Treatment-emergent Adverse Events Research Articles

Surufatinib plus toripalimab combined with etoposide and cisplatin as first-line treatment in advanced small-cell lung cancer patients: a phase Ib/II trial

There is still room for improvement in first-line treatment of advanced small cell lung cancer (SCLC). This trial firstly investigated efficacy and safety of antiangiogenic therapy (surufatinib) (200 mg, qd, po) plus anti-PD-1 treatment (toripalimab) (240 mg, d1, ivdrip) combined with etoposide (100 mg/m², d1-d3, iv, drip) and cisplatin (25 mg/m², d1-d3, ivdrip) for advanced SCLC as first-line treatment, which has been registered on ClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier NCT04996771. The four-drug regimen was conducted q3w for 4 cycles with maintenance therapy of surufatinib and toripalimab. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary end points included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS) and safety. All of the 38 patients were enrolled for safety analysis, while only 35 patients were enrolled for efficacy analysis since loss of efficacy evaluation in 3 cases after treatment. After a median follow-up of 21.3 months, the ORR was 97.1% (34/35), and the DCR and the tumor shrinkage rate were both 100% (35/35). The median PFS was 6.9 months (95% CI: 4.6 m–9.2 m) and the median OS was 21.1 months (95% CI: 12.1 m–30.1 m). The 12-month, 18-month, and 24-month OS rates were 66.94%, 51.39% and 38.54%. The occurrence rate of grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was 63.2% (24/38), including neutrophil count decreased (31.6%, 12/38), white blood cell count decreased (23.7%, 9/38) and platelet count decreased (10.5%, 4/38). No unexpected adverse events occurred. This novel four-drug regimen (surufatinib, toripalimab, etoposide plus cisplatin) revealed impressive therapeutic efficacy and tolerable toxicities.

Population pharmacokinetics and exposure-response relationships of maribavir in transplant recipients with cytomegalovirus infection.

Maribavir is approved for management of post-transplant cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections refractory and/or resistant to CMV therapies at a dose of 400mg twice daily (BID). Population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) and exposure-response analyses were conducted to support the appropriateness of 400mg BID dosing. A PopPK model was developed using non-linear mixed-effects modeling with pooled maribavir plasma concentration-time data from phase 1 and 2 studies (from 100mg up to 1200mg as single or repeated doses) and the phase 3 SOLSTICE study (400mg BID). Exposure-response analyses were performed for efficacy, safety, and viral resistance based on data collected in the SOLSTICE study. Maribavir PK after oral administration was adequately described by a two-compartment model with first-order elimination, first-order absorption, and an absorption lag-time. There was no evidence that maribavir PK was affected by age, sex, race, diarrhea, vomiting, disease characteristics, or concomitant use of histamine H2 blockers, or proton pump inhibitors. In the SOLSTICE study, higher maribavir exposure was not associated with increased probability of achieving CMV DNA viremia clearance, nor with reduced probability of treatment-emergent maribavir-resistant CMV mutations. A statistically significant association with maribavir exposure was identified for taste disturbance, fatigue, and treatment-emergent serious adverse events, while transplant type, enrollment region, CMV DNA level at baseline, and/or CMV resistance at baseline were identified as additional risk factors for these safety outcomes. In conclusion, the findings of these PopPK and exposure-response analyses provide further support for the recommended maribavir dose of 400mg BID.

Efficacy and Safety of Tofacitinib in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis or Ankylosing Spondylitis by Cigarette Smoking Status.

Routine care studies of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS) demonstrated attenuated responses to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in current/past versus never smokers. This post hoc analysis assessed tofacitinib efficacy and safety in patients with PsA or AS by cigarette smoking status at trial screening. Pooled data from phase 3 and long-term extension (safety only) PsA trials and phase2 and 3 AS trials were assessed by current/past versus never smoker status. Analysis included efficacy and safety data for tofacitinib 5 (PsA/AS) and 10(PsA only) mg twicedaily (BID) or placebo, and safety data in AS for tofacitinib 2 and 10 mg BID. Efficacy outcomes included American College of Rheumatology ≥ 50% responses (ACR50) and minimal disease activity (MDA) responses to month (M)6/M3 (tofacitinib/placebo) in PsA; and ≥ 40% improvement in Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society responses (ASAS40) and AS Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) < 2.1 responses to week (W)16 in AS. Safety was assessed to M48/W48 (PsA/AS), adjusted for treatment/smoking status/median body mass index (BMI) status/sex/trial/treatment-smoking status interaction. PsA/AS cohorts included 342/178 current/past and 572/194 never smokers. Tofacitinib efficacy was generally greater versus placebo to M3/W6 (PsA/AS), and comparable in current/past and never smokers to M6/W16 (PsA/AS). In patients receiving ≥ 1tofacitinib dose, adjusted treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE)/serious AE (SAE)/discontinuation due to AE incidence rates (IRs) to M48 in PsA were higher in current/past versus never smokers; adjusted IRs to W48 in AS were higher in current/past versus never smokers for TEAEs, but similar for SAEs/discontinuation due to AEs. In both patients with PsA and AS, tofacitinib efficacy was greater versus placebo, and comparable across smoking categories. Adjusted IRs were higher in current/past versus never smokers for TEAEs, SAEs, discontinuation due to AEs in PsA, and for TEAEs in AS, complementing reports of associations between smoking and comorbidities in spondyloarthritis. Findings support increased surveillance/caution for patients with PsA or AS with smoking history. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01877668/NCT01882439/NCT03486457/NCT01976364/NCT01786668/NCT03502616.

