Treatment Of Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Research Articles

Clinical practice guidelines for the interventional treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer (5th edition)

Pancreatic cancer has become a major disease affecting people's health because of its insidiousness, rapid progression and poor prognosis. Based on the practical needs of clinical work, combined with domestic multi-center research and experience, this guideline provides constructive suggestions for the interventional treatment of pancreatic cancer.

Kampo Medicine Treatment for Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Case Series

Aims: The present report aims to investigate the use of Kampo medicine for advanced pancreatic cancer patients in order to prolong survival.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients with pancreatic cancer who presented to our Shimizu Clinic from 2000 to 2020. Patients who survived at least twice as long as the initial prognostic estimate were selected and their treatment was reviewed. The Kampo formula and crude drugs were selected according to the Kampo diagnosis and treatment strategy, which included qi and blood supplementation; qi, blood and water smoothing; and inflammation (termed “heat”) and cancer suppression.Results: Ten patients aged 45–80 years (six males and four females) with stage IV advanced cancer were selected. All patients received hozai, which is a tonic formula, of juzentaihoto (JTT) or hochuekkito (HET) decoction. Anti-cancer crude drugs were included in the decoctions of nine patients. At the first visit, the estimated life expectancy for all patients was no more than 1 year; however, treatment with Western and Kampo medicine led to a relatively long survival period of over 2 years. Three patients were still living at the time of this writing, more than 2, 6, and 14 years after treatment initiation.Conclusion: Our results suggest that Kampo medicine may be useful for disease control and supportive care for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

Fe2P nanorods based photothermal therapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors for pancreatic cancer

Abstract Treatment of pancreatic cancer is faced with great difficulties and challenges due to high lethality and metastasis. Synergism of targeted therapy and immunotherapy has been considered as ideal strategy to both eliminate primary tumors and control metastases. For the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer, we demonstrated a local photothermal therapy (PTT) following administration of monoclonal antibody of programmed death ligand 1 (αPD-L1). Fe2P nanorods were employed as a Fenton agent and photothermal agent, which modified with DSPE-PEG2000-Mal for improved biocompatibility and Mal mediated-antigen presentation. Under a low dose laser irradiation at 980 nm, Fe2P-PEG-Mal nanorods (NRs) mediated PTT could induce immunogenic tumor cell death that can cause dendritic cells (DCs) infiltration and maturation. In a bilateral pancreatic tumor model, the local treatment of NRs-PTT on primary tumor could cause the increased infiltration of cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) and decreased residential of M2 macrophages in untreated distal tumors. Furthermore, subsequently intervened αPD-L1 could enhance cell death triggered by CTLs in distal tumors through reversing immunosuppression. An orthotopic pancreatic tumor model was used to further confirm the therapeutic outcome. Finally, the combination of NRs based PTT and αPD-L1 based immunotherapy was able to significantly eliminate orthotopic pancreatic tumors and reduce mesentery metastases. Thus, the strategy may provide a more effective treatment for pancreatic cancer.

Clinical efficacy of apatinib as a second-line treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer in a Chinese tertiary cancer health facility

Purpose: To study the effectiveness and safety of apatinib as second-line treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer (APC) in a Chinese tertiary cancer hospital.
 Methods: Two groups of APC patients who received treatment with single-agent or two-drug combination of gemcitabine-based first-line therapy (50 per group) in The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing were assessed. The study group received apatinib at or above the second line treatment, while the control group was treated with second-line chemotherapy, which was different from first-line single-drug chemotherapy. Patients received treatments until there was improvement in their conditions, or until adverse reactions became intolerable. Complete remission (CR), partial remission (PR), disease stabilization (SD), disease progression (PD), incidence of adverse reactions, and progression-free survival (PFS) of the patients were recorded.
 Results: The number of PR cases in APC patients who received apatinib as second-line therapy, and the number of PD patients were higher than the corresponding populations in the control group (p < 0.05). Treatment effectiveness was significantly higher in study group patients than in control subjects (p < 0.05). However, the incidence of adverse reactions was lower in the study group than in control group. Median PFS in the study group (5 months) was significantly higher than that of the control group (4.1 months, p < 0.05).
 Conclusion: The clinical efficacy of apatinib as second-line treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer is higher than that of the single drug. Apatinib is associated with low incidence of adverse reactions which prolongs PFS. Thus, apatinib has potentials for the clinical management of pancreatic cancer.

