Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Research Articles

Factors influencing the spread of local anesthetic during the transverse abdominal plane block (study on unfixed corpses)

Introduction. Despite the proven clinical effectiveness of the transverse abdominal plane block (TAP block), the factors affecting the distribution of local anesthetic in the fascial case have not been fully studied, and there are no clear recommendations regarding the choice of the volume of local anesthetic taking into account anthropometry.The objective was to identify anthropometric factors influencing the choice of an adequate volume of local anesthetic for performing a TAP block.Materials and methods. In the pathology department, 40 upper and 40 lateral TAP blocks were performed in 20 corpses using ultrasound navigation. On the right side, 20 ml (block group A) of diamond green dye solution was injected, on the left side - 30 ml (block group B). The dependence of the area of distribution of the dye solution on the volume of the body, weight and height of the corpse was investigated. The analysis of the effect of damage in the execution zone on the area of dye distribution was carried out.Results. In the group B, the dye in 100 % of cases (n=18) spread to the nerve passage areas Th6 – Th9 in the upper TAP block and Th9 – L1 in the lateral TAP block. In group A, in 38.8 % of cases (n=7), the dye did not spread to the Th8-Th9 nerve passage area with the upper TAP block, as well as to the Th10 and Th12–L1 passage areas with the lateral TAP block. An inverse correlation of the growth and the dye distribution area was revealed (p < 0.01). In all unfixed corpses whose height exceeded 179 cm, the dye could not compromise all the zones of passage of nerve structures. Tissue damage in the area of the block limited the spread of the dye.Conclusion. Adequate distribution of local anesthetic depends on the patient’s height. With the height of >179 cm, 20 ml may not be enough to perform a TAP block, and <177 cm – 30 ml may be excessive.

Comparative Study between Subcostal Transverses Abdominis Block and Erector Spinae Plane Block for Post-operative Opioid Sparing Analgesia in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Patient

Background and Aim: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is one of the most commonly performed minimally invasive intra abdominal surgeries to remove the diseased gallbladder. Though associated with complications like pneumoperitoneum. Major benefits include reduced postoperative pain and fewer wound related adverse effects. Growing need for opioid sparing analgesia has led to use of regional techniques for post-operative pain relief. Aim of this study is to compare quality and duration of post-operative analgesia between subcostal transverses abdominis block and erector spinae plane block. Methods: It is a prospective study, where 40 patients were randomly allocated into two groups of 20 each. All the patients received 40 ml of inj 0.25% bupivacaine + 10 mcg inj dexmedetomidine in total. Erector spinae plane (EPS) block was performed in one group of patients and other received sub costal transverses abdominis plane (SCTAP) block. Quality of post-operative analgesia is documented using visual analogue score (VAS) and duration being assessed by the need for rescue analgesia for the set duration of post-operative stay. Results: In the erector spinae plane block group the VAS is considerably lower compared to subcostal transverses abdominis block group. Need for rescue analgesia with NSAIDs was lower in erector spinae plane block group patients. No complications related to the block were documented in either group. Conclusion: In conclusion ultrasound guided bilateral erector spinae plane block provides analgesia superior to bilateral subcostal transverses abdominis plane block.

Comparison of the analgesic efficacy of two different fascial blocks in patients undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery: A randomized control trial.

Moderate-to-severe intensity pain is reported on the first day following lower abdominal surgery. No study has compared transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block with retrolaminar block (RLB) in laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery for postoperative pain relief. In this prospective, randomized trial, 42 male patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I and II, aged 18-65 years, and having a BMI <40 kg/m2 received TAP or RLB following laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery. A standard general anesthetic technique was performed. Patients were randomized into two groups: single-shot TAP block (group I) (n = 21) or the RLB (group II) (n = 21) with bilateral 20 ml of 0.375% ropivacaine. Postoperatively, IV paracetamol 1 g was administered as rescue analgesia. Postoperative cumulative Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score 24 hours after surgery was considered as the primary outcome. Postoperative cumulative VAS score at rest at 24 h, represented as mean ± S.D (95% CI), in the TAP block group was 3.54 ± 3.04 (2.16-4.93) and in the RLB group was 6.09 ± 4.83 (3.89-8.29). P value was 0.112 and VAS on movement was 7.95 ± 3.41 (6.39-9.50 [2.5-15.0]) in TAP block group, whereas P value was 0.110 and VAS on movement was 10.83 ± 5.51 (8.32-13.34) in the RLB group. Similar postoperative cumulative pain score on movement at 24 h was present in patients receiving TAP block or RLB. However, VAS score at rest and on movement was reduced in patients receiving TAP block at 18 and 24 h postoperatively.