Epcoritamab in relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma: 2-year follow-up from the pivotal EPCORE NHL-1 trial.

Primary results (median follow-up, 10.7 months) from the pivotal EPCORE® NHL-1 study in relapsed or refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) demonstrated deep, durable responses with epcoritamab, a CD3xCD20 bispecific antibody, when used as monotherapy. We report long-term efficacy and safety results in patients with LBCL (N = 157; 25.1-month median follow-up). As of April 21, 2023, overall response rate was 63.1% and complete response (CR) rate was 40.1%. Estimated 24-month progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 27.8% and 44.6%, respectively. An estimated 64.2% of complete responders remained in CR at 24 months. Estimated 24-month PFS and OS rates among complete responders were 65.1% and 78.2%, respectively. Of 119 minimal residual disease (MRD)-evaluable patients, 45.4% had MRD negativity, which correlated with longer PFS and OS. CR rates were generally consistent across predefined subgroups: 36% prior chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, 32% primary refractory disease, and 37% International Prognostic Index ≥3. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were cytokine release syndrome (51.0%), pyrexia (24.8%), fatigue (24.2%), and neutropenia (23.6%). These results underscore the long-term benefit of epcoritamab for treating R/R LBCL with deep responses across subgroups, including patients with hard-to-treat disease and expected poor prognosis (ClinicalTrials.gov Registration: NCT03625037).

Efficacy and Safety of Etrasimod in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis in Japan: Data from the Phase 3 ELEVATE UC 12 and ELEVATE UC 40 JAPAN Trials

Introduction: Etrasimod is an oral, once-daily (QD), selective sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P)1,4,5 receptor modulator for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC). Here, we report the primary analysis of a phase 3 trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of etrasimod in patients from Japan with moderately to severely active UC. Methods: Patients from Japan who completed the 12-week ELEVATE UC 12 induction trial could enroll in the 40-week ELEVATE UC 40 JAPAN maintenance trial for a combined 52-week treatment period. Patients in this Japan cohort continued their baseline assigned treatment (etrasimod 2 mg QD or placebo) from ELEVATE UC 12. Efficacy was assessed at week 12 and week 52. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) pooled from both trials were assessed up to 52 weeks of exposure. Results: The Japan cohort comprised 32 and 16 patients who received etrasimod and placebo, respectively. A numerically greater proportion of patients who received etrasimod versus placebo achieved clinical remission at week 12 (etrasimod: 14.3%; placebo: 7.1%) and week 52 (etrasimod: 25.0%; placebo: 7.1%); a similar trend was observed for all key secondary efficacy endpoints. TEAEs occurred in 84.4% (27/32) and 62.5% (10/16) of patients who received etrasimod and placebo, respectively. No new safety signals were detected. Conclusion: In these induction and maintenance trials evaluating etrasimod in patients from Japan with UC, numerically higher proportions of patients who received etrasimod versus placebo achieved efficacy endpoints. Efficacy and safety findings were consistent with those from the global ELEVATE UC trial populations.

Concentration-QTc analysis of soticlestat in healthy adults: An alternative to a thorough QT study.

This study aimed to examine the cardiac and overall safety and pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles of soticlestat (TAK-935), an oral, first-in-class selective cholesterol 24-hydroxylase inhibitor. Data came from a randomised, phase 1 study of soticlestat in 33 healthy Japanese adults (NCT04461483); 24 adults in Part 1 (single-dose soticlestat 200-1200 mg or placebo) and 9 in Part 2 (soticlestat 100-300 mg twice daily or placebo for 21 days). PK sample collection was paired with 12-lead electrocardiogram data from continuous Holter recordings. The concentration-QTc relationship was analysed using a linear mixed-effects model. QTc prolongation safety margins were determined for two scenarios of calculated high clinical exposures: scenario 1 (NCT05064449) involved coadministration of single-dose soticlestat 300 mg with itraconazole or mefenamic acid and scenario 2 (NCT05098054) involved single-dose soticlestat 300 mg administration in participants with mild/moderate hepatic impairment (implementing a 3-fold dose reduction for moderate severity). Based on concentration-QTc analysis, placebo-corrected change-from-baseline QT values (90% confidence intervals), corrected for heart rate (Fridericia's method), were 0.94 ms (-2.35, 4.23) for soticlestat and 0.63 ms (-3.15, 4.41) for its N-oxide metabolite plasma concentrations at therapeutic doses (soticlestat 300 mg twice daily); safety margins were >2-fold for scenarios of calculated high clinical exposures. No (Part 1) and five (83.3%; Part 2) participants experienced treatment-emergent adverse events (all mild). There was no evidence for QT prolongation with soticlestat at therapeutic doses or in two scenarios of high clinical exposures, which resulted in regulatory agencies waiving requirements of a thorough QT study. Safety/PK findings aligned with previous soticlestat clinical studies.

