adding topical bromfenac 0.09% in the treatment of diabetic macular edema.MethodsSeventy patients (70 eyes) with center involved diabetic macular edema with macular thickness (300–500 μm) were included. Patients were divided randomly into two groups: 35 eyes in each group. Both groups were treated with intravitreal ranibizumab monthly for three consecutive months. Bromfenac 0.09% eye drops twice daily was added to the treatment of study group for six months from commencement of treatment. The efficacy of topical bromfenac was evaluated by comparing both groups through follow-up period as regards to visual acuity, central and average thickness and the need for re-injection.ResultsPatients treated with topical bromfenac in addition to intravitreal ranibizumab revealed significant improvement in visual acuity, more reduction in central and average macular thickness and less tendency to need reinjection compared to those treated with ranibizumab alone (p 0.013, p 0.010 and p 0.022, respectively). No side effects was encountered with the use of topical bromfenac.ConclusionTopical bromfenac 0.09% twice a day could enhance and sustain the efficacy of intravitreal ranibizumab in the treatment of diabetic macular edema without increasing the incidence of corneal side effects.

Surgical Management of Diabetic Macular Edema

Diabetic macular edema (DME) is the accumulation of fluid in the extracellular space within the macula and is a major cause of visual impairment among patients with diabetes. First-line treatment for DME includes pharmacotherapy with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor medications and intravitreal corticosteroids. Alternative therapeutic strategies include laser photocoagulation for non-center involving DME, and surgical options such as pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with or without internal limiting membrane (ILM) peel in cases with vitreoretinal interface anomalies or DME refractory to pharmacotherapy, and the Port Delivery System (PDS) for sustained release of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) medication. Our aim is to review the existing literature on surgical management of DME including imaging changes in chronic DME and the clinical relevance of surgical intervention. Imaging changes associated with DME and a worse prognosis include disorganization of the retinal layer, disruption of both the external limiting membrane (ELM) and ellipsoid zone, and vitreomacular interface abnormalities. Studies involving pars plana vitrectomy with and without ILM peel show anatomic improvement but may not always be associated with significant change in visual outcomes. Early studies lacked detailed imaging of the retinal layers and PPV was likely performed as a last resort. In addition, the novel PDS is surgically implanted into the pars plana and works as a drug reservoir with controlled release of drug. However, it has been recalled in patients with wet age-related macular degeneration due to issues with dislodgement. Surgical interventions for DME include pars plana vitrectomy with and without ILM peel and new surgical therapies for DME such as the PDS and subretinal gene therapy have the potential to reduce the risk of DME progression.

Fundus autofluorescence in the evaluation of diabetic macular edema treatment response.

Fundus autofluorescence (FAF) has shown sensitivity in the detection of macular edema. To evaluate indices formed with FAF and retinal anatomical-functional variables in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) treated with ziv-aflibercept (ziv-AFL). Twenty-nine eyes of 15 DME patients who received ziv-AFL intravitreal injections were included in the study. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), contrast sensitivity (CS), optical coherence tomography (OCT) and FAF were evaluated before treatment and at one and two months. OCT variables were central subfield thickness (CST), macular volume (MV) and macular cube average thickness (MCAT). FAF/BCVA, FAF/CS, FAF/CST, FAF/MV and AF/MCAT indices baseline values were obtained. Analysis was performed with Spearman's rank correlation coefficient and linear regression analysis. There was a significant correlation between baseline FAF/BCVA index and BCVA at second month (rs = - 0.78, p = 0.000), between baseline FAF/CS index and BCVA at second month (rs = -0.68, p = 0.0009) and between baseline FAF/CS index and MV at first month of follow-up (rs = 0.64, p = 0.002). In DME, composite indices with baseline FAF predict variables such as BCVA in the follow-up of patients receiving ziv-AFL.

Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography After Macular Laser Treatment for Diabetic Macular Edema

Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography After Macular Laser Treatment for Diabetic Macular Edema

REal-world treatment outcomes after delayed intRavitreal therapy in center-involving diabetic macular edema – RETORT study

PurposeTo compare real-life data on delayed intravitreal treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME) patients to early treatment.MethodsIn this single-centre, retrospective, interventional, comparative study, DME patients were divided into two groups based on when they received treatment: Group 1 - received treatment within 24 weeks and Group 2 - at or after 24 weeks from the time of treatment advice. Visual acuity and central subfield thickness (CSFT) changes were compared at various time points. Reasons for delaying treatment were noted.ResultsThe study included 109 (Group 1–94; Group 2–15) eyes. When treatment was advised, demographic profile, diabetes duration, glucose control and VA between two groups were comparable. At this point, CSFT was higher in Group 1 than in Group 2 (p = 0.036). At injection time, Group 2 had better VA and lower CSFT than Group 1 (p < 0.05). Group 2’s VA (53.4 ± 12.67) was significantly lower than Group 1’s (57.38 ± 20.01) after 1-year treatment. At 1-year, CSFT decreased in Group 1 and increased in Group 2. Group 1 had mean improvement of + 7.6 letters and Group 2 had a decline of -6.9 letters. Group 2 required more intravitreal anti-VEGF (median – 3; IQR: 2–4), steroid injections (median – 4; IQR: 2–4) and focal laser sessions (median – 4; IQR: 2–4).ConclusionLate-treated DME eyes needed more injections and focal laser sessions than early treated eyes. Adherence to early treatment of DME in real-life will help prevent long-term vision loss.

BI-Y, an Neuropilin-1 Antagonist, Enhances Revascularization and Prevents Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-A Induced Retinal Hyperpermeability in Rodent Models of Retinopathies.

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a leading cause of vision loss in working-age adults. Despite an established standard of care for advanced forms of DR, some patients continue to lose vision after treatment. This may be due to the development of diabetic macular ischemia (DMI), which has no approved treatment. Neuropilin-1 (Nrp-1) is a coreceptor with two ligand-binding domains, with semaphorin-3A (Sema3A) binding to the A-domain and vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A) binding to the B-domain. Sema3A directs a subset of neuronal growth cones as well as blood vessel growth by repulsion; when bound to Nrp-1, VEGF-A mediates vascular permeability and angiogenesis. Modulating Nrp-1 could therefore address multiple complications arising from DR, such as diabetic macular edema (DME) and DMI. BI-Y is a monoclonal antibody that binds to the Nrp-1 A-domain, antagonizing the effects of the ligand Sema3A and inhibiting VEGF-A-induced vascular permeability. This series of in vitro and in vivo studies examined the binding kinetics of BI-Y to Nrp-1 with and without VEGF-A165, the effect of BI-Y on Sema3A-induced cytoskeletal collapse, the effect of BI-Y on VEGF- A165-induced angiogenesis, neovascularization, cell integrity loss and permeability, and retinal revascularization. The data show that BI-Y binds to Nrp-1 and inhibits Sema3A-induced cytoskeletal collapse in vitro, may enhance revascularization of ischemic areas in an oxygen-induced retinopathy mouse model, and prevents VEGF-A-induced retinal hyperpermeability in rats. However, BI-Y does not interfere with VEGF-A-dependent choroidal neovascularization. These results support further investigation of BI-Y as a potential treatment for DMI and DME. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Diabetic macular ischemia (DMI) is a complication of diabetic retinopathy (DR) with no approved pharmacological treatment. Diabetic macular edema (DME) commonly co-occurs with DMI in patients with DR. This series of preclinical studies in mouse and rat models shows that neuropilin-1 antagonist BI-Y may enhance the revascularization of ischemic areas and prevents vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A)-induced retinal hyperpermeability without affecting VEGF-A-dependent choroidal neovascularization; thus, BI-Y may be of interest as a potential treatment for patients with DR.

Efficacy of intravitreal bevacizumab on diabetic macular oedema in an African population.

