SEER, Vol.87,No. 1,January 200g Reviews Frazier,Melissa. Romantic Encounters: Writers, Readers, andthe'Library forReading'. Stanford University Press,Stanford, CA, 2007.xi + 246pp. Notes.Index. $55.00. Osip Senkovskii(1800-58),whom Melissa Frazierplaces at the centreof thiswell-produced monograph on the Russianliterary worldin theage of NicholasI, has receivedrather little attention from literary historians. A Pole who studiedArabic and Turkishat the University of Vilnius,Senkovskii (ormoreaccurately Józef-Julian Sçkowski) travelled in theMiddleEast from 1819to 1822and thentookup concurrent postsas a translator intheRussian Ministry of ForeignAffairs and Professor of Oriental Languages at St Petersburg University. He also transformed himself fromPolishscholarinto Russianmanofletters. From1834he achievedconsiderable successas a journalist , havingbeeninvited bytheenterprising publisher and book-seller A. F. Smirdin toeditthejournalLibrary forReading whichinitsheyday, inthe1830s, attracted some5,000-7,000subscribers. A man ofgreaterudition, Senkovskii was on one level a conventional scholar,the authorof dictionaries and encyclopaedia entries and translator ofprimary sources.On another, literary andjournalistic, level,hewastheauthoroforiental travel sketches and articles and reviewson numerousscientific and practicalsubjects, fromgalvanism, homeopathy and railwaysto paper-making and bee-keeping, as well as a prolific commentator on Russianand foreign literatures. The encyclopaedic natureof theLibrary forReading, withitssectionson sciences,industry and agriculture as well as thoseon Russianand foreign literatures and literary criticism, reflected the Voltaireanspiritof the Enlightenment that had informed Senkovskii's education.At thesame time,Frazierclaims,hisrelationswithhis public and his assumption of variousflamboyant, fictitious authorial personae(forinstance, BaronBrambeus, Kritikzada, CO.O. . . .O!', 'ThreeLandowners from Tver", Tiutiun'dzhi-Oglu) locatehimfirmly in the Romanticage. Only in themid1840sdid he fadefromtheliterary scene, withdrawing fromactiveinvolvement in the productionof the Library for Reading and retiring fromhis post at St Petersburg University. He both exploited and suffered from hisorigin as a Pole inimperial Russia,putting his outsider status toconservative endsbutfailing tosecurethediplomatic career to whichhe mayhave aspired.He was muchreviled, notleastby Pushkin and Gogol',forhisallegedhypocrisy, plagiarism and lackofintegrity, and for hisrole in thecommercialization ofliterature, againstwhichwriters in the Romanticage often inveigh. Frazier'spurpose,however, is notto dwellnarrowly on thisnon-canonical figure but to place him in a verybroad culturalcontext.She is therefore concernedwith the professionalization of literary activity in the age of Nicholas,thedevelopment ofa literary marketplace, theenlargement ofthe reading public,and theappearanceofa provincial readership. She examines thecomplicated forms ofauthorship, spurious editing and collecting ofdocumentsthatwerepractised duringthisperiod.She explorestherelationships between writers, editors andreaders anddiscusses thefunctions ofthe'library' 338 SEER, 87, 2, APRIL 2OO9 (as thesiteof a collection, book-lending facility and 'engineof a would-be literary marketplace', as well as virtualspace in an encyclopaedic journal [p. 139]).Nor is thisbroadcontext exclusively Russian.Indeedifa criticism istobe madeofFrazier's monograph thenitisperhapsthatitoffers excessive detailon suchnon-Russian matters as thehistory oftheturn-of-the-century GermanRomanticsand theirorgantheAthenaeum, Friedrich Schlegel'srelations withhismistress Dorothea,Wordsworth's and Coleridge's Lyrical Ballads, Frase fs Magazine forTownandCountry, thenarratorial personaeof Constant, RousseauandWalterScott,and Scott'santiquarianism and hisattitude tothe British Empire. Frazier'scentralconcernis withthenatureof RussianRomanticism, of whichshe sees Senkovskii and theLibrary forReading, despitethe marginal statusthatis usuallyaccordedthem,as 'extreme'manifestations (p. 202). If Romanticwriters created'slippery identities' and occupieda 'slippery space' (p. 179),thenSenkovskii, a Pole fromtheperiphery of the empireseeking influence at itscentre, pursuing an academiccareeras an Orientalist, and striving to attain'criticalomnipotence' (passim) by offering up 'pre-digested books'orready-made pleasures and thoughts (p. 121)through fabricated identities , was their typical representative. Frazier'sviewofRussianRomanticism is groundedin herbeliefthatRomanticism, paceitsown claimto yearnfor wholeness and authenticity, is a construction 'offragments and ever-shifting borders, a sortofdance aroundthemargins ofan apparently empty centre thatcan be eithera sublimelocusofpotentiality orjust that,empty'(p. 3). Russia,according tothisview,remains a 'blankspace' (p. 193)or 'empty vessel '(p. 202),itsborders influx'likethoseofitswriterand reader-inhabitants' (p. 201).To be sure,theRomanticquestfornationalidentity didfindexpressiontherein a prolonged debateaboutnarodnost' in itsburgeoning literature. Andyetin thelastanalysis Russiannationaldistinctiveness, paradoxicalas it mayseem,amounted toa 'uniquely Russianability toappropriate andabsorb' (p. 188)whatothershad produced,as indicatedby Russianwriters' 'highly self-conscious appropriation ofa Western Europeanliterature' (p. 3). Not every readerwillbe persuadedthatSenkovskii is indeeda quintessentialrepresentative ofRomanticism in itsRussiancontext and thattheLibrary forReading is Romanticism's quintessential organ.Nevertheless Frazierhas produceda thoughtful and lucidlywritten book (witha usefulindex,but unfortunately no bibliography). She makescopioususe oftheoretical writing and engagesindepthwithexisting scholarship abouttheconditions inwhich Russianwriters operatedin theage ofNicholasand moregenerally about contemporary Europeanwriters, readersand Romanticism. Department ofRussian Studies Derek Offord University ofBristol Andrew,Joe. Narrative, Spaceand Gender inRussianFiction: 1846-1goj. Studies in SlavicLiterature and Poetics,47. Rodopi,Amsterdam and...
Read full abstract