Abstract C162: Prespecified interim analysis of the DARolutamide ObservationaL (DAROL) study in Black/African American patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC)

Abstract Introduction: Black/African American (B/AA) men are disproportionately affected by prostate cancer, having higher incidence and mortality rates compared with other ethnic/racial populations. Darolutamide (DARO) is a structurally distinct and highly potent androgen receptor inhibitor with low blood–brain barrier penetration and limited potential for drug–drug interactions. In ARAMIS (NCT02200614; phase 3), DARO significantly improved metastasis- free survival (MFS) by ∼2 years and reduced the risk of death by 31% vs placebo in patients with nmCRPC, with favorable tolerability. The DAROL study (NCT04122976) is assessing the real- world safety and effectiveness of DARO in patients with nmCRPC. Here we report a subgroup analysis of B/AA patients from the prespecified third interim analysis (IA3). Methods: DAROL is an ongoing, global, open-label, single-arm, non-interventional study in patients aged ≥18 years with nmCRPC for whom the decision to be treated with DARO was decided pre-enrollment. The primary endpoint is safety, including incidence and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Secondary endpoints include MFS, overall survival (OS), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression, and PSA response. IA3 was conducted when 550 patients completed ≥6 months of treatment (data cut-off July 17, 2023). Results: Of 550 patients, 199 (36%)/191 (35%)/152 (28%)/8 (2%) were from Europe/North America/Asia Pacific/Latin America, respectively. All 23 B/AA patients were from North America and represented 12% of this cohort. At baseline, PSA levels (median 4.2 ng/mL vs 4.0 ng/mL) and PSA doubling time (median 5.9 months vs 5.3 months) were similar in the B/AA and overall DAROL population, whereas B/AA patients were generally younger than the overall population (median 74 [range 49–94] vs 79 [range 29–98] years, respectively) with proportionately fewer patients aged ≥75 yrs (12 [52%] vs 387 [70%]), fewer B/AA patients (33%) had a Gleason score ≥8 vs the overall population (53%), and proportionally more B/AA patients (94%) had ECOG PS 0 vs the overall population (64%). Consistent with the DAROL IA3 overall population, DARO showed a favorable safety profile in the B/AA subgroup, and TEAEs were mostly grade 1/2. In the DAROL IA3 overall population, the proportion of patients who achieved a 90% reduction in PSA from baseline was 54%, while MFS and OS rates at 2 years were 78% and 88%, respectively. Effectiveness and safety outcomes for the B/AA subgroup will be presented. Conclusion: Findings from the DAROL IA3 B/AA subgroup were similar to the overall population and consistent with the favorable efficacy and safety profile of DARO observed in the ARAMIS B/AA subgroup and overall population. Citation Format: Evan Y. Yu, Christopher Pieczonka, Hiroyoshi Suzuki, Alberto Briganti, Murilo Luz, Declan Murphy, Patrick Adorjan, Mercedeh Ghadessi, Frank Verholen, Andrew J. Armstrong. Prespecified interim analysis of the DARolutamide ObservationaL (DAROL) study in Black/African American patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 17th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2024 Sep 21-24; Los Angeles, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2024;33(9 Suppl):Abstract nr C162.

Abstract C160: Baseline characteristics, safety, and efficacy of Radium-223 in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer by race: Insights from the REASSURE US subset

Abstract Background: REASSURE (NCT02141438) is a global, prospective, single-arm, observational study of Ra-223 use in patients with mCRPC with bone metastases within routine clinical settings. Using data from the second planned interim analysis, we compared baseline characteristics, survival, and safety outcomes among White, Black, and Asian patients treated with Ra-223 in the US subset of REASSURE. Methods: In this descriptive analysis (data collection 8-20-2014 to 3-20-2019), we examined baseline characteristics, OS, and safety outcomes for the US subset enrolled into REASSURE stratified by race (White, Black, Asian). Results: Of the 498 men in the US subset, 414 (83.1%) reported as White, 58 (11.7%) as Black, and 10 (2.0%) as Asian; race was not reported for 16 (3.2%) patients. Median age at study entry was 74.0, 69.5, and 71.0 years for White, Black, and Asian men, respectively. The proportion of patients whose prostate cancer was American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 7th edition stage III or IV at initial diagnosis was 45.2%, 58.6%, and 60.0% for White, Black, and Asian patients, respectively. The proportion of patients who completed 6 Ra-223 injections was similar across groups. Median duration of observation from the start of Ra-223 treatment was 11.3 months (range 0.4-41.3 months) for White patients, 14.9 months (range 0.7-39.1 months) for Black patients, and 20.5 months (range 4-27.7 months) for Asian patients. Median OS for White, Black, and Asian patients was 17.3 months (95% CI, 15.2-19.2 months), 19.5 months (95% CI, 12.9-27.1 months), and 21.8 months (95% CI, 3.58 months-not applicable), respectively. Any treatment-emergent drug related AE, treatment-emergent SAE, or drug-related SAE occurred in 45.2%, 41.4%, and 10.0% of White, Black, and Asian patients, respectively. Any-grade and grade ≥3 drug-related hematological TEAEs occurred in 8.4% and 5.3% of White patients, respectively, 15.5% and 12.1% of Black patients, respectively, and were not observed in Asian patients. Incidence of bone fractures was 4.1%, 3.4%, and 0% in White, Black and Asian patients respectively. Conclusions: This descriptive analysis of REASSURE found that Black patients were younger and presented with later-stage disease at diagnosis compared with White patients. A trend toward longer OS was seen in Black and Asian patients compared with White patients. AEs occurred at similar rates among groups. Drug-related hematological TEAEs, which have been reported with Ra-223 treatment, were more common in Black patients compared with White and Asian patients. Given the very small number of Asian patients enrolled in REASSURE, comparisons with this group should be interpreted with caution. Citation Format: Peter S. Conti, Oliver Sartor, Mary-Ellen Taplin, Daniel Y. Song, Saby George, Jeffrey Tomaszewski, John Sylvester, Constantine Mantz, Robert W. Given, Robert Brookland, Jeff Meltzer, Matthew J. Korn, Richard Andres, Svetlana Babajanyan, Celestia Higano. Baseline characteristics, safety, and efficacy of Radium-223 in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer by race: Insights from the REASSURE US subset [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 17th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2024 Sep 21-24; Los Angeles, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2024;33(9 Suppl):Abstract nr C160.