The Antitumor Activity of Sodium Selenite Alone and in Combination with Gemcitabine in Pancreatic Cancer: An In Vitro and In Vivo Study.

Simple SummaryThe treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer represents a major challenge because of its chemoresistance and low survival rate. The aim of this research is to test a new antitumor agent (sodium selenite) in pancreatic cancer, both in vitro and in vivo, focusing on the molecular mechanisms involved and its combination with traditional chemotherapy (gemcitabine). Our results show that selenite has a strong antitumor effect against pancreatic cancer, via parthanatos cell death, and enhances the effect of gemcitabine via the p38 pathway in both in vitro and in vivo assays. These results could improve the outcome of pancreatic cancer patients and could be the start of future clinical trials.Sodium selenite acts by depleting enzymes that protect against cellular oxidative stress. To determine its effect alone or in combination with gemcitabine (GMZ) in pancreatic cancer, we used PANC-1 and Pan02 cell lines and C57BL mice bearing a Pan02-generated tumor. Our results demonstrated a significant inhibition of pancreatic cancer cell viability with the use of sodium selenite alone and a synergistic effect when associated with GMZ. The molecular mechanisms of the antitumor effect of sodium selenite alone involved apoptosis-inducing factor (AIF) and the expression of phospho-p38 in the combined therapy. In addition, sodium selenite alone and in association with GMZ significantly decreased the migration capacity and colony-forming ability, reduced tumor activity in multicellular tumor spheroids (MTS) and decreased sphere formation of cancer stem cells. In vivo studies demonstrated that combined therapy not only inhibited tumor growth (65%) compared to the untreated group but also relative to sodium selenite or GMZ used as monotherapy (up to 40%), increasing mice survival. These results were supported by the analysis of C57BL/6 albino mice bearing a Pan02-generated tumor, using the IVIS system. In conclusion, our results showed that sodium selenite is a potential agent for the improvement in the treatment of pancreatic cancer and should be considered for future human clinical trials.

Pharmacoeconomic Evaluation of Erlotinib for the Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer

PurposeTo evaluate the cost-effectiveness of gemcitabine and gemcitabine plus erlotinib as first-line treatments for advanced pancreatic cancer. MethodsOn the basis of the Gemcitabine With/Out Erlotinib in Unresectable Locally Advanced/Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer (PA.3) trial, the Markov model was constructed to simulate the development of advanced pancreatic cancer. Cost-effectiveness analysis was used to determine the economic level of the treatments, according to the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold. The sensitivity analysis was conducted for cost-effectiveness and other indexes. FindingsThe results of the cost-effectiveness analysis revealed that the cost-effectiveness ratios for the first-line treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer were ¥60,492.78 (US$8892.44/€7568.88) per 6.34 quality-adjusted life-months (QALMs) for gemcitabine and ¥99,595.39 (US$14,640.52/€12,461.42) per 7.02 QALMs for gemcitabine plus erlotinib. The incremental cost-effectiveness of the 2 regimens was ¥57,503.84 ($8453.06/€7194.90) per QALM, which was higher than the WTP set in this study (¥16,161 [$2375.66/€2022.07] per QALM). The results of the sensitivity analysis indicate that the analysis results were stable. Gemcitabine was more cost-effective than gemcitabine plus erlotinib. ImplicationsCompared with gemcitabine, gemcitabine plus erlotinib was not cost-effective at the level of the WTP. Gemcitabine plus erlotinib therapy has no economic significance as a first-line medical treatment for pancreatic cancer.

Sindilimab combined with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine as first-line treatment for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

