Treatment Escalation Plans Research Articles

Increased frailty is associated with risk of hospital-acquired infections and death during heart failure hospital admissions

Abstract Background Frailty is common in patients admitted with acute decompensation of heart failure (ADHF) and it is unclear how the frailty syndrome affects heart failure (HF) patients during their acute hospital admission. Understanding the interplay between frailty, impaired renal function, hospital-acquired infections (HAI), and death may be useful in optimising patient care and prognosis. Purpose The aim of this analysis was to explore the relationship between admission frailty levels and the incidence of HAI, acute kidney injury (AKI), and mortality in acute HF hospital admissions. Methods This is a retrospective analysis of data submitted from a single centre to the National HF audit between January and June 2023. Additional frailty and baseline renal function data was retrospectively collected from electronic patient health records. Patients were categorised into three groups according to their Rockwood Clinical Frailty Scale (CSF) (1): no/mild frailty (CFS 1-3), moderate frailty (CFS 4-6) and severe frailty (CFS 7-9). AKI was defined based on baseline and admission creatinine, as per KDIGO guidelines (2). Chi-squared and t-tests were used to compare baseline characteristics between frailty groups. Chi-squared tests were used to compare frailty groups in terms of: HAI, AKI, mortality. Results Between 1st January and 22nd June 2023, there were 344 acute HF hospital admissions in our centre. Most patients had moderate frailty on admission (n=256, 74.4%). Frail patients were significantly older, had a lower admission mean haemoglobin and more were female, compared to non-frail patients (Figure 1A). Patients who were more frail were more likely to experience HAI during their admission; p=0.035 (figure 1B). Furthermore, patients with HAI had a greater risk of mortality, at a median follow-up of 171 (IQR 100.25) days after admission, compared to those without HAI (p>0.001). 41.9% of acute HF admissions were associated with an AKI, and although numerically more frail patients had an AKI, this did not achieve statistical significance (p=0.084). Patients who were more frail were more likely to die, both during hospital admission and at 3 months following discharge; p<0.001 (Figure 1B). Furthermore, this trend persisted after follow-up; p<0.001 (Figure 2). Conclusions Patients with moderate or severe frailty are at greater risk of adverse events (HAI, death) during an acute HF hospital admission, than patients with no or mild frailty. It is imperative to consider the frailty status of all patients with ADHF, to be aware of the frailty-associated risks, and act proactively with targeted interventions (screen for infections, daily bloods, early conversations with patients and their families about treatment escalation plans and patient priorities) to improve outcomes and enhance the quality of care for this vulnerable patient population. Further research is warranted to explore potential interventions to address frailty-related risks in HF management.

End-stage heart failure patients in ICU: the importance of advance planning and effective communication.

During the disease trajectory, patients with advanced heart failure are often hospitalised with a high probability of admission to the intensive care setting. Using a case study, this article explores the care given to a patient with decompensated heart failure in an intensive care unit (ICU). It will discuss the significance of holistic assessment and effective symptom management, in particular the research related to breathlessness management. The importance of effective communication within the ICU multidisciplinary team, including with the patient/family will be explored, as the ICU environment can often lead to communication breakdown, patients being unable to voice their wishes and over-medicalisation. The effectiveness of early involvement of the palliative care team in ICU will be examined, including the use of tools such advance care planning and a treatment escalation plan and whether use of these can enable a better patient and family experience at the end of life. The role of palliative care champions will be discussed.

Improving Advanced Care Planning: Documentation of DNA CPR Orders and TEPs in Residential Care Admissions

Abstract Background Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNA CPR) orders and Treatment Escalation Plans (TEPs) are key components of advanced care planning for managing patients with progressive life-limiting illnesses and significant frailty. Our study aimed to determine the proportion of such patients being transferred from residential care facilities with documented TEPs upon medical admission, examine whether these TEPs were revised during the hospital stay, and assess patient outcomes at 14 days post-presentation. Methods We reviewed the lists of patients who had been referred for medical admission via the emergency department over a one-month period and identified those presenting from residential care facilities. We excluded those under the age of 65. We reviewed relevant medical notes and collected anonymised data into an Excel spreadsheet on a password protected computer. Results We identified 34 patient’s relevant patients. Notes were available for review in 31 cases (17 male; age range 66 to 96 years old, mean age 82.3). Of the 31 cases reviewed, the mean Clinical Frailty Score was 7.4. Residential care facilities sent documentation outlining TEPs in 19/31 cases. In those cases, 4/19 specified full resuscitation. In 3/4 of these cases, the TEP was revised during their admission. In one case, documentation specified that the patient did not want to be transferred to hospital under any circumstances. A total of 14 patients had no documentation regarding TEP. Of those, 7/14 went on to have DNA CPR orders filled out during their admission. At 14 days post presentation, 7 had died in hospital, 16 were discharged back to their residential care facility, and the remainder remained inpatient. Conclusion These findings underscore the need for better advance care planning, potentially improving patient management and reducing the emotional burden on patients, healthcare providers and families during critical moments.

