Transverse Incision Group Research Articles

Comparison of Longitudinal and Transverse Transperitoneal Incisions in Abdominal Aortic Surgery: A Retrospective Analysis

Abstract Objective: Patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) may be treated with endovascular intervention or open surgical repair. Despite the possibility of a retroperitoneal approach for open surgery, many surgeons prefer a transperitoneal approach. Transperitoneal aortic exposure may be done by longitudinal or transverse incisions. Transverse incisions are thought to be less painful and have less perioperative complications as compared to longitudinal midline incisions, but the reports to this effect are not conclusive. To address the lack of data comparing perioperative outcomes in aortic surgery incisions, our center conducted a retrospective study. Our aim was to generate concrete evidence regarding the choice of incision and its impact on surgical outcomes, filling a crucial gap in existing knowledge. Materials and Methods: Fifty-two consecutive cases were selected from our institute’s database who underwent elective open AAA repair, with 26 cases each in longitudinal and transverse incision group. Data were analyzed to compare the effects of type of incision for abdominal aortic surgery on the duration of ventilatory requirements and intensive care unit (ICU) stay, postoperative ileus, perioperative analgesia requirement, and the duration of hospital stay in these patient groups. Results: Baseline characteristics and comorbidities of the study population were comparable. Postoperative hospital stays were notably shorter for patients with transverse incisions than those with longitudinal incisions. The transverse incision group also exhibited a statistically significant reduction in postoperative ileus development. However, no significant differences were observed between the two study groups in terms of ventilatory requirements, postoperative analgesia needs, and ICU stays. Conclusion: The ongoing discourse in the literature surrounding the incision choices find support in our study, indicative of advantages of transverse incisions that include lower postoperative ileus and shorter hospital stays. However, no clear benefits were observed regarding postoperative ventilation and analgesic requirements. Study limitations underscore the necessity for future prospective research with larger samples and longer follow-ups, yet the findings suggest that transverse incisions may offer improved perioperative outcomes, potentially easing financial strains on patients and health-care systems through reduced hospitalization durations.

Which incision is better for Lewis to Brown Norway rat liver transplantation, transverse or midline?

Orthotopic rat liver transplantation (OLT) is a complex microsurgical procedure extensively applied to basic science, myriad complications can occur, but incision-related self-biting has not been reported after OLT. For the project of tolerance induction through stem cells, we performed OLT from Lewis to Brown Norway (BN) rats as an acute rejection model and divided the study into the transverse incision group (n = 15) and midline incision group (n = 22), while cyclosporine A was subcutaneously injected for 10-day immunosuppression use, lidocaine cream was used for pain-relieving. The recipient survival and wound status were the primary endpoint of this study. For the transverse incision group, 30-day survival rate was 40% (6/15), self-biting occurred in 13 cases in 7–39 days, the degree 1 of biting occurred in 1 cases, the degree 2 in 2 cases. The degree 3 in 10 cases, which caused death or euthanasia, the self-biting rate was 86.7% (13/15), For the midline incision group, 30-day survival rate was 100% (22/22), the degree 1 of self-biting occurred in 3 cases, no severe self-biting occurred. There were significant differences for survival (p = 0.0003) and for self-biting rate (p < 0.01) between two groups. In conclusion, incision-related self-biting behavior occurs due to incisional injury, the transverse incision is severely pain-causing; the midline one is effective to avert occurrences.

Transverse Incision for Pancreatoduodenectomy Reduces Wound Complications: A Single-Center Analysis of 399 Patients.

Even if the minimally invasive approach is advancing in pancreatic surgery, the open approach is still the standard for a pancreatoduodenectomy. There are two types of incisions used: the midline incision (MI) and transverse incision (TI). The aim of this study was to compare these two incision types, especially regarding wound complications. A retrospective review of 399 patients who underwent a pancreatoduodenectomy at the University Hospital Erlangen between 2012 and 2021 was performed. A total of 169 patients with MIs were compared with 230 patients with TIs, with a focus on postoperative fascial dehiscence, postoperative superficial surgical site infection (SSSI) and the occurrence of incisional hernias during follow-up. Postoperative fascial dehiscence, postoperative SSSI and incisional hernias occurred in 3%, 8% and 5% of patients, respectively. Postoperative SSSI and incisional hernias were significantly less frequent in the TI group (SSI: 5% vs. 12%, p = 0.024; incisional hernia: 2% vs. 8%, p = 0.041). A multivariate analysis confirmed the TI type as an independent protective factor for the occurrence of SSSI and incisional hernias (HR 0.45 (95% CI = 0.20-0.99), p = 0.046 and HR 0.18 (95% CI = 0.04-0.92), p = 0.039, respectively). Our data suggest that the transverse incision for pancreatoduodenectomy is associated with reduced wound complications. This finding should be confirmed by a randomized controlled trial.

