Traumatic Orthopedic Injuries Research Articles

A Brief Mind-body Intervention Is Feasible and May Prevent Persistent Pain After Acute Orthopaedic Traumas: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Approximately 20% to 50% of patients develop persistent pain after traumatic orthopaedic injuries. Psychosocial factors are an important predictor of persistent pain; however, there are no evidence-based, mind-body interventions to prevent persistent pain for this patient population. (1) Does the Toolkit for Optimal Recovery after Injury (TOR) achieve a priori feasibility benchmarks in a multisite randomized control trial (RCT)? (2) Does TOR demonstrate a preliminary effect in improving pain, as well as physical and emotional function? This pilot RCT of TOR versus a minimally enhanced usual care comparison group (MEUC) was conducted among 195 adults with an acute orthopaedic traumatic injury at risk for persistent pain at four geographically diverse Level 1 trauma centers between October 2021 to August 2023. Fifty percent (97 of 195) of participants were randomized to TOR (mean age 43 ± 17 years; 67% [65 of 97] women) and 50% (98) to MEUC (mean age 45 ± 16 years; 67% [66 of 98] women). In TOR, 24% (23 of 97) of patients were lost to follow-up, whereas in the MEUC, 17% (17 of 98) were lost. At 4 weeks, 78% (76 of 97) of patients in TOR and 95% (93 of 98) in the MEUC completed the assessments; by 12 weeks, 76% (74 of 97) of patients in TOR and 83% (81 of 98) in the MEUC completed the assessments (all participants were still included in the analysis consistent with an intention-to-treat approach). The TOR has four weekly video-administered sessions that teach pain coping skills. The MEUC is an educational pamphlet. Both were delivered in addition to usual care. Primary outcomes were feasibility of recruitment (the percentage of patients who met study criteria and enrolled) and data collection, appropriateness of treatment (the percent of participants in TOR who score above the midpoint on the Credibility and Expectancy Scale), acceptability (the percentage of patients in TOR who attend at least three of four sessions), and treatment satisfaction (the percent of participants in TOR who score above the midpoint on the Client Satisfaction Scale). Secondary outcomes included additional feasibility (including collecting data on narcotics and rescue medications and adverse events), fidelity (whether the intervention was delivered as planned) and acceptability metrics (patients and staff), pain (numeric rating scale), physical function (Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment questionnaire [SMFA], PROMIS), emotional function (PTSD [PTSD Checklist], depression [Center for Epidemiologic Study of Depression]), and intervention targets (pain catastrophizing, pain anxiety, coping, and mindfulness). Assessments occurred at baseline, 4 and 12 weeks. Several outcomes exceeded a priori benchmarks: feasibility of recruitment (89% [210 of 235] of eligible participants consented), appropriateness (TOR: 73% [66 of 90] scored > midpoint on the Credibility and Expectancy Scale), data collection (79% [154 of 195] completed all surveys), satisfaction (TOR: 99% [75 of 76] > midpoint on the Client Satisfaction Scale), and acceptability (TOR: 73% [71 of 97] attended all four sessions). Participation in TOR, compared with the MEUC, was associated with improvement from baseline to postintervention and from baseline to follow-up in physical function (SMFA, baseline to post: -7 [95% CI -11 to -4]; p < 0.001; baseline to follow-up: -6 [95% CI -11 to -1]; p = 0.02), PROMIS (PROMIS-PF, baseline to follow-up: 2 [95% CI 0 to 4]; p = 0.045), pain at rest (baseline to post: -1.2 [95% CI -1.7 to -0.6]; p < 0.001; baseline to follow-up: -1 [95% CI -1.7 to -0.3]; p = 0.003), activity (baseline to post: -0.7 [95% CI -1.3 to -0.1]; p = 0.03; baseline to follow-up: -0.8 [95% CI -1.6 to -0.1]; p = 0.04), depressive symptoms (baseline to post: -6 [95% CI -9 to -3]; p < 0.001; baseline to follow-up: -5 [95% CI -9 to -2]; p < 0.002), and posttraumatic symptoms (baseline to post: -4 [95% CI -7 to 0]; p = 0.03; baseline to follow-up: -5 [95% CI -9 to -1]; p = 0.01). Improvements were generally clinically important and sustained or continued through the 3 months of follow-up (that is, above the minimum clinically important different [MCID] of 7 for the SMFA, the MCID of 3.6 for PROMIS, the MCID of 2 for pain at rest and pain during activity, the MCID of more than 10% change in depressive symptoms, and the MCID of 10 for posttraumatic symptoms). There were treatment-dependent improvements in pain catastrophizing, pain anxiety, coping, and mindfulness. TOR was feasible and potentially efficacious in preventing persistent pain among patients with an acute orthopaedic traumatic injury. Using TOR in clinical practice may prevent persistent pain after orthopaedic traumatic injury. Level I, therapeutic study.