e16257 Background: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Sindilimab combined with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine as first-line treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer. Methods: This was a single-arm, simple-center, exploratory trial, which included advanced pancreatic cancer pts. Patients received Sindilimab combined with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine. Combined chemotherapy lasted for no more than 12 cycles. Once chemotherapy intolerance occurred or at end of 12-cycle combined chemotherapy, pts with stable disease or objective response would continue to take Sindilimab as single agent until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Response was assessed every 8 weeks. Results: 16 eligible patients were enrolled and 14 pts were evaluable for efficacy analysis. Baseline characteristics are shown in Table 2. Conclusions: This study has showed high anti-tumor efficacy and tolerant toxicity in first-line regimen for advanced pancreatic cancer. Furthermore, it is needed to be proved in update results and large scale studies. Efficacy As shown in Table 3, among 14 evaluable pts, unconfirmed ORR was 57.1% and DCR was 92.8%. 8 pts got partial response (PR), 5 pts stable disease (SD) and 1 pts progressive disease(PD) at best. PFS: The primary endpoint 6-month PFS rate was 2%(95% CI 50.4%-72.4%). Which indicated that the primary endpoint of the study was reached. And mPFS was 7.3 months(95% CI 5.9-8.1). OS: Median OS was not reached and 6m-OS rate was 85.7% (95%CI 5%-91.3%). Safety. All 16 pts were included in the safety analysis (Table 4). The overall AE incidence rate was 93.75% .≥Grade 3 irAE included GGT increased (37.5%) and peripheral neuropathy (6.25%). No TRAE led to death.[Table: see text][Table: see text][Table: see text][Table: see text]

Gemcitabine/nab-Paclitaxel versus FOLFIRINOX for palliative first-line treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer: A propensity score analysis

BackgroundGemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (GN) and FOLFIRINOX are standard first-line treatment options for advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (aPDAC), but currently no prospective randomised head-to-head comparison between these treatments has yet been performed. MethodsWe conducted a comparative propensity score (PS) analysis of overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in a tri-centre cohort of patients with aPDAC undergoing palliative first-line treatment with either GN or FOLFIRINOX. ResultsIn unadjusted analysis, OS and PFS were highly similar between patients treated with GN (n = 297) and FOLFIRINOX (n = 158). In detail, median, 1- and 2-year OS estimates were 10.1 months, 42% and 18% in the GN group, as compared to 11.2 months, 45% and 12% in the FOLFIRINOX group, respectively (log-rank p = 0.783). Accordingly, median (4.6 versus 4.8 months), 6-month (40% versus 43%) and 1-year (9% versus 9%) PFS estimates did not significantly differ (log-rank p = 0.717). However, patients treated with FOLFIRINOX were significantly younger, had fewer comorbidities, and a better Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status. These imbalances were accounted for by weighting the data with the PS. In PS analysis of survival outcomes, OS and PFS remained comparable between the two treatment groups. In detail, PS-weighted median, 1- and 2-year OS estimates were 10.1 months, 42% and 18% in the GN group, as compared to 10.1 months, 40% and 13% in the FOLFIRINOX group (PS-weighted log-rank p = 0.449). PS-weighted PFS estimates again did not differ (PS-weighted log-rank p = 0.329). ConclusionThis real-world comparative effectiveness study indicates that FOLFIRINOX and GN have similar effectiveness in the palliative first-line treatment of aPDAC.

Number of nonsynonymous genomic variants may correlate with prognosis in advanced pancreatic cancer.

432 Background: Pancreatic cancer is associated with poor outcomes at any stage. A very small number of patients - approximately 3% of those with metastatic disease - experience long-term survival through 5 years but the biologic mechanisms underlying the benefit observed with these “exceptional responders” are incompletely understood. We explored potential genomic differences between exceptional responders and typical responders to treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer that could confer a more favorable biology. Methods: We included consecutive exceptional responders and matched controls (MCs) with advanced pancreatic cancer in a 1:3 ratio from the Cleveland Clinic from April, 2013 – August, 2017. ERs were defined as patients with overall survival (OS) > 18 months for metastatic disease and > 24 months for locally advanced disease. Controls were matched by age, gender, stage and type of chemotherapy given and experienced OS at or below median survival for their stages. Clinical variables including demographics, comorbidities, stage, histology and treatment history were collected. Next generation sequencing (NGS) was performed for DNA sequencing of 648 genes and tumor mutation burden (TMB) on available tissue. The study population initially comprised of 14 exceptional responders and 42 MCs. However, only 4 exceptional responders and 6 MCs were included for analysis due to insufficient tissue for NGS for the remaining patients. Descriptive statistics were used for statistical analysis. Differences in survival outcomes were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Results: The median ages for the exceptional responders and MCs were 69 and 67.5 years, respectively. Both groups were at least 75% male and white. Of the exceptional responders, 50% had pancreatic tail primaries compared to 0% of the MCs. There were no differences between groups in first-line chemotherapy used. Exceptional responders had significantly fewer non-synonymous mutations compared to MCs (2.25 vs. 5.17, p = 0.014). Mutation count < 3 was associated with significantly better progression-free survival (PFS) and OS as shown in the Table. TMB did not differ between exceptional responders and MCs (4.88 vs. 5.70 Muts/Mb, p = 0.39). Of the exceptional responders, 50% had alterations in BAGE2 versus 0% of MCs. Conversely, 50% of MCs had alterations in LRP1B, CUL4B or APC vs. 0% of exceptional responders. Conclusions: Having a lower number of non-synonymous mutations may correlate with exceptional response to systemic therapy and therefore with improved survival in pancreatic cancer. Pancreatic tail primary may also be associated with improved outcomes. These findings, though limited by small sample size, should encourage future study into genomic signatures of exceptional response. [Table: see text]