Analgesic benefits of pre-operative versus postoperative transversus abdominis plane block for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a frequentist network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BackgroundTransversus abdominis plane (TAP) block has been utilized to alleviate pain following laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). However, the optimal timing of administration remains uncertain. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of pre-operative and postoperative TAP blocks as analgesic options after LC.MethodsA frequentist network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted. We systematically searched PubMed (via the National Library of Medicine), EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Web of Science up to March 2023. The study included RCTs that enrolled adult patients (≥ 18 years) who underwent LC and received either pre-operative or postoperative TAP blocks. The primary outcome assessed was 24-hour postoperative morphine consumption (mg). Additionally, pain rest scores within 3 hours, 12 hours, and 24 hours, as well as postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), were considered as pre-specified secondary outcomes.ResultsA total of 34 trials with 2317 patients were included in the analysis. Postoperative TAP block demonstrated superiority over the pre-operative TAP block in reducing opioid consumption (MD 2.02, 95% CI 0.87 to 3.18, I2 98.6%, p < 0.001). However, with regards to postoperative pain, neither pre-operative nor postoperative TAP blocks exhibited superiority over each other at any of the assessed time points. The postoperative TAP block consistently ranked as the best intervention using SUCRA analysis. Moreover, the postoperative TAP block led to the most significant reduction in PONV.ConclusionsThe findings suggest that the postoperative TAP block may be slightly more effective in reducing 24-hour postoperative opioid consumption and PONV when compared to the pre-operative TAP block.Trial registrationPROSPERO, CRD42023396880.

Ultrasound-guided medial branch of the superior laryngeal nerve block to reduce peri-operative opioids dosage and accelerate patient recovery.

To explore whether the medial branch block of superior laryngeal nerve can reduce the stress response of patients undergoing intubation and further reduce the dosage of opioids. 80 patients undergoing gynecological laparoscopic surgery were selected, and randomly divided into 4 groups. All patients in the experimental groups received bilateral internal branch of superior laryngeal nerve block and transversus abdominis plane block. But the dosage of sufentanil used for anesthesia induction in the group A, B, and C was 0.4, 0.2, and 0μg/kg, respectively. Group D do not underwent supralaryngeal nerve block and the dosage of sufentanil was 0.4μg/kg. The heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure(MAP) were recorded at the time of entering the operating room(T1), before intubation after induction(T2), immediately after intubation(T3), 5min after intubation(T4), before extubation(T5), immediately after extubation(T6), 5min after extubation(T7). We also recorded the stay time in the recovery room, the number of cases of postoperative sore throat, the number of cases of nausea and vomiting, the first intestinal exhaust time, the length of hospital stay after operation. The HR of group A, C and D at T3 was significantly higher than that at T2(P < 0.01), while the HR of group B had no significant change. The HR of group A, C and D at T4 was lower than that at T3(P < 0.01), while the HR of group B had no obvious change. The HR of group C and D at T3 was significantly higher than that at T1 (P < 0.01). The MAP of group A and D at T4 was significantly lower than that at T1 (P<0.001). The first postoperative intestinal exhaust time in group A, B and C was significantly shorter than that in group D. The length of hospital stay after operation in group B and C was shorter than that in group D. Ultrasound-guided superior laryngeal nerve block combined with 0.2μg/kg sufentanil can reduce the intubation reaction, have better hemodynamic stability, reduce the first postoperative intestinal exhaust time and postoperative hospital stay, thereby accelerating the postoperative recovery of patients.