Characterization of patient population receiving bioactive glass bone graft substitute as intraoperative treatment for orthopaedic trauma fractures

BackgroundBioactive glass synthetic bone grafts are used to treat osseous defects in orthopaedic surgery. Characterization of the clinical scenarios associated with bioactive glass use in the context of orthopaedic trauma, are not well established. This study aims to characterize population demographics, operative variables, as well as postoperative variables, for patients who required bone grafting for treatment of traumatic orthopaedic injuries and received a bioactive glass bone substitute intraoperatively. MethodsThe electronic medical record at a large Level I trauma center was queried for fracture patients between January 1st, 2019, and April 30th, 2022. Our retrospective cohort included fracture patients who received Fibergraft Matrix or Fibergraft Putty intraoperatively, and their respective control groups. This study ascertained patient demographic variables, operative variables, and postoperative variables. Differences in categorical variables were tested with Fischer's Exact Tests, while differences in continuous variables were tested with ANOVA. Statistical significance was determined as P < 0.05. If the overall Group model was significant for a given variable, post-hoc Fischer's Exact or Tukey HSD tests were used to assess pairwise significance between individual Group pairs. ResultsA total of four categories across our analysis of demographic, operative, and postoperative variables displayed significant differences amongst subject Groups (P ≤ 0.03). Individual groups were compared such that significant differences between subject groups could be appreciated for a specific variable. FM subjects had greater length of surgery, billable costs, and vitamin D supplementation at the time of surgery compared to FM controls. Similarly, FP subjects had greater length of surgery, billable cost, and implants used intraoperatively compared to FP controls. ConclusionThis analysis revealed Fibergraft patients to have greater length of surgery and billable cost, with respect to their matched controls. These data suggest that Fibergraft patients had more severe orthopaedic fractures compared to matched controls.

Advances in Understanding and Managing Floating Knee Injuries: A Comprehensive Review.

Fractures of the ipsilateral tibia and femur, frequently combined with soft tissue damage and dislocations, describe floating knee injuries, a complicated orthopedic condition. Epidemiological data suggest that floating knee injuries account for a small but significant proportion of traumatic orthopedic injuries, with a higher incidence observed in younger males engaged in high-risk activities. Anatomically, floating knee injuries involve fractures of the femur and tibia, ligamentous disruptions, and soft tissue damage, contributing to the complexity and severity of these injuries. An extensive analysis of floating knee injuries is given in this paper, including information about epidemiology, anatomy, pathophysiology, categorization, management approaches, complications, prognosis, and current and upcoming developments.

DRUG AND ALCOHOL USE IN ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA PATIENTS: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY

The objective of this study is to prospectively investigate the prevalence, patterns, and correlates of drug and alcohol use among orthopaedic trauma patients. After the ethical approval from the institutional review board, this cross-sectional study was conducted at Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Center from 01/09/23 to 29/02/24. Baseline data was collected upon admission and included demographic information (such as age and gender) and a comprehensive assessment of substance use history. Substance use was assessed using validated screening tools, including the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) and the Drug Abuse Screening Test (DAST), to capture patterns of alcohol and drug use, frequency, duration, and any previous treatment history for substance use disorders. In the present study, the prevalence of drug and alcohol use among the orthopedic traumatic participants was (40%). Among them, the majority (51%) were using alcohol, followed by marijuana use (25%), and then cocaine (11%). The means of hospital stay of participants in substance non-users and users (2.4±0.8 vs. 6.83±1.1; P&lt;0.0001). Pre-injury alcohol and drug use appear to correlate with extended hospital stays among patients with traumatic orthopaedic injuries.

