You have accessJournal of UrologyProstate Cancer: Localized VII1 Apr 20101759 TRANSVERSE VERSUS VERTICAL CAMERA PORT INCISION IN ROBOTIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: IMPACT ON INCISIONAL HERNIAS AND COSMETICS Shawn Beck, Douglas Skarecky, Reina Juarez, and Thomas Ahlering Shawn BeckShawn Beck More articles by this author , Douglas SkareckyDouglas Skarecky More articles by this author , Reina JuarezReina Juarez More articles by this author , and Thomas AhleringThomas Ahlering More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2010.02.1608AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Robot-assisted or laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP/LRP) has historically used a vertical incision for the camera port above or below the navel. The camera incision is also the port used to extract the prostate. The incidence of incisional hernias (IH) has not been specifically addressed. We examine our incidence of IH and propose a simple modification to reduce IHs and improve cosmesis. Additionally, we propose that the width of scar between vertical and transverse incisions should act as a visual indicator of internal forces of the fascial closure. METHODS Of 900 RARPs, 735 had a vertical and 165 have had transverse incisions. As a referral center, we don't have definitive long term follow up on all patients. We emailed 443 men of which 83 bounced. Of the successful 360 emails, 192 (53%) replied: 18 reported having an IH. We also identified 18 separate IH men followed at our institution in our electronic data base. These 36 incisional hernias occurred in patients with vertical incisions. We compared baseline factors in the IH group to the entire cohort (n=735) and the 192 email respondents without IH (n=84). In the secondary analysis our nurse (RJ) measured the maximum width of the camera port in all men presenting to our clinic for follow up. TRANSVERSE, n= 31 and VERTICAL n=82. Statistical analysis was performed using t-test. RESULTS The rate of IH could be as low as 4.9% (36/735) or as high as 9.4% (18/192). To date there has been just 1 incisional hernia in the transverse group 0.6% (1/165) although the average follow up is much shorter in this group (2.8 yrs vs 0.8 yrs). There was no difference in baseline factors between the vertical and transverse incision groups. However, baseline factors between the IH group and controls were as follows. Age 63.3 yrs vs 61.1 yrs p=.06, IIEF-5 17.1 vs 19.6 p=.06, BMI 27.2 vs 26.2 p=.11 and prostate wt. 62.2gms vs 51.1 gms p=0.01. In the analysis of vertical vs transverse incisions the average maximum scar width was 5.5 mm vs 2.1 mm (p<.0001, 95%CI, Upper limit=4.6, Lower=2.6). CONCLUSIONS In this study we attempted to specifically address our incisional hernia rate which we have estimated the risk to be potentially as low as 4.9% and as high as 9.4%. Baseline factors that appear to influence the development of incisional hernias at the camera port include direction (transverse vs vertical), prostate weight, older age, IIEF-5 and BMI. Additionally, transverse closures had much smaller scar width which we feel reflects less tension on the skin and hence the fascial closure which reasonably should result in fewer incisional hernias. Orange, CA© 2010 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 183Issue 4SApril 2010Page: e680 Peer Review Report Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2010 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Shawn Beck More articles by this author Douglas Skarecky More articles by this author Reina Juarez More articles by this author Thomas Ahlering More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Read full abstract