Impact of non-muscle cutting periumbilical transverse incision on the risk of incisional hernia as compared to midline incision during laparoscopic colon cancer surgery: a study protocol for a multi-centre randomised controlled trial

BackgroundMinimally invasive surgery has become popular as a surgical approach for colorectal cancer because it has fewer complications related to the abdominal incision and perioperative complications. However, the incidence of incisional hernias in laparoscopic surgery has been reported to be similar to that in open surgery. We developed a new method, the non-muscle-cutting periumbilical transverse incision, for a small incision in laparoscopic colon cancer surgery. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the non-muscle-cutting periumbilical transverse incision in comparison with the midline incision in reducing the incidence of an incisional hernia in patients undergoing laparoscopic colon cancer surgery.MethodsThis is an open-label, multi-centre, parallel, superiority, and randomised trial. Altogether, 174 patients will be allocated in a 1:1 ratio to either the midline incision or the non-muscle-cutting periumbilical transverse incision group, after stratifying by the location of the tumour (right- or left-sided). The primary outcome of this study is the incidence of incisional hernias (both symptomatic and radiologic hernias) at 12 months after surgery. The secondary outcomes include operative outcomes, 30-day postoperative complications, pathological results, and patient-reported outcomes (short form-12 health survey questionnaire and body image questionnaire). Both primary (intention-to-treat) and secondary (as-treated principles) analyses will be performed for all outcomes. The statistical significance level was set at p < 0.05 (two-sided testing).DiscussionThis trial may show that the non-muscle-cutting periumbilical transverse incision will reduce the incidence of incisional hernias compared to the midline incision.Trial registrationClinical Research Information Service (CRiS) of Republic of Korea, KCT0006082. Registered on April 12, 2021.

Transverse incision versus longitudinal incision in the implantation of PICC-port: A before-after study.

The peripherally inserted central catheter-port (PICC-port) technique is an innovation of the standard arm-totally implantable vascular access device. The design of surgical skin incision may have an important impact on the postoperative life of patients, the cosmetic result is important for patient satisfaction as well. To compare two different incision methods in the implantation of PICC-port. A before-after study. A total of 62 adult patients with malignant tumor requiring chemotherapy in Shanghai General Hospital were selected by convenience sampling, 31 in each group. All participants agreed to install PICC-port with signature from 1 Jan to 30 April, 2022. 31 patients were given longitudinal incision, about 3 cm below the puncture point obliquely. Another 31 patients were given transverse incision, about 3 cm below the puncture point. T-test, chi-square test and rank sum test were used to compare the differences between the two groups in incision healing, scar score, and operation time. There was no statistically significant difference in incision healing between the two groups(p > 0.05). The scar scores of patients with transverse incision were higher than that of patients with longitudinal incision at 3 months (p < 0.05). And the operation time of longitudinal incision group was longer than that of transverse incision group(p < 0.05). Our study revealed that PICC-port implantation could be considered as safe as PICC insertion conducted by nurse. During our follow-up, all patients with PICC-port implantation had good wound healing, and there were no complications such as local infection happened. The transverse incision was more easier to be operated in bag making in PICC-port implantation.

Circumumbilical incision for neonatal abdominal surgery: additional skin incision when there is difficulty in manipulating the intestine.

This study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of circumumbilical incision (CUI) for neonates requiring intestinal anastomosis. Seventy neonates requiring intestinal anastomosis at our institution between 2003 and 2020 were included in this retrospective case-control study. Patients were classified into the CUI (25 patients: 36%) and transverse incision (TI) groups (45 patients: 64%). Postoperative complications and surgical outcomes were compared between the two groups. Intestinal perforation at the non-anastomotic site occurred significantly more often in the CUI group than in the TI group (3 patients: 12%, and 0 patients: 0%, respectively (p = 0.042)). There were no between-group differences regarding anastomotic leakages, anastomotic strictures, time to enteral feeding, operative time, and blood loss. Neonatal intestinal surgery employing CUI might be associated with increased intestinal perforation at the non-anastomotic site. Hesitating to enlarge the skin incision to maintain favorable cosmetic outcomes might cause severe injury to the delicate neonatal intestine during the surgical procedure owing to the restricted surgical field. When performing CUI, we suggest that the skin incision should be extended without hesitation whenever there is difficulty in manipulating the intestine.

