Characterization of patient population receiving bioactive glass bone graft substitute as intraoperative treatment for orthopaedic trauma fractures

Abstract

BackgroundBioactive glass synthetic bone grafts are used to treat osseous defects in orthopaedic surgery. Characterization of the clinical scenarios associated with bioactive glass use in the context of orthopaedic trauma, are not well established. This study aims to characterize population demographics, operative variables, as well as postoperative variables, for patients who required bone grafting for treatment of traumatic orthopaedic injuries and received a bioactive glass bone substitute intraoperatively. MethodsThe electronic medical record at a large Level I trauma center was queried for fracture patients between January 1st, 2019, and April 30th, 2022. Our retrospective cohort included fracture patients who received Fibergraft Matrix or Fibergraft Putty intraoperatively, and their respective control groups. This study ascertained patient demographic variables, operative variables, and postoperative variables. Differences in categorical variables were tested with Fischer's Exact Tests, while differences in continuous variables were tested with ANOVA. Statistical significance was determined as P < 0.05. If the overall Group model was significant for a given variable, post-hoc Fischer's Exact or Tukey HSD tests were used to assess pairwise significance between individual Group pairs. ResultsA total of four categories across our analysis of demographic, operative, and postoperative variables displayed significant differences amongst subject Groups (P ≤ 0.03). Individual groups were compared such that significant differences between subject groups could be appreciated for a specific variable. FM subjects had greater length of surgery, billable costs, and vitamin D supplementation at the time of surgery compared to FM controls. Similarly, FP subjects had greater length of surgery, billable cost, and implants used intraoperatively compared to FP controls. ConclusionThis analysis revealed Fibergraft patients to have greater length of surgery and billable cost, with respect to their matched controls. These data suggest that Fibergraft patients had more severe orthopaedic fractures compared to matched controls.