Treadmill Exercise Echocardiography Research Articles

Comparison of exercise echocardiography to exercise electrocardiographic testing added to echocardiography at rest for risk stratification after uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction

Recommendations for risk assessment after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) include electrocardiographic (ECG) exercise testing. We hypothesized that a more sensitive technique, exercise echocardiography (EE), would refer a greater number of patients to invasive procedures. Therefore, we compared a strategy based on EE with a strategy based on ECG exercise testing for patients with uncomplicated AMI. A series of 164 patients referred for exercise testing after AMI were randomized to treadmill EE (strategy 2) or baseline echocardiography and ECG treadmill exercise testing (strategy 1). Ischemic response was more frequently detected with strategy 2 (59% vs 27%, p <0.001), and consequently angiography and revascularization procedures were more commonly performed (59 vs 32 procedures, p <0.01 and 46 vs 19 procedures, p <0.001, respectively). Fourteen percent and 15% of patients experienced soft events (unstable angina, heart failure, or late revascularization) after strategy 1 and strategy 2, respectively (p = NS); 6% and 9% of patients had hard events (nonfatal AMI or cardiovascular death) at follow-up (p = NS). In conclusion, a strategy based on EE detected more patients with ischemia; therefore, more patients were submitted to coronary angiography and revascularization procedures. No differences were detected in cardiac events when we compared this strategy with the less expensive ECG exercise testing after uncomplicated AMI.

Prediction of mortality in patients without angina: use of an exercise score and exercise echocardiography.

Exercise testing has limited efficacy for identifying coronary artery disease (CAD) in the absence of anginal symptoms. Exercise echocardiography is more accurate than standard exercise testing, but its efficacy in this situation has not been defined. We sought to identify whether the Duke treadmill score or exercise echocardiography (ExE) could be used to identify risk in patients without anginal symptoms. We studied 1859 patients without typical or atypical angina, heart failure, or a history or ECG evidence of infarction or CAD, who were referred for ExE, of whom 1832 (age 51+/-15 years, 944 men) were followed for up to 10 years. The presence and extent of ischaemia and scar were interpreted by expert reviewers at the time of the original study. Exercise provoked significant (>0.1mV) ST segment depression in 215 patients (12%), and wall motion abnormalities in 137 (8%). Seventy-eight patients (4%) died before revascularization, only 17 from known cardiac causes. The independent predictors of death were age (RR 1.1, p<0.0001), smoking, Duke treadmill score (RR 0.9, p<0.0001) and resting LV dysfunction (RR 1.9, p<0.04), but did not include ischaemia at ExE. Echocardiography was not predictive of outcome in subgroups with an intermediate or high risk Duke score, nor in patients with two or more risk factors. Patients without anginal symptoms have a low mortality, especially from cardiac causes. If such individuals undergo exercise testing and a resting echocardiogram, exercise echocardiography does not offer additional prognostic information.

WITHDRAWN: Accuracy of Peak Treadmill Exercise Echocardiography to Detect Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: Comparison with Post-exercise Echocardiography.

The publisher regrets that this was an accidental duplication of an article that has already been published in Eur. J. Echocardiogr., 4 (2003) 182-190, . The duplicate article has therefore been withdrawn.

Effect of infarcted myocardium on diagnostic accuracy of exercise echocardiography for detecting noninfarct-related coronary artery lesions