To evaluate the short-term effect of intravitreal bevacizumab (avastin) injection on visual outcomes of patients with diabetic macular oedema. A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted to evaluate 39 eyes of thirty-nine patients (mean age ± SD: 61.4 ± 15.0years) that received intravitreal bevacizumab injection (1.25mg in 0.05ml) as treatment for diabetic macular oedema between January 2014 and July 2019 in Ghana. Data on visual acuity and central macular thickness before treatment and 6weeks post-treatment were collected and analysed using paired t-test. Ordinary least squares linear regression analysis was also conducted to determine the relationship between improvement in visual acuity and central macular thickness after treatment and other predictor variables. The mean ± SD visual acuity (LogMAR-equivalent of Snellen) of patients with diabetic macular oedema significantly improved from 0.84 ± 0.58 LogMAR before treatment to 0.69 ± 0.58 LogMAR at 6weeks post-treatment (mean difference: 0.15 ± 0.32 LogMAR; 95% CI: 0.04 to 0.25; p = 0.01). Mean macular thickness ± SD on the other hand, reduced significantly (p < 0.001) from 316.54 ± 75.35μm before treatment to 275.54 ± 57.43μm after treatment. While age and worse pre-treatment visual acuity predicted improvement in visual acuity after treatment, a higher central macular thickness before treatment predicted an improvement in central macular thickness after intravitreal bevacizumab injection. Treatment with intravitreal bevacizumab injection produces short-term improvement in vision and reduction in central macular thickness in African patients with diabetic macular oedema.

Brolucizumab (Beovu)

&#x0D; CADTH reimbursement reviews are comprehensive assessments of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, as well as patient and clinician perspectives, of a drug or drug class.&#x0D; The assessments inform non-binding recommendations that help guide the reimbursement decisions of Canada's federal, provincial, and territorial governments, with the exception of Quebec.&#x0D; This review assesses brolucizumab (Beovu), 6 mg (6 mg/0.05 mL solution) for intravitreal injection.&#x0D; Indication: For the treatment of diabetic macular edema.&#x0D;

Automated Macular Fluid Volume As a Treatment Indicator for Diabetic Macular Edema.

Introduction: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of automatically quantified macular fluid volume (MFV) for treatment-required diabetic macular edema (DME). Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study included eyes with DME. The commercial software on optical coherence tomography (OCT) produced the central subfield thickness (CST), and a custom deep-learning algorithm automatically segmented the fluid cysts and quantified the MFV from the volumetric scans of an OCT angiography system. Retina specialists treated patients per standard of care based on clinical and OCT findings without access to the MFV. The main outcome measures were the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity, and specificity of the CST, MFV, and visual acuity (VA) for treatment indication. Results: Of 139 eyes, 39 (28%) were treated for DME during the study period and 101 (72%) were previously treated. The algorithm detected fluid in all eyes; however, only 54 eyes (39%) met the DRCR.net criteria for center-involved ME. The AUROC of MFV predicting a treatment decision of 0.81 was greater than that of CST (0.67) (P = .0048). Untreated eyes that met the optimal threshold for treatment-required DME based on MFV (>0.031 mm3) had better VA than treated eyes (P = .0053). A multivariate logistic regression model showed that MFV (P = .0008) and VA (P = .0061) were significantly associated with a treatment decision, but CST was not. Conclusions: MFV had a higher correlation with the need for treatment for DME than CST and may be especially useful for ongoing management of DME.

Short-Term Outcomes of Intravitreal Faricimab Injection for Diabetic Macular Edema.