Dexmedetomidine vs Dexamethasone as an Adjuvant to Levobupivacaine in Ultrasound-Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Total Abdominal Hysterectomies.

In the postoperative period, open total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) surgeries induce considerable pain. Multimodal strategies are being used to alleviate pain. This study aimed to examine the efficacy and safety of dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to levobupivacaine in ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks for postoperative pain in TAH patients. A total of 72 patients with ASA grade I and grade II were randomly and equally assigned to two groups. After the completion of surgery with a subarachnoid block (SAB), patients in group 1 received a mixture of 20 mL of 0.25% levobupivacaine and 4 mg of dexamethasone on each side of the TAP block. Patients in group 2 received a mixture of 20 mL of 0.25% levobupivacaine and dexmedetomidine, with a total dose of 1 µg/kg body weight evenly distributed bilaterally in the TAP block. Patients were evaluated for pain using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), total tramadol consumption as rescue analgesia, time to first rescue analgesia, any adverse effects, and patient satisfaction. When comparing VAS scores for pain assessment, we observed that the mean VAS score was initially comparable between the two groups for the first hour. However, at 6, 9, and 12 h, VAS scores were significantly lower in group 2. The mean total tramadol consumption was higher in group 1 than in group 2 (213.33 ± 44.08 vs 161.11 ± 37.93 mg, P-value 0.027). The time to the first rescue analgesia after the TAP block in the postoperative period was significantly longer in group 2 (47.5 ± 62.76 vs 77.22 ± 56.14 min, P-value 0.002). No significant side effects were noted, and a greater proportion of patients in group 2 expressed satisfaction with their overall pain treatment. The addition of dexmedetomidine to levobupivacaine is superior to the addition of dexamethasone, as it prolongs the duration of the block in the dexmedetomidine group. However, the use of dexamethasone as an adjuvant is a good alternative option, particularly due to its lower cost and reduced incidence of adverse effects such as postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Assessment of Continuous Epidural Analgesia Versus Continuous Surgical Transverse Abdominis Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Gynecological Surgeries.

Background Surgical transverse abdominis plane (TAP) block has been studied in various surgeries. However, its role particularly in the form of continuous infusion in comparison to epidural infusion in open gynecological surgeries remains unknown. Hence, this study was taken up. Methodology Sixty patients were assigned to either of the two groups: continuous epidural (Group E) or continuous infusion in the surgical TAP (Group S). The primary outcomes were visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores and rescue analgesic requirements. Postoperative complications such as nausea/vomiting, hypotension, and bradycardia were also assessed. Results Mean pain scores were significantly lesser in Group E. However, 80% (24) of Group E and 50% (15) of Group S did not requirerescue analgesia, which was not statistically significant. Adverse effects did not differ significantly between the two groups. Conclusions The efficacy of the continuous surgical TAP block is similar toa continuous epidural. Therefore, it can be considered in settings with limited resources and expertiseor in cases of contraindications for an epidural.

Effect of Pharmacoprophylaxis on Postoperative Outcomes in Adult Elective Colorectal Surgery: A Multi-Center Retrospective Cohort Study within an Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Framework.