Background The utility of exercise echocardiography for evaluating remote ischemia due to noninfarct-related artery (n-IRA) lesions in patients with prior myocardial infarction has not been established. Methods Quantitative coronary angiography and treadmill exercise echocardiography were performed within 2 weeks in 115 patients with prior myocardial infarction (>6 weeks) and 224 patients without myocardial infarction. Coronary lumen diameter stenosis ≥50% (by angiography) and the lack of a hyperdynamic response on exercise echocardiography were considered significant. Myocardial infarction size was defined as the number of myocardial segments with severe hypokinesis, akinesis, or dyskinesis on echocardiography at rest. Results For detection of n-IRA lesions in patients with prior myocardial infarction, the sensitivity of exercise echocardiography was similar (78% vs 79%, P = not significant), however, the specificity was significantly lower (77% vs 91%, P < .01) than for detection of significant stenoses in patients without prior myocardial infarction. Angiographic percent-diameter stenosis, presence of collateral vessel, achieved exercise level, and presence of peri-infarct ischemia did not affect the specificity of exercise echocardiography. However, the specificity of exercise echocardiography was significantly lower (69% vs 84%, P < .05) in patients with echocardiographically large infarction (infarction size ≥2) than in patients with small infarction (infarction size <2). Conclusion In patients with prior myocardial infarction, exercise echocardiography showed low specificity for detection of noninfarct-related artery lesions, especially in patients with echocardiographically large myocardial infarction. These characteristics of treadmill exercise echocardiography should be considered when this technique is applied for patients with healed myocardial infarction. (Am Heart J 2003;145:162-8.)

Ecocardiografía de ejercicio para diferenciar la miocardiopatía dilatada de la disfunción ventricular por cardiopatía isquémica

Previous studies have shown the usefulness of dobutamine echocardiography to differentiate dilated cardiomyopathy (DC) from ischemic left ventricular dysfunction (ILVD), but no studies have been made using exercise echocardiography (EE). We hypothesized that most patients with DC have some contractile reserve and experience an increase in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) during exercise, as opposed to patients with ILVD. Differences in response to EE may be useful to clinically differentiate between these two entities. Between 1 March 1995 and 1 March 2001, we performed 4,133 EE studies on 3,830 patients. Of 289 patients (8%) with moderate or severe LV dysfunction (biplane LVEF < 41% and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter > 5.2 cm), 207 were excluded: 111 for a history of myocardial infarction; 28 for scarring on echocardiography (regional akinesia/dyskinesia with thinning and/or increased brightness); 13 for previous revascularization procedures; 9 for aortic valve disease; 11 for a known cause of cardiomyopathy; and 35 for not undergoing angiography. The study group was therefore composed of 82 patients who were encouraged to perform maximal treadmill EE. EE criteria for ILVD were either impaired regional wall motion (RWM) or a decrease/no change in LVEF from baseline to peak exercise, while criteria for DC were RWM improvement/no change and LVEF increase. The ILVD group was formed by 39 patients with stenosis >/= 70% diameter stenosis of a major epicardial coronary artery or major branch vessel. The remaining 43 patients constituted the DC group. The number of coronary risk factors (ILVD 2.0 1.1; DC 1.9 1.1), baseline LVEF (ILVD 30 7; DC 30 8), and exercise-induced angina (ILVD 23%; DC 14%) did not differ between groups (p = NS). ILVD patients achieved less Mets (6.6 3.1 vs 8.3 2.8; p < 0.05), had a lower heart rate x systolic blood pressure product (22 5 vs 27 7; p < 0.001), and developed regional and/or global LV dysfunction more frequently (79 vs 28%; p < 0.001). Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and global accuracy for ILVD detection were 79% (95% CI: 70-88), 72% (95% CI: 63-81), 72% (95% CI: 63-81), 79% (95% CI: 67-85), and 76% (95% CI: 69-83), respectively. Global and/or regional LV function impairment with exercise is accurate in identifying patients with ILVD. This method could reduce the need for invasive procedures.

Prediction of mortality in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy by clinical, exercise stress, and echocardiographic data