Magrolimab plus rituximab with or without chemotherapy in patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

AbstractPatients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) ineligible for available salvage therapies have limited options for long-term disease control, necessitating novel treatments. Previously, magrolimab (anti–cluster-of-differentiation-47 antibody) plus rituximab (M+R) demonstrated ability to induce complete responses (CR) in R/R DLBCL. Here, we report 3-year follow-up data from this phase 1b/2 study assessing long-term safety and efficacy of M+R, and initial safety and efficacy of M+R plus gemcitabine-oxaliplatin (M+R-GemOx), in R/R DLBCL. After magrolimab priming, 4 groups of patients received M+R, 10 to 45 mg/kg magrolimab with 375 mg/m2 rituximab; patients receiving M+R-GemOx received 30 or 45 mg/kg magrolimab with 375 mg/m2 rituximab, 1000 mg/m2 gemcitabine, and 100 mg/m2 oxaliplatin. Primary end points were treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and objective response rate (ORR). Secondary end points included duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Of 132 patients treated, 99 received M+R and 33 received M+R-GemOx. Most common any-grade TEAEs were fatigue (M+R, 40%; M+R-GemOx, 70%), infusion-related reactions (M+R, 39%), or anemia (M+R-GemOx, 70%). Treatment-related TEAEs led to magrolimab discontinuation in 7% (M+R) and 6% (M+R-GemOx). One death was considered treatment related (M+R-GemOx, colitis). M+R ORR was 24% (CR, 12%), and median DOR was 9.3 months. Median PFS and OS were 1.8 and 9.2 months, respectively. M+R-GemOx ORR was 52% (CR, 39%); 12-month DOR rate was 66.6% (95% confidence interval, 33.1-86.1). Median PFS and OS were 3.9 months and not reached, respectively. These results demonstrate that M+R with/without GemOx is well tolerated, and M+R-GemOx has clinical activity in patients with R/R DLBCL. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02953509.

Harms with placebo in trials of biological therapies and small molecules as induction therapy in inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Randomised placebo-controlled trials are the gold standard to assess novel drugs in ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. However, there might be risks associated with receiving placebo. We aimed to examine the harms associated with receiving placebo in trials of licensed biologics and small molecules for the induction of remission in ulcerative colitis and luminal Crohn's disease in a meta-analysis. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Embase Classic, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from database inception to May 30, 2024, for randomised placebo-controlled trials of licensed biologics and small molecules for induction of remission in adults (≥18 years) with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis or luminal Crohn's disease reporting data on adverse events over a minimum treatment period of 4 weeks. There were no prespecified study exclusion criteria. We extracted summary data and pooled data using a random-effects model for any treatment-emergent adverse event, any drug-related adverse event, infection, worsening of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) activity, withdrawal due to adverse events, serious adverse events, serious infection, serious worsening of IBD activity, or venous thromboembolic events (VTEs), reporting relative risks (RRs) with 95% CIs. The protocol for this meta-analysis was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024527341). The search identified 10 826 citations, of which 47 trials including 20 987 patients (14 267 [68·0%] receiving active drug and 6720 [32·0%] receiving placebo) were eligible. The risk of any treatment-emergent adverse event was no different with active drug than with placebo (7660/14 267 [53·7%] patients on active drug vs 3758/6720 [55·9%] on placebo; RR 0·97, 95% CI 0·94-1·00; I2 =36%). However, the risks of worsening of IBD activity (563/13 473 [4·2%] vs 530/6252 [8·5%]; 0·48, 0·40-0·59; I2 =54%), withdrawal due to adverse event (401/13 363 [3·0%] vs 299/6267 [4·8%]; 0·62, 0·48-0·79; I2 =46%), serious adverse event (682/14 267 [4·8%] vs 483/6720 [7·2%]; 0·69, 0·59-0·80; I2 =30%), serious infection (140/14 194 [1·0%] vs 91/6647 [1·4%]; 0·67, 0·50-0·89; I2 =0%), serious worsening of IBD activity (187/11 271 [1·7%] vs 189/5056 [3·7%]; 0·45, 0·34-0·60; I2 =27%), or VTEs (13/7542 [0·2%] vs 12/2981 [0·4%]; 0·45, 0·21-0·94; I2 =0%) were all significantly lower with active drug than placebo. Numbers needed to treat with active drug to avoid these potentially serious adverse events ranged from 23 for worsening of IBD activity to 452 for VTEs. 27 randomised controlled trials were judged as low risk of bias across all domains. Patients with moderately to severely active IBD receiving placebo are more likely to experience significant worsening of IBD activity and some serious adverse events, which might relate to a reduction in risk of these events with active drug. Patients should be counselled about these potential harms, and alternative trial designs to mitigate these harms should be considered. None.