Treatment Escalation Plans: A Snapshot Review on Acute Medical Wards

Abstract Background In medical care, Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNA CPR) orders serve as vital tools in determining whether CPR should be administered to patients, particularly those with progressive life-limiting illnesses or approaching the end of life. Failure to make timely and appropriate CPR-related decisions and treatment escalation plans can lead to the risk of administering futile or inappropriate treatments. Methods Admission booklets in our centre prompt clinicians to indicate whether a patient was for CPR or not as part of the admission process, with further instructions to fill out a DNA CPR form if applicable. We conducted a chart review on acute medical wards to assess the frequency and adequacy of DNA CPR decision-making and communication. Data was collected by three investigators on a structured proforma and anonymised. Data analysis was conducted using Excel. Results Data was collected on 67 patients, with a mean age of 76.6. Of those 67, only six had CPR status indicated on admission, with five specified for resuscitation and one not for resuscitation. A total of 14 patients went on to have DNA CPR forms filled out during admission, but in only five cases were these decisions discussed with the patients themselves. The main reasons for lack of patient involvement in the discussions included confusion and cognitive impairment. Documentation regarding discussions with next of kin was present in eight cases. Conclusion Our snapshot review underscores the importance of early discussions regarding treatment escalation plans and DNA CPR decisions. Our findings reveal that these discussions are not occurring as frequently as advised, and when decisions are made, they are not adequately communicated with patients or those close to them. There is an urgent need for further training on the legal aspects and ethical considerations surrounding DNA CPR decisions to ensure better patient-centered care and decision-making.

SP9.5 - Peri-operative Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA): A new benchmark for Acute General Surgery patients

Abstract Aims More than 50% of patients undergoing emergency general surgery are over 65 years of age. NICE guidelines emphasise frailty assessment in acute surgical settings, particularly in the preoperative period. Similarly, the Emergency Laparotomy and Frailty (ELF) study showed associations between frailty (CFS ≥ 5) and 90-day mortality, increased complication and length of hospital stay in older emergency laparotomy patients. NELA best practice tariff (BPT) April 2023 heavily focuses on perioperative team involvement in frailer, older patients. This is an audit from a city teaching hospital, with a surgical liaison team against standards set by NELA. Methods Review of patients aged ≥ 65 undergoing emergency laparotomies between August and November 2023 (pre-intervention) then December and January 2024 (post-intervention). Data collected includes whether patients had a documented frailty score, a clearly documented CPR decision & treatment escalation plan (TEP), pre- or post-operative medical review, and advanced-care planning (ACP) post-operatively. Intervention included dedicated members of surgical liaison team following patients throughout admission, weekly meetings to discuss laparotomy patients, older patient template being created capturing ceilings of care, frailty score, and social history. Results Post intervention, improvement in clear documentation regarding escalation, frailty level. Greater level of MDT collaboration with regards to older patients undergoing laparotomies. Conclusion Changes in NELA BPT emphasise the importance of comprehensive geriatric assessment in the management of older laparotomy patients. Even a basic surgical liaison service can achieve high levels of compliance with a few simple strategies, resulting in better outcomes for patients as well as financial benefits for Trusts.

Shared decision-making with older people on TReatment Escalation planning for Acute deterioration in the emergency Medical Setting: a qualitative study of Clinicians' perspectives (STREAMS-C).