ObjectivesThis study evaluated the clinical, exercise stress test, and echocardiographic predictors of mortality and cardiac events in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). BackgroundLeft ventricular hypertrophy is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. MethodsSymptom-limited treadmill exercise echocardiography was performed for evaluation of coronary artery disease in 483 patients (age, 66 ± 11 years; 281 men) with LVH. End points during follow-up were all-cause mortality and hard cardiac events (cardiac death and nonfatal myocardial infarction [MI]). ResultsForty-six patients died and 14 had nonfatal MI. The cumulative mortality rate was higher in patients with abnormal exercise echocardiography (3% vs. 0.4% at one year, 11.7% vs. 3.7% at three years, and 18.3% vs. 9.5% at five years, p < 0.001). In a sequential multivariate analysis model of clinical, exercise test, and rest and exercise echocardiographic data, incremental predictors of mortality were workload (hazard ratio [HR], 0.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.3 to 0.9), rate pressure product (HR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.5 to 0.9), left ventricular (LV) mass index (HR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.1 to 1.8), and failure to increase ejection fraction (EF) with exercise (HR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.1 to 3.8). Predictors of cardiac events were history of coronary artery bypass grafting (HR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.2 to 5.4), lower exercise rate-pressure product (HR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.5 to 0.8), resting wall motion score index (HR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.1 to 1.8), and failure to increase EF with exercise (HR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.6 to 6.9). ConclusionsIn patients with LVH, LV mass index and EF response to exercise are independent predictors of mortality, incremental to clinical and exercise test data and resting LV function. A normal exercise echocardiogram predicts a relatively low mortality rate during the following three years.

Usefulness of isometric handgrip during treadmill exercise stress echocardiography

Usefulness of isometric handgrip during treadmill exercise stress echocardiography

Effect of Left Ventricular Global Systolic Function, Mitral Regurgitation, and Left Ventricular Inflow Pattern on Exercise Echocardiography Results

Diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) by exercise echocardiography is usually based on rest or exercise-induced regional wall-motion abnormalities. Mitral regurgitation (MR), left ventricular (LV) global systolic function, and LV inflow measurements can be assessed during exercise echocardiography; however, their diagnostic value has not been analyzed consistently. Treadmill exercise echocardiography and coronary angiography were performed in 120 patients (94 male, 26 female; mean age 61 +/- 10 years [+/- 1 SD]) to evaluate known or suspected CAD. Positive exercise echocardiography was defined either as a rest- or exercise-induced regional wall-motion abnormalities. An abnormal response of LV ejection fraction (EF), LV volumes, MR (as assessed by color Doppler), and LV inflow pattern was defined as a fall in LVEF, a LV end-diastolic volume increase, a LV end-systolic volume increase, a new or increased MR, or a change from an impaired relaxation pattern (E < A) to a "pseudonormalized" pattern (E > A) from rest to exercise, respectively. CAD (> or = 50% luminal narrowing in at least one vessel) was found in 89 (74%) patients. EE-based regional wall-motion abnormality analysis was positive in 95 (79%) patients and negative in 25 (21%) patients. Feasible images for regional wall-motion abnormalities, LVEF and volumes, LV inflow, and MR measurements were acquired in 90% of patients. Regional wall-motion abnormality analysis and LVEF decrease provided the greatest sensitivities for CAD (94% and 75%, respectively), while the highest specificity was given by a new or increased MR (90%), the development of a pseudonormalized pattern (88%), and the appearance of angina (87%). A positive electrocardiogram (ECG) finding in patients with interpretable ECGs provided good sensitivity and specificity (67% and 85%, respectively). In conclusion, a complete rest and exercise Doppler echocardiography approach is feasible in most patients. Regional wall-motion abnormalities are the most accurate exercise echocardiography variable for diagnosing CAD, whereas exercise ECG remains a good test in patients with interpretable ECGs. Exercise echocardiography, exercise ECG, newly developed or increased MR, and change to a pseudonormalized LV inflow pattern are highly specific.

Utility and limitation of treadmill exercise echocardiography for detecting significant coronary stenosis in infarct-related arteries in patients with healed myocardial infarction