AGIG chemo-immunotherapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: A single-arm, single-center, phase II study.

384 Background: To date, chemotherapy remains the only effective treatment of unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. In the last few years, the interest in the use of immunological anticancer strategies is greatly increased. AGIG is a novel chemo-immunotherapy regimen that combines nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine chemotherapy with sequential recombinant interleukin-2 and granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) therapy. We conducted a single-arm prospective phase II study to determine the efficacy and safety of the first-line treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer with AGIG regimen. Methods: Nab-paclitaxel (120 mg/m2) and gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) were administered intravenously to all patients on days 1 and 8 triweekly, interleukin-2 and GM-CSF (100 µg) were administered subcutaneously on days 3-5 after chemotherapy. The primary end point was ORR by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1. Secondary end points included safety profile, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS). Patients’ conditions and the efficacy and safety were assessed every 4 cycles. Results: Between 11/2018 and 01/2020, 64 patients were enrolled. In the 64 evaluable patients, the ORR and DCR were 43.75% and 76.6%, respectively. The median follow-up time was 12.1 (range 7.1–22.4) months, the median PFS was 5.7 (range 1.63–15.8) months, and the median OS was 14.2 (range 2.9–22.0) months. The most common adverse event was fever (75%). The incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenia was 4.69%. In subgroup analyses, we found that eosinophil count in the blood elevated three times higher than baseline level predicted a longer survival. Conclusions: The AGIG Chemo-immunotherapy regimen has presented encouraging ORR, OS, and manageable toxicities as first-line therapy for advanced pancreatic cancer. This regimen may be a novel reliable therapeutic option for patients with preserved performance status. The improvement of treatment efficiency may be related to the activation of non-specific immune response. Clinical trial information: NCT0376867. Research Sponsor: The Affiliated Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School. [Table: see text]

Comprehensive pharmacogenetic analysis of DPYD, UGT, CDA, and ABCB1 polymorphisms in pancreatic cancer patients receiving mFOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel.

Modified FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX) and gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel (GemNab) regimens represent a standard treatment in advanced pancreatic cancer (aPC). DPYD and UGT1A1 variants are relevant predictors of fluoropyrimidine and irinotecan-associated adverse events (AEs). Furthermore, data about the associations between polymorphisms in ABCB and CDA genes and GemNab-related toxicities are still controversial. The present study analyzes the association between DPYD, UGT, ABCB1, CDA variants, and AEs in aPC patients (pts) treated with mFOLFIRINOX or GemNab. Blood samples collected from 104 aPC pts treated with mFOLFIRINOX and 63 with GemNab were tested for DPYD c.1679T>G, IVS14+1G>A, c.2194G>A, c.2846A>T, UGT1A1*28, CDA c.79A>C, andABCB1 c.1236C>T, c.2677G>T/A, c.3435C>T by real-time PCR and automatic sequencing. In mFOLFIRINOX cohort, DPYD IVS14+1GA genotype was associated with G4 hematological AEs, while the UGT1A1*28 significantly correlated with the risk of thrombocytopenia (p = 0.006). In the GemNab cohort, a significant association between CDA c.79CC and high-grade nausea was observed (p = 0.002). Moreover, the presence of at least a mutant allele in ABCB1 increased the risk of overall hematological AEs (p = 0.01), both furtherstrengthened by the presence of CDA c.79CC (p = 0.0002). DPYD IVS14+1A allele is confirmed to be associated with fluoropyrimidine life-threatening toxicities, and UGT1A1*28 is related with a higher risk of hematologic AEs following irinotecan treatment. CDA c.79C and ABCB1 c.1236T, c.2677T/A, and c.3435T mutant alleles are predictive biomarkers of GemNab-related AEs. All these variants should be considered in aPC pts candidate to mFOLFIRINOX or GemNab treatments.