Shared decision-making (SDM) is increasingly expected in healthcare systems prioritising patient autonomy. Treatment escalation plans (TEPs) outline contingency for medical intervention in the event of patient deterioration. This study aimed to understand clinicians' perspectives on SDM in TEP for older patients in the acute medical setting. This was a qualitative study following a constructivist approach. Semistructured interviews with vignettes were conducted with 26 consultant and registrar doctors working in emergency medicine, general internal medicine, intensive care medicine and palliative care medicine. Reflexive thematic analysis was performed. There were three themes: 'An unequal partnership', 'Options without equipoise' and 'Decisions with shared understanding'. Clinicians' expertise in synthesising complex, uncertain clinical information was contrasted with perceived patient unfamiliarity with future health planning and medical intervention. There was a strong sense of morality underpinning decision-making and little equipoise about appropriate TEP decisions. Communication around the TEP was important, and clinicians sought control over the high-stakes decision whilst avoiding conflict and achieving shared understanding. Clinicians take responsibility for securing a 'good' TEP decision for older patients in the acute medical setting. They synthesise clinical data with implicit ethical reasoning according to their professional predictions of qualitative and quantitative success following medical intervention. SDM is seldom considered a priority for this context. Nonetheless, avoidance of conflict, preserving the clinical relationship and shared understanding with the patient and family are important.

2142 Shared decision-making on treatment escalation planning in the acute medical setting for older patients: a qualitative study

Abstract Introduction Shared Decision-Making (SDM) is increasingly expected in most aspects of UK medical practice and can be particularly important for older patients to guide goals of care. Treatment Escalation Plans (TEP) summarise medical intervention to be attempted in the event of acute deterioration. Current guidance advocates SDM in TEP but it is unclear whether this is considered practicable by clinicians. This study aims to understand clinicians’ perspectives on SDM in TEP for older patients in the acute medical setting. Methods This was a qualitative study following a relativist constructivist approach. 26 consultant and registrar doctors were recruited from general internal medicine, intensive care, palliative care and emergency medicine. A clinical doctoral student conducted semi-structured interviews including vignettes of older multi-morbid patients with capacity to discuss treatment escalation. Reflexive thematic analysis was performed. Ethics approvals were obtained from the Health Research Authority 22/HRA/4387. Results Three themes were generated: ‘An unequal partnership’, ‘Options without equipoise’ and ‘Decisions with shared understanding’. SDM incorporating patient preferences with clinical opinion was seldom perceived to be appropriate. Clinical complexity and use of intuition, together with lack of perceived moral equipoise, motivated clinicians to develop medically acceptable TEPs. Shared understanding with the patient and family and avoiding conflict were important. Conclusions Contrary to current guidance, SDM was considered a potential barrier to formulating appropriate TEPs in the acute medical setting. This study suggests potential incompatibility between policies prioritising patient autonomy and the right to make unwise decisions, and those stating clinicians’ prerogative to determine realistic chance of treatment success and not provide intervention considered medically inappropriate.

2254 Improving the quality and breadth of advance care planning discussions on gerontology wards in an acute London trust

Abstract Introduction Advance care planning (ACP) offers people the opportunity to plan their future care whilst they have capacity to do so and is supported by national guidance. Decisions regarding future care are more likely to be individualised and holistic when patients and their significant others are involved. This QI project aimed to address this by increasing the frequency of ACP discussions being offered and recorded on gerontology wards in an acute London Trust. Method A multi-professional steering group was established to improve ACP using PDSA methodology. A new ACP toolkit, training programme and electronic flowsheet (within the hospital’s patient record system) were implemented. ACP documentation quality was audited on gerontology wards pre and post implementation (over one to four months respectively). Data was compared using Pearson’s Chi-squared test. Results ACP flowsheets were completed by junior and senior doctors, and clinical nurse specialists in frailty and palliative medicine. The initial audit found disparity between documented topics of ACP conversations, with cardiopulmonary resuscitation recommendations being most discussed. Post implementation, 24 ACP flowsheets were reviewed, showing that more ACP topics were documented where these conversations were had; preferred place of death increased from 24% to 60% (p 0.011); treatment escalation plan increased from 41% to 75% (p 0.014); preferred place of care increased from 59% to 71% (p 0.066). Topics not showing significant improvement in documentation (despite inclusion in the flowsheet) were spiritual needs, information needs and prognostic discussion, broader social needs and what was most important to the patient. Conclusion The implementation of an electronic ACP flowsheet improved documented ACP conversations in some topics, guiding healthcare professionals to deliver care that aligns with peoples’ wishes and preferences. Documented conversations became easier to access, review and audit. Work is still needed to promote ACP conversations being centralised around what matters most to patients.