Perioperative nutritional status thought to be important, but poorly understood.

Malnutrition has been shown to increase complications and leads to poor outcomes in surgical patients, but it has not been studied extensively in orthopedic trauma. This study's purpose is to determine the perspective and assessment of nutrition by orthopedic traumatologists. A survey was created and distributed via REDCap to orthopedic traumatologists at 60 U.S. trauma centers. Out of 183 distributed surveys, 130 surgeons completed the survey (71%). The survey focused on the importance of nutrition and practice patterns in orthopedic trauma. Seventy-five percent of surgeons thought that nutritional status was "very important" to the final outcome of patients with orthopedic trauma injuries, 24% responded "somewhat important" and 1% responded "not important." Furthermore, 88% perform nutritional assessments; most surgeons (77%) utilize nutritional laboratory markers, with the most common markers being albumin, pre-albumin, transferrin and CRP. Additionally, 42% think trending the laboratory markers is important, and 50% are not sure if nutrition markers should be tested at multiple time points. Despite 75% of surgeons believing that nutrition is very important, only 8% discuss it with patients routinely. When asked what is more important for outcomes, nutrition or Vitamin D, almost three times as many surgeons thought nutrition was more important (29% vs 11%, respectively). While orthopedic traumatologists believe nutrition is an important determinant of patient outcomes, this study shows a clear lack of consensus and variability in practice regarding nutrition among surgeons. Orthopedic trauma surgeons need specific guidelines on how to assess and treat malnutrition in trauma patients.

Predictors of Episode-of-Care Costs for Ankle Fractures

Ankle fractures are one of the most resource-consuming traumatic orthopedic injuries. Few studies have successfully evaluated the episode-of-care costs (EOCC) of common traumatic orthopedic injuries. The objective of this study was to determine the EOCC associated with the surgical management of ankle fractures. A retrospective cohort study of 105 consecutive patients who underwent open reduction internal fixation of an isolated ankle fracture at a Canadian Level-1 trauma center was conducted. Episode-of-care costs were generated using an activity-based costing framework. The median global episode-of-care cost for ankle fracture surgeries performed at the studied institution was $3,487 CAD [IQR 880] ($2,685 USD [IQR 616]). Patients aged 60 to 90 years had a significantly higher median EOCC than younger patients (p = .01). Supination-adduction injuries had a significantly higher median EOCC than other injury patterns (p = .01). The median EOCC for patients who underwent surgery within 10 days of their injury ($3,347 CAD [582], $2,577 USD [448]) was significantly lower than the cost for patients who had their surgery delayed 10 days or more after the injury ($3,634 CAD [776], $2,798 USD [598]) (p = .03). Patient sex, anesthesia type, ASA score and surgeon's fellowship training did not affect the EOCC. This study provides valuable data on predictors of EOCC in the surgical management of ankle fractures. Delaying simple ankle fracture cases due to operating time constraints can increase the total cost and burden of these fractures on the healthcare system. In addition, this study provides a framework for future episode-of-care cost analysis studies in orthopedic surgery.

A standardised method for improving patient education material readability for orthopaedic trauma patients.

While the National Institutes of Health and American Medical Association recommend patient education materials (PEMs) should be written at the sixth-grade reading level or below, many patient education materials related to traumatic orthopaedic injuries do not meet these recommendations. The purpose of this study is to create a standardised method for enhancing the readability of trauma-related orthopaedic PEMs by reducing the use of≥three syllable words and reducing the use of sentences >15 words in length. We hypothesise that applying this standardized method will significantly improve the objective readability of orthopaedic trauma PEMs. A patient education website was queried for PEMs relevant to traumatic orthopaedic injuries. Orthopaedic trauma PEMs included (N=40) were unique, written in a prose format, and <3500 words. PEM statistics, including scores for seven independent readability formulae, were determined for each PEM before and after applying this standard method. All PEMs had significantly different readability scores when comparing original and edited PEMs (p<0.01). The mean Flesch Kincaid Grade Level of the original PEMs (10.0±1.0) was significantly higher than that of edited PEMs (5.8±1.1) (p<0.01). None of the original PEMs met recommendations of a sixth-grade reading level compared with 31 (77.5%) of edited PEMs. This standard method that reduces the use of≥three syllable words and <15 word sentences has been shown to significantly reduce the reading-grade level of PEMs for traumatic orthopaedic injuries. Improving the readability of PEMs may lead to enhanced health literacy and improved health outcomes.