This clinical study examines the diagnostic accuracy of exercise echocardiography for detecting significant coronary stenoses in infarct-related arteries in patients with healed myocardial infarction. Quantitative coronary angiography and exercise echocardiography using treadmill testing were performed within 2 weeks of each other in 123 patients with a prior myocardial infarction. Coronary lumen diameter stenosis ≥50% by quantitative coronary angiography and the lack of a hyperdynamic response on exercise echocardiography was considered significant. For detection of infarct-related coronary lesions, treadmill exercise echocardiography was highly sensitive (91%) but less specific (59%) than for detection of non-infarct-related artery lesions. The 2 groups of patients with large and small infarct sites had similar sensitivity for detection of residual stenosis of the infarct-related artery (88% vs 96%, p = NS); however, the specificity of the small infarct sites for this purpose was significantly higher than that of the large infarct sites (86% vs 33%, p <0.01). When remote ischemia was detected on exercise echocardiography, the specificity of exercise echocardiography was significantly lower (33% vs 70%, p <0.05) than when remote ischemia was not present. Thus, although there is high sensitivity, the specificity of treadmill exercise echocardiography for detecting infarct-related artery lesions is limited. However, high specificity is maintained when the infarct size is small and/or remote ischemia is not present.

Real-time assessment of myocardial perfusion and wall motion during bicycle and treadmill exercise echocardiography: comparison with single photon emission computed tomography

OBJECTIVESWe sought to determine the feasibility and accuracy of real-time imaging of myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) in detecting myocardial perfusion defects during exercise echocardiography compared with radionuclide tomography.BACKGROUNDUltrasound imaging at a low mechanical index and frame rate (10 to 20 Hz) after intravenous injections of perfluorocarbon containing microbubbles has the potential to evaluate myocardial perfusion and wall motion (WM) simultaneously and in real time.METHODSOne hundred consecutive patients with intermediate-to-high probability of coronary artery disease underwent treadmill (n = 50) or supine bicycle (n = 50) exercise echocardiography. Segmental perfusion with MCE and WM were assessed in real time before and at peak exercise using low mechanical index (0.3) and frame rates of 10 to 20 Hz after 0.3 ml bolus injections of intravenous Optison (Mallinckrodt Inc., San Diego, California). All patients had a dual isotope (rest thallium-201, stress sestamibi) study performed during the same exercise session, and 44 patients had subsequent quantitative coronary angiography.RESULTSIn the 100 patients, agreement between MCE and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) was 76%, while it was 88% between MCE and WM assessment. Compared with quantitative angiography, sensitivity of MCE, SPECT and WM was comparable (75%), with a specificity ranging from 81% to 100%. The combination of MCE and WM had the best balance between sensitivity and specificity (86% and 88%, respectively) with the highest accuracy (86%).CONCLUSIONSThe real-time assessment of myocardial perfusion during exercise stress echocardiography can be achieved with imaging at low mechanical index and frame rates. The combination of WM and MCE correlates well with SPECT and is a promising important addition to conventional stress echocardiography.

Relationship between Exercise-induced Blood Pressure Response and Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Patients with Hypertension

Background：In hypertensive patients who show abnormal blood pressure (BP response during exercise, a more excessive blood pressure response may occur in the daily life and cause end organ damage. However, previous studies concerning exaggerated BP response during exercise have been unable to establish its significance and role in left ventricular hypertrophy. The purpose of this study was to determine the relation between exaggerated BP response during exercise and left ventricular hypertrophy. Methods：A treadmill exercise test and echocardiography were performed in 117 patients with hypertension. Sixty-six patients showed normal BP response, and fifty-one patients showed exaggerated BP response. Exaggerated BP response was defined as an elevation of peak exercise systolic BP over 210 mmHg or >10 mmHg elevation of peak exercise diastolic BP from baseline. The correlation between BP response and left ventricular mass index were evaluated in two groups. Results：The results were as follows：1 The peak systolic and diastolic BP were significantly higher in patients with exaggerated BP response than that in patients with normal BP response (p<0.05. 2 There was a weakly significant relation between peak exercise systolic BP and left ventricular hypertrophy, however diastolic BP showed no significant correlation with left ventricular hypertrophy. 3 The left ventricular mass index was significantly increased in patients with exaggerated BP response (normal BP response：120±25 gm/m 2 , exaggerated BP response：169±46 gm/m 2 , p＝0.04. Conclusion：These results indicate that, as compared with resting BP, exercise BP response seems to be important in the treatment of hypertension and more strict blood pressure control may be needed in hypertensive patients with exaggerated BP response. Further study is needed to understand the significance of exaggerated BP response in hypertension.(Korean Circulation J 2001;31(8 :809-814

Accuracy of exercise echocardiography to detect coronary artery disease in left bundle branch block unassociated with either acute or healed myocardial infarction

To search for the value of treadmill exercise echocardiography in the detection of coronary artery disease in noninfarcted patients with left bundle branch block, we studied 35 patients (17 with coronary artery disease). We found high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy (76%, 83%, and 80%, respectively).