Background and Objectives: Faricimab is a novel bispecific antibody with Fab regions inhibiting both vascular endothelial growth factor-A and angiopoietin-2. Therefore, this study aimed to obtain short-term outcomes of intravitreal injection of faricimab (IVF) for the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME) in daily clinical practice. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review was carried out on consecutive patients with DME who had been treated with IVF and were followed up for at least 1 month. Outcome measures included changes in logMAR best-corrected visual acuity (logMAR BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), number of IVF administrations, and safety. Clinical outcomes were also compared between the treatment-naïve and switch groups. Results: A total of 21 consecutive DME eyes from 19 patients were identified. The mean number of IVFs was 1.6 ± 0.8 during the mean follow-up time of 5.5 months. The overall mean logMAR BCVA following IVF was 0.236, 0.204, 0.190, and 0.224 at baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months, respectively, without a significant change from baseline to 1 month (p = 0.176) or for 6 months (p = 0.923). The overall mean CRT (μm) following IVF was 400.6, 346.6, 342.1, and 327.5 at baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months, respectively. CRT significantly decreased from baseline to 1 month (p = 0.001) but did not reach a significant level over 6 months following IVF (p = 0.070). No significant difference in BCVA or CRT was observed between the treatment-naïve and switch groups. No serious safety concerns were noted. Conclusions: IVF for the treatment of DME may preserve visual acuity and improve macular thickness without serious safety concerns in the short term in a real-world clinical setting.

Evaluation of care with intravitreal aflibercept treatment for UK patients with diabetic macular oedema: DRAKO study 24-month real-world outcomes.

DRAKO (NCT02850263) was a 24-month, prospective, observational, multi-centre cohort study that enrolled patients diagnosed with diabetic macular oedema (DMO) including central involvement. The study aimed to evaluate standard of care intravitreal aflibercept (IVT-AFL) treatment in the UK. This analysis describes the 12-month outcomes for patients with prior anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment for DMO other than IVT-AFL (C2), and 2-year outcomes for both anti-VEGF treatment-naïve patients (C1) and C2 patients. Study eyes were treated with IVT-AFL as per local standard of care. Mean changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in ETDRS letters and central subfield thickness (CST) were stratified by baseline factors. Changes in diabetic retinopathy assessments, glycated haemoglobin A1c levels and vision-related quality of life (QoL) were evaluated alongside numbers of injections administered and safety outcomes. For C1, mean (SD) changes from baseline in BCVA of +0.7 (12.7) letters and CST of -123.3 (104.3) µm were observed at Month 24. For C2, mean (SD) changes from baseline for BCVA of + 0.2 (10.2) letters and -0.3 (13.0) letters, and CST of -79.1 (137.6) µm and -91.6 (132.9) µm, were observed at 12 and 24 months, respectively. In Year 2, C1 and C2 patients received a mean of 3.7 and 4.3 injections, respectively. Year 2 results indicate that IVT-AFL is an effective treatment for DMO in real-world UK clinical practice, despite relatively low injection numbers. The high baseline visual acuity and QoL scores were maintained and there was further improvement in anatomical outcomes.

Morphological changes of foveal cysts as a predictor for visual response to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatments in diabetic macular edema : Degenerative cyst in DME.

To investigate morphological changes of intraretinal cyst in association with visual acuity following treatment for diabetic macular edema. This retrospective study enrolled 105 eyes from 105 treatment naïve patients with diabetic macular edema following anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) data were obtained at baseline, 1, 3, 6, and 12months. The width and height of the largest intraretinal cyst (IRC) at all different visits were measured and were correlated to final visual acuity by receiver operating characteristic curve. The exudative feature was defined by the presence of hard exudates. Multivariate logistic regression was used to select the independent predictor for visual outcomes. Intraretinal cyst width but not the cyst height after treatment at 1month independently predicted final visual loss of ten letters or more (multivariate P = 0.009). The optimal cutoff value was 196 um with a sensitivity of 0.889 and a specificity of 0.656. Eyes with large IRC width using this cutoff were consistently larger than those with small IRC width through 12months (P = 0.008, Mann-Whitney U test). Small IRC width < 196 um at 1month was more likely to coexist with exudative feature (P = 0.011, Fisher's exact test). Among baseline factors, large IRC width predicted IRC width ≥ 196 um at 1month (multivariate P < 0.001). Cyst morphology following intravitreal injection predicts visual outcomes. Eyes with IRC width ≥ 196 um after treatment at 1month tends to be more degenerative, and less likely to coexist with exudative feature.