Potential Factors Influencing Complete Functional Recovery in Traumatized Unowned Cats with Orthopedic Lesions-A Cohort Study.

The management of unowned cats is an emerging problem, with public institutions and citizens' concerns regarding their care and arrangement. Little is known regarding the outcome of traumatic orthopedic injuries in these patients. Indeed, complete functional recovery (CFR) should be the goal of treatment for return to their original location or adoption. The aim was to identify clinical factors influencing CFR in traumatized unowned cats with orthopedic lesions. This category of cats referred by the veterinary public service over three years was enrolled. Various clinical variables were retrospectively collected from the medical records and evaluated by nominal logistic analysis. Forty-eight unowned cats were enrolled, with a median estimated age of 24 (1-180) months and a body weight of 3 (0.7-5) kg. Thirty-four (71%) patients reached CFR. Estimated age, body weight, time from trauma to therapeutic intervention, spine involvement, presence of comorbidities, hospitalization time, and the radiographic score results were significantly associated with CFR. A longer time to therapeutic intervention seemed to be associated with a better outcome. Probably, cats severely traumatized did not live long enough to be evaluated and treated. Lighter cats experienced more severe consequences following blunt trauma. Younger and lighter cats bore a higher risk of panleukopenia-related death.

A qualitative longitudinal study of traumatic orthopaedic injury survivors’ experiences with pain and the long-term recovery trajectory

ObjectivesTo explore trauma patients’ experiences of the long-term recovery pathway during 18 months following hospital discharge.DesignLongitudinal qualitative study.Setting and participantsThirteen trauma patients with injuries associated with pain that had been...

Socioeconomic status is associated with greater hazard of post-discharge mortality than race, gender, and ballistic injury mechanism in a young, healthy, orthopedic trauma population

ObjectivesTo explore the utility of legacy demographic factors and ballistic injury mechanism relative to popular markers of socioeconomic status as prognostic indicators of 10-year mortality following hospital discharge in a young, healthy patient population with isolated orthopedic trauma injuries. MethodsA retrospective cohort study was performed to evaluate patients treated at an urban Level I trauma center from January 1, 2003, through December 31, 2016. Current Procedure Terminology (CPT) codes were used to identify upper and lower extremity fracture patients undergoing operative fixation. Exclusion criteria were selected to yield a patient population of isolated extremity trauma in young, otherwise healthy individuals between the ages of 18 and 65 years. Variables collected included injury mechanism, age, race, gender, behavior risk factors, Area Deprivation Index (ADI), and insurance status. The primary outcome was post-discharge mortality, occurring at any point during the study period. ResultsWe identified 2539 patients with operatively treated isolated extremity fractures. The lowest two quartiles of socioeconomic status (SES) were associated with higher hazard of mortality than the highest SES quartile in multivariable analysis (Quartile 3 HR: 2.2, 95% CI: 1.2–4.1, p = 0.01; Quartile 4 HR: 2.2, 95% CI: 1.1–4.3, p = 0.02). Not having private insurance was associated with higher mortality hazard in multivariable analysis (HR 2.0, 95% CI: 1.3–3.2, p = 0.002). The presence of any behavioral risk factor was associated with higher mortality hazard in univariable analysis (HR: 1.8, p < 0.05), but this difference did not reach statistical significance in multivariable analysis (HR: 1.4, 95%: 0.8–2.3, p = 0.20). Injury mechanism (ballistic versus blunt), gender, and race were not associated with increased hazard of mortality (p > 0.20). ConclusionLow SES is associated with a greater hazard of long-term mortality than ballistic injury mechanism, race, gender, and medically diagnosable behavioral risk factors in a young, healthy orthopedic trauma population with isolated extremity injury.