The application of enhanced recovery after surgery principles decreases postoperative complications (POCs), length of stay (LOS), and readmissions. Pharmacoprophylaxis decreases morbidity, but the effect of specific regimens on clinical outcomes is unclear. Records of 476 randomly selected adult patients who underwent elective colorectal surgeries (ECRS) at 10 US hospitals were abstracted. Primary outcomes were surgical site infection (SSI), venous thromboembolism (VTE), postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), pain, and ileus rates. Secondary outcomes included LOS and 7- and 30-day readmission rates. POC rates were SSI (3.4%), VTE (1.5%), PONV (47.9%), pain (58.1%), and ileus (16.1%). Cefazolin 2 g/metronidazole 500 mg and ertapenem 1 g were associated with the shortest LOS; cefotetan 2 g and cefoxitin 2 g with the longest LOS. No SSI occurred with ertapenem and cefotetan. More Caucasians than Blacks received oral antibiotics before intravenous antibiotics without impact. Enoxaparin 40 mg subcutaneously daily was the most common inpatient and discharge VTE prophylaxis. All in-hospital VTEs occurred with unfractionated heparin. Most received rescue rather than around-the-clock antiemetics. Scopolamine patches, spinal opioids, and IV lidocaine continuous infusion were associated with lower PONV. Transversus abdominis plane block with long-acting local anesthetics, celecoxib, non-anesthetic ketamine bolus, ketorolac IV, lidocaine IV, and pregabalin were associated with lower in-hospital pain severity rates. Gabapentinoids and alvimopan were associated with lower ileus rates. Acetaminophen, alvimopan, famotidine, and lidocaine patches were associated with shorter LOS. Significant differences in pharmacotherapy regimens that may improve primary and secondary outcomes in ECRS were identified. In adult ECRS, cefotetan or ertapenem may be better regimens for preventing in-hospital SSI, while ertapenem or C/M may lead to shorter LOS. The value of OA to prevent SSI was not demonstrated. Inpatient enoxaparin, compared to UFH, may reduce VTE rates with a similar LOS. A minority of patients had a documented PONV risk assessment, and a majority used as-needed rather than around-the-clock strategies. Preoperative scopolamine patches continued postoperatively may lower PONV and PDNV severity and shorter LOS. Alvimopan may reduce ileus and shorten LOS. Anesthesia that includes TAP block, ketorolac IV, and pregabalin use may lead to reduced pain rates. Acetaminophen, alvimopan, famotidine, and lidocaine patches may shorten LOS. Given the challenges of pain management and the incidence of PONV/PDNV found in this study, additional studies should be conducted to determine optimal opioid-free anesthesia and the benefit of newer antiemetics on patient outcomes. Moreover, future research should identify latent pharmacotherapy variables that impact patient outcomes, correlate pertinent laboratory results, and examine the impact of order or care sets used for ECRS at study hospitals.

A randomised controlled trial to study the analgesic efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block for adult undergoing elective laparoscopic appendectomy

Background: Laparoscopic appendectomy has evolved over the years as a minimally invasive approach for appendicitis. Routinely opioids are used for pain control postoperatively, however, its widespread use has numerous side effects and delays postoperative recovery. More recent studies have shown that transversus abdominis plane block reduces postoperative pain and analgesic drug usage. This study aims to evaluate the impact of transversus abdominis plane block in managing postoperative pain following elective laparoscopic appendectomy. Methods: A prospective, randomized, double-blind trial was performed on patients undergoing elective laparoscopic appendectomy. Patients were randomized to receive a TAP block with 0.25% bupivacaine and a control group receiving a TAP block with normal saline infusion. Laparoscopic port sites were infiltrated with bupivacaine in the control group and normal saline in the TAP block intervention group before starting the surgery. Postoperative pain scores were recorded using the visual analog scale scores at dedicated time points. Results: A total of 20 patients were included in the control group and 19 in the TAP block group. Visual analog scale scores were significantly reduced in the TAP block group at 6 hours, 12 hours, and 18 hours (p&lt;0.001 in each). However, there was no significant reduction in the visual analog scale score at 24 hours (p=0.015). There was no significant difference between postoperative nausea (p=0.18), and length of postoperative hospital stay (p=0.93) between the two groups. Consumption of rescue analgesics and antiemetics in the first 24 hours postoperatively between both groups was statistically significant (p=0.005). Conclusions: Bilateral TAP block is safe and effective in reducing the need for analgesics and antiemetics in patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy in the postoperative period. In addition, there is a significant improvement in visual analog scale scores in patients after TAP block.

Laparoscopic versus Ultrasound-Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia Management after Radical Prostatectomy: Results from a Single Center Study.