Harms with placebo in trials of biological therapies and small molecules as maintenance therapy in inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Randomised placebo-controlled trials for the induction of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remission involve potential harms to those receiving placebo. Whether these harms are also apparent with placebo during maintenance of remission trials in IBD is unclear. We aimed to examine the potential harms associated with receiving placebo in trials of licensed biologics and small molecules for maintenance of remission of ulcerative colitis and luminal Crohn's disease in a meta-analysis. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched several medical literature databases including MEDLINE (from Jan 1, 1946, to May 31, 2024), Embase and Embase Classic (Jan 1, 1947, to May 31, 2024), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from database inception to May 31, 2024, for randomised placebo-controlled trials of licensed biologics and small molecules for maintenance of remission in adults with IBD reporting data on adverse events over a period of 20 weeks or more. There were no language restrictions or prespecified exclusion criteria. We extracted summary data and pooled data using a random-effects model for any treatment-emergent adverse event, drug-related adverse event, infection, worsening of IBD activity, withdrawal due to adverse events, serious adverse events, serious infection, serious worsening of IBD activity, or venous thromboembolic events, reporting relative risks (RRs) for placebo versus active drug with 95% CIs for each outcomes. The protocol for this meta-analysis was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024542624). Our search identified 10 826 citations, of which 45 trials including 16 562 patients (10 319 [62·3%] receiving active drug and 6243 [37·7%] placebo) were eligible. The risks of any treatment-emergent adverse event (7297/9546 [76·4%] patients on active drug vs 4415/5850 [75·5%] on placebo; RR 1·01, 95% CI 0·99-1·04; I2 =47%), serious infection (260/10 242 [2·5%] vs 155/6149 [2·5%]; 0·97, 0·79-1·19; I2 =0%), or venous thromboembolic event (12/4729 [0·3%] vs 9/2691 [0·3%]; 0·72, 0·31-1·66; I2 =0%) were not significantly lower with active drug than placebo. The risks of any infection (3208/8038 [39·9%] vs 1713/4809 [35·6%]; 1·14, 1·05-1·23; I2 =60%) or any drug-related adverse event (1094/2997 [36·5%] vs 609/1950 [31·2%]; 1·24, 1·02-1·50; I2 =75%) were higher with active drug than placebo. However, the risks of any worsening of IBD activity (1038/8090 [12·8%] vs 1181/5191 [22·8%]; 0·58, 0·52-0·64; I2 =40%), any withdrawal due to adverse events (610/10 282 [5·9%] vs 561/6207 [9·0%]; 0·71, 0·60-0·84; I2 =43%), any serious adverse events (1066/10 292 [10·4%] vs 742/6198 [12·0%]; 0·85, 0·77-0·94; I2 =17%), or any serious worsening of IBD activity (101/5707 [1·8%] vs 143/3640 [3·9%]; 0·55, 0·42-0·71; I2 =0%) were lower with active drug than placebo. 21 randomised controlled trials were judged as low risk of bias across all domains. In maintenance of remission trials in IBD, placebo was associated with some clinically significant potential harms. Patients should be counselled about these before participating in clinical trials and consideration given to alternative designs to test novel drugs in IBD. None.

Preliminary results from ASCENT-J02: a phase 1/2 study of sacituzumab govitecan in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors

BackgroundSacituzumab govitecan (SG) is a Trop-2–directed antibody–drug conjugate approved outside Japan for second-line and later metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC), based on the ASCENT study (NCT02574455). We report SG safety and efficacy in an open-label, phase 1/2 bridging study in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors (ASCENT-J02; NCT05101096; jRCT2031210346).MethodsPhase 1 was a standard 3 + 3 design. Patients received intravenous SG 6 mg/kg, escalating to 10 mg/kg, on Days 1 and 8 per 21-day cycle; primary endpoints were safety, incidence of dose-limiting toxicity/toxicities (DLTs), and determination of the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). In the multicohort phase 2 study, patients in the mTNBC cohort with previously treated disease received SG at the RP2D; primary endpoint was independent review committee (IRC)-assessed objective response rate (ORR; RECIST v1.1). Safety was a secondary endpoint.ResultsIn phase 1 (N = 15), one DLT (grade 3 elevated transaminases) occurred with SG 10 mg/kg; RP2D was SG 10 mg/kg regardless of UGT1A1 status. In phase 2, 36 patients with mTNBC received SG 10 mg/kg. At median follow-up of 6.1 months, IRC-assessed ORR was 25.0% (95% CI 12.1–42.2; P = 0.0077). Median progression-free survival was 5.6 months (95% CI 3.9–not reached [NR]); median overall survival was NR. No treatment-emergent adverse events led to discontinuation or death.ConclusionsSG RP2D was established as 10 mg/kg in Japanese patients. SG showed efficacy in Japanese patients with previously treated mTNBC, a manageable safety profile, and no new safety signals, consistent with the previous ASCENT study.

Clinical outcomes in lupus nephritis patients treated with belimumab in real-life setting: a retrospective comparative study in China.