Can a Fully Electronic Patient Record-Based Virtual Fracture Clinic Increase Compliance With British Orthopaedic Association Guidelines for the Assessment of Acute Orthopaedic Trauma Patients?

Introduction There is clear guidance for the follow-up of acute orthopaedic trauma patients within 72 hours of presentation as per British Orthopaedic Association (BOA) guidelines. The virtual fracture clinic (VFC) model has been adopted nationwide to increase compliance with these guidelines. Traditionally our VFC was paper-based, but recently it has been made completely electronic with the introduction of Hive which is a comprehensive electronic patient record (EPR). The aim of this audit was to assess the effectiveness of the Hive VFC and to see the impact it has on improving the patient experience. Methods Data was collected retrospectively by looking at referrals to the Hive VFC across a seven-month period from its date of introduction. No patients were excluded and data was collected for 2,158 patients. Patient demographics, referral details, and outcomes were recorded on a Microsoft Excel version 16.0 for Windows spreadsheet (Microsoft Corporation, Washington, United States). Data was analysed using Microsoft Excel. Results Data was collected for 2,158 patients between September 9, 2022, and March 31,2023, in the Hive VFC. The largest proportion of injuries was found in the foot and ankle region with 32% of referrals (n=688), followed by hand and wrist with 30% (n=651), upper limb with 28% (n=595), and lower limb with 7% (n=142). There was a 50.4% (n=125)increase in the number of patients seen in the VFC across the study period with 248 patients being seen in September 2022, increasing to 373 in March 2023. The number of patients with acute traumatic orthopaedic injuries that were assessed within 72 hours on average was 94.5% per month. There was an increase of 7.3% during the study period from September 2022 to March 2023, 89.9% to 96.5%, respectively. Conclusion We believe that Hive VFC is a clinically sound and effective way of assessing acute traumatic orthopaedic patients and increasing compliance with BOA and NICE guidelines. The number of patients needing acute orthopaedic assessment is rising steadily, and this should alert us to find more convenient, time and cost-saving methods of delivering safe and effective patient care.

1325 Impact of the VFC in Fracture Clinic Referral Times

Abstract Aim According to BOAST guidelines, patients should be seen in fracture clinic within 72 hours of presentation, following acute traumatic orthopaedic injury. Our audit aimed to assess the efficacy of a Virtual Fracture Clinic (VFC) in meeting the standard of care outlined by the guidelines. Method A retrospective review of notes was carried out for patients seen in fracture clinic on a random week before the VFC was introduced and a random week after VFC was introduced. Incomplete records and follow up referrals were excluded. Results A total of 51 new patients were seen on a random week in clinic prior to VFC introduction. The range of time before clinic review was 1 - 17 days, with a mean of 6 days. 83% of patients were seen later than 72 hours. After introduction of VFC, 44 patients were seen on a random week. Range was 1 - 11 days, with a mean 3.6 days. Only 5% were seen later than 72 hours. Conclusions Introduction of the VFC ensured BOAST guidelines for time to be seen in clinic were met for 95% of patients. Delays in seeing patients are generally cut to at least half. Suggestions for further improvement in time to be seen include increasing the capacity of virtual clinics and making a separate triage for trauma patients in A&amp;E.

Rate and factors associated with surgical site infection following aseptic revision fixation of orthopaedic trauma injuries

PurposeThe primary aim of this study was to define the rate of infection following revision of fixation for aseptic failure. The secondary aims were to identify factors associated with an infection following revision and patient morbidity following deep infection.MethodsA retrospective study was undertaken to identify patients who underwent aseptic revision surgery during a 3-year period (2017–2019). Regression analysis was used to identify independent factors associated with SSI.ResultsEighty-six patients were identified that met the inclusion criteria, with a mean age of 53 (range 14–95) years and 48 (55.8%) were female. There were 15 (17%) patients with an SSI post revision surgery (n = 15/86). Ten percent (n = 9) of all revisions acquired a ‘deep infection’, which carried a high morbidity with a total of 23 operations, including initial revision, being undertaken for these patients as salvage procedures and three progressed to an amputation. Alcohol excess (odds ratio (OR) 1.61, 95% CI 1.01–6.36, p = 0.046) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR 11.1, 95% CI 1.00–133.3, p = 0.050) were independently associated with an increased risk of SSI.ConclusionAseptic revision surgery had a high rate of SSI (17%) and deep infection (10%). All deep infections occurred in the lower limb with the majority of these seen in ankle fractures. Alcohol excess and COPD were independent risk factors associated with an SSI and patients with a history of these should be counselled accordingly.Level of EvidenceRetrospective Case Series, Level IV.