(1) Background: Regional anesthesia, achieved through nerve blocks, has gained widespread acceptance as an effective pain management approach. This research aimed to evaluate the efficacy of laparoscopic (LAP) transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. (2) Methods: From January 2023 to July 2023, 60 consecutive patients undergoing minimally invasive radical prostatectomy were selected. Patients were split into two groups receiving ultrasound-guided (US) or laparoscopic-guided TAP block. The primary outcome was a pain score expressed by a 0-10 visual analog scale (VAS) during the first 72 h after surgery. (3) Results: Both LAP-TAP and US-TAP block groups were associated with lower pain scores postoperatively. No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in surgery time, blood loss, time to ambulation, length of stay, and pain after surgery (all p > 0.2). In the LAP-TAP block group, the overall operating room time was significantly shorter than in the US-TAP block group (140 vs. 152 min, p = 0.04). (4) Conclusions: The laparoscopic approach, compared to the US-TAP block, was equally safe and not inferior in reducing analgesic drug use postoperatively. Moreover, the intraoperative LAP-TAP block seems to be a time-sparing procedure that could be recommended when patient-controlled analgesia cannot be delivered.

Ultrasound‐guided modified subcostal transversus abdominis plane block in a foal undergoing omphalectomy

SummaryA 7‐day‐old, 60 kg, Purebred Spanish Horse filly was referred with the mare to Complutense University of Madrid, Veterinary teaching hospital for elective omphalectomy. Upon admission, clinical examination was unremarkable except for a thickening of the umbilical area. Haematology and biochemistry values were within the normal range. On abdominal ultrasound (US) examination, a well‐defined, rounded (24 mm of diameter) area that contained heterogeneous material with numerous hyperechoic foci with acoustic shadowing was seen within the inner portion of the umbilical pedicle, between both umbilical arteries. Surgical correction with omphalectomy was scheduled. To provide perioperative analgesia, the transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block was considered. Under general anaesthesia, TAP block was performed in both left and right hemi‐abdominal walls with a modified subcostal approach with two‐site injections. A spinal needle was inserted under US guidance. During surgery, end‐tidal concentration of isoflurane was maintained at 0.7%–0.9%. Surgery was completed uneventfully and no signs of nociceptive input were observed, suggesting an adequate level of analgesia. Therefore, this TAP block technique may be considered to provide analgesia for surgical procedures involving the abdominal wall in foals.

The Bilateral Tap-Block Ultrasound-Guided in Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgery: Evaluation of a Curare-Free Anaesthetic Protocol

Introduction: The transverse abdominal plane block or TAP block consists of injecting a local anaesthetic between the internal oblique and transverse muscles. Its contribution to muscle relaxation during laparoscopic surgery has been little studied. Material and Method: We carried out a 2-years prospective, descriptive and analytical randomised study blinded to the surgeon conducted in the operating theatre of the Saint Louis Regional Hospital Centre. Patients were randomised into two groups: those who received vecuronium after rapid sequence induction (group V) and those who received bilateral TAP block without curares (group T). Anamnestic, clinical, anaesthetic, surgical and evolutionary aspects were collected and analysed. The main evaluation criteria were: pneumoperitoneum pressure, exhaled CO2, respiratory motor pressure and surgeon satisfaction scale. Results: We collected 61 patients admitted for laparoscopic abdominal surgery. The mean age was 32.9 years with a standard deviation of 14.5. Appendicitis was the indication in 55% of cases. The Propofol-celocurine-TAP-block anaesthetic protocol was used in 25 patients, i.e. in 41% of cases, and 59% of patients had undergone a conventional induction using vecuronium. The mean pressure of the pneumoperitoneum was 11.3 mmHg for the conventional induction group and 12.6 mmHg for the TAP-block group. The mean respiratory motor pressures were 12 cmH2O for the conventional induction group and 13.7 cmH2O for the TAP-block group. The mean value of exhaled CO2 was 37.5 mmHg. Fentanyl reinjections were more frequent in the conventional induction group in 55.6% of cases. The mean VAS at 6 hours post-op was 4.5 for the conventional induction group and 3 for the TAP-block group. Discussion/Conclusion: The ultrasound-guided trans-abdominal-pelvic block remains an effective, durable and reproducible technique. Its advantages in terms of postoperative analgesia are well known. In addition, its selective effects on muscle ......