The use of belimumab in treating lupus nephritis (LN) patients in China is still in its early stages. This retrospective comparative study aims to delineate the disease activity, associated therapies, clinical outcomes, and adverse events among LN patients treated with belimumab, reflecting real-world experience in southeastern China. From May 2020 to December 2023, 54 LN patients treated with belimumab and 42 LN patients treated with conventional therapy were enrolled. All patients had a follow-up period of more than 3 months. The general information, presenting clinical and laboratory data, and outcomes were collected and compared. At 3 months of belimumab treatment, compared to baseline, there was a decrease in proteinuria from 74.1% to 64.8% (p<0.001), a reduction in hematuria from 59.3% to 37.0% (p=0.008), and an increase in partial or complete renal response from 53.7% to 75.9% (p<0.001). The median SLEDAI score decreased from 10 to 5 (p<0.001), and the proportion of patients achieving low lupus disease activity state (LLDAS) increased from 11.11% to 16.67% (p<0.001) by the 3-month evaluation. Notably, there were significant reductions in oral corticosteroid dosages, with a median decrease from 30 to 17.5 mg/day (p<0.001) by 3 months, and the proportion of patients requiring >5 mg/day of steroids decreased from 88.89% at baseline to 79.07% at six months (p<0.001). Compared to the conventional therapy group, the belimumab group experienced a significant reduction in median steroid dosage and increased the proportion of patients achieving remission or LLDAS. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was significantly lower in the belimumab group (29.6% vs 52.4%, p=0.024). These findings support the potential of belimumab to improve renal and serological parameters, reduce disease activity, lessen corticosteroid dependence, and decrease the risk of TEAEs, demonstrating its safety and efficacy as an adjunct therapy in LN management.

Efficacy and safety of PARP inhibitor maintenance therapy for ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials.

The landscape of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor treatment for ovarian cancer (OC) is continually evolving. This research aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PARP inhibitors compared to placebo as a maintenance therapy for OC patients. We conducted a search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving the use of PARP inhibitors as maintenance therapy in OC patients, up to 16 June 2024. Data regarding progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), chemotherapy-free interval (CFI), time to first subsequent therapy or death (TFST), time to second subsequent therapy or death (TSST), and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were aggregated. Pooled hazard ratio (HR) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for PFS, OS, CFI, TFST, and TSST. Additionally, the relative risk (RR) and 95% CI for TEAEs were determined. This meta-analysis encompassed 20 RCTs involving 7,832 participants. The overall analysis demonstrated that maintenance therapy with PARP inhibitors led to significant improvements in PFS (HR: 0.398, 95% CI = 0.339-0.467, 95% PI = 0.219-0.724), OS (HR: 0.677, 95% CI = 0.582-0.788, 95% PI = 0.546-0.839), CFI (HR: 0.417, 95% CI = 0.368-0.472, 95% PI = 0.265-0.627), TFST (HR: 0.441, 95% CI = 0.391-0.498, 95% PI = 0.308-0.632), and TSST (HR: 0.574, 95% CI = 0.507-0.649, 95% PI = 0.488-0.674) compared with placebo. Subgroup analyses further indicated that PARP inhibitor maintenance treatment significantly improved PFS, regardless of homologous recombination status (all p < 0.05). However, the risks of any grade (RR = 1.046, 95% CI = 1.032-1.059, 95% PI = 1.028-1.055) and grade ≥3 TEAEs (RR = 2.931, 95% CI = 2.641-3.253, 95% PI = 2.128-3.792) were increased by PARP inhibitor maintenance therapy compared to placebo. Our research elucidated the benefits of maintenance therapy with PARP inhibitors in patients with OC, showing improvements in PFS, OS, CFI, TFST, and TSST. Vigilance regarding TEAEs is paramount for clinicians implementing PARP inhibitor maintenance therapy in clinical practice. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42024560286.

Safety profile of trastuzumab originator vs biosimilars: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

In the last decade trastuzumab biosimilars became more and more frequent. Among their uses, from several years, they have been available in Europe for the treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, as an alternative to Herceptin®. This meta-analysis aimed to analyze the available literature with particular focus on phase 3 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing adverse events between trastuzumab biosimilar and originator. A systematic review was conducted in Pubmed and Scopus to include all phase 3 RCTs related to trastuzumab in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer and published up to July 31, 2023. Of the 508 records identified, 14 articles were meta-analyzed for safety information, including serious treatment emergent adverse events, death-related adverse events, neutropenia, leukopenia, infections, increased ALT, increased AST, anti-drug antibody, and neutralizing antibody. Included patients had an early breast cancer (N=2,877) or a metastatic breast cancer (N=2,603). No significant difference in death-related adverse events was found for trastuzumab biosimilar and originator when evaluated for an early breast cancer in the neoadjuvant phase (Risk Ratio [RR], 1.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.47-3.59; I2 = 0%; p = 0.57) and overall (RR, 0.43; 95%CI, 0.11-1.66; I2 = 20%; p = 0.26), and for metastatic breast cancer (RR, 0.61; 95%CI, 0.30-1.26; I2 = 0%; p = 0.85). No difference was also observed for all other safety outcomes as in accordance with clinical studies necessary for the registration and approval of a biosimilar at a European level.