Effect of Transverse Versus Longitudinal Incisions on Anterior Knee Pain After Tibial Nailing (TRAVEL): A Multicenter Randomized Trial with 1-Year Follow-up.

Anterior knee pain is common after tibial nailing, and its origin is poorly understood. Literature suggests it may be related to infrapatellar nerve injury. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of a transverse (potentially infrapatellar nerve-sparing) incision versus a longitudinal incision for the insertion of a tibial nail with respect to anterior knee pain. Patients with a tibial shaft fracture undergoing treatment with use of an intramedullary nail were randomized to a transverse incision (n = 68) or longitudinal incision (n = 68) in multiple centers. The primary outcome measure was kneeling pain based on a numeric rating scale (NRS). Secondary outcome measures included knee pain during daily activities, functional outcome (Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment and Lower Extremity Functional Scale), quality of life (EuroQol-5 Dimensions), activity resumption, complications, reoperations, and costs within 1 year after trauma. At 12 months, the estimated marginal mean for kneeling pain was 2.4 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6 to 3.2) in the transverse incision group and 3.7 (95% CI, 3.0 to 4.5) in the longitudinal incision group. Regression analysis showed no significant difference between the groups over time. Knee pain scores for daily activities, functional outcome scores, and quality of life were also comparable between the groups. Signs of infrapatellar nerve injury were found less often after a transverse incision (18% versus 54%; p < 0.001). The median total (direct and indirect) costs per patient were €10,468 in the transverse incision group and €11,066 in the longitudinal incision group. Loss of productivity accounted for 67% and 52% of the total costs in the 2 groups, respectively. A transverse incision reduces injury to the infrapatellar nerve, but anterior knee pain scores and function are comparable after use of a transverse or longitudinal incision for tibial nail insertion. Therapeutic Level I . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

TU2.4 Synthesis review with meta-analysis on risk of incisional hernia following transverse versus vertical midline incision for specimen extraction in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resections

Abstract Objective The objective of this article is to explore the risk of incisional hernia (IH) occurrence at the site of specimen extraction following laparoscopic colorectal resection (LCR), highlighting the comparison between transverse incision versus midline vertical abdominal incision. Method Analysis was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Systematic search of medical databases like MEBASE, MEDLINE and pubmed was performed to find all types of comparative studies reporting the incidence of IH at the specimen extraction site of transverse or vertical midline incision following LCR. The analysis of the pooled data was done using the RevMan statistical software. Result Twenty-five comparative studies (including 2 RCTs) on 10362 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. There were 4944 patIents in the transverse incision group and 5418 patients in the vertical midline incision group. In the random effects model analysis, the use of transverse incision for specimen extraction following LCR reduced the risk of IH development [odds ratio 0.30, 95% CI (0.19–0.49), z= 4.88, p=0.00001]. However, there was significant heterogeneity (Tau2 = 0.97; Chi2= 109.98, df = 24(p=0.00004; I2 = 78%) among included studies. Conclusion Transverse incision used for specimen extraction following LCR seems to reduce the risk of postoperative IH incidence compared to vertical midline abdominal incisions.

Mini-open transverse flexor crease incision versus limited longitudinal palmar incision carpal tunnel release: A short term outcome study

ObjectiveTo compare the outcome of carpal tunnel release using the limited longitudinal palmar incision technique and mini open transverse flexor crease incision technique. Materials and methodslBetween October 2017 and September 2019, we performed Carpal Tunnel release procedures on 122 consecutive patients with unilateral idiopathic CTS. Patients in Group A (64 patients) had a palmar mini open longitudinal incision at wrist. Patients in Group B (58 patients) had a small flexor crease transverse incision. In the non palmar transverse incision group, we used a blunt ended facelift scissors to cut the flexor retinaculum after placing a dural retractor between the retinaculum and median nerve. The preoperative and postoperative (2 weeks,6 weeks,3 months, 6 months and 1 year) patient statuses were evaluated with the Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire (BCTSQ) scores, VAS, grip strength and return to work days. ResultsThe BCTSQ symptom severity scale and functional status scale showed significant improvement following surgery in Group B compared to Group A at 2 weeks,6 weeks and 3 months (p < 0.05). At 6 months and 1 year follow up, both the symptom severity and functional status scale were comparable in both the groups. Grip strength, pillar pain and scar tenderness showed significant improvement in transverse flexor incision group compared to longitudinal palmar incision group at 6 weeks and 3 months and were comparable later on. ConclusionWe conclude that the mini open transverse flexor crease incision technique using the conventional instruments is simple, safe and cost-effective mode of treatment of idiopathic CTS when compared to the limited palmar incision technique. Though the long term outcomes are comparable in both groups, the flexor crease transverse incision group patients had better pain relief, better cosmesis and shorter recovery period than the palmar incision group