Anti-VEGF Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema in Denmark: Incidence, Burden of Therapy, and Forecasting Analyses

The aim of this study was to analyze demographically stratified incidence rates of patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) commenced in anti-VEGF therapy, to study temporal trends, to report the proportion of patients in active therapy over time, and to develop a model to forecast the future number of patients in active treatment. This was a retrospective registry-based study of all patients with DME who received at least one intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment from 1 January 2007 to 30 June 2022. Population data were extracted from Statistics Denmark. This study included 2220 patients with DME who were commenced in anti-VEGF therapy. Demographic analyses revealed higher incidence rates among males than females and among those aged 60-80 years. The number of patients in active treatment followed an exponential decay curve; hence, this was used to mathematically model the number of patients in active therapy. The number of patients in active treatment is expected to stay relatively stable with a minimal increase until the year 2023. This study provides insight into the practical aspects of the anti-VEGF treatment of DME that allow the planning of adequate health services.

Role of Vitrectomy in Nontractional Refractory Diabetic Macular Edema.

Currently, the gold standard of diabetic macular edema (DME) treatment is anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections, although a percentage of patients do not respond optimally. Vitrectomy with or without internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling is a well-established treatment for DME cases with a tractional component while its role for nontractional cases is unclear. The aim of this study is to evaluate the role of vitrectomy with or without ILM peeling in nontractional refractory DME. We performed a retrospective review of twenty-eight eyes with nontractional refractory DME treated with vitrectomy at San Giuseppe Hospital, Milan, between 2016 and 2018. All surgeries were performed by a single experienced vitreoretinal surgeon. In 43.4% of cases, the ILM was peeled. Best corrected visual acuity and optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans were assessed preoperatively and at 6, 12, and 24 months post-vitrectomy. The mean central macular thickness improved from 413.1 ± 84.4 to 291.3 ± 57.6 μm at two years (p < 0.0001). The mean logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution logMAR best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improved after two years, from 0.6 ± 0.2 to 0.2 ± 0.1 (p < 0.0001). We found no difference between ILM peeling vs. no ILM peeling group in terms of anatomical (p = 0.8) and visual outcome (p = 0.3). Eyes with DME and subfoveal serous retinal detachment (SRD) at baseline had better visual outcomes at the final visit (p = 0.001). We demonstrated anatomical and visual improvement of patients who underwent vitrectomy for nontractional refractory DME with and without ILM peeling. Improvement was greater in patients presenting subretinal fluid preoperatively.

Detectron2 for Lesion Detection in Diabetic Retinopathy

Hemorrhages in the retinal fundus are a common symptom of both diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema, making their detection crucial for early diagnosis and treatment. For this task, the aim is to evaluate the performance of two pre-trained and additionally fine-tuned models from the Detectron2 model zoo, Faster R-CNN (R50-FPN) and Mask R-CNN (R50-FPN). Experiments show that the Mask R-CNN (R50-FPN) model provides highly accurate segmentation masks for each detected hemorrhage, with an accuracy of 99.34%. The Faster R-CNN (R50-FPN) model detects hemorrhages with an accuracy of 99.22%. The results of both models are compared using a publicly available image database with ground truth marked by experts. Overall, this study demonstrates that current models are valuable tools for early diagnosis and treatment of diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema.

Assessing the Usage Anesthesia in the Surgical Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema

Diabetes-related macular edema is a fast-spreading condition that has damaged the lives of countless people throughout the globe. The current incorporation of subthreshold micropulse laser has indicated the precedence of laser therapy in the treatment of diabetic macular edema; nonetheless, vitreoretinal surgery in conjunction with anesthetics correlates with early mitigation of damage to the fovea. Surgery is a delicate procedure that necessitates careful consideration of the types and locations of anesthetics used. Depending on the individual being treated, various drugs and methods may be necessary. For example, some individuals may be allergic to conventional anesthetics, resulting in more severe consequences. In the surgical treatment of diabetic macular edema, the topical anesthetic was utilized more frequently than subconjunctival anesthesia, according to the review’s statistical analysis. The examined literature indicated that topical lidocaine was the most employed anesthetic for vitreoretinal surgery; however, alternatives to lidocaine exist, and their effects should be investigated. Consequently, we would want to highlight the impacts of each of the several surgical medications and anesthetics used to treat diabetic macular edema.