2317 Geriatrician-led perioperative services: an example of value-based care

Abstract Background Perioperative services must adapt to the needs of an increasingly older surgical population. Perioperative medicine for Older People undergoing Surgery (POPS) services integrate geriatric medicine teams into surgical pathways to provide quality and cost-effective medical care. This project aims to examine value-based outcomes (clinical and financial impact) of embedding a POPS service at a district general hospital. Methods Following a period of implementation on an acute Trauma and Orthopaedic (T&O) ward, a two-week pilot was undertaken. All emergency fragility fracture admissions aged over 65 years with Clinical Frailty Scores (CFS) of ≥5 were included. Patients with hip fractures were excluded. The POPS service provided medical consultation, medicine rationalisation, proactive treatment escalation planning and shared decision making, as well as leading multidisciplinary team meetings. Outcome metrics: geriatric medicine consults, medical emergency team (MET)/cardiac arrest calls, staff/patient satisfaction and clinical coding. The REDUCE trial cost calculator was used to estimate savings. Results 35 patients were included, mean age 84 years, mean CFS score 7. Ward MET calls and cardiac arrest calls were reduced from a weekly average of 2.5 to 0, and weekly referrals to geriatric medicine reduced from 3 to 0. Experience-based design surveys identified thematic improvements relating to leadership, communication, dignity and respect. Improved quality of documentation resulted in the comorbidity score tariff increasing from £3325 to £6096 per patient. For services introduced by POPS including Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment and delirium assessments, the REDUCE trial cost calculator estimated an additional saving of £2926 per patient totalling hospital savings of £2 million per year (for an estimated 700 patients per year). Conclusion Implementation of a POPS service at a district general hospital can lead to cost savings, improved patient and staff experience, and improved clinical outcomes within a sustainable workforce model.

766 Audit of Stratified Treatment Escalation Plan Completion and DNACPR in Patients with Femoral Fractures – 4th Cycle

766 Audit of Stratified Treatment Escalation Plan Completion and DNACPR in Patients with Femoral Fractures – 4th Cycle

Quality improvement: treatment escalation plans in oncology

Treatment escalation plans (TEPs) are increasingly appreciated tools in modern hospital medicine. It records and advises on the appropriate escalation of care for our patients, often when those of us...

Do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation (DNACPR) and treatment escalation plan (TEP) decisions: Developing a trust-wide audit

Do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation (DNACPR) and treatment escalation plan (TEP) decisions: Developing a trust-wide audit

Improving completion of treatment escalation plans on acute medical unit- a quality improvement project

Improving completion of treatment escalation plans on acute medical unit- a quality improvement project

Time to blood pressure control and predictors among patients receiving integrated treatment for hypertension and HIV based on an adapted WHO HEARTS implementation strategy at a large urban HIV clinic in Uganda

In this cohort study, we determined time to blood pressure (BP) control and its predictors among hypertensive PLHIV enrolled in integrated hypertension-HIV care based on the World Health Organization (WHO) HEARTS strategy at Mulago Immunosuppression Clinic in Uganda. From August 2019 to March 2020, we enrolled hypertensive PLHIV aged ≥\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$\\ge$$\\end{document}18 years and initiated Amlodipine 5 mg mono-therapy for BP (140–159)/(90–99) mmHg or Amlodipine 5 mg/Valsartan 80 mg duo-therapy for BP ≥ 160/90 mmHg. Patients were followed with a treatment escalation plan until BP control, defined as BP < 140/90 mmHg. We used Cox proportional hazards models to identify predictors of time to BP control. Of 877 PLHIV enrolled (mean age 50.4 years, 62.1% female), 30% received mono-therapy and 70% received duo-therapy. In the monotherapy group, 66%, 88% and 96% attained BP control in the first, second and third months, respectively. For patients on duo-therapy, 56%, 83%, 88% and 90% achieved BP control in the first, second, third, and fourth months, respectively. In adjusted Cox proportional hazard analysis, higher systolic BP (aHR 0.995, 95% CI 0.989-0.999) and baseline ART tenofovir/lamivudine/efavirenz (aHR 0.764, 95% CI 0.637–0.917) were associated with longer time to BP control, while being on ART for >10 years was associated with a shorter time to BP control (aHR 1.456, 95% CI 1.126–1.883). The WHO HEARTS strategy was effective at achieving timely BP control among PLHIV. Additionally, monotherapy anti-hypertensive treatment for stage I hypertension is a viable option to achieve BP control and limit pill burden in resource limited HIV care settings.