Mini-transverse incision using a novel bush-hook versus conventional open incision for treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: a prospective study

PurposeThis study aimed to investigate the outcomes of a mini-transverse incision with a bush-hook versus a conventional open incision for carpal tunnel release (CTR).MethodsThis was a prospective study. The decision to receive either technique (mini-transverse incision with a bush-hook or conventional open incision) was primarily based on patients’ choice. Patients’ symptom severity, functional status, and symptomatic pain were measured at pre-operation, 1 month, and 3 and 6 months postoperatively, and any relevant complications were recorded. Kelly’s scale was used to evaluate the overall clinical efficacy.ResultsEighty-nine patients were included in the open CTR group and 85 patients in the mini-transverse incision group. The mini-transverse incision group had a significantly smaller incision (4.4±0.6 vs 44.8±3.7 mm), shorter surgical time (7.8±1.9 vs 21.2±3.4 min), and shorter hospital stay (3.7±1.6 vs 5.9±2.0 days) than did the open CTR group. Both groups showed significant improvements from baseline levels (all P<0.001). At postoperative 1 month and 3 months, the transverse incision group showed a significantly better VAS, SSS, and FSS (all P<0.05), but the difference was non-significant at 6 months except for FSS (P=0.022). Also, mini-transverse incision showed a significantly reduced time to return to work and activities, trend to a higher rate of excellence, and good and fewer complications than did the open CTR.ConclusionsThe mini-transverse incision exhibited better performance in surgery-related measures, symptomatic remission, functional recovery, and postoperative morbidity, thus could be considered a promising technique alternative.

Maternal and neonatal outcomes in transverse and vertical skin incision for placenta previa

BackgroundPlacenta previa, a serious obstetric issue, should be managed by experienced teams. The safe and appropriate mode of delivery for placenta previa is by cesarean delivery. However, no studies were found comparing either maternal or neonatal outcomes for different skin incision in women with placenta previa. The aim of this study was to compare maternal and neonatal outcomes by skin incision types (transverse compared with vertical) in a large cohort of women with placenta previa who were undergoing cesarean delivery.MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort study carried out between January 2014 and June 2019. All pregnant women with placenta previa had confirmed by ultrasonologist before delivery and obstetrician at delivery. The primary outcome was the estimated blood loss during the surgery and within the first 24 hours postoperatively. Mean (standard deviation), median (interquartile range) or frequency (percentage) was reported to variables. Appropriate parametric and nonparametric tests were used to analyses.ResultsThe study included 1098 complete records, 332 (30.24%) cases in the vertical skin incision group and 766 (69.76%) cases in the transverse skin incision group. Those with vertical incision showed a higher percentage of preterm delivery, anterior placenta, abnormally invasive placenta, and history of previous cesarean delivery, and a lower percentage of first pregnancy, in vitro fertilization, and emergency cesarean delivery. After controlling for confounding factors, higher incidence of post-partum hemorrhage (OR 5.47, 95% CI 3.84–7.79), maternal intensive care unit (OR 4.30, 95% CI 2.86–6.45), transfusion (OR 5.97, 95% CI 4.15–8.58), and 5-min APGAR< 7 (OR 9.03, 95% CI 1.83–44.49), a more estimated blood loss (β 601.85, 95%CI 458.78–744.91), and a longer length of hospital stay after delivery (β 0.54, 95%CI 0.23–0.86) were found in the vertical skin incision group.ConclusionsOur data demonstrated that transverse skin incision group showed the better perinatal outcomes in women with placenta previa. Future collaborative studies are needed to be done by centers for placenta previa to have a better understanding of the characteristics and the outcomes of the disease in the choosing skin incision.