Combined intravitreal dexamethasone and bevacizumab injection for the treatment of persistent diabetic macular edema (DexaBe study): a phase I clinical study

PurposeThe aim of this study is to investigate the safety of combined intravitreal injection of dexamethasone aqueous-solution (IVD) and bevacizumab (IVB) in patients with refractory diabetic macular edema (DME) and its effect on intraocular pressure (IOP), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central subfield thickness (CSFT).MethodsThis prospective study included 10 patients (10 eyes) with DME refractory to laser photocoagulation and/or anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy. A complete ophthalmological examination was performed at baseline, during the first week of treatment, and monthly through week 24. Therapy consisted of monthly injections of combined IVD and IVB “pro re nata” (PRN) if CST > 300 µm. We investigated the impact of the injections on intraocular pressure (IOP), cataract development, Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and central sub-foveal thickness (CSFT) measured by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT).ResultsEight patients (80%) completed 24 weeks of follow-up. Compared to baseline, mean IOP increased significantly (p < 0.05) and anti-glaucomatous eye drops were necessary for 50% of the patients, CSFT was significantly reduced at all follow-up visits (p < 0.05), although mean BCVA showed no significant improvement. One patient developed dense cataract progression and another showed vitreoretinal traction at week 24. No inflammation or endophthalmitis was observed.ConclusionTreatment of DME refractory to laser and/or anti-VEGF therapy with combined PRN IV dexamethasone aqueous solution and bevacizumab was associated with adverse effects related to the use of corticosteroids. However, there was a significant improvement in CSFT meantime best-correct visual acuity remained stable or improved in 50% of patients.

Evolving Treatment Patterns in Diabetic Macular Edema Between 2015 and 2020.

Purpose: To explore the recent evolution of diabetic macular edema (DME) treatment practice patterns over 5 years among retina specialists in the United States. Methods: This retrospective analysis assessed 306 700 eyes with newly diagnosed DME from the Vestrum Health database between January 2015 and October 2020. The year-over-year and cumulative 5-year distributions of eyes treated with antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents, steroids, focal laser, or any combination and those of untreated eyes were calculated. Changes from baseline visual acuity were assessed. Results: Yearly treatment patterns changed significantly from 2015 (n = 18056) to 2020 (n = 11042). The proportion of untreated patients declined over time (32.7% vs 27.7%; P < .001), the use of anti-VEGF monotherapy increased (43.5% vs 61.8%; P < .001), the use of focal laser monotherapy declined (9.7% vs 3.0%; P < .001), and the use of steroid monotherapy remained stable (0.9% vs 0.7%; P = 1.000). Of eyes that maintained follow-up for 5 years (from 2015 to 2020), 16.3% were untreated while 77.5% were treated with anti-VEGF agents (as monotherapy or combination therapy). Vision gains in treated patients remained approximately stable from 2015 (3.6 letters) to 2020 (3.5 letters). Conclusions: From 2015 to 2020, treatment patterns for DME evolved toward greater anti-VEGF monotherapy, stable steroid monotherapy, less laser monotherapy, and fewer untreated eyes.

Intravitreal Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant (ILUVIEN®) for the Treatment of Retinal Conditions. A Review of Clinical Studies.

Fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) intravitreal implant (Iluvien®) is a corticosteroid implant indicated for the treatment of diabetic macular oedema (DMO) in patients who have previously received conventional treatment without good response, non-infectious posterior uveitis, and as an off-label treatment of the macular oedema secondary to retinal vein occlusion. FAc is a non-biodegradable 0.19 mg intravitreal implant which is designed to release FAc over 3 years at a rate of approximately 0.2 mcg per day. The aim of this review is to describe the special pharmacological properties of Iluvien and display the outcomes of the most important clinical trials and real-world studies regarding its efficacy and safety for the management of the above retinal disorders.