Comparison of Treadmill Exercise Echocardiography Before and After Exercise in the Evaluation of Patients with Known or Suspected Coronary Artery Disease

Objectives: We sought to compare the feasibility and accuracy of peak treadmill exercise echocardiography versus postexercise echocardiography imaging. Background: Although peak exercise echocardiography has been reported for both supine and orthostatic bicycle exercise and has shown higher sensitivity than postexercise imaging, acquiring images at peak exercise with treadmill has not been explored. Methods: Peak and post-treadmill exercise echocardiography and coronary angiography were performed on 89 patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. Positive exercise echocardiography was defined as necrosis or ischemic response. Positive coronary angiography was defined as ≥1 diseased vessels (≥50% luminal narrowing). Images were analyzed in a blind manner by an expert observer. Results: Postexercise images were acquired within 80 seconds after exercise (40 ± 14). Mean heart rate (bpm) was 139 ± 22 at peak versus 118 ± 25 at postexercise imaging ( P < .001). Interpretable peak and postexercise images were obtained for all 89 patients. Of the 72 classified as having positive exercise echocardiography, 23 had new regional wall motion abnormality at peak (21 with positive angiography), which resolved at postexercise imaging. Sensitivity was higher with peak than with postexercise imaging (94% vs 73%, P < .001). Specificity was similar (68% vs 79%), as was predictive positive value (92% vs 93%). Negative predictive value was again higher with peak imaging (76% vs 44%, P < .05). Total accuracy was higher with peak imaging (89% vs 74%, P < .05). Conclusions: Peak treadmill exercise echocardiography is technically feasible and has higher sensitivity and accuracy than post-treadmill exercise echocardiography. Therefore in the clinical setting peak exercise echocardiography should be performed to diagnose ischemia. (J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1999;12:1073-9.)

Aortic Regurgitation Reduces the Accuracy of Exercise Echocardiography for Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Disease

The association of aortic regurgitation with left ventricular size, hypertrophy, and abnormal coronary flow may influence the accuracy of stress testing techniques for the diagnosis of coronary disease. We examined the diagnostic accuracy of treadmill exercise echocardiography to predict coronary artery disease in 76 patients with moderate to severe aortic regurgitation. Rest and poststress images were interpreted by 2 experienced observers, and accuracy was defined by comparison with stenoses ≥50% diameter at coronary angiography. Results were compared with accuracy in a control group of previously published studies in patients without valvular heart disease. After 6 patients were excluded because of a submaximal heart rate response (<85% age-predicted maximal heart rate), 70 patients were included in the final analysis. Patients with aortic regurgitation were of comparable age to the control group and exercised to similar workload. In 16 (23%) patients with significant coronary artery disease and significant aortic regurgitation, the sensitivity of exercise echocardiography was 56% compared with 83% in the control group ( P = .03). The specificity in 54 patients with aortic regurgitation but no significant coronary artery disease was 67% compared with 83% in the control group ( P = .02). Accuracy was 64% in aortic regurgitation compared with 83% in the control group ( P = .02). In patients with aortic regurgitation, accuracy in the left anterior descending artery territory (76%) marginally exceeded that in the posterior (right + circumflex coronary artery) circulation (70%). Thus the presence of significant aortic regurgitation affects the regional wall motion of the left ventricle during exercise and adversely affects the accuracy of exercise echocardiography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. (J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1999;12:967-73.)