A phase II study of gemcitabine, erlotinib and S-1 in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

Background: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine in combination with erlotinib and S-1 for the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer.Methods: Chemotherapy-naïve patients with pathologically-proven locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma were assessed for eligibility. Gemcitabine was administered at 1,000 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1 and 8, erlotinib was administered at 100 mg/day on days 1-21, and S-1 was administered at 60 mg/m2 on days 1-14 every 21 days and continued to a maximum of 8 cycles of treatment. Dose escalation of S-1 to 80 mg/m2 was permitted from the second cycle for pre-defined tolerable patients.Results: Thirty-seven patients (median age 61.5 years) were enrolled. A total of 140 cycles of chemotherapy were administered (median of 3.8; range 1-8 cycles). Toxicities were evaluated in 36 patients, and the responses were evaluated in 32 patients. Major grade 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia (25%), febrile neutropenia (2.8%), fatigue (22.2%), infection (8.3%), vomiting (5.6%), and mucositis (5.6%). The confirmed overall response rate was 12.5% [95% confidence interval (CI), 5.1-28.9%] and the disease control rate was 71.9% (95% CI, 56.8-86.3%). The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 3.7 months (95% CI, 2.8-4.6 months) and 6.7 months (95% CI, 3.4-9.9 months), respectively.Conclusion: The combination of gemcitabine, erlotinib, and S-1 provided an acceptable toxicity profile and modest clinical benefits in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

Efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer by transcatheter arterial chemotherapy

Efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer by transcatheter arterial chemotherapy

Efficacy of mistletoe extract as a complement to standard treatment in advanced pancreatic cancer: study protocol for a multicentre, parallel group, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trial (MISTRAL)

BackgroundMost pancreatic cancer patients present with advanced stage at diagnosis with extremely short expected survival and few treatment options. A multimodal palliative approach is necessary for symptom relief and optimisation of health-related quality of life. In a recent open-label trial of mistletoe extract for advanced pancreatic cancer patients not eligible for chemotherapy, promising results on improved overall survival and better health-related quality of life were reported.The objective of the present study is to assess the value of mistletoe extract as a complement to standard treatment (palliative chemotherapy or best supportive care) in advanced pancreatic cancer patients with regard to overall survival and health-related quality of life.MethodsThe trial is prospective, randomised, double-blind, multicentre, parallel group and placebo-controlled. In total, 290 participants are randomly assigned to placebo or mistletoe extract given subcutaneously in increasing dosage from 0.01 to 20 mg three times per week for 9 months. Stratification is performed for site and palliative chemotherapy. Main inclusion criteria are advanced pancreatic cancer and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 2; main exclusion criteria are life expectancy less than 4 weeks and neuroendocrine tumour of the pancreas. Two ancillary studies on sub-sets of participants are nested in the trial: a biomarker study collecting blood samples and a cross-sectional qualitative study with semi-structured face-to-face interviews.DiscussionTo our knowledge, this is the first placebo-controlled randomised trial assessing the impact of mistletoe extract as a complement to standard treatment on overall survival and health-related quality of life in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. The presented trial with its two nested ancillary studies exploring biomarkers and patient experiences is expected to give new insights into the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer.Trial registrationEU Clinical Trial Register, EudraCT Number 2014-004552-64. Registered on 19 January 2016.ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02948309. Registered on 28 October 2016.

1530P Gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel versus (modified) FOLFIRINOX for palliative first-line treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer: A propensity score analysis

1530P Gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel versus (modified) FOLFIRINOX for palliative first-line treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer: A propensity score analysis