Defining Characteristics of Middle-Aged and Geriatric Orthopedic Trauma in New York City over a 7-Year Period

ObjectivesExamine the patterns and defining characteristics of middle-aged and geriatric patients who sustain orthopedic trauma in New York City. Study DesignRetrospective cohort study. Methods11,677 patients >55 years old treated for traumatic orthopedic injuries were grouped into cohorts based on their age group (cohorts of 55-64, 65-74, 75-84, 85-94, ≥95 years) and year of presentation (2014-2021). Each patient was reviewed for demographics/comorbidities, injury mechanism/type, mortality data. Comparative analyses were conducted. ResultsThe average age of our cohort was 74 years old. The majority of patients were female (69%) and sustained their injuries via a ground level fall. The most common injuries sustained by patients occurred at the upper extremity (40%), hip (26%), and lower extremity (25%) with 820 (7%) patients sustaining polytrauma. The incidence of hip fractures and pelvic injuries increased with older age. Older patients had a higher rate of mortality through 1-year in addition to a longer length of stay. In contrast, the incidence of injury to the upper and lower extremity decreased with older age. ConclusionsThe rate of mortality out through 1-year following orthopedic trauma increased as patients got older. Significantly more women experienced a traumatic injury during 2014-2021. As age increased, ground level falls were the most common mechanism of injury with injuries more likely to occur in the axial skeleton, notably the hip and pelvis. Younger patients experienced higher rates of upper and lower extremity trauma. Providers should keep these patterns in mind to optimize care for middle-aged and geriatric trauma patients.

Traumatic orthopaedic motor vehicle injuries: Are there age and sex differences in pedestrian and cyclist accidents in a major urban center?

IntroductionInjuries caused by road traffic have become the leading cause of death in people aged 5 to 29 years, with pedestrians and cyclists being disproportionately affected. Research has demonstrated age and sex differences in road accidents in European populations. The purpose of this study was to determine age and sex-specific differences in pedestrian and cyclist accidents involving passenger cars at a single Level 1 Trauma Center in a major US metropolitan area. MethodsWe performed a retrospective chart review of 1,845 patients that presented to a single level 1 trauma center from January 1, 2016 - October 1st, 2021, and were involved in a motor vehicle vs. pedestrian or motor vehicle vs. cyclist accidents. Demographics, injury pattern, abbreviated injury scores (AIS), and hospital stay were analyzed, and the data was stratified by pedestrian vs. cyclist, biological sex, and race. Chi square analysis, t tests, and binomial logistic regression was used to examine sex and age-based differences. ResultsPedestrian vs. motor vehicle collisions (N = 1359, 74%) occurred more frequently than cyclists (N = 475, 26%) with an overall mortality rate of 6%. The mean age of pedestrians and cyclists was 39 and 42 years of age, respectively. Overall, more female than male patients had hand (mean=0.05 vs. 0.02) (p = 0.03) and pelvis fractures (mean 0.28 vs. 0.19) (p = 0.007). Females had a 1.2 times higher likelihood of getting a pelvis fracture than males (95% CI, 1.06 to 1.43). Linear regression analysis found a statistically significant relationship between older age and increased AIS severity (p < .001). Half of our sample consisted of Black patients (49.6% Black vs. 42.1% white). ConclusionFemale pedestrians and cyclists are at increased risk of obtaining pelvis fractures when in a traumatic road accident than males, regardless of age stratification, and age is a predictor of injury severity. Our study also found that race-based differences exist, with Black patients being injured more frequently. Further research is needed to better understand demographics at risk for traumatic road accidents, as well as evaluation of city infrastructure for biking and walking.