Labil subaortic obstruction during exercise stress echocardiography

Exercise-induced subaortic obstruction and/or mitral valve systolic anterior motion causing mitral regurgitation were found in 43 of 2,280 patients (1.8%) assigned to treadmill exercise echocardiography.

Supine bicycle versus post–treadmill exercise echocardiography in the detection of myocardial ischemia: a randomized single-blind crossover trial

OBJECTIVESWe sought to determine the comparative accuracy of supine bicycle exercise echocardiography (SBE) and posttreadmill exercise echocardiography (TME) in detecting myocardial ischemia in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease (CAD).BACKGROUNDSupine bicycle echocardiography and TME have been used for evaluation of CAD. However, the comparative accuracy of these modalities in the detection of ischemia in the same patients is not known.METHODSSeventy-four patients (age 59 ± 9 years [mean ± SD]) referred for evaluation of coronary disease underwent SBE (starting at 25 to 50 W with 25-W increment every 3 min) and post-TME (Bruce protocol) in a random sequence. Digitized images at baseline and maximal exercise were interpreted in a random and blinded fashion.RESULTSMaximal heart rate was higher during TME, whereas systolic blood pressure was higher during SBE, resulting in a similar double product. At quantitative angiography (n = 67), 57 patients had coronary stenosis (>50%). During SBE, ischemia was detected in 47 patients compared with 38 patients by TME (p < 0.001). Wall motion score index at maximal exercise was higher with SBE than with TME (1.48 ± 0.51 vs. 1.38 ± 0.43; p < 0.001). The extent of myocardial ischemia (number of ischemic segments) was higher during SBE compared with TME (3.3 ± 3.4 vs. 2.3 ± 2.9 segments; p = 0.004), whereas severity of abnormal wall motion was similar. The sensitivity of SBE and TME for CAD was 82% and 75% with a specificity of 80% and 90%, respectively. Image quality was similar with both techniques. Patients and sonographers favored SBE over TME.CONCLUSIONSDuring SBE and TME exercise, patients achieve a similar double product. During SBE, however, the detection of ischemia is more frequent and more extensive which, along with patient and sonographer preference, makes supine bicycle exercise a valuable stress echocardiographic modality.

The Effect of Exercise on Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation

This study investigated the effect of dynamic exercise on mitral regurgitation (MR) as assessed by color flow Doppler imaging and tested the hypothesis that MR increases in patients with left ventricular (LV) function worsening during exercise. We studied 513 patients (390 men, 123 women:mean age [+/-1 SD] 58+/-11 years) referred for treadmill exercise echocardiography (EE) to evaluate known or suspected coronary artery disease. Normal EE was seen in 182 (36%), necrosis in 131 (25%), and ischemic response (with or without necrosis) in 200 (39%). MR assessment was performed at rest and immediately postexercise, on the basis of the mosaic area. At rest, mild MR (<3 cm2) was seen in 138; moderate (3 to 6 cm2) was seen in 21; and severe (>6 cm2) was seen in 5. Forty-two patients developed new, mild (n=35), moderate (n=6), or severe (n=1) MR during exercise. Patients were assigned to three groups: group 1--new or increased MR from rest to exercise (n=70); group 2--MR at rest unchanged or decreased (n=136); and group 3--no MR at rest and exercise (n=307). At rest, LV ejection fraction (EF) and wall motion score index (WMSI) were similar in group 1 and group 2 but improved in group 3 (EF: group 1, 51+/-11%; group 2, 53+/-10%; group 3, 56+/-8%, p<0.001 vs group 1 and group 2. WMSI: group 1, 1.3+/-0.3; group 2, 1.3+/-0.4; group 3, 1.1+/-0.2, p<0.01 vs group 1, p<0.001 vs group 2). At exercise, EF and WMSI were impaired in group 1 (EF: group 1, 52+/-14%; group 2, 58+/-15%; group 3, 64+/-11%, p<0.001 vs group 1 and group 2; p<0.05 between group 1 and group 2. WMSI: group 1, 1.5+/-0.4; group 2, 1.4+/-0.4; group 3, 1.2+/-0.3, p<0.001 vs group 1 and group 2, p<0.05 between group 1 and group 2). An ischemic response was common in group 1 (67% vs 35% in group 2 and 34% in group 3, p<0.001 between group 1 and group 3 and between group 1 and group 2). Accordingly, in group 1 patients, exercise time was diminished (7.3+/-2.7 vs 8.4+/-2.7 in group 2 and 9.3+/-2.4 in group 3, p<0.01, between group 1 and group 2, p<0.001 between group 1 and group 3, p<0.001 between group 2 and group 3) and the number of severely narrowed coronary vessels greater (2.4+/-0.9 vs 1.7+/-1.0 in group 2 and 1.7+/-1.0 in group 3). In conclusion, MR does not increase in most patients submitted to dynamic exercise echocardiography. However, if MR develops, severe LV function worsening should be suspected.