Comparison of Image-Guided Iodine-125 Seed Interstitial Brachytherapy and Local Chemotherapy Perfusion in Treatment of Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of iodine-125 seed interstitial brachytherapy and local chemotherapy perfusion in treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer. Methods The present open prospective randomized control study included a total of 165 cases of advanced pancreatic cancer patients who were admitted in our hospital during December 2016 to April 2019. All patients were randomized into two groups with 84 cases in iodine-125 group and 81 cases in chemotherapy perfusion group. Basic clinical characteristics and demographic data were collected. The main outcome was the tumor efficiency. The pain condition was measured by visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Karnofsky score was also measured at different time points, before the treatment, 1 d, 7 d, 14 d, 1 mon, 2 mon and 3 mon after treatment. Serum levels of CEA, CA19-9 and CA50 were measured by immunochemiluminescence. The overall survival was analyzed by K-M curve. Results The ratio of partial remission patients was significantly higher, and the ratio of stable disease (SD)+progressive disease patients was also remarkably lower in iodine-125 group than the chemotherapy perfusion group. The mean VAS scores decreased markedly after treatment and were significantly lower and the mean Karnofsky scores were remarkably higher in iodine-125 group than the chemotherapy perfusion group. The levels of CA19-9 and CA50 were remarkably lower in iodine-125 group, however no significant difference was found for CEA. The survival analysis by K-M curve showed the iodine-125 patients had longer overall survival time than the chemotherapy perfusion group. No infection, pancreatic fistula, biliary fistula, intestinal fistula, gastrointestinal obstruction or radiation enteritis was found in both groups. Conclusion Iodine-125 seed interstitial brachytherapy could achieve better efficacy with no increased side complications than chemotherapy perfusion in advanced pancreatic cancer.

(3E,5E)-3,5-Bis(pyridin-3-methylene)-tetrahydrothiopyran-4-one enhances the inhibitory effect of gemcitabine on pancreatic cancer cells

Gemcitabine (GEM) is a commonly used treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer. However, chemoresistance and toxic side effect limits its clinical success. In an earlier study, our laboratory found that the curcumin analogue, (3E,5E)-3,5-Bis(pyridin-3-methylene)-tetrahydrothiopyran-4-one (FN2) had strong inhibitory effect on human pancreatic cancer cells. In the present study, we investigated the effects of FN2 in combination with GEM on growth inhibition and apoptosis in human pancreatic cancer Panc-1 cells. The results showed that the combination of FN2 and GEM synergistically inhibited the growth of Panc-1 cells. Panc-1 cells survived the GEM treatment became partially resistant to the drug. Treatment with FN2 in combination with GEM strongly inhibited the growth and stimulated apoptosis in the GEM resistant Panc-1 cells. Mechanistic studies showed that inhibition of cell growth and induction of apoptosis in the GEM resistant Panc-1 cells were associated with decreases in activation of NF-κB and Akt. FN2 in combination with GEM also decreased the level of Bcl-2 and increased the level of Bax. Results of the present study indicate that GEM in combination with FN2 may represent an effective strategy for improving the efficacy of GEM and decreasing the resistance of pancreatic cancer to GEM chemotherapy.

PD-1 antibody combined with paclitaxel (albumin bound) and gemcitabine as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.

TPS4665 Background: Pancreatic cancer is a malignant tumor with limited therapeutic strategies and poor prognosis. About 60% of the patients have metastasis disease at time of diagnosis and lose the opportunity for surgery. Thus, therapy based on drugs becomes a vital part in pancreatic cancer. In 2013, MPACT showed that albumin-bound paclitaxel combined with gemcitabine in the treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer could increase the mOS from 6.6 months to 8.7 months (HR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.62-0.83; P < 0.001). Nowadays, the immunosuppressive checkpoint inhibitors acting on PD-1/PD-L1 pathway have shown a significant efficacy in enhancing tumor immune surveillance and anti-tumor immune response. In 2018, two studies reported in ASCO showed the preliminary efficacy of albumin paclitaxel, gemcitabine and PD-1 inhibitor in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer. Among patients who have not received treatment before, the disease control rate was even up to 100%. Therefore, this study will further explore the domestic PD-1 antibody combined with albumin-bound paclitaxel and gemcitabine as the first-line treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer among Chinese pancreatic cancer patients. Methods: This is a prospective, single-armed, exploratory, investigator initiated trial to explore the efficacy and safety of PD-1 antibody combined with albumin-bound paclitaxel and gemcitabine as first-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer. This study is, to our knowledge, the first one to test the efficacy and safety of PD-1 antibody on metastatic pancreatic cancer patients among Chinese population. Survival index is median survival estimated by Kaplan-Meier and draw the survival curve. The response rate was compared by χ 2 test / Fisher test. All primary and secondary outcomes will be analyzed on the full analysis set. PD-1 antibody, 200mg, D1 administration; paclitaxel (albumin binding type), 125mg/m2, D1, 8 days administration; gemcitabine, 1000mg/m2, D1, 8 days administration, every 21 days as a cycle and PD-1 antibody (200mg, D1, every 21 days) single drug maintenance treatment is given after the completion of 6 cycle chemotherapy. Major eligibility criteria is that each participant must have metastatic pancreatic cancer confirmed by histology or cytology and has never received systemic anti-tumor therapy before. So far, 11 of planned 20 patients have been enrolled. Clinical trial information: NCT04181645 .