1882 Treatment Escalation Plans (TEP): benefits in adult in-patient facilities

Abstract Introduction Treatment escalation plans (TEP) guide level of life sustaining therapeutic interventions that should occur for each patient admitted to hospital and can prevent inappropriate and undignified interventions. However, implementation of TEP in routine clinical practise has been ad hoc partly due to the paucity of literature on their benefits. Our aim was to systematically review the literature to ascertain the use and benefits of TEP in adults. Methods A systematic search for studies reporting TEP use were performed in the databases OVID Medline, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science. Search terms were ‘Treatment Escalation Plan’ Treatment Limitation, ‘Therapy Escalation’, ‘Escalation of Care’, ‘Palliative’, End of Life’, ‘Advanced Care Plan’. Exclusion criteria included studies prior to 2007, systematic reviews, case reports and letters. Results 468 records were retrieved, 117 duplicates removed, 351 records were screened. 302 were excluded by date or relevance. Of 49 eligible records, 39 were excluded by criteria or unavailability of full text articles. 10 Studies using case control and quality improvement methodology conducted between 2010-2022 involving 1614 patients were subject to a narrative review. 8 different TEP proformas were used. All studies reported an increase in TEP use across all clinical settings and after each PDSA intervention ranging from 78%-100%. TEP reduced the frequency of non-beneficial interventions and was associated with an average saving of £220 per patient. Conclusions TEP lead to more frequent and proactive discussions with patients on ceilings of care and provide clear guidance to clinical staff out of hours, facilitate patient handover over successive shifts and enable proactive discussions with critical care. We identified the need for TEP to be successfully implemented in a unified manner across all healthcare facilities in order to improve patient care, reduce the burden of non-beneficial interventions and align with the NHS Long Term Plan.

2008 Improving the documentation of Treatment Escalation Plans in patients &amp;gt;65yo admitted under the care of orthopaedics

Abstract Introduction Treatment Escalation Plans (TEPs) are helpful tools that reduce un-necessary treatment burden, improve patient experience and follow the principles of realistic medicine. This is relevant in orthopaedics where a high percentage of the patients are frail, co-morbid, and would benefit from clear and realistic care plans. We aim to improve TEP completion to &amp;gt;50% of orthopaedic patients, over the age of 65yrs old, in three trauma wards at the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh by August 2023. Methods We sampled three patient notes on each ward twice weekly from May – August 2023, noting whether TEPs were present, if it was consultant endorsed or provisional, and what key sections were completed (resuscitation, treatment goals and communication). To be included, the patient had to ≥65 and under orthopaedics. Process mapping demonstrated 2 key targets- admission clerk-in and registrar review. PDSA 1 involved creating a prompt for documenting TEPs on FY1 clerk-in which was added to the admission proforma folder and displayed as posters. PDSA 2 was a teaching session designed for orthopaedic registrars and other team members about TEP conversations. Results Pre-intervention data, demonstrated a median of 28% of orthopaedic patients ≥65yo have a TEP. Of the completed TEPs: 88% solely consisted of a resuscitation decision; 33% had treatment goals, 33% communication; and 0% of TEPs were endorsed. After PDSA 2; median TEP completion increased to 33%. Of the completed TEPs; none had only a resus decision, 100% have treatment goals; 100% communication, and 67% are endorsed. Conclusions Our studies have demonstrated that education and proforma changes have increased TEP documentation rate, although not to our projected target. However importantly, the percentage of TEPs that contain goals, document communication and consultant endorsement has improved significantly. This project is ongoing with planned further PDSA cycles.

1689 Establishing an oncogeriatric multi-disciplinary team (MDT) and accompanying clinic at a DGH in Somerset

Abstract Introduction Recent studies show the use of comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) in older patients with cancer can result in better quality of life, improved treatment tolerance and reduced hospital admissions, leading to international consensus that CGA should be routinely included in care. We have piloted an onco-geriatric MDT, consisting of oncologists, geriatricians and therapy input, alongside a rapid-access geriatrician-led onco-geriatric clinic Method Referrals were invited from oncologists for older patients (&amp;gt;70) with a new diagnosis of cancer, with expected prognosis of more than 1 year, about whom they had concerns regarding their ability to undergo radical treatment due to co-morbidities, falls, cognitive impairment or social isolation. A CGA was completed prior to starting radical treatment in most cases. Performance status, Rockwood frailty score (RFS) and G8 score were calculated for all patients. Results During the 24-week trial period, an MDT and clinic has run every week. A total of 32 patients have been discussed at MDT, with 22 seen in clinic, from cancer sites including colorectal, breast, urological and ovarian. Patient seen in clinic had an average RFS of 4.5 and G8 score of 13. All patients have seen a geriatrician, with most also seeing our physiotherapist. Interventions included medication review and rationalisation, anaemia review and treatment, referral to specialist memory and continence services, blood pressure optimisation and completion of a treatment escalation plan. Conclusions Feedback from patients attending the clinic has been resoundingly positive, with 100% of patients rating their service experience as “good” or “very good” and praising the time to talk about their health as a whole. Follow up of clinic patients is in progress, identifying emergency admissions alongside treatment toxicities and complications within this group, as well as whether G8 is an appropriate screening tool for clinic review, to secure the long-term future of the service.