A O02 How effective is the right subcostal laparoscopically-guided transversus abdominis plane block on pain control after laparoscopic cholecystectomy? A randomised controlled trial

Abstract Background The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is effective on pain relief after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). The procedure can be done under laparoscopic or ultrasound guidance and is often performed by injecting multiple abdominal areas. Data on the efficacy of the loco-regional block performed in the right subcostal region only are scanty. This study compared the effect of the right subcostal TAP block under laparoscopic guidance to the infiltration of local anesthetic to the port sites only (ILA) on pain relief, after elective LC. Methods A sample of 60 participants, 30 per arm, was estimated (two-sided a = 0.05%, power = 80%). Subjects having day-case (DC) LC were randomized into TAP block and ILA. Participants received Bupivacaine 0.5% 30 ml: TAP block – 20 ml in TAP block + 10 ml into the midline ports; ILA – 20 ml into the midline ports + 10 ml into the right-sided ones. Pain scores at rest at 1-hour post-surgery and at discharge, were evaluated with the Visual Analogue Scale score system. DC rate, Quality of Recovery-15 questionnaires, oral intake of opioids at day 3 and 7, were assessed too. Results Subjects in the ILA group were all women (p=0.0007) and younger (43.8 vs 37.7 years, p=0.023) than the TAP block. The median postoperative pain scores were 0 vs 1 at 1 hour (95% CI -1.99 to 1, p=0.60), 0 vs 1.5 at discharge (95% CI -2 to 0.99, p=0.55). The DC rate was 93.1% vs 93.5% (p=0.39). Six (10%) patients remained in hospital after surgery (postoperative pain [3], nausea [1], challenging surgical procedure [1], late theatre schedule [1]). Questionnaire scores and oral opioids intake did not differ between groups, on postoperative day 3 and 7. Conclusions The laparoscopically-guided right subcostal TAP block did not provide additional benefit to ILA on pain control, after LC.

The Efficacy of the Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Abdominoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is a regional abdominal anaesthetic technique frequently used within non-cosmetic abdominal surgery. Its use in cosmetic abdominoplasty procedures is less frequently documented. The literature is devoid of a meta-analysis to quantitatively amalgamate the results of individual reports analysing the efficacy of TAP block compared to alternative analgesic methods in abdominoplasty surgery. The authors aimed to conduct the first meta-analysis within the literature to evaluate this technique's effectiveness in abdominoplasties. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were referred to conduct this systematic review and meta-analysis. All observational and randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the postoperative outcomes of patients who underwent abdominoplasties with TAP blocks versus no TAP blocks were included in this study. The time taken to first analgesia and the amount of analgesia used were the primary outcome measures. The secondary outcome measures include severity of pain, time to mobilisation, and length of stay. Random effect modelling was used for the analysis. The time taken to the first analgesic was significantly lower in the TAP cohort (p <0.05). In addition, there was a lower incidence of postoperative nausea/vomiting(OR 0.18, 95%CI 0.04 - 0.90, p=0.04). Mean total opioid use and operative time were comparable between the TAP and no TAP groups. A qualitative review of the visual analogue scale for pain amongst the included studies showed that it was lower in the TAP group. The authors report the first meta-analysis within the literature showing the efficacy of the TAP block in abdominoplasties. Further high-quality trials are recommended to further the current evidence base.

A randomized comparative study of transversus abdominis plane block (tap) with 0.25% bupivacaine and 0.375% ropivacaine in the duration of post-operative analgesia in upper abdominal laparoscopic surgeries

Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is a successful postoperative analgesia technique in laparoscopic surgeries. This study compared the analgesic efficacy of 0.25% bupivacaine and 0.375% Ropivacaine in TAP block as post-operative analgesia for upper abdomen laparoscopic surgeries.: This randomized, double-blinded comparative study was conducted at the Dr Jeyasekharan Medical Trust and Nursing Home for 18 months. Seventy-one consenting adult patients undergoing upper abdominal laparoscopic surgeries qualifying the inclusion criteria to undergo Bilateral Subcostal TAP Block were included. The patient was labelled group A or B according to a computer-generated randomization list. TAP block was administered using 30 ml (15 ml on each side) of 0.25% bupivacaine (A) or 0.375% ropivacaine (B). Similar premedication and induction were given to all patients. : Among 71 patients in group A, males were 5 (14.7%), and females were 29 (85.3%). In group B, males were 7 (18.9%), and female was 30 (81.1%). There is no significant difference in gender, age, and BMI between groups. The mean duration of analgesia with 0.375% ropivacaine (10.21±3.36 hrs.) was significantly higher than 0.25% bupivacaine (6.38±2.03 hrs.). In the first 24 hours postoperatively, the mean total tramadol consumption was 147.06±11.94 mg in group A and 117.57±31.11 mg in group B, which is statistically significant.: This study concludes that 0.375% 30ml ropivacaine given as a TAP block under ultrasound guidance significantly prolonged the post-operative analgesia duration compared to 0.25% 30ml bupivacaine.

Intraoperative and Postoperative Effects of Dexmedetomidine and Tramadol Added as an Adjuvant to Bupivacaine in Transversus Abdominis Plane Block.

Background: We aimed to evaluate the intraoperative hemodynamics, opioid consumption, muscle relaxant use, postoperative analgesic effects, and possible adverse effects (such as nausea and vomiting) of dexmedetomidine and tramadol added as adjuvants to bupivacaine in the transversus abdominis plane block (TAP block) to provide postoperative analgesia. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective, randomized, controlled trial on patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. After obtaining ethical approval at the Van Yuzuncu Yil University and written informed consent, this investigation was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05905757). The study was conducted with 67 patients with ASA I-II physical status, aged 20-60 years, of either sex who were scheduled for an elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia. Exclusion criteria were the patient's refusal, ASA III and above, a history of allergy to the study drugs, patients with severe systemic diseases, pregnancy, psychiatric illness, seizure disorder, and those who had taken any form of analgesics in the last 24 h. The patients were equally randomized into one of two groups: Group T (TAP Block group) and Group D (Dexmedetomidin group). Standard general anesthesia was administered. After intubation, Group T (Bupivacaine + adjuvant tramadol) = solutions containing 0.250% bupivacaine 15 mL + adjuvant 1.5 mg/kg (100 mg maximum) tramadol 25 mL and Group D (Bupivacaine + adjuvant dexmedetomidine) = solutions containing 0.250% bupivacaine 15 mL + 0.5 mcg/kg and (50 mcg maximum) dexmedetomidine 25 mL; in total, 40 mL and 20 mL was applied to groups T and D, respectively. A bilateral subcostal TAP block was performed by the same anesthesiologist. Intraoperative vital signs, an additional dose of opioid and muscle relaxant requirements, complications, postoperative side effects (nausea, vomiting), postoperative analgesic requirement, mobilization times, and the zero-hour mark (patients with modified Aldrete scores of 9 and above were recorded as 0 h), the third-hour, and sixth-hour visual analog scale (VAS) scores were recorded. The main outcome measurements were the effect on pain scores and analgesic consumption within the first 6 h postoperatively, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and time to ambulation. The secondary aim was to evaluate intraoperative effects (on hemodynamics and opioid and muscle relaxant consumption). Results: It was observed that dexmedetomidine and tramadol did not have superiority over each other in terms of postoperative analgesia time, analgesic consumption, side effect profile, and mobilization times (p > 0.05). However, more stable hemodynamics were observed with dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant. Conclusions: We think that the use of adjuvant dexmedetomidine in the preoperative TAP block procedure will provide more stable intraoperative hemodynamic results compared with the use of tramadol. We believe that our study will be a guide for new studies conducted with different doses and larger numbers of participants.

The Impact of Missing Postoperative Longitudinal Pain Data on Study Results Investigating Analgesia from Transversus Abdominis Plane Block on Postoperative Day One Following Abdominal Surgery: A Single-Center Retrospective Chart Review.