The role of response as predictor of improved outcome in advanced pancreatic cancer (APC) patients (pts) treated with first-line Gemcitabine plus Nab-paclitaxel (GemNab).

e16758 Background: GemNab is one of the first-line standard treatment (tx) of APC. To date, no predictive factors, both clinical and molecular, of benefit from this regimen exist. Two retrospective studies showed that early tumor shrinkage (ETS) can predict an improved outcome in APC pts receiving a first-line tx with FOLFIRINOX or GemNab. However, data regarding GemNab, limited to a small population of only 57 pts, seem to not confirm the association of ETS with a better outcome. Hence, we retrospectively analysed an homogeneous population of APC treated with first-line GemNab at our Institution, investigating the impact of several clinical factors, including response and ETS. Methods: APC pts receiving a first-line tx with GemNab were included in the analysis. The association of RECIST response and ETS with PFS and OS was evaluated. The following variables were collected: gender; age ( > vs ≤ 55 years and ≥ vs < 70 years ); baseline ECOG PS; Ca 19.9 baseline level (≥ vs < 200); anamnesis of diabetes; site of primary tumor (head/uncinate process vs body/tail); locally A vs metastatic (m) PC; synchronous vs metachronous; number of m sites (1 vs > 1); m sites (liver, peritoneum, lung, nodes); number of tx lines (1 vs > 1). Univariate and multivariate analyses for PFS and OS were performed. Results: A total of 184 APC pts receiving first-line GemNab at our Institution from February 2014 to May 2019 were included in the analysis. RR and ETS were assessed in 174 and 168 pts, respectively. RR was 30%, disease control rate (DCR) 63% and ETS was 24%. Responders had a significant better PFS (12.5 vs 5.7 months, p < 0.0001) and OS (25.1 vs 12.1 months, p < 0.0001). ETS was significantly associated with improved PFS (12.3 vs 6.2 months, p < 0.0001) and OS (24.0 vs 12.8 months, p < 0.0001). At the multivariate analysis a significant association with survival parameters was confirmed for RECIST response, but not for ETS. At the multivariate analysis, also metachronous disease and number of tx lines > 1 were independently associated with better OS. Conclusions: Despite its retrospective nature, this is one of the largest series of APC pts treated with first-line GemNab investigating the role of RECIST response and ETS in predicting outcome. On the basis of our results, RECIST response may be considered a positive prognostic factor, whereas ETS does not. In conclusion, achieving tumor shrinkage, not necessarily early, significantly delays PC progression and prolongs survival in pts treated with first-line GemNab.

Apartinib in combination with S-1 for the second-line treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer (APC).

TPS781 Background: The prognosis for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (APC) is extremely dismal. First-line treatment for APC is gemcitabine/5-FU-based chemotherapy with no standard second-line treatment. Anti-angiogenic therapy combined with chemotherapy have showed its effects in improving the outcomes in a variety of cancers. Apatinib is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor that selectively targets VEGFR2. Some preclinical studies and several case reports showed the anti-tumor effect of apatinib in pancreatic cancer, but there is no evidence from clinical trial to confirm it. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of apartinib in combination with S-1 as the second-line therapy for patients with APC. Methods: In this open-label, single-arm, randomized phase II study, we will recruit 30 patients with pathologically proven advanced pancreatic cancer after the failure of first-line chemotherapy. All patients are aged 18-70 years with ECOG PS 0-2 and will receive apatinib at an initial dose of 500mg/d on a continuous basis, and oral S-1 (60mg/d for BSA < 1.25m2, 80mg/d for 1.25<BSA < 1.5m2, and 100mg for BSA >1.5m2, orally) twice a day on days 1-14 of a 21-day cycle. Primary endpoint is PFS. Secondary endpoints include OS, duration of response, ORR and DCR. The safety of apartinib + S-1 will be evaluated by CTCAE v4.0. Translational research will be performed in blood (before and on-treatment): cytokine panel to explore predictive and prognostic biomarkers. Clinical trial information: NCT03662035.