Midline incision vs. transverse incision for specimen extraction is not a significant risk factor for developing incisional hernia after minimally invasive colorectal surgery: multivariable analysis of a large cohort from a single tertiary center in Korea.

Incisional hernia (IH) is a commonly encountered problem even in the era of minimally invasive surgery (MIS). Numerous studies on IH are available in English literature, but there are lack of data from the Eastern part of the world. This study aimed to evaluate the risk factors as well as incidence of IH by analyzing a large cohort collected from a single tertiary center in Korea. Among a total number of 4276 colorectal cancer patients who underwent a surgical resection from 2006 to 2019 in Korea University Anam Hospital, 2704 patients (2200 laparoscopic and 504 robotic) who met the inclusion criteria were analyzed. IH was confirmed by each patient's diagnosis code registered in the hospital databank based on physical examination and/or computed tomography findings. Clinical data including specimen extraction incision (transverse or vertical midline) were compared between IH group and no IH group. Risk factors of developing IH were assessed by utilizing univariable and multivariable analyses. During the median follow-up of 41months, 73 patients (2.7%) developed IH. Midline incision group (n = 1472) had a higher incidence of IH than that of transverse incision group (n = 1232) (3.5% vs. 1.7%, p = 0.003). The univariable analysis revealed that the risk factors of developing IH were old age, female gender, obesity, co-morbid cardiovascular disease, transverse incision for specimen extraction, and perioperative bleeding requiring transfusion. However, on multivariable analysis, specimen extraction site was not significant in developing IH and transfusion requirement was the strongest risk factor. IH development after MIS is uncommon in Korean patients. Multivariable analysis suggests that specimen extraction site can be flexibly chosen between midline and transverse incisions, with little concern about risk of developing IH. Careful efforts are required to minimize operative bleeding because blood transfusion is a strong risk factor for developing IH.

Can high transverse skin incision (Modified Maylard) be a new alternative in placenta accreta spectrum management with cesarean hysterectomy?

Background: Assess optimal surgical management of cases with placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorder. Methods: This was a retrospective study conducted between January 2012 and November 2020. Two alternative types of incision were performed in patients diagnosed with PAS. (1) A high transverse skin incision, 12–14 cm in length, was performed through the skin 5–8 cm above the pubic symphysis. (2) A vertical skin incision was made from the xiphoid process to the pubic symphysis, passing around the umbilicus. We compared intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of both types of incisions in patients undergoing caesarean hysterectomy. The aesthetic appearance of the scar was assessed using the scar cosmesis assessment and rating (SCAR) scale. Results: Forty-four placenta accreta spectrum patients were evaluated. No differences were observed between the skin incision groups regarding exploration and surgical manipulation. Lengths of hospitalization and operative times were less in patients undergoing high transverse skin incision compared to vertical incision (5.5 ± 1.1, 8.0 ± 1.1, p = 0.03; respectively). Wound site complications were lower in high transverse skin incision patients. Patients in the high transverse incision group had significantly better SCAR scores than patients in the vertical incision group (3.3 ± 0.9 vs 11.4 ± 1.8; p &lt; 0.001) and a significantly higher proportion in the high transverse incision group were very satisfied or satisfied with the cosmetic aspects of the scar (p = 0.001). Conclusion: The high transverse incision method in women with PAS is a better method of skin incision giving reduced operative and hospitalisation times and improved cosmetic outcomes.

Blood loss from transverse versus longitudinal uterine incision in abdominal myomectomy: a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundIt is unclear whether transverse uterine incision is non-inferior to longitudinal incision during myomectomy with regard to bleeding. Our aim was to compare between transverse and longitudinal uterine incisions in myomectomy.MethodsA parallel randomized controlled single-blinded study in a university affiliated hospital, in the period between January 2017 and April 2018, in which 52 women candidates for abdominal myomectomy were randomized into transverse uterine incision or longitudinal uterine incision groups (26 in each group). Intraoperative blood loss (estimated directly by blood volume in suction bottle and linen towels and indirectly by difference between preoperative and postoperative hematocrit), operative time and postoperative fever were analyzed.ResultsNo statistically significant difference was found between transverse and longitudinal incisions regarding intraoperative blood loss (389.7 ± 98.56 ml vs 485.04 ± 230.6 ml respectively, p value = 0.07), operative time (59.96 ± 16.78 min vs 66.58 ± 17.33 min respectively, p value = 0.18), and postoperative fever (4% vs 8.33%, p value = 0.6).ConclusionTransverse uterine incision does not cause more blood loss than longitudinal incision and is a reasonable option during abdominal myomectomy.Trial registration: NCT03009812 at clinicaltrials.gov, registered January 2017