Comparison of Dobutamine and Treadmill Exercise Echocardiography in Inducing Ischemia in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease

Objectives. We sought to compare the magnitude of ischemia precipitated by both treadmill exercise and dobutamine stress echocardiography.Background. Although it is alleged that dobutamine stress produces ischemia similar in degree and extent to that produced during treadmill exercise, a direct comparison with treadmill exercise, the most common form of exercise, has not been performed.Methods. Eighty-five consecutive patients with known coronary artery disease underwent both stress tests on the same day, in random order.Results. Sixty-two patients (73%) had positive results on exercise echocardiography compared with 53 (62%) who had positive results on dobutamine stress (p = NS). Of the 53 patients with positive dobutamine test results, wall motion abnormalities appeared after the addition of atropine in 35 patients (66%). During dobutamine infusion, 22 patients (26%) had a hypotensive response that was reversed in 16 by prompt administration of atropine. At peak dobutamine–atropine stress, heart rate was higher than that at peak exercise (p < 0.001), whereas systolic blood pressure and rate–pressure product were higher at peak exercise than at peak dobutamine–atropine stress (p = 0.0001). In the 53 patients with positive results on both tests, peak wall motion score index was greater with treadmill exercise than with dobutamine–atropine infusion ([mean ± SD] 1.73 ± 0.45 vs. 1.57 ± 0.44, p < 0.001).Conclusions. Echocardiography immediately after treadmill exercise induces a greater ischemic burden than dobutamine–atropine infusion. In the clinical setting, exercise echocardiography should therefore be chosen over dobutamine echocardiography for diagnosing ischemia, when possible. When dobutamine echocardiography is used as an alternative modality, maximal heart rate should always be achieved by the addition of atropine.

Lack of Effect of Estrogen on Rest and Treadmill Exercise in Postmenopausal Women Without Known Cardiac Disease

To assess the peripheral vascular effects of estrogen in women without coronary disease, normal postmenopausal women (mean age 56 +/- 8 years) participated in a randomized, crossover trial using treadmill exercise echocardiography, and received oral conjugated estrogen, 0.625 mg/day or underwent a drug-free period. There was no significant effect on heart rate, blood pressure, double product, left ventricular end-systolic and end-diastolic diameters, or electrocardiographic measures after estrogen. In contrast to the profound effects reported in patients with cardiac disease, oral estrogen in normal women does not bestow significant benefit on treadmill exercise echocardiographic variables at rest or during modest levels of exercise.

Treadmill exercise echocardiography: Methodology and clinical role

Exercise echocardiography using treadmill exercise and immediate post-exercise imaging is an accurate means for detecting and stratifying coronary artery disease. It is applicable to patients with chest pain syndromes in whom the initial diagnosis is being contemplated and also in follow-up of patients after myocardial infarction or interventional procedures. Numerous studies have demonstrated that its accuracy is equivalent to that of competing radionuclide imaging techniques and that it has particular relevance in patients with non-diagnostic electrocardiograms. In addition to evaluating patients for the presence of coronary artery disease, because of the highly versatile nature of the imaging modality utilized (two-dimensional echocardiography), stress echocardiography is an excellent tool for evaluating atypical symptoms such as dyspnoea and fatigue.