Scaling Surgical Resources: A Capacity Analysis of C-arm Machines in Haiti Following the 2021 Earthquake

BackgroundIn 2021, a 7.2 magnitude earthquake struck Haiti resulting in a surge of orthopaedic trauma requiring immediate surgical treatment. Safe and efficient operative management of orthopaedic trauma injuries requires intraoperative fluoroscopy through C-arm machines. The Haitian Health Network (HHN) received a philanthropic donation of three C-arm machines and considered an analytical tool may guide efficacious placement of those machines. The study objective was to develop and apply a clinical needs and hospital readiness measuring tool relevant to C-arm machines, which may guide decision-makers, such as HHN, in response to an emergency situation with a surge in need for orthopaedic treatment.MethodsAn online survey to assess surgical volume and capacity was created and then completed by a senior surgeon or hospital administrator based at hospitals within the HHN. Multiple-choice and free-text answer data were collected and classified into five categories: staff, space, stuff, systems, and surgical capacity. Each hospital received a final score out of 100, calculated by equal weighting of each category.ResultsTen out of twelve hospitals completed the survey. The average weighted score for the staff category was 10.2 (SD 5.12), the space category was 13.1 (SD 4.09), the stuff category was 15.6 (SD 2.56), the systems category was 12.25 (SD 6.50), and the surgical capacity category was 9.5 (SD 6.47). The average final hospital scores ranged from 29.5 to 83.0.ConclusionThis analysis tool provided data as to the clinical demand and capabilities of hospitals within the HHN to receive a C-arm machine and reaffirmed the critical need for more C-arms in Haiti. This methodology may be utilised by other health systems to provide data to distribute orthopaedic trauma equipment, which would benefit communities during periods of surge capacity, such as natural disasters.

Orthopaedic trauma patient non-adherence to follow-up visits at a level 1 trauma center serving an urban and rural population.

To assess key demographic and psychosocial variables that may be associated with non-adherence to clinic visits following orthopaedic trauma injuries to patients in an urban and rural population. This retrospective review included all operative and non-operative patients presenting to a Level I academic trauma center serving an urban and rural population in the Midwest following an orthopaedic injury. The study tracked patient attendance to scheduled orthopaedic trauma follow-up clinic visits after a scheduled visit in the clinic following a trauma-related injury. Data were obtained for 5816 unique orthopaedic trauma patients who had 21,066 post-treatment follow-up visits scheduled. 1627 "no-show" appointments were recorded. Factors associated with no-shows included male sex, age between 26 and 35 years, self-reported race other than white, employment listed as disabled, household income below $25,000, education less than a high school level, uninsured, Medicaid insured, and relationship status reported as single. In the present study, key demographic and psychosocial factors were significantly associated with patient adherence to scheduled follow-up appointments after treatment for orthopaedic trauma. Identifying patients at higher risk for nonadherence will allow healthcare teams to educate patients, providers, and staff, link patients to resources to enhance adherence, and work with their institutions to develop and implement protocols for improving adherence to follow-up appointments.

Epidemiology of Orthopaedic Fractures and Other Traumatic Injuries among Patients Admitted in a Tertiary Care Hospital: An Observational Study

Background: Orthopaedic fractures and traumatic injuries are a growing concern for healthcare systems worldwide. Road Traffic Accidents (RTA) are among the top five causes of illness and mortality in South East Asian nations. Trauma caused by other factors, such as accidents at work or home, falls, and assaults, significantly contribute to overall mortality and morbidity. This study aims to investigate the occurrence of traumatic injuries with associated factors and find significant orthopaedic fracture patterns. Material &amp; Methods: This study was a retrospective observational study that was conducted on 208 patients who were admitted to the department of orthopaedics at Dhaka Medical College and Hospital during the study period between April 2004 and June 2007 those who fulfilled the selection criteria were enrolled in this study. All data were processed and analyzed with the help of SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) version 25. The data were expressed as frequency and percentage in tables and graphs. Results: During the study period total number of study patients were 208 where 131 (62.98%) patients were male, and 77(37.02%) were female. The majority, 53 (25.48%) of the patients, were aged between 31-40 years. RTAs were responsible for 92 cases (44.23%) of all traumatic orthopaedic injuries and followed by falls accounting for 42 patients (20.19%) of injuries. Majority 46(22.12%) of the patients had fractures in femur, second majority 38(18.27%) patients had fracture in tibia/fibula. The most common fracture site being the lower limbs (58 cases, 27.88 %). Conclusion: The study concluded that the incidence of traumatic orthopaedic injuries was higher in young male adults compared to all other study groups. The three most frequent causes of injuries were falls, RTAs, and assaults were the most prevalent form of injury. The most frequently damaged bones are the femur and tibia/fibula.