Intensive care following in-hospital cardiac arrest / periarrest calls—experience from one Scottish hospital

BackgroundIn-hospital cardiac arrest/periarrest is a recognised trigger for consideration of admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). We aimed to investigate the rates of ICU admission following in-hospital cardiac arrest/periarrest, evaluate the outcomes of such patients and assess whether anticipatory care planning had taken place prior to the adult resuscitation team being called.MethodsAnalysis of all referrals to the ICU page-holder within our district general hospital is between 1st November 2018 and 31st May 2019. From this, the frequency of adult resuscitation team calls was determined. Case notes were then reviewed to determine details of the events, patient outcomes and the use of anticipatory care planning tools on wards.ResultsOf the 506 referrals to the ICU page-holder, 141 (27.9%) were adult resuscitation team calls (114 periarrests and 27 cardiac arrests). Twelve patients were excluded due to health records being unavailable. Admission rates to ICU were low — 17.4% for cardiac arrests (4/23 patients), 5.7% (6/106) following periarrest. The primary reason for not admitting to ICU was patients being “too well” at the time of review (78/129 — 60.5%). Prior to adult resuscitation team call, treatment escalation plans had been completed in 27.9% (36/129) with Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) forms present in 15.5% of cases (20/129). Four cardiac arrest calls were made in the presence of a valid DNACPR form, frequently due to a lack of awareness of the patient’s resuscitation status.ConclusionsThis study highlights the significant workload for the ICU page-holder brought about by adult resuscitation team calls. There is a low admission rate from these calls, and, at the time of resuscitation team call, anticipatory planning is frequently either incomplete or poorly communicated. Addressing these issues requires a collaborative approach between ICU and non-ICU physicians and highlights the need for larger studies to develop scoring systems to aid objective admission decision-making.

Implementing a Digital Deteriorating Patient Pathway to improve the safety and effectiveness of care of the adult deteriorating patient.

Identification, escalation and clinical review of the deteriorating patient is essential for a safe and effective hospital. We present a deteriorating patient pathway developed within our electronic patient record, including implementation of a digital escalation and senior review process, triggered from a logic algorithm and vital signs. The pathway is activated by an average 43 patients per day with median mortality of 13.3%. Our Trust has seen a significant improvement in escalation and senior review and increased use of treatment escalation plans. The pathway has facilitated a cultural shift in the Trust towards the deteriorating patient. The new pathway is transferrable to both other digital Trusts as well as maternity and paediatric practice.

Improving Completion Rates of Treatment Escalation Plan (TEP) in a London Teaching Hospital: A Quality Improvement Study.

Background Treatment escalation plans (TEPs) provide enhanced clarity in planning appropriate decision-making in the management of deteriorating patients by explicitly defining a limit of care. These decisions are discussed with patients or their relatives and mutually agreed upon. We aimed to improve staff adherence to the completion of TEPs upon the admission of patients to the orthopedics wards in a London teaching hospital. Methods This study employed the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) methodology to investigate the efficacy of interventions implemented within a hospital setting for adult inpatients receiving orthopedic treatment. The approach adopted was cross-sectional, where a comprehensive audit was conducted on all adult inpatients admitted to the hospital. The initial cycle of the study was conducted in March 2022, followed by the implementation of interventions in the form of an internal algorithm. Subsequently, the second cycle of the study was conducted in November 2022. Results We sampled a total of 50 patients (PDSA 1, n=27; PDSA 2, n=23). Following the implementation of a designated local TEP pathway, the proportion of patients with incomplete TEPs fell from 30.4% (n=7, PDSA Cycle 1) to 11.76% (n=2, PDSA Cycle 2). Conclusions The study has demonstrated that interventions such as institutional algorithms and departmental meetings can be useful in improving the adherence of staff to complete TEPs. Ongoing training and education can help overcome some of the barriers to TEP completion.