Roflumilast Cream, 0.15%, for Atopic Dermatitis in Adults and Children

Safe, effective, and well-tolerated topical treatment options available for long-term use in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) are limited and associated with low adherence rates. To evaluate efficacy and safety of once-daily roflumilast cream, 0.15%, vs vehicle cream in patients with AD. Two phase 3, randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled trials (Interventional Trial Evaluating Roflumilast Cream for the Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis 1 and 2 [INTEGUMENT-1 and INTEGUMENT-2]), included patients from sites in the US, Canada, and Poland. Participants were 6 years or older with mild to moderate AD based on Validated Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (assessed on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 [clear] to 4 [severe]). Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive roflumilast cream, 0.15%, or vehicle cream once daily for 4 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis success at week 4, defined as a score of 0 or 1 plus at least a 2-grade improvement from baseline. Secondary end points included Eczema Area and Severity Index and Worst Itch Numeric Rating Scale. Safety and local tolerability were also evaluated. Among 1337 patients (654 patients in INTEGUMENT-1 and 683 patients in INTEGUMENT-2), the mean (SD) age was 27.7 (19.2) years, and 761 participants (56.9%) were female. The mean body surface area involved was 13.6% (SD = 11.6%; range, 3.0% to 88.0%). Significantly more patients treated with roflumilast than vehicle achieved the primary end point (INTEGUMENT-1: 32.0% vs 15.2%, respectively; P < .001; INTEGUMENT-2: 28.9% vs 12.0%, respectively; P < .001). At week 4, statistically significant differences favoring roflumilast also occurred for the achievement of at least 75% reduction in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (INTEGUMENT-1: 43.2% vs 22.0%, respectively; P < .001; INTEGUMENT-2: 42.0% vs 19.7%, respectively; P < .001). Roflumilast was well tolerated with low rates of treatment-emergent adverse events. At each time point, investigators noted no signs of irritation at the application site in 885 patients who were treated with roflumilast (≥95%), and 885 patients who were treated with roflumilast (90%) reported no or mild sensation at the application site. In 2 phase 3 trials enrolling adults and children, once-daily roflumilast cream, 0.15%, improved AD relative to vehicle cream, based on multiple efficacy end points, with favorable safety and tolerability. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT04773587, NCT04773600.

FSCIG 10% in pediatric primary immunodeficiency diseases: a European post-authorization safety study

BackgroundThe safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of hyaluronidase-facilitated subcutaneous immunoglobulin (fSCIG) 10% (dual-vial unit of human immunoglobulin 10% and recombinant human hyaluronidase [rHuPH20]) were assessed in children with primary immunodeficiency diseases (PIDs).MethodsThis phase 4, post-authorization, prospective, interventional, multicenter study (NCT03116347) conducted in the European Economic Area, enrolled patients aged 2 to < 18 years with a documented PID diagnosis who had received immunoglobulin therapy for ≥ 3 months before enrollment. New fSCIG 10% starters underwent fSCIG 10% dose ramp-up for ≤ 6 weeks (epoch 1) before receiving fSCIG 10% for ≤ 3 years (epoch 2); patients pretreated with fSCIG 10% entered epoch 2 directly. The primary outcome was the number and rate (per infusion) of all noninfectious treatment-related serious and severe adverse events (AEs).ResultsIn total, 42 patients were enrolled and dosed (median [range] age: 11.5 [3–17] years; 81% male; 23 new starters; 19 pretreated). Overall, 49 related noninfectious, treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were reported in 15 patients; most were mild in severity (87.8%). No treatment-related serious TEAEs were reported. Two TEAEs (infusion site pain and emotional distress) were reported as severe and treatment-related in a single new fSCIG 10% starter. The rate of local TEAEs was lower in pretreated patients (0.1 event/patient-year) versus new starters (1.3 events/patient-year). No patients tested positive for binding anti-rHuPH20 antibodies (titer of ≥ 1:160).ConclusionsNo safety signals were identified, and the incidence of local AEs declined over the duration of fSCIG 10% treatment. This study supports fSCIG 10% long-term safety in children with PIDs.Trial registration number (ClinicalTrials.gov)NCT03116347.

A Phase I First-in-Human Study of ABBV-011, a Seizure-Related Homolog Protein 6-Targeting Antibody-Drug Conjugate, in Patients With Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Seizure-related homolog protein 6 (SEZ6) is a novel target expressed in small cell lung cancer (SCLC). ABBV-011, a SEZ6-targeted antibody conjugated to calicheamicin, was evaluated in a phase I study (NCT03639194) in patients with relapsed/refractory SCLC. We report initial outcomes of ABBV-011 monotherapy. ABBV-011 was administered intravenously once every 3 weeks (Q3W) during dose escalation (0.3-2 mg/kg) and expansion. Patients with SEZ6-positive tumors (≥25% of tumor cells with ≥1+ staining intensity by immunohistochemistry) were preselected for expansion. Safety, tolerability, antitumor activity, and pharmacokinetics were evaluated. As of August 2022, 99 patients received ABBV-011 monotherapy (dose escalation, n=36; Japanese dose evaluation, n=3; dose expansion, n=60 [1 mg/kg, n=40]); median age was 63 years (range, 41-79). Thirty-two percent, 41%, and 26% of patients received 1, 2, and ≥3 prior therapies, respectively. The maximum tolerated dose was not reached through 2.0 mg/kg. Most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were fatigue (50%), nausea (42%), and thrombocytopenia (41%). Most common hepatic TEAEs were increased aspartate aminotransferase (22%), increased g-glutamyltransferase (21%), and hyperbilirubinemia (17%); 2 patients experienced veno-occlusive liver disease. Objective response rate (ORR) was 19% (19/98). In the 1-mg/kg dose-expansion cohort (n=40), ORR was 25%; median response duration was 4.2 months (95% CI, 2.6-6.7) and median progression-free survival was 3.5 months (95% CI, 1.5-4.2). ABBV-011 1.0 mg/kg Q3W monotherapy was well tolerated and demonstrated encouraging antitumor activity in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed/refractory SCLC. SEZ6 is a promising novel SCLC target and warrants further investigation.