A comparative study of carpal tunnel release through three kinds of small incision for the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome

Objective To compare the clinical efficacy and complications of small transverse and longitudinal incision of the wrist, and the small longitudinal incision of the palm in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Methods From June 2015 to June 2018, 150 patients with CTS were diagnosed and treated. There were 50 cases of wrist small transverse incision, 50 cases of wrist small longitudinal incision and 50 cases of longitudinal incision at the root of the palm for carpal tunnel release. The visual analogue scale (VAS), BCTQ score, Kelly's evaluation of clinical efficacy, postoperative complications, neuro-electrophysiological parameters, two-point discrimination and basic operation conditions were compared in three groups at 1, 3 and 6 months after operation. Results There was no significant difference in VAS, BCTQ score and Kelly's evaluation of clinical efficacy and excellent rate between the three groups (P>0.05); the incidence of postoperative scar pain and overall complications in the wrist longitudinal incision group was significantly higher than that in the wrist transverse incision group and the longitudinal incision at the root of the palm (P 0.05). Conclusion The results of three kinds of small incision carpal tunnel release surgery are similar in the treatment of CTS, but the complications of longitudinal incision at the root of the palm and wrist small transverse incision for carpal tunnel release surgery are less. Key words: Carpal tunnel syndrome; Treatment outcome; Small incision; Release

Factors affecting the effectiveness and safety of submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection for esophageal submucosal tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer.

Submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER) has been proved to be effective and safe for esophageal submucosal tumors (SMTs) originating from the muscularis propria (MP) layer. This study was aimed to further evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and influencing factors especially the types of mucosal incision of STER in a larger population. A total of 89 patients undergoing STER with esophageal SMTs were retrospectively enrolled in this study from May 2012 to November 2016. Clinicopathological, endoscopic, and adverse events (AEs) data were collected and analyzed. Different incision methods were compared to evaluate the optimum incision method. There were 27 females and 62 males with mean age of 46.5±10.3years. The medium size of the tumors was 16.0mm (ranging 10.0-60.0mm). Inverted T incisions were made in 29 (32.6%) patients, transverse incisions in 12 (13.5%) while longitudinal incisions in 48 (53.9%). En bloc resection was achieved in 70 (78.7%) patients. The residual rate was 1.1% (1/89), and no recurrence was noted even after piecemeal resection. The rate of AEs was 21.3% (19/89), and all of the AEs were cured without intervention or treated conservatively without the need for surgery. The en bloc resection rate was comparable among the three incision groups (P=0.868); however, the incidence of AEs in the inverted T incision was lower than that in the longitudinal incision (P=0.003). Fewer clips were used in the inverted T incision group than in the transverse incision group (P=0.003). Although STER failed to achieve en bloc resection in 21.3% patients, it was still an effective therapy owing to low residual rate and no recurrence rate after piecemeal resection. STER was safe with no severe AEs; however, minor AEs were common. Inverted T incision seems to be the optimum entry point.

Low transverse incision for lateral neck dissection in patients with papillary thyroid cancer: improved cosmesis

BackgroundVarious incisions and approaches have been developed for lateral neck dissection. The purpose of this study was to compare the surgical and cosmetic outcomes of a single low transverse incision with the hockey stick incision for lateral neck dissection (LND) in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC).MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 97 patients with PTC who underwent therapeutic LND and total thyroidectomy by low transverse incision (62 patients) or hockey stick incision (35 patients). We compared the operative results, cosmetic outcomes, objective scar measurement, and sensory disturbance between the two groups.ResultsThe number of harvested and metastatic lymph nodes, Vancouver Scar Scale scores, and sensory change were not significantly different between the two groups. The mean number of harvested lymph nodes in level II was 9.82 vs. 9.63 (P = 0.885) (transverse incision vs. hockey stick incision, respectively) and in level V was 6.36 vs. 5.63 (P = 0.597). However, subjective satisfaction with the scar and neck contour was higher in the low transverse incision group compared with the hockey stick incision group. Scores for scar consciousness and sensory change were not significantly different between the two groups.ConclusionsA single low transverse incision may provide equivalent surgical outcomes and superior cosmetic outcomes compared with the hockey stick incision for LND in PTC.

Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes of Repeated Cesarean Delivery: A Comparison between Transverse and Vertical Skin Incision

Objective: To compare maternal and neonatal outcomes in women who had repeated cesarean section between transverse and vertical skin incision . Material and methods: This comparative study was conducted from April 2014 until July 2015 at Rajavithi Hospital. Patients were recruited from women who had planned and undergone repeated cesarean delivery both scheduled and in emergency conditions. Women who enrolled in this study were having single pregnancy, without classical cesarean section, previous intra-abdominal surgery from other indication, and HIV infection backgrounds. Subjects were divided into two groups, transverse and vertical skin incisions. Data was collected from antenatal care records, anesthetic notes, operative notes and the research record forms. Results: According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 500 subjects were selected. There were 286 and 214 subjects in the transverse and vertical skin incision groups, respectively. Incision-to-delivery interval in transverse was longer than in the vertical group by about 2 minutes (p < 0.001). The total operative time ± S.D. was 84.67±30.96 and 79.69±26.83 minutes in the transverse and vertical skin incision groups, respectively (p = 0.043). There was no statistical difference in internal organ injuries, estimated blood loss, post-operative outcomes, Apgar scores and fetal injuries. Conclusion: In repeated cesarean delivery, transverse skin incision illustrated more incision-to-delivery interval and total operative time than vertical skin incision, but no difference in adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Chest-wall contouring surgery in female-to-male transgender patients: A one-center retrospective analysis of applied surgical techniques and results.

Chest-wall contouring surgery is an important part of the gender reassignment process that contributes to strengthening the self-image and facilitating living in the new gender role. Here, we analyze the surgical techniques used in our clinic and report the results. Female-to-male transgender patients (n = 57) undergoing chest-wall contouring surgery at Tampere University Hospital between January 2003 and April 2015 were enrolled in the study. Breast appearance was evaluated and either a concentric circular approach or a transverse incision technique was used for mastectomy. Patient characteristics and data regarding the technique and postoperative results were collected and analyzed retrospectively. In addition to the transgender diagnosis, 40.4% of the patients had another psychiatric diagnosis. For mastectomy, a concentric circular approach was used in 50.9% and a transverse incision approach in 49.1% of the patients. In the transverse incision group, 21.4% of the patients underwent pedicled mammaplasty and 78.6% mastectomy with a free nipple-areola complex graft. Compared with the transverse incision group, breasts were smaller (p < 0.001) and body mass index value was lower in the concentric circular group (p = 0.001). One-third of the patients had complications (hematoma, infection, seroma, fistula, or partial necrosis of nipple-areola complex) and the reoperation rate was 8.8%. Hematoma was the most frequent reason for reoperation. Corrections were required for the scar in 14.0% of the patients, the contour in 28.0%, the areola in 15.8%, and the nipple in 5.3%. Secondary corrections were needed more often in the concentric circular (55.2%) than in the transverse incision group (25.0%; p = 0.031). The larger the breast, poorer the skin quality, and greater the amount of excess skin, the longer the required incision and resulting scar is for mastectomy of female-to-male patients. Hematoma is the most common reason for acute reoperation and secondary corrections are often needed.

Outcome of longitudinal versus transverse incision in de Quervain's disease and its implications in Indian population.

de Quervain's disease is an inadequacy into the first extensor compartment of wrist between the osteofibrous tunnel and the tendons. This mechanical conflict generates a tenosynovitis of the extensor pollicis brevis and the abductor pollicis longus tendons in first dorsal extensor compartment of the wrist. (1) To compare the clinical results obtained by longitudinal and transverse incisions and (2) the implication of clinical results in Indian population. This study was conducted at Kalpana Chawla Government Medical College, Karnal, Haryana. The inclusion criteria were positive Finkelstein's test and no response to non-surgical treatment for 6 weeks. Forty-eight patients with de Quervain's disease who did not respond to conservative treatment were operated with two different incisions. The patients were followed at 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months to compare the surgical outcomes. During a three-month follow-up, a significant difference was shown between the two methods (p = 0.0001). Results of surgical treatment with longitudinal incision were better (only one hypertrophic scar), but there were 12 postoperative complications with transverse incision. Visual analog scale (VAS) was used to evaluate the hypertrophic scar. In transverse incision group, out of five patients, four patients who developed hypertrophic scar have poor score according to VAS. Overall, longitudinal incision should be used for surgical treatment for de Quervain's disease due to lower risk of complications.