The aims of this study are to analyze the association between the number of recorded pain scores and baseline pain following surgery, analgesia technique, and patient demographics, as well as the substitution of missing data with the results from mean substitution, last observation carried forward, regression imputation, multiple imputation, and mixed models. This retrospective chart review was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB). The following data were collected: patient demographics (age, gender, body mass index (BMI), race, and ethnicity); surgery type and date; analgesia with or without transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block; as well as the time, date, and value for all postoperative pain scores on the first postoperative day (POD). The following null hypotheses were tested: (1) the number of pain recordings will be independent of TAP block analgesia, baseline pain on POD 1, and patient demographics; and (2) there will be no significant differences in pain scores with and without TAP block analgesia following complete case analysis, mean substitution, last observation carried forward, regression imputation, multiple imputation, and mixed models. This study analyzed 486 patients including 2562 recorded pain scores. An increase in age by one year is, on average, associated with a 0.04 (95% confidence interval (CI) -0.060 to -0.025) decrease in the number of pain scores recorded (p < 0.001). Black race is associated with 0.763 less pain scores, on average (95% CI -1.49 to -0.039) and this value is statistically significant (p = 0.039). All datasets with substituted values for missing data yield lower pain scores for patients who did not receive TAP block. Significant differences in recorded pain scores are only noted for scores recorded between 0400 and 0759 and 1600-1959 in mixed models. Discrepancies in pain score recordings among patients are associated with age and black race. When these discrepancies are addressed with statistical methods, clinically significant differences are appreciated.

Transversus abdominis plane block provides analgesia in cats post-ovariohysterectomy

Transversus abdominis plane block provides analgesia in cats post-ovariohysterectomy

Ultrasound-Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Versus Intraperitoneal Instillation of Bupivacaine after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy – A Randomized Control Trial

Background: Postoperative pain prolongs hospital stay after laparoscopic cholecystectomy and remains a major challenge during the postoperative period. Effective pain control encourages early ambulation, which significantly reduces postoperative complications. In recent years, multimodal analgesia has been recommended with fewer adverse effects and more effective analgesia. The primary objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of analgesia between Transversus Abdominis Plane Block (TAP) Block and intraperitoneal instillation of bupivacaine by comparing the meantime of the first dose of rescue analgesia in either group and the total supplementary analgesia required. Methods: This retrospective observational study was conducted on 150 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy Group 1 comprised of patients who had received Intraperitoneal Bupivacaine for analgesia and Group 2 received TAP Block for pain relief. Results: Time of the first dose of analgesia after surgery was observed earlier in Group 1 as compared to Group 2 (Time – hours: 9.2 ± 2 vs. 12.3 ± 1.6; p = 0.0001. The Total dose of analgesic was higher in the Intra Peritoneal Bupivacaine Group as compared to the TAP group. Conclusion: AP block provided for a better quality of analgesia as assessed by the reduced requirement of intravenous supplementary analgesia which was less in patients who were given TAP Block as compared to local instillation of Bupivacaine. Keywords: Cholecystectomy, Bupivacaine, Transversus abdominis plane block

Pre-peritoneal Plus Portal Infiltration Versus Bilateral Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Laparoscopic Hernia Repair.

Background and objective The role of the pre-peritoneal infiltration of local anesthetic (PILA) in laparoscopic hernia repair has been equivocal. Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block has been extensively studied. However, studies comparing these two methods are very scarce. Hence, this study was undertaken to compare the efficacy of pre-peritoneal plus portal infiltration with TAP block in this population. Materials and methods This double-blinded randomized comparative study was conducted on a total of 32 patients by allotting 16 patients in each group. Group A patients were given pre-peritoneal plus portal infiltration of 15 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine for each technique by the operating surgeon, while Group B patients were administered bilateral TAP block with 0.5% ropivacaine, 15 mL on each side under ultrasound guidance by the anesthesiologist. Results The demographic variables and duration of surgery were comparable between the two groups. Also, the postoperative requirement of fentanyl between the two groups was insignificant. However, the duration of anesthesia was significantly longer in Group B attributing to the extra time taken for the administration of the TAP blocks. Conclusion Both ultrasound-guided TAP block and the PILA plus portal infiltration are effective techniques for pain relief after laparoscopic hernia repair. Either of these two techniques can be chosen depending on the availability of resources, expertise, etc.