Efficacy and safety of therapeutic alpha-1-microglobulin RMC-035 in reducing kidney injury after cardiac surgery: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, parallel group, phase 2a trial

Cardiac surgery invariably triggers acute kidney stress causing adverse renal outcomes. The AKITA study evaluated the efficacy and safety of RMC-035, a novel analogue of alpha-1-microglobulin, for reducing cardiac surgery-associated kidney injury. In this randomised double-blind placebo-controlled phase 2a study, we randomly assigned (1:1) adult hospitalised patients undergoing open-chest cardiac surgery at high risk for acute kidney injury (AKI) at 21 sites in North America and Europe to receive either RMC-035 (1.3 or 0.65mg/kg) or placebo (1:1) for 2 days (5 intravenous infusions), stratified by region and renal function. Eligible patients had at least one pre-defined AKI risk factor. Patients with severe renal impairment (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <30mL/min/1.73m2) were excluded. The co-primary efficacy and safety endpoints were AKI (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes definition) within 72h after surgery and nature, frequency, and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Secondary endpoints included eGFR and Major Adverse Kidney Events (MAKE) up to Day 90. Randomised patients who had received at least one dose of study drug were analysed for primary and safety analyses. Participants, investigators and sponsor were masked to treatment allocation. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05126303) and EudraCT (2021-004040-19). Patient enrolment was stopped at interim analysis due to futility. Between March 31, 2022 and July 12, 2023, 177 patients (RMC-035: 89, placebo: 88) were randomised and treated. AKI rate for RMC-035 vs placebo was 50.6% (n=45) and 39.8% (n=35) (relative risk [RR]: 1.30, 90% confidence interval [90% CI]: 0.99, 1.71; p=0.12). A short-lived creatinine increase was observed with the higher RMC-035 dose. Treatment with RMC-035 was associated with improved secondary renal outcomes at Day 90: placebo-adjusted eGFR change from baseline 4.3mL/min/1.73m2, 90% CI 0.51-8.12, p=0.06; and MAKE 6.7% (n=6) vs 15.9% (n=14); RR: 0.41, 90% CI: 0.19, 0.88, p=0.05. The most frequently reported TEAEs for RMC-035 were chills (30.3%), nausea (21.3%), anaemia (20.2%); and atrial fibrillation (29.5%), anaemia (20.5%), hypervolemia (14.8%) for placebo. The majority of TEAEs in both treatment groups were mild or moderate in severity. In the RMC-035 group, 26 (29.2%) patients experienced at least one severe or life-threatening TEAE and in the placebo group 16 (18.2%) patients. There were 4 deaths per treatment arm (one treatment-related, in placebo group). In this proof-of-concept study, RMC-035 did not reduce AKI 72h after cardiac surgery. Evaluations may have been confounded by a drug-induced transient creatinine increase in a subgroup of patients. RMC-035 was associated with improved secondary renal outcomes. These results merit further investigation and should be interpreted with caution, as the study was not powered for these outcomes. Guard Therapeutics.

Real-world Effectiveness of Sarilumab in RA: Results from the Open-label, Prospective, Single-arm Observational PROFILE Study.

The 1-year PROspective sarilumab (preFILled syringe/pen) multinational, obsErvational (PROFILE) study evaluated the real-world effectiveness and safety of sarilumab in patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Safety endpoints included adverse events (AEs) and lab abnormalities. Effectiveness endpoints included the ACR core set. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI). All statistics are descriptive and pvalues were nominal. In total, 595 patients were treated, of whom 223 (37.5%) received sarilumab monotherapy and 372 (62.5%) received combination therapy. Upon initiation of sarilumab, an improvement in the mean (SD) CDAI score was observed at week 24 [11.4 (10.3)] and was maintained through week 52 [10.0 (10.5)], resulting in a mean [SD] reduction of -14.9 (12.7) and -14.4 (12.9), respectively. There were consistent improvements in disease activity that were similar for patients on monotherapy vs. combination therapy. An increase in the proportion of patients achieving remission and low disease activity was reported. By week 52, both groups had improved physical function and quality of life. There were no new safety signals. The proportions of any patients reporting a treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) or serious treatment-emergent AE (SAE) was 66.2% and 5.9%, respectively, and were similar between both treatment groups. Overall, 15.6% of patients discontinued sarilumab treatment due to TEAEs. The most commonly reported TEAE of interest was neutropenia (14.1%). In this 1-year, observational real-world study, sarilumab therapy resulted in improved clinical outcomes. The safety profile was consistent with that observed in sarilumab randomized clinical trials. This study was entered on the German website (Paul Ehrlich Institute) on January 11, 2018, with NIS No.: 423.