Increasing Quality and Frequency of Goals-of-Care Documentation in the Highest-Risk Surgical Candidates: One-Year Results of the Surgical Pause Program.

We prospectively analyzed a longitudinal cohort of adult patients treated for traumatic orthopaedic injuries that were neither life- nor limb-threatening between January 1, 2020, and July 1, 2021. A rapid multidisciplinary review termed a "surgical pause" (SP) was available to those who were ≥80 years old, were nonambulatory or had minimal ambulation at baseline, and/or resided in a skilled nursing facility, as well as upon clinician request. Metrics analyzed include the proportion and quality of goals-of-care documentation, rate of return to the hospital, complications, length of stay, and mortality. Statistical analysis utilized the Kruskal-Wallis rank and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests for continuous variables and the likelihood-ratio chi-square test for categorical variables. A total of 133 patients were either eligible for the SP or referred by a clinician. Compared with SP-eligible patients who did not undergo an SP, patients who underwent an SP more frequently had goals-of-care notes identified (92.4% versus 75.0%, p = 0.014) and recorded in the appropriate location (71.2% versus 27.5%, p < 0.001), and the notes were more often of high quality (77.3% versus 45.0%, p < 0.001). Mortality rates were nominally higher among SP patients, but these differences were not significant (10.6% versus 5.0%, 5.1% versus 0.0%, and 14.3% versus 7.9% for in-hospital, 30-day, and 90-day mortality, respectively; p > 0.08 for all). The pilot program indicated that an SP is a feasible and effective means of increasing the quality and frequency of goals-of-care documentation in high-risk operative candidates whose traumatic orthopaedic injuries are neither life- nor limb-threatening. This multidisciplinary program aims for goal-concordant treatment plans that minimize modifiable perioperative risks. Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Catastrophic Health Expenditure in Patients with Lower-Extremity Orthopaedic Trauma.

Health-care expenditures are a leading contributor to financial hardship in the United States. Traumatic orthopaedic injuries are unpredictable and result in substantial expense. Our objectives were to quantify the catastrophic health expenditure (CHE) risk of patients with orthopaedic trauma and to examine the impact of insurance status, socioeconomic status, sex, and race on CHE. We identified all isolated lower-extremity orthopaedic trauma cases at a safety-net, Level-1 trauma center from 2018 to 2020. We queried an institutional charge database to obtain total hospital charges, insurance status, and ZIP Code to determine out-of-pocket (OOP) expenditures. To evaluate financial hardship, we calculated the CHE risk as defined by the World Health Organization's threshold of OOP expenditures, ≥40% of estimated household post-subsistence income. In our cohort of 2,535 patients, 33% experienced a risk of CHE. A risk of CHE was experienced by 99% of patients who were uninsured, 35% of patients with private insurance, 2% of patients with Medicare, and 0% of patients with Medicaid. Multivariable regression modeling showed that patients who were uninsured were significantly more likely to experience a risk of CHE compared with patients with private insurance (odds ratio, 107.68 [95% confidence interval, 37.20 to 311.68]; p < 0.001). One-third of patients with lower-extremity orthopaedic trauma experience a risk of CHE, with patients who are uninsured facing a disproportionately higher risk of CHE compared with patients who are insured. Our results suggest that the expansion of public insurance options may provide substantial financial protection for those at the greatest risk for CHE. Prognostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.